Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2018 Oct 24;25(35):35657–35671. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3455-3

Steam activation of waste biomass: highly microporous carbon, optimization of bisphenol A, and diuron adsorption by response surface methodology

Mohamed Zbair 1,2,, Kaisu Ainassaari 2, Zouhair El Assal 2, Satu Ojala 2, Nadia El Ouahedy 1, Riitta L Keiski 2, Mohammed Bensitel 1, Rachid Brahmi 1
PMCID: PMC6280859  PMID: 30353441

Abstract

Highly microporous carbons were prepared from argan nut shell (ANS) using steam activation method. The carbons prepared (ANS@H2O-30, ANS@H2O-90, and ANS@H2O-120) were characterized using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared, nitrogen adsorption, total X-ray fluorescence, and temperature-programmed desorption (TPD). The ANS@H2O-120 was found to have a high surface area of 2853 m2/g. The adsorption of bisphenol A and diuron on ANS@H2O-120 was investigated. The isotherm data were fitted using Langmuir and Freundlich models. Langmuir isotherm model presented the best fit to the experimental data suggesting micropore filling of ANS@H2O-120. The ANS@H2O-120 adsorbent demonstrated high monolayer adsorption capacity of 1408 and 1087 mg/g for bisphenol A and diuron, respectively. The efficiency of the adsorption was linked to the porous structure and to the availability of the surface adsorption sites on ANS@H2O-120. Response surface method was used to optimize the removal efficiency of bisphenol A and diuron on ANS@H2O-120 from aqueous solution.

Graphical abstract.

Graphical abstract

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11356-018-3455-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Microporous carbon, Steam activation, Adsorption, Bisphenol A, Diuron, Response surface method

Introduction

The production of porous carbon materials needed a suitable porous carbon matrix from organic materials. Generally, porous carbon materials are prepared by the chemical or physical procedure. The chemical activation is conventionally carried out simultaneously with the carbonization step in the presence of oxidation catalysts, such as phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, potassium sulfide, zinc chloride, copper salts, or potassium hydroxide (Fierro et al. 2007; Bulgariu et al. 2011; Sayʇili et al. 2015; Bădescu et al. 2018; Zbair et al. 2018a, b). The raw material is impregnated with one of these chemical agents and then heated under an inert atmosphere between 400 and 700 °C (Sayğılı and Güzel 2018). Physical activation consists of oxidation of the coal at high temperature (700 to 1000 °C) using a weakly oxidizing agent. The gaseous reactants mainly used are air, carbon dioxide, and steam (Kilpimaa et al. 2015; Rezma et al. 2017).

These procedures lead to the development of porous structure in the micropore range (below 2 nm) with a relatively small development of mesopores (2–50 nm). Physical activation process permits to obtain carbons with narrower pore size distributions (Prauchner and Rodríguez-Reinoso 2012). However, chemical activation leads to carbons with a higher fraction of mesopores (Prauchner and Rodríguez-Reinoso 2012). Nevertheless, chemically activated carbons (ACs) generally retain traces of the activating agent responsible for surface oxidation (phosphorus, sulfur, zinc, copper, potassium).

Nowadays, there is a great interest in the development of feasible, inexpensive, high capacity, highly microporous sorbents for toxic metals, organic pollutants, CO2 capture, and also can be used as supercapacitor (Ello et al. 2013; Maneerung et al. 2016; Eftekhari 2018; Zbair et al. 2018b). In addition, the pore building of carbon material is the main parameter for adsorption of toxic metals and organic contaminants. AC predominantly consists of micropores (< 2 nm in size); accordingly, adsorption of small molecules, such as low-substituted monoaromatics, can be facilitated by the micropore-filling effect once the molecular size of the adsorbate is close to the pore size of the adsorbent (Ismadji and Bhatia 2001; Nakagawa et al. 2004; Fu et al. 2011). Moreover, steam activation shows various advantages, such as high adsorption capacity, which is mainly attributed to its high surface area and the abundance of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups (-OH and -COOH) (Bouchelta et al. 2008; Maneerung et al. 2016). In addition, Maneerung et al. (2016) found that AC prepared by steam activation has higher surface area (microporous materials) with high adsorption capacity of rhodamine B as compared to those obtained from CO2 and N2 activations (Maneerung et al. 2016).

Depending on the biomass source and activation conditions, the specific area differs from ∼ 500 to 2000 m2/g and the micropore volume from 0.2 to 0.9 cm3/g (Mohamed et al. 2010). Among several biomass sources, argan nut shell (ANS) was used in our previous study as raw material to produce AC via chemical activation, and the results show high surface area (1372 m2/g) with highest adsorption capacity (1250 mg/g) of bisphenol A (BPA) compared to the literature (Zbair et al. 2018b). Nevertheless, the production of AC from the ANS by physical activation using steam has not been studied. So, it appears to us pertinent to study this activation procedure in more detail, which is more promising to preserve the environment since no chemical reagents are used.

BPA and diuron were selected as model pollutants. This choice was motivated, on the one hand, by their harmful nature for the environment and, on the other hand, by the ease of their dosage in water. In addition, they possess various functional chemical groups.

BPA attracts comprehensive attention because of its extensive use as a monomer in the manufacture of polycarbonates, epoxy resins, and other plastics (Wang et al. 2017a). BPA has been broadly identified in wastewater, groundwater, surface water, and even drinking water (Lane et al. 2015; Lee et al. 2015). Recent studies have shown that it has a potential hormonal activity, which can induce hormonal disruption in an intact organism and as such he is called an “endocrine disruptor” (Bhatnagar and Anastopoulos 2017; Zbair et al. 2018b). However, its environmental impact is poorly documented and the alternatives to BPA are not yet industrialized, which is why this molecule has caught our attention.

On another hand, the herbicide diuron (N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N,N-dimethylurea) is broadly used in cultivation, and its existence in surface and groundwater has consequently augmented (Field et al. 2003; Claver et al. 2006). According to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), diuron was categorized as a “known/likely” carcinogen since 1997 (Liu et al. 2010). Some environmental actions about diuron have been stated, for instance, photolysis (Djebbar et al. 2008), soil degradation (Inoue et al. 2008), and hydrolysis (Feng et al. 2008). Also, the outcomes revealed that diuron was quite stable in water and not sensitive to light. Mainly, the degradation of diuron in soil was very slow. Dores’s investigation (Dores et al. 2009) indicated that diuron was identified in concentration diminishing until 70 days after application in runoff water and soil, totalizing 13.9% through the whole sampling period. Because of its high persistence, groundwater contamination by diuron has become a serious problem (Imache et al. 2008). Adsorption on solid surfaces is an important approach for monitoring the existence of organic contaminants in water. Carbon materials have been suggested as adsorbents to remove hazardous contaminants from polluted waters. ACs are inexpensive materials; they are commonly applied in several fields as adsorbents for toxic metals ions and organic pollutants (Bulgariu et al. 2011; Lin et al. 2013; Anastopoulos et al. 2017, 2018; Zbair et al. 2018a, b).

The goal of this study is then to prepare carbon material from ANS that is abundant Moroccan by-products using steam activation method. The chemical and textural properties of these carbon materials were determined, using different analysis techniques, to highlight their influence on the performance of the carbon in BPA and diuron adsorption. In addition, the response surface method (RSM) was used to get a more systematic view of the adsorption process.

Experimental section

Materials and methods

Detailed information on preparation, characterization methods, adsorption experiments, and regeneration protocol is described in the Supporting information.

Response surface method

The RSM was used to optimize the adsorption of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120. Three main parameters (X1: pH, X2: concentration, and X3: contact time) influencing the adsorption of BPA and diuron onto ANS@H2O-120 were chosen for experimental design (Anfar et al. 2017). For the three parameters studied, the design was elaborated using 2k factorial design experiments (k = 3), six axial point, and three central points (de Sales et al. 2013). The effects of independent factors on adsorption process were analyzed using a quadratic Eq. (1) as given below: where Y, a0, ai, aij, and aii are the predicted response, constant, linear, interaction, and quadratic coefficients, respectively. Xi and Xj are the coded values for the experimental parameters. The levels of the operational parameters and results are given in Table 2S.

Y=a0+i=1kaiXi+i=1kaiiXi2+i1k1j1kaijXiXj 1

Results and discussion

Characteristics of prepared carbon materials

The diffractograms of ANS@H2O-30, ANS@H2O-90, and ANS@H2O-120 shown in Fig. 1a highlight the presence of broad peaks around 23° and 43°, attributed to Bragg reflections (002) and (100) of amorphous carbon (Hadoun et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2017b). The sharp peak observed at 26.3° for ANS@H2O-120 is assigned to the graphitic plane (002) in agreement with JCPDS 00-75-2078. This result is very interesting, and it clearly shows that for thermal treatments greater than or equal to 2 h, the formation of graphite carbon is favored and its proportion would probably increase with the increase of the duration of the treatment or increase of the temperature (Sivachidambaram et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2017b).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a X-ray diffractograms. b Adsorption isotherms. c Pore size distributions. d FTIR spectra of ANS@H2O-30, ANS@H2O-90, and ANS@H2O-120

The adsorption isotherms of ANS@H2O-30, ANS@H2O-90, and ANS@H2O-120 shown in Fig. 1b, c are all type I, reflecting their microporous characters (Sing et al. 1985). The greatest specific surface area is obtained for the sample ANS@H2O-120 (2853 m2/g). Moreover, it is clearly established that the specific surface area and the pore volume increase with the duration of the heat treatment (Table 1). Indeed, a longer residence time allows the steam to react with the entire surface better and improves the creation and development of new pores, resulting in an increase in specific surface area and pore volume.

Table 1.

Textural properties of microporous carbons

Microporous carbons BET surface area (m2/g) Langmuir surface area (m2/g) Total pore volume (cm3/g) Average pore diameter (nm)
ANS@H2O-30 1417 1364 1.56 1.85
ANS@H2O-90 1838 1775 2.01 1.84
ANS@H2O-120 2853 2100 2.83 1.70

Infrared spectroscopy was used for the identification of functional groups present on the surface of the ANS@H2O-30, ANS@H2O-90, and ANS@H2O-120. These groups are often responsible for the adsorbent-adsorbate bonds (Ricordel et al. 2001). The FTIR spectra shown in Fig. 1d reveal the presence of the absorption bands located at 3428 cm−1 corresponding to the hydrogen stretching vibrations of the hydroxyl groups O-H. The spectra also show the presence of the band at 1652 cm−1 of the C=C bond stretching vibrations of the aromatic rings (Bouchelta et al. 2008; Zbair et al. 2018b) The FTIR band at 586 cm−1 is attributed to the deformation of aromatic C-H bonds (Ji et al. 2007).

The surface analysis of ANS@H2O-30, ANS@H2O-90, and ANS@H2O-120 by scanning electron microscope (Fig. 2) shows the evolution of morphology with the activation time of the heat treatment. Thus, the surface of the ANS@H2O-120 develops a more developed porous structure than those of the ANS@H2O-30 and ANS@H2O-90 samples, which is in perfect agreement with its larger surface area. The textural properties of ANS@H2O-120 are favorable for good adsorption performance of organic pollutants.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

SEM images of samples ANS@H2O-30, ANS@H2O-90, and ANS@H2O-120

Temperature-programmed desorptions (TPD) of CO2 and NH3 were performed to determine the amount and the strength of basic and acid sites of ANS@H2O-30, ANS@H2O-90, and ANS@H2O-120. The CO2-TPD profiles showed the peaks in the temperature range 50–140, 140–300, and superior to 300 °C are representing desorption of CO2 from weak, medium, and strong basic sites (Cho et al. 2005). Generally, the carbonaceous materials obtained from biomass have plenty of hydroxyl groups (-OH), which can react with CO2 (Meng et al. 2006). As shown, in Fig. 3a, the profile of all microporous materials shows one peak between 50 to 170 °C, related to the existence of the low amount of weak basic sites. Furthermore, the peaks observed between ∼ 170 to 300 °C for all microporous materials suggest the presence of medium basic sites. The strong basic sites were observed for all the samples, but the ANS@H2O-120 sample exhibited a higher amount of basic sites than the other samples. This result shows that increasing the time of activation from 30 to 120 min influenced in the strength and quantity of the basic sites (Fig. 3b) giving the material improved basic character after 120 min of treatment.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a Temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of CO2. b Amount of different basic sites

The NH3-TPD profiles of ANS@H2O-30, ANS@H2O-90, and ANS@H2O-120 are shown in Fig. 4a. Low, medium, and strong acid sites are observed in the temperature range of 100–250, 250–400, and superior to 400 °C, respectively (Arena et al. 1998; El Assal et al. 2017). ANS@H2O-30 and ANS@H2O-90 samples were presenting almost similar desorption profiles with only two small peaks. The maxima of the first and second peak were located around 140 and 300 °C. These peaks are corresponding to the presence of weak and medium acid sites. Furthermore, ANS@H2O-90 contained only the very small amount of strong acid sites compared to the other materials (Fig. 4b). The third sample ANS@H2O-120 had weak, medium, and strong acid sites presented by the peaks with maxima observed in the interval of temperature between 100 and 250, 250 and 400, and superior to 400 °C, respectively. The latter sample is presenting more acidic sites followed by ANS@H2O-90 and finally ANS@H2O-30, which is presenting the lowest amount of acid sites. The CO2 and NH3 TPD analyses demonstrate that the time of activation treatment is influencing both: strength and quantity of acidity and basicity.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

a Temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of NH3. b Amounts of different acid sites

The elemental compositions of ANS@H2O-30, ANS@H2O-90, and ANS@H2O-120 were analyzed with X-ray fluorescence and the results obtained are collected in Table 2. These results highlight the presence of a large number of elements with high concentrations in the ANS. The physical activation leads to a decrease and even to a disappearance of certain elements, in particular when increasing the time of the physical activation during the preparation. Taking Al as an example, the concentration was 142 mg/kg and after 30 min of steam activation was decreased to 92 mg/kg, then to 77 mg/kg (90 min of activation) and finally at 120 min the Al was disappeared totally, which may be attributed to the thermal treatment during the preparation.

Table 2.

Elemental composition of ANS, ANS@H2O-30, ANS@H2O-90, and ANS@H2O-120

Elements ANS (mg/kg) ANS@H2O-30 (mg/kg) ANS@H2O-90 (mg/kg) ANS@H2O-120 (mg/kg)
Al 142 92 77
Mg 214
P 562 398 320 141
S 288 120 21 9
Cl 663 451 98 9
K 1771 954 168 162
Na 25,427 16,950 14,990 14,530
Ca 1524 314 250 58
Mn 6 3 2 0.78
Fe 186 47 35 23
Cu 2 0.9 0.7 0.24
Zn 7 6 2 2
As 0.43 0.2
Br 2 1 1 0.5

BPA and diuron removal by microporous carbons

Preliminary adsorption tests were carried out to find out the BPA and diuron removal proficiencies onto ANS@H2O-30, ANS@H2O-90, and ANS@H2O-120. From Fig. 5, we conclude that ANS@H2O-120 had a higher adsorption efficiency for BPA and diuron than ANS@H2O-30 and ANS@H2O-90. This can be explained by the higher specific surface area of ANS@H2O-120 compared to that of ANS@H2O-30 and ANS@H2O-90 (Table 1). Hereafter, the further adsorption experiments were performed to evaluate and investigate the BPA and diuron adsorption characteristics on ANS@H2O-120 only.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Results of the preliminary adsorption of BPA and diuron by ANS@H20-30, ANS@H20-90, and ANS@H20-120 (BPA: C0 = 60 mg/L; diuron: C0 = 40 mg/L; m = 0.01 g; agitation speed = 200 rpm)

Effect of pH

The effect of pH of the solution on the adsorption performance of ANS@H2O-120 was studied by varying the pH between 2.0 and 12.0. It was observed that the adsorption of BPA on ANS@H2O-120 reaches a maximum in acidic medium, up to pH = 6.5, corresponding to a yield close to 99% (Fig. 6a). Above 6.5, the adsorption efficiency decreases with increasing pH. Indeed, the surface of ANS@H2O-120 has a net positive charge for pH lower than its pHPZC (6.5) and a net negative charge beyond pHPZC (Fig. 6b), whereas BPA is under its neutral form for a pH lower than 8 (Bautista-Toledo et al. 2005) and deprotonation (mono-anion of bisphenolate) becomes significant around pH = 8 (Sui et al. 2011). As a result, the decrease in adsorption efficiency observed at very high pH values results from repulsive electrostatic interactions between the negatively charged ANS@H2O-120 surface and the bisphenolate anion (Bautista-Toledo et al. 2005; Tsai et al. 2006). In the case of diuron, the percentage of adsorption ANS@H2O-120 (Fig. 6a) remains stable between pH = 6.69 and pH = 12.0 corresponding to a yield of 99% and decreases below pH = 6.69. Indeed, diuron acts as a cationic species at pH < 6.69 and as a neutral molecule with a pH greater than 6 (Fontecha-Cámara et al. 2007). On the other hand, the surface of ANS@H2O-120 is positively charged for a pH lower than the pHPZC. Therefore, for a lower pH, repulsive electrostatic interactions between the surface of ANS@H2O-120 and diuron, both positively charged, decrease the efficiency of adsorption. At a pH = 6.69, the diuron molecule and the surface of ANS@H2O-120 are both neutral, which favors non-electrostatic interactions, leading to increased adsorption efficiency. At higher pH, the diuron molecule is neutral while the surface of ANS@H2O-120 is negative, which does not favor electrostatic interactions and therefore maintains the relatively constant diuron adsorption rate (Fontecha-Cámara et al. 2007).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

a Effect of pH on adsorption of BPA and diuron. b Determination of the point of zero charge for ANS@H20-120

Adsorption kinetics

The adsorption kinetic studies of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120 were carried out by varying the contact time from 0 to 180 min. Approximately, 10 mg of ANS@H2O-120 was added to 100 mL of aqueous solution (i.e., BPA or diuron) with an initial concentration of 60 mg/L for BPA and 40 mg/L for diuron. Then, the mixture was stirred at room temperature.

The outcomes obtained (Fig. 7a) display that the adsorption rate is very fast and that the adsorption reaches the maximum after 15 min of solid/liquid contact, reaching the adsorption of 1200 mg/g corresponding to 99.98% removal of BPA and 809 mg/g, equivalent to 99.88% removal of diuron.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

a Effect of contact time. b Pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order-models. c Intraparticle diffusion model

The experimental results of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120 were fitted using nonlinear pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models (Fig. 7b). The kinetic parameters are gathered in Table 3. The best kinetic model established for the adsorption is chosen according to the value of the correlation coefficient (R2), which must be as close as possible to 1. According to Table 3, the both models have correlation coefficients close to the unity (R2 = 0.999) for both adsorbates. However, the quantities of molecules (BPA and Diuron) adsorbed on ANS@H2O-120 at equilibrium are very close to those calculated by the pseudo-second-order model compared to pseudo-first-order model. This indicates that the pseudo-second-order model describes best the kinetics of adsorption of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120.

Table 3.

Kinetic adsorption parameters of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120

Q e,exp
(mg/g)
Pseudo-first-order Pseudo-second-order
Q e,cal
(mg/g)
K 1
(1/min)
R 2 Q e,cal
(mg/g)
K 2
(g/mg min)
R 2
BPA 1200 1192 0.62 0.999 1199 0.004 0.999
Diuron 809 806 0.73 0.999 809 0.010 0.999

The intraparticle diffusion model was used to describe the mechanism of BPA and diuron transfer to the surface of ANS@H2O-120. As it can be seen from Fig. 7c, the intraparticle diffusion model shows that the adsorption process takes place in two stages (Weber and Morris 1963):

  • (i)

    The first step is the diffusion of the BPA and diuron into the outer surface of ANS@H2O-120;

  • (ii)

    The second stage is attributed to intraparticle diffusion and adsorption equilibrium (AL-Othman et al. 2012; Suresh et al. 2011).

Adsorption isotherms and thermodynamics

The Langmuir and Freundlich models were applied to the experimental data obtained from adsorption of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120 (Fig. 8a, b). The adsorption parameters at equilibrium are collated in Table 4. From these results, the Langmuir model describes better the adsorption of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120, as shown by the coefficients of correlation is close to unity (RBPA2 = 0.9576 and RBPA2 = 0.9646) compared to those obtained with the Freundlich model (RBPA2 = 0.6192 and RBPA2 = 0.6228). This reflects mainly to a micropore filling of BPA and diuron on the microporosity of ANS@H2O-120. Additionally, the length of BPA and diuron molecules is 0.94 and 0.75 nm, respectively, and the average pore size of ANS@H2O-120 is 1.7 nm, which indicate that BPA and diuron molecules can enter easily to the porous structure of ANS@H2O-120. Besides, the separation factor (RL) is between 0 and 1, which proves that the adsorption of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120 is favorable. Clearly, the outcomes obtained, in terms of adsorption capacity, are higher than most outcomes obtained on other types of adsorbents, stated in the literature (for example, AC, graphene, and graphite) (Table 4).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Linear modeling by a Langmuir model, b Freundlich model, c Plot of Ln(Kd) vs. 1000/T for thermodynamic parameters

Table 4.

Langmuir and Freundlich parameters and compared maximum adsorption capacity of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120 with different adsorbents

Langmuir Freundlich
Q max
(mg/g)
K L
(L/mg)
R L R 2 K F
(mg/g)/(mg/L)n
n R 2
BPA 1408 24.483 0.001 0.9576 1569 0.757 0.6192
Diuron 1087 5.412 0.005 0.9646 1166 1.343 0.6228
Microporous carbon Specific surface area (m2/g) Adsorption capacity (mg/g) Reference
Bisphenol A
ANS@H2O-120 2853 1408 Current study
Activated carbon (AC-HP) 1372 1250 (Zbair et al. 2018b)
Activated carbon (Takeda) 1119 23.5 (Nakanishi et al. 2002)
Graphene 327 181.6 (Xu et al. 2012)
mesoporous carbon (CMK3) 920 296 (Sui et al. 2011)
Activated carbon 1760 432.3 (Liu et al. 2009)
Activated carbon powder 771.2 (Li et al. 2014)
CoFe2O4/activated carbon 727.2 (Li et al. 2014)
Diuron
ANS@H2O-120 2853 1087 Current study
Activated carbon 2128 292.9 (López-Ramón et al. 2007)
Activated carbon fiber 1709 667.2 (López-Ramón et al. 2007)
Activated carbon 776 279.4 (Ángeles Fontecha-Cámara et al. 2006)
Activated carbon 1139 51.2 (Bahri et al. 2012)
Carbon nanotubes 258.6 39.6 (Sun et al. 2012)

Information on the effect of temperature on the adsorption process on ANS@H2O-120 was achieved by varying the solution temperature from 293 to 333 K while keeping the other parameters constant. The results obtained are used to determine thermodynamic parameters (ΔH°, ΔS°, and ΔG°) related to the adsorption reaction of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120. The variations of Ln(Kd) as a function of (1000/T) are shown in Fig. 8c and the thermodynamic parameters are grouped in Table 5. The negative standard enthalpy (ΔH° < 0) shows the exothermic nature of the adsorption of the two studied pollutants. The values of standard free enthalpy at different temperatures are negative (ΔG° < 0) revealing a spontaneous adsorption phenomenon. The negative entropy (ΔS°) of BPA and diuron adsorption indicates that randomness is decreased at the solid-liquid interface (Badruddoza et al. 2011). Moreover, the adsorption process is supposed to be physisorption, when the values of ΔG° are between 0 and − 20 kJ/mol, whereas for chemisorption, the values of ΔG° are generally between − 80 and − 400 kJ/mol (Khan et al. 2017; Zbair et al. 2018b). In this study, ΔG° obtained ranged between − 7 to − 17 kJ/mol for BPA and − 10 to − 18 kJ/mol for diuron, which means that the adsorption process of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120 is physisorption.

Table 5.

Thermodynamic parameters of BPA and diuron adsorption on ANS@H2O-120

Thermodynamics ΔH°
(J/mol)
ΔS°
(J/mol K)
ΔG°
(kJ/mol)
parameters 293 K 303 K 313 K
BPA − 323.02 − 1013 − 17.620 − 13.124 − 7.557
Diuron − 114.6 − 313.4 − 18.580 − 14.104 − 10.610

Regeneration and reuse

The regeneration of ANS@H2O-120 was carried out using ethanol to desorb the adsorbed pollutants (BPA and diuron). The adsorption efficiency of BPA and diuron on regenerated ANS@H2O-120 is shown in Fig. 9. The results show that the efficiency of the adsorption on ANS@H2O-120 remains practically constant (decrease in the order of 2.03%) after 5 cycles of adsorption/desorption of BPA. In the case of diuron after 5 adsorption-desorption cycles, the adsorption efficiency decreases in the order of 5.78%. Figure 1S shows the XRD patterns of fresh ANS@H2O-120 and the recycled ANS@H2O-120 after adsorption of BPA and diuron (BPA/ANS@H2O-120 and diuron/ANS@H2O-120). The results show that there is no modification occurred on the phase structure of recycled adsorbents, which indicate that our regeneration protocol using ethanol is promising for regeneration studies.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Regeneration and reuse of ANS@H2O-120 using ethanol

In general, the experimental results obtained suggest that ANS@H2O-120 prepared by steam activation can be used as a recyclable, separable, and effective adsorbent for the decontamination of wastewater.

Adsorption mechanism

In order to elucidate the adsorption mechanism of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120, FTIR spectroscopy was used to study the ANS@H2O-120 before and after adsorption (Fig. 10). In general, the possible mechanisms for the adsorption of organic pollutants on carbonaceous materials are an electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bond formation, n-π interaction, π-π interaction, and pore filling (Coughlin and Ezra 1968; Tran et al. 2017a).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

FTIR spectra of ANS@H2O-120 before and BPA and diuron adsorption

The FTIR spectra of BPA loaded ANS@H2O-120 show that the peaks around 3428 and 1652 cm−1 are slightly shifted from their original position to 3309 and 1612 cm−1, respectively (Fig. 10a). In the same case for diuron, the peaks around 3428 and 1652 cm−1 are slightly shifted from their original position to 3290 and 1646 cm−1, respectively (Fig. 10b). Knowing that the peak located at 3428 cm−1 is assigned to -OH groups and the peak observed at 1652 cm−1 is corresponding to C=C of the aromatic rings, the shift can be interpreted by the formation of hydrogen bonds between hydroxyl groups present in both BPA molecule and ANS@H2O-120 and hydrogen bonds between -OH present in ANS@H2O-120 with nitrogen atom present in the diuron molecule (Coughlin and Ezra 1968; Tran et al. 2017a, b). The schematic representation of the π-π interaction and hydrogen bonding between BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120 is presented in Fig. 11.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Proposed adsorption mechanism (except pore filling)

Response surface method

In this study, the parameters for maximum BPA and diuron adsorption onto ANS@H2O-120, such as pH, concentration, and contact time, were optimized using central composite design (CCD) under RSM (Anfar et al. 2017). The experimental results presented in Table 2S were used to develop the polynomial equation below (Eqs. (2) and (3)), which was used to optimize the parameters for adsorption of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120. The results of ANOVA for BPA and diuron adsorption on ANS@H2O-120 showed P value less than 0.05 in both models. Therefore, both developed models explain very well the phenomenon studied, with a confidence level of 95% (Table 3S). According to the ANOVA, the term “P value” shows the degree of effectiveness of each model (P value < 0.05 is considered effective and those with P values > 0.05 are regarded as ineffective) (Ahsaine et al. 2018).

R%BPA=98.9289.749XpH0.949XC+1.387XCT7.688X2pH1.982X2C1.681X2CT+3.809X2pHC+2.594X2pHCT+1.594X2CCT 2
R%diuron=98.56+12.432XpH0.255XC+5.722XCT10.012X2pH+0.270X2C0.031X2CT+0.223X2pHC9.287X2pHCT1.277X2CCT 3

As shown in Table 3S, the R2 of BPA and diuron models was found to be 0.964 and 0.937, respectively. According to the value of these coefficients, we can conclude that there is a good agreement between the experimental and predicted responses of BPA and diuron removal percentage on ANS@H2O-120. From all coefficients presented in Table 3S, we found that only “X2pH” and “X2pH-C” interactions affect the BPA adsorption significantly and “X2pH” and “X2pH-CT” in the case of diuron. In the same context, as shown in Fig. 12, the homogenous distribution of the residues on the “0” axis and the absence of the Henry line confirm the normality of the residues (Tanyildizi 2011).

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Normality test: a plot of raw residuals vs Ycalculated, b probability as a function of residual

Based on RSM and the contour plot (Fig. 13), we are able to optimize the adsorption process of BPA and diuron on ANS@H2O-120. The optimum parameters obtained from RSM and contour plot are as follows:

  • BPA: pH = 6.5, 15 min, and 60 mg/L.

  • Diuron: pH = 6.69, 15 min, and 40 mg/L.

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

RSM and corresponding contour plot of BPA and diuron

Under these conditions, we found experimentally the removal of 99.24% for BPA and 99.46% for diuron adsorption, while the predicted values by the model were as follows: 98.85% for BPA adsorption and 99.53% for diuron adsorption. This shows that the model follows rather well the experimentally determined values of adsorption.

Conclusion

In this study, different microporous carbon materials derived from ANS were used effectively for the adsorptive removal of BPA and diuron from aqueous solution. From the prepared carbons, the one activated during 120 min represented the best initial characteristics due to the high surface area and well-developed porosity. Therefore, it was selected for the adsorption tests. The adsorption process on ANS@H2O-120 was described well using pseudo-second-order kinetic and Langmuir isotherm (micropore filling) models with maximum adsorption capacities of 1408 mg/g for BPA and 1087 mg/g for diuron. In addition, the values of thermodynamic parameters indicated that the adsorption process on ANS@H2O-120 was spontaneous and exothermic in nature. The regeneration of ANS@H2O-120 by ethanol was successful even after five times of adsorption-regeneration cycles (a very low decrease from 99.98 to 97.95% for BPA and from 99.88 to 94.10% in the case of diuron was observed). RSM was used to model the adsorption process to find out the optimal parameters for the process. It was found that the developed model predicts well the results, and the optimal parameter values for the BPA adsorption were as follows: pH = 6.5, 15 min, and 60 mg/L and for diuron: pH = 6.69, 15 min, and 40 mg/L.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1 (68.9KB, docx)

(DOCX 68.8 kb)

Acknowledgements

Open access funding provided by University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital.

Funding information

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP/ 2007–2013) under the grant agreement no. [PIRSES-GA-2012-317714]. No-Waste.

References

  1. Ahsaine HA, Zbair M, Anfar Z, et al. Cationic dyes adsorption onto high surface area ‘almond shell’ activated carbon: kinetics, equilibrium isotherms and surface statistical modeling. Mater Today Chem. 2018;8:121–132. doi: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. AL-Othman ZA, Ali R, Naushad M. Hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous medium by activated carbon prepared from peanut shell: adsorption kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Chem Eng J. 2012;184:238–247. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anastopoulos I, Anagnostopoulos VA, Bhatnagar A, Mitropoulos AC, Kyzas GZ. A review for chromium removal by carbon nanotubes. Chem Ecol. 2017;33:572–588. doi: 10.1080/02757540.2017.1328503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anastopoulos I, Margiotoudis I, Massas I (2018) The use of olive tree pruning waste compost to sequestrate methylene blue dye from aqueous solution [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Anfar Z, El Haouti R, Lhanafi S, et al. Treated digested residue during anaerobic co-digestion of agri-food organic waste: methylene blue adsorption, mechanism and CCD-RSM design. J Environ Chem Eng. 2017;5:5857–5867. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.11.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ángeles Fontecha-Cámara M, López-Ramón MV, Álvarez-Merino MA, Moreno-Castilla C. Temperature dependence of herbicide adsorption from aqueous solutions on activated carbon fiber and cloth. Langmuir. 2006;22:9586–9590. doi: 10.1021/la061666v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Arena F, Dario R, Parmaliana A. A characterization study of the surface acidity of solid catalysts by temperature programmed methods. Appl Catal A Gen. 1998;170:127–137. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00041-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bădescu IS, Bulgariu D, Ahmad I, Bulgariu L. Valorisation possibilities of exhausted biosorbents loaded with metal ions—a review. J Environ Manag. 2018;224:288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Badruddoza AZM, Tay ASH, Tan PY, Hidajat K, Uddin MS. Carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin conjugated magnetic nanoparticles as nano-adsorbents for removal of copper ions: synthesis and adsorption studies. J Hazard Mater. 2011;185:1177–1186. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bahri Mounia Al, Calvo Luisa, Lemus Jesús, Gilarranz Miguel A., Palomar José, Rodriguez Juan J. Mechanistic understanding of the behavior of diuron in the adsorption from water onto activated carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2012;198-199:346–354. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bautista-Toledo I, Ferro-García MA, Rivera-Utrilla J, Moreno-Castilla C, Vegas Fernández FJ. Bisphenol A removal from water by activated carbon. Effects of carbon characteristics and solution chemistry. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:6246–6250. doi: 10.1021/es0481169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bhatnagar A, Anastopoulos I. Adsorptive removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from aqueous solution: a review. Chemosphere. 2017;168:885–902. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bouchelta C, Medjram MS, Bertrand O, Bellat J-P. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from date stones by physical activation with steam. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2008;82:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2007.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bulgariu L, Bulgariu D, Macoveanu M. Adsorptive performances of alkaline treated peat for heavy metal removal. Sep Sci Technol. 2011;46:1023–1033. doi: 10.1080/01496395.2010.536192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cho SH, Park JS, Choi SH, Lee SK, Kim SH. Effect of water vapor on carbon monoxide oxidation over promoted platinum catalysts. Catal Lett. 2005;103:257–261. doi: 10.1007/s10562-005-7162-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Claver A, Ormad P, Rodríguez L, Ovelleiro JL. Study of the presence of pesticides in surface waters in the Ebro river basin (Spain) Chemosphere. 2006;64:1437–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Coughlin RW, Ezra FS. Role of surface acidity in the adsorption of organic pollutants on the surface of carbon. Environ Sci Technol. 1968;2:291–297. doi: 10.1021/es60016a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Sales PF, Magriotis ZM, Rossi MALS, Resende RF, Nunes CA. Optimization by response surface methodology of the adsorption of Coomassie blue dye on natural and acid-treated clays. J Environ Manag. 2013;130:417–428. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Djebbar KE, Zertal A, Debbache N, Sehili T. Comparison of diuron degradation by direct UV photolysis and advanced oxidation processes. J Environ Manag. 2008;88:1505–1512. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dores EFGC, Spadotto CA, Weber OLS, Carbo L, Vecchiato AB, Pinto AA. Environmental behaviour of metolachlor and diuron in a tropical soil in the central region of Brazil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009;197:175–183. doi: 10.1007/s11270-008-9801-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Eftekhari A. On the mechanism of microporous carbon supercapacitors. Mater Today Chem. 2018;7:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2017.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. El Assal Z, Ojala S, Pitkäaho S, et al. Comparative study on the support properties in the total oxidation of dichloromethane over Pt catalysts. Chem Eng J. 2017;313:1010–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ello AS, de Souza LKC, Trokourey A, Jaroniec M. Coconut shell-based microporous carbons for CO2 capture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013;180:280–283. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Feng J, Zheng Z, Sun Y, Luan J, Wang Z, Wang L, Feng J. Degradation of diuron in aqueous solution by dielectric barrier discharge. J Hazard Mater. 2008;154:1081–1089. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Field JA, Reed RL, Sawyer TE, Griffith SM, Wigington PJ. Diuron occurrence and distribution in soil and surface and ground water associated with grass seed production. J Environ Qual. 2003;32:171–179. doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fierro V, Torné-Fernández V, Celzard A. Methodical study of the chemical activation of Kraft lignin with KOH and NaOH. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2007;101:419–431. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.12.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fontecha-Cámara MA, López-Ramón MV, Álvarez-Merino MA, Moreno-Castilla C. Effect of surface chemistry, solution pH, and ionic strength on the removal of herbicides diuron and amitrole from water by an activated carbon fiber. Langmuir. 2007;23:1242–1247. doi: 10.1021/la062200f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fu H, Yang L, Wan Y, Xu Z, Zhu D. Adsorption of pharmaceuticals to microporous activated carbon treated with potassium hydroxide, carbon dioxide, and steam. J Environ Qual. 2011;40:1886–1894. doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hadoun H, Sadaoui Z, Souami N, Sahel D, Toumert I. Characterization of mesoporous carbon prepared from date stems by {H3PO4} chemical activation. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;280:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Inoue MH, de Oliveira RS, Jr, Constantin J, et al. Leaching potential and degradation of diuron in two soils of contrasting texture. Acta Sci-Agron. 2008;30:631–638. doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v30i5.5963. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ismadji S, Bhatia SK. A modified pore-filling isotherm for liquid-phase adsorption in activated carbon. Langmuir. 2001;17:1488–1498. doi: 10.1021/la0009339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ji Y, Li T, Zhu L, Wang X, Lin Q. Preparation of activated carbons by microwave heating {KOH} activation. Appl Surf Sci. 2007;254:506–512. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.06.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Khan ME, Khan MM, Cho MH. Ce3+-ion, surface oxygen vacancy, and visible light-induced photocatalytic dye degradation and photocapacitive performance of CeO2-graphene nanostructures. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5928. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06139-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kilpimaa S, Runtti H, Kangas T, Lassi U, Kuokkanen T. Physical activation of carbon residue from biomass gasification: novel sorbent for the removal of phosphates and nitrates from aqueous solution. J Ind Eng Chem. 2015;21:1354–1364. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.06.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lane RF, Adams CD, Randtke SJ, Carter RE. Chlorination and chloramination of bisphenol A, bisphenol F, and bisphenol A diglycidyl ether in drinking water. Water Res. 2015;79:68–78. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee S, Liao C, Song G-J, Ra K, Kannan K, Moon HB. Emission of bisphenol analogues including bisphenol A and bisphenol F from wastewater treatment plants in Korea. Chemosphere. 2015;119:1000–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Li Z, Gondal MA, Yamani ZH. Preparation of magnetic separable CoFe2O4/PAC composite and the adsorption of bisphenol A from aqueous solution. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2014;18:208–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jscs.2011.06.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lin L, Zhai S-R, Xiao Z-Y, Song Y, An QD, Song XW. Dye adsorption of mesoporous activated carbons produced from NaOH-pretreated rice husks. Bioresour Technol. 2013;136:437–443. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu G, Ma J, Li X, Qin Q. Adsorption of bisphenol A from aqueous solution onto activated carbons with different modification treatments. J Hazard Mater. 2009;164:1275–1280. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu Y, Xu Z, Wu X, Gui W, Zhu G. Adsorption and desorption behavior of herbicide diuron on various Chinese cultivated soils. J Hazard Mater. 2010;178:462–468. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. López-Ramón MV, Fontecha-Cámara MA, Álvarez-Merino MA, Moreno-Castilla C. Removal of diuron and amitrole from water under static and dynamic conditions using activated carbons in form of fibers, cloth, and grains. Water Res. 2007;41:2865–2870. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Maneerung T, Liew J, Dai Y, Kawi S, Chong C, Wang CH. Activated carbon derived from carbon residue from biomass gasification and its application for dye adsorption: kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic studies. Bioresour Technol. 2016;200:350–359. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Meng Y, Gu D, Zhang F, Shi Y, Cheng L, Feng D, Wu Z, Chen Z, Wan Y, Stein A, Zhao D. A family of highly ordered mesoporous polymer resin and carbon structures from organic-organic self-assembly. Chem Mater. 2006;18:4447–4464. doi: 10.1021/cm060921u. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mohamed AR, Mohammadi M, Darzi GN. Preparation of carbon molecular sieve from lignocellulosic biomass: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2010;14:1591–1599. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.01.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nakagawa K, Namba A, Mukai SR, Tamon H, Ariyadejwanich P, Tanthapanichakoon W. Adsorption of phenol and reactive dye from aqueous solution on activated carbons derived from solid wastes. Water Res. 2004;38:1791–1798. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nakanishi A, Tamai M, Kawasaki N, Nakamura T, Tanada S. Adsorption characteristics of bisphenol A onto carbonaceous materials produced from wood chips as organic waste. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2002;252:393–396. doi: 10.1006/jcis.2002.8387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Prauchner MJ, Rodríguez-Reinoso F. Chemical versus physical activation of coconut shell: a comparative study. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012;152:163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.11.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rezma S, Birot M, Hafiane A, Deleuze H. Physically activated microporous carbon from a new biomass source: date palm petioles. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2017;20:881–887. doi: 10.1016/j.crci.2017.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ricordel S, Taha S, Cisse I, Dorange G. Heavy metals removal by adsorption onto peanut husks carbon: characterization, kinetic study and modeling. Sep Purif Technol. 2001;24:389–401. doi: 10.1016/S1383-5866(01)00139-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sayğılı H, Güzel F. Novel and sustainable precursor for high-quality activated carbon preparation by conventional pyrolysis: optimization of produce conditions and feasibility in adsorption studies. Adv Powder Technol. 2018;29:726–736. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2017.12.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sayʇili H, Güzel F, Önal Y. Conversion of grape industrial processing waste to activated carbon sorbent and its performance in cationic and anionic dyes adsorption. J Clean Prod. 2015;93:84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW, et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984) Pure Appl Chem. 1985;57:603–619. doi: 10.1351/pac198557040603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sivachidambaram M, Vijaya JJ, Kennedy LJ, Jothiramalingam R, al-Lohedan HA, Munusamy MA, Elanthamilan E, Merlin JP. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon derived from the Borassus flabellifer flower as an electrode material for supercapacitor applications. New J Chem. 2017;41:3939–3949. doi: 10.1039/C6NJ03867K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sui Q, Huang J, Liu Y, Chang X, Ji G, Deng S, Xie T, Yu G. Rapid removal of bisphenol A on highly ordered mesoporous carbon. J Environ Sci. 2011;23:177–182. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60391-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sun K, Zhang Z, Gao B, Wang Z, Xu D, Jin J, Liu X. Adsorption of diuron, fluridone and norflurazon on single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Sci Total Environ. 2012;439:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Suresh S, Srivastava VC, Mishra IM. Adsorption of hydroquinone in aqueous solution by granulated activated carbon. J Environ Eng. 2011;137:1145–1157. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000443. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tanyildizi MT. Modeling of adsorption isotherms and kinetics of reactive dye from aqueous solution by peanut hull. Chem Eng J. 2011;168:1234–1240. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tran HN, You S-J, Chao H-P. Fast and efficient adsorption of methylene green 5 on activated carbon prepared from new chemical activation method. J Environ Manag. 2017;188:322–336. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Tran HN, You S-J, Chao H-P. Insight into adsorption mechanism of cationic dye onto agricultural residues-derived hydrochars: negligible role of π-π interaction. Korean J Chem Eng. 2017;34:1708–1720. doi: 10.1007/s11814-017-0056-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tsai W-T, Lai C-W, Su T-Y. Adsorption of bisphenol-A from aqueous solution onto minerals and carbon adsorbents. J Hazard Mater. 2006;134:169–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.10.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang F, Lu X, Peng W, Deng Y, Zhang T, Hu Y, Li XY. Sorption behavior of bisphenol A and triclosan by graphene: comparison with activated carbon. ACS Omega. 2017;2:5378–5384. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang R, Lu K-Q, Tang Z-R, Xu Y-J. Recent progress in carbon quantum dots: synthesis{,} properties and applications in photocatalysis. J Mater Chem A. 2017;5:3717–3734. doi: 10.1039/C6TA08660H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Weber WJ, Morris JC. Kinetics of adsorption carbon from solutions. J Sanit Engeering Div Proceedings Am Soc Civ Eng. 1963;89:31–60. [Google Scholar]
  64. Xu J, Wang L, Zhu Y. Decontamination of bisphenol A from aqueous solution by graphene adsorption. Langmuir. 2012;28:8418–8425. doi: 10.1021/la301476p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zbair M, Ahsaine HA, Anfar Z. Porous carbon by microwave assisted pyrolysis: an effective and low-cost adsorbent for sulfamethoxazole adsorption and optimization using response surface methodology. J Clean Prod. 2018;202:571–581. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zbair M, Ainassaari K, Drif A, Ojala S, Bottlinger M, Pirilä M, Keiski RL, Bensitel M, Brahmi R. Toward new benchmark adsorbents: preparation and characterization of activated carbon from argan nut shell for bisphenol A removal. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:1869–1882. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0634-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESM 1 (68.9KB, docx)

(DOCX 68.8 kb)


Articles from Environmental Science and Pollution Research International are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES