Abstract
Despite ongoing efforts to control transmission, rabies prevention remains a challenge in many developing countries, especially in rural areas of China where re-emerging rabies is under-reported due to a lack of sustained animal surveillance. By taking advantage of detailed genomic and epidemiological data for the re-emerging rabies outbreak in Yunnan Province, China, collected between 1999 and 2015, we reconstruct the demographic and dispersal history of domestic dog rabies virus (RABV) as well as the dynamics of dog-to-dog and dog-to-human transmission. Phylogeographic analyses reveal a lower diffusion coefficient than previously estimated for dog RABV dissemination in northern Africa. Furthermore, epidemiological analyses reveal transmission rates between dogs, as well as between dogs and humans, lower than estimates for Africa. Finally, we show that reconstructed epidemic history of RABV among dogs and the dynamics of rabid dogs are consistent with the recorded human rabies cases. This work illustrates the benefits of combining phylogeographic and epidemic modelling approaches for uncovering the spatiotemporal dynamics of zoonotic diseases, with both approaches providing estimates of key epidemiological parameters.
Author summary
Although dogs are known to be the primary reservoir and vector of human rabies in African and Asian countries, the spatial epidemiology of rabies virus (RABV) spread in developing regions is still unclear. Using 17 years of genomic and epidemiological data, we reconstruct the recent dispersal history of RABV in domestic dogs in Yunnan, a rural province of China, and estimate RABV transmission rate between dogs and from dogs to humans. Using a phylogeographic approach, we also evaluated the potential impact of several environmental factors on the mode and tempo of virus lineage dispersal. Our findings have implications for rabies prevention and control in Asian countries.
Introduction
Rabies remains a significant threat to public health in the 21st century [1], causing around 60,000 human fatalities worldwide each year [2]. Rabies control in the developing world is currently hindered by a lack of timely and accurate data about rabies cases in both humans and animals [3]. It is thought that the number of human deaths due to rabies virus (RABV) infections is underestimated, and that the dynamics of the virus in dog populations is poorly understood. These uncertainties inevitably hamper improvements in disease control strategies and the evaluation of control measures.
China is second only to India [4] in terms of the national number of human rabies cases, and in recent years the prevalence of rabies has increased in some areas of China [5]. More than 90% of human rabies cases in China occur in rural regions [6] where the proportion of vaccinated dogs is very low [7]. Additionally, China has a growing population of dogs, currently estimated at 80–200 million animals [6], and the breeding, management, and vaccination of dogs in the country is uncontrolled [8]. A better quantitative understanding of rabies epidemiology in dogs is needed to help predict future vaccine demand in China and other developing countries.
Dogs are the primary reservoir and vector of human rabies throughout most of Africa and Asia [9] and are responsible for more than 99% of human rabies cases [1]. Therefore, understanding the dispersal dynamics of rabies in dogs is essential for quantifying dog-to-human transmissions and for disease prevention. Previous studies have documented “traveling waves” of rabies among wildlife populations [10–16] and uncovered the genetic signature of spatial expansion in RABV genomes [17–21]. Recent studies [22–24] have attempted to combine epidemiological and genomic data to study the transmission dynamics of RABV. However, rabies spread in rural areas of China, like Yunnan Province, remains poorly documented despite an increasing incidence of human rabies. Yunnan Province in Southwest China first reported human rabies in 1956 and eliminated the disease by integrated dog management and control measures (including dog registration and the use of dog enclosures, dog vaccination, and culling of rabid/suspected rabid dogs and stray dogs) in the late 1990s. However, a re-emergence of rabies in this province was reported in 1999.
In this study, we combine phylogeographic approaches and mathematical modelling to examine the dispersal dynamics of RABV in Yunnan, a rural province of China. We analyse publicly available and newly-generated RABV gene sequences from domestic dogs, cattle, and humans sampled between 2006 and 2015, together with comprehensive rabies epidemiological data dating back to 1999, when the first re-emerging human rabies case in Yunnan was reported (Fig 1A). Specifically, we aim to use both types of data to reconstruct the demographic and dispersal history of RABV spread in Yunnan, as well as to estimate key epidemiological parameters that can be compared to other previously-studied RABV outbreaks. Finally, we use phylogeographic inference to investigate which environmental factors may have impacted the spatial dispersal dynamics of RABV in Yunnan.
Results
Re-emergence of rabies in Yunnan
Analyses of case records date the first documented rabies case in Yunnan Province back to 1956. These data indicate that an epidemic wave of rabies occurred in the 1980s and that, from the mid-1990s onwards, human rabies cases were reported only sporadically in the region. However, starting in 1999, a new RABV epidemic emerged. More than 900 human rabies cases were reported during 1999–2015, with the highest incidence of 0.3 cases per 100,000 people occurring in 2010 (Fig 1A). Human rabies in Yunnan was first reported in 1999 in the Southeast prefecture of Wenshan, which borders Vietnam and the Chinese province of Guangxi and spread across the province in the next decade [25].
Two RABV lineages dominate the Yunnan epidemic
We first used the discrete diffusion model implemented in BEAST 1.8 to undertake a continental-scale phylogeographic analysis of a broad data set of Asian RABV sequences (S1 Table; see also the Materials and Methods for details). Genetic histories of the RABV N and G genes reveal two individual lineages (YN-A1 and YN-A2, Fig 2) that represent the majority of sampled RABV infections in the post-1999 Yunnan epidemic.
We then used a GLM (generalised linear model) implementation, also available in BEAST 1.8, to measure the correlation between viral effective population size and RABV cases counts in Yunnan. This analysis estimated a GLM coefficient of 0.021 for the association between case counts and the trajectory of log effective population size of clade YN-A1 (which is the main RABV clade identified in Yunnan). The credible interval associated with this GLM coefficient estimate excludes zero (95% HPD: [0.005, 0.036]), and therefore indicates a significant association. The time to most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) estimates of the YN-A2 clade in the N and G gene largely overlap (N gene: 2007.8, 95% HPD: 2006.1–2009.2; G gene: 2008.3, 95% HPD: 2007.0–2009.4). The G gene estimate of the tMRCA of the YN-A1 lineage predates the N gene estimate (N gene: 1999.2, 95% HPD: 1996.6–2008.2; G gene: 1994.7, 95% HPD: 1992.5–1996.6).
Expanding and more localised sub-epidemics
We next performed separate continuous phylogeographic reconstructions [26] for the YN-A1 and YN-A2 clades that were identified above in the discrete phylogeographic analysis. As shown in Fig 3, the inferred RABV diffusion histories estimated from the N and G gene alignments are consistent with each other. The YN-A1 clade underwent a larger spatial expansion and is more widely distributed within dog populations, while the YN-A2 clade appears to be geographically more limited. We compared the amino acid and nucleotide sites that vary between the YN-A1 and YN-A2 clades. There were no amino acid sites changes between these clades, suggesting that the differences in lineage distributions are not associated with pathobiological features, but rather over-representation of local area induced by stochastic founder events or by potential sampling bias (see Fig 1B).
Statistics of spatial dispersal estimated from continuous phylogeographic analyses are reported in Table 1. Estimation of diffusion coefficients [27] allows different outbreaks to be directly and quantitatively compared [19]. Specifically, we found that the diffusion coefficient of RABV in Yunnan (D = 1733 km2/year; 95% HPD = 1082–2928) is on average substantially lower than that previously estimated for RABV among North African dogs (D = 2874 km2/year; 95% HPD = 1900–5420) [28].
Table 1. RABV dispersion statistics estimated from continuous phylogeographic analyses.
Statistic | Definition | Median value | 95% HPD |
---|---|---|---|
vbranch | mean branch velocity | 57.5 km/year | [39.2, 85.1] |
vweighted | weighted dispersal velocity | 23.4 km/year | [2.4, 32.6] |
Doriginal | original diffusion coefficient (Pybus et al. 2012) | 1733 km2/year | [1082, 2928] |
Dweighted | weighted diffusion coefficient (Trovao et al. 2015) | 1064 km2/year | [116, 1638] |
Impact of environmental factors on spatial dispersal dynamics
Several environmental variables were tested as potential factors that could affect RABV lineage dispersal velocity. As detailed in Materials and Methods, we estimated the correlation between phylogenetic branch durations and environmental distances computed on different rasters (S1 Fig). These correlations were then compared to the correlation between branch durations and distance computed on a “null” raster (i.e. an empty raster with no spatial heterogeneity whose cell values are set uniformly to “1”). Finally, the difference between these two correlations was assessed using a randomisation procedure. The rationale of this approach was to investigate which environmental factors can explain dispersal velocity heterogeneity better than simple geographic distances [28–30]. Complete results are reported in S2 Table, and S2 Fig reports results for the environmental factors that are most likely to have impacted virus lineage dispersal velocity. Only the forest coverage variable, tested as a potential conductance factor, was associated with a Bayes factor > 20. Although significant, the correlation is weak: using the “forest coverage” raster to compute environmental distances only increases the correlation with branch durations by 3%, relative to the uniform null raster. This means that forest coverage (treated as a conductance factor) would be a minor contributor to the observed heterogeneity in virus lineage dispersal velocity.
In addition to the analyses investigating the impact of environmental factors on dispersal velocity, we also investigated the impact of these factors on the dispersal tendency, i.e. we investigated if lineage translocation events tended to terminate in particular environmental conditions. Specifically, we compared environmental values at the beginning (oldest node) and end (youngest node) of each branch. Differences between the environmental values at each end of phylogeny branches tested using a randomisation procedure (see Materials and Methods). This analysis also indicated a possible effect of the “forest coverage” variable (Table 2): RABV lineages tended to spread towards areas associated with lower forest coverage (BF > 20 when considering forest coverage to be a potential negative driver of dispersal). We also note the relative importance of croplands (positive driver, BF = 17.2) and inaccessibility (negative driver, BF = 12.5) factors, meaning that the virus lineages were also more likely to spread towards croplands and accessible areas.
Table 2. Impact of several environmental factors on RABV lineage dispersal tendency in Yunnan.
Environmental factor | BF when factors are treated as negative drivers |
BF when factors are treated as positive drivers |
---|---|---|
Inaccessibility | 12.5 | 0.1 |
Annual mean temperature | 0.9 | 1.1 |
Annual precipitation | 1.7 | 0.6 |
Croplands | 0.1 | 17.2 |
Elevation | 1.4 | 0.7 |
Foot print | 0.1 | 7.1 |
Forests | 21.2 | 0.0 |
Grasslands | 0.3 | 3.2 |
Human pop. density | 0.1 | 8.2 |
Savannas | 1.3 | 0.8 |
Urban areas | 0.1 | 6.6 |
Dynamic modelling from epidemiological data and dog surveillance
We used mathematical transmission models and data from human and dog surveillance of RABV outbreaks in Yunnan Province to quantify rabies spread in a rural area of China. Dog demography and human rabies data were collected by the Yunnan Institute of Endemic Disease Control and Prevention. Our model-based simulation of dog-to-human RABV transmission captures the rapid increase in human rabies at the end of the year 2000, reaching a peak around 2010, before rapidly declining from 2011 onwards (Fig 4). Moreover, we find that the simulated density of rabid dogs is highly correlated with reconstruction of viral effective population size through time. Table 3 shows the fitted parameters and values used in the model. Trace plots as well as Gelman and Rubin diagnostic indicate convergence of the MCMC chains [31] (S3 Fig). The estimated carrying capacity (K) is 13.59 dogs/km2 [95% credible interval (CI): 7.80–19.37 dogs/km2]. The dog-to-dog transmission rate (βd) is 6.62/year, [95% CI: 5.60–7.64/year]. The dog-to-human transmission rate (βdh) is 0.0004/year, [95% CI: 0.0002–0.0006/year]. The average basic reproductive number (R0) of the most recent wave of infection is estimated at 1.05 during the early stages of the outbreak. High values for the transmission parameters and initial conditions are positively correlated with a high peak of human rabies infections (S4 Table), and the simulations are sensitive to these parameters. Our precise field measures are crucial for reliable model simulations, in particular the dog-to-human transmission rate and dog population size.
Table 3. RABV epidemiological parameters estimated from occurrence data.
Parameter | Definition | Mean value | SD* | |
---|---|---|---|---|
bd | dog birth rate | 0.73/year | 0.12 | Estimated |
dd | dog death rate | 0.26/year | 0.12 | Estimated |
K | dog carrying capacity | 11.41 dogs/km2 | 0.83 | Estimated |
σd | 1/σd is the average latent period | 13.43/year | 1.82 | Estimated |
αd | death rate of rabid dogs | 63.96/year | 1.96 | Estimated |
βd | dog-to-dog transmission rate | 6.62/year | 0.52 | Estimated |
βdh | dog-to-human transmission rate | 0.0004/year | 0.0001 | Estimated |
S0 | initial susceptible dog population size | 9.50 dogs/km2 | 0.96 | Estimated |
E0 | initial exposed dog population size | 0.003 dogs/km2 | 0.003 | Estimated |
I0 | initial infectious dog population size | 0.003 dogs/km2 | 0.003 | Estimated |
vd | dog vaccination rate | 0.07/year [32] | - | Fixed |
e | dog vaccination success rate | 0.60/year [32] | - | Fixed |
λd | dog loss of vaccination immunity rate | 1/year [33] | - | Fixed |
λh | human loss of vaccination immunity rate | 1/year | - | Fixed |
σh | 1/σh is the average human incubation period | 6/year [34] | - | Fixed |
αh | rabid humans mortality rate | 1/year | - | Fixed |
bh | human birth rate | 0.013/year [35] | - | Fixed |
dh | human mortality rate | 0.006/year [35] | - | Fixed |
*standard deviation
Discussion
Human rabies is one of the biggest public health risks facing China. While current rabies surveillance mostly reflects the RABV prevalence in humans, very little is known about its prevalence in dogs. In most of mainland China, diagnosis of dog rabies is currently effectively impossible in rural areas [8], because dogs are not leashed, can move freely and have a low vaccination coverage [6]. Because of this, rural dog populations are at increased risk of exposure and are crucial to rabies prevention and control efforts as they are the main reservoir for zoonoses [36]. Analysis of high-resolution epidemiological and genomic data provides an opportunity to explore the dynamics of re-emerging rabies dispersal and RABV transmission.
Continuous phylogeographic analyses yield a lower diffusion coefficient than that previously estimated for dog RABV in northern Africa [19,28]. Previous analysis of the northern Africa data set also revealed the importance of human-related environmental factors (human population density, accessibility to nearest major cities) as explanatory factors for the heterogeneity in RABV lineage dispersal velocity in Africa [28]. The higher diffusion coefficient of the northern African RABV data set was thus suspected to be related to human-based connectivity and/or mobility. Consequently, the lower diffusion coefficient estimated for the Yunnan data set could, in turn, indicate that human-related movements are less important contributors to the spatial dissemination of RABV in Yunnan, although we note that this is only one possible interpretation. Here, we also investigated the potential impact of several environmental factors and found a significant but weak effect of forest coverage acting (directly or indirectly) as a factor favouring RABV lineage dispersal velocity in Yunnan. One potential interpretation of this result is that in sparsely populated forest areas a few rapid (and potentially human-related) movements of infected dogs may have occurred. Such lineage dispersal movements could have happened via the road network crossing forest areas. However, even if identified as a significant conductance factor, the forest coverage in itself is not necessarily the causal factor and could instead be correlated with the true causal factor that is not included in the present analysis.
The potential importance of forest coverage was further indicated by comparing environmental conditions at branch termination locations. This analysis mainly revealed that viral lineages did not tend to spread towards forest areas. However, this result could also reflect, to some extent, the impact of a potential sampling bias arising if there were a lower sampling probability in less densely human-populated regions, such as forest areas. Furthermore, even under the assumption that viral lineages would be less likely to spread towards forest areas, our analysis based on dispersal velocity revealed that these areas do not act as barriers decreasing lineages dispersal velocity among infected areas.
Our dynamic model provides estimates of epidemiological parameters for dog rabies in Yunnan. The simulated dog population indicated a low level of RABV transmission, different from the oscillations observed in N’Djamena, Africa [11]. We also obtained an estimate of the transmission rate among dogs (βd), and from dogs to humans (βdh); key epidemiological parameters for assessment of rabies outbreaks and incidence among dogs. The estimate (βd) of 6.62/year was higher than the 4.20/year estimated in N’Djamena, Chad [34], and lower than 14.68/year estimated in Machakos District, Kenya [37,38]. The transmission rate from dogs to humans (βdh) was estimated to be 0.0004/year, which is consistent with our field investigation of dog bites (0.0004/year) in the study area [39], but much lower than the 0.0107/year estimated in N’Djamena [34]. In addition, the estimated carrying capacity (13.59 dogs/km2, 95% CI: 7.80–19.37 dogs/km2) was also lower than 33.6 dogs/km2 estimated in N’Djamena, Chad, but was similar to the value estimated in Tamil Nadu, India (12.69 dogs/km2, estimated using livestock census data) [40]. We suspect these may result from socio-economic differences, e.g. human population density [41].
Despite a national rabies control and prevention program that was implemented in China in 1985, which resulted in a drastic reduction in human rabies cases in the 1990s, a new RABV epidemic started in China in 1999 (Fig 1). Phylogeographic reconstructions confirm the East-to-West invasion history of RABV in Yunnan, which was previously suggested by epidemiological records [25]. Furthermore, we find a time lag between the peaks of viral effective population size and the corresponding peaks of rabid dog numbers (Fig 4). This may be due to the substantial proportion of undetected dog rabies infections; epidemiological surveillance of dog rabies in the region is far from exhaustive.
This study illustrates how RABV dispersion dynamics can be analysed by two complementary approaches based on genetic and epidemiological data. Overall, our work further highlights that domestic dogs play a key role in transmission and expansion of rabies in rural areas of China. The data reveal a low level of RABV transmission among dogs, and from dogs to humans, with the basic reproductive number estimated at 1.05 during the early stages of the outbreak. Our results indicate that interventions in the dog population would be effective in reducing transmission to humans, in particular because they have the potential to subvert the self-sustaining capacity of epidemics in dogs. A better understanding of RABV spread in terms of spatial and temporal dynamics is necessary to help inform the prevention and control of human rabies in the vast rural areas of China.
Material and methods
Ethics statement
It was determined by the Yunnan Institute of Endemic Diseases Control and Prevention, that the collection of data from rabies cases was part of continuing public health surveillance of a notifiable infectious disease and was exempt from institutional review board assessment. Experimental procedures were performed in compliance with guidelines established by the Chinese Center For Disease Control And Prevention and have been approved by ethics committee of Yunnan Institute of Endemic Diseases Control and Prevention.
New samples from Yunnan
From 2008 to 2015, we collected 1392 brain tissue samples. These samples were obtained from 252 dogs suspected of having rabies, 1129 apparently healthy domestic dogs, 2 cows, and 9 human patients within 24 hours of death in 14 prefectures and 43 counties of Yunnan Province (Fig 1B). In addition, 18 saliva samples and 1 cerebrospinal fluid sample were obtained from surviving patients.
All brain specimens were tested using direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) and RABV nucleoprotein monoclonal antibody (Rabies DFA Reagent; Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA). Total RNA was extracted from the original brain samples with the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions [25]. PCR products were purified by using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). Complete nucleoprotein gene (N gene; 1 cow, 84 dog and 6 human isolates) and glycoprotein gene (G gene; 2 cow, 110 dog and 8 human isolates) sequences were obtained by using previously described primers [21,42]. Newly generated RABV sequence data were submitted to GenBank (accession numbers KP072009–KP072030, KP202418- KP202448, KT932670-KT932698 and KX096992-KX097000 for N gene, and JF819597-JF819602, JQ040570-JQ040581, JX276383-JX276404, KP072031-KP072052, KP202402-KP202417, KT861554-KT861586 and KX096983–KX096991 for G gene). An overview of the newly sequenced isolates is provided in S1 Table.
Incidence data from the Yunnan RABV epidemic
Human rabies case records (Fig 1A) in Yunnan from 1999 to 2015 were obtained from the Yunnan Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Chinese CDC. In China, human rabies is a class B notifiable infectious disease and all human cases must be reported to the Chinese CDC. Rabies cases were confirmed according to diagnostic criteria (WS281–2008) from the Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China.
Discrete phylogeographic analyses
To identify Yunnan-specific RABV circulation, nucleotide sequences of the N and G genes of all available RABV sequences sampled from non-flying mammals in Asia were downloaded from NCBI GenBank and aligned [43] together with our newly generated sequences. The resulting data sets included 543 N sequences (the entire N gene coding sequence, 1350 nt long) and 491 G sequences (the entire G gene coding sequence, 1575 nt long). RABV clades specific to Yunnan were identified using the discrete trait analysis model implemented in BEAST 1.8 [44,45]. For the molecular clock phylogeographic analyses, we specified a general time-reversible GTR+I nucleotide substitution model [46–48], a skygrid coalescent model [49] and a relaxed uncorrelated lognormal (UCLN) molecular clock model across branches [50]. The data sets lack a clear temporal signal [51] (S1 Fig). Therefore, we specified informative prior distributions on the gene-specific mean clock rate parameter. These prior distributions were based on previously published estimated substitution rates [52]: 1.88×10−4 substitutions/site/year (95% highest posterior density, HPD: [1.37×10−4, 2.41×10−4]) for the N gene and 2.13×10−4 substitutions/site/year (95% HPD: [1.56×10−4, 2.73×10−4]) for the G gene. The MCMC chain was run for 250 million states and mixing and convergence were inspected using Tracer [http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/]. TreeAnnotator 1.8 [44] was used to infer maximum clade credibility (MCC) summary trees.
Testing covariates of viral population size
We used the GLM (generalised linear model) extension of the skygrid coalescent model [53], implemented in BEAST 1.8, to simultaneously infer viral effective population sizes and measure the association between estimated effective population size and cases counts. For this analysis, we focused only on sequences associated with the largest Yunnan clade identified by the discrete phylogeographic analysis (clade YN-A1, see the Results section). Furthermore, we considered the N and G genes as two independent markers (see Appendix S1 in S1 Text for the detailed procedure).
Continuous phylogeographic analyses
The history of virus lineage dispersal in Yunnan was recovered from geo-referenced phylogenies, which were estimated using the continuous phylogeographic method [26] implemented in BEAST 1.8. A separate continuous phylogeographic analysis was performed for each gene and each Yunnan clade identified by the preliminary discrete phylogeographic analyses; however, the nucleotide substitution and molecular clock models were linked across the clades to avoid over-parameterisation. For these models, we used the same models as described above, together with a relaxed random walk model for inference of the continuous spatial locations. This relaxed random walk model assumed a log-normal probability distribution among phylogeny branches of diffusion rate scalars. The spatiotemporal information contained in inferred phylogenetic trees was extracted with the R package “seraphim” [29,30]. For the present study, we extracted spatiotemporal information from a subset of 1,000 trees sampled at regular intervals from the posterior distribution of trees (after burn-in had been removed). This was done for each gene and for each Yunnan clade. After this extraction step, each phylogeny branch is represented as a distinct movement vector [27]. “seraphim” was also used to estimate statistics of spatial dispersal based on these extracted movement vectors. We estimated the mean branch velocity, the weighted dispersal velocity, the diffusion coefficient (as originally defined in Pybus et al. [27]) and the weighted diffusion coefficient (as defined by Trovão et al. [54]). Further details regarding these statistics can be found in the “seraphim” package [30].
Impact of environmental factors on spatial dispersal dynamics
We next sought to investigate the impact of environmental factors on lineage dispersal velocity. These analyses followed a similar structure to those used in previous studies [28,29,55]. All scripts for these analyses are available in the R package “seraphim” [30]. Here, we investigated the impact of the following environmental variables (S1 Fig): elevation, annual mean temperature, annual precipitation, key land cover variables (e.g. “grasslands”, “savannas”, “forests”, “croplands”, “urban areas”; land cover categorised according to the International Geosphere Biosphere Program, IGBP), human population density, human footprint, major roads, and inaccessibility (quantified as the time it takes to travel to the nearest major city of >50,000 inhabitants). The sources of the data in the original raster files are listed in S3 Table. All factors were tested as potential conductance factors (i.e. factors facilitating movement) and as potential resistance factors (i.e. factors impeding movement). Correlations between phylogenetic branch durations and environmentally-scaled distances were quantified as a statistic Q, which represents the difference between two coefficients of determination (R2): (i) the R2 obtained when branch durations are regressed against environmentally-scaled distances, and (ii) the R2 obtained when branch durations are regressed against distances computed on a “null” raster, i.e. a raster with a value of “1” assigned to every cell. An environmental factor was only considered as potentially explanatory if both its distribution of regression coefficients and its associated distribution of Q values were positive [56]. In a positive distribution of estimated Q values (i.e. with at least 90% of positive values), statistical support was then evaluated against a null distribution generated by a randomisation procedure and formalised using a Bayes factor (BF) value [28] (see Appendix S2 in S1 Text for the full procedure). Due to computational limits, this analysis was based on 100 trees subsampled from each post-burn-in posterior distribution obtained by continuous phylogeographic inference.
Addition to the analyses based on lineage dispersal velocity, we also used a new analytical procedure to investigate the impact of several environmental factors on dispersal tendency. In order words, this procedure aims at testing if virus lineages tend to disperse towards particular environmental conditions. In this framework, environmental conditions are compared between the locations of the two nodes connected by a phylogeny branch. For each branch and environmental factor, we computed the difference in raster cell values between the start (oldest node) location and at the end (youngest node) location. These differences were then averaged within each sampled tree and evaluated against a null distribution generated by the same randomisation procedure used for the analyses of the impact on dispersal velocity (see Appendix S3 in S1 Text for the detailed procedure).
Dynamic modelling based on epidemiological data and dog surveillance
In the dynamic modelling part of this study, we extended the discrete susceptible-exposed-infectious (SEI) model for dog rabies [10,11,34]. Our discrete-time model framework was developed by dividing a closed dog population into four rabies classes, susceptible (Sd), exposed (Ed), and infectious (Id), and vaccinated (Vd). We then extended the model for dog rabies to include dog-to-human RABV transmission. A similar modelling framework has been applied to quantitatively assess the dynamics of RABV transmission [34]. Sh is the number of people susceptible to disease, Ph is the annual vaccinated individuals in Yunnan (based on medical records from Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention), Eh and Vh represents the number of exposed humans and immunized humans during the time period, respectively.
[1] |
[2] |
[3] |
[4] |
[5] |
[6] |
[7] |
[8] |
where Nd is the total dog population (Sd + Ed + Id + Vd). Dog population growth is considered to be density-dependent, with birth (bd) and death (dd) rates. The density-dependent mortality parameter (γ) is a function of the dog population growth rate per year (bd—dd) and the carrying capacity density of the dog population in km-2 (K) is defined by γ = (bd—dd) / K. Carrying capacity is defined as the maximum number or density of individuals that can be sustainably supported by a given environment. In rural areas of China, many domestic dogs are free-roaming and there has been no population control for most of the time. We can then assume that dog populations (including owned and stray dogs) are regulated through represented by carrying capacity determined by some unknown combination of environmental and human geographic factors. βd and βdh are the dog-to-dog and dog-to-human transmission rate, respectively. σd is the latent-to-infectious rate per year and α is the rabies-induced mortality. At the beginning (t = 0), the basic reproductive number (R0) is σβdS0/((σ+b)(α+b)). Informative prior distributions are assumed for death rate for rabid dog/human, latent period, incubation period, as well as dog-to-human transmission rate (βdh), which is assessed from our field investigation of dog bites [39]. We assumed dog vaccination rate (v) of 0.07 and dog vaccination success rate (e) of 0.60 in Yunnan by previous surveillance [32]. λ is loss of vaccination immunity rate. Culling was simulated assuming the elimination of 1% of the total dog population based on empirical estimation, due to the temporal irregular and changing intensity of potential culling. The susceptible reconstruction provided initial estimates of the initial susceptible dog population size, Sd,0, for which we chose a uniform prior of 5–15 dogs/km2, according to our surveillance [32]. Initial numbers for Ed,0 and Id,0 were unknown and fitted in the model with a wide prior 0–1 dogs/km2.
We fitted the dynamic model using the Bayesian state space framework using Metropolis-Hastings Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms implemented in the MATLAB (vR2009b) toolbox DRAM (Delayed Rejection Adaptive Metropolis) [57,58]. The chain was initiated using published estimates of dog demography and RABV transmission rates [34,38,59–61] with an uninformative prior that varied from 0 to infinity, and then was run for 5 million iterations and sampled every 5000th step, after a burn-in of 500,000 iterations.
Sensitivity analysis was performed using latin hypercube sampling (LHS) and partial rank correlation coefficient (PRCC) techniques [62]. Two criteria were retained as outputs for the analysis: the intensity of the peak of the human rabies infections and the date of the peak. Uniform distributions were used for all parameters and the same ranges as for the prior distributions were used. A total of 1,000 parameter sets were sampled with LHS and PRCC was estimated using the MATLAB code provided by Marino et al. [63].
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on this manuscript. We are also grateful to Anna Virginia Black Mazzarella for her valuable comments and help. We thank the hundreds of Yunnan Institute of Endemic Diseases Control and Prevention staff and local health workers in Yunnan Province who collected data during 1999–2015.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. All sequences generated in this study are available in GenBank under accession numbers listed in S1 Table.
Funding Statement
Funding for this study was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81673234, 41476161), http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/; the Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds KU Leuven (BOF) (No. OT/14/115), https://www.kuleuven.be/onderzoek/ondersteuning/if; the VIROGENESIS project (receiving funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement number 634650), https://www.kuleuven.be/english/research/EU/p/horizon2020/sc/sc1/Virogenesis; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, http://www.moe.gov.cn/; National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0600104), http://www.most.gov.cn/; Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Beijing Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars), http://kw.beijing.gov.cn/jjb/; the China Association for Science and Technology Youth Talent Lift Project, http://www.cast.org.cn/; European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/European Research Council grant agreement number 614725-PATHPHYLODYN and under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, grant agreement no. 725422-ReservoirDOCS, https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/; BV and SD were funded by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO, Belgium), http://www.fwo.be/ (G066215N, G0D5117N and G0B9317N); SD is also supported by the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS, Belgium). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Fooks AR, Banyard AC, Horton DL, Johnson N, McElhinney LM, et al. (2014) Current status of rabies and prospects for elimination. Lancet 384: 1389–1399. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62707-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hampson K, Cleaveland S, Briggs D (2011) Evaluation of cost-effective strategies for rabies post-exposure vaccination in low-income countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e982 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Knobel DL, Cleaveland S, Coleman PG, Fèvre EM, Meltzer MI, et al. (2005) Re-evaluating the burden of rabies in Africa and Asia. Bull World Health Organ 83: 360–368. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhou H, Vong S, Liu K, Li Y, Mu D, et al. (2016) Human rabies in China, 1960–2014: A descriptive epidemiological study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10: e0004874 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ma C, Hao X, Deng H, Wu R, Liu J, et al. (2017) Re‐emerging of rabies in Shaanxi Province, China, 2009 to 2015. J Med Virol: 10.1002/jmv.24769 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tang X, Luo M, Zhang S, Fooks AR, Hu R, et al. (2005) Pivotal role of dogs in rabies transmission, China. Emerg Infect Dis 11: 1970–1972. 10.3201/eid1112.050271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Deng Z, Qiu H, Hong J (2011) Factors related to rabies prevalence in Kunming City from 1981 to 2010. China Tropical Medicine 11: 1251–1252. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hu R, Tang Q, Tang J, Fooks AR (2009) Rabies in China: an update. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 9: 1–12. 10.1089/vbz.2008.0046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cleaveland S, Kaare M, Knobel D, Laurenson MK (2006) Canine vaccination—providing broader benefits for disease control. Vet Microbiol 117: 43–50. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Anderson R, Jackson H, May R, Smith A (1981) Population dynamics of fox rabies in Europe. Nature 289: 765–771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hampson K, Dushoff J, Bingham J, Brückner G, Ali Y, et al. (2007) Synchronous cycles of domestic dog rabies in sub-Saharan Africa and the impact of control efforts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 7717–7722. 10.1073/pnas.0609122104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Murray J, Stanley E, Brown D (1986) On the spatial spread of rabies among foxes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 229: 111–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Childs JE, Curns AT, Dey ME, Real LA, Feinstein L, et al. (2000) Predicting the local dynamics of epizootic rabies among raccoons in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 13666–13671. 10.1073/pnas.240326697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Russell CA, Smith DL, Waller LA, Childs JE, Real LA (2004) A priori prediction of disease invasion dynamics in a novel environment. Proc Biol Sci 271: 21–25. 10.1098/rspb.2003.2559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Smith DL, Lucey B, Waller LA, Childs JE, Real LA (2002) Predicting the spatial dynamics of rabies epidemics on heterogeneous landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 3668–3672. 10.1073/pnas.042400799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hampson K, Dushoff J, Cleaveland S, Haydon DT, Kaare M, et al. (2009) Transmission dynamics and prospects for the elimination of canine rabies. PLoS Biol 7: e1000053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Biek R, Henderson JC, Waller LA, Rupprecht CE, Real LA (2007) A high-resolution genetic signature of demographic and spatial expansion in epizootic rabies virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 7993–7998. 10.1073/pnas.0700741104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Real LA, Henderson JC, Biek R, Snaman J, Jack TL, et al. (2005) Unifying the spatial population dynamics and molecular evolution of epidemic rabies virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 12107–12111. 10.1073/pnas.0500057102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Talbi C, Lemey P, Suchard MA, Abdelatif E, Elharrak M, et al. (2010) Phylodynamics and human-mediated dispersal of a zoonotic virus. PLoS Pathog 6: e1001166 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yao H-W, Yang Y, Liu K, Li X-L, Zuo S-Q, et al. (2015) The spatiotemporal expansion of human rabies and its probable explanation in mainland China, 2004–2013. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9: e0003502 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tao X, Tang Q, Li H, Mo Z, Zhang H, et al. (2009) Molecular epidemiology of rabies in Southern People’s Republic of China. Emerg Infect Dis 15: 1192–1198. 10.3201/eid1508.081551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bourhy H, Nakouné E, Hall M, Nouvellet P, Lepelletier A, et al. (2016) Revealing the micro-scale signature of endemic zoonotic disease transmission in an African urban setting. PLoS Pathog 12: e1005525 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Duke-Sylvester SM, Biek R, Real LA (2013) Molecular evolutionary signatures reveal the role of host ecological dynamics in viral disease emergence and spread. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368: 20120194 10.1098/rstb.2012.0194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brunker K, Marston DA, Horton DL, Cleaveland S, Fooks AR, et al. (2015) Elucidating the phylodynamics of endemic rabies virus in eastern Africa using whole-genome sequencing. Virus Evol 1: vev011 10.1093/ve/vev011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang H, Zhang Y, Yang W, Tao X, Li H, et al. (2014) Molecular epidemiology of reemergent rabies in Yunnan Province, southwestern China. Emerg Infect Dis 20: 1433 10.3201/eid2009.130440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lemey P, Rambaut A, Welch JJ, Suchard MA (2010) Phylogeography takes a relaxed random walk in continuous space and time. Mol Biol Evol 27: 1877–1885. 10.1093/molbev/msq067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pybus OG, Suchard MA, Lemey P, Bernardin FJ, Rambaut A, et al. (2012) Unifying the spatial epidemiology and molecular evolution of emerging epidemics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 15066–15071. 10.1073/pnas.1206598109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dellicour S, Rose R, Faria NR, Vieira LFP, Bourhy H, et al. (2017) Using viral gene sequences to compare and explain the heterogeneous spatial dynamics of virus epidemics. Mol Biol Evol: 10.1093/molbev/msx1176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dellicour S, Rose R, Pybus OG (2016) Explaining the geographic spread of emerging epidemics: a framework for comparing viral phylogenies and environmental landscape data. BMC bioinformatics 17: 82 10.1186/s12859-016-0924-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dellicour S, Rose R, Faria NR, Lemey P, Pybus OG (2016) SERAPHIM: studying environmental rasters and phylogenetically-informed movements. Bioinformatics 32: 3204–3206. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Laneri K, Bhadra A, Ionides EL, Bouma M, Dhiman RC, et al. (2010) Forcing versus feedback: epidemic malaria and monsoon rains in northwest India. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000898 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dong G, Ma K, Zhang W, Yang P (2011) Current situation and control of rabies in Yunnan Province. Modern Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine: 32–33. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lv Y, Lv S (2012) Some thoughts on rabies disease prevention in Yunnan Province. Yunnan Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine: 44–45. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zinsstag J, Dürr S, Penny M, Mindekem R, Roth F, et al. (2009) Transmission dynamics and economics of rabies control in dogs and humans in an African city. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 14996–15001. 10.1073/pnas.0904740106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Statistical Bureau of Yunnan Province (2015) Yunan statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Press. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zinsstag J, Lechenne M, Laager M, Mindekem R, Oussiguéré A, et al. (2017) Vaccination of dogs in an African city interrupts rabies transmission and reduces human exposure. Sci Transl Med 9: eaaf6984 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kitala P, McDermott J, Kyule M, Gathuma J, Perry B, et al. (2001) Dog ecology and demography information to support the planning of rabies control in Machakos District, Kenya. Acta Trop 78: 217–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kitala P, McDermott J, Kyule M, Gathuma J (2000) Community-based active surveillance for rabies in Machakos District, Kenya. Prev Vet Med 44: 73–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hu Q, Hu H, Zhang Y, Wu X, Yang W, et al. (2016) Analysis of a surveillance system based on aggressive dog attack incidents in chuxiong prefecture. J Med Pest Control 32: 1005–1007. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fitzpatrick MC, Shah HA, Pandey A, Bilinski AM, Kakkar M, et al. (2016) One Health approach to cost-effective rabies control in India. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113: 14574–14581. 10.1073/pnas.1604975113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gwatkin DR, Rutstein S, Johnson K, Suliman E, Wagstaff A, et al. (2007) Socio-economic differences in health, nutrition, and population within developing countries Washington, DC: World Bank. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yu J, Li H, Tang Q, Rayner S, Han N, et al. (2012) The spatial and temporal dynamics of rabies in China. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1640 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30: 772–780. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A (2012) Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol 29: 1969–1973. 10.1093/molbev/mss075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lemey P, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Suchard MA (2009) Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000520 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yang Z (1994) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol 39: 306–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tavaré S (1986) Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences In: Miura R. M., editor. Some Mathematical Questions in Biology—DNA Sequence Analysis. Providence, RI: Amer Math Soc; pp. 57–86. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shoemaker J, Fitch W (1989) Evidence from nuclear sequences that invariable sites should be considered when sequence divergence is calculated. Mol Biol Evol 6: 270–289. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gill MS, Lemey P, Faria NR, Rambaut A, Shapiro B, et al. (2013) Improving Bayesian population dynamics inference: a coalescent-based model for multiple loci. Mol Biol Evol 30: 713–724. 10.1093/molbev/mss265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Drummond AJ, Ho SY, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A (2006) Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol 4: e88 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rambaut A, Lam TT, Carvalho LM, Pybus OG (2016) Exploring the temporal structure of heterochronous sequences using TempEst (formerly Path-O-Gen). Virus Evol 2: vew007 10.1093/ve/vew007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang Y, Vrancken B, Feng Y, Dellicour S, Yang Q, et al. (2017) Cross-border spread, lineage displacement and evolutionary rate estimation of rabies virus in Yunnan Province, China. Virol J 14: 102 10.1186/s12985-017-0769-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gill MS, Lemey P, Bennett SN, Biek R, Suchard MA (2016) Understanding past population dynamics: Bayesian coalescent-based modeling with covariates. Syst Biol 65: 1041–1056. 10.1093/sysbio/syw050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Trovão NS, Suchard MA, Baele G, Gilbert M, Lemey P (2015) Bayesian inference reveals host-specific contributions to the epidemic expansion of Influenza A H5N1. Mol Biol Evol 32: 3264–3275. 10.1093/molbev/msv185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Laenen L, Dellicour S, Vergote V, Nauwelaers I, De Coster S, et al. (2016) Spatio‐temporal analysis of Nova virus, a divergent hantavirus circulating in the European mole in Belgium. Mol Ecol 25: 5994–6008. 10.1111/mec.13887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jacquot M, Nomikou K, Palmarini M, Mertens P, Biek R (2017) Bluetongue virus spread in Europe is a consequence of climatic, landscape and vertebrate host factors as revealed by phylogeographic inference. Proc Biol Sci 284: 20170919 10.1098/rspb.2017.0919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chib S, Greenberg E (1995) Understanding the metropolis-hastings algorithm. Am Stat 49: 327–335. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Haario H, Laine M, Mira A, Saksman E (2006) DRAM: efficient adaptive MCMC. Stat Comput 16: 339–354. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cleaveland S, Dye C (1995) Maintenance of a microparasite infecting several host species: rabies in the Serengeti. Parasitology 111: S33–S47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kitala P, McDermott J, Coleman P, Dye C (2002) Comparison of vaccination strategies for the control of dog rabies in Machakos District, Kenya. Epidemiol Infect 129: 215–222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hua M, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Liu R, Yang W, et al. (2013) Rabies virus carriage in domestic dogs and distribution of positive dogs in Lufenng, Yunnan. Disease Surveillance 28: 853–856. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Blower SM, Dowlatabadi H (1994) Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of complex models of disease transmission: an HIV model, as an example. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique 62: 229–243. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Marino S, Hogue IB, Ray CJ, Kirschner DE (2008) A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. J Theor Biol 254: 178–196. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. All sequences generated in this study are available in GenBank under accession numbers listed in S1 Table.