Skip to main content
Eurosurveillance logoLink to Eurosurveillance
. 2018 Nov 29;23(48):1800622. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.48.1800622

HIV in Europe and Central Asia: progress in 2018 towards meeting the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets

Alison E Brown 1,2, Rosalie Hayes 3, Teymur Noori 4, Yusef Azad 3, Andrew J Amato-Gauci 4, Anastasia Pharris 4, Valerie C Delpech 1,5; the ECDC Dublin Declaration Monitoring Network6
PMCID: PMC6280419  PMID: 30621820

Abstract

In 2018, 52 of 55 European and Central Asian countries reported data against the UNAIDS 90–90–90 targets. Overall, 80% of people living with HIV (PLHIV) were diagnosed, of whom 64% received treatment and 86% treated were virally suppressed. Subregional outcomes varied: West (87%–91%–93%), Centre (83%–73%–75%) and East (76%–46%–78%). Overall, 43% of all PLHIV were virally suppressed; intensive efforts are needed to meet the 2020 target of 73%.

Keywords: HIV, Continuum of HIV Care, Europe and Central Asia, UNAIDS targets


In 2014, the Joint United National Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) established the global 90–90–90 targets. The aim was for 90% of all people living with HIV (PLHIV) to be diagnosed, 90% of those diagnosed to receive antiretroviral treatment (ART) and 90% of those receiving treatment to achieve viral suppression, by 2020 [1]. Here, we describe progress towards the UNAIDS 90–90–90 targets across Europe and Central Asia and discuss whether current performance is sufficient to eliminate HIV transmission.

The Dublin Declaration on Partnership to Fight HIV/AIDS

Between January and March 2018, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) disseminated an online survey to the 55 countries of Europe and Central Asia that comprise the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region, to monitor the implementation of the Dublin Declaration on Partnership to Fight HIV/AIDS [2]. Countries provided estimates of the number and proportion of people within a defined four-stage continuum of care for the most recent year available (Box) [3,4].

Four-stage continuum of HIV care, global UNAIDS 90-90-90 target and substantive target.

Stage 1: Estimated number of people living with HIV

Stage 2: Number/percentage of stage 1 diagnosed

Stage 3: Number/percentage of stage 2 receiving ART

Stage 4: Number/percentage of stage 3 with viral load < 200 copies/mL (considered as virally suppressed)

• Global UNAIDS 90-90-90 target:

First 90: Number/percentage of all PLHIV who are diagnosed

Second 90: Number/percentage of those diagnosed who are treated

Third 90: Number/percentage of those treated who are virally suppressed

• Substantive target:

Number/percentage of all PLHIV who are virally suppressed.

ART: antiretroviral therapy; PLHIV: people living with HIV.

Source: Gourlay et al [4]

Countries also specified the year to which the estimates related, data sources and collection methods and uncertainty bounds for each continuum stage. Where necessary, data were supplemented using Global AIDS Monitoring (GAM) indicators collected by UNAIDS. Data were validated by countries between May and November 2018 and updated accordingly.

Definitions and analyses

The global 90–90–90 targets are assessed as percentages of each previous stage of the continuum. The ‘substantive target’ is defined as the percentage of all PLHIV who are virally suppressed, making 73% the target (Figure 1). The global targets include countries reporting at least two consecutive stages but the substantive target only includes countries reporting all four stages of the continuum. Data were presented by WHO European subregion (West, Centre and East) which categorises countries in Europe and Central Asia in to three geographic areas by HIV epidemic type [5]. At the (sub)regional level, analyses were undertaken after summing each continuum stage across countries [3]. Data were compared with that previously submitted through the Dublin Declaration survey [3,6,7].

Figure 1.

The continuum of HIV care as envisaged by the 90–90–90 UNAIDS targets by 2020

ART: antiretroviral therapy; PLHIV: people living with HIV; UNAIDS: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.

Global 90-90-90 target: each stage of the continuum is presented as a percentage of the previous stage of the continuum, with target of 90%–90%-90%.

