Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
. 2017 Dec 28;103(3):1077–1087. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02257

Peripheral Endocannabinoids Associated With Energy Expenditure in Native Americans of Southwestern Heritage

Sascha Heinitz 1,, Alessio Basolo 1, Paolo Piaggi 1, Daniele Piomelli 2, Reiner Jumpertz von Schwartzenberg 3,4,5, Jonathan Krakoff 1
PMCID: PMC6276675  PMID: 29300902

Abstract

Context

The endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), as well as the related acylethanolamide oleoylethanolamide (OEA), have been implicated in energy expenditure (EE) regulation and metabolic diseases. Muscle (fat-free mass) and fat (fat mass) are metabolically active compartments and main determinants of EE.

Objective

To assess whether human muscle, adipose, and plasma endocannabinoids correlate with EE.

Design

Muscle, adipose, and plasma AEA, 2-AG, and OEA concentrations were measured via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. EE was assessed by indirect whole-room calorimetry.

Setting

Clinical trial.

Participants

Obese/overweight Native Americans of full (n = 35) and at least half (n = 21) Southwestern heritage.

Main Outcome Measures

Twenty-four-hour EE, sleeping EE (SLEEP), resting EE (REE), respiratory quotient (RQ), and macronutrient oxidation.

Results

In full Natives, muscle AEA concentration correlated with SLEEP (r = −0.65, P = 0.004) and REE (r = −0.53, P = 0.02). Muscle 2-AG was associated with SLEEP (r = −0.75, P = 0.0003). Adipose OEA concentration correlated with RQ (r = −0.47, P = 0.04) and lipid oxidation (r = 0.51, P = 0.03). Plasma OEA concentration was associated with SLEEP (r = −0.52, P = 0.04). After adjustment for major determinants, these lipids explained nearly 20% of the additional variance of the respective measure. Similarly, in Native Americans of at least half Southwestern heritage, investigated lipids correlated with EE measures.

Conclusion

Endocannabinoids in metabolically relevant peripheral tissues explained a large part of EE variation and may be involved in regulating EE. Dysregulation of peripheral endocannabinoids may predispose people to metabolic diseases via an effect on EE and lipid oxidation.


In association analyses of endocannabinoid concentration in peripheral tissues with energy expenditure (EE) measures, muscle and adipose endocannabinoids correlate with EE and macronutrient oxidation.


Endocannabinoids, their regulatory enzymes, and targeted receptors make up the endocannabinoid system (ECS) (1). As derivatives of polyunsaturated fatty acids, endocannabinoids such as anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) are synthesized on demand from cell membrane phospholipids in various tissues (2–4) and bind to their G protein–coupled metabotropic receptors CB1 and CB2 via autocrine and paracrine signaling (3, 4). The nonendocannabinoid acylethanolamide oleoylethanolamide (OEA) is considered an ECS-related congener, synthesized and degraded together with AEA (5).

The ECS is involved in multiple metabolic pathways and has been extensively studied as a central regulator of energy balance (2). The ECS was shown to promote energy intake via central mechanisms, and consistent with a proposed effect on energy expenditure (EE), CB1-receptor antagonism/inverse agonism increased EE in rodents and humans (2, 6, 7). The latter was attributed to a relatively higher rate of lipid oxidation upon treatment (6, 7). In addition to an effect on lipid metabolism, in vitro and rodent models suggest that endocannabinoids are implied in glucose metabolism, as well as mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue (1, 8–10), thus putatively affecting body compartments representative of the major determinants of human EE [i.e., fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM)] (11). Whether in humans and under physiologic conditions the role of the ECS in regulating metabolic activity in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue may be translated to an effect on EE is to be determined.

In plasma, changes in AEA and 2-AG concentrations are reflective of a dysregulated ECS tone in obesity and related disorders (1). It is, however, unclear whether plasma endocannabinoid concentrations are representative of ECS activity across tissues and thus correlate with a potential role of this system in EE regulation. Notably, cerebrospinal concentration of endocannabinoid-related OEA was shown to correlate with human EE measures, implicating this lipid in EE regulation via peripheral messaging (12). Despite its close structural and common origins with endocannabinoids, OEA reduces food intake and body weight via different receptors (13, 14) and possibly by enhanced peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α–mediated lipolysis (15).

Given the implication of endocannabinoids and related OEA in metabolic processes and new research focusing on solely peripherally acting endocannabinoid antagonism (16), we characterized plasma, skeletal muscle and adipose tissue concentrations of AEA, 2-AG, and OEA and their associations with different measures of EE, assessed by indirect calorimetry in Native Americans of Southwestern heritage.

Materials and Methods

Participants and clinical assessment

The present report included data from 35 Native Americans of at least half Southwestern heritage and 21 Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage who participated (February 1995 to March 2009) in an ongoing study to identify obesity risk factors (17). Upon providing informed consent, healthy, nonpregnant, and nonlactating study participants were admitted to our clinical research unit. All volunteers included into the study were without diabetes [as per 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA) or Autoanalyzer (Technicon, Tarrytown, NY)] (18). After admission, a sex- and weight-adjusted weight-maintaining diet was administered, consisting of 50% carbohydrates, 30% lipids, and 20% proteins (food quotient = 0.87). During the measurement of 24-hour EE, the weight-maintaining diet was adjusted to account for the reduced physical activity while in the metabolic chamber (19, 20). To ensure weight stability (±1%), caloric content of this diet was modified, if necessary. Anthropometric measurements of FM, FFM, and percentage body fat were performed using X-ray absorptiometry (DPX-1; Lunar Radiation Corp., Madison, WI) (21). Metabolic measurements were performed (see “Metabolic assessment”), and during the same stay, biological samples were collected: subcutaneous adipose tissue for measurement of endocannabinoids and OEA was removed from McBurney’s point or the respective area on the individual’s opposite site. A percutaneous needle biopsy of the vastus lateralis muscle was performed, as previously described (17). Prior to the oral glucose tolerance test, fasting plasma was collected for peripheral lipid measurement. Skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and fasting plasma were snap-frozen and stored at −80°C until analysis.

The study (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00340132) was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Measurement of AEA, 2-AG, and OEA in human samples

In a single set on analysis, assessment of endocannabinoid and OEA concentrations in skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and fasting plasma samples was performed in D. Piomelli’s laboratory at the Department of Pharmacology, University of California, Irvine, using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, as previously described (22). For a detailed description, please refer to the supplement.

Metabolic assessment

Twenty-four-hour EE was assessed using a whole-room indirect calorimeter, as previously described (11). Between 8:00 am and 7:45 am of the following day (23.75 hours), respiratory flow was continuously measured, providing the basis for EE assessment:

EE=VO2×[4.686+(RQ0.707)×0.361/0.293]11,

where VO2 is oxygen consumed, 4.686 is the caloric equivalent of oxygen (O2) per liter when the respiratory quotient (RQ; RQ = VCO2/VO2, where VCO2 is carbon dioxide produced) equals 0.707 (i.e., when lipids are oxidized), 0.293 is the difference between the RQ for carbohydrate and lipid oxidation, and 0.361 is the difference for the caloric equivalent of O2 per liter between an RQ = 1.000 and an RQ = 0.707.

During 15-minute sampling intervals, the mean carbon dioxide and O2 gas exchange was calculated. During 23.75 hours in the whole-room calorimeter, 95 fifteen-minute sampling intervals were used to assess an individual’s EE as described in the above equation. To estimate 24-hour EE [coefficient of variation (CV), 2.4%], the measured EE during 23.75 hours was extrapolated to 24 hours (11). The average EE of all 15-minute intervals between 11:30 pm and 5 am of the following day for which spontaneous physical activity (SPA) was <1.5% served as an estimate for an individual’s sleeping EE (SLEEP; CV, 3.7%) (11, 23). SPA was assessed by radar (11). Compared with sleep, the increase of a participant’s thermogenesis in the awake, nonactive, and fed state is reflected by the awake-and-fed thermogenesis (AFT) (24). AFT is calculated from the difference between EE in the inactive state (EESPA) and SLEEP. It is these three components that make up 24-hour EE (24). Therefore, in case of correlation between 24-hour EE and lipid species, AFT and EESPA were investigated for association to assess the effect of endocannabinoids and OEA on this measure’s different components. Measurement of 24-hour carbon dioxide production and oxygen consumption (L) during an individual’s stay in the metabolic chamber allowed for calculation of the 24-hour RQ as a ratio of these two measures, after extrapolating each 15-minute measurement to 24 hours. From the 24-hour RQ, 24-hour lipid and carbohydrate oxidation were determined after accounting for protein oxidation as assessed by measuring 24-hour nitrogen excretion in urine. On a separate day and after an overnight fast, the energy expended in the motionless and awake state [resting energy expenditure (REE)] was also measured by a ventilated hood system (11). For REE, average interval measures (40 minutes) were extrapolated to 24 hours (CV, 4.7%) (11).

Statistical analyses

SAS Enterprise Guide 7.1 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) was used to perform correlation analyses of endocannabinoid and OEA concentrations with EE measures. Measured concentrations for adipose and skeletal muscle lipids were log10-transformed to reduce the influence of extreme values on association analyses. Baseline characteristics are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Residuals of EE measures were obtained after introducing the major known determinants of the respective measurement into general linear models. For 24-hour EE, SLEEP, EESPA, and REE, these included age, sex, FFM, and FM (24, 25). Twenty-four-hour EE was also adjusted for SPA (11). Twenty-four-hour RQ was adjusted for age, sex, energy balance during indirect calorimetry, and percentage body fat (26). Major determinants of 24-hour substrate oxidation were age, sex, energy balance, FM, and FFM (11, 25). AFT was adjusted for age, sex, FFM, percentage body fat, and fasting glucose concentrations (24). Measures of anthropometry were adjusted for age and sex. The α level was set to 0.05. Pearson correlations are reported for normally distributed or log10-transformed variables. Native Americans of full vs at least half Southwestern heritage were analyzed separately in the current study to compare populations of similar anthropometry but of a more homogeneous (full Native) vs a more mixed heritage (at least half Native). For sensitivity analyses comparing study groups (i.e., full vs at least half Native Americans, participants with incomplete EE or lipid assessment), please refer to the supplement. By definition, Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage are included in the study group of at least half Native Americans. Both study groups were analyzed separately.

Results

Correlation of AEA, 2-AG, and OEA with participant characteristics and across tissues

For population characteristics, please refer to Table 1. Tissue and plasma lipid concentrations are reported in Supplemental Table 1. Partial correlations of anthropometry with tissue and plasma AEA, 2-AG, and OEA concentrations are reported in Supplemental Table 2. In Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage, adipose AEA concentration was associated with body mass index (r = 0.56, P = 0.04). Adipose OEA concentration correlated with percentage body fat (r = 0.59, P = 0.03). For plasma and skeletal muscle, there were no associations (all P > 0.05). In Native Americans of at least half Southwestern heritage, across tissues, no associations for AEA, 2-AG, and OEA concentration with participant characteristics were found (all P > 0.05).

Table 1.

Study Population: Demographic Characteristics

Characteristic Study Participants
Native Americans of Full Southwestern Heritage Native Americans of at Least Half Southwestern Heritage
All Participantsa,b (n = 21) Male (n = 13) Female (n = 8) All Participantsa,b (n = 35) Male (n = 22) Female (n = 13)
Age, y 30.0 ± 7.82 30.3 ± 8.13 31.1 ± 7.70 28.9 ± 7.5 28.9 ± 7.6 29.0 ± 7.5
Body weight, kg 94.6 ± 18.5 94.4 ± 16.8 95.1 ± 22.3 91.9 ± 18.0 93.6 ± 16.8 89.0 ± 20.3
Body mass index, kg/m2 34.7 ± 8.56 32.9 ± 9.22 37.7 ± 6.90 32.9 ± 7.7 31.8 ± 7.7 34.8 ± 7.6
Body fat, % 33.5 ± 8.45 28.1 ± 5.72 42.2 ± 2.71 32.6 ± 7.7 28.0 ± 5.4 40.4 ± 3.7
Waist circumference, in. 43.4 ± 5.77 41.8 ± 5.09 46.0 ± 6.16 42.2 ± 5.5 41.4 ± 5.0 43.4 ± 6.3
FM, kg 32.1 ± 11.4 27.2 ± 9.36 40.1 ± 10.1 30.3 ± 10.3 26.9 ± 9.0 36.2 ± 10.0
FFM, kg 62.5 ± 11.8 67.2 ± 8.48 54.9 ± 12.9 61.5 ± 11.7 66.7 ± 8.7 52.8 ± 11.0
Fasting plasma glucose, mg/dL 87.3 ± 7.62 85.4 ± 7.88 90.4 ± 6.48 86.0 ± 9.0 83.6 ± 9.8 90.0 ± 6.0
2-h plasma glucose, mg/dL 125.0 ± 22.7 120.1 ± 21.4 133.0 ± 23.9 118.0 ± 24.0 114.1 ± 22.6 124.6 ± 25.9
Glucose tolerance statusc
 Normal glucose regulation 15 (71.4) 11 (84.6) 4 (50.0) 28 (80.0) 20 (90.9) 8 (53.3)
 Impaired glucose regulation 6 (28.6) 2 (15.4) 4 (50.0) 7 (20.0) 2 (9.09) 5 (46.7)
Energy intake, kcal/dd 2344 ± 313 2423 ± 282 2217 ± 340 2282 ± 316.6 2383 ± 280 2113 ± 312.4
24-h respiratory quotient 0.86 ± 0.03 0.86 ± 0.02 0.85 ± 0.03 0.86 ± 0.04 0.87 ± 0.03 0.84 ± 0.05
24-h carbohydrate oxidation, kcal/d 1164 ± 253 1266 ± 172 976 ± 283 1121 ± 350 1276 ± 210 863 ± 391
24-h lipid oxidation, kcal/d 859 ± 296 904 ± 284 777 ± 324 855 ± 342 835 ± 276 889 ± 442
24-h energy expenditure, kcal/d 2389 ± 370 2560 ± 277 2112 ± 342 2345 ± 318 2474 ± 263 2127 ± 289
Sleeping energy expenditure, kcal/d 1790 ± 276 1883 ± 236 1646 ± 288 1750 ± 290 1834 ± 276 1605 ± 263
Resting energy expenditure, kcal/d 1790 ± 276 1891 ± 92 1627 ± 203 1812 ± 212 1896 ± 184 1655 ± 173

All data reported as frequency (percentage) or mean ± standard deviation. Native Americans of full and at least half Southwestern heritage were included in present analyses: in these individuals, Southwestern Native American heritage was of 8/8th vs ≥4/8th tribal descent by self-report, respectively.

a

Only healthy, nondiabetic (2-hour plasma glucose <200 mg/dL) individuals between 18 and 55 years old were included.

b

Maximum population size reported. Due to data availability, sample size may differ for certain measurements (see Supplemental Data).

c

For normal glucose regulation, fasting plasma glucose <100 mg/dL and 2-hour plasma glucose <140 mg/dL, and for impaired glucose regulation, fasting plasma glucose 100 to 126 mg/dL and/or 2-hour plasma glucose 140 to 199 mg/dL, in accordance with the American Diabetes Association guidelines (18).

d

Total energy intake during a 24-hour stay in a respiratory chamber. Meals served at 8 am, 11 am, 4 pm, and 7 pm. No difference in energy intake comparing Native Americans of full vs at least half Southwestern heritage (61.7 kcal/d, SE 87.1, P = 0.48).

Associations for endocannabinoid and OEA content across tissues and plasma are shown in Table 2. In Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage, muscle AEA concentration was associated with plasma OEA concentration (r = 0.54, P = 0.003). In Native Americans of at least half Southwestern heritage, muscle AEA and 2-AG concentrations correlated with plasma OEA concentration (r = 0.60, P = 0.0006 and r = 0.42, P = 0.02, respectively). Adipose AEA concentration was associated with plasma OEA concentration (r = 0.45, P = 0.03).

Table 2.

Correlation of Endocannabinoids and Oleoylethanolamide Across Tissues

Charcteristic Skeletal Muscle Tissue Adipose Tissue Plasma
AEA 2-AG OEA AEA 2-AG OEA AEA 2-AG OEA
Skeletal muscle tissue
 AEA
  r −0.11 −0.13 0.33 0.31 0.29 0.60
  P 0.57 0.51 0.09 0.10 0.13 0.0006
 2-AG
  r −0.06 −0.02 −0.16 0.34 0.08 0.42
  P 0.74 0.93 0.42 0.07 0.66 0.02
 OEA
  r 0.13 0.19 0.12 0.20 0.02 0.27
  P 0.51 0.32 0.55 0.30 0.90 0.16
Adipose tissue
 AEA
  r −0.11 −0.06 0.13 0.24 0.38 0.45
  P 0.57 0.74 0.51 0.26 0.07 0.03
 2-AG
  r −0.13 −0.02 0.19 0.21 0.03 0.30
  P 0.51 0.93 0.32 0.32 0.87 0.16
 OEA
  r 0.33 −0.16 0.12 −0.13 0.11 0.28
  P 0.09 0.42 0.55 0.55 0.61 0.19
Plasma
 AEA
  r 0.31 0.34 0.20 0.24 0.21 −0.13
  P 0.10 0.07 0.30 0.26 0.32 0.55
 2-AG
  r 0.29 0.08 0.02 0.38 0.03 0.11
  P 0.13 0.66 0.90 0.07 0.87 0.61
 OEA
  r 0.60 0.42 0.27 0.45 0.30 0.28
  P 0.0006 0.02 0.16 0.03 0.16 0.19

Partial correlation of AEA, 2-AG, and OEA across skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, as well as plasma in Native Americans of at least half Southwestern heritage (n = 35), adjusted for age and sex. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) reported. Significant results are highlighted in bold. In Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage, the association between skeletal muscle AEA concentration and plasma OEA concentration (in italics) could be reproduced. AEA, 2-AG, and OEA concentrations were log10-transformed to reduce the influence of extreme values on the multivariate model.

Skeletal muscle tissue endocannabinoid and OEA concentrations and EE in Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage

The 2-AG concentration in skeletal muscle correlated with residual 24-hour EE [r = −0.51, P = 0.03, β = −333.4 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, standard error (SE) 107.9; Fig. 1(a)], as well as residual SLEEP [r = −0.75, P = 0.0003, β = −537.4 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, SE 107.0; Fig. 1(b)]. After accounting for major known determinants of 24-hour EE and SLEEP, 2-AG accounted for an additional 4% and 20% [Fig. 2(a)] of the variance in 24-hour EE and SLEEP, respectively. Muscle 2-AG concentration was not associated with residual AFT but showed a negative correlation with residual EESPA (r = −0.68, P = 0.003, β = −0.49 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, SE 0.14). Muscle AEA concentration was also associated with residual SLEEP [r = −0.65, P = 0.004, β = −443.0.6 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, SE 125.3; Fig. 1(c)] and residual REE [r = −0.53, P = 0.02, β = −310.2 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, SE 95.8; Fig. 1(d)]. AEA explained an additional 15% [Fig. 2(b)] and 7% of these measures’ variance, respectively. In a multivariate model, muscle 2-AG and AEA jointly explained 26% of the unknown variance of SLEEP after accounting for age, sex, FM, and FFM with β = −416.6 kcal/d per 10-fold difference for 2-AG (P = 0.0004, SE 83.4) and β = −281.9 kcal/d per 10-fold difference for AEA (P = 0.005, SE 79.2). Muscle OEA concentrations were not associated with residual 24-hour EE, SLEEP, or REE (all P > 0.05). There were no correlations between any of the lipid species with residual 24-hour RQ and substrate oxidation (all P > 0.05).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Adjusted correlations of residual measures of EE with skeletal muscle AEA and 2-AG. Association analysis of 2-AG with residuals of (a) 24-hour EE and (b) SLEEP, as well as AEA with residuals of (c) SLEEP and (d) REE in Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage. Twenty-four-hour EE, SLEEP, and REE were adjusted for age, sex, FM, and FFM. Twenty-four-hour EE was also adjusted for spontaneous physical activity (25). Endocannabinoids and OEA concentrations were log10-transformed to reduce the influence of extreme values on the multivariate model. Sensitivity analyses were performed for (a) dFβ = −3.69 standard deviation (SD), r = −0.13, P = 0.62; (b) dFβ = 1.96 SD, r = −0.67, P = 0.003; and (c) dFβ = 2.46 SD, r = −0.58, P = 0.01. Pearson correlation (r) reported. Due to incomplete EE and/or lipid assessment in skeletal muscle, the number of individuals included here in the presented analyses differed from the overall group of 21 Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage. Compared with the latter, these participants were not different regarding age, sex, FM, FFM, body mass index, percentage body fat, glucose regulation, and AEA, 2-AG, and OEA tissue and plasma concentrations (all P > 0.05). Individuals with EE measured using a whole-room indirect calorimeter (n = 18) and those with REE measured using the ventilated hood method (n = 18) were two different subgroups from the 21 individuals with lipid concentrations assessed in skeletal muscle. In sensitivity analyses considering age, sex, FM, FFM, body mass index, percentage body fat, glucose regulation, and AEA, 2-AG, and OEA tissue and plasma concentrations, both groups were not different from each other or the overall study population of at least half and full Native Americans of Southwestern heritage (all P > 0.05).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Variance of EE measure explained by AEA, 2-AG, and OEA. Variance of (a, b) SLEEP and (c) 24-hour RQ explained by major known determinants (SLEEP: FFM, FM, age, and sex; for 24-hour RQ: percentage body fat, energy balance during indirect calorimetry, age, and sex) and skeletal muscle (a) 2-AG or (b) AEA concentrations, as well as adipose tissue (c) OEA concentration, respectively. Notably, due to our study group size, reported variance may differ from previous reports (27).

Adipose tissue endocannabinoid and OEA concentrations in Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage

Adipose OEA concentrations were correlated with residual 24-hour RQ [r = −0.47, P = 0.04, β = −0.11 per 10-fold difference, SE 0.04; Fig. 3(a)], residual 24-hour lipid, and carbohydrate oxidation [r = 0.51, P = 0.03 and β = 734.2 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, SE 309.0; r = −0.57, P = 0.01 and β = −931.7 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, SE 322.4, respectively; Fig. 3(b) and 3(c)]. After accounting for the major known determinants of 24-hour RQ, 24-hour lipid oxidation, and carbohydrate oxidation, OEA explained an additional 21% [Fig. 2(c)], 10%, and 22% of these measurements, respectively. For other EE measures, including analyses performed for the AEA and 2-AG content in adipose tissue, no associations were found (all P > 0.05).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Adjusted correlations of residuals of RQ and substrate oxidation with adipose OEA. Association analysis of OEA with residuals of (a) 24-hour RQ, (b) 24-hour lipid oxidation, and (c) 24-hour carbohydrate oxidation in Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage. Twenty-four-hour RQ was adjusted for age, sex, energy balance, and percentage body fat. Twenty-four-hour lipid and carbohydrate oxidation were adjusted for age, sex, energy balance, FM, and FFM (25). OEA concentration was log10-transformed to reduce the influence of extreme values on the multivariate model. Pearson correlation (r) reported. Due to incomplete EE and/or lipid assessment in adipose tissue, the number of individuals included here in the presented analyses differed from the overall group of 21 Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage. Compared with the latter, these participants were not different regarding age, sex, FM, FFM, body mass index, percentage body fat, glucose regulation, and AEA, 2-AG, and OEA tissue and plasma concentrations (all P > 0.05).

Plasma endocannabinoid and OEA concentrations in Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage

In plasma, OEA was associated with residual SLEEP (r = −0.52, P = 0.04; β = −619.7 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, SE 287.6) in 15 individuals with complete EE and lipid assessment. The inclusion of OEA into a general linear model for SLEEP explained an additional 12% of this measure’s variance. Further analyses did not show any correlations for OEA, AEA, and 2-AG with residual EE measures, 24-hour RQ, and substrate oxidation (all P > 0.05).

Comparison of associations in Native Americans of at least half Southwestern heritage

In comparison with the full Native American group, in 30 Native Americans of at least half Southwestern heritage with complete EE data as well as skeletal muscle lipid assessment, the muscle 2-AG and AEA concentration correlated with residual SLEEP as well [r = −0.48, P = 0.007, β = −414.7 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, SE 139.9, Fig. 4(a); r = −0.62, P = 0.0003, β = −441.5 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, SE 100.7, Fig. 4(b), respectively]. In line with our findings in Native Americans of full Southwestern heritage, in individuals of at least half Southwestern heritage, OEA adipose tissue concentration correlated with residual 24-hour RQ [r = −0.36, P = 0.05, β = −0.06 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, SE 0.03, Fig. 4(c)] and trended to an association with residual 24-hour lipid and carbohydrate oxidation [r = 0.33, P = 0.08, β = 434.1 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, SE 227.8, and r = −0.31, P = 0.09, β = −475.9 kcal/d per 10-fold difference, SE −475.9; Fig. 4(d) and 4(e), respectively].

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Adjusted correlations in Native Americans of at least half Southwestern heritage. Association analysis of 2-AG and AEA with residuals of (a, b) SLEEP, as well as OEA with residuals of (c) 24-hour RQ, (d) 24-hour lipid oxidation, and (e) carbohydrate oxidation in Native Americans of at least half Southwestern heritage. SLEEP was adjusted for age, sex, FM, and FFM. Twenty-four-hour RQ was adjusted for age, sex, energy balance, and body fat. Twenty-four-hour lipid and carbohydrate oxidation were adjusted for age, sex, energy balance, FM, and FFM (25). Endocannabinoids and OEA concentrations were log10-transformed to reduce the influence of extreme values on the multivariate model. Sensitivity analyses for significant results were performed: in (a), removing the individual with the highest residual SLEEP from analysis did not change the significance of reported results (dFβ = −2.05, r = −0.38, P = 0.04). The same sensitivity analyses were performed for (b): upon removal of the individual with the lowest AEA concentration, the association of skeletal muscle AEA concentration with residual SLEEP was still significant (dFβ = −3.71, r = −0.46, P = 0.01). This was also true for the other outlier with a slightly higher AEA concentration (dFβ = 1.59, r = −0.63, P = 0.0003). Excluding both outliers from association analysis did not affect the significance of presented results (r = −0.43, P = 0.02). Pearson correlation (r) reported. Due to incomplete EE and/or lipid assessment in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, the number of individuals included here in the presented analyses differed from the overall group of 35 Native Americans of at least half Southwestern heritage. Compared with the latter, these participants were not different regarding age, sex, FM, FFM, body mass index, percentage body fat, glucose regulation, and AEA, 2-AG, and OEA tissue and plasma concentrations (all P > 0.05).

Discussion

We have demonstrated that skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and plasma concentrations of endocannabinoids and endocannabinoid-related OEA—lipid compounds already implicated in energy balance regulation (1, 2)—are associated with measures of EE and substrate oxidation in humans at risk for metabolic and cardiovascular disease. Specifically, skeletal muscle AEA and 2-AG content were correlated with SLEEP, REE, and 24-hour EE in this population, explaining a large amount of the residual variance after accounting for the known determinants of these measures (11, 25). Specifically, for SLEEP, AEA and 2-AG explained an additional 15% and 20% and, jointly, 26% of its variance. In adipose tissue, OEA was associated with 24-hour RQ, 24-hour lipid oxidation, and carbohydrate oxidation, accounting for 21% of the variance for 24-hour RQ. Peripheral OEA concentrations in plasma were associated with SLEEP, as well. Primarily in skeletal muscle and plasma, associations were found between AEA, 2-AG, and OEA. Our analyses indicate that in Native Americans of Southwestern heritage, peripheral AEA, 2-AG, and OEA may be involved in the regulation of EE.

The ECS affects weight gain via central and peripheral mechanisms of energy intake and EE control: in rodents and humans, higher central ECS activity leads to greater food intake and activates food reward–related mechanisms (1, 2). Central reduction of ECS tone, either by deletion of hypothalamic CB1-receptor or increased endocannabinoid degradation, led to higher EE in mice and affected weight change (28, 29). Evidence from cell cultures suggests that higher ECS activity decreases insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and oxidative metabolism in human skeletal muscle (8, 9, 30), whereas lower ECS tone led to greater mitogenesis (9). In adipose tissue, higher ECS activity increases adipose lipid storage and mitochondrial biogenesis (6, 10, 31). Thus, the ECS may affect metabolic activity of overall representatives of FFM and FM, which indicates a role for peripheral ECS activity in human EE regulation (1, 2). To date, studies have investigated a link between the ECS and human EE primarily in vitro or in a clinical trial administering a CB1-receptor inverse agonist (6–10, 29, 31). The current study demonstrated associations between directly measured tissue concentrations of the ECS and related OEA with gold-standard measures of EE under physiologic conditions, providing novel insight into the involvement of the ECS in human energy balance regulation.

We found that the concentration of specific endocannabinoids in skeletal muscle was negatively associated with EE. This is supported by rodent models in which CB1-receptor stimulation results in impaired skeletal muscle oxidative metabolism and mitogenesis, whereas CB1-receptor antagonism induces lipolysis and increased EE (6, 10, 31). In human skeletal muscle, inhibition of the CB1-receptor (1) reduces the expression of adenosine monophosphate–activated protein kinase α-1, a positive regulator of glucose and lipid oxidation, as well as mitogenesis (9), and (2) decreases pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 expression, which is involved in mitochondrial glucose oxidation (9). A clinical trial investigating the effect of administration of a CB1-receptor inverse agonist on EE found an increase in lipid oxidation along with increased REE (7). We did not observe an association of AEA and 2-AG with 24-hour RQ or lipid oxidation, indicating that basal ECS activity may have a more limited role in affecting EE via lipid metabolism. However, these studies imply a role for the ECS in skeletal muscle metabolic control. Furthermore, as supported by our multivariate model for 2-AG, AEA, and SLEEP, 2-AG and AEA may act as independent regulators of human EE. Specifically, regarding the different components of EE, AEA and 2-AG might primarily affect SLEEP.

FFM explains ∼70% of the variance in EE (27). Although ∼20% of this variance is determined by the energy expended by skeletal muscle (32), skeletal muscle has a relatively low mass-specific metabolic rate (33), and other components of FFM, such as the liver, kidneys, or brain, contribute to a greater extent to EE (34). Therefore, we need to be cautious in the interpretation of the dimension a skeletal muscle endocannabinoid effect might have on human EE. Nevertheless, AEA and 2-AG explained a large amount of the residual variance in SLEEP, adjusted for its major known determinants. As for obesity therapy, it remains a major challenge to identify novel determinants of EE; our data may point to the peripheral ECS as a putative aim of targeted pharmacotherapy. Notably, novel pathways have been described via which the ECS may modulate EE. These may include, for instance, a role of endocannabinoids in sphingolipid-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction (35).

Although in adipocyte cultures, a higher ECS tone affects metabolic processes such as lipolysis, fatty acid oxidation, and mitochondrial biogenesis (1, 10, 31), we did not observe an association between adipose tissue AEA and 2-AG concentration and EE measures. This is not surprising as higher 24-hour EE in participants with obesity is primarily due to greater metabolically active FFM and not FM (11). Nevertheless, adipose tissue OEA—an ECS congener—may be important in mechanisms underlying human weight regulation: we found that increased OEA adipose tissue concentrations were associated with lower 24-hour RQ, consistent with increased lipid oxidation. Dependent on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α activation, OEA induced adipocyte lipolysis in a rodent model and in vitro (36), as well as reduced energy intake upon peripheral administration in rats (13). It might therefore be that its antiobesogenic action is due to the effect of OEA on lipid oxidation and food intake (13, 36). Individuals with higher 24-hour RQs, indicating lower reliance on lipids, gain more weight than individuals who use lipids as a primary source for energy production (26, 37). This effect is thought to be mediated via greater food intake to replenish glycogen stores (37). As human adipocyte in vitro lipolysis is associated with whole-body lipid oxidation (38), the association of adipose OEA concentration with 24-hour RQ and substrate oxidation indirectly indicates a role for adipose OEA in human food intake regulation. Thus, pharmacotherapy directed at adipose OEA in humans may be useful to modify energy intake via an effect on lipid vs carbohydrate oxidation.

The negative association of plasma OEA concentration with SLEEP was observed in a small study subpopulation and could not be reproduced in our bigger study cohort. It is interesting to note that although we generally did not find associations of AEA, 2-AG, and OEA across body tissues, there was an association between skeletal muscle AEA and plasma OEA, and both were associated with SLEEP. These results thus may reflect an overall ECS tone influencing metabolism (1).

Although our sample size in the full Native study subgroup was limited, comparative analyses of ECS and/or OEA and EE measures for Native Americans of full vs at least half Southwestern heritage of similar anthropometry indicated that in these groups, variation in the degree of Southwestern heritage had little effect on investigated associations.

Our results are consistent with the known physiology of the ECS and its related lipid OEA. However, we acknowledge that the current study investigated a relatively small cohort of Native Americans of Southwestern heritage. Nevertheless, we were able to show that association patterns observed for full Native Americans were largely shown in a larger study population of a more mixed Southwestern heritage as well. Although it should be noted that results from other metabolic studies conducted in individuals of Native American Southwestern heritage have been confirmed in other populations (39), our data still need to be reproduced in larger cohorts of a more diverse heritage. Due to its sample size, results drawn from our study population may be influenced by outliers, and we acknowledge that this particularly affected the association of 24-hour EE and skeletal muscle 2-AG content. However, all other sensitivity analyses performed supported our results. Although the ECS and OEA have been implicated in energy regulation, our results are cross-sectional and thus cannot confirm causality. Unlike other studies, we did not find an association between plasma endocannabinoids and OEA and body composition or plasma glucose (12, 40), possibly due to our small cohort.

To conclude, we have demonstrated associations between muscle and adipose concentrations of AEA, 2-AG, and OEA with measures of EE and substrate oxidation in Native Americans of Southwestern heritage. Moreover, these concentrations are correlated across different body compartments. Thus, the peripheral endocannabinoid system and its related congener OEA remain intriguing targets for pharmacologic regulation of energy balance.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

Financial Support: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Fund, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and the Berlin Institute of Health Charité Clinician Scientist Program (to R.J.v.S.).

Clinical Trial Information: ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT00340132 (registered 1 August 1982).

Disclosure Summary: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Abbreviations:

2-AG

2-arachidonoylglycerol

AEA

anandamide

AFT

awake-and-fed thermogenesis

CV

coefficient of variation

ECS

endocannabinoid system

EE

energy expenditure

EESPA

energy expenditure in the inactive state

FFM

fat-free mass

FM

at mass

O2

oxygen

OEA

oleoylethanolamide

REE

resting energy expenditure

RQ

respiratory quotient

SE

standard error

SLEEP

sleeping energy expenditure

SPA

spontaneous physical activity.

References

  • 1. Silvestri C, Di Marzo V. The endocannabinoid system in energy homeostasis and the etiopathology of metabolic disorders. Cell Metab. 2013;17(4):475–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Mazier W, Saucisse N, Gatta-Cherifi B, Cota D. The endocannabinoid system: pivotal orchestrator of obesity and metabolic disease. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2015;26(10):524–537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Di Marzo V. The endocannabinoid system: its general strategy of action, tools for its pharmacological manipulation and potential therapeutic exploitation. Pharmacol Res. 2009;60(2):77–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Katona I, Freund TF. Endocannabinoid signaling as a synaptic circuit breaker in neurological disease. Nat Med. 2008;14(9):923–930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Iannotti FA, Di Marzo V, Petrosino S. Endocannabinoids and endocannabinoid-related mediators: targets, metabolism and role in neurological disorders. Prog Lipid Res. 2016;62:107–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Herling AW, Kilp S, Elvert R, Haschke G, Kramer W. Increased energy expenditure contributes more to the body weight-reducing effect of rimonabant than reduced food intake in candy-fed Wistar rats. Endocrinology. 2008;149(5):2557–2566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Addy C, Wright H, Van Laere K, Gantz I, Erondu N, Musser BJ, Lu K, Yuan J, Sanabria-Bohórquez SM, Stoch A, Stevens C, Fong TM, De Lepeleire I, Cilissen C, Cote J, Rosko K, Gendrano IN III, Nguyen AM, Gumbiner B, Rothenberg P, de Hoon J, Bormans G, Depré M, Eng WS, Ravussin E, Klein S, Blundell J, Herman GA, Burns HD, Hargreaves RJ, Wagner J, Gottesdiener K, Amatruda JM, Heymsfield SB. The acyclic CB1R inverse agonist taranabant mediates weight loss by increasing energy expenditure and decreasing caloric intake. Cell Metab. 2008;7(1):68–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Esposito I, Proto MC, Gazzerro P, Laezza C, Miele C, Alberobello AT, D’Esposito V, Beguinot F, Formisano P, Bifulco M. The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant stimulates 2-deoxyglucose uptake in skeletal muscle cells by regulating the expression of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;74(6):1678–1686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Cavuoto P, McAinch AJ, Hatzinikolas G, Cameron-Smith D, Wittert GA. Effects of cannabinoid receptors on skeletal muscle oxidative pathways. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007;267(1–2):63–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Tedesco L, Valerio A, Dossena M, Cardile A, Ragni M, Pagano C, Pagotto U, Carruba MO, Vettor R, Nisoli E. Cannabinoid receptor stimulation impairs mitochondrial biogenesis in mouse white adipose tissue, muscle, and liver: the role of eNOS, p38 MAPK, and AMPK pathways. Diabetes. 2010;59(11):2826–2836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ravussin E, Lillioja S, Anderson TE, Christin L, Bogardus C. Determinants of 24-hour energy expenditure in man: methods and results using a respiratory chamber. J Clin Invest. 1986;78(6):1568–1578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Jumpertz R, Guijarro A, Pratley RE, Piomelli D, Krakoff J. Central and peripheral endocannabinoids and cognate acylethanolamides in humans: association with race, adiposity, and energy expenditure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(3):787–791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Rodríguez de Fonseca F, Navarro M, Gómez R, Escuredo L, Nava F, Fu J, Murillo-Rodríguez E, Giuffrida A, LoVerme J, Gaetani S, Kathuria S, Gall C, Piomelli D. An anorexic lipid mediator regulated by feeding. Nature. 2001;414(6860):209–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gaetani S, Oveisi F, Piomelli D. Modulation of meal pattern in the rat by the anorexic lipid mediator oleoylethanolamide. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28(7):1311–1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Fu J, Gaetani S, Oveisi F, Lo Verme J, Serrano A, Rodríguez De Fonseca F, Rosengarth A, Luecke H, Di Giacomo B, Tarzia G, Piomelli D. Oleylethanolamide regulates feeding and body weight through activation of the nuclear receptor PPAR-α. Nature. 2003;425(6953):90–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Cinar R, Iyer MR, Liu Z, Cao Z, Jourdan T, Erdelyi K, Godlewski G, Szanda G, Liu J, Park JK, Mukhopadhyay B, Rosenberg AZ, Liow JS, Lorenz RG, Pacher P, Innis RB, Kunos G. Hybrid inhibitor of peripheral cannabinoid-1 receptors and inducible nitric oxide synthase mitigates liver fibrosis. JCI Insight. 2016;1(11):e87336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Heinitz S, Piaggi P, Vinales KL, Basolo A, Spranger J, Piomelli D, Krakoff J, Jumpertz von Schwartzenberg R. Specific skeletal muscle sphingolipid compounds in energy expenditure regulation and weight gain in Native Americans of Southwestern heritage. Int J Obes. 2017;41(10):1585–1593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Seino Y, Nanjo K, Tajima N, Kadowaki T, Kashiwagi A, Araki E, Ito C, Inagaki N, Iwamoto Y, Kasuga M, Hanafusa T, Haneda M, Ueki K; Committee of the Japan Diabetes Society on the Diagnostic Criteria of Diabetes Mellitus . Report of the committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2010;1(5):212–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jéquier E, Acheson K, Schutz Y. Assessment of energy expenditure and fuel utilization in man. Annu Rev Nutr. 1987;7(1):187–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ferraro R, Boyce VL, Swinburn B, De Gregorio M, Ravussin E. Energy cost of physical activity on a metabolic ward in relationship to obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53(6):1368–1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Bisek JP, Hanson J. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51(6):1106–1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Fu J, Dipatrizio NV, Guijarro A, Schwartz GJ, Li X, Gaetani S, Astarita G, Piomelli D. Sympathetic activity controls fat-induced oleoylethanolamide signaling in small intestine. J Neurosci. 2011;31(15):5730–5736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Schutz Y, Ravussin E, Diethelm R, Jequier E. Spontaneous physical activity measured by radar in obese and control subject studied in a respiration chamber. Int J Obes. 1982;6(1):23–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Piaggi P, Krakoff J, Bogardus C, Thearle MS. Lower “awake and fed thermogenesis” predicts future weight gain in subjects with abdominal adiposity. Diabetes. 2013;62(12):4043–4051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Piaggi P, Thearle MS, Bogardus C, Krakoff J. Lower energy expenditure predicts long-term increases in weight and fat mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(4):E703–E707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Zurlo F, Lillioja S, Esposito-Del Puente A, Nyomba BL, Raz I, Saad MF, Swinburn BA, Knowler WC, Bogardus C, Ravussin E. Low ratio of fat to carbohydrate oxidation as predictor of weight gain: study of 24-h RQ. Am J Physiol. 1990;259(5 Pt 1):E650–E657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Weyer C, Snitker S, Rising R, Bogardus C, Ravussin E. Determinants of energy expenditure and fuel utilization in man: effects of body composition, age, sex, ethnicity and glucose tolerance in 916 subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23(7):715–722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Cardinal P, Bellocchio L, Clark S, Cannich A, Klugmann M, Lutz B, Marsicano G, Cota D. Hypothalamic CB1 cannabinoid receptors regulate energy balance in mice. Endocrinology. 2012;153(9):4136–4143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jung K-M, Clapper JR, Fu J, D’Agostino G, Guijarro A, Thongkham D, Avanesian A, Astarita G, DiPatrizio NV, Frontini A, Cinti S, Diano S, Piomelli D. 2-Arachidonoylglycerol signaling in forebrain regulates systemic energy metabolism. Cell Metab. 2012;15(3):299–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Eckardt K, Sell H, Taube A, Koenen M, Platzbecker B, Cramer A, Horrighs A, Lehtonen M, Tennagels N, Eckel J. Cannabinoid type 1 receptors in human skeletal muscle cells participate in the negative crosstalk between fat and muscle. Diabetologia. 2008;52(4):664–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Matias I, Gonthier M-P, Orlando P, Martiadis V, De Petrocellis L, Cervino C, Petrosino S, Hoareau L, Festy F, Pasquali R, Roche R, Maj M, Pagotto U, Monteleone P, Di Marzo V. Regulation, function, and dysregulation of endocannabinoids in models of adipose and β-pancreatic cells and in obesity and hyperglycemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(8):3171–3180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Rolfe DF, Newman JM, Buckingham JA, Clark MG, Brand MD. Contribution of mitochondrial proton leak to respiration rate in working skeletal muscle and liver and to SMR. Am J Physiol. 1999;276(3 Pt 1):C692–C699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wang Z, O’Connor TP, Heshka S, Heymsfield SB. The reconstruction of Kleiber’s law at the organ-tissue level. J Nutr. 2001;131(11):2967–2970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Heymsfield SB, Thomas D, Bosy-Westphal A, Shen W, Peterson CM, Müller MJ. Evolving concepts on adjusting human resting energy expenditure measurements for body size. Obes Rev. 2012;13(11):1001–1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lipina C, Irving AJ, Hundal HS. Mitochondria: a possible nexus for the regulation of energy homeostasis by the endocannabinoid system? Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;307(1):E1–E13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Guzmán M, Lo Verme J, Fu J, Oveisi F, Blázquez C, Piomelli D. Oleoylethanolamide stimulates lipolysis by activating the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPAR-α). J Biol Chem. 2004;279(27):27849–27854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Pannacciulli N, Salbe AD, Ortega E, Venti CA, Bogardus C, Krakoff J. The 24-h carbohydrate oxidation rate in a human respiratory chamber predicts ad libitum food intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(3):625–632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Frankl J, Piaggi P, Foley JE, Krakoff J, Votruba SB. In vitro lipolysis is associated with whole-body lipid oxidation and weight gain in humans. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016;25(1):207–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Stefan N, Stumvoll M, Weyer C, Bogardus C, Tataranni PA, Pratley RE. Exaggerated insulin secretion in Pima Indians and African-Americans but higher insulin resistance in Pima Indians compared to African-Americans and Caucasians. Diabet Med. 2004;21(10):1090–1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Grosshans M, Schwarz E, Bumb JM, Schaefer C, Rohleder C, Vollmert C, Vollstädt-Klein S, Tost H, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Kiefer F, Leweke FM. Oleoylethanolamide and human neural responses to food stimuli in obesity. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(11):1254–1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society

RESOURCES