Abstract
The trifluoromethoxy (OCF3) radical is of great importance in organic chemistry. Yet, catalytic and selective generation of this radical at room temperature and pressure remains a longstanding challenge. Herein, we report the design and development of a redox- active cationic reagent 1 that enables the formation of the OCF3 radical in a controllable, selective, and catalytic fashion under visible light photocatalytic conditions. More importantly, the reagent allows catalytic, intermolecular C-H trifluoromethoxylation of a broad array of (hetero)arenes and biorelevant compounds. Experimental and computational studies suggest single electron transfer (SET) from excited photoredox catalysts to 1 resulting in exclusive liberation of the OCF3 radical. Addition of this radical to (hetero)arenes gives trifluoromethoxylated cyclohexadienyl radicals that are oxidized and deprotonated to afford the products of trifluoromethoxylation.
Keywords: trifluoromethoxylation, radical, arenes, photocatalysis, trifluoromethoxylating reagent
Graphical Abstract
One Radical at a Time: Redox-active cationic OCF3 reagents enable catalytic and selective formation of the OCF3 radical under visible-light photocatalytic conditions. Its synthetic utility is highlighted by late-stage C-H trifluoromethoxylation of (hetero)arenes and biorelevant molecules.

The OCF3 radical is of significant interest to synthetic chemists because this open shell intermediate has reactivity that is complementary with and difficult-to-achieve by the OCF3 anion.[1] While the weakly nucleophilic CF3O anion often requires activated electrophiles such as carbocations,[2] the reactive OCF3 radical reacts favourably with unactivated organic compounds (e.g., benzene) than undergoes self-decomposition (Scheme 1a). Thus, easy-to-handle reagents capable of liberation of the versatile OCF3 radical at room temperature are highly desired because it not only creates a reaction platform for the design and development of novel trifluoromethoxylation reactions of hydrocarbons but also provides direct access to underexplored OCF3 chemical space.[3]
Scheme 1.
Formation and reactions of the OCF3 radical.
Seeking to develop OCF3-radical reagents for trifluoromethoxylation of hydrocarbons, we took advantage of the weak N-OCF3 bond (BDE = 53.1 kcal/mol) and recently reported a photoactive OCF3-reagent that could be photolyzed under irradiation of violet light (λmax = 402 nm) to form the OCF3 radical and an N-centered benzimidazole radical (Scheme 1b).[3m] Although the reagent is capable of trifluoromethoxylation of arenes, the reaction is complicated by the formation of the N-arylated side products (3%−10%). Also, the formation of the OCF3 radical is a stochiometric process because whenever the reagent is photoexcited, the N-OCF3 bond would homolyze to form two radical species. We questioned whether the OCF3 radical could be generated catalytically and selectively using a redox-active OCF3-reagent. Herein, we report the design and development of such a reagent bearing benzotriazole core for a direct, catalytic C-H trifluoromethoxylation of (hetero)arenes (Scheme 1c).
Our redox-active reagents are based on 1-hydroxy-benzotriazole scaffolds because these compounds, widely used in peptide synthesis, are inexpensive. Also, they can be easily prepared through a one-step condensation reaction of ortho-halonitrobenzene with hydrazine, which allows rapid exploration of the structure-reactivity relationship of OCF3-reagents.[4] Moreover, we have successfully established a reaction protocol for the synthesis of 1-OCF3-benzotriazole compounds (e.g., A, Table 1). More importantly, O-acylated 1-hydroxy-benzotriazoles are capable of accepting an electron to form the corresponding radical anion leading to the mesolytic cleavage of the N-O to afford an O-centered radical.[5] Thus, a series of 1-OCF3- benzotriazole reagents were synthesized.
Table 1.
Selected Optimization Experiments[a]
|
10 equivalents of 2a was used.
Yields were determined by 19F-NMR using PhCF3 as an internal standard.
1 equivalent of 2a was used.
Without light.
Under air atmosphere.
With100 equivalent of H2O.
Photoredox catalysis has recently emerged as a powerful tool in organic synthesis.[6] We hypothesised that an appropriate combination of photoredox catalysts and 1-OCF3-benzotriazole reagents would allow the catalytic formation of the OCF3 radical via a sequential SET process. An initial attempt of subjecting compound A to a mixture of 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene (2a, 10 equiv) and Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 (1 mol%) in MeCN (0.200 M) under irradiation of 10 W blue LED light (λmax = 447 nm) failed to produce the desired product 3a (Table 1, entry 1). Presumably, this is due to the highly negative reduction potential of A (Ep = −1.97 V vs SCE, Fig. S12). Even if the corresponding radical anion can be accessed, DFT calculations show that the mesolytic cleavage of the N-OCF3 bond would favour the formation of the N-centered benzotriazole radical rather than the OCF3 radical because of the electron withdrawing group (e.g., CF3) on the O-atom (Fig. S6).[3m,7] We reasoned that cationic N-OCF3 reagents would be better electron acceptor and the resulting reduced neutral radicals would fragment to form the OCF3 radical selectively (Scheme 2a). Indeed, using methylated cationic reagent B instead of A under otherwise identical conditions gave 3a in 60% yield along with 33% of byproducts B’ (entry 2).[8] Deactivation of the benzotriazole ring with an addition of a nitro-group (reagent 1) suppressed the formation of B’ and increased the product yield to 70% (entry 3). Using a solvent mixture of MeCN and CH2Cl2 (1:1 v/v) further improved the yield to 84% (entry 4) and no N-arylated side product was observed. The reaction also worked with one equivalent of trichlorobenzene albeit in a lower yield and accompanied by 15% of bis-trifluoromethoxylated product (entry 5). Control experiments confirmed the necessity of the visible light and photoredox catalysts (entries 6 and 7). Notably, the reaction proceeded under an air atmosphere or in the presence of water without loss of reactivity (entries 8 and 9).
Scheme 2.
Reaction energies and the proposed catalytic cycle. DFT calculations were performed at the M06–2X/6–311++G(d,p)/SMD(MeCN)//M06–2X/6–31+G(d) level of theory using benzene as the substrate. All energies are in kcal/mol and are with respect to II and 1. See SI for details.
With the optimized conditions (Table 1, entry 4) in hand, we turned our attention to explore the generality of the transformation. To our delight, a wide range of mono-, di-, and tri-substituted (hetero)arenes reacted well to afford the desired C-H trifluoromethoxylation products. Functional groups such as halides (F, Cl, Br, 2a-2g, 2s-2t, 2v-2ab, 2ae-2ag, and 2ai-2aj), carboxylic acids (2g-2h, 2aj), ketones (2i and 2ae), esters (2j-2k, 2u, 2ac, 2ae-2ah), aldehyde (2aa), substrates with weak benzylic hydrogen atoms (BDE = ~88 kcal/mol, 2m, 2v-2w, 2ad and 2ah),[9] nitrile (2o, 2z, and 2ad), sulfonyl (2q and 2ai), phosphine oxide (2r), and CF3 (2f) groups are all tolerated. In contrast to the previously reported photoactive reagent,[3m] redox-active reagent 1 could be used to functionalize electron rich arenes such as toluene (2m) and tert-butyl benzene (2n), affording the desired products in synthetically useful yields. Notably, heteroarenes such as pyridine, pyrimidine, and thiophene (2s-2ad), found in thousands of medicinally important structures, could also be used in this reaction. Although ten equivalents of arenes were used, we could recover 7.9–9.2 equivalents of aromatic substrates at the end of the reaction, which is critical for valuable arenes. The synthetic utility of this process is further highlighted by its amenability to a late-stage trifluoromethoxylation of biorelevant molecules using arenes as a limiting reactant. For example, trans-androsterone, diacetonefructose, L-menthol (analgesics and decongestants), and Metronidazole® (antibiotic) derivatives reacted to afford the desired OCF3-analogs (3ae-3ah) in modest yields based on the recovery of starting materials. Other marketed drugs such as Chlorpropamide® (anti-diabetic drug, 2ai) and Baclofen® (muscle relaxant, 2aj) were viable substrates as well.
The regioselectivity of the reaction resembles other radical- mediated aromatic substitution processes and is guided by the electronics of the substituent except in the case of a bulky substituent, for example, substrate 2o, where the OCF3 radical adds preferably to the position distal from the tert-Bu group. Also, if an aromatic substrate has multiple reaction sites, the OCF3 radical will add to these sites to form regioisomers. Isolation of these regioisomers allows rapid biological-activity assays of OCF3-analogs and accelerates the discovery of new drugs.[10]
Our unique ability to catalytically and selectively generate the OCF3 radical at ambient conditions allows studying its property and reactivity in organic solvents. Intermolecular competition experiments demonstrated that the electrophilic OCF3 radical reacts favourably with an electron-rich arene (Fig. S8). Deuterium kinetic isotope effect (KIE) studies showed no KIE (Fig. S9), which rules out the possibility of H-atom abstraction/deprotonation as the rate-determining step. Determination of the quantum yield and quenching constant via Stern-Volmer quenching studies proved to be challenging because the Ru(bpy)32+ sensitiser and reagent 1 both absorb in the visible light region (Fig. S3 and S4). Nevertheless, light on/off experiments showed that the reaction halted when the irradiation stopped (Fig. S10), which indicates that a long radical chain mechanism is unlikely. This corroborates with DFT calculations, where SET between Ru(bpy)33+ and IV is favourable by ΔG = −25.7 kcal/mol (Fig. S7). Since the reaction is insensitive to oxygen (Table 1, entry 8), reagent 1 should quench excited Ru(bpy)32+ faster than molecular oxygen and have the quenching constant of at least 2.7 × 109 s−1.[11] Finally, DFT calculations showed favourable SET between excited *Ru(bpy)32+ and 1 to form neutral radical 1a (ΔG = −20.9 kcal/mol) that readily undergoes homolytic cleavage of the N-OCF3 bond (ΔG = −22.4 kcal/mol), thereby catalytically and exclusively delivering the OCF3 radical (Scheme 2a).
Based on the collective results, a catalytic cycle proposed in Scheme 2b serves as a working mechanistic hypothesis. Initial excitation of the Ru(bpy)32+ (I, bpy = 2,2’-bipyridine) produces the long-lived triplet-excited state of *Ru(bpy)32+ (II, t1/2 = 1.1 μs).[12] Catalyst II is sufficiently reducing (E½red = −0.81 V) to undergo SET with the redox-active reagent 1 (Ep = +0.140 V, vs SCE in CH3CN, Fig. S10) to generate Ru(bpy)33+ and neutral radical 1a that fragments to exclusively liberate the OCF3 radical. Its addition to an arene to form cyclohexadienyl radical IV is thermodynamically favourable (ΔG = −9.2 kcal/mol). Oxidation of IV by Ru(bpy)33+ affords cyclohexadienyl cation V, which is deprotonated to give the desired product of trifluoromethoxylation.
In conclusion, we describe the air- and moisture-stable, redox-active reagent 1 that enables catalytic and selective generation of the OCF3 radical under visible-light photocatalytic conditions at room temperature. A key design feature of the reagent is its cationic nature that favours the formation of a single OCF3 radical species after the SET reduction. Reagent 1 is applicable to the synthesis of an important class of OCF3-arenes and late-stage C-H trifluoromethoxylation of biorelevant molecules. Mechanistic studies suggest a catalytic cycle distinct from the previously reported photoactive OCF3-reagent. Upon completion of this work, Togni et al. reported an elegant radical trifluoromethoxylation reaction using the similar concept.[13] Their protocol uses cationic pyridinium OCF3 reagents, first developed by Umemoto and Hu,[14] to generate the OCF3 radical under photocatalytic conditions. We anticipate that the unique ability to catalytically access the OCF3 radical using their and our reagents will open a new avenue for the development of trifluoromethoxylation reactions to aid the discovery of novel functional molecules.
Supplementary Material
Table 2.
Selected Examples of (Hetero)aryl C-H Trifluoromethoxylationa
|
Reactions were performed using 1 equivalent of 1 and 10 equivalents of (hetero)arenes. Yields and regioselectivity were determined by 19F-NMR using PhCF3 as an internal standard.
MeCN was used as the solvent.
Reactions were performed using 1 equivalent of substrates and 2 equivalents of reagent 1. The isolated yield based on the recovered starting material.
Yield in parenthesis is of isolated yield.
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this work was provided by NIH (R35GM119652 to M.-Y.N.) and the NSF (CHE-1654122 to P.L.). We thank Peng Zhao for help with measurement of the emission spectrum of the LED light and Zhixiu Liang for the CV measurements. We thank TOSOH F-Tech, Inc. for their gift of TMSCF3 for the preparation of Togni reagents. Calculations were performed at the Center for Research Computing at the University of Pittsburgh and the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE) supported by the NSF (ACI-1053575).
References
- [1] (a).Rozen S, Chem. Rev 1996, 96, 1717–1736; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Venturini F, Navarrini W, Famulari A, Sansotera M, Dardani P, Tortelli V, J. Fluorine Chem 2012, 140, 43–48. [Google Scholar]
- [2] (a).Hojczyk KN, Feng PJ, Zhan CB, Ngai MY, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53, 14559–14563; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 14787–14791; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhou M, Ni C, Zeng Y, Hu J, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Leroux FR, Manteau B, Vors JP, Pazenok S, Beilstein J Org. Chem 2008, 4, 13;Tlili A, Toulgoat F, Billard T, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 11726–11735; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 11900–11909;Lee KN, Lee JW, Ngai M-Y, Synlett 2016, 27, 313319; For Silver-mediated process:Huang C, Liang T, Harada S, Lee E, Ritter T, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 13308–13310;Liu JB, Chen C, Chu L, Chen ZH, Xu XH, Qing FL, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015. 54, 11839–11842; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127,12005–12008;Khotavivattana T, Verhoog S, Tredwell M, Pfeifer L, Calderwood S, Wheelhouse K, Collier TL, Gouverneur V, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 9991–9995; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 10129–10133;Zhang QW, Brusoe AT, Mascitti V, Hesp KD, Blakemore DC, Kohrt JT, Hartwig JF, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 9758–9762; Angew. Chem. 2016 128, 9910–9914. For catalytic trifluoromethoxylation of alkenes, see:Chen C, Chen P, Liu G, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 1564815651;Guo S, Cong F, Guo R, Wang L, Tang P, Nat Chem 2017, 9, 546–551;Chen C, Luo Y, Fu L, Chen P, Lan Y, Liu G, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 1207–1210; For catalytic decarboxylative fluorination of aryloxydifluorocarboxylic acids, see:Zhou M, Ni CF, He ZB, Hu JB, Org. Lett 2016, 18, 3754–3757; For catalytic allylic CH trifluoromethoxylation, see:Qi X, Chen P, Liu G, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 9517–9521; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 9645–9649; For catalytic radical C-H trifluoromethoxylation of (heteroarenes), see:Zheng W, Morales-Rivera CA, Lee JW, Liu P, Ngai MY, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 9645–9649; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 9793–9797.
- [4].Fu J, Yang Y, Zhang X-W, Mao W-J, Zhang Z-M, Zhu H-L, Bioorg. Med. Chem 2010, 18, 8457–8462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Cornella J, Edwards JT, Qin T, Kawamura S, Wang J, Pan CM, Gianatassio R, Schmidt M, Eastgate MD, Baran PS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 2174–2177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6] (a).Prier CK, Rankic DA, MacMillan DWC, Chem. Rev 2013, 113, 5322–5363; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Karkas MD, Porco JA Jr., Stephenson CR, Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 9683–9747; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Romero NA, Nicewicz DA, Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 10075–10166; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Skubi KL, Blum TR, Yoon TP, Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 10035–10074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Allen LJ, Cabrera PJ, Lee M, Sanford MS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 5607–5610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
[8].Trifluoromethoxylation of reagent byproduct.
- [9].Ellison GB, Davico GE, Bierbaum VM, DePuy CH, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1996, 156, 109–131. [Google Scholar]
- [10].Nagib DA, MacMillan DW, Nature 2011, 480, 224–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Abdel - Shafi AA, Beer PD, Mortimer RJ, Wilkinson F, Helv. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 2784–2795. [Google Scholar]
- [12].Juris A, Balzani V, Belser P, von Zelewsky A, Helv. Chim. Acta 1981, 64, 2175–2182. [Google Scholar]
- [13].Togni A, Jelier BJ, Tripet PF, Pietrasiak E, Franzoni I, Jeschke G, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl 2018, 10.1002/anie.201806296; Angew. Chem. 2018, 10.1002/ange.201806296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Umemoto T, Zhou M, Hu J, Faming Zhuanli Shenqing CN, 2015, 105017143 A 20151104. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


