Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2018 Nov 5;19(11):3469. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113469

Uridine Diphosphate-Dependent Glycosyltransferases from Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 Catalyze the 15-O-Glycosylation of Ganoderic Acid A

Te-Sheng Chang 1,†, Jiumn-Yih Wu 2,†, Tzi-Yuan Wang 3, Kun-Yuan Wu 1, Chien-Min Chiang 4,*
PMCID: PMC6275011  PMID: 30400606

Abstract

Bacillus subtilis ATCC (American type culture collection) 6633 was found to biotransform ganoderic acid A (GAA), which is a major lanostane triterpenoid from the medicinal fungus Ganoderma lucidum. Five glycosyltransferase family 1 (GT1) genes of this bacterium, including two uridine diphosphate-dependent glycosyltransferase (UGT) genes, BsUGT398 and BsUGT489, were cloned and overexpressed in Escherichia coli. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography confirmed the two purified UGT proteins biotransform ganoderic acid A into a metabolite, while the other three purified GT1 proteins cannot biotransform GAA. The optimal enzyme activities of BsUGT398 and BsUGT489 were at pH 8.0 with 10 mM of magnesium or calcium ion. In addition, no candidates showed biotransformation activity toward antcin K, which is a major ergostane triterpenoid from the fruiting bodies of Antrodia cinnamomea. One biotransformed metabolite from each BsUGT enzyme was then isolated with preparative high-performance liquid chromatography. The isolated metabolite from each BsUGT was identified as ganoderic acid A-15-O-β-glucoside by mass and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The two BsUGTs in the present study are the first identified enzymes that catalyze the 15-O-glycosylation of triterpenoids.

Keywords: ganoderic acid, Bacillus subtilis, biotransformation, UDP-glycosyltransferase

1. Introduction

The fundamental step in developing new drugs is finding new compounds. In addition to synthetic and natural sources, biotransformation is an alternative route for obtaining new compounds. Xenobiotics can be biotransformed into new compounds via microorganisms or enzymes. Based on the numerous bioactivities of triterpenoids, several scientists have focused on studying triterpenoid biotransformations to find new bioactive triterpenoids [1,2,3,4].

Ganoderma lucidum (the Chinese name for which is “Lingzhi”) has numerous bioactive constituents, such as polysaccharides and triterpenoids [5]; more than 300 different triterpenoids have been identified from Ganoderma spp. [6]. Ganoderic acid A (GAA) is a typical Ganoderma triterpenoid [7] which has been validated with many bioactivities [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Although hundreds of bioactive triterpenoids have been isolated from G. lucidum, few studies have focused on the biotransformation of Ganoderma triterpenoids. On the other hand, our previous study showed that Bacillus subtilis ATCC (American type culture collection) 6633 biotransforms antcin K, a major ergostane triterpenoid from the fruiting bodies of Antrodia cinnamomea, to its glycoside derivatives [14]. In the present study, the B. subtilis strain was confirmed to biotransform the most abundant Ganoderma triterpenoid GAA as well. Therefore, we were interested in examining the key enzymes of B. subtilis ATCC 6633 in the biotransformation of GAA and antcin K triterpenoids.

In nature, glycosylation is catalyzed by glycosyltransferases (GTs, EC 2.4.x.y), which transfer sugar moieties from the activated donor molecules to specific acceptor molecules [15,16,17]. According to the Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes (CAZy) database, GTs are now classified into 105 families [18]. Among them, some glycosyltransferases family 1 (GT1) proteins were found to use small molecules, such as flavonoids or terpenes, as sugar acceptors [15,16,17]. Furthermore, uridine diphosphate (UDP)-dependent glycosyltransferases (UGTs), which belong to the GT1 gene family, can use UDP-glucose as the sugar donor [15,18]. Thus, five GT1 genes, including two UGT genes, were cloned from the B. subtilis ATCC 6633 strain and overexpressed in Escherichia coli. The biotransformation activities of the expressed enzymes were confirmed and optimized in this study. The metabolite biotransformed by the functional enzymes was then isolated and identified.

2. Results

2.1. Confirming Biotransformation of GAA by Bacillus Subtilis ATCC 6633

To confirm whether B. subtilis ATCC 6633 could biotransform GAA, the bacterium was cultivated in broth with GAA, and the fermentation broth was analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC).

Figure 1 shows the UPLC of the initial (dashed line) and 24 h (solid line) fermentation broths of the strain B. subtilis ATCC 6633 with GAA. The precursor GAA appeared at a retention time (RT) of 8.6 min. After 24 h fermentation, the peak of the precursor decreased, while two new peaks—a major peak, compound (1), with a RT of 7.0 min and a minor peak, compound (2) with a RT of 6.3 min—appeared. Moreover, the two new peaks did not appear at 24 h of the fermentation broths of the strain in the absence of GAA (Figure S1). The results confirmed that GAA was biotransformed by the strain B. subtilis ATCC 6633.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Biotransformation of ganoderic acid A (GAA) by B. subtilis ATCC (American type culture collection) 6633. The strain was cultivated in modified glucose-nutrient (MGN) media containing 0.02 mg/mL of ganoderic acid A (GAA). The initial cultivation (dashed line) and the 72 h cultivation (solid line) of the fermentation broth were analyzed with ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). The UPLC operation conditions are described in the Materials and Methods section.

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of GTs from B. subtilis ATCC 6633

Previous studies showed three microbial UGTs were validated with triterpenoid glycosylation activity, including BsYjiC (GenBank Protein Accession No. NP_389104) from B. subtilis 168 [19,20], UGT109A1 (GenBank Protein Accession No. ASY97769) from B. subtilis CTCG 63501 [21], and BsGT1 (GenBank Protein Accession No. ANP92054) from B. subtilis KCTC 1022 [22]. To classify which GT genes of B. subtilis ATCC 6633 are responsible for the biotransformation of GAA, a phylogenetic analysis of 30 annotated GTs from the B. subtilis ATCC 6633 genome (GenBank BioProject Accession No. PRJNA43011) was compared with the three validated microbial UGTs (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Molecular phylogenetic analysis of BsGT candidates inferred with the maximum likelihood (ML) method. The best-fit ML model selection is mtREV24 [23]. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−6498.11) is shown. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying the neighbor-join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using a JTT model and then selecting the topology with the superior log likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with the branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 10 amino acid sequences. All positions with less than 95% site coverage were eliminated. That is, fewer than 5% alignment gaps, missing data, and ambiguous bases were allowed at any position. There were a total of 372 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X [24].

Among the 30 GTs, nine GT1 family genes (star in Figure 2), including two UGTs (BsUGT398 and BsUGT489), were identified as putative gene candidates. The results revealed BsUGT489 (GenBank Protein Accession No. WP_003220489) of B. subtilis ATCC 6633 was clustered with three validated UGTs (gray background in Figure 2). BsUGT398 (GenBank Protein Accession No. WP_003225398), BsGT110 (GenBank Protein Accession No. WP_003220110), BsGT292 (GenBank Protein Accession No. WP_032727292), and BsGT296 (GenBank Protein Accession No. WP_003219296) were closely related to the UGT cluster. Thus, the five candidates (bold text in Figure 2) were selected for further functional assay.

2.3. Cloning and Overexpression of GT1 from B. subtilis ATCC 6633 in E. coli

Among the five GT1 genes of B. subtilis ATCC 6633, three GT1 genes (BsGT110, BsGT292, BsGT296) had been previously subcloned into the pETDuet-1™ expression vector, overexpressed in E. coli BL-21 (DE3), and the produced GT1 proteins were purified with Ni2+ chelate affinity chromatography [25]. Thus, the three purified GT1 enzymes were ready for use in this study. The other two GT1 genes (BsUGT398, and BsUGT489) were newly amplified from B. subtilis ATCC 6633 genomic DNA with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with specific primer sets (Table S1) and subcloned into the pETDuet-1 expression vector to form pETDuet-BsUGT (Figure S2a). The recombinant BsUGT was overexpressed in E. coli. The produced protein was purified and analyzed with sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (Figure S2b). Thus, the five purified GT1 proteins were used for another biotransformation assay.

2.4. Activity Assays of GT1 from B. subtilis ATCC 6633 Toward GAA

The five purified GT1 proteins were incubated with UDP-glucose and the precursor GAA. After a 30 min reaction, the reaction mixtures were analyzed with UPLC. Only BsUGT398 and BsUGT489 had biotransformation activity toward GAA, while the other three GT1 proteins of B. subtilis ATCC 6633 did not have this activity. Because our previous study showed that BsGT110 exhibited glycosylation activity toward 8-hydroxydaidzein [25], the reason for the lack of activity of the GT1 toward GAA is the substrate specificity. However, neither BsGT292 nor BsGT296 were active toward GAA and 8-hydroxydaidzein. The substrates of the two BsGTs are not known yet. The UPLC results further revealed the biotransformed metabolite in either the BsUGT398 (Figure 3a) or BsUGT489 (Figure 3b) reaction had an identical RT of 7.0 min, which was the same as the RT of compound (1) in the GAA biotransformation by the strain B. subtilis ATCC 6633 (Figure 1). Thus, this result implied that the BsUGT enzymes and the strain B. subtilis ATCC 6633 might have the same or similar biotransformation activity toward GAA.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Biotransformation of GAA by purified BsUGT398 (a) or BsUGT489 (b). Two micrograms of purified BsUGT398 or BsUGT489 were incubated with 0.4 mM uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose and 0.02 mg/mL of GAA in the presence of 50 mM Tris pH 8.0 and 10 mM of MgCl2. After 30 min incubation, the mixtures were analyzed with UPLC. The UPLC conditions are described in Materials and Methods.

In a previous study, we showed that B. subtilis ATCC 6633 could glycosylate antcin K, a major ergostane triterpenoid from the fruiting bodies of Antrodia cinnamomea [14]. Thus, we speculated that the five GT1 enzymes might have the ability to biotransform antcin K. The purified GT1 proteins were also incubated with UDP-glucose and the precursor antcin K. After a 30 min reaction, the reaction mixtures were analyzed with UPLC. Unfortunately, the results showed that no metabolite was biotransformed by the five GT1 proteins.

2.5. Optimal Catalyzing Conditions for BsUGT398 and BsUGT489

The activities of purified BsUGT398 and BsUGT489 were determined at different pH values, temperatures, and metal ions. Many GTs utilize divalent metal ion cofactors, and Mg2+ was conjugated in the native crystals of some GTs [26]. In addition, Ca2+ and Mn2+ were also used in the crystal structure studies of GTs [27]. Therefore, we decided to use the three metal ions to optimize the activities of the two BsUGTs. On the other hand, to expand the testing range of the metal ions, a potentially inhibitory cation, Cd2+, was also used. The result is shown in Figure 4. The optimal catalyzing condition for each UGT protein is pH 8.0 with 10 mM of Mg2+ or Ca2+. The activity of the two UGTs decreased by about 70% in the absence of either the Mg2+ or Ca2+ metal ion and was completely inhibited in the presence of Cd2+. For temperature, BsUGT398 and BsUGT489 had optimal activity at 40 and 30 °C, respectively.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Effects of pH (a,b), temperature (c,d), and metal ion (e,f) on BsUGT398 (a,c,e) or BsUGT489 (b,d,f) activity. The standard condition was set as 2 µg of the purified enzyme, 1 mg/mL of GAA, 10 mM of MgCl2, and 10 mM of uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose in 50 mM of Tris at pH 8.0 and 40 °C. To determine the optimal reaction condition, the pH, temperature, or metal ion in the standard condition was replaced with the tested condition. Relative activity was obtained by dividing the area of the summation of the product peak of the reaction in the UPLC profile with that of the reaction at the standard condition. The mean (n = 3) is shown, and the standard deviations are represented by error bars.

2.6. Isolation and Identification of the Biotransformation Metabolite

To resolve the chemical structures of the metabolites, the biotransformation was scaled up by either BsUGT398 or BsUGT489, and the metabolite from each biotransformation was purified with preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). From a 40 mL reaction mixture containing 20 µg/mL of BsUGT, 1 mg/mL of GAA, 10 mM of UDP-glucose, 10 mM of MgCl2, and 50 mM of Tris pH 8.0, 15.1 mg and 37.4 mg of the metabolite, compound (1), were isolated from the biotransformation by BsUGT398 and BsUGT489, respectively. The metabolite from each biotransformation was elucidated with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra. They showed identical mass and 13C-NMR data. The mass data showed an [M − H]− ion peak at m/z: 677.67 in the ESI-MS spectrum, corresponding to C36H53O12 that indicated the glucosylation of GAA. The structure of the metabolites was further confirmed as GAA-15-O-β-glucoside using NMR data, by comparison with that in our previously reported study [28]. The NMR spectrum of the two metabolites from either BsUGT398 or BsUGT489 are shown in Figure S3-S16.The biotransformation process of GAA by either BsUGT398 or BsUGT489, where d-glucose was tentatively assumed, is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Biotransformation process of GAA by BsUGT398 or BsUGT489.

3. Discussion

Before the present study, three microbial UGTs—BsYjiC [19,20], UGT109A1 [21], and BsGT1 [22]—had been demonstrated to possess triterpenoid glycosylation activity. These UGTs catalyze the C-3, C-6, C-12, or C-20 carbon positions with a hydroxyl group for glycosylation of triterpenoids. Accordingly, BsUGT398 and BsUGT489 from B. subtilis ATCC 6633 that catalyzes the C-15 glycosylation of GAA are unique, and the glycosylation site on the triterpenoids is also new. Only one metabolite, glycosylation on the C-15 hydroxyl group, was biotransformed by the two BsUGTs, in spite of the other C-7 hydroxyl or C-26 carboxyl groups of GAA available for glycosylation (Figure 5). Moreover, neither of the two BsUGTs catalyzed the glycosylation of antcin K, which contains C-3, C-4, and C-7 hydroxyl and C-26 carboxyl groups but lacks the C-15 hydroxyl group available for glycosylation in the structure. The results imply that the two BsUGTs have regio- and substrate selection of glycosylation of triterpenoids.

B. subtilis ATCC 6633 has been reported to possess glycosylation activity toward the pentacyclic triterpenoids oleanolic acid, echinocystic acid, or betulinic acid [29] or the C-26 carboxyl group of tetracyclic ergostane triterpenoid, antcin K [14]. Moreover, all the glycosylation activity by the strain were at carboxyl groups of the triterpenoid precursors. However, five GT1 enzymes of B. subtilis ATCC 6633 lacked biotransformation activity toward antcin K. Therefore, other enzymes must be responsible for catalyzing glycosylation on the carboxyl groups of the triterpenoids in the B. subtilis ATCC 6633. Nevertheless, previously identified triterpenoid-glycosylation UGT enzymes, including BsYjiC [19,20], UGT109A1 [21], BsGT1 [22], BsUGT398, and BsUGT489 (the present study), have been proven to catalyze the glycosylation of triterpenoids only on the hydroxyl groups of triterpenoids. Thus, the other GT family enzymes responsible for glycosylation on the carboxyl groups of triterpenoids remain unknown and should be investigated from the B. subtilis ATCC 6633 strain in the future. In addition to the GT families, some glycoside hydrolase (GH) families, such as the GH13 and GH70 families, have been reported to possess glycosyltransferase activity and accept small molecules, such as flavonoids, as sugar acceptors [17,30]. Thus, these GH enzymes of B. subtilis ATCC 6633 might also catalyze glycosylation on the carboxyl group of triterpenoids. Further studies to elucidate such catalytic enzymes will be undertaken in our laboratory.

Glycosylation is a common modification reaction in the biosynthesis of natural compounds. GT1 proteins are powerful enzymes in the glycosylation of natural compounds for in vivo or in vitro use. Glycosylation enhances the lipophilicity and water solubility of natural compounds. The development of a new biotransformation system of triterpenoid glycosylation would expand the search for new triterpenoids and the applications of the newly produced triterpenoids in medicine, cosmetics, and pharmacology use in the future.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Microorganism and Chemicals

B. subtilis ATCC 6633 (BCRC 10447) was purchased from BCRC (Food Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan). Antcin K was obtained by the procedure in our previous study [14]. GAA was bought from Baoji Herbest Bio-Tech (Xi-An, Shaanxi, China). UDP-glucose was purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The other chemicals, materials needed for PCR, restriction enzymes, reagents and solvents used were of high quality, and were purchased from commercially available sources.

4.2. Identification of Bacteria B. subtilis ATCC 6633 with Biotransformation Activity

B. subtilis ATCC 6633 was cultivated in 20 mL of a modified glucose-nutrient (MGN) medium which contained 5 g/L of peptone, yeast extract, K2HPO4, and NaCl; 20 g/L of glucose [14] and 20 mg/L of GAA. The cultivation was carried out at 180 rpm and 28 °C for 24 h. After cultivation, 1 mL of the culture was then mixed with an equal volume of methanol and analyzed with UPLC.

4.3. UPLC

The UPLC system (Acquity UPLC H-Class, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was equipped with an analytic C18 reversed-phase column (Kinetex® C18, 1.7 µm, 2.1 i.d. × 100 mm, Phenomenex Inc., Torrance, CA, USA). The operation conditions for UPLC of GAA and antcin K were from our previous study [14].

4.4. Expression and Purification of GT1 of B. subtilis ATCC 6633

The genomic DNA of B. subtilis ATCC 6633 was isolated using the commercial kit Geno PlusTM (Viogene, Taipei, Taiwan). BsUGT398 and BsUGT489 of B. subtilis ATCC 6633 were amplified from the genomic DNA with PCR with specific primer sets (Table S1). The amplified GT1 genes were subcloned into the pETDuet-1™ vector through suitable restriction enzyme sites (Table S1) to obtain the expression vector pETDuet-UGT (Figure S2a). The expression vectors were transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) via electroporation to obtain recombinant E. coli.

Recombinant BsUGT398 and BsUGT489 were produced and purified from the recombinant E. coli. The experimental procedure was the same as our previous study [25].

4.5. In Vitro Biotransformation Assay

In vitro biotransformation was performed by purified GT1 protein. In 1 mL reaction mixture, 2 µg of purified GT1 protein, 0.02 mg/mL of GAA or antcin K, 0.4 mM of UDP-glucose, 10 mM of MgCl2, and 50 mM of Tris pH 8.0 were added. The reaction was carried out at 40 °C for 30 min. After the reaction, the mixture was stopped by adding an equal volume of methanol and analyzed with UPLC. For the optimal experiments, 2 µg of the purified BsUGT398 or BsUGT489, 1 mg/mL of GAA, and 10 mM of UDP-glucose were used. The pH, temperature, or metal ion described above was replaced by the tested condition. For pH testing, phosphate buffer at pH 6.0 and 7.0) and Tris buffer at pH 8.0 and 9.0 were used. For metal ion testing, 10 mM of MgCl2, CaCl2, CdSO4 or MnCl2 was used. The relative activity was obtained by dividing the area of the product peak of the reaction in the UPLC profile by that of the reaction at Tris pH 8.0 and 10 mM of MgCl2.

4.6. Scale-Up, Isolation, and Identification of the Biotransformation Product

To purify the biotransformation metabolite, the reaction was scaled up to a 40 mL reaction mixture containing 20 µg of purified BsUGT398 or BsUGT489, 1 mg/mL of GAA, 10 mM of UDP–glucose, 10 mM of MgCl2, and 50 mM of Tris pH 8.0. After reaction at 30 °C (BsUGT489) or 40 °C (BsUGT398) for 60 min, 40 mL of methanol was added to stop the reaction. The reaction mixture was filtrated through a 0.2 µm nylon membrane, and applied into a preparative YoungLin HPLC system (YL9100, YL Instrument, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea). The system was equipped with a preparative C18 reversed-phase column (Inertsil, 10 µm, 20.0 i.d. × 250 mm, ODS 3, GL Sciences, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The operational conditions for the preparative HPLC were the same as those in UPLC. The elution corresponding to the peak of the metabolite in UPLC was collected, concentrated under vacuum, and then lyophilized. Finally, 15.1 mg and 37.6 mg of compound (1) were obtained from the BsUGT398 and BsUGT489 biotransformation, respectively, and the structure of the compound was confirmed with NMR and mass spectrometry analysis. The mass spectrometry analysis was performed on a Finnigan LCQ Duo mass spectrometer (ThermoQuest Corp., San Jose, CA, USA) with electrospray ionization (ESI). For the NMR experiments, purified samples quantities ranged from 4 mg to 8 mg and were dissolved in 400 µL pyridine-d5, and 1H- and 13C-NMR, and distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer (DEPT), heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC), heteronuclear multiple bond connectivity (HMBC), correlation spectroscopy (COSY), and nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV-700 NMR spectrometer (Bruker Corp., Billerica, MA, USA) at ambient temperature. Standard pulse sequences and parameters from the Bruker library were used for the NMR experiments, and all chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm, δ).

4.7. Phylogenetic Analysis of GTs from B. subtilis ATCC 6633

The unrooted phylogenetic tree of these candidate GT protein sequences was constructed with the maximum likelihood method, using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA X) software [24] with 500 bootstrap replications, the general reversible mitochondrial model [23], and partial deletion.

5. Conclusions

Two new BsUGTs from B. subtilis ATCC 6633 were identified as transferring a glucose moiety to GAA, producing a new triterpenoid glucoside, GAA-15-O-β-glucoside. More than 10,000 microbial GT genes have been deposited in the CAZy database. However, less than 1% of these GT genes have been functionally characterized. The two BsUGTs were newly identified with novel triterpenoid glycosylation activity. The two B. subtilis BsUGTs are the only identified GTs with glycosylation activity toward Ganoderma triterpenoids. Thus, the present study has developed a novel biotransformation system which might be applied to numerous Ganoderma triterpenoids to create many new Ganoderma triterpenoid glucosides in the future.

Abbreviations

GAA Ganoderic acid A
GT Glycosyltransferase
GT1 Glycosyltransferase family 1
UDP Uridine diphosphate
UGT Uridine diphosphate-dependent glycosyltransferases
Open in a new tab

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/11/3469/s1. Table S1: Nucleotide sequences of the primers used for amplification of GT1 in the present study. Figure S1: UPLC of the 24 h fermentation broth using the B. subtilis ATCC 6633 strain without the addition of GAA. Figure S2: Expression of BsUGT398 and BsUGT489 from B. subtilis ATCC 6633 in E. coli. Figure S3. The 1H-NMR (700 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT398. Figure S4. The 13C-NMR (176 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT398. Figure S5. The DEPT-90 and DEPT-135 (176 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT398. Figure S6. The HSQC (700 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT398. Figure S7. The HMBC (700 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT398. Figure S8. The 1H-1H COSY (700 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT398. Figure S9. The NOESY (700 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT398. Figure S10. The 1H-NMR (700 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT489. Figure S11. The 13C-NMR (176 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT489. Figure S12. The DEPT-90 and DEPT-135 (176 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT489. Figure S13. The HSQC (700 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT489. Figure S14. The HMBC (700 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT489. Figure S15. The 1H-1H COSY (700 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT489. Figure S16. The NOESY (700 MHz, pyridine-d5) spectrum of metabolite derived from GAA biotransformation by BsUGT489.

Click here for additional data file. (5.4MB, zip)

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.-S.C.; data curation, C.-M.C., T.-Y.W., K.-Y.W., J.-Y.W., and T.-S.C.; methodology, C.-M.C., T.-Y.W., K.-Y.W., J.-Y.W., and T.-S.C.; project administration, T.-S.C.; writing—original draft, C.-M.C., T.-Y.W., J.-Y.W., and T.-S.C.; writing—review and editing, C.-M.C., T.-Y.W., J.-Y.W., and T.-S.C.

Funding

This research was financially supported by grants from the National Scientific Council of Taiwan (Project No. MOST 107-2221-E-024-005-).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Shah S.A.A., Tan H.L., Sultan S., Faridz M.A.B.M., Shah M.A.B.M., Nurfazilah S., Hussain M. Microbial-catalyzed biotransformation of multifunctional triterpenoids derived from phytonutrients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014;15:12027–12060. doi: 10.3390/ijms150712027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sultana N., Saify Z.S. Enzymatic biotransformation of terpenes as bioactive agents. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2013;28:1113–1128. doi: 10.3109/14756366.2012.727411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Muffler K., Leipold D., Scheller M.C., Haas C., Steingroewer J., Bley T., Neuhaus H.E., Mirata M.A., Schrader J., Ulber R. Biotransformation of triterpenes. Process Biochem. 2011;46:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Parra A., Rivas F., Garcia-Granados A., Martinez A. Microbial transformation of triterpenoids. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem. 2009;6:307–320. doi: 10.2174/157019309789371569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wu J.W., Zhao W., Zhong J.J. Biotechnological production and application of ganoderic acids. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010;87:457–466. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2576-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xia Q., Zhang H., Sun X., Zhao H., Wu L., Zhu D., Yang G., Shao Y., Zhang X., Mao X., et al. A comprehensive review of the structure elucidation and biological activity of triterpenoids from Ganoderma spp. Molecules. 2014;19:17478–17535. doi: 10.3390/molecules191117478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kubota T., Asaka Y. Structures of ganoderic acid A and B, two new lanostane type bitter triterpenes from Ganoderma lucidum (FR.) Karst. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1982;65:611–619. doi: 10.1002/hlca.19820650221. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jiang J., Grieb B., Thyagarajan A., Sliva D. Ganoderic acids suppress growth and invasive behavior of breast cancer cells by modulating AP-1 and NF-kB signaling. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2008;21:577–584. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yao X., Li G., Xu H., Lu C. Inhibition of the JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway by ganoderic acid A enhances chemosensitivity of HepG2 cells to cisplatin. Planta Med. 2012;78:1740–1748. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang X., Sun D., Tai J., Wang L. Ganoderic acid A inhibits proliferation and invasion, and promotes apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017;16:3894–3900. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Akihisa T., Nakamura Y., Tagata M., Tokuba H., Yasukawa K., Uchiyama E., Suzukli T., Kimura Y. Anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor-promoting effects of triterpene acids and sterols from the fungus Ganoderma lucidum. Chem. Biod. 2007;4:224–231. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200790027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koyama K., Imaizumi T., Akiba M., Kinoshita K., Takahashi K., Suzuki A., Yano S., Horie S., Watanabe K., Naoi Y. Antinociceptive components of Ganoderma lucidum. Planta Med. 1997;63:224–227. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhu M., Chang Q., Wong L.K., Chong F.S., Li R.C. Triterpene antioxidants from Ganoderma lucidum. Phytother. Res. 1999;13:529–531. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1573(199909)13:6<529::AID-PTR481>3.0.CO;2-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chang T.S., Chiang C.M., Siao Y.Y., Wu J.Y. Sequential biotransformation of antcin K by Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633. Catalysts. 2018;8:349. doi: 10.3390/catal8090349. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tiwari P., Sangwan R.S., Sangwan NS. Plant secondary metabolism linked glycosyltransferases: An update on expanding knowledge and scopes. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016;34:716–739. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim B.G., Yang S.M., Kim S.Y., Cha M.N., Ahn J.H. Biosynthesis and production of glycosylated flavonoids in Escherichia coli: Current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;99:2979–2988. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6504-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hofer B. Recent developments in the enzymatic O-glycosylation of flavonoids. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;100:4269–4281. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7465-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.CAZy Database. [(accessed on 10 October 2018)]; Available online: www.cazy.org.
  • 19.Dai L., Li J., Yang J., Zhu Y., Men Y., Zeng Y., Cai Y., Dong C., Dai Z., Zhang X., et al. Use of a promiscuous glycosyltransferase from Bacillus subtilis 168 for the enzymatic synthesis of novel protopanaxtriol-type ginsenosides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017;66:943–949. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dai L., Li J., Yao P., Zhu Y., Men Y., Zeng Y., Yang J., Sun Y. Exploiting the aglycon promiscuity of glycosyltransferase Bs-YjiC from Bacillus subtilis and its application in synthesis of glycosides. J. Biotechnol. 2017;248:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liang H., Hu Z., Zhang T., Gong T., Chen J., Zhu P., Li Y., Yang J. Production of a bioactive unnatural ginsenoside by metabolically engineered yeasts based on a new UDP-glycosyltransferase from Bacillus subtilis. Metab. Eng. 2017;44:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2017.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang D.D., Jin Y., Wang C., Kim Y.J., Perez J.E.J., Baek N.I., Mathiyalagan R., Markus J., Yang D.C. Rare ginsenoside Ia synthesized from F1 by cloning and overexpression of the UDP-glycosyltransferase gene from Bacillus subtilis: Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro melanogenesis inhibition activity in BL6B16 cells. J. Ginseng Res. 2018;42:42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2016.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Adachi J., Hasegawa M. Model of amino acid substitution in proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 1996;42:459–468. doi: 10.1007/BF02498640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C., Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018;35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chiang C.M., Wang T.Y., Yang S.Y., Wu J.Y., Chang T.S. Production of new isoflavone glucosides from glycosylation of 8-hydroxydaidzein by glycosyltransferase from Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633. Catalysts. 2018;8:349. doi: 10.3390/catal8090387. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ünligil U., Rini J.M. Glycosyltransferase structure and mechanism. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000;10:510–517. doi: 10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00124-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lariviere L., Gueguen-Chaignon V., Morera S. Crystal structures of the T4 phage b-glucosyltransferase and the D100A mutant in complex with UDP-glucose: Glucose binding and identification of the catalytic base for a direct displacement mechanism. J. Mol. Biol. 2003;330:1077–1086. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00635-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chang T.S., Chiang C.M., Wang T.Y., Lee C.H., Lee Y.W., Wu J.Y. New triterpenoid from novel triterpenoid 15-O-glycosylation on ganoderic acid A by intestinal bacteria of zebrafish. Molecules. 2018;23:2345. doi: 10.3390/molecules23092345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang W.W., Xu S.H., Zhao Y.Z., Zhang C., Zhang Y.Y., Yu B.Y., Zhang J. Microbial hydroxylation and glycosylation of pentacyclic triterpenes as inhibitors on tissue factor procoagulant activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017;27:1026–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.12.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Moulis C., Andre I., Remaud-Simeon M. GH13 amylosucrases and GH70 branching sucrases, atypical enzymes in their respective families. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016;73:2661–2679. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2244-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (5.4MB, zip)

Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES