The draft genome sequence of an anaerobic fermenting bacterium, “Sphaerochaeta halotolerans” strain 4-11T, isolated from formation water of a low-temperature petroleum reservoir in Russia is presented. The genome is annotated to elucidate the taxonomic position of the strain 4-11T and to extend the public genome database.
ABSTRACT
The draft genome sequence of an anaerobic fermenting bacterium, “Sphaerochaeta halotolerans” strain 4-11T, isolated from formation water of a low-temperature petroleum reservoir in Russia is presented. The genome is annotated to elucidate the taxonomic position of the strain 4-11T and to extend the public genome database.
ANNOUNCEMENT
The genus Sphaerochaeta of the family Spirochaetaceae comprises free-living anaerobic, mesophilic, neutrophilic, nonmotile bacteria, usually coccoid in shape, with fermentative metabolism (1). Four species are presently known, including Sphaerochaeta globosa, Sphaerochaeta pleomorpha, Sphaerochaeta coccoides (previously Spirochaeta coccoides), and Sphaerochaeta associata (2–4). Members of the genus Sphaerochaeta were isolated from freshwater sediments, methanogenic enrichments, wastewater sludge, and other anoxic habitats. Few pure cultures of the family Spirochaetaceae, namely Sediminispirochaeta smaragdinae (previously Spirochaeta smaragdinae) and Pleomorphochaeta caudata, have been isolated from oilfields (1, 5, 6).
Strain 4-11T (=VKM B-3269) belonging to the genus Sphaerochaeta was isolated from production water of a low-temperature Vostochno-Anzirskoe oilfield in Russia (7). The strain was isolated in a peptone-glucose medium supplemented with NaCl to the final concentration of 40 g/liter at 35°C. Bacterial cells were nonmotile, spherical, ovoid, and pleomorphic with a diameter of 1 to 3 µm. The strain was an anaerobic chemoorganoheterotroph using a wide range of monosaccharides, disaccharides, and trisaccharides as carbon and energy sources. Strain 4-11T grew optimally at 35°C, pH 6.0 to 6.5, and 10 g/liter NaCl. Phylogenetic analyses based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain 4-11T formed an independent branch within the genus Sphaerochaeta (7), sharing 96.8% and 96.4% similarity, respectively, with the genes of most closely related type strains S. associata GLS2T and S. globosa BuddyT. In order to determine the taxonomic position of the new strain, its genome was sequenced and annotated.
For the isolation of genomic DNA, strain 4-11T was anaerobically cultivated in a peptone-glucose medium supplemented with 4% (wt/vol) NaCl (7) at 35°C. Cells were harvested from 2 liter culture medium by centrifugation after 7 days of incubation, and the cell pellet was stored frozen (−20°C) until DNA preparation. Genomic DNA was extracted according to the method of Wilson (8), with minor modifications. Libraries were constructed with the NEBNext DNA library prep reagent set for Illumina, according to the protocol for the kit. Sequencing was carried out using the Illumina HiSeq 1500 platform with 250-bp single-end reads. Raw reads were quality checked with FastQC v.11.7 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/), and low-quality reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic v. 0.36 (9). Subsequently, the quality-filtered reads were de novo assembled with SPAdes v. 3.11.0 using the default settings (10).
A total of 1,393,290 reads were assembled into 49 contigs. This represented a 119× average coverage of the total sequence length of 2,927,075 bp. The largest contig was 334,155 bp, with an N50 value of 187,017 bp and a G+C content of 46.7%. Annotations of the contigs were carried out using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (11).
The draft genome sequence of strain 4-11T contained 2,788 genes, of which 2,698 were coding sequences, 34 were pseudogenes, and 45 were coded tRNAs. The 16S rRNA gene sequence revealed that the genome was identical to that determined earlier for the strain (7). The genome contained the genes associated with fermentation and carbohydrate metabolism. The average nucleotide identities (ANI) between strain 4-11T and S. associata GLS2T and S. globosa BuddyT were 76.6% and 76.1%, respectively, and were below the <95% to 96% cutoff, which is generally accepted for species differentiation (12). Thus, the draft genome sequence of strain 4-11T provides information about its affiliation with novel species within the genus Sphaerochaeta, with the proposed name “Sphaerochaeta halotolerans.”
