Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecular Oncology logoLink to Molecular Oncology
. 2018 Oct 26;12(12):2042–2054. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12358

Nogo‐B promotes tumor angiogenesis and provides a potential therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hao Cai 1, Hexige Saiyin 1, Xing Liu 1,3, Dingding Han 1,4, Guoqing Ji 1, Bo Qin 1, Jie Zuo 1, Suqin Shen 1, Wenbo Yu 1, Jiaxue Wu 1,2,✉, Yanhua Wu 1,✉, Long Yu 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6275258  PMID: 30019429

Abstract

Tumor angiogenesis is one of the hallmarks of cancer as well as an attractive target for cancer therapy. Characterization of novel pathways that act in parallel with the VEGF/VEGFR axis to promote tumor angiogenesis may provide insights into novel anti‐angiogenic therapeutic targets. We found that the expression level of Nogo‐B is positively correlated with tumor vessel density in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While Nogo‐B depletion inhibited tumor angiogenesis, Nogo‐B overexpression promoted tumor angiogenesis in a tumor xenograft subcutaneous model of the human HCC cell line. Mechanically, Nogo‐B regulates tumor angiogenesis based on its association with integrin αvβ3 and activation of focal adhesion kinase. Moreover, Nogo‐B antibody successfully abolished the function of Nogo‐B in tumor angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Collectively, our results strongly suggest that Nogo‐B is an important tumor angiogenic factor and blocking Nogo‐B selectively inhibits tumor angiogenesis.

Keywords: blocking antibody, hepatocellular carcinoma, integrin, Nogo‐B, tumor angiogenesis

Abbreviations

cisPTase

cis‐prenyltransferase

CLB

cell lysis buffer

CNS

central nervous system

DAPI

4, 6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole

FAK

focal adhesion kinase

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

HUVECs

human umbilical vein endothelial cells

MVA

mean blood vessel area fraction

MVD

mean blood vessel density

PL

polylysine

RTN4

reticulon 4

TMA

tissue microarrays

VEGFR

vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

1. Introduction

Tumor angiogenesis is one of the cancer hallmarks that is shared by almost all types of human solid tumors and has become an attractive target for cancer therapy (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011; Jayson et al., 2016). Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and their cognate receptors (VEGFRs) are the key factors that are not only important for physiological angiogenesis, but also vital for tumor angiogenesis (Ferrara, 2002; Hanahan and Folkman, 1996; Millauer et al., 1994). Not surprisingly, the humanized monoclonal anti‐VEGF‐A antibody bevacizumab, also known as Avastin, has been approved by the FDA as a first‐line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (Willett et al., 2004). Developed later, bevacizumab is widely used to treat many other tumors, such as glioblastoma, non–small‐cell lung cancer, metastatic kidney cancer, and others. However, tumor progression eventually occurs after bevacizumab treatment in many patients with cancer (Casanovas et al., 2005). The limited therapeutic effect of bevacizumab has also been seen in patients with other types of cancers (Bergers and Hanahan, 2008). The clinical observations imply that angiogenic mechanisms beyond the VEGF‐A/VEGFR‐2 axis might exist in different tumor types and/or at various stages of neoplastic progression (Jayson et al., 2016).

Nogo‐B (also named RTN4B/RTN‐XS/Foocen‐M) belongs to the reticulon 4 (RTN4) protein families, which consists of three major splicing isoforms (Nogo‐A, Nogo‐B, and Nogo‐C) with distinct expression patterns (Cai et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2000). Nogo‐A, abundantly expressed in the central nervous system (CNS), is a key negative regulator of axonal regeneration and angiogenesis in CNS (Chen et al., 2000; Walchli et al., 2013). Nogo‐C is highly expressed in skeletal muscle and involved in cardiomyocyte apoptosis (Jia et al., 2016). In contrast, we previously found that Nogo‐B is widely expressed in all normal human tissues, except the liver (Cai et al., 2005). An essential role of Nogo‐B in regulating vascular remodeling was reported in Nogo‐A/B‐deficient mice (Acevedo et al., 2004). Mice deficient in Nogo‐A/B exhibit reduced arteriogenesis and angiogenesis in vivo due to impaired macrophage infiltration (Kondo et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2009). It has been recently demonstrated that Nogo‐B can control vascular function through suppressing endothelial sphingolipid homeostasis (Cantalupo et al., 2015). The function of endogenous Nogo‐B during liver disease or regeneration has also been studied using Nogo‐A/B‐deficient mice. The absence of Nogo‐B ameliorates liver fibrosis and portal hypertension after bile duct ligation (Tashiro et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2011). Nogo‐B was upregulated and further facilitated hepatocyte proliferation and promoted liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy (Gao et al., 2013). Nogo‐B‐positive Kupffer cells facilitate alcoholic liver disease through regulating M1/M2 cell polarization (Park et al., 2017).

More recently, we have reported that the expression level of Nogo‐B was upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and Nogo‐B deficiency suppressed the tumor growth and metastasis, suggesting that Nogo‐B plays an important role in HCC development (Zhu et al., 2017). Here, we further demonstrated that the expression level of Nogo‐B was positively correlated with tumor vessel density in HCC. We also provide evidences that Nogo‐B is a positive regulator of tumor angiogenesis in vivo, and anti‐Nogo‐B antibody inhibits tumor growth in vivo via suppressing tumor angiogenesis, suggesting that Nogo‐B is a potential therapeutic target for tumor angiogenesis.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Tumor specimens

Surgical specimens of HCC, including tumor tissues and their adjacent nontumorous liver tissues, were collected from Zhongshan Hospital (Fudan University, Shanghai, China). Most specimens were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. This work was accomplished with the approval of the Ethics Committee of School of Life Sciences of Fudan University according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consents were obtained from all patients to approve the use of their tissues for research purposes.

2.2. Tissue microarrays (TMA) analysis

Matched pairs of tumor samples and adjacent normal tissues from HCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, renal clear cell carcinoma, rectal tubular adenocarcinoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma, and lung squamous cell carcinoma were used to construct a TMA (Shanghai Biochip Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China). In brief, sections (4 μm thickness, 1 or 2 mm diameter) were taken from individual paraffin‐embedded tissues and precisely arrayed on 3‐aminopropyltriethoxysilane–coated slides for subsequent staining with an anti‐Nogo‐B antibody.

2.3. Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin‐embedded specimens were cut into 5‐μm‐thick sections, deparaffinized, and rehydrated through a decreasing ethanol gradient. Endogenous peroxidase was first blocked with H2O2. After BSA blocking, slides were incubated with anti‐Nogo‐B (1 : 200 dilution; Santa Cruz, Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or anti‐CD34 antibody (1 : 100 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), which was followed by incubation with biotinylated secondary antibody (1 : 100 dilution; Boster, Wuhan, China). The presence of the avidin–biotin complex was finally revealed with diaminobenzidine. Quantitative analysis of the Nogo‐B intensity, CD34‐positive blood vessel density, and blood vessel area was performed using imagej software.

2.4. Cell lines, cell culture, and cell transfection

SMMC‐7721 was purchased from the Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). SK‐Hep1, CHO, and HEK293T cell lines were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). All cells are maintained in Dulbecco's modified essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. G418 (800 μg·mL−1; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to maintain stable SMMC‐7721 lines. Primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were purchased from ScienCell (Carlsbad, CA, USA) and maintained in M200 medium supplemented with 2% LSGS (Cascade Biologics, Portland, OR, USA), penicillin (50 U·mL−1), and streptomycin (50 mg·mL−1). Cells in passages 3–8 were used in the experiments. The above cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells at 80% confluency were transfected with the indicated plasmids or small interference RNA (siRNA) using Lipo2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

2.5. Small interference RNA screen and lentivirus infection

Nogo‐B siRNA1 (S1; forward seq: 5ʹ‐UUGGCACAGAUAGAUCAUUAU‐3ʹ), siRNA2 (S2; forward seq: 5ʹ‐UUCAGAAUCUAUGGACUGAAU‐3ʹ), and nonsilencing control (NS; forward seq: 5ʹ‐UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGU‐3ʹ) were designed and constructed into lentiviral shRNA plasmid at Shanghai Genechem Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The corresponding lentiviral particles were packaged and designated as LRS1, LRS2, and LNS, respectively. SMMC‐7721 cells cultured in 96‐well plates were infected with lentivirus at a multiplicity of infection of 10. The silencing effect was examined by immunoblot 72 h after infection.

2.6. Human xenograft subcutaneous tumor assay

This work was accomplished with the approval of the Ethics Committee of School of Life Sciences, Fudan University. Animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Shanghai Municipality, PR China. The protocol was approved by the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Permit Number: SYXK 2015‐0006).

Six‐week‐old female athymic nude mice were obtained from Shanghai Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (SLAC, Shanghai, China), and maintained on standard laboratory chow under a 12 h : 12 h light–dark schedule with free access to food and water. Cultured cells were harvested and washed with the culture medium without serum and resuspended in sterile 1× PBS before tumor implantation. Three to five million viable cells in 200 μL were subcutaneously injected into the right flanks of mice. Six to eight animals were used in each group. The tumor size was measured with a caliper, and the mice were weighed every 3 days. The tumor volume was calculated using the formula of length × width2 × 0.5. Four weeks after injection, animals were sacrificed by neck dislocation to minimize suffering, and the tumors were collected and weighed. Fresh tumor samples were fixed in freshly prepared 4% PFA overnight before further analysis.

2.7. Immunofluorescence staining

Xenografted tumor samples were fixed in freshly prepared 4% PFA overnight. Frozen samples were cut into 4‐μm slides and hydrated. Immunofluorescence staining was performed as previously described. After blocking with 5% BSA and 10% donkey serum, slides were incubated with anti‐CD31/PECAM antibody (1 : 20; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) or anti‐phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (FAK) antibody (1 : 20; Abcam) overnight at 4 °C, which was followed by Cy3‐conjugated secondary antibody (1 : 100; Zymed Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA, USA). The slides were counterstained with DAPI (4, 6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). All images were acquired using a LEICA DC 500 camera on a microscope equipped with LEICA DMRA2 fluorescent optics (LEICA, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). Quantitative analysis of the CD31‐positive blood vessel density and phosphorylated FAK‐positive area was performed using imagej software.

2.8. Cell adhesion assay

Recombinant Nogo‐B was expressed in the Pichia expression system (Invitrogen) according to K. Sreekrishna's protocol. His‐tagged Nogo‐B in cell lysate was further purified with a Ni‐NTA Spin Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. HUVECs were used in the cell adhesion assay. A 96‐well plate was coated with proteins diluted in phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) at 4 °C overnight and then blocked with BSA. Cells were harvested with EDTA/trypsin and resuspended in serum‐free medium at 2 × 105 cells·mL−1. Then, 100 μL of the cell suspension was plated in each well. After 1‐h incubation at 37 °C, cells were extensively washed three times with warmed PBS. Adherent cells were quantified using the MTS assay (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA), and the absorbance was measured with a microtiter reader (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) at 450 nm. In the cell adhesion blockade assay, resuspended HUVECs were incubated with indicated antibodies or peptides before they were replated into wells.

2.9. FAK phosphorylation assay

Cells adherent on dishes in the spreading assay were lysed on ice with cell lysis buffer (CLB; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Cell Signaling), PMSF, and sodium orthovanadate. The total protein levels were determined, and the same amounts were used in immunoprecipitation. Then, 1 μg of anti‐FAK antibody was added into cell lysate and incubated for 4 h at 4 °C, which was followed by incubation with Protein A/G agarose beads for another 45 min at 4 °C. The immunocomplexes were washed with the CLB containing additional PMSF and sodium orthovanadate four times before western blot analysis. For immunoblotting, blots were incubated with anti‐FAK antibody (1 : 500; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and anti‐tyrosine/phosphorylation antibody (1 : 500; Merck), respectively.

2.10. Tube formation assay

Matrigel (BD Biosciences) was used to coat the wells of 96‐well plates (50 μL per well) and was allowed to polymerize at 37 °C for 1 h. HUVECs were harvested and suspended in serum‐free medium at 2.4 × 105 cells·mL−1. Cells (50 μL) were then mixed with either Nogo‐B, VEGF (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, CT, USA) as a positive control, or PBS as a negative control diluted in serum‐free medium (50 μL) before they were seeded onto the Matrigel surface. After 6–10 h, HUVECs were photographed and the extent of tube formation was analyzed using imagej software.