Substantive target: each stage of the continuum is presented as a percentage of the total number of people living with HIV, with target of 90%–81%-73%.

Numbers of PLHIV are rounded to the nearest hundred and reported only where available.

Graph is adapted from [1].

Figure 1

Key findings

In 2018, 52 of 55 countries completed the survey with 34 providing data across all four continuum stages (compared with 29 in 2016) and 42 providing at least two consecutive stages (compared with 41 in 2016). In 2018, progress towards the global 90–90–90 targets in Europe and Central Asia stands at 80%–64%–86%. In the West subregion, 87%–91%–93% was achieved with equivalent figures at 83%–73%–75% and 76%–46%–78% in the Centre and East, respectively. In countries in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA), which includes countries from each of the subregions, the progress stands at 86%–91%–92%. The number and proportion in each continuum stage are presented in the Table.

Table. Progress against the global 90–90–90 targets reported, European and Central Asian countries, 2018 (n = 52).

WHO subregion Country Total numbers Global 90–90–90 Targets Substantive Target
All PLHIV Diagnosed Treated Virally suppressed % of PLHIV who are diagnosed % of diagnosed PLHIV who are receiving ART % receiving ART who are virally suppressed % of PLHIV who are virally suppressed
2020 target: 90% 2020 target: 90% 2020 target: 90% 2020 target: 73%
West
(n=23 countries)
Andorra NA 68 68 NA NA 100 NA NA
Austria 7,079 6,537 6,145 5,223 92 94 85 74
Belgium 18,758 15,885 13,763 12,759 85 87 93 68
Denmark 6,000 5,500 5,300 5,200 92 96 98 87
Finland 3,880 3,401 NA NA 88 NA NA NA
France 156,600 132,400 120,700 116,600 85 91 97 74
Germany 86,100 74,800 68,800 65,500 87 92 95 76
Greece 16,665 13,866 9,594 NA 83 69 NA NA
Iceland NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Ireland 7,205 6,276 5,227 4,986 87 83 95 69
Israel 8,039 7,448 5,087 NA 93 68 NA NA
Italy 130,000 114,400 100,000 87,000 88 87 87 67
Liechtenstein NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Luxembourg 1,081 919 812 751 85 88 92 69
Malta 453 340 340 298 75 100 88 66
Monaco 47 47 47 47 100 100 100 100
The Netherlands 22,900 20,264 18,599 17,580 88 92 95 77
Norway NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Portugal 38,959 35,709 31,000 28,007 92 87 90 72
Spain 146,000 120,000 116,408 103,000 82 97 88 71
Sweden 8,320 7,489 7,261 6,930 90 97 95 83
Switzerland 16,600 15,000 14,400 13,900 90 96 97 84
United Kingdom 101,400 91,987 88,089 85,446 91 96 97 84
West totala 776,086 672,336 611,640 553,227 87 91 93 74
Centre
(n=15 countries)
Albania 1,300 891 568 312 69 64 55 24
Bulgaria 2,862 2,410 1,198 689 84 50 58 24
Croatia 1,533 1,077 919 822 70 85 89 54
Cyprus NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Czech Republic 3,230 2,533 1,800 1,660 78 71 92 51
Hungary NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Kosovo* NA NA NA 15 NA NA NA NA
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, 383 246 198 191 64 80 96 50
Montenegro 437 201 140 121 46 70 86 28
Poland NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Romania 17,000 15,009 11,570 8,409 88 77 73 49
Serbia 2,700 2,441 1,724 NA 90 71 NA NA
Slovakia 995 756 540 NA 76 71 NA NA
Slovenia 987 670 533 530 68 80 99 54
Turkey NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Centre totala 31,427 26,234 19,190 12,749 83 73 75 46
East
(n=14 countries)
Armenia 3,400 2,265 1,530 1,304 67 68 85 38
Azerbaijan 8,003 5,661 4,207 1,778 71 74 42 22
Belarus 26,120 19,231 11,242 7,253 74 58 65 28
Estonia 7,900 NA 4,109 NA NA NA NA NA
Georgia 10,500 5,090 4,144 3,383 48 81 82 32
Kazakhstan 26,000 20,841 11,482 6,338 80 55 55 24
Kyrgyzstan 8,500 5,805 3,237 1,995 68 56 62 23
Latvia NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Lithuania 2,761 2,601 780 609 94 30 78 22
Moldova 15,132 11,887 5,162 3,324 79 43 64 22
Russia 998,525 808,823 319,613 27,1671 81 40 85 27
Tajikistan 15,000 7516 4,942 NA 50 66 NA NA
Ukraine 244,000 136,378 98,237 57,010 56 72 58 23
Uzbekistan NA 21,364 20,281 17,530 NA 95 86 NA
East totala 1,365,841 1,047,462 488,966 372,195 76 46 78 26
Totala 2,173,354 1,746,032 1,119,796 938,171 80 64 86 43

ART: antiretroviral therapy; NA: Not available; PLHIV: people living with HIV; WHO: World Health Organization.

a Totals reflect sum of values presented. However only countries with data for consecutive stages of the continuum are included in the global 90–90–90 target outcomes and only countries with all four elements are included in substantive target outcome.

* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSC 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

Overall, 43% (n = 920,600/2,118,200) of all PLHIV were virally suppressed (in the 34 countries providing data on all stages of the continuum) (Figure 2). The substantive target was exceeded in the West subregion with 74% (n = 553,200/747,500) of all PLHIV virally suppressed compared with 46% (n = 12,700/27,700) and 26% (n = 354,700/1,342,900) in the Centre and East respectively. In the 20 countries of the EU/EEA that provided data, 73% (n = 552,000/759,200) of all PLHIV were virally supressed.

Figure 2.

Continuum of HIV care (substantive target), overall and by WHO subregion, 2018, and comparison between 2018 and 2016a,b

ART: antiretroviral therapy; PLHIV: people living with HIV; WHO: World Health Organization.

a Countries reporting data for both years included: West: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom; Centre: Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Montenegro, Romania; East: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Moldova.

b Countries providing data for both years.

Figure 2

For countries that provided data for both years (n = 25), performance can be compared between 2016 and 2018 (Figure 2); outcomes improved from 82%–85%–89% to 85%–89%–91% for the global targets, respectively. Overall 69% of all PLHIV were virally suppressed in 2018 compared with 62% in 2016. Improvements in the substantive targets were observed in all subregions (the 1% decline in percentage diagnosed in the Centre subregion is likely due to a revision of the estimate of undiagnosed PLHIV). Viral suppression among all PLHIV was 74% (West), 45% (Centre) and 25% (East) in 2018, compared with 67%, 34% and 16% in 2016, respectively.

The number of people with transmissible levels of virus can be calculated by adding the number of PLHIV estimated to be undiagnosed, diagnosed but untreated and treated but not virally suppressed (for countries providing all four stages. An estimated 57% (1.2 million/2.1 million) PLHIV are presumed to have transmissible levels of virus in 2018. Of which, an estimated 36% were undiagnosed, 51% were diagnosed but untreated and 13% were treated but had unsuppressed viral load (Figure 3). By subregion, 16% of people with presumed transmissible levels of virus lived in the West, 1% in the Centre and 83% in the East. Excluding Russia (which constituted 60% of all PLHIV with transmissible levels of virus in the entire Region) the figures become 41%, 3% and 56%, respectively.

Figure 3.

Distribution of people with transmissible levels of virus, by WHO subregiona, and Europe and Central Asia overall, 2018

WHO: World Health Organization.

a Countries reporting all four stages of the continuum.

Figure 3

Discussion

There has been substantial progress towards achieving the global UNAIDS targets across Europe and Central Asia and improvements have been recognised across all three WHO subregions. Despite this, only two-fifths of all PLHIV across the Region are estimated to be virally suppressed in 2018. While the West subregion exceeded the 73% substantive target, only around a half (Centre) and a quarter (East) of PLHIV are virally suppressed. The substantial progress between 2016 and 2018 is indicative of the improvements that can be made on a Regional scale in a short amount of time; this should provide reassurance and incentive to other global Regions that still have much work in order to meet the 90–90–90 ambition [8].

Each country should assess its progress against 90–90–90 targets and compare outcomes against Regional performance to drive further improvement. Only 34 of 55 countries provided data on all four continuum stages. Improved data availability is crucial to better monitor the effectiveness of their public health response to HIV. Countries that are unable to monitor the continuum of care need support to develop the infrastructure and data flows to enable them to do so.

Improvements in ART access are likely to have positively influenced the outcomes. Four countries recommended ART initiation regardless of CD4+ cell count (‘test and treat’) in 2014, 16 in 2016 and 14 in 2018. Treatment coverage among the diagnosed population was 89% for countries implementing ‘test and treat’ in 2014, 93% in 2016 and 46% in 2018. This, together with the significant variation in outcomes across countries and subregions (including those with similar contexts and epidemics) demonstrates the powerful impact of policy implementation. The substantial drop-off between the percentages diagnosed and treated in the East subregion is concerning since it enables preventable deaths, serious illness and onward transmission.

Characterising the population living with transmissible virus provides new insight into the scale and focus of prevention efforts. Almost two-thirds of the 1.2 million people with transmissible virus across the Region are diagnosed. This indicates that the biggest public health impact could be achieved through rapid and sustained scale up of treatment, particularly in the Centre and East subregions. Across the Region, the large undiagnosed population can be addressed by diversifying and augmenting policies offering HIV tests: for indicator conditions, during screenings for other sexually transmitted infections, in community-based settings, as self/home-testing and for partner notification. New European guidance on setting-based approaches for HIV and hepatitis testing can help countries implement more effective testing programmes [9].

It is unclear whether current progress has impacted on HIV transmission. Recent modelling suggests a viral suppression rate of 90% among all PLHIV must be reached to reduce incidence [10]. This indicates intensive efforts are required before transmission begins to fall. However, the West subregion, which has met the substantive target, has provided a favourable context in which reductions in HIV transmission are apparent among gay and bisexual men in some settings [11-14]. It is likely further declines will be observed when pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is fully implemented to those most at need.

The 90–90–90 targets remain a powerful tool to assess progress towards HIV elimination and drive standards in care for PLHIV. However, they cannot provide a comprehensive picture of the public health response to HIV. While testing and treatment access are a clear focus, deaths and key interventions such as condom use, PrEP and health promotion are excluded. Results are limited in their representativeness, since only 34 countries provided information for all four stages of the continuum with only 25 providing data for both 2016 and 2018. Furthermore, while continuum methods have been defined, in practice, variations in data availability, sources, timeframes and analysis (such as ability to account for deaths and loss-to-follow-ups) limit direct comparisons. Stage 1 of the continuum is, by necessity, an estimation. It is the part of the continuum that is simultaneously most vulnerable to uncertainty and the most critical since it sets the denominator upon which the 90–90–90 targets are calculated [4]. The estimated number of PLHIV (including number with transmissible virus) underrepresents the true Regional situation since they are presented only where countries report data.

A major limitation is that percentage values mask absolute numbers of PLHIV. We recommend that assessment of the 90–90–90 targets must incorporate the number of PLHIV. The analysis of the estimated number of people living with transmissible levels of virus provides further insights. For instance, the high proportion of people with transmissible virus is exacerbated by the large size of the Russian and Ukrainian epidemic. Furthermore, in the United Kingdom, France and Germany, the proportion of people with transmissible HIV is low but masks significant absolute numbers, which impedes efforts to reduce HIV incidence. It is also important to ascertain outcomes for key populations which are known to experience stark inequalities within and between countries [15].

It is crucial not to rest content with meeting the 90–90–90 targets. Each ‘last 10 percent’ includes people especially marginalised from healthcare services. Beyond the 90–90–90 ambition, intensive efforts in policy and service implementation are vital if the ultimate aim of ‘getting to zero’ is to become reality.

*This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSC 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.

ECDC Dublin Declaration Monitoring Network: Roland Bani (Albania), Jennifer Fernández Garcia (Andorra), Samvel Grigoryan, Arshak Papoyan, Trdat Grigoryan (Armenia), Irene Kaszoni-Rueckerl, Bernhard Benka (Austria), Esmira Almammadova (Azerbaijan), Inna Karaban, Anna Rusanovich, Svetlana Sergeenko (Belarus), Daniel Reynders, Andre Sasse, Dominique Van Beckhoven (Belgium), Tonka Varleva, Mariya Zamfirova (Bulgaria), Josip Begovac, Tatjana Nemeth-Blazic, Zoran Dominkovic (Croatia), Linos Hadjihannas, Anna Demetriou (Cyprus), Veronika Mičulková, Marek Malý (Czech Republic), Jan Fouchard, Susan Cowan (Denmark), Kristi Rüütel, Tiina Drell (Estonia), Henrikki Brummer-Korvenkontio, Kirsi Liitsola (Finland), Jean-Christophe Comboroure. Florence Lot (France), Ketevan Stvilia, Nikoloz Chkhartishvili (Georgia), Gesa Kupfer, Ulrich Marcus, (Germany), Vasilios Raftopoulos, Sotirios Tsiodras, Dimitra Parasekva (Greece), Katalin Szalay, Maria Dudas (Hungary), Guðrún Sigmundsdóttir (Iceland), Caroline Hurley, Derval Igoe, Kate O’Donnell (Ireland), Daniel Chemtob, Yana Levin (Israel), Anna Caraglia, Francesco Maraglino, Barbara Suligoi, Lella Cosmaro (Italy), Bayserkin Baurzhan Satzhanovich, Irina Ivanova Petrenko (Kazakhstan), Laura Shehu, Pashk Buzhala (Kosovo*), Ulan Kadyrbekov, Aybek Bekbolotov (Kyrgyzstan), Šarlote Konova, Liva Gramatina (Latvia), Irma Caplinskiene (Lithuania), Andrea Leibold, Marina Jamnicki Abegg (Liechtenstein), Patrick Hoffmann, Carole Devaux, Pierre Weicherding (Luxembourg), Jackie Maistre Melillo, Tanya Melillo (Malta), Iurie Climasevschi, Igor Condrat (Moldova), Dominique De Furst (Monaco), Aleksandra Marjanovic, Alma Cicic (Montenegro), Silke David, Ashna Nakched, Eline Op De Coul, Ard van Sighem (Netherlands), Arild Johan Myrberg, Karl Kristian Bekeng (Norway), Iwona Wawer, Piotr Wysocki (Poland), Isabel Aldir, Teresa Melo, Helena Cortes Martins (Portugal), Mariana Mardarescu, Adrian Streinu-Cercel (Romania), Danijela Simic, Sladjana Baros (Serbia), Jan Mikas, Peter Truska (Slovakia), Irena Klavs (Slovenia), Olivia Castillo, Begoña Rodríguez Ortiz de Salazar, Asuncion Diaz (Spain), Maria Axelsson, Gabriella Hok (Sweden), Stefan Enggist, Axel J. Schmidt (Switzerland), Sayfuddin Karimov, Dilshod Sayburhonov (Tajikistan), Emel Özdemir Şahin, Ayla Aydin (Turkey), Valerie Delpech, Peter Kirwan, Alison Brown, Sara Croxford (United Kingdom), Ihor Kuzin, Violeta Martsynovska, Olga Varetska (Ukraine), Gulufar Normuratova, Nurmat Atabekov (Uzbekistan)

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Authors’ contributions: AB, RH, YA, AP, AA, TN and VD were all involved in developing the survey questions related to the continuum of care. Country-specific analyses were undertaken by country members of the Dublin Declaration Monitoring Network. European analyses were undertaken by AB and RH under the supervision of AP, YA, VD and TN. AB and RH undertook the main writing of the manuscript which was reviewed and revised by AP, AA, VD, YA, TN and the Dublin Declaration Monitoring Network. All authors reviewed and approved the final draft.

References


Articles from Eurosurveillance are provided here courtesy of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

RESOURCES