ABSTRACT
Plants are exposed to various stress factors including biotic and abiotic stresses. Drought is a limiting factor that minimizes the development and growth of several plants in arid and semi-arid regions. Stress response is usually occur at different levels, Morphological, physiological and biochemical while at the molecular level a large number of genes are involved. This study aims at developing a new SSR primer for aquaporin related to drought stress in plants. A total of 177 complete coding sequences (CDS) available in the NCBI database are downloaded. After analyzing with BLAST, 163 sequences are selected. 1294 SSR derived from these sequences are characterized with MISA and indicating that all sequences contained SSRs. The most abundant SSR has been tetra-nucleotide repeat motif (36%) and among all the tetra-nucleotide repeats, the motif AAAG/CTTT was the most common type, whereas in tri-nucleotide, the motif CCG/CGG has been the predominate type. By using Primer3, 1120 primer pairs are generated and after analyzing, only 735 non redundant primer pairs that present the good characteristics are selected. Among them, some of the pairs of primers are randomly selected and validated on DNA of various species using PCR and agarose gel.
Keywords: drought, aquaporin, In silico, SSR(SimpleSequenceRepeat)-markers, primers
Introduction
Plants are exposed during their life-cycle to several environment stresses. Drought is one of the most abiotic stress factors that alters plants physiology, growth and the productivity of crop plants.1
Various responses to drought stress are suggested including tolerance strategies and complex survival that are capable of changing gene expression at the molecular level. Many alternatives are produced in protein synthesis, and therefore in their biological functions.2 Several genes have been already identified in various plants like, cereals, vegetables, and particularly in the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana L.3
Aquaporins are integral membrane proteins, which facilitates the passive movement of water through cells and play a crucial role in plant water relations.4-6 They have been shown to be involved in numerous physiological responses, particularly in water uptake and radial water transport.6-8 Responses of aquaporins to drought stress are very diverse and depend on the investigated species, tissue, subfamily, isoform, and the level of stress used in the study. Aquaporins are outstandingly involves to various abiotic stresses and a number of studies have been conducted regarding the impact of salinity, cold, and drought on these proteins.9-11 In olive (Olea europaea L.), two PIP (Plasma membrane Intrinsic Proteins) genes (OePIP1,1 OePIP2,1) and one TIP (Tonoplast Intrinsic Proteins) gene OeTIP1,1 showed a significant decrease at the transcript levels in leaves, roots, and twigs.12,13 In the root of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.), drought stress significantly reduced PIP transcript levels of two investigated genes, NtPIP1;1 and NtPIP2;1.11,14,15
Aquaporins (AQPs) belong to the great family of conserved proteins termed MIPs (Major Intrinsic Proteins), and they exhibit a high diversity in numerous organisms.16 In plants, the aquaporin family is particularly abundant and have a high diversity of isoforms.17 Based on the sequence homology and sub-cellular localization, the higher plant aquaporins have been divided in five main homologous subfamilies; PIPs (Plasma membrane Intrinsic Proteins), TIPs (Tonoplast Intrinsic Proteins), NIPs (Nodulin 26-like Intrinsic Proteins), SIPs (Small Intrinsic Proteins) and XIPs (X Intrinsic Proteins).18 All MIPs (Major Intrinsic Proteins)include two highly conserved NPA (Asn-Pro-Ala) motifs that play a crucial role in selective water conduction in aquaporin water channels.19
Recent developments in molecular biology have resulted in the development of molecular markers such as RAPD (Randomly Amplified polymorphic DNA),20 AFLP(Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism),21 SSR(Simple Sequence Repeat),22 ISSR (Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat),20 SRAP (Sequence Related Amplified Polymorphism),23 that are used in various studies like, genetic diversity, fingerprinting and elucidation of the genetic origin of various species. Due to their many advantages, including co-dominance, high polymorphism, relative abundance and reproducibility, efficiency and simplicity, SSR markers were considered relevant markers for several studies such as plant cultivar identification, genetic linkage map construction, genetic diversity analysis, and comparative genomics.24
Recently, the number of gene sequences as well as the complete genome of different plant species have increased significantly and are available online in various databases. In silico analysis of these sequences is crucial for the functional annotation of genes. In this context, the objectives of the present study are:
Identifying a large number of aquaporin genes associated with drought stress;
Comparing the abundance, distribution and dominant repeat motifs among SSR markers;
Developing a new set of SSR-primers from various species, and testing some of the primers designed on four DNA accessions using PCR and agarose gel.
This resource will help the researchers in obtaining experimental data for the tolerance of drought of a large species.
Results and discussion
Frequency and distribution of genic SSR
Based on the complete CDS (coding Sequence), a total of 163 nucleotide sequences of aquaporins candidate genes were retrieved. These sequences are divided into four sub-families (PIP1, PIP2, TIP1 and TIP2) for drought stress response in various species (woody and herbaceous) (Supplementary Table1). The aquaporin PIP2 is the most abundant sub-family with 32 and 34 sequences in the woody and herbaceous plants, followed by PIP1, TIP1 and TIP2 sub-families (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

The number and type of aquaporin sequence in different species.
Using a tool known as MISA (MIcroSAtellite), 1294 microsatellites were detected from 163 nucleic acid sequences (179696bp). Out of the 1294 microsatellites, 162 had more than SSR and 84 SSRs present in compound formation (Table 1). Single repeat types of SSR represented 94.7% and compound repeats represented 5.3%.
Table 1.
Results of microsatellite search.
| Total number of sequences examined | Total size of examined sequences (bp) | Total number of identified SSRs | Number of SSR containing sequences | Number of sequences containing more than 1 SSR | Number of SSRs present in compound formation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 163 | 179696 | 1294 | 163 | 162 | 84 |
In this study, a total of 1294 SSRs containing repeats from mono- to hexa-nucleotides, being 1210 SSRs single (94%) and 84 SSRs compound formation (6%) for all studied species. Due to their repeat compositions, all simple-sequence repeats identified have been classified (Figure 2). The tetra-nucleotide repeat were most abundant (466) and accounted for 36% of the total SSRs, followed by tri-nucleotide repeats 19% (242), penta-nucleotides 18% (229), hexa-nucleotides 15% (189), mono- and di-nucleotides represent successively 6% (73) and 1% (11).
Figure 2.

Frequency distribution of different SSR repeat type.
The frequency and abundance of different motif repeats have been reported to show variable and uneven distribution among different organisms. The predominant type in the present study has been tetra-nucleotide, similar to previous studies with other plants, including sugar cane and cucumber.25,26 However, this result is in contrast to earlier studies showing that type of motif repeats predominates in mushroom is mononucleotide,27 in citrus tri-nucleotide28 and in cotton penta-nucleotide.29 The variation of this predominance of repeat motifs can be explained by the source of the DNA sequences (EST, cDNA, or gene sequences) used in each study. The di-nucleotide repeats were also the most frequent class of SSR derived from genomic DNA of various species, including melon, bean, peanut and quinoa.30–34
Among the tri-nucleotide repeat units, CCG/CGG code which stands for proline and arginine, was the most abundant with frequency of 4.8% (67) followed by ACC/GGT code (60, 4.3%) which stands for threonine and glycine (Figure 3). These results are in line with the studies in Pyropia haitanensis wherein the GCC/CCG was the most common trinucleotide repeat, accounting for 60.07%.35 Parekh, Kumar, Zala, Fougat, Patel, Bosamia, Kulkarni and Parihar36 reported that AAG/CTT and ATC/ATG were the most common tri-nucleotide repeat in diploid cotton. Each triplet of nucleic acid describes a specific amino acid, which plays a crucial role in many cellular, biological, and metabolic processes in plants.37
Figure 3.

Types and frequency of most common repeat motifs.
Of the tetra-nucleotide, the motifs AAAG/CTTT, AAAC/GTTT, ACCC/GGGT and AAGT/ATTC were the most frequent with frequencies of 4.6% (63), 3.5% (48), 3.2% (44) and 3% (42), respectively (Figure 3, Table 2). For the same reason, AAAG and ACCC were the most common motif types detected in cucumber genomic data. For di-nucleotide repeats, AG/CT was the most frequent with 1% (9) (Figure 3). Similar results were reported for C. canephora, wherein AG/CT was the most common motifs.38 In monocots plants, the motifs CG/GC and CCG/CGG are the most abundant, whereas dicotyledonous plants have a low frequency.39,40 In 5ʹ and/or 3ʹ UTR (untranslated) regions, dinucleotide repeats are the most abundant but occasionally produce in coding regions.41 Parekh, Kumar, Zala, Fougat, Patel, Bosamia, Kulkarni and Parihar36 proposed that the generation of informative markers based on EST-SSR is made from long motif SSRs, like tetra-nucleotide repeat motif, which appeared to be polymorphic in their study.
Table 2.
Number and frequency of SSR from sequences of aquaporin gene.
| Class |
Nombre of repeats (n) |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repeats | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | > 10 | Total | % | |
| Mon-o-nucleotide | |||||||||||||
| A/T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | 67 | 78 | 5,6% | |
| Di-nucleotide | |||||||||||||
| AC/GT | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 2 | 0,1% | |
| AG/CT | - | - | - | - | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 1% | ||
| Tri-nucleotide | |||||||||||||
| AAC/GTT | - | 10 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | 0,8% | |
| AAG/CTT | - | 23 | 5 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 29 | 2,1% | |
| AAT/ATT | - | 4 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | 0,5% | |
| ACC/GGT | - | 57 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 60 | 4,3% | |
| ACG/CTG | - | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | 0,6% | |
| ACT/ATG | - | 11 | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | 1,2% | |
| AGC/CGT | - | 11 | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | 1,1% | ||
| AGG/CCT | - | 25 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 26 | 1,9% | |
| AGT/ATC | - | 20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 26 | 1,9% | |
| CCG/CGG | - | 64 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 67 | 4,8% | |
| Tetra-nucleotide | |||||||||||||
| AAAC/GTTT | 42 | 5 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 48 | 3,5% | |
| AAAG/CTTT | 60 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 63 | 4,6% | |
| AAAT/ATTT | 24 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 24 | 1,7% | |
| AACC/GGTT | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19 | 1,4% | |
| AACG/CTTG | 15 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | 1,3% | |
| AACT/ATTG | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | 0,9% | |
| AAGC/CGTT | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 14 | 1,0% | |
| AAGG/CCTT | 26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 26 | 1,9% | |
| AAGT/ATTC | 42 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 42 | 3,0% | |
| AATC/AGTT | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | 0,5% | |
| AATG/ACTT | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | 1,2% | |
| AATT/AATT | 17 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | 1,3% | |
| ACAG/CTGT | 21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 21 | 1,5% | |
| ACAT/ATGT | 20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | 1,4% | |
| ACCC/GGGT | 44 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 44 | 3,2% | |
| ACCG/CTGG | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | 0,6% | |
| ACCT/ATGG | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | 0,5% | |
| ACGC/CGTG | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | 0,6% | |
| ACGG/CCTG | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | 0,9% | |
| ACGT/ATGC | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 14 | 1,0% | |
| ACTC/AGTG | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | 0,7% | |
| ACTG/ACTG | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | 0,3% | |
| AGAT/ATCT | 7 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | 0,6% | |
| AGCC/CGGT | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | 1,1% | |
| AGCG/CGCT | 11 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | 0,9% | |
| AGCT/ATCG | 8 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | 0,7% | |
| AGGC/CCGT | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 0,2% | |
| AGGG/CCCT | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 0,4% | |
| AGGT/ATCC | 3 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | 0,3% | |
| AGTC/AGTC | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 0,2% | |
| CCCG/CGGG | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | 0,8% | |
| CCGG/CCGG | 16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 16 | 1,2% | |
| (Pentanucleotide)) | 269 | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 275 | 19,9% | |
| (Hexa-nucleotide)n) | 211 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 212 | 15,3% | |
| Total | 1004 | 257 | 25 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 69 | 1384 | ||
Design of SSR primers
The definition of primer pairs was made from the flanking sequences of SSRs. A total of 1120 primer pairs (for 85.8% of total SSR motifs) including the redundant were generated from the 1294 SSRs present in all sequences.
From the 1294 SSRs developed, there was a large proportion of primer pairs on tetra-nucleotide 37% (411), tri- nucleotide 19,9% (221), penta- nucleotide 18,9% (210) and hexa-nucleotide 16.1% (180) repeats, while compound (75), mono- (10) and di-nucleotide (5) repeats together represented less than 7% of the total primer pairs (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

Distribution of SSR primers including redundant.
In all 1120 primer pairs flanking the SSR repeat patterns, only non-redundant primer were analyzed by a free program online (Multiple Primer Analyzer). After analyzing, only 735 non-redundant primer pairs that present the good characteristics, which may open the possibilities for marker assisted selections. This molecular marker will be used for genetic studies such as identification and characterization genes associated with drought stress.
Further information on these 735 optimal SSR primer pairs designed for aquaporins is presented in Table 3, including primer sequence (forward and reverse) and their names, annealing temperature, % of CG, SSR repeat motifs, start and end of each primer and product size.
Table 3.
Primer pairs selected for amplification.
| Primer | Repeats | Forward primer (5ʹ−3ʹ) | Reverse primer (3ʹ−5ʹ) | Tm ºC | Product size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DT_1 | (TTTG) 2 | TGCTGAGGAAAAGAGCCATT | CATCCTCTTCCTTTCCCTCC | 53 | 102 |
| DT_2 | (TTGT) 2 | AAGAGCAGGGCTTAAGAGGG | CAAAGGTTGGAAACTGAAGCA | 54 | 139 |
| DT_3 | (GGGAGT)2 | GTCACCAACGGCCAGACTAC | AGACCAGTCCGAACGTCATC | 57 | 100 |
| DT_4 | (CCAG) 2 | GAGATCATCGGCACCTTTGT | GGCATGCTGCTTGTTGTAGA | 57 | 213 |
| DT_6 | (CCTT) 2 | CATGGTCGTTTTACAGGGCT | TAGAAAACCGCCCTTGTCAG | 53 | 262 |
| DT_8 | (GAAA)3 | TTTCGAGTATTCCAAAAACCTCA | GATTTCTTCACGGTTTCCGA | 53 | 119 |
Validation of the SSR primers
6 SSR primer pairs were selected, synthesized (Table 4), and tested by PCR on 3 genotypes of 4 species, Argan tree (Argania spinosa L.), Balanites (Balanites aegyptiaca L.), Wheat (Triticum æstivum L.), Shorgum (shorgum bicolor L.). After numerous optimizations of annealing temperature, all primers showed a generated right and reproducible amplified product.After numerous optimizations of annealing temperatures, DT_1, DT_2, DT_3, DT_4 and DT_6 primers showed a generated right and reproducible amplified product. For DT_8 no amplification was indicated. An example of amplification patterns obtained by DT_1 and DT_2 in different species was shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Band patterns amplified by SSR primers DT_1 and DT_2, on genomic DNA of 4 species. Lane M (Marker Molecular 1kp), Ba (Balanites aegyptiaca L.), Aa (Argania spinosa L.), Sb(Shorgum bicolor L.), Ta (Triticumæstivum L.), Lane NC (Negative Control).
Generally, SSRs are known by its specificity at locus and, therefore, it is expected that each amplification could yield one or two bands with SSR primer pair. However, in the present study, most of the primer pairs produced more than 2 bands. Generation of multiple bands can be explaining probably by duplication events in species genomes during its evolution history.42 This suggests the non-use of these primers for diversity studies. However, we can use them for the eventual detection of “aquaporin” expression gene polymorphism and highlight the transferability of these markers in related species.
Materials and methods
In Silico detection of aquaporin sequences
Full length aquaporin sequences from several species including woody and herbaceous plants, were obtained from Genbank database (National Center for Biotechnology Information, (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) which were analyzed using BLAST toolto eliminate similar and redundancy sequences.
SSR detection and development of primer pairs designing
The MISA (MIcroSAtellite) was used for detecting SSR in the aquaporin sequences based on criteria such as: minimum number of 2 repeats for tetra-,penta-, and hexa-nucleotide motifs, 3 repeats for tri- nucleotide motif, 6 repeats for di- nucleotide motif and 10 repeats for mono- nucleotide motif. The primers flanking SSRs were designed using the primer3 with length of 18–27 pb, annealing temperature of 57–61°C, and GC content from 26 to 67%. All primers designed were checked for desired characteristics like hairpin structure, primer dimer using oline tool, Multiple Primer Analyzer, ThermoFisher scientific (http://www.thermofisher.com/ma/en/home.html). The primers were named with prefix DAS (Drought_Aquaporin_SSR) followed by an order number.
Evaluation of the SSR markers
In order to test the effectiveness of the SSR, some primer pairs were selected for testing of DNA accession from 4 species. To validate the SSR markers, genomic DNA was extracted from young leaves using ISOLATE Plant Mini Kit (Bioline, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Standard PCR was carried out in a reaction volume of 25µl using MyTaqTM HS Mix (Bioline, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR amplification was performed by thermocycler gradient (Applied Biosystem ® Veriti ® Thermal Cycler) using the following profile: 95°C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, appropriate annealing temperature for 15 s, 72°C for 15 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 1 min. Amplified products were electro-phoresed in 1.5% agarose gel.
Conclusion
Here, we used a candidate gene approach to identify a set of SSR markers in plants genes for drought stress and design the primer pairs associated with the markers developed. A total of 1294 microsatellites in 163 complete CDSs (coding sequences) of aquaporins in many species were identified, indicating all of sequences containing SSRs. The most abundant SSR was tetra-nucleotide (36%) repeat motif, and among all the tetra-nucleotide repeats, the motif AAAG/CTTT (4.6%) was the most abundant type. A total of 735 SSR primers were designed and selected with good criteria. From all SSR primers identified, 6 pairs of primers were selected and validated on 4 accessions genomic DNA. Five primers were given positive and reproducible results with a multi-band profile. These primer pairs may potentially serve as a new molecular marker, including polymorphism search for genes expressed in different species and highlight the transferability of these markers in related species. Thus, they may be used as markers of aquaporin genes in tolerance studies to dehydration plants and can also be employed in functional studies to mark the level of gene expression of these genes in new species.
Acknowledgments
This work was realized in the framework of conducting the project ArganBiogen and funded by Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology (Morocco) and The Ministry of Higher Education, scientific Research and Professional Training Of Morocco.
Compliance with ethics requirements
It is declared that this article is in entire compliance with the research ethics.
Supplemental material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.
References
- 1.Harb A, Krishnan A, Ambavaram MMR, Pereira A, Molecular and physiological analysis of drought stress in arabidopsis reveals early responses leading to acclimation in plant growth. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:1254–1271. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.161752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bray EA, Classification of genes differentially expressed during water-deficit stress in Arabidopsis thaliana: an analysis using microarray and differential expression data. Ann Bot. 2002;89:803–811. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hanana M, Deluc L, Fouquet R, Daldoul S, Leon C, Barrieu F, Ghorbel A, Mliki A, Hamdi S, [Identification and characterization of “rd22” dehydration responsive gene in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)]. C R Biol. 2008;331:569–578. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Maurel C, Plant aquaporins: novel functions and regulation properties. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:2227–2236. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chaumont F, Moshelion M, Daniels MJ, Regulation of plant aquaporin activity. Biol Cell. 2005;97:749–764. doi: 10.1042/BC20040133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Knipfer T, Fricke W, Water uptake by seminal and adventitious roots in relation to whole-plant water flow in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J Exp Bot. 2011;62:717–733. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Javot H, Maurel C.. The role of aquaporins in root water uptake. Ann Bot. 2002;90:301–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hachez C, Zelazny E, Chaumont F, Modulating the expression of aquaporin genes in planta: a key to understand their physiological functions? Biochim Biophys Acta- Biomembranes. 2006;1758:1142–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jang JY, Kim DG, Kim YO, Kim JS, Kang H, An expression analysis of a gene family encoding plasma membrane aquaporins in response to abiotic stresses in arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 2004;54:713–725. doi: 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000040900.61345.a6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Galmés J, Pou A, Alsina MM, Tomàs M, Medrano H, Flexas J, Aquaporin expression in response to different water stress intensities and recovery in Richter-110 (Vitis sp.): relationship with ecophysiological status. Planta. 2007;226:671–681. doi: 10.1007/s00425-007-0515-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Alexandersson E, Fraysse L, Sjövall-Larsen S, Gustavsson S, Fellert M, Karlsson M, Johanson U, Kjellbom P, Whole gene family expression and drought stress regulation of aquaporins. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;59:469–484. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-0352-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Secchi F, Lovisolo C, Uehlein N, Kaldenhoff R, Schubert A, Isolation and functional characterization of three aquaporins from olive (Olea europaea L.). Planta. 2007;225:381–392. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0365-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Secchi F, Lovisolo C, Schubert A, Expression of OePIP2.1 aquaporin gene and water relations of Olea europaea twigs during drought stress and recovery. Ann Appl Biol. 2007;150:163–167. doi: 10.1111/aab.2007.150.issue-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mahdieh M, Mostajeran A, Horie T, Katsuhara M, Drought stress alters water relations and expression of PIP-type aquaporin genes in nicotiana tabacum plants. Plant Physiol. 2008;49:801–813. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcn054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ayadi M, Cavez D, Miled N, Chaumont F, Masmoudi K, Identification and characterization of two plasma membrane aquaporins in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum) and their role in abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2011;49:1029–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Venkatesh J, Yu J-W, Park SW, Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling of the Solanum tuberosum aquaporins. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013;73:392–404. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Maurel C, Verdoucq L, Luu D-T, Santoni V, Plant aquaporins: membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:595–624. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Alexandersson E, Danielson JA, Rade J, Moparthi VK, Fontes M, Kjellbom P, Johanson U, Transcriptional regulation of aquaporins in accessions of Arabidopsis in response to drought stress. Plant J. 2010;61:650–660. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04087.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Luu DT, Maurel C, Aquaporins in a challenging environment: molecular gears for adjusting plant water status. Plant Cell Environ. 2005;28:85–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01295.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tabin S, Kamili AN, Ganie SA, Zargar O, Sharma V, Gupta RC, Genetic diversity and population structure of Rheum species in Kashmir Himalaya based on ISSR markers. Flora. 2016;223:121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2016.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tarang A, Gashti AB, The power of microsatellite markers and AFLPs in revealing the genetic diversity of Hashemi aromatic rice from Iran. J Integr Agric. 2016;15:1186–1197. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61221-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu S, Yin X, Lu J, Liu C, Bi C, Zhu H, Shi Y, Zhang D, Wen D, Zheng J, et al, The first genetic linkage map of Ricinus communis L. based on genome-SSR markers. Ind Crops Prod. 2016;89:103–108. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yu C, Yin Y, Creech DL, Lu Z, Xu J, Morphological characters and SRAP analysis of two hybrids between Hibiscus dasycalyx and Hibiscus ‘Moy Grande’. Sci Hortic. 2016;198:118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang Y, Chen Y, Wang R, Zeng A, Deyholos MK, Shu J, Guo, H. Development of microsatellite markers derived from expressed sequence tags of polyporales for genetic diversity analysis of endangered polyporus umbellatus. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:941357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pinto LR, Oliveira KM, Ulian EC, Garcia AA, de Souza AP, Survey in the sugarcane expressed sequence tag database (SUCEST) for simple sequence repeats. Genome/National Research Council Canada = Genome/Conseil National De Recherches Canada. 2004;47:795–804. doi: 10.1139/g04-055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cavagnaro PF, Senalik DA, Yang L, Simon PW, Harkins TT, Kodira CD, Huang S, Weng Y. Genome-wide characterization of simple sequence repeats in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). BMC Genomics. 2010;11:1–18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sonah H, Deshmukh RK, Sharma A, Singh VP, Gupta DK, Gacche RN, Rana JC, Singh NK, Sharma TR, Xu Y, Genome-wide distribution and organization of microsatellites in plants: an insight into marker development in >brachypodium. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e21298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liu S-R, Li W-Y, Long D, Hu C-G, Zhang J-Z, Development and characterization of genomic and expressed SSRs in citrus by genome-wide analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e75149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zou C, Lu C, Zhang Y, Song G, Distribution and characterization of simple sequence repeats in Gossypium raimondii genome. Bioinformation. 2012;8:801–806. doi: 10.6026/97320630008801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jarvis DE, Kopp OR, Jellen EN, Mallory MA, Pattee J, Bonifacio A, Coleman CE, Stevens MR, Fairbanks DJ, Maughan PJ. Simple sequence repeat marker development and genetic mapping in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J Genet. 2008;87:39–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cuc LM, Mace ES, Crouch JH, Quang VD, Long TD, Varshney RK, Isolation and characterization of novel microsatellite markers and their application for diversity assessment in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8:1–11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bohnert HJ, Nelson DE, Jensen RG, Adaptations to environmental stresses. Plant Cell. 1995;7:1099–1111. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.7.1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ritschel PS, TCdL L, Tristan RL, Buso GSC, Buso JA, Ferreira ME, Development of microsatellite markers from an enriched genomic library for genetic analysis of melon (Cucumis meloL.). BMC Plant Biol. 2004;4:1–14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Benchimol LL, Campos Td, Carbonell SAM, Colombo CA, Chioratto AF, Formighieri EF, Gouvêa LR, LimaSouza AP. Structure of genetic diversity among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties of Mesoamerican and Andean origins using new developed microsatellite markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2007;54:1747–1762. doi: 10.1007/s10722-006-9184-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Xie C, Li B, Xu Y, Ji D, Chen C, Characterization of the global transcriptome for Pyropia haitanensis (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) and development of cSSR markers. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Parekh MJ, Kumar S, Zala HN, Fougat RS, Patel CB, Bosamia TC, Kulkarni KS, Parihar A, Development and validation of novel fiber relevant dbEST–SSR markers and their utility in revealing genetic diversity in diploid cotton (Gossypium herbaceum and G. arboreum). Ind Crops Prod. 2016;83:620–629. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kumari K, Muthamilarasan M, Misra G, Gupta S, Subramanian A, Parida SK, Chattopadhyay D, Prasad M, Jordan IK, Development of eSSR-markers in setaria italica and their applicability in studying genetic diversity, cross-transferability and comparative mapping in millet and non-millet species. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e67742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hendre PS, Aggarwal RK, Development of genic and genomic SSR markers of robusta coffee (Coffea canephora Pierre Ex A. Froehner). PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e113661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang Z, Yu G, Shi B, Wang X, Qiang H, Gao H, Development and characterization of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers based on RNA-sequencing of medicago sativa and in silico mapping onto the M truncatula genome. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e92029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang Z, Li J, Luo Z, Huang L, Chen X, Fang B, Li Y, Chen J, Zhang X. Characterization and development of EST-derived SSR markers in cultivated sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas). BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:139. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrells ME, Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hu J-B, Zhou X-Y, Li J-W. Development of novel EST-SSR markers for cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and their transferability to related species. Scientia Horticulturae. 2010;125:534–538. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