Data availability.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. QUWK00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, QUWK01000000. The raw FASTQ reads have been deposited in the NCBI SRA database under the run no. SRR8109312.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (RSF) through grant 16-14-00028. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
REFERENCES
- 1.Magot M, Fardeau M-L, Arnauld O, Lanau C, Ollivier B, Thomas P, Patel BKC. 2006. Spirochaeta smaragdinae sp. nov., a new mesophilic strictly anaerobic spirochete from an oil field. FEMS Microbiol Lett 155:185–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb13876.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ritalahti KM, Justicia-Leon SD, Cusick KD, Ramos-Hernandez N, Rubin M, Dornbush J, Loffler FE. 2012. Sphaerochaeta globosa gen. nov., sp. nov. and Sphaerochaeta pleomorpha sp. nov., free-living, spherical spirochaetes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:210–216. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.023986-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abt B, Han C, Scheuner C, Lu M, Lapidus A, Nolan M, Lucas S, Hammon N, Deshpande S, Cheng J-F, Tapia R, Goodwin LA, Pitluck S, Liolios K, Pagani I, Ivanova N, Mavromatis K, Mikhailova N, Huntemann M, Pati A, Chen A, Palaniappan K, Land M, Hauser L, Brambilla E-M, Rohde M, Spring S, Gronow S, Göker M, Woyke T, Bristow J, Eisen JA, Markowitz V, Hugenholtz P, Kyrpides NC, Klenk H-P, Detter JC. 2012. Complete genome sequence of the termite hindgut bacterium Spirochaeta coccoides type strain (SPN1T), reclassification in the genus Sphaerochaeta as Sphaerochaeta coccoides comb. nov. and emendations of the family Spirochaetaceae and the genus Sphaerochaeta. Stand Genomic Sci 6:194–209. doi: 10.4056/sigs.2796069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Troshina O, Oshurkova V, Suzina N, Machulin A, Ariskina E, Vinokurova N, Kopitsyn D, Novikov A, Shcherbakova V. 2015. Sphaerochaeta associata sp. nov., a spherical spirochaete isolated from cultures of Methanosarcina mazei JL01. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:4315–4322. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shivani Y, Subhash Y, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. 2016. Description of “Candidatus Marispirochaeta associata” and reclassification of Spirochaeta bajacaliforniensis, Spirochaeta smaragdinae and Spirochaeta sinaica to a new genus Sediminispirochaeta gen. nov. as Sediminispirochaeta bajacaliforniensis comb. nov., Sediminispirochaeta smaragdinae comb. nov. and Sediminispirochaeta sinaica com. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:5485–5492. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Arroua B, Ranchou-Peyruse A, Ranchou-Peyruse M, Magot M, Urios L, Grimaud R. 2017. Pleomorphochaeta caudata gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterium isolated from an offshore oil well, reclassification of Sphaerochaeta multiformis MO-SPC2T as Pleomorphochaeta multiformis MO-SPC2T comb. nov. as the type strain of this novel genus and emended description of the genus Sphaerochaeta. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:417–424. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bidzhieva SKh, Sokolova DSh, Tourova TP, Nazina TN. 2018. Bacteria of the genus Sphaerochaeta from low-temperature heavy oil reservoirs (Russia). Microbiology (Moscow) 87:745–753. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wilson K. 2001. Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. Curr Protoc Mol Biol Chapter 2:Unit 2.4. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb0204s56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Ciufo S, Li W. 2013. Prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline In The NCBI handbook, 2nd ed National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, da Costa MS, Rooney AP, Yi H, Xu XW, De Meyer S, Trujillo ME. 2018. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:461–466. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. QUWK00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, QUWK01000000. The raw FASTQ reads have been deposited in the NCBI SRA database under the run no. SRR8109312.
