Abstract
Two isoforms of the erythrocyte histone H1.a were identified in two conservative flocks of Rhode Island Red chickens and six conservative flocks of ducks. The H1.a1 and H1.a2 isoforms formed three phenotypes (a1, a2 and a1a2) and were electrophoretically similar in the two species. The frequency of phenotype and histone H1.a allele occurrence varied within the genetic groups of birds, but the relatively rare allele a 2 was only detected in chicken and duck strains with colored feathers. Using mass spectrometry, we established that the difference between the measured masses of the duck H1.a isoforms was 156 Da. Since this value corresponds to the mass of the arginine residue alone or to the combined mass of the valine and glycine residues, we believe that the polymorphism of duck histone H1.a might have originated from sequence variation. A mass difference of 1 Da observed between chicken H1.a isoforms corresponded well to the previously detected Glu/Lys substitution (0.9414 Da) at position 117.
Keywords: Chicken, Duck, Electrophoresis, Histone H1.a, Polymorphism, Mass spectrometry
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).
Abbreviations used
- PMSF
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
- PVDF
polyvinylidene fluoride
- SDS
sodium dodecyl sulfate
References
- 1.Happel N, Doenecke D. Histone H1 and its isoforms: contribution to chromatin structure and function. Gene. 2009;431:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fan Y, Nikitina T, Zhao J, Fleury TJ, Bhattacharyya R, Bouhassira EE, Stein A, Woodcock CL, Skoultchi AI. Histone H1 depletion in mammals alter global chromatin structure but causes specific changes in gene regulation. Cell. 2005;123:1199–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Terme J-M, Sese B, Millan-Arino L, Mayor R, Izpisua Belmonte JC, Barrero MJ, Jordan A. Histone H1 variants are differently expressed and incorporated into chromatin during differentiation and reprogramming to pluripotency. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:35347–35357. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.281923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Parseghian MH, Hamkalo BA. A compendium of the histone H1 family of somatic subtypes: An elusive cast of characters and their characteristics. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2001;79:289–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Izzo A, Kamieniarz K, Schneider R. The histone H1 family: specific members, specific functions? Biol. Chem. 2008;389:333–343. doi: 10.1515/BC.2008.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McBryant SJ, Lu X, Hansen JC. Multifunctionality of the linker histones: an emerging role for protein-protein interactions. Cell. Res. 2010;20:519–528. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jerzmanowski A. The linker histones. In: Zlatanova J, Leuba S, editors. Chromatin structure & dynamics: State-of-the-Art. 2004. pp. 75–102. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kowalski A, Pałyga J, Górnicka-Michalska E, Krajewska WM. Allelic polymorphism of histone H1.a in duck erythrocytes. Biochem. Genet. 1998;36:183–191. doi: 10.1023/a:1018768623444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Górnicka-Michalska E, Pałyga J, Kowalski A, Cywa-Benko K. Sequence variants of chicken linker histone H1.a. FEBS J. 2006;273:1240–1250. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Coles LS, Robins AJ, Madley LK, Wells RS. Characterization of the chicken histone H1 gene complement. Generation of a complete set of vertebrate H1 protein sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 1987;262:9656–9663. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pałyga J, Górnicka-Michalska E, Kowalski A. Genetic polymorphism of histone H1.z in duck erythrocytes. Biochem J. 1993;294:859–863. doi: 10.1042/bj2940859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kowalski A, Pałyga J. High-resolution two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: a tool for identification of polymorphic and modified linker histone components. In: Magdeldin S, editor. Gel electrophoresis — Principles and Basics, In Tech. 2012. pp. 117–136. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mizzen CA, Alpert AJ, Levesque L, Kruck TPA, McLachlan DR. Resolution of allelic and non-allelic variants of histone H1 by cationexchange-hydrophilic-interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. B. 2000;744:33–46. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)00210-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sarg B, Green A, Soderkvist B, Helliger W, Runquist I, Lindner H. Characterization of sequence variations in human histone H1.2 and H1.4 subtypes. FEBS J. 2005;272:3673–3683. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04793.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ortiz ML, Calero M, Fernandez Patron C, Patron CF, Castellanos L, Mendez L. Imidazole-SDS-Zn reverse staining of proteins in gels containing or not SDS and microsequence of individual unmodified electroblotted proteins. FEBS Lett. 1992;296:300–304. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80309-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cohen SL, Chait BT. Mass spectrometry of whole proteins eluted from sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels. Anal. Biochem. 1997;247:257–267. doi: 10.1006/abio.1997.2072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Villar-Garea A, Imhof A. PLoS One. 2008. Fine mapping of posttranslational modifications of the linker histone H1 from Drosophila melanogaster; p. e1553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Berdnikov VA, Bogdanova VS, Gorel FL, Kosterin OE, Trusov YA. Large changes in the structure of the major histone H1 subtype result in small effects on quantitative traits in legumes. Genetica. 2003;119:67–182. doi: 10.1023/a:1026058605485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Kruger S, Mann M. Mass spectrometric mapping of linker histone H1 variants reveals multiple acetylations, methylations, and phosphorylation as well as differences between cell culture and tissue. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2007;6:72–87. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M600255-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Routh A, Sandin S, Rhodes D. Nucleosome repeat length and linker histone stoichiometry determine chromatin fiber structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:8872–8877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802336105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zlatanova J, Caiafa P, van Holde K. Linker histone binding and displacement: versatile mechanism for transcriptional regulation. FASEB J. 2000;14:1697–1704. doi: 10.1096/fj.99-0869rev. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Trollope A, Sapojnikova N, Thorne AW, Crane-Robinson C, Myers FA. Linker histone subtypes are not generalized gene repressors. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 2010;1799:642–652. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Caterino TL, Fang H, Hayes JJ. Nucleosome linker DNA contacts and induces specific folding of the intrinsically disordered H1 carboxyl-terminal domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011;31:2341–2348. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05145-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hansen JC, Lu X, Ross ED, Woody RW. Intrinsic protein disorder, amino acid composition, and histone terminal domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:1853–18656. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R500022200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lu X, Hamkalo B, Parseghian MH, Hansen JC. Chromatin condensing functions of the linker histone C-terminal domain are mediated by specific amino acid composition and intrinsic protein disorder. Biochemistry. 2009;48:164–172. doi: 10.1021/bi801636y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bogdanova VS, Lester DR, Berdnikov VA, Andersson I. Structure of allelic variants of subtype 5 of histone H1 in a pea Pisum sativum L. Heredity. 2005;94:582–588. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bogdanova VS, Kosterin OE, Berdnikov VA. Phenotypic effect of substitution of allelic variants for a histone H1 subtype specific for growing tissues in the garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genetica. 2007;130:61–72. doi: 10.1007/s10709-006-0021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pałyga J, Górnicka-Michalska E, Kowalski A, Książkiewicz J. Natural allelic variation of duck erythrocyte histone H1.b. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2000;32:665–675. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(99)00153-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