2.11. In vivo Matrigel angiogenesis assay

Recombinant proteins were incorporated in Matrigel (BD Biosciences) with heparin sulfate (40 U; Sigma). Six‐week‐old female C57BL/6 mice (SLAC) were subcutaneously injected with 0.5 mL of Matrigel in combination with Nogo‐B, VEGF as a positive control, or PBS as a negative control. Mice were sacrificed after 7–10 days. The Matrigel plugs were dissected and photographed. Then, the specimens were fixed in freshly prepared 4% PFA overnight and further subjected to immunohistochemical staining using anti‐CD31/PECAM antibody (1 : 20; BD Biosciences). Quantitative analysis of the CD31‐positive blood vessel area was performed using imagej software.

2.12. Antibody generation and purification

A peptide corresponding to amino acids 44–58 of human Nogo‐B was synthesized at China Peptides Corporation (Shanghai, China) and used to immunize mice to produce monoclonal anti‐Nogo‐B antibody through the hybridoma technique at AbMax Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). In brief, 4‐ to 8‐week‐old Balb/c mice were immunized with 500 μg of synthesized Nogo‐B peptide. Serum titers were assessed with the ELISA before the spleen cells were fused with SP2/0 cells. Hybridomas were selected, and their culture supernatants were screened for the presence of antibody through ELISA. Positive hybridomas were further cloned using the limiting dilution technique. Monoclonal antibody in the hybridoma clone culture supernatant was purified using protein A Sepharose columns (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

2.13. Statistical analysis

Group‐level differences were evaluated through a two‐tailed Student's t‐test. The relationship between the MVD/MVA and Nogo‐B intensity was analyzed using a two‐tailed Pearson correlation. P < 0.05 (*) was considered significant, and P < 0.01 (**) was considered highly significant.

3. Results

3.1. Nogo‐B expression correlates with high blood vessel density in human HCC tissues

More recently, we have found that the expression level of Nogo‐B was upregulated in HCC specimens (Zhu et al., 2017). As Nogo‐B is a regulator of angiogenesis in mice (Acevedo et al., 2004), Nogo‐B may play an important role in tumor angiogenesis. To test this hypothesis, we firstly examined the expression levels of Nogo‐B and CD34, a marker of vascular, in two TMA containing 211 cases of HCC specimens by immunohistochemical staining using anti‐Nogo‐B and anti‐CD34 antibodies, respectively (Fig. S1). Representative photographs of HCC specimens with staining for Nogo‐B and CD34 are shown in Fig. 1A. Tumor blood vessel formation was obviously increased in HCC tissues with higher expression of Nogo‐B compared with tumors with low Nogo‐B expression. Moreover, statistical analysis also revealed that Nogo‐B expression was positively correlated with both blood vessel density (MVD) and blood vessel area fraction (MVA) in HCC tissues (Pearson correlation coefficient; P < 0.01) (Fig. 1B,C). These results suggested that Nogo‐B may play an important role in tumor angiogenesis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Nogo‐B expression correlates with tumor angiogenesis in human HCC. (A) Representative photographs of immunohistochemistry analysis of Nogo‐B and CD34 expression in a human HCC TMA. Scale bar, 100 μm. (B, C) The relationship between the CD34‐positive blood vessel density (MVD) (B) and blood vessel area fraction (MVA) (C) with Nogo‐B expression in 211 HCC cases. Statistical significance was evaluated by Spearman's correlation.

3.2. Overexpression of Nogo‐B in HCC cells promotes tumor angiogenesis in vivo

To investigate the function of Nogo‐B in tumor angiogenesis, we generated stably expressed Myc‐tagged Nogo‐B SMMC‐7721 cells. Nogo‐B‐overexpressed cells display dramatically increased tumor growth, tumor size, and tumor weight in vivo after subcutaneous injection into nude mice compared with control cells (Fig. 2A–C). Next, we examined the blood vessel density in the tumor histological sections derived from control cells or Nogo‐B‐overexpressed cells by immunohistochemical staining using anti‐CD31 antibody. As shown in Fig. 2D, tumor sections derived from Nogo‐B‐overexpressing cells exhibited stronger immunoreactivity of anti‐CD31 antibody than those from the control cells. Quantitatively, the mean CD31‐positive MVD in Nogo‐B‐derived tumor sections was increased by ~ 30% (P < 0.01, t‐test) compared with control tumor sections (Fig. 2E). These results further indicate that Nogo‐B might be involved in regulating tumor angiogenesis in vivo.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Nogo‐B overexpression promotes tumor growth and angiogenesis. (A) Measurement of tumor size in nude mice engrafted with SMMC‐7721 cells stably expressing Nogo‐B (7721‐Nogo‐B) or control cells (7721‐Ctl). Error bars represent the SD (n = 8, **P < 0.01). Western blot analysis of exogenous Nogo‐B expression in two cell sublines is shown in the upper panel. β‐actin serves as a loading control. (B) Measurement of the xenograft tumor weight. The error bar represents the SD (n = 8, **P < 0.01). (C) Photographs of xenograft tumors dissected from the mice as indicated. Scale bars, 10 mm. (D) Immunohistochemistry with a CD31/PECAM‐1 antibody of tumor sections. Small rectangles in the upper panel (scale bars, 200 μm) are shown with higher magnification in the bottom panel (scale bars, 50 μm). (E) Quantification of MVD in tumor sections randomly selected by morphometry. The error bar represents the SD (n = 5, *P < 0.05).

3.3. Knockdown of Nogo‐B in HCC cells suppresses tumor angiogenesis in vivo

Next, we examined the role of endogenous Nogo‐B in tumor angiogenesis. To this end, a lentivirus‐based RNA interference approach was used to specifically silence endogenous Nogo‐B in SMMC‐7721 cells. Two siRNA species, siRNA1 targeting the coding region and siRNA2 targeting the 3ʹ‐UTR of Nogo‐B mRNA, were designed, and two corresponding lentivirus‐based expression constructs, LRS1 and LRS2, were subsequently generated. A nonspecific control siRNA and its lentivirus expression vector (LNS) were also designed. Consistent with the results of stable expression of Nogo‐B, knocking down Nogo‐B exhibited suppressive effect in HCC cell growth in vivo (Fig. 3A–C). At the time of animal euthanasia, the 7721‐LS1 and 7721‐LS2 tumors showed a remarkable decrease in the tumor size of 67% and 78% (P < 0.01, t‐test), respectively, compared with control tumors. Consistent with these findings, the tumor weights of the 7721‐LS1 and 7721‐LS2 groups were decreased by 55% and 73% (P < 0.01, t‐test), respectively.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Knockdown of endogenous Nogo‐B suppresses tumor growth and angiogenesis. (A) Measurement of the tumor size in nude mice engrafted with SMMC‐7721 cells infected with lentivirus expressing shNogo‐B‐1 (7721‐LS1), shNogo‐B‐2 (7721‐LS2), or nonsilencing shRNA control (7721‐LNS). Error bars represent the SD (n = 6; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). Western blot analysis of endogenous Nogo‐B expression in three cell sublines is shown in the upper panel. β‐actin serves as a loading control. (B) Measurement of the xenograft tumor weight. The error bar represents the SD (n = 6, **P < 0.01). (C) Photographs of tumors dissected from nude mice engrafted with 7721‐LRS1, 7721‐LRS2, and control cells (7721‐LNS). Scale bars, 10 mm. (D) Immunohistochemical staining with a CD31/PECAM‐1 antibody of tumor sections. Small rectangles in the upper panel (scale bars, 200 μm) are shown with higher magnification in the bottom panel (scale bars, 50 μm). (E) Quantification of the MVD in tumor sections randomly selected by morphometry. The error bar represents the SD (n = 5, *P < 0.05).

Again, immunohistochemistry of CD31/PECAM was performed to examine whether endogenous Nogo‐B knockdown affects tumor angiogenesis. As shown in Fig. 3D, histological sections from 7721‐LRS1‐ and 7721‐LRS2‐derived tumors had much weaker immunoreactivity with the anti‐CD31/PECAM antibody. Quantitatively, the mean CD31‐positive vessel densities in tumors derived from Nogo‐B‐knockdown cells were significantly decreased by 41% and 49% (P < 0.01, t‐test), respectively (Fig. 3E). These results provide further evidence that Nogo‐B probably plays an important role in HCC tumor growth and angiogenesis.

3.4. Recombinant Nogo‐B regulates cell adhesion in an integrin αvβ3‐dependent manner

The recombinant Nogo‐B was expressed and purified to analyze the function in angiogenesis. Integrins are a large family of cell‐surface receptors that play critical roles in mediating several angiogenic steps, including cell adhesion and cell migration. Integrin‐mediated cell adhesion is sensitive to Ca2+ sequestration and can be blocked by EDTA treatment (Hynes, 2002). It is found that EDTA treatment can dramatically inhibit the function of Nogo‐B on the cell adhesion of HUVECs, while it did not inhibit adherence to the polylysine (PL)‐coated surfaces (Fig. 4A). Moreover, the antibody specific to integrin αvβ3 (LM609), but not integrin αvβ5 (P1F6) or the β1 family (P4C10), significantly inhibited the adherence of HUVECs to Nogo‐B‐coated plates (Fig. 4B). Next, the CHO cell line, which lacks endogenous integrin β3 expression, was used to determine whether integrin αvβ3 is sufficient to mediate Nogo‐B‐regulated cell adhesion. Stable CHO cell sublines expressing myc‐tagged integrin β3 were generated (Fig. S2a), which could form an αvβ3 heterodimer with an endogenous αv subunit on the cell membrane, as confirmed by flow cytometric analysis using the anti‐integrin αvβ3 antibody (Fig. S2b). As expected, only β3‐overexpressing CHO clones, but not control CHO cells, could adhere to Nogo‐B‐coated surfaces (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Recombinant Nogo‐B promotes cell adhesion through interacting with integrin αvβ3. (A) Effects of EDTA on HUVEC adhesion. Cells were incubated with EDTA or PBS before they were replated on Nogo‐B‐coated surfaces. (B) The cell adhesion blockade assay to investigate the effects of integrin‐neutralizing antibodies on Nogo‐B‐induced HUVEC adhesion. Cells were incubated with neutralizing anti‐integrin antibodies as indicated before they were replated on Nogo‐B‐coated surfaces. LM609, anti‐integrin αvβ3 antibody; P1F6, anti‐integrin αvβ5 antibody; and P4C10, anti‐integrin β1 antibody. Polylysine was used as an integrin‐independent control. The error bar represents the SD (n = 3, **P < 0.01). (C) Effect of Nogo‐B expression on CHO cell adhesion. Two CHO control cell lines (CHO‐ctl‐1, CHO‐ctl‐2) and two CHO stable cell lines expressing integrin αvβ3 (CHO‐αvβ3‐1, CHO‐αvβ3‐2) were replated on the Nogo‐B‐coated surface, and cell adherence was determined at different time points. The error bar represents the SD (n = 3, **P < 0.01). (D) FAK phosphorylation assay. The levels of indicated phosphorylated and total protein were detected in whole cell lysate (WCL) from cells adhered to PL, Nogo‐B, or vitronectin (VN)‐coated surfaces or cells in suspension (NAD). (E) Time course studies of different protein phosphorylation for cells grown on Nogo‐B‐coated surfaces. (F) FAK phosphorylation analysis after HUVEC was blocked by integrin αvβ3 neutralizing antibody.

Upon ligand occupancy, integrins transduce outside signals into cells to initiate cytoskeletal re‐organization via recruiting protein kinases, scaffolding molecules, and cytoskeleton components to organize the focal adhesion complex (Miranti and Brugge, 2002). Therefore, we sought to determine whether Nogo‐B regulates the actin cytoskeletal structure and focal contact remodeling by immunoblot with specific antibodies. As shown in Fig. 4D, attachment of cells to Nogo‐B, but not negative control PL, increased the intensity of several proteins reacted with the anti‐p.Tyr antibody, which was similar to the attachment to vitronectin, the known ligand for integrin αvβ3. Compared with control treatment, tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and phosphorylation of its downstream factors, ERK1/2 and Akt, are also induced by Nogo‐B and vitronectin treatment. Furthermore, in a time‐gradient period, FAK, ERK1/2, and Akt phosphorylation peaked at 60 min after cells were replated on Nogo‐B‐coated plates (Fig. 4E). Moreover, the phosphorylation of FAK induced by Nogo‐B was blocked when HUVEC was treated with integrin αvβ3‐neutralizing antibody (Fig. 4F). These results together suggest that the interaction between Nogo‐B and integrin αvβ3 could activate the FAK‐initiated signaling pathway, strengthening the cell adhesion and migration properties.

3.5. Nogo‐B antibody suppressed tumor angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo

How tumor vessels are formed and remodeled is of great interest for developing effective anti‐angiogenic drugs to restrict tumor growth (Jayson et al., 2016). After we revealed the potential function of Nogo‐B in regulating tumor angiogenesis, we sought to determine whether blocking Nogo‐B can be a novel therapeutic strategy for HCC. To this end, a monoclonal antibody against Nogo‐B, designated as 6F2, was generated by the hybridoma technique. The 6F2 epitope resides within the N‐terminal domain (44–58 aa) of Nogo‐B. The effects of 6F2 on Nogo‐B‐mediated cellular function were first examined with the cell adhesion assay, tube formation assay, and Matrigel plug assay. As shown in Fig. 5A–C, 6F2 treatment attenuated Nogo‐B‐induced cell adhesion, the tube spreading area, and the CD31‐positive blood vessel area in Matrigel plug in a dose‐dependent manner, respectively.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Anti‐Nogo‐B antibody 6F2 suppresses angiogenesis in vitro. (A) The cell adhesion blockage assay in which HUVECs were incubated with mAb 6F2 before they were replated on Nogo‐B‐coated surfaces. The error bar represents the SD (n = 3, **P < 0.01). (B) The tube formation blockage assay in which HUVECs were incubated with both recombinant Nogo‐B and mAb 6F2 before they were replated on Matrigel‐coated surfaces. Quantitative analysis was performed by counting the tube area fraction. The error bar represents the SD (n = 3, **P < 0.01). (C) Matrigel inhibition assay in which BALB/c mice were injected with Matrigel containing both recombinant Nogo‐B and mAb 6F2. Quantitative analysis was performed by counting the CD31‐positive blood vessel area fraction. The error bar represents the SD (n = 3, **P < 0.01).

Next, the effect of 6F2 in tumor and tumor angiogenesis was examined in vivo. SMMC‐7721 wild‐type cells were subcutaneously injected into nude mice, and animals were then received 6F2 (20 mg per kg of body weight) or vehicle by i.p. injection. As shown in Fig. 6A–C, both the tumor size (73%) and tumor weight (43%) (P < 0.01, t‐test) were significantly decreased in 6F2‐treated mice compared with vehicle treatment. Anti‐CD31 immunostaining further revealed that 6F2 attenuated the blood vessel formation in xenograft tumors, leading to a remarkable decrease in the tumor blood vessel density (Fig. 6D,E). More specifically, the anti‐phosphorylated FAK immunosignal area was significantly suppressed by 6F2 treatment (Fig. 6F,G), indicating an inhibitory effect of 6F2 in Nogo‐B‐induced signaling transduction. These results demonstrated that Nogo‐B antibody can attenuate tumor angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that it might be a potential therapeutic drug for HCC.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Anti‐Nogo‐B antibody 6F2 suppresses angiogenesis in vivo. (A, B) Measurement of the tumor size (A) and tumor weight (B) in nude mice engrafted with SMMC‐7721 wild‐type cells given 6F2 (20 mg per kg of body weight) or vehicle by i.p. injection. Error bars represent the SD (n = 8; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). (C) Photographs of tumors dissected from nude mice engrafted with SMMC‐7721 wild‐type cells that received 6F2 or vehicle by i.p. injection. Scale bars, 10 mm. (D) Immunohistochemical staining with a CD31/PECAM‐1 antibody of tumor sections. Small rectangles (scale bars, 200 μm) are shown at higher magnification in the inner panel (scale bars, 50 μm). (E) Quantification of the MVD in tumor sections randomly selected by morphometry. The error bar represents the SD (n = 5, *P < 0.05). (F) Representative photographs of tumor sections co‐immunostained with pFAK, CD31, and nuclear stain. Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Quantification of the randomly pFAK‐positive area fraction selected with morphometry. The error bar represents the SD (n = 5, *P < 0.05).

4. Discussion

Most studies on the Nogo family have centered on their roles in axonal regeneration until the function of Nogo‐B in regulating endothelial cell activities and vascular function was reported in mice (Acevedo et al., 2004). The role of Nogo‐B in human cardiovascular disease has been further documented (Bullard et al., 2008). On the other hand, the function of Nogo‐B in cancer cells has been studied for at least a decade, but inconsistent results have been reported with respect to the pro‐apoptotic function of Nogo‐B and its expression pattern in cancer cells (Li et al., 2001; Oertle et al., 2003). In the beginning of our study, we investigated the expression of Nogo‐B in different cancers, and a consistent upregulated expression pattern of Nogo‐B was observed in all examined cancer types (Fig. S3), suggesting that Nogo‐B may play general and critical functions in tumor development. Given that Nogo‐B is only expressed in the sinusoidal endothelial cells but not in the hepatocytes of normal liver tissue (Fig. S4), we selected HCC cells as our working model for further functional study. We demonstrate that overexpression of Nogo‐B in HCC cells or recombinant Nogo‐B significantly promotes tumor angiogenesis, while inhibition of Nogo‐B via shRNA or neutralizing antibody impedes angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Our finding suggests Nogo‐B as a potential target of anti‐angiogenesis tumor therapy.

After revealing that Nogo‐B functions in vascular remodeling and angiogenesis, the functional receptor of Nogo‐B has been screened individually in several laboratories. NgBR has been characterized as a functional receptor on the endothelial cell surface that is necessary for Nogo‐B stimulated chemotaxis and angiogenesis (Miao et al., 2006). It is now known that NgBR is a subunit of cis‐prenyltransferase (cisPTase), which is required for dolichol monophosphate biosynthesis and protein N‐glycosylation (Harrison et al., 2011). Genetic knockdown of NgBR in zebrafish resulted in an intersomitic vessel defect during embryonic development, and endothelial‐specific knockout of NgBR in mice resulted in vascular development defects and embryonic lethality (Park et al., 2016; Rana et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2010). However, in vivo studies also revealed that the NgBR functions in mouse endothelial cells during embryogenesis are Nogo‐B independent, which strongly suggests that Nogo‐B and NgBR are at least partially functionally different. Similar results have been found in the NgBR liver‐specific knockout mice. NgBR was demonstrated to be a specific negative regulator for hepatic lipogenesis, which is apparently inconsistent with the positive regulatory role of Nogo‐B during liver fibrosis/cirrhosis (Hu et al., 2016).

Some preliminary studies of NgBR expression in tumor cells have also been performed recently, but the results differ for different tumor types. For instance, NgBR was upregulated in breast cancer compared with normal breast tissue and the expression of NgBR promoted the chemoresistance of HCC cells (Dong et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2013). In contrast, association studies demonstrated that the expression of NgBR was negatively correlated with the malignancy grade in invasive ductal breast carcinoma, non–small‐cell lung carcinomas, and malignant melanoma (Calik et al., 2016; Pula et al., 2014a,b). Although these results suggest that NgBR might be involved in tumor development, whether NgBR acts through binding Nogo‐B in tumor cells remains to be investigated.

It is noteworthy that some other novel receptors of Nogo‐B have recently been reported, including PirB, GRAMD4, and SPT, which brings an additional degree of complexity to the molecular mechanism of Nogo‐B (Cantalupo et al., 2015; Kimura et al., 2015; Kondo et al., 2013). For instance, Nogo‐B suppresses the de novo pathway of sphingolipid biosynthesis in endothelial cells through interacting with SPT (the rate‐limiting enzyme of the pathway), but this function is independent on NgBR (Cantalupo et al., 2015). In our study, we demonstrated that Nogo‐B associated with integrin αvβ3, raising a hypothesis that integrin αvβ3 on the surface of endothelial cells is another novel receptor of Nogo‐B during tumor angiogenesis. We also provided evidence that Nogo‐B promoted HUVEC adhesion and activated the FAK‐initiated signaling pathway in an integrin αvβ3‐dependent manner. Integrin αvβ3 was initially believed to be required for pathological angiogenesis (Gasparini et al., 1998; Natali et al., 1997). Previous studies have reported the diametric roles of integrin αvβ3 during tumor angiogenesis, which are due to its promiscuous interactions with different ligands (Hynes, 2002). Our results indicate that Nogo‐B is probably a new pro‐angiogenic ligand of integrin αvβ3. Consistent with our finding, Hu et al. found that the N‐terminal domain of Nogo‐A inhibits cell adhesion and axonal outgrowth through several integrins, including αvβ3 (Hu and Strittmatter, 2008). ER‐resident Nogo‐B protein can not only localize to the plasma membrane but also secrete into extracellular space (Acevedo et al., 2004; Ozkaramanli Gur et al., 2018). Nogo‐B in HCC cells exhibited a consistent distribution in our work, that it can be detected both on HCC cell surface and in the cell culture medium (data not shown). So we hypothesized that Nogo‐B might regulate tumor angiogenesis through directly binding to integrins on endothelial cells’ surface and/or secreting into the extracellular space.

5. Conclusions

The first clinically used angiogenesis inhibitor, bevacizumab, is widely applied to treat several types of cancers (Ferrara et al., 2004). However, the redundancy of angiogenic factors during tumor angiogenesis contributes to resistance to anti‐VEGF therapy (Bergers and Hanahan, 2008; Carmeliet and Jain, 2011; Jayson et al., 2016). It has been suggested that VEGF blockade aggravates hypoxia, which then drives the expression of other angiogenic proteins, such as fibroblast growth factor, angiopoietin‐2, interleukin‐8, among others (Casanovas et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2010; Rigamonti et al., 2014). These factors further contribute to the revascularization and regrowth of tumors. It will be fascinating in the near future to determine the outcome of combining novel anti‐angiogenic agents with traditional anti‐VEGF drugs (Smith et al., 2014). Our present study defines Nogo‐B/integrin as a previously uncharacterized pathway that may function in parallel with the VEGF/VEGFR axis in promoting tumor angiogenesis. The existence of the alternative Nogo‐B/integrin pathway might provide another plausible explanation for the recurrence of many types of tumors after anti‐VEGF therapy as well as represents an attractive target for the development of new effective therapeutics against tumor angiogenesis.

Author contributions

LY and JW conceived the study, designed the experimental strategy, and participated in manuscript preparation. YW carried out in vitro angiogenic assays and mechanism exploration, analyzed all the data, and wrote the manuscript. HC prepared the blocking antibody, and performed the blocking assay and the xenograft tumor assay. HS performed IHC and IF, and was involved in association study and data analysis. XL screened siRNA fragment, established all stable lines, and analyzed cell activity. DH performed IF and the xenograft tumor assay. GJ was involved in experimental design, xenograft tumor assay and data analysis. BQ produced recombinant protein. JZ was involved in in vitro angiogenic assays. SS and WY were involved in data analysis.

Supporting information

Fig. S1. Photographs of two TMAs.

Fig. S2. Establishment of CHO clones stably expressing integrin αvβ3.

Fig. S3. Nogo‐B is remarkably upregulated in different cancers.

Fig. S4. Representative photographs of immunohistochemical Nogo‐B staining in normal liver tissue and HCC.

Click here for additional data file. (753.5KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Peter J. Newman (Blood Center of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI) for providing pcDNA3‐ITGB3 plasmid. We would like to thank Dr George R. Stark (Case Western Reserve University, USA), Dr Junying Yuan (Harvard Medical School, USA), Dr Junjie Chen (Yale University School of Medicine, USA), Dr Qing Yi (Anderson Cancer Center, USA), Dr Haojie Huang (Mayo Clinic, USA), Dr Hongyang Wang (Second Military Medical University, China), and Dr Qiang Yu (Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, China) for their helpful discussions. This work was supported by the National Key Sci‐Tech Special Project of China (2013ZX10002010) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81472619, 31000558, 31501047, 81502059).

Hao Cai, Hexige Saiyin, Xing Liu, Dingding Han, and Guoqing Ji contributed equally to this work

Contributor Information

Jiaxue Wu, Email: jiaxue@fudan.edu.cn.

Yanhua Wu, Email: yanhuawu@fudan.edu.cn.

Long Yu, Email: longyu@fudan.edu.cn.

References

  1. Acevedo L, Yu J, Erdjument‐Bromage H, Miao RQ, Kim JE, Fulton D, Tempst P, Strittmatter SM and Sessa WC (2004) A new role for Nogo as a regulator of vascular remodeling. Nat Med 10, 382–388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergers G and Hanahan D (2008) Modes of resistance to anti‐angiogenic therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 8, 592–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bullard TA, Protack TL, Aguilar F, Bagwe S, Massey HT and Blaxall BC (2008) Identification of Nogo as a novel indicator of heart failure. Physiol Genomics 32, 182–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cai Y, Saiyin H, Lin Q, Zhang P, Tang L, Pan X and Yu L (2005) Identification of a new RTN3 transcript, RTN3‐A1, and its distribution in adult mouse brain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 138, 236–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Calik J, Pula B, Piotrowska A, Wojnar A, Witkiewicz W, Grzegrzolka J, Podhorska‐Okolow M and Dziegiel P (2016) Prognostic significance of NOGO‐A/B and NOGO‐B receptor expression in malignant melanoma – a preliminary study. Anticancer Res 36, 3401–3407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cantalupo A, Zhang Y, Kothiya M, Galvani S, Obinata H, Bucci M, Giordano FJ, Jiang XC, Hla T and Di Lorenzo A (2015) Nogo‐B regulates endothelial sphingolipid homeostasis to control vascular function and blood pressure. Nat Med 21, 1028–1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carmeliet P and Jain RK (2011) Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature 473, 298–307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Casanovas O, Hicklin DJ, Bergers G and Hanahan D (2005) Drug resistance by evasion of antiangiogenic targeting of VEGF signaling in late‐stage pancreatic islet tumors. Cancer Cell 8, 299–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen MS, Huber AB, van der Haar ME, Frank M, Schnell L, Spillmann AA, Christ F and Schwab ME (2000) Nogo‐A is a myelin‐associated neurite outgrowth inhibitor and an antigen for monoclonal antibody IN‐1. Nature 403, 434–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dong C, Zhao B, Long F, Liu Y, Liu Z, Li S, Yang X, Sun D, Wang H, Liu Q et al (2016) Nogo‐B receptor promotes the chemoresistance of human hepatocellular carcinoma via the ubiquitination of p53 protein. Oncotarget 7, 8850–8865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferrara N (2002) VEGF and the quest for tumour angiogenesis factors. Nat Rev Cancer 2, 795–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferrara N, Hillan KJ, Gerber HP and Novotny W (2004) Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti‐VEGF antibody for treating cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 3, 391–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gao L, Utsumi T, Tashiro K, Liu B, Zhang D, Swenson ES and Iwakiri Y (2013) Reticulon 4B (Nogo‐B) facilitates hepatocyte proliferation and liver regeneration in mice. Hepatology 57, 1992–2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gasparini G, Brooks PC, Biganzoli E, Vermeulen PB, Bonoldi E, Dirix LY, Ranieri G, Miceli R and Cheresh DA (1998) Vascular integrin alpha(v)beta3: a new prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 4, 2625–2634. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hanahan D and Folkman J (1996) Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell 86, 353–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hanahan D and Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harrison KD, Park EJ, Gao NG, Kuo A, Rush JS, Waechter CJ, Lehrman MA and Sessa WC (2011) Nogo‐B receptor is necessary for cellular dolichol biosynthesis and protein N‐glycosylation. EMBO J 30, 2490–2500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu F and Strittmatter SM (2008) The N‐terminal domain of Nogo‐A inhibits cell adhesion and axonal outgrowth by an integrin‐specific mechanism. J Neurosci 28, 1262–1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hu W, Zhang W, Chen Y, Rana U, Teng RJ, Duan Y, Liu Z, Zhao B, Foeckler J, Weiler H et al (2016) Nogo‐B receptor deficiency increases liver X receptor alpha nuclear translocation and hepatic lipogenesis through an adenosine monophosphate‐activated protein kinase alpha‐dependent pathway. Hepatology 64, 1559–1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang D, Ding Y, Zhou M, Rini BI, Petillo D, Qian CN, Kahnoski R, Futreal PA, Furge KA and Teh BT (2010) Interleukin‐8 mediates resistance to antiangiogenic agent sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma. Can Res 70, 1063–1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hynes RO (2002) Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 110, 673–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jayson GC, Kerbel R, Ellis LM and Harris AL (2016) Antiangiogenic therapy in oncology: current status and future directions. Lancet 388, 518–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jia S, Qiao X, Ye J, Fang X, Xu C, Cao Y and Zheng M (2016) Nogo‐C regulates cardiomyocyte apoptosis during mouse myocardial infarction. Cell Death Dis 7, e2432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kimura T, Endo S, Inui M, Saitoh S, Miyake K and Takai T (2015) Endoplasmic protein Nogo‐B (RTN4‐B) interacts with GRAMD4 and regulates TLR9‐mediated innate immune responses. J Immunol 194, 5426–5436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kondo Y, Jadlowiec CC, Muto A, Yi T, Protack C, Collins MJ, Tellides G, Sessa WC and Dardik A (2013) The Nogo‐B‐PirB axis controls macrophage‐mediated vascular remodeling. PLoS One 8, e81019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li Q, Qi B, Oka K, Shimakage M, Yoshioka N, Inoue H, Hakura A, Kodama K, Stanbridge EJ and Yutsudo M (2001) Link of a new type of apoptosis‐inducing gene ASY/Nogo‐B to human cancer. Oncogene 20, 3929–3936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Miao RQ, Gao Y, Harrison KD, Prendergast J, Acevedo LM, Yu J, Hu F, Strittmatter SM and Sessa WC (2006) Identification of a receptor necessary for Nogo‐B stimulated chemotaxis and morphogenesis of endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 10997–11002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Millauer B, Shawver LK, Plate KH, Risau W and Ullrich A (1994) Glioblastoma growth inhibited in vivo by a dominant‐negative Flk‐1 mutant. Nature 367, 576–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Miranti CK and Brugge JS (2002) Sensing the environment: a historical perspective on integrin signal transduction. Nat Cell Biol 4, E83–E90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Natali PG, Hamby CV, Felding‐Habermann B, Liang B, Nicotra MR, Di Filippo F, Giannarelli D, Temponi M and Ferrone S (1997) Clinical significance of alpha(v)beta3 integrin and intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 expression in cutaneous malignant melanoma lesions. Can Res 57, 1554–1560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Oertle T, Merkler D and Schwab ME (2003) Do cancer cells die because of Nogo‐B? Oncogene 22, 1390–1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ozkaramanli Gur D, Guzel S, Akyuz A, Alpsoy S and Guler N (2018) The role of novel cytokines in inflammation: defining peripheral artery disease among patients with coronary artery disease. Vasc Med. 10.1177/1358863X18763096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Park EJ, Grabinska KA, Guan ZQ and Sessa WC (2016) NgBR is essential for endothelial cell glycosylation and vascular development. EMBO Rep 17, 167–177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Park JK, Shao M, Kim MY, Baik SK, Cho MY, Utsumi T, Satoh A, Ouyang X, Chung C and Iwakiri Y (2017) An endoplasmic reticulum protein, Nogo‐B, facilitates alcoholic liver disease through regulation of kupffer cell polarization. Hepatology 65, 1720–1734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pula B, Olbromski M, Owczarek T, Ambicka A, Witkiewicz W, Ugorski M, Rys J, Zabel M, Dziegiel P and Podhorska‐Okolow M (2014a) Nogo‐B receptor expression correlates negatively with malignancy grade and Ki‐67 antigen expression in invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Anticancer Res 34, 4819–4828. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pula B, Werynska B, Olbromski M, Muszczynska‐Bernhard B, Chabowski M, Janczak D, Zabel M, Podhorska‐Okolow M and Dziegiel P (2014b) Expression of Nogo isoforms and Nogo‐B receptor (NgBR) in non‐small cell lung carcinomas. Anticancer Res 34, 4059–4068. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rana U, Liu Z, Kumar SN, Zhao BF, Hu WQ, Bordas M, Cossette S, Szabo S, Foeckler J, Weiler H et al (2016) Nogo‐B receptor deficiency causes cerebral vasculature defects during embryonic development in mice. Dev Biol 410, 190–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rigamonti N, Kadioglu E, Keklikoglou I, Wyser Rmili C, Leow CC and De Palma M (2014) Role of angiopoietin‐2 in adaptive tumor resistance to VEGF signaling blockade. Cell Rep 8, 696–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith DC, Eisenberg PD, Manikhas G, Chugh R, Gubens MA, Stagg RJ, Kapoun AM, Xu L, Dupont J and Sikic B (2014) A phase I dose escalation and expansion study of the anticancer stem cell agent demcizumab (anti‐DLL4) in patients with previously treated solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 20, 6295–6303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tashiro K, Satoh A, Utsumi T, Chung C and Iwakiri Y (2013) Absence of Nogo‐B (reticulon 4B) facilitates hepatic stellate cell apoptosis and diminishes hepatic fibrosis in mice. Am J Pathol 182, 786–795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Walchli T, Pernet V, Weinmann O, Shiu JY, Guzik‐Kornacka A, Decrey G, Yuksel D, Schneider H, Vogel J, Ingber DE et al (2013) Nogo‐A is a negative regulator of CNS angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, E1943–E1952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang B, Zhao BF, North P, Kong A, Huang J and Miao QR (2013) Expression of NgBR is highly associated with estrogen receptor alpha and survivin in breast cancer. PLoS One 8, e78083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Willett CG, Boucher Y, di Tomaso E, Duda DG, Munn LL, Tong RT, Chung DC, Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Kozin SV et al (2004) Direct evidence that the VEGF‐specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer. Nat Med 10, 145–147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang J, Yu L, Bi AD and Zhao SY (2000) Assignment of the human reticulon 4 gene (RTN4) to chromosome 2p14–>2p13 by radiation hybrid mapping. Cytogenet Cell Genet 88, 101–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yu J, Fernandez‐Hernando C, Suarez Y, Schleicher M, Hao Z, Wright PL, DiLorenzo A, Kyriakides TR and Sessa WC (2009) Reticulon 4B (Nogo‐B) is necessary for macrophage infiltration and tissue repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 17511–17516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang D, Utsumi T, Huang HC, Gao L, Sangwung P, Chung C, Shibao K, Okamoto K, Yamaguchi K, Groszmann RJ et al (2011) Reticulon 4B (Nogo‐B) is a novel regulator of hepatic fibrosis. Hepatology 53, 1306–1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhao B, Chun C, Liu Z, Horswill MA, Pramanik K, Wilkinson GA, Ramchandran R and Miao RQ (2010) Nogo‐B receptor is essential for angiogenesis in zebrafish via Akt pathway. Blood 116, 5423–5433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhu B, Chen S, Hu X, Jin X, Le Y, Cao L, Yuan Z, Lin Z, Jiang S, Sun L et al (2017) Knockout of the Nogo‐B gene attenuates tumor growth and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Neoplasia 19, 583–593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1. Photographs of two TMAs.

Fig. S2. Establishment of CHO clones stably expressing integrin αvβ3.

Fig. S3. Nogo‐B is remarkably upregulated in different cancers.

Fig. S4. Representative photographs of immunohistochemical Nogo‐B staining in normal liver tissue and HCC.

Click here for additional data file. (753.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Molecular Oncology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES