Skip to main content
Operative Neurosurgery logoLink to Operative Neurosurgery
letter
. 2017 Oct 11;13(6):E39–E42. doi: 10.1093/ons/opx212

Letter: Reconsidering Bone Morphogenetic Protein in the Cervical Spine: Selective Use for Managing Type II Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly

Francis J Jareczek *, Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah , Efrem M Cox §, Nader S Dahdaleh , Patrick W Hitchon , Matthew A Howard III
PMCID: PMC6281404  PMID: 29040717

To the Editor:

Type II odontoid fractures are common and result in significant morbidity and mortality in the elderly. The optimal treatment strategy for these fractures is controversial. Both nonoperative immobilization and operative fixation can be effective, but each is associated with unique complications. Failure of fracture healing is common and is likely due in part to poor bone quality among the elderly. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP) is an osteogenic peptide that has been used to facilitate fracture healing. However, reports of significant adverse events associated with the use of rhBMP in the cervical spine led to a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning in 2008. Given the limitations of currently available treatment options and the significant morbidity of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly, we propose considering the use of local, low-dose rhBMP as an adjunctive treatment for these fractures. To assess the technical feasibility of targeted rhBMP administration to the odontoid, we created a type II odontoid fracture in a cadaveric cervical spine specimen. An rhBMP-soaked collagen sponge homogenate was then delivered via an 18G spinal needle through a transoral approach to the fracture site under fluoroscopic guidance. The rhBMP solution was delivered without difficulty. The bony defect was noted to be filled completely without spillover of the injection material. While rigorous studies are necessary to assess both the clinical efficacy and potential complications associated with this therapy, we believe local delivery of rhBMP to the odontoid is feasible and may constitute a promising adjunctive treatment option for type II odontoid fractures in the elderly.

Odontoid fractures of the second cervical vertebra occur following hyperflexion of the spine and are classified as type I, II, or III.1 Type I and III fractures are considered stable and are generally managed nonoperatively, healing well with immobilization. Type II fractures through the odontoid base are the most common, are unstable, and have a high rate of nonunion.1 Odontoid fractures are overrepresented among the elderly.2,3 Most are caused by low-energy trauma, such as fall from standing height.4 This population's increased susceptibility to odontoid fractures is likely due to degenerative changes in the cervical spine.5 The majority of these fractures are unstable type II fractures6-8 for which high nonunion rates are further exacerbated by poor bone quality.

Type II fractures can be managed nonoperatively or operatively.9 Current evidence has not identified one strategy as superior to the rest, particularly in the elderly.10-12 Nonoperative immobilization employs a rigid cervical spine collar or the halo vest13,14 and is variably successful, resulting in fracture healing in 0%15 to nearly 100% of patients.16-20 These less invasive options may be selected to minimize operative morbidity;21 however, immobilization can worsen quality of life22 and is not without complications, which include treatment failure23, and for the halo vest, pin infection, pressure sores, nerve injury, and increased mortality.18,24-27 Most studies demonstrate that operative management produces higher rates of bony fusion,9 and some additionally suggest that it improves functional outcomes28 and overall survival.15,29-31 However, these benefits may be diminished in older patients32 due to increased rates of complications and comorbidities.28,33 It is this patient population that requires innovative treatment options.

A significant barrier to fracture healing is poor bone quality,34-37 which worsens with age and thus becomes important in considering fracture management in the elderly. One strategy that may hold promise is the use of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), an osteogenic material that induces bone formation and is important for achieving maximal bone mass in healthy individuals.38,39 Evidence suggests that in osteoporotic bone, BMP efficacy is decreased40-42 while supplementation of BMP augments bone healing and strength,43-49 leading osteoporosis to be described by some as a “bone morphogenetic disorder.”50 As such, increasing BMP back to physiological levels may be critical for facilitating healing when native bone quality is poor.51

Given the osteogenic properties of BMP, rhBMP peptides have been exploited to facilitate bony fusion in clinical populations. Based on small clinical trials,52,53 the FDA approved rhBMP-2 in 2002 as a bone graft substitute for single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Exemption approval was then granted for rhBMP-7 for posterolateral fusion (PLF) revisions. Current FDA-approved indications for rhBMP in the spine remain limited to ALIFs and PLFs. However, the clinical use of rhBMP in the spine has expanded,54 and up to 85% of the use of rhBMP may actually be off-label.55 Initial studies of rhBMP-2 in cervical fusions demonstrated good outcomes,56,57 but trial data revealed significant complications in 10% to 50% of cases.58 Hoarseness, dysphagia, and, rarely, risk of respiratory compromise59-61 were related to swelling,62 which was attributed to a local inflammatory response and seemed to be dose-related. The recognition of these adverse events led to a 2008 FDA safety alert for the use of rhBMP in cervical fusions.63

Current strategies for managing type II odontoid fractures in the elderly remain suboptimal. These patients’ poorer health precludes surgical intervention under general anesthesia, and their poorer bone quality compromises fracture healing. The use of agents to stimulate local osteogenesis has the potential to improve outcomes. We therefore propose transoral delivery of rhBMP to the fracture site to facilitate fusion while avoiding operative management. Though the use of rhBMP in cervical spine fusions has been associated with significant adverse events, these complications seem to be dose-related and could plausibly be avoided by a focal application of a smaller peptide dose. Thus, we believe it prudent to consider the judicious use of rhBMP to improve management of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly. Specifically, we propose that local application of rhBMP directly to the fracture site would be an effective adjunct for nonoperative management.

To examine the feasibility of local delivery, we performed transoral administration of an rhBMP solution to the odontoid of a human cadaveric cervical spine specimen. Institutional Review Board approval or patient consent was not required. While maintaining the integrity of the spinal ligaments, joints, and discs, a type II odontoid fracture was created using an osteotome and mallet and was confirmed with fluoroscopy (Figure 1). One mg of rhBMP-2 (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) was combined with 10 mL of radiopaque gadodiamide medium (Amersham Health, Princeton, New Jersey) to produce a 0.1 mg/mL rhBMP solution. A collagen sponge was saturated with the rhBMP solution and homogenized for injection. Under fluoroscopic guidance, an 18G spinal needle was used to enter the fracture anteriorly to simulate a transoral approach (Figure 2A). The rhBMP solution was then slowly injected into the fracture (Figure 2B) until the defect was completely filled. Fluoroscopic imaging was used to confirm placement and volume (Figure 2C). The needle was easily guided into the fracture site, and the rhBMP solution was delivered without difficulty. No spillover of the injection material was noted.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

AP (anterior-posterior) fluoroscopic image demonstrating a type II fracture of the odontoid in a cadaveric cervical spine specimen.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Fluoroscopic images demonstrating lateral view of the odontoid during administration of rhBMP solution to the fracture site. A, The tip of an 18G spinal needle was used to enter the fracture site. B, A homogenized collagen sponge soaked in rhBMP was then slowly injected into the defect until, C, complete filling of the defect was noted. Care was taken to avoid spilling of the rhBMP solution outside of the fracture site.

Given the high morbidity and mortality of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly in concert with the lack of adequate treatment options, we propose considering the judicious use of rhBMP as an adjunct to nonoperative management of these fractures. We demonstrate the feasibility of local administration of this osteogenic peptide via direct injection into the fracture site. Though concerns have been raised regarding the complications associated with the use of rhBMP in the high cervical spine, the focal application of low-dose rhBMP to treat type II odontoid fractures constitutes an alternative approach to facilitate fracture healing and merits further study. While assessing the efficacy of this treatment in a large clinical population is required before definitive conclusions can be drawn, this approach is promising and may have a significant impact on improving the morbidity associated with type II odontoid fractures in the elderly.

Disclosure

The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(8):1663-1674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Vaccaro AR, Madigan L, Ehrler DM. Contemporary management of adult cervical odontoid fractures. Orthopedics. 2000;23:1109-1113; quiz 1114-1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ryan MD, Henderson JJ. The epidemiology of fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. Injury. 1992;23(1):38-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Alker GJ, Oh YS, Leslie EV, Lehotay J, Panaro VA, Eschner EG. Postmortem radiology of head neck injuries in fatal traffic accidents. Radiology. 1975;114(3):611-617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Brolin K. Neck injuries among the elderly in Sweden. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2003;10(3):155-164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Muller EJ, Wick M, Russe O, Muhr G. Management of odontoid fractures in the elderly. Eur Spine J. 1999;8(5):360-365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Clark CR, White AA 3rd. Fractures of the dens. A multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(9):1340-1348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hsu WK, Anderson PA. Odontoid fractures: update on management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(7):383-394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ryken TC, Hadley MN, Aarabi Bet al. Management of isolated fractures of the axis in adults. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(suppl 2):132-150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Elgafy H, Dvorak MF, Vaccaro AR, Ebraheim N. Treatment of displaced type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009;38:410-416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Denaro V, Papalia R, Di Martino A, Denaro L, Maffulli N. The best surgical treatment for type II fractures of the dens is still controversial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(3):742-750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Pal D, Sell P, Grevitt M. Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: an evidence-based narrative review of management. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(2):195-204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Richter D, Latta LL, Milne ELet al. The stabilizing effects of different orthoses in the intact and unstable upper cervical spine: a cadaver study. J Trauma. 2001;50(5):848-854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Botte MJ, Garfin SR, Byrne TP, Woo SL, Nickel VL. The halo skeletal fixator. Principles of application and maintenance. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989:12-18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Scheyerer MJ, Zimmermann SM, Simmen HP, Wanner GA, Werner CM. Treatment modality in type II odontoid fractures defines the outcome in elderly patients. BMC Surg. 2013;13:54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lieberman IH, Webb JK. Cervical spine injuries in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:877-881. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lennarson PJ, Mostafavi H, Traynelis VC, Walters BC. Management of type II dens fractures: a case-control study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(10):1234-1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ryan MD, Taylor TK. Odontoid fractures in the elderly. J Spinal Disord. 1993;6(5):397-401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Muller EJ, Schwinnen I, Fischer K, Wick M, Muhr G. Non-rigid immobilisation of odontoid fractures. Eur Spine J. 2003;12(5):522-525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Stoney J, O’brien J, Wilde P. Treatment of type-two odontoid fractures in halothoracic vests. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(3):452-455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Rizk E, Kelleher JP, Zalatimo Oet al. Nonoperative management of odontoid fractures: a review of 59 cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115(9):1653-1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK, Kopjar Bet al. Functional and quality-of-life outcomes in geriatric patients with type-II dens fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(8):729-735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Waqar M, Van-Popta D, Barone DG, Sarsam Z. External immobilisation of odontoid fractures: a systematic review to compare the halo and hard collar. World Neurosurg. 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Torregrossa F, Grasso G. Conservative management for odontoid cervical fractures: halo or rigid cervical collar? World Neurosurg. 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hanigan WC, Powell FC, Elwood PW, Henderson JP. Odontoid fractures in elderly patients. J Neurosurg. 1993;78(1):32-35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Pepin JW, Bourne RB, Hawkins RJ. Odontoid fractures, with special reference to the elderly patient. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985:178-183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Garfin SR, Botte MJ, Waters RL, Nickel VL. Complications in the use of the halo fixation device. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(3):320-325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Barlow DR, Higgins BT, Ozanne EM, Tosteson AN, Pearson AM. Cost effectiveness of operative versus non-operative treatment of geriatric type-II odontoid fracture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(7):610-617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bednar DA, Parikh J, Hummel J. Management of type II odontoid process fractures in geriatric patients; a prospective study of sequential cohorts with attention to survivorship. J Spinal Disord. 1995;8(2):166-169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Robinson Y, Robinson A, Olerud C. Systematic review on surgical and nonsurgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:231948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Chapman J, Smith JS, Kopjar Bet al. The AOSpine North America Geriatric Odontoid Fracture Mortality Study: a retrospective review of mortality outcomes for operative versus nonoperative treatment of 322 patients with long-term follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(13):1098-1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Fehlings MG, Arun R, Vaccaro AR, Arnold PM, Chapman JR, Kopjar B. Predictors of treatment outcomes in geriatric patients with odontoid fractures: AOSpine North America multi-centre prospective GOF study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(11):881-886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Graffeo CS, Perry A, Puffer RCet al. Deadly falls: operative versus nonoperative management of type II odontoid process fracture in octogenarians. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(1):4-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Thormann U, Khawassna TE, Ray Set al. Differences of bone healing in metaphyseal defect fractures between osteoporotic and physiological bone in rats. Injury. 2014;45(3):487-493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Giannoudis P, Tzioupis C, Almalki T, Buckley R. Fracture healing in osteoporotic fractures: is it really different? A basic science perspective. Injury. 2007;38(suppl 1):S90-S99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Namkung-Matthai H, Appleyard R, Jansen Jet al. Osteoporosis influences the early period of fracture healing in a rat osteoporotic model. Bone. 2001;28(1):80-86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lill CA, Hesseln J, Schlegel U, Eckhardt C, Goldhahn J, Schneider E. Biomechanical evaluation of healing in a non-critical defect in a large animal model of osteoporosis. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(5):836-842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science. 1965;150(3698):893-899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Chen D, Zhao M, Mundy GR. Bone morphogenetic proteins. Growth Factors. 2004;22(4):233-241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Styrkarsdottir U, Cazier JB, Kong Aet al. Linkage of osteoporosis to chromosome 20p12 and association to BMP2. PLoS Biol. 2003;1(3):e69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zhou S, Zilberman Y, Wassermann K, Bain SD, Sadovsky Y, Gazit D. Estrogen modulates estrogen receptor alpha and beta expression, osteogenic activity, and apoptosis in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) of osteoporotic mice. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 2001;(suppl 36):144-155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Fleet JC, Cashman K, Cox K, Rosen V. The effects of aging on the bone inductive activity of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Endocrinology. 1996;137(11):4605-4610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Blokhuis T, Buma P, Verdonschot N, Gotthardt M, Hendriks T. BMP-7 stimulates early diaphyseal fracture healing in estrogen deficient rats. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(5):720-725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Simic P, Culej JB, Orlic Iet al. Systemically administered bone morphogenetic protein-6 restores bone in aged ovariectomized rats by increasing bone formation and suppressing bone resorption. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(35):25509-25521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Turgeman G, Zilberman Y, Zhou Set al. Systemically administered rhBMP-2 promotes MSC activity and reverses bone and cartilage loss in osteopenic mice. J Cell Biochem. 2002;86(3):461-474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Diwan AD, Leong A, Appleyard R, Bhargav D, Fang ZM, Wei A. Bone morphogenetic protein-7 accelerates fracture healing in osteoporotic rats. Indian J Orthop. 2013;47(6):540-546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Jing D, Hao X, Xu Fet al. Effects of local delivery of BMP2, zoledronate and their combination on bone microarchitecture, biomechanics and bone turnover in osteoporotic rabbits. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Phillips FM, Turner AS, Seim HB 3rdet al. In vivo BMP-7 (OP-1) enhancement of osteoporotic vertebral bodies in an ovine model. Spine J. 2006;6(5):500-506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Pountos I, Georgouli T, Henshaw K, Bird H, Jones E, Giannoudis PV. The effect of bone morphogenetic protein-2, bone morphogenetic protein-7, parathyroid hormone, and platelet-derived growth factor on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from osteoporotic bone. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(9):552-556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Urist MR, Hudak RT, Huo YK, Rasmussen JK. Osteoporosis: a bone morphogenetic protein auto-immune disorder. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985;187:77-96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Kanakaris NK, Petsatodis G, Tagil M, Giannoudis PV. Is there a role for bone morphogenetic proteins in osteoporotic fractures? Injury. 2009;40(suppl 3):S21-S26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Dickman CA, Zdeblick TA. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2 with tapered interbody cages. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15:337-349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Burkus JK, Transfeldt EE, Kitchel SH, Watkins RG, Balderston RA. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:2396-2408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Haid RW Jr, Branch CL Jr, Alexander JT, Burkus JK. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages. Spine J. 2004;4:527-538; discussion 538-539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Ong KL, Villarraga ML, Lau E, Carreon LY, Kurtz SM, Glassman SD. Off-label use of bone morphogenetic proteins in the United States using administrative data. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:1794-1800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Reames DL, Williams BJ, Shaffrey CI. Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 as an adjunct for instrumented posterior arthrodesis in the occipital cervical region: an analysis of safety, efficacy, and dosing. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2010;1:107-112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Baskin DS, Ryan P, Sonntag V, Westmark R, Widmayer MA. A prospective, randomized, controlled cervical fusion study using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 with the CORNERSTONE-SR allograft ring and the ATLANTIS anterior cervical plate. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:1219-1224; discussion 1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Weiner BK. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011;11:471-491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Buttermann GR. Prospective nonrandomized comparison of an allograft with bone morphogenic protein versus an iliac-crest autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J. 2008;8:426-435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Cahill KS, Chi JH, Day A, Claus EB. Prevalence, complications, and hospital charges associated with use of bone-morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion procedures. JAMA. 2009;302:58-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Perri B, Cooper M, Lauryssen C, Anand N. Adverse swelling associated with use of rh-BMP-2 in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a case study. Spine J. 2007;7:235-239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Smucker JD, Rhee JM, Singh K, Yoon ST, Heller JG. Increased swelling complications associated with off-label usage of rhBMP-2 in the anterior cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:2813-2819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Martin BI, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Deyo RA, Farrokhi FR, Mirza SK. Use of bone morphogenetic protein among patients undergoing fusion for degenerative diagnoses in the United States, 2002 to 2012. Spine J. 2015;15:692-699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Operative Neurosurgery are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES