Skip to main content
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering logoLink to Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering
. 2018 Jun 29;16(2):147–158. doi: 10.1007/s40201-018-0303-9

Physiochemical characteristics and oxidative potential of ambient air particulate matter (PM10) during dust and non-dust storm events: a case study in Tehran, Iran

Soheila Rezaei 1, Kazem Naddafi 1,2,, Mohammad Sadegh Hassanvand 2, Ramin Nabizadeh 1,2, Masud Yunesian 1,3, Maryam Ghanbarian 1, Zahra Atafar 1, Maryam Faraji 1, Shahrokh Nazmara 1,4, Babak Mahmoudi 1, Mohammad Ghanbari Ghozikali 5, Masoud ghanbarian 6, Akbar Gholampour 7,8
PMCID: PMC6277329  PMID: 30728987

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the characteristics of metal(loid)s, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and oxidative potential (OP) in PM10 during dust and non-dust days in a rural and an urban area in Tehran. Water-soluble ions, metal(loid)s, PAHs, and OP were measured using ion chromatography (IC), inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and dithiothreitol (DTT) assay respectively. The results showed that the average concentrations of ambient PM10 were 284 ± 90.4 and 123 ± 31.4 μg m−3 on dusty and regular days in urban areas respectively, and were 258 ± 48.3 and 124 ± 41.4 μg m−3 on dusty and regular days in rural areas, respectively; these values were 95% above the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline level. The crustal elements Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Al, Si, Fe and Ti were the dominant for PM10 on dusty days, and NO3 and SO42− were dominant for PM10 on regular days. The average ± SD concentrations of total PAHs were 34.3 ± 22.5 and 55.1 ± 28.3 ng m−3 on dusty and regular days, respectively, with the maximum value occurring on inversion days. The average OP was 8.90 ± 7.15 and 1.41 ± 0.35 and was 11.4 ± 3.97 and 19.9 ± 8.67 (nmol min−1 μg PM10−1) for water and methanol extracts on dusty and regular days, respectively, with the lowest value occurring on dusty days. The OP was highly associated with Cu and Mn. Briefly; the results of this study demonstrate that OP is mass independent and consequence a promising proxy for PM mass.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40201-018-0303-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Particulate matter, Dust storm, Chemical characteristics, Oxidative potential, DTT assay, Tehran

Introduction

Particulate matter (PM) are most usually classified according to their size as PM2.5 (with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 μm) and PM10 (with an aerodynamic diameter less than 10 μm). PM2.5 is often produced from combustion processes and formation as secondary particles [1]. PM10 is generated by mechanical activities and road dust as well as from natural resources such as pollen and volcanoes [2, 3]. A dust storm is a meteorological phenomenon and usually occur when the wind speed exceeds the threshold value at which particles are removed from the soil [4, 5]. During these events, which can last for several days, the PM10 concentrations are nearly 2–3 times higher than that of regular days [6, 7]. Hence, dust events play an important role in PM10 pollution [79].

Numerous epidemiological studies have shown effects of PM on mortality and morbidity [1015]. In most such investigations, these effects have been associated with the mass concentration of PM, but a major part of this mass is biologically inactivated [16, 17]. Although the current standards of PM are based on particle mass alone, but PM toxicity is more complicated and is based on a combination of PM characteristics, including the number, size, surface area, and chemical compounds [18]. Based on various toxicological studies, the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) including hydroxyl radicals (OH°), superoxide anion (O2°), hydrogen peroxide (HOOH), and oxygen radicals can react with membrane lipids, nucleic acids, proteins, and enzymes and cause cell damage [1921]. Oxidative stress which is the imbalance between ROS generation and antioxidant defenses, is caused when ROS or other oxidants overcome the body’s natural defense system [22].

Several studies have determined that the oxidative potential (OP) may be more integrative health base measurement rather than the mass concentration of PM alone [2325]. The ability of PM to oxidize its target molecules is called its OP, and this indicator has shown a stronger association between the biological responses of the body and exposure to PM [10, 26]. The OP of PM may be caused by organic compounds, metals, and other active chemical compounds [15, 16]. Therefore, the OP can be used as a quantitative probe to evaluate the capacity of PM to catalyze the formation of ROS that cause oxidative stress [10, 17].

Various approaches, cellular and acellular assays, exist for measuring the OP of PM. The acellular assay requires fewer controlled environments and determines the OP faster than the cellular assay does [27] . There are various acellular assays used to study the OP of PM, each of which has a different sensitivity to redox active chemical compounds, but there is no theoretical agreement on the most appropriate method. The Electron spin resonance (ESR) method measures the ability of the particle to generate hydroxyl radicals in the presence of H2O2 when using spin trap such as 5,5-dimethylpyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO). Another technique is to measure the ability of PM to reduce antioxidants such as ascorbic acid (AA), glutathione (GSH), and uric acid. The Dichlorofluorescein (DCFH) assay, in which the oxidation of DCFH to fluorescent compound (DCF) is measured in the presence of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) [2830]. DTT is one of the most widely used methods and can be considered a technique for measuring a particle’s capacity for ROS generation. The DTT method measures the redox activity of a sample based on the potential of PM to catalyze the electron transfer between DTT and O2. The reaction rate is usually called the DTT activity and is determined through measuring the DTT consumption over time, which is proportional to the ROS generation potential of PM [3135]. Cho et al. [36] showed that the DTT method can be a proper measure of redox activity in by determining the formation of superoxide radical in the first step of ROS formation. Li et al. [37] demonstrated that DTT consumption by PM is directly related to their potential to create stress proteins in the cell. Nevertheless, DTT is not a respiratory tract lining fluid (RTLF) but can be considered as a substitute for glutathione as an oxidizing compound in similar biological conditions in the potassium phosphate buffer [28, 38].

PM has become a critical pollutant in Tehran [39]. Based on the most recent report by WHO [40] in May 2016, Tehran ranked 331st in terms of PM10 among the 2972 cities studied According to the WHO report on PM pollutants in different cities, more than 80% of the world’s population is exposed to air pollution above the standard limits. In Tehran, PM is due mostly to the combustion of motor vehicles, brake abrasion, tire wear and the operation of industrial units [41]. It should be noted that during the recent years, the entry of dust from the western borders of the country has been added to the sources of this pollutant. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies on the OP of PM in Tehran using the DTT assay. Thus, the main aims of the present study were to determine the redox activity of PM10 during dusty and non-dusty (inversion) days; to specify the relationship between different physicochemical characteristics of PM and OP; and to compare the OP of PM between urban and rural areas.

Material and methods

Site locations

In the present study, two sampling locations were selected to collect PM with different physicochemical characteristics (Fig. 1). The urban area (35° 42′ 71″ N, 51° 23′ 19″ E) was 8 m from a local two-way street and 70 m away from a major 4-lane street in Tehran [42]. The number of motor vehicles passing the major 4-lane street was 2.6–3.8 thousands vehicles per day, 80% of which were light-duty; the rest were heavy-duty vehicles. The PM released at this sampling point was mainly influenced by vehicles. The rural area (35° 38′ 10″ N, 51° 12′ 77″ E) was located in the upwind of southwestern of Tehran, where the PM originated mainly from natural sources. The samplers placed on the rooftop at 10 m and 5 m above the ground for urban and rural respectively.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Location of the study area to show the sampling sites

Sampling protocol

Sampling was conducted from April 21 to June 7, 2016, and September 24 to November 15, 2016, for spring and autumn, respectively. PM10 samples were simultaneously collected using high volume samplers (Graseby-Andersen) operating at flow rate 1.3 ± 0.11 m3 min−1 on fiberglass filters (20.3 cm × 25.4 cm) at two sampling locations for 24 h. The total number of samples collected was 44 and 42 at the urban and rural locations, respectively. The meteorological data including the temperature, wind speed and wind direction were obtained from local meteorological monitoring stations near the sampling locations.

Identification of dusty day

To determine the PM10 concentrations associated with desert dust storms, a two-step approach based on Guidance to Member States on PM10 Monitoring and Inter-Comparisons With the Reference Method [43] and some studies [3, 8, 44] was used:

  1. Days with average daily concentrations above the 90th percentile; in the present study, values greater than 200 and 195 μg m−3 at urban and rural locations, respectively, were selected [8].

  2. After selecting days based on the above criteria, days with a PM2.5/PM10 ratio less than 0.3 were considered. Because based on the results of others studies [6, 41, 45] the coarse PM are usually of natural origin and fine PM are usually of anthropogenic origin, thus, the presence of a low PM2.5/PM10 ratio indicates natural PM sources. To calculate the PM2.5/PM10 ratio, we used data from stations that were close to the study locations.

Inversion days were determined according to the National Meteorological Organization.

Gravimetric analysis of PM10

To reduce organic background, fiberglass filters were baked at 550 °C for at least 5 h prior to sampling. To determine the mass concentration of PM10, the filters were stored at 22–24 °C with a relative humidity of 40–45% for 48 h before and after sampling and were then weighted using a microbalance (Mettler-Toledo Inc.) with a sensitivity of 0.002 mg. The samples were covered with aluminum foil and frozen at −20 °C until extraction.

Chemical analyses

Water-soluble ion analysis

First, 10 cm2 of each filter was placed into a sterile polypropylene centrifuge tube, and 20 ml of double deionized water (specific resistance ≥18 Ω cm) was added. Then, the samples were sonicated at 40 KHz for 60 min in a water bath ultrasonic cleaner (Elmasonic). During sonication, the bath temperature was monitored to avoid exceeding 27 °C. Hence, to maintain the temperature at an acceptable level during sonication, ice cubes were added to the bath. To complete the particle extraction, the samples were shaken for 60 min. At the end, the resulting solution was filtered using the 0.22 μm syringe filter (Schleicher & Schuell) and kept at 4 °C in the refrigerator until analysis. The water-soluble ions measured in this study were sodium (Na+), ammonium (NH4+), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg2+), calcium (Ca2+), chloride (Cl), fluoride (F), nitrate (NO3) and sulfate (SO42−), and were analyzed by Ion Chromatography (Metrohm 850 Professional IC,Switzerland at a flow rate of 0.7 ml min−1) [6].

Metal (loid)s analysis

One tenth of each filter was placed in digestion vessels and an extraction solution containing 0.1 ml of HF, 3 ml of HNO3 and 1 ml of HCLO4 was added [46]. Then, the samples were digested using a microwave (ETHOS-1600, Milestone, Italy). The sample vessels irradiated at 1500 W and 130°C for 23 min. Then, the digested sample volume was increased to 15 ml using pure deionized water (specific resistance ≥18 Ω cm), and passed through a 0.45 μm syringe filter (Schleicher & Schuell). Finally, the end solutions were analyzed using ICP-OES to determine the concentrations of metals, including Al, As, Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Se, Si, Sn, Sr, Li, Ti, V, Zn and Mo.

PAHs analysis

To extract and determine the amount of PAHs, one fifth of each filter was placed in a 20-ml vial. Then, 10 ml of methanol/dichloromethane mixture (1:1 v/v) was added to each sample and stirred for 2 min. The vials were sonicated at 130 KHz for 30 min in a water bath ultrasonic cleaner (Elmasonic). Then, the methanol/dichloromethane mixture was filtered through 22 μm PTFE filters (Jet Biofil). This aliquot was dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen. After the samples were completely dried, 1 ml of methanol/dichloromethane was added to each vial, transferred to the headspace vials [47], and analyzed by a GC/MS equipped with a fused silica capillary column (DB-5MS). The 16 PAHs species including Naphthalene (Naph), Acenaphthylene (Acy),Acenaphthene (Ace), Fluorene (Flu), Phenanthrene (Phen), Anthracene(Anth), Fluoranthene (Flt), Pyrene (Pyr), Benzo[a]anthracene (BaA),Chrysene (Chr), Benzo[b]fluoroanthene (BbF), Benzo[k]fluoroanthene(BkF), Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene (DahA), Benzo[ghi]perylene (BghiP), and Indeno[123-cd]pyrene (Ind) were analyzed.

OP analysis

DTT method procedure

To extract for DTT analysis, 10 cm2 of each filter was placed in 10 ml of deionized water (specific resistance ≥18 Ω cm) and methanol separately in the sterile polypropylene centrifuge tubes and stirred for 5 min. The sample was sonicated at 130 KHz for 30 min in a water bath ultrasonic cleaner (Elmasonic), and then passed through 0.22 μm PTFE filters (Jet Biofil). The extraction efficiency was approximately 73% of PM from the filters. The concentration of the samples with suspended particles was 15–40 μg mL−1. In this study, we followed the method of Cho et al. [33, 36]. First, 3.5 ml of the extracted particles with 1 ml of potassium phosphate buffer (0.1 M) at pH 7.4 treated with Chelex 100 resin (sodium form, Biorad) was placed in the sterilized polypropylene centrifuge tube and 0.5 ml of DTT (100 μM) was added to the mixture. The DTT/phosphate solution mixture was incubated at 37 °C with continuous shaking at 400 rpm at designated time intervals (5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 min).

During the incubation period, the DTT absorption was reduced due to DTT oxidation. After each incubation time (for example, 5 min), 100 μl of the incubated mixture was transferred to another centrifuge tube and 1 ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA 1% w = v) was added to stop the reaction. Then, 50 μl of 5,50-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB 10 mM) was added to the mixture, stirred properly, and allowed to react for 5 min. Subsequently, 2 ml of Tris-Base (0.08 M with 4 mM EDTA) at pH 8.9 was added. The DTT reaction with DTNB resulted in the formation of the yellow 2-nitro-5-thiobenzoic acid (TNB) solution that was stable for 2 h at room temperature. Finally, the TNB absorption (Abs) level was measured using the UV/VIS spectrophotometer (DR 5000, Hach) at a wavelength of 412 nm. The absorption versus time curve was drawn (Fig. S1, Supplementary material) and the DTT consumption was calculated using the Eq. S1, S2 (see Eq. S1, S2, Supplementary material). Since DTT and TNB are sensitive to light, the tests were performed under an exhaust hood in a dark room and in aluminum-coated vials. DTT activity is expressed based on mass (DTTm nnmol min −1 m −3), and volume (DTTv nmol min−1 μg−1). DTTm shows the inherent characteristics of the PM related to the source and is suitable for comparing the relative OP of the PM from different sources, whereas DTTv shows the public exposure [48].

Data quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC)

For QA/QC, the laboratory and field blanks, duplicate, and spike samples were analyzed with other samples for each type of chemical analysis. For every 10 samples, a blank filter was used. The recovery efficiencies of 16 PAHs species were 64–104%, 94–106% for the water soluble ions, 65–108% for metal(loid)s and 85–96% for DTT assay. On average, among all of the sample analyses, the mean concentration of the field blank was less than 10% that of the samples. The limit of detection (LOD) was determined to be three times that of the standard deviation of the blank values (Table S1, Supplementary material). Then, the mean blank values were deduced from concentration of the samples that were greater than LOD for all the analyses.

Statistical analyses

The results were expressed in mean ± SD. First, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used to examine the normality of data, and the correlation between OP and the physicochemical characteristics of PM was evaluated by SPSS ver. 20 (IBM Corp.,USA) for each sampling point using spearman’s correlation coefficient. Since the distribution of data was not normal, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to evaluate the difference in particle specifications at two sampling locations, and a statistically significant level was considered when Pvalue ≤ 0.05.

Results and discussion

PM10 mass concentrations

On the basis of the criteria mentioned for selecting dust storm days, 5 days were considered dusty days. Table 1 shows a summary of the average concentration of PM10 and the ratios of dust/regular and inversion/regular during the sampling period in the urban and rural areas. Accordingly, the daily average concentration of PM10 was 140 and 137 μg m−3, which was 100 and 95% above the WHO guidelines and 60 and 39% above the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Iranian standards (150 μg m−3) in urban and rural areas, respectively. A significant difference was observed based on the concentration of PM10 in three different meteorological phenomena: dusty, inversion, and regular days (Pvalue ≤ 0.05).

Table 1.

The average of PM10 mass concentration (μg m−3) and meteorological data (±standard deviation)

Location PM10 concentration(μg/m3) Dusty/Regular Inversion/Regular
Dusty Inversion Regular All days
Urban 284 ± 90.4 220 ± 17.1 123 ± 31.4 140 ± 54 2.31 1.79
Rural 258.4 ± 48.3 162 ± 15.8 124 ± 41.4 137 ± 54 2.08 1.31

As shown in Table 1, on the dusty days, the average PM10 mass concentration was 2.31 and 2.08 times greater than concentrations on regular days in the urban and rural areas, respectively. Tehran is surrounded by deserts and the dominant wind in Tehran moves from west and southwest to east and northeast and may have the potential to move the particles from these sources to Tehran. Thus, one of the sources of pollution in Tehran is the dust phenomenon [49]. The average concentration PM10 is higher under inversion conditions than on regular days and is 1.79 and 1.31 times greater in urban and rural areas, respectively. This may be due to Tehran’s roughness due to its geographical position, i.e., between mountains, as well as the presence of high buildings, which most likely block the winds from the mountains to the plains and, as a result, cause atmospheric stability and the temperature inversion phenomenon during cold weather [41].

PM10 chemical components

Water-soluble ions

The average concentrations and standard deviation of water-soluble ions measured for PM10 in dusty, inversion and regular days for two sampling sites can be found in Table S2 from Supplementary material. The total concentration of water-soluble ions was 26 and 30% of PM10 mass in urban and rural areas, respectively. The ions in PM10 for the urban and rural areas were present in the order: NO3 > SO42− > Cl > Ca2+ > NH4+ > K+ > Na+ > F > Mg2+ for the urban location and SO42 − + > NO3 > Cl > Ca2+ > Na+ > NH4+ > K+ > F > Mg2 + for the rural location. Sulfate and nitrate were dominant ions in PM10. These results are consistent with those of other studies [50, 51]. Nitrate and sulfate ions have no functional groups, for ROS formation, but they may increase the solubility of soluble metals and, thus, their bioavailability in cells, thereby affecting their redox-OP activity by decreasing the pH of the particles [52].

Based on Wang classification [53], three categories were identified in dusty, inversion and regular days: crustal PM10 (enriched with Na+, Mg2+, and Ca2+), combustional and crustal PM10 (enriched with K+, SO42−, and Cl), and combustional PM10 (enriched with NO3 and NH4+). A statistically significant difference (Pvalue ≤ 0.05) was found between the concentrations of crustal PM10 and combustional PM10 in three different meteorological phenomena (dusty, inversion, and regular days). As shown in Fig. 2, regardless of the sampling site, crustal PM10 (Na+,Mg2+, and Ca2+) resulting from resuspended soil dust had a maximum value on dusty days and a minimum value on inversion days because the main source of PM on dusty days was soil compounds. Lough [54] reported that Na+, Mg2 + and Ca2+ were resuspended compounds. The maximum value of combustional PM10 (NO3, NH4+), or secondary inorganic aerosols, occurred on inversion days. During stable weather conditions, the low dispersion of pollutants resulted in higher levels of pollutants [47].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The contribution of different ion groups to the total ion mass in PM10 on dusty, inversion and regular days at urban (a) and rural (b) locations; crustal PM10: (sum Na+,Mg2+ and Ca2+); combustional and crustal PM10: (sum K+, SO42− and Cl); combustion PM10: (sum NO3, NH4+)

The increased concentration of these compounds may have been due to the oxidation of gas-like precursors via NH4+ existing in the atmosphere to form photochemical byproducts. The major form of NH4+ is ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate, which are formed from gas-like precursors by secondary processes [29, 48, 52].

In accordance with Eq. (1): [41], non-sea-salt sulfates (nss-SO42−), regardless of their sampling location, comprised 93% of the total sulfate in PM10, thus reflecting the importance of anthropogenic sources in Tehran air pollution.

nssSO42=SO420.246×Na+ 1

The NO3/SO42− ratio is used as an indicator of the relative importance of moving sources against fixed sources [53]. This ratio had higher values in the urban areas than rural areas (Fig. S2, Supplementary material), thus indicating the significance of mobile sources in Tehran, consistent with the results of Hassanvand et al. [6].

Metal(loid)s

Metals are the one of the critical PM compounds that can lead to the formation of intrinsic ROS The main sources of transition metals are traffic and industrial emissions, which are due to combustion or mechanical processes [19]. The mean (SD) levels of metal(loid)s in urban and rural PM10 are summarized in Table S2 (Supplementary material). The relative frequency of metals in the urban and rural areas is as follows: Si > Fe > Al > Ti > Mn > Pb > Ba>Cu > Cr > Zn > Ni > As> Li > V > Mo > Sr > Cd > Co > Sn > Se for urban area and Si > Fe > Al > Zn > Mn > Pb > Cu > Ba> Ti > Cr > Ni > Cd > V > Mo > Co > Sn > Li > As> Sr > Se for rural area. Si, Fe and Al comprised 90 and 80% of the PM10 metals in urban and rural areas respectively. As briefly mentioned mainly earth crust elements /metals were detected in previous studies [41, 46, 55]. Additionally, numerous studies have demonstrated that the emission of Cu is from the brake wear, which is mostly from heavy-duty vehicles, and that tire wear is the main source of Zn emission [34, 56]. Some animal husbandry systems use a copper bath for the fungal treatment of cows, which may enter the soil [22].

In the present study, the concentrations of Ni and V were 12.1 and 7.03 ng m−3 for urban area and 5.85 and 2.72 ng m−3 for rural area. V and Ni are mainly derived from the marine vessels and oil combustion [57]. The IARC [58] has identified Pb, Ni, Cd, and As as carcinogenic for humans (Group 1) [59]. According to the European commission standards for the ambient air limits of Cd (5 ng m−3), Ni (20 ng m−3), As (6 ng m−3) and Pb (500 ng m−3). The values of Pb and Ni were below the limit, but those of Cd and As were above the limit in urban and rural areas, respectively. For As concentration, a significant difference (Pvalue ≤ 0.05) between urban and rural location was observed. The higher levels of arsenic in the rural areas than the urban ones might be due to the greater use of arsenic-based pesticides since the major part of activity in the studied rural area was in the agricultural lands. Several studies have shown that Sb, S, Cd, Mo, Zn, Pb, and Cu originate from vehicle emissions [29, 60].

The amount of Pb was less than the national ambient air quality standards in Iran (500 ng m−3). The main reason for this could be the removal of Pb from the consumed fuels in Iran since 2002, which significantly reduced this element in Tehran air [41]. In this study, based on previous studies [34, 41, 61, 62] and the presence of metals, four possible source categories were identified on dusty, inversion, and regular days, crustal elements (Al, Si, Fe,Ti), vehicular emissions (Ba,Mo,Cu,Mn,Zn,As,Cd), industrial (V, Ni, Cr, Pb) and other sources (Li, Se, Sn, Sr, Co).

As shown in Fig. 3, regardless of the sampling site, the concentration of crustal metals was higher on dusty days. Considering the elements with crustal origins, it was found that the sum of these elements was greater in rural areas than in urban ones, which may be due to the limited anthropogenic emissions in the rural areas. The highest values of vehicular and industrial tracer elements occurred on inversion days, especially in urban areas, due to their more stable atmospheric conditions and a lower inversion layer, leading to substantially higher levels of pollutants on inversion days.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The contribution of different metals to the total metal mass in PM10 on dusty, inversion and regular days at urban location (a) and rural location (b)

PAHs

The statistical summary including the mean and standard deviation of concentrations of PAHs measured at two sampling points are given in Table S2 (Supplementary material). Among the different species, the highest and lowest concentrations were related to Phen and DahA (23.2 and 1.23 ng m−3) and Phen and Acy (4.4 and 1.58 ng m−3), respectively, in urban and rural areas. The results demonstrated that the concentrations of PAHs associated with PM10 were lower than the earlier studies in Tehran. The results of Hassanvand [46] concerning the concentration of PAHs compounds associated with PM10 on PTFE filters using low volume samplers during one year (2012–2013) in Tehran showed that the concentration of these compounds varied from 425 to 430 ng m−3 at different sampling points. Difference between previously reported PAH concentrations and results from this study may be due to difference in climatic conditions, sampling methods, sampling season and filter type, which can cause a difference in the reported concentrations. Some studies have been shown that fiberglass filters may be absorbing some PAH vapours while PTFE filters are not absorbing those [63, 64].

According to the results, the highest total concentration of PAHs compounds was 127 ng m−3 on the inversion days in urban areas, which can be due to the lower inversion layer, leading to a decrease in the distribution of pollutants, including these compounds. Figure 4 shows the percentage of components of PAHs based on the number of aromatic rings including 2-ring PAHs (Nap); 3-ring PAHs (Ace, Acy, Flu, Phen, and Anth);4-ring PAHs (Flt, Pyr, BaA, and Chr); 5-ring PAHs (BbF, BkF, BaP, and DahA); and 6-ring PAHs (BghiP and Ind) [65] in Tehran during the sampling period. As shown in Fig. 4, regardless of the sampling site, more than 50% of the PAHs compounds had 4, 5 and 6 rings with high molecular weight.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Ring-wise (two, three, four, five and six-ring) distribution of PAHs in PM10 at urban and rural locations

The results showed that 3 and 4-ring compounds dominated the PAHs compounds in Tehran whereas 2-ring compounds with low molecular weight had the lowest values and were mostly found in the gas phase [47]. The presence of compounds with high molecular weight such as BkF, BkF, DahA and Ind in PM10 was mainly associated with the use of fossil fuels and vehicles. Similar results have been reported in previous studies [46]. The overall mean of the seven carcinogenic PAHs compounds including BaA, Chr, BbF, BkF, BaP, DahA, and Ind was 36.2 ± 16.3 and 7.99 ± 5.64 ng m−3 in PM10 in urban and rural areas, respectively. Among these seven species of carcinogens, the highest concentration belonged to Chr with means of 11.9 and 2.83 ng m−3, and the lowest belonged to DahA and Ind with means of 1.23 ng m−3 and 0.60 ng m−3 in urban and rural areas, respectively. The concentration of total PAHs in autumn was higher than in spring (Pvalue ≤ 0.05) due to the more stable weather conditions. In addition, the lower concentration of PAHs in the warm season is due to the enhanced photochemical degradation of PAHs [66]. Among the different types of PAHs compounds, there is only an annual average national standard of 1 ng m−3 for BaP. Because of its carcinogenic potential, BaP is often used as an indicator for assessing exposure to PAHs compounds. In this study, the average concentration of BaP was 6.15 ± 1.75 and 1.45 ± 0.80 ng m−3 in the urban and rural area respectively. The percentiles of BaP concentrations in urban and rural locations are given in Fig. S3 (Supplementary material). Accordingly, the BaP concentration exceeded the national standard in 100% of the cases in the urban areas and in 73% of the cases in the rural areas.

Oxidative potential

In Table 2, the OP statistical summary of PM10 is given at two sampling locations in three different meteorological phenomena (dusty, inversion, and regular days) with two extraction solvents of water and methanol. As indicated in the Table 2, the amount of OPDTTv was lowest on dusty days (OPDTTv-water of 1.35 ± 0.4 and 1.26 ± 0.4 nmol min−1 m−3 in urban and rural locations, respectively). This is most likely because of the high level of soil-based compounds, most of which are not redox active. OP was at its lowest value, despite the increased concentration of PM, which indicates that OP is PM mass independent and an important proxy alongside PM mass in air pollution monitoring [67].

Table 2.

Average of DTT Activity (nmol DTT/m3, (nmol min−1 μgPM10−1) of PM10 (methanol and water extraction) in Dusty, Inversion and regular days at sampling Locations

Location DTT activity Dusty days Inversion days Regular days All days
Water Met Water Met Water Met Water Met
Urban area OPDTTm
(nmol min−1 μgPM10−1)
21.31 ± 9.7 12.86.38 20.1 ± 5.43 12.3 ± 3.21 41.5 ± 5.12 27.6 ± 5.31 15.6 ± 4.19 6.73 ± 2.53
OPDTTv
(nmol min −1 m−3)
4.04 ± 2.63 1.52 ± 0.41 3.86 ± 1.08 1.53 ± 0.36 6.49 ± 1.76 1.79 ± 0.76 3.42 ± 0.89 1.35 ± 0.37
Rural area OPDTTm
(nmol min−1 μgPM10−1)
21.3 ± 10.7 12.1 ± 6.22 22.2 ± 5.70 12.1 ± 4.72 33.1 ± 7.01 21. 6 ± 5.39 10.81 ± 4.39 7.10 ± 1.11
OPDTTv
(nmol min −1 m−3)
3.23 ± 2.25 1.47 ± 0.38 3.27 ± 0.85 1.44 ± 0.34 3.82 ± 1.05 2.03 ± 0.20 2.71 ± 0.57 1.26 ± 0.36

Met = Methanol

OPDTTv of the PM10 was higher on inversion days 1.79 ± 0.76 and 2.03 ± 0.2 nmol min−1 m−3 at urban and rural locations, respectively than on other days. The higher OP activity in the cold seasons (inversion days) than the warm ones (dusty days) indicated the oxidative activity and formation of secondary organic aerosol during the transport or aging of particles in the atmosphere. The differences in particle OP in different seasons could be associated with changes in PM chemical compounds. Earlier studies have also demonstrated that seasonal variations can change the OP of PM [68].

Figure 5 shows the ratio of the OP for urban area to rural area. According to the results of this study, no significant difference was found between the OP in the urban and rural areas (Pvalue > 0.05). In the studied rural area, large areas of agricultural lands that may affect the compounds that are redox active due to the use of pesticides. The results of this study (as mention in section 4.2.2) showed that the amount of arsenic in the PM was greater in the rural areas than in the urban environment. The results of this study showed that the choice of extraction solvent affects DTT activity (pvalue ≤ .05). Therefore, OPDTT with methanol extract produced greater DTT activity than did that with the water extract. The results of this study are in line with previously reported data [26, 69].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Ratio of the oxidative potential (OP) for urban area to rural area

In this study, the relationship between DTT activity and concentration of metals, PAHs, water soluble ions was investigated to determine which affected the DTT activity. Table 3 shows the correlation coefficient between DTT consumption and concentration of chemical compounds. The results showed a strong relationship between vehicular tracers such as Cu, Mn and OP as well as a moderate relationship among Ba, Cd, Ba, Ni, V, Fe and OP. These results are in line with other studies. [16, 31, 70, 71]. These result indicating vehicular emissions which the main sources of chemical compound of PM in Tehran, may be the important supporters of OP. DTT oxidation is performed by metals via catalytic processes [31]. Cu and Fe can produce OH°- via Fenton reactions [19]. The redox active compounds have unconjugated electrons in the d-orbital that can produce free radicals through the redox cycling mechanisms with biological reductants [1]. DTT oxidation by Fe is low, but due to the abundance of Fe, it is usually important in DTT oxidation. Moreover, non-redox active metals such as Zn and Al can affect the OP of metals by exacerbating or lessening free radical production. The mineral compounds were not significantly associated with OP, which was consistent with the study by Hu et al. [29]. Sulfate may have a proxy for the bioavaibility of metals because it can mobilize the dissolved Fe from the surface of the particle by influencing the acidity of the PM [17].

Table 3.

Spearman correlation between DTT activity, and selected species

Species Urban Rural
DTT activity DTT activity
Water soluble ions R p R p
Na+ −.32 .021 −.47 .02
Cl −.26 .03 −.32 .02
metal(loid)s Fe .43 .04 .35 .03
Cu .83 .01 .68 .00
Ni .51 .04 .47 .03
V .64 .02 .68 .02
Cd .52 .00 .20 .04
Mn .79 .00 .68 .02
PAHs Ba .48 .00 .57 .00
Bap .61 .01 .38 .01
Pyr .36 .04 .32 .04
Total PAHs .56 .02 .41 .01

According to Verma method [48] the PM acidity were calculated using the Eq. S3 (see Eq. S3, Supplementary material). Regardless sampling locations, the results showed that PM on inversion days was approximately twice higher acidic compared to regular days, and also the figure for dusty days had the highest acidity value at around 0.5. Thus more acidic conditions during inversion days may be is a leading cause of metal dissolution and consequently high OP of PM10. These results are consistent with previously studies [48, 52, 53]. The inverse relationship between Na+ and Cl and the formation of OH showed that it is a surrogate for other metals. In the case of large amounts of particles such as Na+ and Cl, there was an inverse relationship with OP through a competition with more redox active compounds [16]. PAHs are important as a marker of sources of organic compounds.

A strong correlation was found between DTT activity and BaP concentration and moderate correlation between DTT activity and total PAHs, Pyr. According to the high concentrations of BaP in present study, it may be one of the major participants of OP in Tehran. BaP is a tracer of fuel emission from vehicles, particularly diesel fuel vehicles. Although some compounds of PAHs are not redox active, they may be oxidized to redox active compounds such as quinones and nitro PAHs, which also oxidize DTT [36, 71].

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that compares OP of PM10 in various meteorological phenomena, including dusty and inversion days in Tehran. In this study, we used DTT assay to measure OP, which may indicate the ability of PM10 to produce oxidative stress. The results showed that the mass concentrations of PM10 in Tehran were 100 and 95% above the WHO guidelines in urban and rural areas respectively. The crustal tracer elements (Na+,Mg2+, and Ca2+) had the highest amounts on dusty days and the lowest amounts on inversion days. The total amount of Mo, Zn, Pb, Ba, Ni, V, Cd, Pb and Cu as anthropogenic elements was higher in urban areas than in rural ones. The results show, the highest contribution of PAHs was related to the 3 and 4-ring compounds. The minimum amount of OP (nm DTT μg −1 PM10−1) was observed on dusty days. Cu, Ba, Cd, Mn, Ni, V, Fe, total PAHs, Bap and Pyr were significantly related to OP, showing that the main sources of pollution affecting the OP of PM in Tehran are the vehicles. In summary, the results of this study support earlier studies that OP beside PM mass concentration is a good proxy for air quality monitoring. We hope OP measurement in the air quality monitoring networks could be routinely performed.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1 (4.1MB, doc)

(DOC 4.14 mb)

Acknowledgements

This research was part of a funded PhD thesis of Soheila Rezaei, a student of Tehran University of Medical Sciences(TUMS), and the financial support of this study (ETRC- 9330) was Provided by Institute for Environmental Research (IER) of Tehran University of Medical Sciences under grant no. 94-04-46-30800 and Iranian National Science Foundation(INSF) under grant no.95831321.

References

  • 1.Kelly FJ, Fussell JC. Size, source and chemical composition as determinants of toxicity attributable to ambient particulate matter. Atmos Environ. 2012;60:504–526. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Neff JC, Reynolds RL, Munson SM, Fernandez D, Belnap J. The role of dust storms in total atmospheric particle concentrations at two sites in the western US. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 2013;118(19)
  • 3.Jugder D, Shinoda M, Sugimoto N, Matsui I, Nishikawa M, Park S-U, et al. Spatial and temporal variations of dust concentrations in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia. Glob Planet Chang. 2011;78(1-2):14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lei H, Wang J. Observed characteristics of dust storm events over the western United States using meteorological, satellite, and air quality measurements. Atmos Chem Phys. 2014;14(15):7847–7857. doi: 10.5194/acp-14-7847-2014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jayaratne E, Johnson GR, McGarry P, Cheung HC, Morawska L. Characteristics of airborne ultrafine and coarse particles during the Australian dust storm of 23 September 2009. Atmos Environ. 2011;45(24):3996–4001. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hassanvand MS, Naddafi K, Faridi S, Arhami M, Nabizadeh R, Sowlat MH, et al. Indoor/outdoor relationships of PM 10, PM 2.5, and PM 1 mass concentrations and their water-soluble ions in a retirement home and a school dormitory. Atmos Environ. 2014;82:375–382. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang S, Yuan W, Shang K. The impacts of different kinds of dust events on PM 10 pollution in northern China. Atmos Environ. 2006;40(40):7975–7982. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Achilleos S, Evans JS, Yiallouros PK, Kleanthous S, Schwartz J, Koutrakis P. PM10 concentration levels at an urban and background site in Cyprus: the impact of urban sources and dust storms. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2014;64(12):1352–1360. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2014.923061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Querol X, Pey J, Pandolfi M, Alastuey A, Cusack M, Pérez N, et al. African dust contributions to mean ambient PM 10 mass-levels across the Mediterranean Basin. Atmos Environ. 2009;43(28):4266–4277. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Valavanidis A, Fiotakis K, Vlachogianni T. Airborne particulate matter and human health: toxicological assessment and importance of size and composition of particles for oxidative damage and carcinogenic mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C. 2008;26(4):339–362. doi: 10.1080/10590500802494538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Møller P, Danielsen PH, Karottki DG, Jantzen K, Roursgaard M, Klingberg H, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammation generated DNA damage by exposure to air pollution particles. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research. 2014;762:133–166. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2014.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Delfino RJ, Staimer N, Tjoa T, Gillen DL, Schauer JJ, Shafer MM. Airway inflammation and oxidative potential of air pollutant particles in a pediatric asthma panel. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology. 2013;23(5):466–473. doi: 10.1038/jes.2013.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Halonen JI, Lanki T, Yli-Tuomi T, Kulmala M, Tiittanen P, Pekkanen J. Urban air pollution, and asthma and COPD hospital emergency room visits. Thorax. 2008;63:635–641. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.091371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meng YY, Rull RP, Wilhelm M, Lombardi C, Balmes J, Ritz B. Outdoor air pollution and uncontrolled asthma in the San Joaquin Valley, California. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64:142–147. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.083576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hassanvand MS, Naddafi K, Kashani H, Faridi S, Kunzli N, Nabizadeh R, et al. Short-term effects of particle size fractions on circulating biomarkers of inflammation in a panel of elderly subjects and healthy young adults. Environ Pollut. 2017;223:695–704. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nawrot TS, Kuenzli N, Sunyer J, Shi T, Moreno T, Viana M, et al. Oxidative properties of ambient PM2.5 and elemental composition: heterogeneous associations in 19 European cities. Atmos Environ. 2009;43(30):4595–4602. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Künzli N, Mudway IS, Götschi T, Shi T, Kelly FJ, Cook S, et al. Comparison of oxidative properties, light absorbance, and total and elemental mass concentration of ambient PM 2.5 collected at 20 European sites. Environ Health Perspect. 2006:684–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.De Vizcaya-Ruiz A, Gutiérrez-Castillo ME, Uribe-Ramirez M, Cebrián ME, Mugica-Alvarez V, Sepúlveda J, et al. Characterization and in vitro biological effects of concentrated particulate matter from Mexico City. Atmos Environ. 2006;40(Supplement 2):583–592. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hellack B, Quass U, Nickel C, Wick G, Schins RPF, Kuhlbusch TAJ. Oxidative potential of particulate matter at a German motorway. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2015;17(4):868–876. doi: 10.1039/c4em00605d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Daher N, Saliba NA, Shihadeh AL, Jaafar M, Baalbaki R, Shafer MM, et al. Oxidative potential and chemical speciation of size-resolved particulate matter (PM) at near-freeway and urban background sites in the greater Beirut area. Sci Total Environ. 470-471:417–26. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.Calas A, Uzu G, Martins JM, Voisin D, Spadini L, Lacroix T, et al. The importance of simulated lung fluid (SLF) extractions for a more relevant evaluation of the oxidative potential of particulate matter. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11617. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11979-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Charrier JG, Richards-Henderson NK, Bein KJ, McFall AS, Wexler AS, Anastasio C. Oxidant production from source-oriented particulate matter – Part 1: oxidative potential using the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay. Atmos Chem Phys. 2015;15(5):2327–2340. doi: 10.5194/acp-15-2327-2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Janssen NAH, Yang A, Strak M, Steenhof M, Hellack B, Gerlofs-Nijland ME, et al. Oxidative potential of particulate matter collected at sites with different source characteristics. Sci Total Environ. 2014;472:572–581. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Crobeddu B, Aragao-Santiago L, Bui L-C, Boland S, Squiban AB. Oxidative potential of particulate matter 2.5 as predictive indicator of cellular stress. Environ Pollut. 2017;230:125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ma Y, Cheng Y, Qiu X, Cao G, Fang Y, Wang J, et al. Sources and oxidative potential of water-soluble humic-like substances (HULISWS) in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in Beijing. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss. 2017;2017:1–14. doi: 10.5194/acp-2017-740. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang A, Jedynska A, Hellack B, Kooter I, Hoek G, Brunekreef B, et al. Measurement of the oxidative potential of PM2.5 and its constituents: The effect of extraction solvent and filter type. Atmos Environ. 2014;83:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fang T, Verma V, Guo H, King L, Edgerton E, Weber R. A semi-automated system for quantifying the oxidative potential of ambient particles in aqueous extracts using the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay: results from the Southeastern Center for Air Pollution and Epidemiology (SCAPE). Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions. 2014;7(7)
  • 28.Sauvain J-J, Rossi MJ, Riediker M. Comparison of Three Acellular Tests for Assessing the Oxidation Potential of Nanomaterials. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2013;47(2):218–227. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2012.742951. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hu S, Polidori A, Arhami M, Shafer MM, Schauer JJ, Cho A, et al. Redox activity and chemical speciation of size fractioned PM in the communities of the Los Angeles-Long Beach harbor. Atmos Chem Phys. 2008;8(21):6439–6451. doi: 10.5194/acp-8-6439-2008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boogaard H, Janssen NAH, Fischer PH, Kos GPA, Weijers EP, Cassee FR, et al. Contrasts in Oxidative Potential and Other Participate Matter Characteristics Collected Near Major Streets and Background Locations. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(2):185–191. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Charrier J, Anastasio C. On dithiothreitol (DTT) as a measure of oxidative potential for ambient particles: evidence for the importance of soluble transition metals. Atmospheric chemistry and physics (Print) 2012;12(5):11317. doi: 10.5194/acpd-12-11317-2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sameenoi Y, Koehler K, Shapiro J, Boonsong K, Yele Sun JC Jr, et al. Microfluidic Electrochemical Sensor for On-line Monitoring of Aerosol Oxidative Activity. J Am Chem Soc. 2012:10562–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Fang T, Verma V, Guo H, King LE, Edgerton ES, Weber RJ. A semi-automated system for quantifying the oxidative potential of ambient particles in aqueous extracts using the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay: results from the Southeastern Center for Air Pollution and Epidemiology (SCAPE) Atmos Meas Tech. 2015;8(1):471–482. doi: 10.5194/amt-8-471-2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shirmohammadi F, Hasheminassab S, Wang D, Saffari A, Schauer JJ, Shafer MM, et al. Oxidative potential of coarse particulate matter (PM10-2.5) and its relation to water solubility and sources of trace elements and metals in the Los Angeles Basin. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2015;17(12):2110–2121. doi: 10.1039/c5em00364d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Borm PJA, Kelly F, Künzli N, Schins RPF, Donaldson K. Oxidant generation by particulate matter: from biologically effective dose to a promising, novel metric. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(2):73–74. doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.029090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cho AK, Sioutas C, Miguel AH, Kumagai Y, Schmitz DA, Singh M, et al. Redox activity of airborne particulate matter at different sites in the Los Angeles Basin. Environ Res. 2005;99(1):40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2005.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li N, Sioutas C, Cho A, Schmitz D, Misra C, Sempf J, et al. Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(4):455. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shirmohammadi F, Hasheminassab S, Wang D, Saffari A, Schauer JJ, Shafer MM, et al. Oxidative potential of coarse particulate matter (PM 10–2.5) and its relation to water solubility and sources of trace elements and metals in the Los Angeles Basin. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 2015;17(12):2110–2121. doi: 10.1039/c5em00364d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Naddafi K, Hassanvand MS, Yunesian M, Momeniha F, Nabizadeh R, Faridi S, et al. Health impact assessment of air pollution in megacity of Tehran, Iran. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering. 2012;9(1):28. doi: 10.1186/1735-2746-9-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.World Health Organization (WHO). Ambient air pollution: a global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. Geneva: WHO Document Production Services; 2016.
  • 41.Arhami M, Hosseini V, Shahne MZ, Bigdeli M, Lai A, Schauer JJ. Seasonal trends, chemical speciation and source apportionment of fine PM in Tehran. Atmos Environ. 2017;153:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.12.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kazem Naddafi ZA, Faraji M, Ghanbarian M, Rezaei S, Ghozikali MG, Hassanvand MS, Pourpak Z, Mesdaghinia A, Yunesian M, Yaghmaeian K, Nodehi RN, Nicknam MH, Zamanzadeh M, Shamsipour M, Ansarin K. Health effects of airborne particulate matters (pm10) during dust storm and non-dust storm conditions in tehran. Journal of Air Pollution and Health. 2016;1(4):259–268. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.EC Working Group on Particulate Matter. European commission report, “guidance to member stateson PM10 monitoring and inter-comparisons with the reference method”. 2002.
  • 44.Naimabadi A, Ghadiri A, Idani E, Babaei AA, Alavi N, Shirmardi M, et al. Chemical composition of PM 10 and its in vitro toxicological impacts on lung cells during the Middle Eastern Dust (MED) storms in Ahvaz, Iran. Environ Pollut. 2016;211:316–324. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pateraki S, Asimakopoulos DN, Flocas HA, Maggos T, Vasilakos C. The role of meteorology on different sized aerosol fractions (PM10, PM2.5, PM2.5–10) Sci Total Environ. 2012;419:124–135. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hassanvand MS, Naddafi K, Faridi S, Nabizadeh R, Sowlat MH, Momeniha F, et al. Characterization of PAHs and metals in indoor/outdoor PM 10/PM 2.5/PM 1 in a retirement home and a school dormitory. Sci Total Environ. 2015;527:100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hoseini M, Yunesian M, Nabizadeh R, Yaghmaeian K, Ahmadkhaniha R, Rastkari N, et al. Characterization and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban atmospheric particulate of Tehran, Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23(2):1820–1832. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5355-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Verma V, Ning Z, Cho AK, Schauer JJ, Shafer MM, Sioutas C. Redox activity of urban quasi-ultrafine particles from primary and secondary sources. Atmos Environ. 2009;43(40):6360–6368. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Givehchi R, Arhami M, Tajrishy M. Contribution of the Middle Eastern dust source areas to PM 10 levels in urban receptors: case study of Tehran, Iran. Atmos Environ. 2013;75:287–295. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Huang T, Chen J, Zhao W, Cheng J, Cheng S. Seasonal variations and correlation analysis of water-soluble inorganic ions in PM2. 5 in Wuhan, 2013. Atmosphere. 2016;7(4):49. doi: 10.3390/atmos7040049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dao X, Wang Z, Lv Y, Teng E, Zhang L, Wang C. Chemical characteristics of water-soluble ions in particulate matter in three metropolitan areas in the north China plain. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e113831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fang T, Guo H, Zeng L, Verma V, Nenes A, aRJ W. Highly acidic ambient particles, soluble metals, and oxidative potential: a link between sulfate and aerosol toxicity. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:2611–20. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 53.Wang Y, Zhuang G, Sun Y, An Z. The variation of characteristics and formation mechanisms of aerosols in dust, haze, and clear days in Beijing. Atmos Environ. 2006;40(34):6579–6591. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lough GC, Schauer JJ, Park J-S, Shafer MM, DeMinter JT, Weinstein JP. Emissions of metals associated with motor vehicle roadways. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(3):826–836. doi: 10.1021/es048715f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.MohseniBandpi A, Eslami A, Shahsavani A, Khodagholi F, Alinejad A. Physicochemical characterization of ambient PM 2.5 in Tehran air and its potential cytotoxicity in human lung epithelial cells (A549) Sci Total Environ. 2017;593:182–190. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Godri KJ, Duggan ST, Fuller GW, Baker T, Green D, Kelly FJ, et al. Particulate matter oxidative potential from waste transfer station activity. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(4):493. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Isakson J, Persson TA, Selin Lindgren E. Identification and assessment of ship emissions and their effects in the harbour of Goteborg, Sweden. Atmos Environ. 2001;35:659–3666. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00528-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.IARC Working Group on the. Evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans a review of human carcinogens. Lyon: Part C: arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts; 2012. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 59.World Health Organization (WHO). Air quality guidlines for Europe. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: WHO regional publications, European series, No. 91; 2000. [PubMed]
  • 60.Sauvain J-J, Deslarzes S, Storti F, Riediker M. Oxidative potential of particles in different occupational environments: A pilot study. Ann Occup Hyg. 2015;59(7):882–894. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mirowsky JE, Jin L, Thurston G, Lighthall D, Tyner T, Horton L, et al. In vitro and in vivo toxicity of urban and rural particulate matter from California. Atmos Environ. 2015;103:256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Pranav Kulkarni SC, James B, Flanagan RKMJ. Microwave digestion—ICP-MS for elemental analysis in ambient airborne fine particulate matter: Rare earth elements and validation using a filter borne fine particle certified reference material. Anal Chim Acta. 2007;599:170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Grosjean D. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in los angeles air from samples collected on teflon,glass and quartz filters. Atmospheric Enwronmmr. 1983;17(12):2565–2573. doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(83)90084-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Davis CS, Fellin P, Otson R. A review of sampling methods for polyaromatic hydrocarbons in air. JAPCA. 1987;37(12):1397–408. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 65.Kim K-H, Jahan SA, Kabir E, Brown RJ. Review of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their human health effects. Environ Int. 2013;60:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang WSS, Giri B, Chang Y, Zhang Y, Jia Y, Tao S, Wang R, Wang BLW. Atmospheric concentrations and air–soil gas exchange of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in remote,rural village and urban areas of Beijing–Tianjin region, North China. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409:2942–2950. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fang T, Verma V, Bates JT, Abrams J, Klein M, Strickland MJ, et al. Oxidative potential of ambient water-soluble PM2.5 in the southeastern United States: contrasts in sources and health associations between ascorbic acid (AA) and dithiothreitol (DTT) assays. Atmos Chem Phys. 2016;16(6):3865–3879. doi: 10.5194/acp-16-3865-2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cheung KSM, Schauer JJ, Sioutas C. Diurnal trends in oxidative potential of coarse particulate matter in the los angeles basin and their relation to sources and chemical composition. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:3779–3787. doi: 10.1021/es204211v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Verma V, Rico-Martinez R, Kotra N, King L, Liu J, Snell TW, Weber RJ. Contribution of water-soluble and insoluble components and their hydrophobic/hydrophilic subfractions to the reactive oxygen species-generating potential of fine ambient aerosols. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:11384–11392. doi: 10.1021/es302484r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Eiguren-Fernandez A, Shinyashiki M, Schmitz DA, DiStefano E, Hinds W, Kumagai Y, Cho AK, Froines JR. Redox and electrophilic properties of vapor- and particle-phase components of ambient aerosols. Environ Res. 2010;110:207–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 71.Ntziachristos L, Froines JR, Cho AK, Sioutas C. Relationship between redox activity and chemical speciation of size-fractionated particulate matter. Particle and Fibre Toxicology. 2007;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-4-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESM 1 (4.1MB, doc)

(DOC 4.14 mb)


Articles from Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES