Abstract
Purpose of review
Prostate cancer mortality rates are highest among men of African ancestry in the United States and globally. Environmental exposures and ancestry-related factors may influence tumor biology and induce a more aggressive disease in this population. Here, we summarize the most recent advances in our understanding of race/ethnic differences in the tumor biology of prostate cancer with an emphasis on the excess disease burden among African-Americans.
Recent findings
Results from several DNA methylation studies showed an increased prevalence in DNA hypermethylation at disease-related loci in tumors from African-American patients compared with tumors from European-American patients. Analyses of genome-wide gene expression in prostate tumors revealed frequent alterations in the expression of genes related to immunobiology among the African-American patients, consistent with immune response differences between them and their European-American counterparts. Lastly, population differences in the frequency of oncogenic ETS-related gene rearrangements were evaluated in three studies which showed that these alterations manifest themselves most commonly in tumors from men of European ancestry, but are significantly less frequent in men of African ancestry, while least common in men of Asian ancestry.
Summary
Analysis of tumor markers indicates that tumor biological differences may exist between prostate cancer patients of African ancestry and those of European or Asian ancestry. These differences could affect disease aggressiveness and response to therapy.
Keywords: prostate cancer, health disparity, tumor marker, genetics, outcome
(Introduction)
Disease characteristics of prostate cancer show significant geographical and ethnic variations [1]. Prostate cancer is more common in North America and Europe than in less affluent countries [2;3], but it remains unresolved whether the low reported occurrence rates for this disease in some geographic locations, such as Sub-Saharan Africa, are factually correct or an artifact of inadequate cancer surveillance. Yet, incidence and mortality rates of prostate cancer are significantly higher in men of African ancestry when compared with men from other population groups in the United States, the Caribbean, the United Kingdom, and in parts of South America [4;5•]. It is well recognized that prostate tumors tend to develop earlier as a clinical disease and are more aggressive at diagnosis in African-American men than in European-American men [6;7]. In addition, studies in West and Central Africa showed a notable prevalence of high grade and aggressive prostate tumors in men visiting hospitals in Nigeria, Senegal, Cameroon, and Kenya [5•].
The health disparity seen in prostate cancer within the United States has been attributed to several inter-related factors, including differences in socioeconomic status and lifestyle exposures, access to healthcare, racial and ethnic discrimination, language and cultural barriers, and a delayed disease diagnosis in socio economically deprived communities. Recently, research efforts have begun to concentrate on molecular mechanisms in tumor biology and ancestry-related aspects that may contribute to the existing prostate cancer health disparities. Previous epidemiological studies have shown that African-American men have significantly higher plasma PSA levels than European-American men [8;9], although the size of the prostate is similar in both groups of men [10]. The latter observation suggests that a generally enhanced androgenic and growth stimulatory effect is not present in the gland of men of African ancestry that would explain the elevated blood PSA levels [10]. Genome-wide genetic association studies described multiple genetic susceptibility loci for prostate cancer. The best characterized risk locus for the disease is located at 8q24, and several studies showed that this locus may confer a higher risk for prostate cancer in men of West African ancestry than in men of European ancestry because some risk-conferring single nucleotide polymorphisms occur at an increased frequency in ancestral West African men [11–14]. However, the aforementioned factors do not fully explain the observed differences in disease aggressiveness and mortality amongst the various race/ethnic groups in the United States. Therefore, it has been suggested that either still unrecognized ancestry-related factors or inter-ethnic differences in environmental exposures influence tumor biology and cause a more aggressive disease in some patient groups like men of African ancestry. One study addressed this question by analyzing prostate autopsy material from a total of 1056 African-American and European-American men who did not have a prior diagnosis of prostate cancer, and by comparing the autopsy findings with findings from the analysis of resected tumors. While the cancer prevalence and disease presentation was similar between the two race/ethnic groups at the subclinical stage, amongst patients with clinically detected prostate tumors, African-American men tended to have a more aggressive disease than European-American men by microscopic evaluation. The latter findings support the hypothesis that differences in tumor biology may exist between the two patient groups, leading to a faster growth rate and a more rapid transformation of tumors in men of African ancestry [7].
Evidence of race/ethnic differences in the tumor biology of prostate cancer
Most investigations into race/ethnic differences in tumor biology have compared African-American with European-American prostate cancer patients residing in the United States. Few studies have included patients of Asian descent, while even less have included patients of Hispanic/Latino and Native American descent. Several notable observations were made comparing prostate cancer patients of European, African, and Asian ancestry. Consistent differences in tumor biology between these patient groups were observed using 1) the analysis of DNA methylation patterns [15–17], 2) analysis of acquired genomic alterations and expression analysis of ETS related gene 1 (ERG) alterations [18•;19;20••;21•], and 3) genome-wide gene expression analysis [22••;23] (Table 1).
Table 1:
Tumor marker | Observation | Reference |
---|---|---|
DNA methylation | Increased prevalence of CD44 hypermethylation in African-American (AA) tumors | {Woodson, 2003 19827 /id} |
Increased prevalence of GSTP1 hypermethylation in AA tumors | {Enokida, 2005 20978 /id} | |
Increased prevalence of hypermethylation at several loci in AA prostate tissue | {Kwabi-Addo, 2010 21268 /id} | |
Acquired genomic alterations | Low frequency of ERG rearrangements and PTEN inactivation in Chinese tumors | {Mao, 2010 20690 /id} |
Significant difference in the frequency of TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion events between European-American (EA), AA and Japanese patients. Highest frequency in EA, lowest in Japanese patients. | {Magi-Galluzzi, 2011, 22239 /id} | |
ERG fusion oncogene expression is significantly higher in EA than in AA tumors (based on immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization analysis). | {Rosen, 2012 22577 /id} | |
Genome-wide gene expression | Prominent tumor immunobiological differences between AA and EA tumors related to immune response and inflammation. Presence of a distinct interferon-related gene signature in AA tumors. | {Wallace, 2008 18028 /id} |
Gene ontology terms prevalent in AA tumors included interleukins, chromatin maintenance, and myeloid dendritic cell proliferation. | {Reams, 2009 20021 /id} | |
Distinct DNA copy number alterations in AA tumor. The alterations commonly affect loci that encode genes related to immune response, which the authors confirmed by a genome-wide gene expression analysis. | {Rosen, 2012 22577 /id} |
Differences in DNA methylation
Epigenetic DNA alterations are commonly detected in human prostate tumors [24]. Alterations in DNA methylation are amongst the earliest somatic changes that can be detected in cancerous lesions of the prostate and occur at the stage of proliferative inflammatory atrophy, a precursor lesion in human prostate cancer development. Increased DNA methylation can lead to numerous downstream effects, including inactivation of PTEN, which may be the most significant tumor suppressor gene in prostate cancer, or a loss of GSTP1 expression, which is observed in 90% of prostate cancers [24]. Recently, a member of the zinc finger superfamily, termed Kaiso, was found to be overexpressed in prostate tumors from African-American patients [25•]. Nuclear translocation of this protein is induced by epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. Interestingly, Kaiso recognizes clusters of methylated CpG nucleotides and also induces migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells, suggesting that aberrant Kaiso expression in tumors from African-American men may enhance disease aggressiveness by mechanisms that include aberrant DNA methylation of cancer-related genomic loci.
Given the importance of epigenetic DNA alterations in the development and progression of prostate cancer, the occurrence of aberrant DNA methylation at disease-related loci in tumors from African-American patients has been evaluated by several investigators over the years. In these studies, a pattern emerged consistent with an increased prevalence of DNA hypermethylation at disease-related loci in African-American tumors when compared with similar stage tumors from European-American men [15–17]. The first study published in 2003 found a difference in the methylation status of CD44, the receptor for hyaluronic acid which also interacts with other ligands, such as osteopontin, collagens, and matrix metalloproteinases [15]. The second investigation observed an increased methylation of the GSTP1 locus in tumors of the African-American patients [16], while the most recent study reported methylation differences for multiple loci in cancerous and non-cancerous prostate tissue [17]. These findings will have to be followed up using state-of-the-art techniques with genome-wide coverage of CpG islands. Nevertheless, the consistency in the observations among the three reports suggests that gene silencing differences through epigenetic mechanisms may likely exist between patients of different race/ethnic descent. To date, we do not know what mechanisms may lead to race/ethnic differences in DNA methylation patterns, and whether these patterns are induced by environmental exposures, intrinsic differences in tumor biology, including cancer metabolism and metabolism-induced epigenetic alterations, or a combination of these factors. Recently, racial differences in gene-specific DNA methylation were reported to exist at birth [26]. In this particular study, the authors examined DNA methylation levels at 26,485 autosomal CpGs in blood samples from 107 African-American and 94 European-American newborns. Most notable, they observed significant differences in DNA methylation levels affecting cancer-related loci and pathways associated with pancreatic, prostate, bladder cancers and melanoma. The authors hypothesized that exposure associated with maternal diets may have caused the observed differences in the newborns.
Differences in acquired chromosomal aberrations
The acquisition of either loss-of-function or gain-of-function mutations in cancer-related genes and frequent chromosomal aberrations leading to both gene deletions and amplification are a hallmark of cancer. Hence, several research groups have investigated the occurrence of chromosomal alterations in prostate cancer, comparing tumors from African-Americans with tumors from European-Americans. In three studies, DNA copy number alterations in prostate tumors from the two patient groups were analyzed and compared [18•;27;28]. The first study analyzed 16 tumors from each patient group and did not observe significant differences in chromosomal aberrations between the patients [27]. The second study identified multiple regions that showed differences in allelic loss and gain between the two patient groups, but did not validate the findings in another patient cohort [28]. The third and most recent study evaluated genomic alterations in both a discovery and validation cohort and described chromosomal aberrations whose occurrence is most divergent between tumors from African-American and European-American men. The data from this study revealed common genomic alterations that appeared to be rather specific to African-American tumors and commonly affected loci encoding genes related to immune function [18•]. Other pathways that could be distinctively affected by chromosomal aberrations in tumors from African-American patients included catecholamine metabolic processes and neurotransmitter transport, suggesting possible differences in the beta adrenergic signaling pathway between African-American and European-American patients.
Recurrent genomic rearrangements at cancer-related loci like the TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion, which lead to fusion transcripts and oncogenic over-expression of ERG, are signature mutations of human prostate tumors and have important biological and clinical implications [29–31]. Tumors carrying them fall into a distinct molecular subclass [32]. Previously, ETS family-associated gene fusion events, involving ERG, ETV1 or ETV5, were reported to be less common in radical prostatectomy samples from Japanese prostate cancer patients when compared with the reported prevalence of these genetic alterations in tumors from European and European-American patients [33]. Three additional studies have examined the frequency of these recurrent ERG gene fusions in European, European-American, Chinese, Japanese, and African-American prostate cancer patients [19;20••;21•]. While common in European and European-American patients (~50% frequency), these alterations were found to be significantly less frequent in African-American patients (24% to 31% frequency), and rather uncommon in patients from Asia (2% to 16% frequency) in these studies. This pattern may not be restricted to TMPRSS2:ERG rearrangements. The inactivation of the PTEN tumor suppressor may follow a similar trend, but currently only one study has examined the frequency of 10q deletions across population groups comparing European with Chinese patients [19]. A loss of PTEN occurs commonly in prostate tumors of European patients (40% to 50%). However, the study by Mao et al. found 10q deletions to be uncommon in the Chinese patients (14%). Two other studies evaluated the frequency of PTEN alterations in patients from China and Japan. Unfortunately, these studies did not include European patients in their analysis for a direct comparison. PTEN mutations were detected in 16% of mostly high grade prostate tumors from Chinese patients [34]. In contrast, a PTEN mutation was not detected in the Japanese patient cohort and a PTEN loss occurred in only 2 out of 18 tumors (11%) [35]. The different frequency of ERG rearrangements and possibly PTEN loss between prostate cancer patients of European and Asian descent indicate that prostate tumors in Asian populations may arise from pathogenic mechanisms that are different from Western populations, which may be due to differences in environmental risk factors. Thus, prostate tumor biology may display an unexpected global heterogeneity between men of European, African and Asian descent with respect to acquired mutational events that define the natural history of the disease, but may also define disease aggressiveness [31]. These differences between patient groups may have clinical implications because tests to detect TMPRSS2:ERG fusion events are being developed as a biomarker for early detection of prostate cancer [36••]. Current data indicate that such a test may not perform as well in Asian and African-American patients as it does in patients of European ancestry.
Differences in gene expression patterns
Genome-wide gene expression profiling studies of human tumors led to the discovery of both disease subtypes and expression patterns that are predictive of disease outcome. These studies can be hypothesis-generating instruments that allow researchers to examine the phenotypic diversity of tumors and assist in discovering more subtle differences in tumor biology that are not readily accessible by other techniques. Thus, using this discovery tool can be very advantageous in exploring tumor biological differences in cancer health disparity research where we do not expect large differences between patient populations. Using a technique termed “Differential Display Analysis”, a novel prostate-specific gene, PCGEM1, that encodes a long non-coding RNA with a cell growth promoting function was discovered [37;38]. Further analyses revealed that this gene was most highly expressed in prostate tumors of African-American patients [38]. However, PCGEM1 has not been further examined in recent years, and we do not know whether this candidate gene may have an important oncogenic function in prostate cancer biology, particularly with respect to the African-American population.
We and others have used genome-wide gene expression profiling to investigate candidate differences in tumor biology between African-American and European-American prostate cancer patients [21•;22••;23;39]. From these studies, the consistent observation emerged that immunobiological differences may exist in tumors from the two patient groups. An analysis of 69 macro-dissected tumors from 33 African-American and 36 European-American patients that were matched on clinicopathological characteristics (patient’s age, Gleason score, disease stage, PSA at diagnosis, largest tumor nodule) identified numerous differences in the expression of genes related to immunobiology [22••]. These genes clustered in pathways related to immune response, host defense, cytokine signaling and chemotaxis, and inflammation. Most of the immune-related genes were expressed higher in tumors from African-American patients than in those from European-American patients. Previously, it was observed that low-grade chronic inflammation in the non-cancerous prostate gland is more prevalent in African-American men [8]. Thus, it is possible that the observed gene expression differences in the tumors are partly due to a low-grade chronic inflammation that is more prevalent in African-American tumors. Furthermore, several known metastasis-promoting genes, including AMFR, CXCR4, and MMP9, were more highly expressed in tumors from African-Americans than European-Americans [22••;39]. AMFR encodes the autocrine motility factor receptor, which increases cancer metastasis by targeting the tumor suppressor, KAI1, for degradation [40]. Intriguingly, a prominent interferon gene signature was also detected in African-American tumors that may relate to either an unknown etiologic agent in disease pathology (e.g., an infection), to acquired genetic alterations in the cancer cells, or to intrinsic differences in the immune response between patients of African ancestry and those of European ancestry. This particular signature appears to be identical to previously identified interferon-related gene signatures that were induced by both tumor-stroma interactions and acquired resistance to DNA damage [41–44]. Most notable, the interferon-related signature in these studies was found to be consistently associated with either metastasis or poor disease outcome. Because several genes that constitute the interferon signature are known to have an immunosuppressive activity in the tumor microenvironment, like indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase, it is our hypothesis that the immunologic profile in African-American tumors is immunosuppressive in nature, inhibiting the host response directed against cancer cells. The observed difference in the tumor immunobiology of prostate cancer between African-American and European-American patients may also have implications for cancer therapy. Clinical trials of immunotherapy for prostate cancer have been conducted and the Sipuleucel-T (PROVENGE®) autologous vaccine has been approved for treatment of patients with castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer [45]. The data presented in this review suggest that African-American and European-American patients might respond differently to these types of therapy.
Conclusions
The analysis of tumor markers showed that biological differences may exist in prostate cancer among patients of African, European or Asian ancestry. These alterations may arise because of ancestry-related factors, including differences in immune function, or may manifest themselves because of inter-ethnic differences in environmental exposures and in the tumor microenvironment that define pathogenetic (e.g., ERG rearrangement frequency and DNA methylation patterns) and tumor immunobiological mechanisms in prostate cancer development. These differences could also affect early disease detection and the response to therapy, and contribute to a distinct disease presentation of prostate cancer among men of African ancestry, including the excess mortality in this patient group in the United States and globally.
Bullet Points.
Men of African ancestry experience a disproportionately high prostate cancer mortality in the United States and globally
Analysis of tumor markers indicates that tumor biological differences exist between prostate cancer patients of African ancestry and those of European or Asian ancestry
Race/ethnic differences in acquired mutations and immunobiology in prostate tumors may affect early disease detection and the response to therapy, and contribute to a distinct disease presentation of prostate cancer among men of African ancestry
Acknowledgement of funding:
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, USA.
Abbreviations:
- ETS
erythroblast transformation-specific family of transcription factors
- ERG
v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (avian) or ETS related gene 1
- PSA
prostate specific antigen
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists, nor are there any relationships that they believe could be construed as resulting in an actual, potential, or perceived conflict of interest with regard to this manuscript.
References and recommended reading
• Of special interest
•• Of outstanding interest
- 1.Zeigler-Johnson CM, Rennert H, Mittal RD, Jalloh M, Sachdeva R, Malkowicz SB, Mandhani A, Mittal B, Gueye SM, Rebbeck TR: Evaluation of prostate cancer characteristics in four populations worldwide. Can.J.Urol 2008, 15:4056–4064. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF: Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J.Clin.Oncol 2006, 24:2137–2150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J.Clin 2011, 61:69–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009, 59:225–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wallace TA, Martin DN, Ambs S: Interactions among genes, tumor biology and the environment in cancer health disparities: examining the evidence on a national and global scale. Carcinogenesis 2011, 32:1107–1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • A comprehensive review that discusses the magnitude and causes of global cancer health disparities and evaluates the evidence that genetic and tumor biological factors contribute to the existing cancer incidence and cancer outcome differences among US population groups. Prostate cancer is one focus of this review.
- 6.Powell IJ: Epidemiology and pathophysiology of prostate cancer in African-American men. J Urol. 2007, 177:444–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Powell IJ, Bock CH, Ruterbusch JJ, Sakr W: Evidence supports a faster growth rate and/or earlier transformation to clinically significant prostate cancer in black than in white American men, and influences racial progression and mortality disparity. J.Urol 2010, 183:1792–1796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Eastham JA, May RA, Whatley T, Crow A, Venable DD, Sartor O: Clinical characteristics and biopsy specimen features in African-American and white men without prostate cancer. J Natl.Cancer Inst 1998, 90:756–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Freedland SJ, Sutter ME, Naitoh J, Dorey F, Csathy GS, Aronson WJ: Clinical characteristics in black and white men with prostate cancer in an equal access medical center. Urology 2000, 55:387–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mavropoulos JC, Partin AW, Amling CL, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Aronson WJ, Presti JC Jr., Mangold LA, Freedland SJ: Do racial differences in prostate size explain higher serum prostate-specific antigen concentrations among black men? Urology 2007, 69:1138–1142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Freedman ML, Haiman CA, Patterson N, McDonald GJ, Tandon A, Waliszewska A, Penney K, Steen RG, Ardlie K, John EM, Oakley-Girvan I, Whittemore AS, Cooney KA, Ingles SA, Altshuler D, Henderson BE, Reich D: Admixture mapping identifies 8q24 as a prostate cancer risk locus in African-American men. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A 2006, 103:14068–14073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Amundadottir LT, Sulem P, Gudmundsson J, Helgason A, Baker A, Agnarsson BA, Sigurdsson A, Benediktsdottir KR, Cazier JB, Sainz J, Jakobsdottir M, Kostic J, Magnusdottir DN, Ghosh S, Agnarsson K, Birgisdottir B, Le Roux L, Olafsdottir A, Blondal T, Andresdottir M, Gretarsdottir OS, Bergthorsson JT, Gudbjartsson D, Gylfason A, Thorleifsson G, Manolescu A, Kristjansson K, Geirsson G, Isaksson H, Douglas J, Johansson JE, Balter K, Wiklund F, Montie JE, Yu X, Suarez BK, Ober C, Cooney KA, Gronberg H, Catalona WJ, Einarsson GV, Barkardottir RB, Gulcher JR, Kong A, Thorsteinsdottir U, Stefansson K: A common variant associated with prostate cancer in European and African populations. Nat.Genet 2006, 38:652–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haiman CA, Patterson N, Freedman ML, Myers SR, Pike MC, Waliszewska A, Neubauer J, Tandon A, Schirmer C, McDonald GJ, Greenway SC, Stram DO, Le Marchand L, Kolonel LN, Frasco M, Wong D, Pooler LC, Ardlie K, Oakley-Girvan I, Whittemore AS, Cooney KA, John EM, Ingles SA, Altshuler D, Henderson BE, Reich D: Multiple regions within 8q24 independently affect risk for prostate cancer. Nat.Genet 2007, 39:638–644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Haiman CA, Chen GK, Blot WJ, Strom SS, Berndt SI, Kittles RA, Rybicki BA, Isaacs WB, Ingles SA, Stanford JL, Diver WR, Witte JS, Chanock SJ, Kolb S, Signorello LB, Yamamura Y, Neslund-Dudas C, Thun MJ, Murphy A, Casey G, Sheng X, Wan P, Pooler LC, Monroe KR, Waters KM, Le ML, Kolonel LN, Stram DO, Henderson BE: Characterizing genetic risk at known prostate cancer susceptibility loci in African Americans. PLoS.Genet 2011, 7:e1001387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Woodson K, Hayes R, Wideroff L, Villaruz L, Tangrea J: Hypermethylation of GSTP1, CD44, and E-cadherin genes in prostate cancer among US Blacks and Whites. Prostate 2003, 55:199–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Enokida H, Shiina H, Urakami S, Igawa M, Ogishima T, Pookot D, Li LC, Tabatabai ZL, Kawahara M, Nakagawa M, Kane CJ, Carroll PR, Dahiya R: Ethnic group-related differences in CpG hypermethylation of the GSTP1 gene promoter among African-American, Caucasian and Asian patients with prostate cancer. Int.J.Cancer 2005, 116:174–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kwabi-Addo B, Wang S, Chung W, Jelinek J, Patierno SR, Wang BD, Andrawis R, Lee NH, Apprey V, Issa JP, Ittmann M: Identification of differentially methylated genes in normal prostate tissues from African American and Caucasian men. Clin.Cancer Res 2010, 16:3539–3547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rose AE, Satagopan JM, Oddoux C, Zhou Q, Xu R, Olshen AB, Yu JZ, Dash A, Jean-Gilles J, Reuter V, Gerald WL, Lee P, Osman I: Copy number and gene expression differences between African American and Caucasian American prostate cancer. J.Transl.Med 2010, 8:70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Authors used array comparative genomic hybridization to identify genomic loci to describe chromosomal aberrations whose occurrence is most divergent between prostate tumors from African-American and European-American patients. The data from this study revealed commonly occurring genomic alterations in African-American tumors that affected loci encoding genes related to immune function and catecholamine metabolic processes.
- 19.Mao X, Yu Y, Boyd LK, Ren G, Lin D, Chaplin T, Kudahetti SC, Stankiewicz E, Xue L, Beltran L, Gupta M, Oliver RT, Lemoine NR, Berney DM, Young BD, Lu YJ: Distinct genomic alterations in prostate cancers in Chinese and Western populations suggest alternative pathways of prostate carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2010, 70:5207–5212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Magi-Galluzzi C, Tsusuki T, Elson P, Simmerman K, Lafargue C, Esgueva R, Klein E, Rubin MA, Zhou M: TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion prevalence and class are significantly different in prostate cancer of Caucasian, African-American and Japanese patients. Prostate 2011, 71:489–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Authors describe a significant difference in the frequency of TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion events between European-American, African-American, and Japanese patients. Highest frequency was observed in European-Americans, lowest in Japanese patients. In addition, a gene fusion through a deletion event was found to be the predominant mutational mechanism in African-American patients and was significantly more common in these patients than in the European-American and Japanese patients.
- 21.Rosen P, Pfister D, Young D, Petrovics G, Chen Y, Cullen J, Bohm D, Perner S, Dobi A, McLeod DG, Sesterhenn IA, Srivastava S: Differences in Frequency of ERG Oncoprotein Expression Between Index Tumors of Caucasian and African American Patients With Prostate Cancer. Urology 2012, 80: 749–753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • This follow-up study corroborates previous findings by showing that the prevalence of ERG oncoprotein expression in prostate tumors is different between African-American and European-American patients. A markedly greater frequency of ERG overexpression was detected in European-American patients (63.3%) than African-American patients (28.6%).
- 22.Wallace TA, Prueitt RL, Yi M, Howe TM, Gillespie JW, Yfantis HG, Stephens RM, Caporaso NE, Loffredo CA, Ambs S: Tumor immunobiological differences in prostate cancer between African-American and European-American men. Cancer Res. 2008, 68:927–936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Analyzing prostate tumors using genome-wide gene expression profiling, the authors identified gene expression differences between African-American and European-American men that portray the existence of a distinct tumor microenvironment in these two patient groups. Numerous differentially expressed genes clustered in pathways related to immune response, host defense, cytokine signaling and chemotaxis, and inflammation. The findings indicate the presence of a distinct immune signature in tumors of African-American patients that may influence the response to therapy (e.g., immunotherapy).
- 23.Reams RR, Agrawal D, Davis MB, Yoder S, Odedina FT, Kumar N, Higginbotham JM, Akinremi T, Suther S, Soliman KF: Microarray comparison of prostate tumor gene expression in African-American and Caucasian American males: a pilot project study. Infect.Agent.Cancer 2009, 4 Suppl 1:S3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nelson WG, De Marzo AM, Yegnasubramanian S: Epigenetic alterations in human prostate cancers. Endocrinology 2009, 150:3991–4002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jones J, Wang H, Zhou J, Hardy S, Turner T, Austin D, He Q, Wells A, Grizzle WE, Yates C: Nuclear kaiso indicates aggressive prostate cancers and promotes migration and invasiveness of prostate cancer cells. Am.J.Pathol 2012, 181:1836–1846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; • Study reports that nuclear expression of the DNA binding protein and transcription factor, Kaiso, is increased in aggressive prostate cancer and in tumors of African-American patients. Cell culture-based experiments show that nuclear translocation of Kaiso is induced by EGFR signaling and induces an aggressive phenotype, including epithelial to mesenchymal transition and increased migration and invasion.
- 26.Adkins RM, Krushkal J, Tylavsky FA, Thomas F: Racial differences in gene-specific DNA methylation levels are present at birth. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol.Teratol 2011, 91:728–736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cher ML, Lewis PE, Banerjee M, Hurley PM, Sakr W, Grignon DJ, Powell IJ: A similar pattern of chromosomal alterations in prostate cancers from African-Americans and Caucasian Americans. Clin.Cancer Res 1998, 4:1273–1278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Castro P, Creighton CJ, Ozen M, Berel D, Mims MP, Ittmann M: Genomic profiling of prostate cancers from African American men. Neoplasia. 2009, 11:305–312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tomlins SA, Laxman B, Dhanasekaran SM, Helgeson BE, Cao X, Morris DS, Menon A, Jing X, Cao Q, Han B, Yu J, Wang L, Montie JE, Rubin MA, Pienta KJ, Roulston D, Shah RB, Varambally S, Mehra R, Chinnaiyan AM: Distinct classes of chromosomal rearrangements create oncogenic ETS gene fusions in prostate cancer. Nature 2007, 448:595–599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kumar-Sinha C, Tomlins SA, Chinnaiyan AM: Recurrent gene fusions in prostate cancer. Nat.Rev.Cancer 2008, 8:497–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rosen P, Sesterhenn IA, Brassell SA, McLeod DG, Srivastava S, Dobi A: Clinical potential of the ERG oncoprotein in prostate cancer. Nat.Rev.Urol 2012, 9:131–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Setlur SR, Mertz KD, Hoshida Y, Demichelis F, Lupien M, Perner S, Sboner A, Pawitan Y, Andren O, Johnson LA, Tang J, Adami HO, Calza S, Chinnaiyan AM, Rhodes D, Tomlins S, Fall K, Mucci LA, Kantoff PW, Stampfer MJ, Andersson SO, Varenhorst E, Johansson JE, Brown M, Golub TR, Rubin MA: Estrogen-dependent signaling in a molecularly distinct subclass of aggressive prostate cancer. J.Natl.Cancer Inst 2008, 100:815–825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Miyagi Y, Sasaki T, Fujinami K, Sano J, Senga Y, Miura T, Kameda Y, Sakuma Y, Nakamura Y, Harada M, Tsuchiya E: ETS family-associated gene fusions in Japanese prostate cancer: analysis of 194 radical prostatectomy samples. Mod.Pathol 2010, 23:1492–1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dong JT, Li CL, Sipe TW, Frierson HF Jr.: Mutations of PTEN/MMAC1 in primary prostate cancers from Chinese patients. Clin Cancer Res 2001, 7:304–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Orikasa K, Fukushige S, Hoshi S, Orikasa S, Kondo K, Miyoshi Y, Kubota Y, Horii A: Infrequent genetic alterations of the PTEN gene in Japanese patients with sporadic prostate cancer. J.Hum.Genet 1998, 43:228–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tomlins SA, Aubin SM, Siddiqui J, Lonigro RJ, Sefton-Miller L, Miick S, Williamsen S, Hodge P, Meinke J, Blase A, Penabella Y, Day JR, Varambally R, Han B, Wood D, Wang L, Sanda MG, Rubin MA, Rhodes DR, Hollenbeck B, Sakamoto K, Silberstein JL, Fradet Y, Amberson JB, Meyers S, Palanisamy N, Rittenhouse H, Wei JT, Groskopf J, Chinnaiyan AM: Urine TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcript stratifies prostate cancer risk in men with elevated serum PSA. Sci.Transl.Med 2011, 3:94ra72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; •• Describes the development and application of a non-invasive assay that quantitatively measures the abundance of TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcripts in urine samples, with the aim to develop this method into a biomarker assay for prostate cancer early detection. The study not only shows that this urine-based assay either alone or in combination with a urine prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) transcript assay can diagnose prostate cancer, but also provides evidence that the assay(s) predict the presence of an aggressive disease, specifically when used in combination with other clinical parameters. Based on the study findings, the combination of the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion and PCA3 transcript assays would perform better than other clinicopathological parameters currently used in patient risk stratification for clinical management.
- 37.Srikantan V, Zou Z, Petrovics G, Xu L, Augustus M, Davis L, Livezey JR, Connell T, Sesterhenn IA, Yoshino K, Buzard GS, Mostofi FK, McLeod DG, Moul JW, Srivastava S: PCGEM1, a prostate-specific gene, is overexpressed in prostate cancer. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A 2000, 97:12216–12221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Petrovics G, Zhang W, Makarem M, Street JP, Connelly R, Sun L, Sesterhenn IA, Srikantan V, Moul JW, Srivastava S: Elevated expression of PCGEM1, a prostate-specific gene with cell growth-promoting function, is associated with high-risk prostate cancer patients. Oncogene 2004, 23:605–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Timofeeva OA, Zhang X, Ressom HW, Varghese RS, Kallakury BV, Wang K, Ji Y, Cheema A, Jung M, Brown ML, Rhim JS, Dritschilo A: Enhanced expression of SOS1 is detected in prostate cancer epithelial cells from African-American men. Int.J Oncol 2009, 35:751–760. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tsai YC, Mendoza A, Mariano JM, Zhou M, Kostova Z, Chen B, Veenstra T, Hewitt SM, Helman LJ, Khanna C, Weissman AM: The ubiquitin ligase gp78 promotes sarcoma metastasis by targeting KAI1 for degradation. Nat.Med 2007, 13:1504–1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Einav U, Tabach Y, Getz G, Yitzhaky A, Ozbek U, Amariglio N, Izraeli S, Rechavi G, Domany E: Gene expression analysis reveals a strong signature of an interferon-induced pathway in childhood lymphoblastic leukemia as well as in breast and ovarian cancer. Oncogene 2005, 24:6367–6375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Buess M, Nuyten DS, Hastie T, Nielsen T, Pesich R, Brown PO: Characterization of heterotypic interaction effects in vitro to deconvolute global gene expression profiles in cancer. Genome Biol 2007, 8:R191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Weichselbaum RR, Ishwaran H, Yoon T, Nuyten DS, Baker SW, Khodarev N, Su AW, Shaikh AY, Roach P, Kreike B, Roizman B, Bergh J, Pawitan Y, Van de Vijver MJ, Minn AJ: An interferon-related gene signature for DNA damage resistance is a predictive marker for chemotherapy and radiation for breast cancer. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A 2008, 105:18490–18495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Khodarev NN, Roach P, Pitroda SP, Golden DW, Bhayani M, Shao MY, Darga TE, Beveridge MG, Sood RF, Sutton HG, Beckett MA, Mauceri HJ, Posner MC, Weichselbaum RR: STAT1 pathway mediates amplification of metastatic potential and resistance to therapy. PLoS.ONE 2009, 4:e5821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gardner TA, Elzey BD, Hahn NM: Sipuleucel-T (Provenge) autologous vaccine approved for treatment of men with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Hum.Vaccin.Immunother 2012, 8:534–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]