Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2018 Nov 27;9:2949. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02949

Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β Enhances Hepatitis C Virus Replication by Supporting miR-122

Maged Saleh 1, Sabrina Rüschenbaum 1, Christoph Welsch 1, Stefan Zeuzem 1, Darius Moradpour 2, Jérôme Gouttenoire 2, Christian M Lange 1,*
PMCID: PMC6278592  PMID: 30542341

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with alterations in host lipid and insulin signaling cascades, which are partially explained by a dependence of the HCV life cycle on key molecules in these metabolic pathways. Yet, little is known on the role in the HCV life cycle of glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3), one of the most important kinases in cellular metabolism. Therefore, the impact of GSK3 on the HCV life cycle was assessed in human hepatoma cell lines harboring subgenomic genotype 1b and 2a replicons or producing cell culture-derived HCV genotype 2a by exposure to synthetic GSK3 inhibitors, GSK3 gene silencing, overexpression of GSK3 constructs and immunofluorescence analyses. In addition, the role of GSK3 in hepatitis E virus (HEV) replication was investigated to assess virus specificity of the observed findings. We found that both inhibition of GSK3 function by synthetic inhibitors as well as silencing of GSK3β gene expression resulted in a decrease of HCV replication and infectious particle production, whereas silencing of the GSK3α isoform had no relevant effect on the HCV life cycle. Conversely, overexpression of GSK3β resulted in enhanced HCV replication. In contrast, GSK3β had no effect on replication of subgenomic HEV replicon. The pro-viral effect of GSK3β on HCV replication was mediated by supporting expression of microRNA-122 (miR-122), a micro-RNA which is mandatory for wild-type HCV replication, as GSK3 inhibitors suppressed miR-122 levels and as inhibitors of GSK3 had no antiviral effect on a miR-122-independent HCV mutant. In conclusion, we have identified GSK3β is a novel host factor supporting HCV replication by maintaining high levels of hepatic miR-122 expression.

Keywords: GSK3α, GSK3β, hepatitis E virus, host-targeting antivirals, insulin resistance, miR-122

Introduction

Hepatitis C virus is a member of the Flaviviridae family which has a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome (Lange et al., 2014b). The HCV genome encodes the viral structural and non-structural proteins, which are required for the HCV life cycle (Lange et al., 2014b). In addition to HCV proteins, a number of host factors have been discovered on which HCV critically depends (Lange et al., 2014b). Though most of these host factors are cellular proteins, a liver-specific micro-RNA (miR-122) has been identified which is mandatory for HCV replication and which is (at least partially) responsible for the hepatotropism of this virus (Lange et al., 2014b).

Chronic infection with HCV is not only a major cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, but also associated with metabolic traits including insulin resistance and dyslipidemia (Kawaguchi et al., 2004; Shintani et al., 2004; Bose et al., 2012). While the effects of HCV infection on glucose metabolism are clearly documented in vivo and in vitro, the benefit of these alterations for the virus remains largely unclear (Petta et al., 2010; Negro, 2014), although insulin resistance was identified as a negative predictor of outcome of interferon-based therapies (Romero-Gómez et al., 2005; Dai et al., 2009; Grasso et al., 2009; Moucari et al., 2009; Khattab et al., 2010; Fattovich et al., 2011).

Gglycogen synthase kinase 3 is a serine/threonine protein kinase that exists in two isoforms, GSK3α and GSK3β, which are encoded by two different genes. Approximately 100 substrates of GSK3 have been proposed, highlighting a central role for GSK3 in numerous cellular processes such as proliferation, migration, apoptosis, immune modulation and - importantly - glucose metabolism (Jope et al., 2007). Of note, substrates of GSK3α and GSK3β are overlapping only partially. The activity of GSK3 is modulated by inhibitory phosphorylation at Ser 21 for GSK3α and Ser 9 for GSK3β by upstream kinases, where the phosphorylated N-terminal tail acts as a pseudosubstrate that prevents incoming substrates from entering the catalytic center (Cohen and Frame, 2001).

The importance of GSK3 is further highlighted by its role in the pathogenesis of relevant diseases including diabetes, cancer and inflammation (Beurel et al., 2015). Accordingly, several GSK3 inhibitors are in preclinical and clinical development, for example for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease or diabetes (del Ser et al., 2013; Lovestone et al., 2015). Of note, GSK3 has also been identified as a host factor required for replication of influenza and SARS viruses (Wu et al., 2009; König et al., 2010). Yet, the role of GSK3 in the HCV life cycle remains to be characterized.

In view of the close relationship between HCV infection and metabolic alterations, the present study aimed at investigating a possible role of GSK3 in the HCV life cycle.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture, Subgenomic Replicons, Cell Culture-Derived HCV, Plasmids

Huh-7.5 human hepatoma cell line was provided by Charles M. Rice (The Rockefeller University, New York, NY) and cultured in DMEM (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) containing 10% heat-inactivated FCS. HCV subgenomic replicon construct pCon1/SG-Neo(I)/AflII (Con1 strain, genotype 1b) (Blight et al., 2000) was provided by Charles M. Rice. Full-length HCV construct pFK-JFH1J6C-846_dg (Jc1 virus, genotype 2a) (Pietschmann et al., 2006) was provided by Ralf Bartenschlager (University of Heidelberg, Germany). HCV U3 virus, a genotype 2a full-length strain resistant to miR-122 inhibition was provided by Jens Bukh (University of Copenhagen, Denmark) (Li et al., 2011). Huh-7.5 cells were electroporated with in vitro transcribed full-length HCV RNA and 72 h later the virus infectivity in the supernatant was assessed by foci forming unit (ffu) determination using anti-HCV core monoclonal antibody (mAb) C7-50 (Moradpour et al., 1996), as described (Zhong et al., 2005). The S10-3 cell line harboring a HEV genotype 3 replicon derived from Kernow-C1 p6 strain (provided by Suzanne U. Emerson (National Institutes of Health, MD) was used as previously described (Dao Thi et al., 2016). Sofosbuvir (Alsachim SAS, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France), HCV NS5B inhibitor, was resolved in DMSO and used at a final concentration of 1 μM. GSK3 inhibitors lithium chloride (LiCl) and CHIR99021 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) were resolved in sterile water and DMSO, respectively. Cytotoxicity was assessed using the WST-1 assay (Sigma-Aldrich).

Haemagglutinin-tagged GSK3β wild-type plasmid (HA-GSK3β wt pcDNA3) was a gift from Jim Woodgett (Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada) (Addgene plasmid #14753) (He et al., 1995). Transfection of GSK3 constructs for overexpression was performed with a final DNA concentration of 0.75 μg/ml using X-tremeGENE HP DNA transfection reagent (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).

Immunoblot Analysis

Immunoblotting was performed as described previously (Lange et al., 2014a). Antibodies against total GSK3 α/β (5676S), phosphorylated-GSK3 α/β (Ser9/21) (9331S), and β-catenin (9562S) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technologies (Danvers, MA, United States). Mouse MAb 9E10 against HCV NS5A was provided by Charles M. Rice (Lindenbach, 2005) and mAb 12B7 against HCV NS5B was described earlier (Moradpour et al., 2002). ECL donkey HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit (NA934V) and HRP-conjugated anti-mouse (sc-2031) secondary antibodies were from GE Healthcare (Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, United States), respectively.

Reverse Transcription and Quantitative PCR

Total RNA extraction was done using RNeasy Mini Kits and miRNeasy Mini Kit for mRNA and micro-RNAs, respectively (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Reverse transcription of mRNA and micro-RNA was performed using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) and the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States), respectively.

For real-time PCR, StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) was used. For HCV and GAPDH, experiments were carried out using TaqMan Gene Expression master mix (Applied Biosystems). For micro-RNAs, TaqMan Universal Master Mix II (Applied Biosystems) was used for quantification of the miRNA cDNAs. The following primers were used for HCV amplification: forward, 5′-ACGCAGAAAGCGTCTAGCCAT-3′, reverse, 5′-TACTCA CCGGTTCCGCAGA-3′, HCV TaqMan probe, 5′-TCCTGGAGGCTGCACGACACTCA-3′. TaqMan Gene Expression Assay containing the pre-designed primers and TaqMan probe from Applied Biosystems was used for GAPDH. For miR-122 and miR-16, pre-designed primers (Assay ID no. 2245 and 2420, respectively) from Thermo Fisher Scientific were employed. For HEV, the procedure and primers have been previously described (Dao Thi et al., 2016). Results were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT method and shown as fold change compared to control.

Gene Silencing

Gene silencing was performed as described previously (Lange et al., 2014a) using predesigned siRNAs from Life Technologies. Single siRNAs for GSK3α (s6236 and s6237) and β (s6239 and s6240) as well as a non-targeting control siRNA were transfected at a final concentration of 5 nM using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Life Technologies).

Results

Inhibition of GSK3 Kinase Activity Suppresses HCV Replication

CHIR99021 is a highly selective small molecule inhibitor of GSK3α and GSK3β that inhibits GSK3 by competition with ATP in the ATP-binding site of the kinase (Ring et al., 2003; Meijer et al., 2004). To prove efficacy of GSK3 inhibition by CHIR99021, immunoblot analyses of β-catenin, phosphorylated glycogen synthase (GS), and phosphorylated eIF2B 𝜀 as downstream targets of GSK3 were performed. As shown in Figure 1A, β-catenin was upregulated and phosphorylated GS and eIF2B 𝜀 were downregulated by CHIR99021, as expected.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

GSK3 inhibition suppresses HCV replication. (A) Confirmation of GSK3 inhibition by CHIR99021. Immunoblot analysis was carried out for total and phosphorylated-GSK3α/β (Ser 9/21), β-catenin, phosphorylated glycogen synthase (GS), eukaryotic initiation factor 2B𝜀, and β-actin after treatment of Huh-7.5 cells harboring Con1 replicon with 5 μM CHIR99021 for 2, 6, 24 and 48 h, as indicated. (B) Suppression of subgenomic HCV replication by GSK3 inhibition. Huh-7.5 cells harboring Con1 replicon were treated with different concentrations of CHIR99021 for 24 and 48 h. HCV RNA levels normalized to GAPDH mRNA are expressed relative to untreated cells. (C) Assessment of GSK3 inhibitors’ cytotoxicity. WST-1 cytotoxicity assay was carried out for cells stimulated for 24 and 48 h with different concentrations of CHIR99021 at seeding densities of 10,000 and 15,000 cells per well in 96-well plates. Absorbance readings (A450 – A690 nm) of treated cells were compared to negative control cells treated with the dimethyl sulfoxide vehicle. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of six independent experiments. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (∗P-value ≤ 0.05; ∗∗P-value ≤ 0.005; ∗∗∗P-value ≤ 0.0005).

We next exposed Huh-7.5 cells harboring the subgenomic replicon (Con1 strain) to different concentrations of CHIR99021 for 24 and 48 h and quantified HCV RNA by PCR. As shown in Figure 1B, treatment with CHIR99021 led to an inhibition of HCV RNA replication. Of note, no relevant effect on cell viability was observed as a consequence of GSK3 inhibition, as assessed by WST-1 assay (Figure 1C). Comparable results were observed for treatment of Huh-7.5 cells harboring the subgenomic Con1 replicon with lithium chloride, another inhibitor of GSK3 (Beurel et al., 2015) (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Lithium chloride suppresses HCV replication. (A) Immunoblot analysis was carried out for phosphorylated-GSK3α/β (Ser 9/21) after stimulation of Huh-7.5 cells harboring Con1 replicon with 25 mM LiCl for 2 h. β-actin was detected as a loading control. (B) Suppression of subgenomic HCV replication by LiCl. Huh-7.5 cells harboring Con1 replicon were stimulated with LiCl for 24 or 48 h at the indicated concentrations. HCV RNA levels normalized to GAPDH mRNA are expressed relative to untreated cells. (C) Assessment of lithium chloride-induced cytotoxicity. WST-1 cytotoxicity assay was carried out for cells stimulated for 24 and 48 h with LiCl at the indicated concentrations. Absorbance readings (A450 – A690 nm) of treated cells were compared to negative control cells treated with the dimethyl sulfoxide vehicle. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of six independent experiments. (∗∗P-value ≤ 0.005; ∗∗∗, P-value ≤ 0.0005).

Next, Huh-7.5 cells electroporated with full-length HCV genotype 2a Jc1 RNA were treated with CHIR99021 for 72 h to assess the effects of GSK3 inhibition on infectious HCV. As shown in Figure 3A, GSK3 inhibition resulted in a profound inhibition of replication of the infectious HCV clone, as well as of particle production (Figure 3B).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

GSK3β inhibition suppresses full-length HCV replication as well as production of infectious HCV particles. (A) Inhibition of infectious HCV clone Jc1 replication by GSK3 inhibition. Huh-7.5 cells electroporated with HCV Jc1 full-length RNA were treated with 5 μM CHIR99021 for 72 h post-transfection. HCV RNA levels normalized to GAPDH mRNA are expressed relative to untreated cells. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of two experiments performed in triplicate. f.c., fold change. (B) Suppression of HCV infectious particles production by GSK3 inhibition. Virus infectivity was determined by foci forming assay in supernatants from Huh-7.5 cells electroporated with HCV Jc1 RNA and cultured 48 h in the presence of 5 μM CHIR99021. Results were shown as infectivity level normalized to control samples cultured in presence of 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide vehicle. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (∗∗P-value ≤ 0.005; ∗∗∗P-value ≤ 0.0005).

GSK3β, but Not GSK3α, Is Required for the HCV Life Cycle

To assess whether both GSK3 isoforms are required for HCV replication, we silenced GSK3α and / or GSK3β gene expression by transfecting siRNAs and quantified HCV RNA in Huh-7.5 cells harboring HCV subgenomic replicon (Con1) or infectious HCV (Jc1). As shown in Figure 4A (upper panel), silencing of GSK3β gene expression resulted in a substantial decrease of HCV RNA levels of both the subgenomic replicon and the full-length HCV construct, whereas silencing of GSK3α gene expression had only a minor effect on HCV replication. Comparable results were observed for a second set of siRNAs directed against GSK3α or GSK3β (Supplementary Figure 1). The suppressive effect of GSK3β gene silencing on HCV replication was further confirmed on the protein level by quantifying HCV NS5B protein (Figure 4A lower panel). Furthermore, the enhancing effect of GSK3β on HCV RNA replication was confirmed by overexpression of a functional GSK3β construct, which increased HCV RNA replication (Figure 4B).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

GSK3β is required for HCV replication, not GSK3α. (A) GSK3β silencing suppresses HCV replication. Huh-7.5 cells harboring subgenomic Con1 replicon (left panel) or replicating the full-length Jc1 clone were transfected with siRNAs of GSK3α (siRNA #6236), β (siRNA #6239) or both for 72 h. HCV RNA levels normalized to GAPDH mRNA are expressed relative to untreated cells. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of two experiments performed in triplicate. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (∗P-value ≤ 0.05; ∗∗P-value ≤ 0.005; ∗∗∗P-value ≤ 0.0005). Immunoblot analysis was carried out for GSK3α/β to confirm gene silencing efficiency, and for HCV NS5B to assess suppression of HCV replication on the protein level (A, lower panel). β-actin was detected as a loading control. NS5B signal intensities were normalized to β-actin for quantification and were presented as mean ± SEM of signal intensities of duplicate bands. (B) GSK3β overexpression promotes HCV expression. Huh-7.5 cells harboring Con1 replicon were transfected with pcDNA3 plasmid expressing HA-tagged wild-type GSK3β (HA-GSK3β) for 48 and 72 h. Immunoblot analysis was carried out for GSK3α/β to confirm transfection efficiency. The overexpression was confirmed by visualizing HA-GSK3β distinct bands with a slightly higher molecular weight than that of the endogenous GSK3β. HCV NS5B protein was detected to assess HCV replication level and β-actin was detected as a loading control. NS5B signal intensities were normalized to β-actin for quantification and were presented as mean ± SEM of signal intensities of duplicate bands.

The Pro-viral Effects of GSK3β Are Specific for HCV

To test whether the pro-viral effects of GSK3β are specific for HCV, we assessed the impact of GSK3 inhibition on replication of HEV, another hepatotropic positive-strand RNA virus. As shown in Figure 5, neither silencing of GSK3α and / or GSK3β gene expression nor treatment with the GSK3 inhibitor CHIR99021 had a relevant effect on HEV RNA levels, suggesting that the pro-viral effect of GSK3β is specific to HCV.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

The pro-viral effects of GSKβ are limited to HCV in comparison to HEV. No effects of GSK3 inhibition on HEV replication. Huh-7-derived cells (S10-3) harboring a selectable HEV replicon construct (HEV Kernow-C1 strain) were treated with 5 μM CHIR99021 for 48 h or transfected with siRNAs to silence GSK3α and β gene expression for 72 h. HEV RNA levels normalized to GAPDH mRNA are expressed relative to negative control siRNA-transfected cells. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of two experiments performed in triplicate and compared by Wilcoxon M Whitney U-test (n.s., not significant) with the control group.

GSK3β Inhibition Suppresses HCV Replication Through Downregulation of microRNA-122

Given the well-known dependency of HCV on miR-122 (Jopling et al., 2005, 2008; Machlin et al., 2011) and the regulatory circuit between insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, GSK3β, and miR-122 identified previously (Zeng et al., 2010), we assessed the effect of GSK3 inhibition on miR-122 expression in Huh-7.5 cells harboring a subgenomic HCV replicon. As shown in Figure 6A, treatment with CHIR99021 resulted in downregulation of miR-122 levels, in a similar magnitude compared to HCV replication inhibition. For further validation, Huh-7.5 cells transfected with HCV Jc1 or U3 full-length RNA, the latter being a HCV construct replicating independently from miR-122, were treated with CHIR99021. As shown in Figure 6B, CHIR99021 inhibited the replication of the full-length HCV Jc1 genome, the replication of which depends on the presence of miR-122. In contrast, CHIR99021 had no inhibitory effect on replication, nor entry and particle production, of the HCV U3. In line with these observations, the production of Jc1 infectious viral particles was strongly inhibited by CHIR99021 whereas this inhibitor had no effect on infectious particle production of the U3 virus (Figure 6C), suggesting that GSK3β inhibition mainly impacts HCV RNA replication.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Open in a new tab

GSK3 inhibition suppresses HCV by reduces miR-122 expression level. (A) GSK3 inhibition reduces miR-122 expression level. Huh-7.5 cells harboring HCV Con1 replicon were stimulated with 5 μM CHIR99021 for 24 and 48 h. MiR-122 expression level was normalized to miR-16 level as endogenous control. (B) GSK3 inhibition has no effects on miR-122-resistant HCV. Huh-7.5 cells, pre-treated for 24 h with 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 1 μM sofosbuvir (SOF) or 5 μM CHIR99021, were infected with either Jc1 or miR-122-resistant U3 virus (MOI = 0.1) and treated in the same conditions for 72 h before harvesting. HCV RNA levels normalized to GAPDH mRNA level are expressed relative to DMSO-control. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of two experiments performed with six samples each. (C) GSK3 inhibition has no effects on miR-122-resistant HCV infectious particles production. Infectivity was determined by foci forming units (ffu) assay in cell supernatants harvested 72 h post-infection of Jc1 or U3 RNA and treated with either 1 μM SOF or 5 μM CHIR99021. Results were shown as infectivity level normalized to control samples cultured in presence of 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide vehicle. For all experiments, data are presented as mean ± SEM of two experiments performed with six samples each. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (∗P-value ≤ 0.05; ∗∗P-value ≤ 0.005; ∗∗∗P-value ≤ 0.0005).

Discussion

In view of remarkable associations between HCV and metabolic traits, we have investigated the role in the HCV life cycle of GSK3, a key kinase in glucose metabolism and numerous other cellular processes. Our study shows that GSK3β, but not GSK3α, serves as an important host factor of viral RNA replication. The pro-viral effects of GSK3β appeared to be mediated, at least in part, by maintaining hepatocellular levels of the key microRNA miR-122.

MicroRNA-122 is an important microRNA predominantly expressed in hepatocytes, where it accounts for approximately 50–70% of the entire microRNA pool. The high abundancy of miR-122 in liver cells underlines key functions in liver development, growth, differentiation and homeostasis (Bandiera et al., 2015). It is not surprising, therefore, that repression of miR-122 expression promotes the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In addition, miR-122 is involved in important metabolic functions of the liver including cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis and iron homeostasis (Esau et al., 2006; Castoldi et al., 2011). A unique feature of the HCV life cycle is its dependence on the presence of miR-122, which stabilizes the HCV genome and promotes viral replication through binding to the 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR) of the viral genome (Jopling et al., 2005, 2008; Machlin et al., 2011). Given the liver-specific expression of miR-122, this micro-RNA is also considered to be a key determinant of the hepatotropism of HCV. The strong dependence of HCV on miR-122 is evidenced by profound suppression of viral loads by therapeutic silencing of miR-122 in vivo (Lanford et al., 2010; Janssen et al., 2013). Given the tumor suppressor function of miR-122, these therapeutic silencing strategies may be associated with an increased risk of HCC development. In addition, a recent study has shown that HCV functionally regulates (sequesters) miR-122 within hepatocytes, which results in a de-repression of miR-122 target genes in the presence of HCV and which may partially explain the oncogenic potential of chronic hepatitis C (Luna et al., 2015). Our finding that specifically GSK3β (and not GSK3α) is required to maintain miR-122 levels in HCV infected hepatocytes adds another facet to the complex reciprocal relationship between HCV, miR-122 and the implications of chronic HCV infection on metabolic and oncogenic traits. Yet, it is a limitation of our study that we cannot completely exclude that targets of GSK3 other than miR-122 are additionally involved in the suppression of HCV replication by GSK3 inhibition. However, it appears plausible that depletion of miR-122 plays a key role in mediating suppression of HCV replication by GSK3-inhibition because miR-122 is one of the most important host factors on which HCV replication critically depends. A further confirmation of this notion is the important finding that the miR-122-independent HCV mutant is resistant to GSK3 inhibition. In addition, GSK3 inhibition had no suppressive effect on replication of HEV, a virus which does – in contrast to HCV – not depend on miR-122.

Our results confirm a study by Zeng et al., which has described a regulatory circuit between GSK3, miR-122 and insulin-like growth-factor 1 receptor in hepatocytes (Zeng et al., 2010). GSK3 is a multifunctional protein with an estimated 100 different substrates, thereby regulating numerous cellular processes and pathways beyond glucose metabolism. Hence, inappropriate GSK3 signaling appears to be involved in diverse diseases such as diabetes mellitus, cancer or Alzheimeŕs disease. Though a number of GSK3 inhibitors are in preclinical and clinical development, there is a concern of serious side effects due to the pleiotropic effects of GSK3. However, some of the most significant undesirable effects of GSK3 inhibition, in particular β-catenin accumulation with potential deleterious carcinogenic effects, develop as a result of combined inhibition of GSK3α and GSK3β (Rayasam et al., 2009). In this regard, the finding that only GSK3β but not GSK3α affects miR-122 levels is important because it may serve as a proof-of-principle that selectively targeting GSK3 isoforms may be a suitable approach to manipulate specific functions of GSK3. Our data further illustrate the need for dissecting the role of GSK3 isoforms separately instead of non-specifically referring to GSK3 inhibition.

In view of the pleiotropic cellular functions of GSK3 it is not surprising that viruses engage this important kinase to complete their life cycle. It has been shown that replication of the SARS coronavirus depends on GSK3-mediated phosphorylation of the nucleocapsid (N) protein which is a necessary process for viral replication (Wu et al., 2009). In addition, it was shown that GSK3β promotes the life cycle of influenza virus through facilitating the viral entry step (König et al., 2010). The here reported role of GSK3β in the HCV life cycle adds another facet to the dependence of viruses on this central kinase. Furthermore, the role of GSK3 in the HCV life cycle may be not restricted to HCV replication, as a recent report has shown that GSK3 supports HCV assembly by its involvement in lipoprotein production (Sarhan et al., 2017). While we did not make this observation in our experimental settings, our data indicate that it likely remains marginal compared to the role of GSK3 in supporting HCV RNA replication. Yet, the importance of these and our findings may rather consist in its implications for the understanding of the pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis C than in the identification of a novel target of antiviral therapy. GSK3 is a downstream target of insulin which is inhibited by insulin receptor signaling (Welsh and Proud, 1993). Reciprocally, GSK3 inhibits pivotal downstream targets of the insulin receptor under nonstimulated conditions, such as glycogen synthase (Woodgett and Cohen, 1984; Roach, 1991) and IRS-1 (Eldar-Finkelman and Krebs, 1997; Liberman and Eldar-Finkelman, 2005). As a result, increased GSK3 activity has been observed in diabetic tissues (Eldar-Finkelman et al., 1999; Nikoulina et al., 2000) and inhibition of GSK3 activity improves insulin resistance (Cline et al., 2002; Henriksen et al., 2003; Nikoulina et al., 2002). Consequently, one may speculate that the dependence of HCV on active GSK3 could explain a benefit for HCV of insulin resistance, which is induced by hepatitis C and which had been associated with lower chances of treatment-induced viral clearance in the era of interferon therapy (Romero-Gómez et al., 2005).

Author Contributions

MS, SR, CW, JG, and CL collected the data. MS, SR, SZ, DM, JG, and CL analyzed the data. All authors have contributed to the manuscript by planning the study, and preparing as well as revising the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

CL: speaker fees from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie. Unrestricted research support from Gilead Sciences. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Yolanda Martinez for expert technical assistance, Rolf Marschalek for helpful discussions as well as Ralf Bartenschlager, Jens Bukh, Suzanne U. Emerson, Charles M. Rice, and Jim Woodgett for reagents. Parts of this work have been presented as poster presentations at the International Liver Congress 2018 in Paris, France, and at the annual meeting of the German Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 2018 in Hamburg, Germany.

Abbreviations

DAAs

direct-acting antivirals

FCS

fetal calf serum

GSK3

glycogen synthase kinase 3

HCV

hepatitis C virus

HEV

hepatitis E virus

IRS-1

insulin receptor substrate-1

miR-122

microRNA-122

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

SARS

severe acute respiratory syndrome

siRNA

small interfering RNA

Footnotes

Funding. This study was supported by the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (2013-A165 to CL), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (LA 2806/2-1 and LA 2806/5-1), and the Swiss National Science Foundation (31003A_156030 and 31003A_179424 to DM).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02949/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (228.9KB, pdf)

References

  1. Bandiera S., Pfeffer S., Baumert T. F., Zeisel M. B. (2015). miR-122 – a key factor and therapeutic target in liver disease. J. Hepatol. 62 448–457. 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beurel E., Grieco S. F., Jope R. S. (2015). Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3): regulation, actions, and diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 148 114–131. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.11.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blight K. J., Kolykhalov A. A., Rice C. M. (2000). Efficient initiation of HCV RNA replication in cell culture. Science 290 1972–1974. 10.1126/science.290.5498.1972 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bose S. K., Shrivastava S., Meyer K., Ray R. B., Ray R. (2012). Hepatitis C virus activates the mTOR/S6K1 signaling pathway in inhibiting IRS-1 function for insulin resistance. J. Virol. 86 6315–6322. 10.1128/JVI.00050-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Castoldi M., Vujic Spasic M, Altamura S., Elmén J., Lindow M., Kiss J., et al. (2011). The liver-specific microRNA miR-122 controls systemic iron homeostasis in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 121 1386–1396. 10.1172/JCI44883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cline G. W., Johnson K., Regittnig W., Perret P., Tozzo E., Xiao L., et al. (2002). Effects of a novel glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibitor on insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism in zucker diabetic fatty (fa/fa) rats. Diabetes 51 2903–2910. 10.2337/diabetes.51.10.2903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen P., Frame S. (2001). The renaissance of GSK3. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2 769–776. 10.1038/35096075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dai C. Y., Huang J. F., Hsieh M. Y., Hou N. J., Lin Z. Y., Chen S. C., et al. (2009). Insulin resistance predicts response to peginterferon-alpha/ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients. J. Hepatol. 50 712–718. 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dao Thi VL, Debing Y., Wu X., Rice C. M., Neyts J., Moradpour D., et al. (2016). Sofosbuvir inhibits hepatitis e virus replication in vitro and results in an additive effect when combined with ribavirin∗. Gastroenterology 150 82.e4–85.e4. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. del Ser T, Steinwachs K. C., Gertz H. J., Andrés M. V., Gómez-Carrillo B., Medina M., et al. (2013). Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease with the GSK-3 inhibitor tideglusib: a pilot study. J. Alzheimers Dis. 33 205–215. 10.3233/JAD-2012-120805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eldar-Finkelman H., Krebs E. G. (1997). Phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate 1 by glycogen synthase kinase 3 impairs insulin action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94 9660–9664. 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eldar-Finkelman H., Schreyer S. A., Shinohara M. M., LeBoeuf R. C., Krebs E. G. (1999). Increased glycogen synthase kinase-3 activity in diabetes- and obesity-prone C57BL/6J mice. Diabetes 48 1662–1666. 10.2337/diabetes.48.8.1662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Esau C., Davis S., Murray S. F., Yu X. X., Pandey S. K., Pear M., et al. (2006). miR-122 regulation of lipid metabolism revealed by in vivo antisense targeting. Cell Metab. 3 87–98. 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fattovich G., Covolo L., Pasino M., Perini E., Rossi L., Brocco G., et al. (2011). The homeostasis model assessment of the insulin resistance score is not predictive of a sustained virological response in chronic hepatitis C patients. Liver Int. 31 66–74. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02343.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Grasso A., Malfatti F., De Leo P., Martines H., Fabris P., Toscanini F., et al. (2009). Insulin resistance predicts rapid virological response in non-diabetic, non-cirrhotic genotype 1 HCV patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin. J. Hepatol. 51 984–990. 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. He X., Saint-Jeannet J. P., Woodgett J. R., Varmus H. E., Dawid I. B. (1995). Glycogen synthase kinase-3 and dorsoventral patterning in Xenopus embryos. Nature 374 617–622. 10.1038/374617a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Henriksen E. J., Kinnick T. R., Teachey M. K., O’Keefe M. P., Ring D., Johnson K. W., et al. (2003). Modulation of muscle insulin resistance by selective inhibition of GSK-3 in zucker diabetic fatty rats. Am. J. Physiol. Metab. 284 E892–E900. 10.1152/ajpendo.00346.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Janssen H. L., Reesink H. W., Lawitz E. J., Zeuzem S., Rodriguez-Torres M., Patel K., et al. (2013). Treatment of HCV infection by targeting microRNA. N. Engl. J. Med. 368 1685–1694. 10.1056/NEJMoa1209026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jope R. S., Yuskaitis C. J., Beurel E. (2007). Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3): inflammation, diseases, and therapeutics. Neurochem. Res. 32 577–595. 10.1007/s11064-006-9128-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jopling C. L., Schutz S., Sarnow P. (2008). Position-dependent function for a tandem microRNA miR-122-binding site located in the hepatitis C virus RNA genome. Cell Host Microbe 4 77–85. 10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jopling C. L., Yi M., Lancaster A. M., Lemon S. M., Sarnow P. (2005). Modulation of hepatitis C virus RNA abundance by a liver-specific MicroRNA. Science 309 1577–1581. 10.1126/science.1113329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kawaguchi T., Yoshida T., Harada M., Hisamoto T., Nagao Y., Ide T., et al. (2004). Hepatitis C virus down-regulates insulin receptor substrates 1 and 2 through up-regulation of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3. Am. J. Pathol. 165 1499–1508. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63408-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Khattab M., Eslam M., Sharwae M. A., Shatat M., Ali A., Hamdy L. (2010). Insulin resistance predicts rapid virologic response to peginterferon/ribavirin combination therapy in hepatitis C genotype 4 patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 105 1970–1977. 10.1038/ajg.2010.110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. König R., Stertz S., Zhou Y., Inoue A., Hoffmann H. H., Bhattacharyya S., et al. (2010). Human host factors required for influenza virus replication. Nature 463 813–817. 10.1038/nature08699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lanford R. E., Hildebrandt-Eriksen E. S., Petri A., Persson R., Lindow M., Munk M. E., et al. (2010). Therapeutic silencing of microRNA-122 in primates with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Science 327 198–201. 10.1126/science.1178178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lange C. M., Gouttenoire J., Duong F. H., Morikawa K., Heim M. H., Moradpour D. (2014a). Vitamin D receptor and Jak-STAT signaling crosstalk results in calcitriol-mediated increase of hepatocellular response to IFN-. J. Immunol. 192 6037–6044. 10.4049/jimmunol.1302296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lange C. M., Jacobson I. M., Rice C. M., Zeuzem S. (2014b). Emerging therapies for the treatment of hepatitis C. EMBO Mol. Med. 1 4–15. 10.1002/emmm.201303131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li Y. P., Gottwein J. M., Scheel T. K., Jensen T. B., Bukh J. (2011). MicroRNA-122 antagonism against hepatitis C virus genotypes 1-6 and reduced efficacy by host RNA insertion or mutations in the HCV 5’ UTR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 4991–4996. 10.1073/pnas.1016606108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liberman Z., Eldar-Finkelman H. (2005). Serine 332 phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 by glycogen synthase kinase-3 attenuates insulin signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 280 4422–4428. 10.1074/jbc.M410610200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lindenbach B. D. (2005). Complete replication of hepatitis C virus in cell culture. Science 309 623–626. 10.1126/science.1114016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lovestone S., Boada M., Dubois B., Hüll M., Rinne J. O., Huppertz H. J., et al. (2015). A phase II trial of tideglusib in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 45 75–88. 10.3233/JAD-141959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Luna J. M., Scheel T. K., Danino T., Shaw K. S., Mele A., Fak J. J., et al. (2015). Hepatitis C virus RNA functionally sequesters miR-122. Cell 160 1099–1110. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Machlin E. S., Sarnow P., Sagan S. M. (2011). Masking the 5’ terminal nucleotides of the hepatitis C virus genome by an unconventional microRNA-target RNA complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108 3193–3198. 10.1073/pnas.1012464108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Meijer L., Flajolet M., Greengard P. (2004). Pharmacological inhibitors of glycogen synthase kinase 3. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 25 471–480. 10.1016/j.tips.2004.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moradpour D., Bieck E., Hügle T., Wels W., Wu J. Z., Hong Z., et al. (2002). Functional properties of a monoclonal antibody inhibiting the hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 277 593–601. 10.1074/jbc.M108748200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Moradpour D., Wakita T., Tokushige K., Carlson R. I., Krawczynski K., Wands J. R. (1996). Characterization of three novel monoclonal antibodies against hepatitis C virus core protein. J. Med. Virol. 48 234–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Moucari R., Ripault M. P., Martinot-Peignoux M., Voitot H., Cardoso A. C., Stern C., et al. (2009). Insulin resistance and geographical origin: major predictors of liver fibrosis and response to peginterferon and ribavirin in HCV-4. Gut 58 1662–1669. 10.1136/gut.2009.185074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Negro F. (2014). Facts and fictions of HCV and comorbidities: steatosis, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases. J. Hepatol. 61 S69–S78. 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nikoulina S. E., Ciaraldi T. P., Mudaliar S., Carter L., Johnson K., Henry R. R. (2002). Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3 improves insulin action and glucose metabolism in human skeletal muscle. Diabetes 51 2190–2198. 10.2337/diabetes.51.7.2190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nikoulina S. E., Ciaraldi T. P., Mudaliar S., Mohideen P., Carter L., Henry R. R. (2000). Potential role of glycogen synthase kinase-3 in skeletal muscle insulin resistance of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 49 263–271. 10.2337/diabetes.49.2.263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Petta S., Amato M., Cabibi D., Cammà C., Di Marco V, Giordano C., et al. (2010). Visceral adiposity index is associated with histological findings and high viral load in patients with chronic hepatitis C due to genotype 1. Hepatology 52 1543–1552. 10.1002/hep.23859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pietschmann T., Kaul A., Koutsoudakis G., Shavinskaya A., Kallis S., Steinmann E., et al. (2006). Construction and characterization of infectious intragenotypic and intergenotypic hepatitis C virus chimeras. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 7408–7413. 10.1073/pnas.0504877103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rayasam G. V., Tulasi V. K., Sodhi R., Davis J. A., Ray A. (2009). Glycogen synthase kinase 3: more than a namesake. Br. J. Pharmacol. 156 885–898. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2008.00085.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ring D. B., Johnson K. W., Henriksen E. J., Nuss J. M., Goff D., Kinnick T. R., et al. (2003). Selective glycogen synthase kinase 3 inhibitors potentiate insulin activation of glucose transport and utilization in vitro and in vivo. Diabetes 52 588–595. 10.2337/diabetes.52.3.588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Roach P. J. (1991). Multisite and hierarchal protein phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 266 14139–14142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Romero-Gómez M., Del Mar Viloria M, Andrade R. J., Salmerón J., Diago M., Fernández-Rodríguez C. M., et al. (2005). Insulin resistance impairs sustained response rate to peginterferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients. Gastroenterology 128 636–641. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.12.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sarhan M. A., Abdel-Hakeem M. S., Mason A. L., Tyrrell D. L., Houghton M. (2017). Glycogen synthase kinase 3β inhibitors prevent hepatitis a C virus release/assembly through perturbation of lipid metabolism. Sci. Rep. 7:2495. 10.1038/s41598-017-02648-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Shintani Y., Fujie H., Miyoshi H., Tsutsumi T., Tsukamoto K., Kimura S., et al. (2004). Hepatitis C virus infection and diabetes: direct involvement of the virus in the development of insulin resistance. Gastroenterology 126 840–848. 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.11.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Welsh G. I., Proud C. G. (1993). Glycogen synthase kinase-3 is rapidly inactivated in response to insulin and phosphorylates eukaryotic initiation factor eIF-2B. Biochem. J. 294(Pt 3), 625–629. 10.1042/bj2940625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Woodgett J. R., Cohen P. (1984). Multisite phosphorylation of glycogen synthase. Molecular basis for the substrate specificity of glycogen synthase kinase-3 and casein kinase-II (glycogen synthase kinase-5). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 788 339–347. 10.1016/0167-4838(84)90047-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu C. H., Yeh S. H., Tsay Y. G., Shieh Y. H., Kao C. L., Chen Y. S., et al. (2009). Glycogen synthase kinase-3 regulates the phosphorylation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nucleocapsid protein and viral replication. J. Biol. Chem. 284 5229–5239. 10.1074/jbc.M805747200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zeng C., Wang R., Li D., Lin X. J., Wei Q. K., Yuan Y., et al. (2010). A novel GSK-3 beta-C/EBP alpha-miR-122-insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor regulatory circuitry in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 52 1702–1712. 10.1002/hep.23875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhong J., Gastaminza P., Cheng G., Kapadia S., Kato T., Burton D. R., et al. (2005). Robust hepatitis C virus infection in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102 9294–9299. 10.1073/pnas.0503596102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (228.9KB, pdf)

Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES