Skip to main content
Case Reports in Oncology logoLink to Case Reports in Oncology
. 2018 Nov 12;11(3):721–728. doi: 10.1159/000494081

Radiotherapy in Patients with Mycosis Fungoides and Central Nervous System Involvement

Garrett L Jensen a, Bouthaina S Dabaja b, Chelsea C Pinnix b, Jillian R Gunther b, Auris Huen c, Madeleine Duvic c, Yasuhiro Oki d, Michelle Fanale d, Chitra Hosing e, Sarah A Milgrom b,*
PMCID: PMC6276745  PMID: 30519174

Abstract

Background

Involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) by mycosis fungoides (MF) is rare; however, it portends a poor prognosis. While aggressive multimodality therapy may improve outcomes, the role of radiation therapy (RT) is not well defined.

Objectives

We sought to explore the efficacy of RT in the management of CNS involvement by MF.

Method

We retrospectively identified five patients with MF and CNS involvement who received cranial or craniospinal RT at a single institution. Patient characteristics, disease features, radiographic findings, treatments delivered, and outcome data were extracted from the electronic medical record.

Results

All 5 patients had neurologic deficits at RT initiation, and 4 experienced at least a partial improvement. Of 4 patients evaluated by MRI after RT completion, 3 had complete resolution of CNS disease within the irradiated field. At the time of last follow-up, all patients had died of MF. The median time to death was 7.4 months (range 1.0–21 months) from their diagnosis with CNS involvement and 1.2 months (range 0.4–7.1 months) from the end of RT treatment.

Conclusions

We observed high rates of radiographic response and palliation of neurological symptoms. Nonetheless, all patients succumbed to their disease shortly after treatment, confirming the poor prognosis of this condition. Our findings suggest that RT may play a valuable palliative role for these patients.

Keywords: Mycosis fungoides; Sezary syndrome; Cutaneous lymphoma; CNS, Brain

Introduction

Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary Syndrome are the most common forms of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma [1]. The disease can progress to involve extracutaneous sites, most commonly the lymph nodes, spleen, lungs, liver, bone, and kidney [2]. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement by MF is rare. In one series of 680 newly diagnosed cases of MF, 1.3% were found to have CNS involvement during follow-up [3]. In another series of 187 patients with MF, three patients (1.6%) experienced CNS involvement [4]. Although clinically apparent CNS involvement is uncommon, the rates of subclinical involvement may be higher. For example, in deceased patients with MF who underwent an autopsy, CNS involvement was observed in 11–14% of cases [2, 5, 6]. with the meninges more commonly involved than the brain parenchyma [7].

Outcomes are generally poor for patients with MF involving the CNS, with reported survival times in the range of 3–6 months [8, 9, 10]. Aggressive multimodality therapy may improve the prognosis; however, the role of radiation therapy (RT) is not well defined. We aimed to assess the efficacy of RT in the management of MF involving the CNS. Our primary outcomes were local disease control and palliation of neurologic symptoms. Secondarily, we evaluated survival times after the identification of CNS disease and after the completion of RT.

Case Series

After IRB approval was obtained, we identified all patients with CNS involvement by MF who were treated with cranial or craniospinal RT at a single institution from 2006 to 2016. Patient characteristics, disease features, radiographic findings, treatments delivered, and outcome data were extracted from the electronic medical record.

Results

Patient and Disease Characteristics

Five patients were identified who had CNS involvement by MF and were treated with cranial or craniospinal RT. Their characteristics at initial diagnosis through identification of CNS disease, and at the initiation of RT are presented in Table 1 and Table 2. The median age at the time of initial biopsy-proven MF was 65 years (34–69 years). Staging at the time of initial diagnosis with MF was IA (1 patient), IB (2 patients), IIB (1 patient), and IVB (1 patient). Before the identification of intracranial disease, 2 patients developed Sezary Syndrome and 4 developed visceral disease involvement. Large cell transformation (LCT) was confirmed in 4 patients at a median time from diagnosis of 3 years (range 0–21 years).

Table 1.

Patient characteristics at MF diagnosis until identification of CNS disease

Case, n Age, gender at initial Dx, years Stage at initial Dx Worst stage prior to CNS involvement Time from initial Dx to CNS disease, years Time from initial Dx to LCT, years Ever CD30+ Therapies prior to CNS involvement, non-RT RT prior to cranial RT Neurologic symptoms Radiographic evidence of disease (parenchymal, LMD, cord involvement) CSF Biopsy Other sites of non-cutaneous, extra-cranial disease at CNS Dx Skin involvement, BSA (weeks prior to CNS involvement)
1 65, M IVB IVB 1.4 1.2 N Phototherapy, interferon alfa-2b, topical/systemic steroids, gemcitabine, doxorubicin, bexarotene Local RT to skin, nodes, oropharynx, and right orbit LE weakness Leptomeningeal disease of the cauda equina + Y LN, ST, head and neck, 50% (–3)

2 66, M IIB IVB 0.7 N/A N Plaquenil, dapsone Local RT to right eye and orbit None Epidural disease of thoracic spine + N Muscle, bone, ST 6% (–3)

3 46, M IB IIB 20.7 20.5 Y Topical steroids, nitrogen mustard, bexarotene, phototherapy, acitretin Local RT to skin Ataxia, aphasia Brain parenchymal disease Y bone 0.1 (0)

4 69, M IA IVB 3.9 4.9 Y Topical/systemic steroids, phototherapy, bexarotene, interferon, forodesine, zanolimumab, nitrogen mustard, vorinostat TSEB, Lumbosacral spine LE weakness Epidural disease, brain parenchymal involvement Unk Y Bone, muscle 13 (1.4)

5 34, F IB IVA 1.2 0.1 Y Topical steroids, phototherapy, interferon alfa-2b, hyper-CVAD CN VII palsy, LE weakness Sacral nerve root and brain parenchymal disease N LN <0.01 (0)

Dx, diagnosis; yrs, years; CNS, central nervous system; CD, cluster of differentiation; RT, radiotherapy; CVAD, cyclophosphamide vincristine doxorubicin; TSEB, total skin electron beam; LE, lower extremity; CN, cranial nerve; Unk, unknown; LN, lymph nodes; ST, soft tissue; BSA, body surface area.

Table 2.

CNS RT, response, and outcome

Case, n Time from CNS Dx to cranial RT, months Therapy after CNS Dx, prior to cranial RT Neurologic symptoms at RT initiation Radiographic evidence of disease at RT initiation RT target, dose/fraction Neurological symptom improvement? Best radiographic response (CR, PR, SD/PD); time from RT completion to imaging study, days Treatments subsequent to RT Time to CNS relapse, days; location Time to extracranial relapse/progression, days; location Time to death from CNS Dx/CNS RT, months
1 0.5 None LE weakness LMD of cauda equina Modified CSI* brain and thoracic spine 20 Gy/10, lumbosacral spine (26 Gy/13) Y Progression in unirradiated portion of brain**; 14 Focal RT to skin lesions 14; unirradiated brain** 14; skin 1.4/0.9

2 6.2 Hyper-CVAD LE weakness, blurry vision, CN palsy LMD, infiltration of orbits Brain and eye 28 Gy/14 Y CR; 15 Intrathecal cytarabine 12; lymph nodes, ST 7.4/1.2

3 13.0 R-MPV, carmustine/ thiotepa, HD-MTX Gait instability Enhancing brain parenchymal lesions Brain 30.6 Gy/17 to whole brain, 36 Gy/17 to pre-chemotherapy site of gadolinium-enhancing disease Y CR; 17 High dose MTX, TSEB, allogeneic SCT with fludarabine/melp halan, local RT to skin/ST 118; brain parenchyma 102; skin, muscle, ST 20.1/7.1

4 12.5 Spinal RT, CMED, Auto SCT with BEAM LE weakness and pain Cord LMD CSI brain and upper spine 28 Gy/14, lower spine 19.8 Gy/11 N PR; 7 79; skin, muscle, ST 15.7/3.2

5 0.6 None UE and LE weakness blurry vision Enhancing brain parenchymal lesions CSI 30.4 Gy/19 Y Unknown*** Intrathecal MTX, cytarabine 1/0.4

CNS, central nervous system; Dx, diagnosis; RT, radiotherapy; CVAD, cyclophosphamide vincristine doxorubicin; R-MPV, Rituxan Methotrexate Leucovorin Procarbazine; HD- MTX, high-dose methotrexate; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; LE, lower extremity; UE, upper extremity; LMD, leptomeningeal disease; CMED, cyclophosphamide methotrexate etoposide dexamethasone; SCT, stem cell transplant; BEAM, carmustine etoposide cytarabine melphalan; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ST, soft tissue; CSI, craniospinal irradiation; MTX, methotrexate; TSEB, total skin electron beam.

*

lower brain, skull base, and cervical spine were not included in modified CSI field, due to prior RT;

**

disease progressed within the gap in the modified CSI plan;

***

no imaging was performed after radiotherapy.

The median time from the initial MF diagnosis to the identification of CNS involvement was 1.4 years (range 1–21 years). In the patient with a prolonged interval of 21 years between the initial MF diagnosis and the identification of CNS disease, LCT occurred soon before intracranial involvement was diagnosed. Neurologic deficits were present in 4 patients when intracranial involvement was identified. The final patient was asymptomatic, with epidural disease in the thoracic spine discovered incidentally on imaging and malignant cells identified in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on a confirmatory lumbar puncture. At the time of diagnosis with CNS involvement, all 5 patients had radiographic evidence of disease. CSF was assessed in 4 patients and contained malignant cells in 2 patients. A biopsy confirmed CNS involvement in 3 patients. When CNS disease was identified, all patients had active cutaneous disease (T1 in 3 patients, T2 in 2 patients). In addition, 4 of 5 patients had extra-cranial, non-cutaneous metastases.

Radiation Therapy Information

Patients received RT at a median of 6.2 months (range 0.5–13 months) after the identification of CNS disease. At the initiation of RT, all 5 patients had radiographic evidence of CNS disease and had neurologic deficits. For 2 patients (cases 1 and 5), RT was the first therapy given after the identification of CNS disease. Three patients (cases 2, 3, and 4) received CNS-directed chemotherapy after the identification of intracranial disease and prior to RT; all 3 of these patients experienced CNS disease progression while on chemotherapy, so salvage RT was recommended.

RT targeted the whole brain (WBRT) to a median total dose of 28 Gy (range 20–30.6 Gy) at a median of 2 Gy/fraction (range 1.6–2). In addition, one patient received a boost to the gross disease of an additional 11 Gy (total dose to gross disease 36 Gy). Three patients were treated to the spine, in addition to the brain, with comprehensive craniospinal irradiation (CSI). In one patient treated with CSI (case 1), the inferior brain, skull base, and cervical spine were excluded from the treatment volume to respect normal tissue tolerance, because this patient had received RT to the scalp, oral cavity and oropharynx previously.

Response to Radiation Therapy

After completion of RT, 4 patients were evaluated by MRI (cases 1–4). In 2 patients (cases 2–3), the MRI revealed complete resolution of all evidence of CNS disease. In 1 patient (case 4), MRI revealed no evidence of disease in the brain and a significant reduction in spinal epidural disease; however, persistent mild enhancement of the cauda equina was appreciated, so residual leptomeningeal disease could not be excluded. In the final patient (case 1), an MRI showed no evidence of disease within the irradiated area; however, CNS disease progressed within the unirradiated gap between the cranial and spinal fields.

All 5 patients had neurologic deficits at the initiation of RT. Of these, 4 experienced at least a partial improvement in these symptoms. One patient (case 4) had a partial radiographic response to CSI without any corresponding symptomatic improvement. Four of the 5 patients with extremity weakness or impaired gait had improvement after RT. All patients with blurry vision (case 2 and 5) and cranial nerve palsy (case 2) experienced symptomatic relief.

The therapies given after RT are summarized in Table 2. Three patients received additional CNS-directed chemotherapy. Additionally, one patient underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation with fludarabine and melphalan conditioning.

Two patients experienced CNS disease progression after the completion of RT. As described above, case 1 experienced disease progression within the unirradiated gap in the modified CSI plan. Progression was identified 14 days after completion of modified CSI, when the patient presented with a facial nerve palsy. In addition, case 3 achieved a complete response to WBRT, and then was treated with total skin electron beam therapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation with fludarabine and melphalan. Subsequently, his disease progressed in the brain, skin, and muscle. Relapse within the brain was first appreciated 4 months after the completion of RT in a region that had received 30.6 Gy.

At the time of last follow-up, all patients had died of MF. The median time to death was 7.4 months (range 1.0–21 months) from their diagnosis with CNS involvement and 1.2 months (range 0.4–7.1 months) from the end of RT.

Discussion/Conclusion

In this series of 5 patients with MF and CNS involvement, we identified high rates of radiographic and clinical disease response to RT. All patients who were evaluated by MRI after the completion of RT achieved at least a partial response in the irradiated area. Furthermore, 4 of the 5 patients with neurologic deficits at the initiation of RT achieved at least a partial improvement in their symptoms. These findings demonstrate an important role of RT to provide local control and palliation of neurologic deficits. The high response rates are consistent with the known radiosensitivity of primary cutaneous lymphoma [11]. Three patients in this cohort experienced CNS disease progression while receiving CNS-directed chemotherapy, prior to treatment with salvage RT; their disease responded to RT, suggesting that CNS MF remains responsive to RT, even if it has been refractory to other CNS-directed therapy.

Despite these high rates of CNS disease response to RT, OS times were short, confirming the poor prognosis of this condition. From the time of identification of CNS disease, the median survival was 7.4 months (range 1.0–21 months); from the time of completion of cranial RT, the median survival was only 1.2 months (range 0.4–7.1 months). These findings are consistent with previously published outcomes of patients with MF involving the CNS, with median survival periods of just six months [6, 9, 12, 13, 14] and only three months in patients treated with RT alone [3, 5, 6, 7, 14]. Nonetheless, prolonged OS is possible. Patients in the literature with the longest reported survival times received aggressive CNS-directed therapy and had limited systemic involvement [8, 9, 13, 15]. Bird et al. demonstrated particularly good survival outcomes of 10,10, 23, and 33 months using temozolamide +/– MTX, with low-dose WBRT. The long-term survivors in that study had no other visceral disease involvement, suggesting that CNS-directed therapy can result in long-term survival in patients with limited extracranial disease [15]. Consistent with these findings, 2 patients in our series experienced survival times > 15 months after the identification of CNS disease. These two patients received aggressive multi-modality therapy and had systemic involvement that was limited to bone and/or muscle.

Multiple features of our patients are consistent with other cases in the literature. For example, all patients developed neurologic deficits from their CNS disease, 4 of 5 had visceral organ involvement, and 4 of 5 experienced LCT. Likewise, other researchers have shown that CNS involvement by MF may be associated with severe neurologic deficits and is more common in patients with visceral organ involvement or LCT [3, 6, 7]. In one study, the risk of CNS involvement was associated with T3–4, N3, B1, or M1 stage disease at initial diagnosis. The presence of at least two of these four factors indicated a 15.6% 10-year risk rate of developing CNS involvement. This risk rose to 36% when other (i.e. non-CNS) visceral sites were involved during the clinical course of the disease [3].

Several patients in this series had unique presentations. Patient 3 had a prolonged time of 21 years between his initial diagnosis with MF and the development of CNS disease, which occurred shortly after LCT was identified. In other reports, CNS disease has been identified earlier, typically within 5 years of the upfront MF diagnosis [5, 8]. Patient 2, who did not have LCT, was asymptomatic at presentation. It is rare for CNS involvement to be an incidental radiographic finding, since it is not screened for in MF. Typically, patients present with neurologic symptoms, such as confusion, nausea, headaches, gait difficulties, lethargy and weakness [9].

We conclude that RT is a valuable tool for providing palliation of neurologic symptoms due to CNS involvement in this population. In the setting of extensive CNS disease and/or limited systemic burden, we advocate for comprehensive irradiation of the neuroaxis (i.e. CSI), with the aim of providing durable CNS disease control. However, in the setting of significant extra-cranial disease, survival times are short, so irradiation of a more limited field (ex. WBRT) may be appropriate. Our findings confirm the poor prognosis of MF that has spread to the CNS and suggest the need for aggressive local and systemic therapy, which may extend survival, especially in the setting of limited visceral disease.

Statement of Ethics

The authors have no ethical conflicts to disclose.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Sources

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author Contributions

G.L.J. and S.A.M. collected the clinical data and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the study concept and reviewed the final manuscript.

Acknowledgement

None.

References

  • 1.Foss FM, Girardi M. Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2017 Apr;31((2)):297–315. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2016.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Epstein EH, Jr, Levin DL, Croft JD, Jr, Lutzner MA. MYCOSIS FUNGOIDES. Mycosis Fungoides. Med. Baltim. 1972;51((1)):61–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stein M, Farrar N, Jones GW, Wilson LD, Fox L, Wong RK, et al. Central neurologic involvement in mycosis fungoides: ten cases, actuarial risk assessment, and predictive factors. Cancer J. 2006 Jan-Feb;12((1)):55–62. doi: 10.1097/00130404-200601000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kaufman DK, Habermann TM, Kurtin PJ, O'Neill BP. Neurological complications of peripheral and cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Ann Neurol. 1994 Oct;36((4)):625–9. doi: 10.1002/ana.410360411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hallahan D, Griem M, Griem S, Duda E, Baron J. Mycosis fungoides involving the central nervous system. J Clin Oncol. 1986 Nov;4((11)):1638–44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.11.1638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tien RD, Brown M, Massey EW. CNS mycosis fungoides: CT and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992 Jul-Aug;16((4)):529–33. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199207000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zonenshayn M, Sharma S, Hymes K, Knopp EA, Golfinos JG, Zagzag D. Mycosis fungoides metastasizing to the brain parenchyma: case report. Neurosurgery. 1998 Apr;42((4)):933–7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199804000-00144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li N, Kim JH, Glusac EJ. Brainstem involvement by mycosis fungoides in a patient with large-cell transformation: a case report and review of literature. J Cutan Pathol. 2003 May;30((5)):326–31. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2003.00061.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vu BA, Duvic M. Central nervous system involvement in patients with mycosis fungoides and cutaneous large-cell transformation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Aug;59((2 Suppl 1)):S16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lally A, Hollowood K, Whittaker S, Turner R. Central nervous system involvement in stage 1b mycosis fungoides. Br J Dermatol. 2007 Oct;157((4)):815–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08075.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cotter GW, Baglan RJ, Wasserman TH, Mill W. Palliative radiation treatment of cutaneous mycosis fungoides—a dose response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1983 Oct;9((10)):1477–80. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(83)90321-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Beylot-Barry M, Dubus P, Vergier B, Cogrel O, Marit G, Beylot C, et al. Meningeal involvement by a transformed mycosis fungoides following Hodgkin's disease. Br J Dermatol. 1999 Nov;141((5)):909–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.03168.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bodensteiner DC, Skikne B. Central nervous system involvement in mycosis fungoides: diagnosis, treatment and literature review. Cancer. 1982 Sep;50((6)):1181–4. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820915)50:6<1181::aid-cncr2820500625>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Grevelink SA, Fuller GN, Olsen EA. Central nervous system involvement by cutaneous T cell lymphoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991 Sep;25((3)):542–9. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70237-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bird TG, Whittaker S, Wain EM, Child F, Morris SL. Temozolomide for central nervous system involvement in mycosis fungoides. Int J Dermatol. 2016 Jul;55((7)):751–6. doi: 10.1111/ijd.13007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Case Reports in Oncology are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES