Abstract
Plant functional groups (PFGs) have been increasingly introduced in land degradation (LD) studies; however, it is unclear whether PFGs can indicate LD. Here, we selected five different degraded lands (i.e., pristine and, lightly, moderately, seriously and extremely degraded) higher than 4650 m on the Tibetan Plateau. In addition, we investigated floristic metrics (i.e., composition, height, cover, biomass and abundance) and soil conditions (e.g., moisture, temperature and gravel ratio) by sampling 225 subplots. We found 75 vascular plants that consist of sedges (Cyperaceae), grasses (Gramineae), legumes, forbs, cushion plants and shrubs PFGs. LD dramatically deteriorated soil conditions, vegetation cover and productivity, however, improved species diversity. Moreover, cover and productivity showed a hump-shaped relationship with LD intensification in legumes, grasses and forbs and decreased mainly in sedges. Productivity increased considerably in cushion plants and shrubs on the extremely degraded land. Major characteristics of the LD process were the replacement of Kobresia spp. by Carex spp. in sedges; cushion plants significantly expanded, and shrubs appeared on the extremely degraded land. We, thus, confirm that the PFG variations are likely to indicate a LD process and demonstrate ways of using PFGs to assess LD status on the Tibetan Plateau.
Introduction
Land degradation (LD) is a global concern because of its greatly negative influence1–3. Long-term, unsustainable practices on marginal lands have intensified LD visibly, especially for the overgrazing regime on grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau, which is the highest (mean elevation of 4000 m) and largest (2.0 × 106 km2) plateau and is known as the Third Pole on the earth4,5. The degraded grasslands exceeded 5.0 × 105 km2 with an annual degradation rate of 8%6, and the alpine cold swamp/meadow declined over 36% sharply in just 15 years after 19907. Extreme LD has occurred over the past decades, reduced the biological or economical productive capacity and hindered regional development3,8. At the same time, the alpine meadow degradation has been a hot topic in ecological studies9–11. However, previous studies have focused on vegetation productivity or vegetated cover12,13, community species diversity14,15, or soil nutrients14,16,17 in degraded lands. Knowledge of the indicative plant functional group (PFG) in degraded alpine meadows is still rare2.
A PFG is considered to be a combination of species that possesses similar strategies to cope with similar environments18. Usually, plants in grassland communities are classified into sedges (Cyperaceae), grasses (Gramineae), forbs, vines, ferns or shrubs PFGs based on the plant growth form19. Evidence suggests that a PFG investigation is crucial for degraded grassland community structure or function research9,20, such as in a Siberian lowland tundra, where the shrubs (e.g., Betula nana), grasses (e.g., Arctagrostis latifolia), and sedges (e.g., Eriophorum spp.) cover ratio showed a close relationship with LD, resulting in thaw pond formation21. Yang et al. also found that not only the total number of vascular plants, but also the grasses or sedges cumulative density per unit area greatly decreased over the course of LD on the Tibetan Plateau22. Additionally, more detailed groups were established and studied due to special functions, such as nitrogen fixation of the legume PFG2. The legume PFGs promoted floral succession in degraded grasslands2,23, for example, Medicago sativa (legume) facilitated species recruitment and grassland productivity greatly24. However, Khan et al. argued that the facilitation of legumes was restricted by the dominant composition and habitat condition25. Moreover, among the extraordinary abundance of plant growth forms, cushion plants were noted early in alpine ecosystems, such as the Andes, Patagonia, Tierra del Fuego, New Zealand Alps, and in the Third Pole26. For over a century, cushion plants have fascinated many botanists and ecologists, such as Silene acaulis as a model species to explore cushion plant ecophysiology and population ecology27,28. However, cushion plants have rarely been separated from other PFGs and addressed as an individual PFG in previous studies29. Thus, some special PFGs have been ignored in previous studies, especially some unique PFGs in alpine ecosystems.
Here, we determine whether there is a consistent trend in all the well-founded PFGs in a certain alpine grassland in terms of their responses to the LD process. There has been no systematic, precise, or universal theory until now. In order to resolve these questions, we conducted a comprehensive investigation and PFG study during a LD process in the core area of the Tibetan Plateau. Moreover, we considered all the established PFGs based on the existing PFG division theory. With an ongoing effort to determine (1) the variations in PFG structure and aboveground productivity responses to a LD process filter and (2) whether such variations could indicate a LD process. Experimental sites were selected in an area undergoing a degradation process and the design followed a comprehensive ecological field experiment in the Tibetan Plateau alpine meadow region. A floristic composition investigation (identification, height, cover, abundance and aboveground biomass of vascular plants) was conducted, and the topsoil layer conditions (water content, temperature and gravel ratio) were measured.
Results
Floristic composition and soil condition variations during a LD process
Seventy-five vascular plant taxa distributed in 49 genera and 20 families of angiosperms were recorded in 225 subplots across the 5 communities (I = pristine land, II = lightly degraded land, III = moderately degraded land, IV = seriously degraded land and V = extremely degraded land) (Table S1). The γ-diversity from I to V was 23, 36, 34, 31 and 32, respectively. Similarly, the number of families and genera in I was less than that in the remnant communities. Furthermore, the mean α-diversity was the lowest in I (P < 0.05), increased from I to III and then decreased (Table 1). The floristic composition in sedges presented a qualitative change in that Kobresia spp. (e.g., K. humilis, K. tibetica, and K. royleana) were replaced by Carex spp. (e.g., C. montis-everestii and C. moorcroftii) from I to V. Kobresia spp. were the main dominant species in I and II, while Carex spp. (e.g., C. montis-everestii) and legumes (e.g., Astragalus confertus), grasses (e.g., Stipa purpurea), and forbs (e.g. Leontopodium nanum) were dominant in III, IV, and V. The sum of the importance values of Kobresia spp. decreased from 74.75 in I to 0 in V, while that of Carex spp. increased from 0 in I to 33.84 in V. Androsace tangulashanensis (cushion plant) was one of the top three dominant species in V (Table S1).
Table 1.
I | II | III | IV | V | DF | F-value | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gravel % (SE) | 0a | 0a | 18.45(1.40)b | 29.80(3.50)bd | 34.59(2.23)cd | 4,20 | 68.538 | <0.001 |
Moisture % (SE) | 61.02(2.89)a | 8.15(1.08)bc | 6.67(0.42)b | 5.06(0.27)bc | 4.24(0.35)bc | 4,20 | 935.938 | <0.001 |
Temp. ( C) (SE) | 9.21(0.27)a | 10.48(0.26)b | 13.10(0.34)c | 13.42(0.32)c | 15.46(0.38)d | 4,20 | 20.360 | <0.001 |
Slope (°) | <0.5° | <0.5° | <0.5° | <0.5° | <0.5° | — | — | — |
Altitude (m) | 4650 | 4656 | 4676 | 4680 | 4681 | — | — | — |
Vegetation cover % | 89.49(1.58)a | 74.73(1.93)b | 50.73(2.08)c | 30.33(1.64)d | 20.47(1.21)e | 4,20 | 311.213 | <0.001 |
Total biomass (g·m−2) | 122.70(8.54)a | 62.13(8.41)b | 35.60(2.28)c | 17.06(2.13)d | 17.77(2.01)d | 4,20 | 52.703 | <0.001 |
α-diversity (SE) | 16.80(0.86)a | 25.60(1.29)b | 30.00(0.45)c | 21.20(1.20)d | 24.60(0.51)b | 4,20 | 28.474 | <0.001 |
γ-diversity | 23 | 36 | 34 | 31 | 32 | — | — | — |
Families | 10 | 15 | 13 | 13 | 16 | — | — | — |
Genera | 18 | 30 | 26 | 25 | 23 | — | — | — |
The Jaccard index of total vascular plant composition in paired I–II, I–III, I–IV, and I–V decreased considerably (from 0.23 to 0.06), and the Jaccard index in paired II–III, II–IV, and II–V decreased from 0.37 to 0.19. In addition, II–IV (0.67) and III–V (0.41) presented higher similarity than the others, which indicated a community assembly transition during the LD process (Fig. 1).
The topsoil layer conditions presented notable variance. The gravel mass ratio and temperature increased greatly from I to V (P < 0.05), while the soil water content conversely declined markedly from I to V (P < 0.05) (Table 1).
LD influences PFG structure
The sedge and grass γ-diversity obviously decreased in V in comparison to the other communities, whereas the legume and forb γ-diversity was lowest in I. There were three cushion plant taxa in V but only one in the remaining communities, and shrubs were solely observed in V (Table 2). The vascular plant similarity of each PFG among the five communities showed dramatic differences, and III, IV, and V had no common sedge or legume plants with I. In addition, the only cushion plant in I (A. zambalensis) was not present in the remaining communities. The paired communities of III, IV, and V had a relatively higher Jaccard index in each PFG (Tables 2, S1).
Table 2.
PFGs | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sedges | Grasses | Cushion plants | Legumes | Forbs | Shrubs | |||
γ-diversity of PFGs | I | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 0 | |
II | 5 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 0 | ||
III | 3 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 17 | 0 | ||
IV | 3 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 0 | ||
V | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 1 | ||
Jaccard Index | I | II | 0.29 | 0.43 | — | 0.25 | 0.18 | — |
III | — | 0.43 | — | — | 0.07 | — | ||
IV | — | 0.33 | — | — | 0.04 | — | ||
V | — | 0.20 | — | — | 0.07 | — | ||
II | III | 0.33 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 0.27 | — | |
IV | 0.33 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.13 | 0.27 | — | ||
V | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.11 | 0.12 | — | ||
III | IV | 1.00 | 0.67 | 1.33 | 0.44 | 0.70 | — | |
V | 0.67 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 0.40 | — | ||
IV | V | 0.67 | 0.20 | 0.33 | 0.63 | 0.31 | — |
Different response patterns of PFG cover in response to the LD gradient were observed (Fig. 2; Table S3). The cover of forbs, grasses and legumes markedly increased from I to III and then decreased (Fig. 2a), which indicated a hump-shaped trend (Fig. 2b; Table S3). Shrubs appeared solely in V. The cushion plant cover increased remarkably in V (15.44% cover ratio) and occupied a critical position in V (e.g., the importance value of A. tangulashanensis was as high as 5.12) (Fig. 2a; Tables S1, S2, S4). The results showed that all the response models were nonlinear. The sedge cover showed a cubic relationship (R2 = 0.865, P < 0.05) that significantly decreased from I to IV but weakly increased in V (Fig. 2; Table S3).
LD influences PFG productivity
The cumulative percentage variance in the relationship between plant community and environmental factors was 66.5% on axis 1 in the Redundancy Analysis (RDA) (Fig. 3). Axis 1 mainly reflected the LD process (r = −0.94 for topsoil temperature, r = 0.85 for topsoil water content, and r = −0.92 for topsoil gravel mass ratio). Similar to the total vegetation cover, the sedge and total community aboveground biomasses were positively correlated with topsoil moisture, whereas the forb, legume, grass, cushion plant and shrub aboveground biomasses were negatively correlated with topsoil moisture but positively correlated with topsoil temperature and gravel mass ratio.
The general linear regression model showed substantially different contribution rates of each PFG to community productivity during the LD process. The productivity of I or II was based mainly on sedges (Fig. 4, P < 0.05; R2 = 0.955 in I and R2 = 0.914 in II), and legumes, grasses, sedges and forbs greatly contributed to the productivity of III (Fig. 4, P < 0.05; R2 = 0.557, 0.421, 0.482, and 0.185 for legumes, grasses, sedges and forbs, respectively). Moreover, the community productivity in V was mainly based on cushion plants (17.74% biomass ratio) and sedges (55.06% biomass ratio) (Fig. 4, P < 0.05; R2 = 0.448 and 0.246, respectively; Tables S2, S4).
Discussion
Vast variations, including floristic composition, PFG structure and productivity, among all the PFGs during the LD process were observed in our study. There was no general response trend of the different PFGs to the LD process, as in previous studies. However, there were some differences that cannot be ignored in contrast to previous studies, such as the dominant palatable sedges or grasses declined significantly or disappeared or was replaced by an unpalatable forb (e.g., Veratrum lobelianum) during the LD process in the headwaters of the Yellow River, Caucasus Mountains or Siberian lowland tundra21,30–32. In our study, however, the grasses and legumes did not directly decrease with the intensification of LD but increased from pristine land to moderately degraded land; forbs did not replace sedges in the degraded lands, though the key species in the alpine meadow in our study region, Kobresia spp. (sedges), disappeared in the degraded lands gradually, and some other vascular plants, Carex spp. belonging to the sedges, expanded rapidly. This dispersal strategy may closely correlate with the evolutionary processes of local adaptation and niche separation of sedges33. C. montis-everestii and C. moorcroftii are guerrilla-type rhizomatous sedges with high cold and barren area tolerance, an exploitation resource strategy, and less habitat-dependent plasticity34. The developed guerrilla rhizome competes for belowground resources in degraded lands35, whereas Kobresia spp. in our study area are characterized by a phalanx growth form with a resource-acquisitive strategy36. This differentiation will help improve the accuracy of research on PFG ecological strategies in alpine degraded ecosystems and suggests that more attention should be given to the specific ecological strategies of PFGs along ecogeographical gradients37.
The α-diversity was higher in the degraded lands, especially in the land which presented higher grass and legume cover compared to the species loss in the previous studies15,31. It may be that the graminoids or legumes could benefit the vegetation or soil and establish higher species abundance as in the Greater Caucasus2,38. Furthermore, specific reasons may also account for these differences. The pristine land presented as densely and highly vegetated areas which visually thick mattic epipedon underground, which hinders species invasion, ecesis, growth, and reproduction through intra-and interspecific competition. Thus, it led to lower population diversity and lower floristic composition similarity than the degraded lands10,39. In addition, the dwarf height of dominant (i.e., K. pygmaea) and track patches provided niches for the invasions, such as the accidental species Microula tibetica, Axyris prostrate, and Actinocarya tibetica and increased the total species richness in lightly degraded land10,38. The high gravel cover property, therefore, provided more niches for the cold xerophytic/mesophytic grasses, legumes, or forbs, such as Stipa purpurea, Roegneria thoroldiana, Oxytropis glacialis, or Cortiella caespitose, and resulted in higher species diversity40. Thus, this variation in degraded lands, in contrast to pristine land, might demonstrate restoration opportunities in such poorly vegetated areas2.
Shrubs (Myricaria prostrata) only appeared in the extremely degraded land in our study area. Moreover, in contrast to the high-frequency studies of sedges, grasses, legumes, and forbs ecological strategies in previous studies, the prominence cover ratio (15.44%) and productivity ratio (17.74%) of cushion plants in extremely degraded land attracted our attention. We hypothesized that shrub appearance and the substantial expansion of cushion plants may indicate severe LD. These plants act as preservers of ecosystem function in the fragile and extremely degraded alpine region due to their efficient trapping of heat and water26. Hence, they were able to cope with the severely degraded land and serve as important ecosystem engineers in the alpine ecosystems39,41,42. Acting as nurse plant species, their expansion may support other plant growth within their tightly knit canopies and present a visible vegetated landscape in severely degraded land43–45. This species expansion may contribute to higher species diversity in extremely degraded land as they are a long-lived PFG46. More specifically, this expansion may also demonstrate the indicator function of cushion plants and shrubs for severe LD on the alpine plateau.
Finally, we found that PFG variations may indicate a LD process on the alpine grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau. Our results showed that LD increased vascular plant diversity but deteriorated community productivity, cover and soil conditions. The ongoing intensified LD was accompanied by sedges assembly replacement of Kobresia spp. by Carex spp. and sedges cover and productivity declined as a whole. The cover and productivity of forbs, grasses and legumes showed a hump-shaped trend with LD intensification. Shrub and cushion plants expanded greatly in the extremely degraded land. This study may provide research recommendations and methods for exploring LD by a PFG analysis.
Materials and Methods
Study area
The field experiment was performed at the Tibetan Plateau Research Base of the State Key Laboratory of Permafrost Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences (34°49′16.5″–34°49′44.9″N, 92°55′14.6″–92°56′35.4″E; 4650 m a.s.l) (Fig. 5). The research base is located in the Three River source region, which has a typical plateau alpine climate with a mean annual temperature and precipitation of −3.8 °C and 290 mm, respectively. Precipitation mainly falls in the vegetation growing season (May to October)47. In general, there is a frozen period every year (September to the next April)48. Human-induced degradation, such as the overgrazing regime, was the primary cause of degradation in the grassland, and there were approximately 15.41 million sheep units in the Three River source region (approximately 0.36 million km2) during the year 2003–201249,50. The grassland is grazed by yaks, Bos grunniens, and sheep, Ovis aries, in the summer season48. Vegetation damage caused by yaks or sheep grazing, and Tibetan herdsmen activities can be observed in this area. The vegetation cover ranges from less than 10% to more than 90%, presenting different types of degraded landscapes38,51. The study area is dominated by a typical alpine swamp meadow, the climatic climax in this region, with cold-adapted mesophytic perennial herbs, such as Kobresia tibetica, K. humilis and K. pygmaea. The degraded grassland landscape (alpine cold steppe or alpine desert) also occupies a large area. The alpine cold steppe mainly consists of xeric grasses, such as Stipa purpurea and Littledalea racemosa. The alpine desert is dominated by xerophyte or drought-enduring plants, such as Leontopodium nanum and Saussurea arenaria52.
Experimental design
A comprehensive field experiment was designed based on a field investigation in our study area. Five different degraded alpine communities, I = pristine land, II = lightly degraded land, III = moderately degraded land, IV = seriously degraded land and V = extremely degraded land (thereafter, I, II, III, IV, and V), were characterized by combining the preliminary fieldwork investigation with the previous studies in this area31,51,53 (Fig. 5). Then, we investigated the floristic composition and topsoil condition. I is alpine swamp meadow that has the highest vegetation cover in the study area; II is an alpine meadow with relatively high vegetation cover but lower than I visually; III is an alpine steppe landscape that has a relatively high soil bareness ratio; in addition, IV and V are typical alpine desert landscapes, of which V has the highest bareness degree (see the colour photos shown in Fig. 5).
Five experimental plots (5 m × 45 m) were established in each community with a regular pattern. In addition, nine subplots (1 m × 1 m) were arranged in each plot, so that there were 45 subplots in each community9,31,38. The resulting data analysed in this study consisted of 225 subplots distributed across 25 plots (Fig. 5).
Floristic composition investigation and PFG classification
The investigation was conducted during the growing season. Within each subplot, all vascular plant taxa were recorded. Botanical nomenclature followed “Flora of China” (http://foc.eflora.cn/). The number of vascular plants was counted in each subplot, and the number of monocotyledons was counted by the ramets. Average plant height was measured by a ruler separately for each species in all subplots. The cover of vegetation and plant populations in each subplot was estimated by visual inspection based on the previous study2. Thirty subplots in I, III, IV, and V and five in II (for which the community was relatively homogeneous) were selected randomly to harvest the aboveground biomass by cutting the plants close to the ground after the composition investigation. All harvested plants were dried at 65 °C until they reached a constant weight47,48.
Six PFGs were considered: sedges (namely, Cyperaceae plants), grasses (namely, Gramineae plants), legumes (namely, Leguminosae plants), cushion plants (we selected spongy cushion plants that are typical cushion plants to research)26, forbs (the rest of herbaceous plants), and shrubs. We regarded grasses and sedges as separate groups rather than a general graminoid group because of the predominance of sedges in the alpine meadow in this study region.
Soil condition data collection
At the same time as the floristic composition investigation, we monitored the topsoil (depth of 10 cm) temperature using iButton Hygrochron temperature logger (DS1923) at all 25 plots. Nine topsoil samples were sampled randomly by a hand shovel to obtain the gravel accurately in each plot and pooled as a soil mixture sample (approximately 500 g). Thus, a total of 25 soil mixture samples were collected from 225 samples. Approximately 50 g (2 mm) soil was sieved quickly from it to measure the topsoil water content using the gravimetric method by drying samples at 105 °C8. The remnant soil was air-dried for seven days and sieved to obtain gravel (>2 mm). All plant litters or roots were removed and weighed to calculate the gravel mass ratio38. To eliminate weather influence (e.g., rainfall and temperature) on soil moisture, we collected soil samples in five communities as soon as possible on a sunny day.
Statistical analysis
Vascular plant diversity was presented based on the α-diversity (defined as species richness of a single plot) and γ-diversity (defined as the total species richness of 5 plots in each community)54–56.
The floristic composition data from each community were simplified to calculate the importance value (IV) of each vascular plant using the following equation (Equation 1):
1 |
where RC, RH, and RD represent the relative cover, relative height and relative density of the species, respectively.
The floristic composition similarity between communities and PFGs was tested using the Jaccard index57 (Equation 2):
2 |
where j is the number of common vascular plants in paired communities, and a and b are the number of vascular plants in paired communities.
Because different plant communities and soil conditions were observed in the different degraded lands, analysis of variance (ANOVA) with least significant difference (LSD) (for equal variances) or Dunnett’s T3 (for unequal variances) based on the F-statistic was used to test the significance of species diversity, vegetation cover, total biomass, PFGs cover and biomass, and topsoil conditions during the LD process (P < 0.05, IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 for Windows)2,58. A redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to assess the effects of topsoil conditions on plant community characteristics as described previously based on the data in each plot (Canoco for Windows 4.5)2. The plant data were log transformed, centred and standardized when they were subjected to the RDA59.
General linear regression analysis was performed to test the strength of the relationship between the total aboveground biomass and the PFG aboveground biomass in each community. Models that described PFG cover responses to degradation status were calculated, and the best-fitting model was selected based on the coefficient of determination R2 (ranging from 0 to 1)60. Because some of the PFG variables contained zero values, log transformation could not be applied. Therefore, we tested the linear, logarithmic, inverse, quadratic, and cubic models. The figures were created with OriginPro 2016 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, US) and combined by Adobe Photoshop CS6 v6.0.335.0.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by the Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Welfare (No. 201504401).
Author Contributions
J.L. conducted the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote and revised the manuscript; J.Z., Y.L. and J.Y. assisted with writing and revising the manuscript; J.Z. and X.L. helped design the experiment and data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to an ongoing further study but can be requested from the corresponding author.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-36028-5.
References
- 1.Symeonakis E, Karathanasis N, Koukoulas S, Panagopoulos G. Monitoring sensitivity to land degradation and desertification with the environmentally sensitive area index: the case of Lesvos Island. Land Degrad. Develop. 2014;27:1562–1573. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2285. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hu G, Liu H, Yin Y, Song Z. The role of Legumes in plant community succession of degraded grasslands in northern China. Land Degrad. Develop. 2016;27:366–372. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bryan BA, et al. China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature. 2018;559:193–204. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0280-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang Y, et al. Storage, patterns and controls of soil organic carbon in the Tibetan grasslands. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2008;14:1592–1599. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01591.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hua LM, Squires VR. Managing China’s pastoral lands: current problems and future prospects. Land Use Policy. 2015;43:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fassnacht FE, Li L, Fritz A. Mapping degraded grassland on the Eastern Tibetan Plateau with multi-temporal Landsat 8 data-where do the severely degraded areas occur? Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2015;42:115–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2015.06.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang G, Li Y, Wu Q, Wang Y. Impacts of permafrost changes on alpine ecosystem in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Sci. China Series D: Earth Sci. 2006;49:1156–1169. doi: 10.1007/s11430-006-1156-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu Y, Wu G, Ding L, Tian F, Shi Z. Diversity-productivity trade-off during converting cropland to perennial grassland in the semi–arid areas of China. Land Degrad. Develop. 2016;28:699–707. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2561. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xu X, et al. Response of aboveground biomass and diversity to nitrogen addition along a degradation gradient in the Inner Mongolian steppe, China. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:10284. doi: 10.1038/srep10284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dorji T, Moe SR, Klein JA, Wang S, Totland Ø. Performance of two alpine plant species along environmental gradients in an alpine meadow ecosystem in central Tibet. Ecol. Res. 2016;31:417–426. doi: 10.1007/s11284-016-1350-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lafortezza R, Chen JQ. The provision of ecosystem services in response to global change: evidences and applications. Environ. Res. 2016;147:576–579. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kwon, H. Y. et al. Global estimates of the impacts of grassland degradation on livestock productivity from 2001 to 2011. In Nkonya, E., Mirzabaev, A., von Braun, J. (eds) Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement-A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development. (Springer, Cham 197–214, 2016).
- 13.Lehnert LW, Meyer H, Meyer N, Reudenbach C, Bendix J. A hyperspectral indicator system for rangeland degradation on the Tibetan Plateau: A case study towards spaceborne monitoring. Ecol. Indic. 2014;39:54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hoppe F, Zhusui Kyzy T, Usupbaev A, Schickhoff U. Rangeland degradation assessment in Kyrgyzstan: vegetation and soils as indicators of grazing pressure in Naryn Oblast. J. Mt. Sci. 2016;13:1567–1583. doi: 10.1007/s11629-016-3915-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ombega NJ, Mureithi SM, Koech OK, Gacgebe CKK. Effect of rangeland rehabilitation on the herbaceous species composition and diversity in Suswa catchment, Narok County, Kenya. Ecol. Process. 2017;6:241. doi: 10.1186/s13717-017-0109-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Darwish T, Fadel A. Mapping of soil organic carbon stock in the Arab countries to mitigate land degradation. Arab. J. Geosci. 2017;10:474. doi: 10.1007/s12517-017-3267-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tóth G, Hermann T, da Silva MR, Montanarella L. Monitoring soil for sustainable development and land degradation neutrality. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018;190:57. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6415-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Koyanagi T, et al. Grassland plant functional groups exhibit distinct time-lags in response to historical landscape change. Plant Ecol. 2012;213:327–338. doi: 10.1007/s11258-011-9979-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.van der Walt L, Cilliers SS, Du Toit MJ, Kellner K. Conservation of fragmented grasslands as part of the urban green infrastructure: how important are species diversity, functional diversity and landscape functionality? Urban Ecosyst. 2015;18:87–113. doi: 10.1007/s11252-014-0393-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bengtsson J. Which species? What kind of diversity? Which ecosystem function? Some problems in studies of relations between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Appl. Soil Ecol. 1998;10:191–199. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(98)00120-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li B, et al. Thaw pond development and initial vegetation succession in experimental plots at a Siberian lowland tundra site. Plant Soil. 2017;420:147–162. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3369-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang Z, Gao J, Zhao L, Xu X, Ouyang H. Linking thaw depth with soil moisture and plant community composition: effects of permafrost degradation on alpine ecosystems on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Plant Soil. 2013;367:687–700. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1511-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lin L, et al. Principal component analysis on alpine Kobresia humilis meadow degradation succession in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Chin. J. Grassl. 2012;34:24–30. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li Q, Song Y, Li G, Wang P, Zhou D. Grass-legume mixtures impact soil N, species recruitment, and productivity in temperate steppe grassland. Plant Soil. 2015;394:271–285. doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2525-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Khan MASA, Grant K, Beierkuhnlein C, Kreyling J, Jentsch A. Climatic extremes lead to species-specific legume facilitation in an experimental temperate grassland. Plant Soil. 2014;379:161–175. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2050-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Serge A, Florian B, Sébastien L, Julien R, Philippe C. 1914-2014: a revised worldwide catalogue of cushion plants 100 years after Hauri and Schröter. Alp. Bot. 2014;124:59–70. doi: 10.1007/s00035-014-0127-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Molenda O, Reid A, Lortie CJ. The alpine cushion plant Silene acaulis as foundation species: a bug’s-eye view to facilitation and microclimate. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ferrarini, A., Alsafran, M. H. S. A., Dai, J. & Alatalo, J. M. Improving niche projections of plant species under climate change: Silene acaulis on the British Isles as a case study. Clim. Dyn. 1–11 (2018).
- 29.Moradi H, Attar F, Oldeland J. Plant functional type approach for a functional interpretation of altitudinal vegetation zones in the Alborz Mts., Iran. J. Mt. Sci. 2017;14:2257. doi: 10.1007/s11629-016-4285-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang CT, Long RJ, Wang QL, Jing ZC, Shi JJ. Changes in plant diversity, biomass and soil C, in alpine meadows at different degradation stages in the headwater region of three rivers, China. Land Degrad. Develop. 2009;20:187–198. doi: 10.1002/ldr.879. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang X, Dong S, Yang B, Li Y, Su X. The effects of grassland degradation on plant diversity, primary productivity, and soil fertility in the alpine region of Asia’s headwaters. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014;186:6903–6917. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3898-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Callaway RM, Kikvidze Z, Kokodze D. Facilitation by unpalatable weeds may conserve plant diversity in overgrazed meadows in the Caucasus Mountains. Oikos. 2000;89:275–282. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890208.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Choler P, Erschbamer B, Tribsch A, Gielly L, Taberlet P. Genetic introgression as a potential to widen a species’ niche: Insights from alpine Carex curvula. PNAS. 2004;101:171–176. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2237235100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.He Z, et al. Do clonal growth form and habitat origin affect resource-induced plasticity in Tibetan alpine herbs? Flora. 2007;202:408–416. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2006.08.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Song M, et al. Interactions of plant species mediated plant competition for inorganic nitrogen with soil microorganisms in an alpine meadow. Plant Soil. 2007;297:127–137. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9326-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Klimešová J, Doležal J, Dvorský M, de Bello F, Klimeš L. Clonal growth forms in Eastern Ladakh, Western Himalayas: classification and habitat preferences. Folia Geobot. 2011;46:191–217. doi: 10.1007/s12224-010-9076-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Oliver TH, et al. Declining resilience of ecosystem functions under biodiversity loss. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:10122. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wiesmair M, Otte A, Waldhardt R. Relationships between plant diversity, vegetation cover, and site conditions: implications for grassland conservation in the Greater Caucasus. Biodivers. Conserv. 2017;26:273–291. doi: 10.1007/s10531-016-1240-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sholto-Douglas C, Shackleton CM, Ruwanza S, Dold T. The effects of expansive shrubs on plant species richness and soils in semi–arid communal lands, South Africa. Land Degrad. Develop. 2017;28:2191–2206. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2745. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Segatto ALA, Reck-Kortmann M, Turchetto C, Freitas LB. Multiple markers, niche modelling, and bioregions analyses to evaluate the genetic diversity of a plant species complex. BMC. Evol. Biol. 2017;17:234. doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-1084-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wirth LR, et al. Effects of floral neighborhood on seed set and degree of outbreeding in a high-alpine cushion plant. Oecologia. 2011;167:427–434. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-1985-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mihoč MAK, et al. Soil under nurse plants is always better than outside: a survey on soil amelioration by a complete guild of nurse plants across a long environmental gradient. Plant Soil. 2016;408:31–41. doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-2908-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shumway SW. Facilitative effects of a sand dune shrub on species growing beneath the shrub canopy. Oecologia. 2000;124:138–148. doi: 10.1007/s004420050033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reid AM, Lamarque LJ, Lortie CJ. A systematic review of the recent ecological literature on cushion plants: champions of plant facilitation. Web Ecol. 2010;10:44–49. doi: 10.5194/we-10-44-2010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.García Lino MC, Cavieres LA, Zotz G, Bader MY. Carbohydrate reserves in the facilitator cushion plant Laretia acaulis suggest carbon limitation at high elevation and no negative effects of beneficiary plants. Oecologia. 2017;183:997. doi: 10.1007/s00442-017-3840-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cavieres LA, Hernández-Fuentes C, Sierra-Almeida A, Kikvidze Z. Facilitation among plants as an insurance policy for diversity in Alpine communities. Functional Ecology. 2016;30:52–59. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12545. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Peng F, Xue X, You Q, Zhou X, Wang T. Warming effects on carbon release in a permafrost area of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015;73:57–66. doi: 10.1007/s12665-014-3394-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Xu M, et al. Effects of warming and clipping on plant and soil properties of an alpine meadow in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. J. Arid Land. 2015;7:189–204. doi: 10.1007/s40333-014-0010-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cai HY, Yang XH, Xu XL. Human-induced grassland degradation/restoration in the central Tibetan Plateau: the effects of ecological protection and restoration projects. Ecol. Eng. 2015;83:112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.06.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhang Y, et al. Quantitative assessment of relative role of climate change and human activities on grassland net primary productivity in the Three-River Source Region, China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica. 2017;26:1–14. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gao Q, et al. Grassland degradation in Northern Tibet based on remote sensing data. J. Geogr. Sci. 2006;16:165–173. doi: 10.1007/s11442-006-0204-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shi C, et al. Climate warming alters nitrogen dynamics and total non-structural carbohydrate accumulations of perennial herbs of distinctive functional groups during the plant senescence in autumn in an alpine meadow of the Tibetan Plateau, China. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 2015;200:21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.09.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Xue X, Guo J, Han B, Sun Q, Liu L. The effect of climate warming and permafrost thaw on desertification in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Geomorphology. 2009;108:182–190. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kraft NJB, et al. Disentangling the drivers of β diversity along latitudinal and elevational gradients. Science. 2011;333:1755. doi: 10.1126/science.1208584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhu X, Shen Y, He B, Zhao Z. Humus soil as a critical driver of flora conversion on karst rock outcrops. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:12611. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13060-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Whittaker RH. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon. 1972;21:213–251. doi: 10.2307/1218190. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jaccard P. The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol. 1912;11:37–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wang HT, et al. Changes in land use driven by urbanization impact nitrogen cycling and the microbial community composition in soils. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:44049. doi: 10.1038/srep44049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Machado RAR, McClure M, Hervé MR, Baldwin IT, Erb M. Benefits of jasmonate-dependent defences against herbivores in nature. eLife. 2016;5:e13720. doi: 10.7554/eLife.13720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2013;4:133–142. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to an ongoing further study but can be requested from the corresponding author.