Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin is a host-adapted pathogen for cattle that can cause invasive disease in humans.
ABSTRACT
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin is a host-adapted pathogen for cattle that can cause invasive disease in humans. To facilitate genomic comparisons characterizing virulence determinants of this pathogen, we present the complete genome sequences of three S. Dublin strains isolated from bovine sources at harvest.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Salmonella enterica infection is a leading cause of enterocolitis for humans and animals (1). While Salmonella infections are usually self-limiting, invasive infection can occur in susceptible populations (infants, elderly, and immunocompromised individuals), and when the infection is caused by drug-resistant Salmonella spp., treatment options are limited. Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin is noted as a cattle-adapted Salmonella serotype, but it can cause disease in humans. A recent report on the epidemiology of S. Dublin demonstrated an increasing trend toward multidrug resistance (MDR) in strains isolated from humans in the United States from 1968 to 2013 and that infections caused by this serotype are more likely to be invasive than infections caused by other common Salmonella serotypes (2). However, the genetic determinants contributing to this invasive phenotype are not well understood. To facilitate comparative genomic studies examining the virulence traits and drug resistance determinants of this serotype, we present the complete closed genome and plasmid sequences for three MDR S. Dublin strains, with different plasmid content and/or drug resistance profiles. Strains 69807 and 69840 contain virulence plasmids (pSD2-69807 and pSD1-69840, respectively) that are nearly identical (99.96% pairwise identity) to the virulence plasmid in S. Dublin OU7409 and pSDVr (GenBank accession number DQ115388) (3), as well as IncA/C2 resistance plasmids (pSD1-69807 and pSD2-69840, respectively) harboring the resistance genes noted in Table 1. All strains were isolated from healthy cattle at harvest and confirmed as S. Dublin with antibody agglutination (4–6). Strains were cultured on tryptic soy agar at 37°C, and their susceptibility to 15 antimicrobial agents (as defined in the footnote of Table 1) was determined using the CMV2AGNF National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) test panel (Sensititre, Trek Diagnostics, Thermo Fischer), following manufacturer and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (7). Genomic DNA was purified with the Qiagen Genomic-tip 100/G columns and blood and cell culture DNA midi kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), using the manufacturer’s recommended protocol for overnight cultures grown statically at 37°C in tryptic soy broth (Becton, Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Single-molecule real-time sequencing libraries of bacterial DNA were constructed per the manufacturer’s protocol using C4/P6 (chemistry/polymerase) and sequenced using a Pacific Bioscience (PB) RS II instrument (Menlo Park, CA), producing average subreads of >5 kb and mean genome coverage of 159×. Genomes were assembled using the hierarchical genome assembly protocol (HGAP) version 3.0 with a minimum seed length of 6,000 (8). For each contig, a dot plot was constructed using Geneious version 11.1.3 (Biomatters Ltd., New Zealand) (9) to identify the overlapping region, which was trimmed from the 3′ end of the contig. OriFinder (10) was used to identify the origin of replication, which was set as nucleotide position 1. The trimmed and newly oriented sequences were validated using the PB RS_Resequencing pipeline to map the corresponding reads back to the new reference in order to generate consensus concordance assemblies (8). Plasmid Inc types were determined using the in silico typing tool PlasmidFinder version 1.3 (default settings, 95% identity [ID] threshold and 60% minimum length) (11). Multilocus sequence types (MLST) and MDR genotypes were determined using Salmonella in silico typing resource (SISTR) (12) and the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) (13), respectively. Genome and plasmid sequence data, as well as methylation data, were deposited into NCBI GenBank. Sequence data were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline.
TABLE 1.
Strain or plasmid | MLST | GenBank accession no. (SRA accession no.) |
No. of reads (fold coverage) |
Size (bp) | % GC content |
AMR phenotype | Inc type | Resistance gene(s)b | Isolation yr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USMARC-69807c | ST10 |
CP032379
(SRR8063632) |
75,195 (150×) | 4,844,213 | 52.2 | AmApFT (Ax)CSSuTe |
aac(6′)-laad | 2006e | |
pSD1-69807 | CP032380 | 1,058 (74×) | 96,567 | 52.8 | IncA/C2 |
blaCMY-2, sul2, blaTEM-81, floR, aph(3′′)-lb, aph(6)-ld, tet(C) |
|||
pSD2-69807 | CP032381 | 893 (66×) | 74,562 | 48.6 | IncX/IncFII | vga(C) | |||
USMARC-69838c ,f | ST10 |
CP032449
(SRR8064828) |
71,397 (150×) | 4,913,018 | 52.2 | AmApFTAxKCSSuTe |
blaCMY-2, blaCMY-2, sul2, blaTEM-81, aph(6)-ld, aph(3′′)-lb, aph(3′)-la, aac(6′)-laad , floR, tet(C) |
2012g | |
pSD1-69838 | CP032450 | 3,196 (195×) | 114,923 | 49.5 | IncA/C2; IncX/IncFII |
vga(C) | |||
USMARC-69840c | ST10 |
CP032446
(SRR8034318) |
83,212 (176×) | 4,844,133 | 52.2 | CKNaSSuTe | aac(6′)-laad | 2012g | |
pSD1-69840 | CP032447 | 1,275 (106×) | 74,560 | 48.6 | IncX; IncFII(s) | vga(C) | |||
pSD2-69840 | CP032448 | 652 (70×) | 77,171 | 53.4 | IncA/C2 |
floR, aph(6)-ld, aph(3′′)-lb, aph(3′)-la, sul2, tet(C) |
ST, sequence type; AMR, antimicrobial resistance; Am, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; Ap, ampicillin; F, cefoxitin; Ax, ceftriaxone; C, chloramphenicol; K, kanamycin; S, streptomycin; Su, sulfisoxazole; Sxt, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim; T, ceftiofur; Te, tetracycline; (), indicates intermediate resistance.
Resistance genes were identified using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (version 2.0.3) Resistance Gene Identifier (version 4.2.0) (13).
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin strain.
May be phenotypically silent (cryptic) and not generally noted as conferring aminoglycoside resistance (14).
Source: pre-evisceration carcass.
Two copies of blaCMY-2 present, DZA56_07580 and DZA56_07860.
Source: subiliac lymph node.
Data availability.
Accession numbers (for assemblies and raw reads), MLST, sizes, source data, plasmid Inc types, GC contents, and phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance phenotypes of the strains are listed in Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful for the technical assistance of Kerry Brader, Sandy Bradley, and Kristen Kuhn, as well as administrative assistance provided by Jody Gallagher.
The mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the USDA and does not imply approval to the exclusion of other products that might be suitable.
D.M.H., T.P.L.S., G.P.H., B.J.H., S.W.K., and J.A.S.V.K. are funded by the Agricultural Research Service of the United States Department of Agriculture.
REFERENCES
- 1.Economic Research Service. 2014. Cost estimates of foodborne illnesses. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC: https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/cost-estimates-of-foodborne-illnesses. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harvey RR, Friedman CR, Crim SM, Judd M, Barrett KA, Tolar B, Folster JP, Griffin PM, Brown AC. 2017. Epidemiology of Salmonella enterica serotype Dublin infections among humans, United States, 1968–2013. Emerg Infect Dis 23:1493–1501. doi: 10.3201/eid2309.170136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chu C, Feng Y, Chien AC, Hu S, Chu CH, Chiu CH. 2008. Evolution of genes on the Salmonella virulence plasmid phylogeny revealed from sequencing of the virulence plasmids of S. enterica serotype Dublin and comparative analysis. Genomics 92:339–343. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brichta-Harhay DM, Arthur TM, Bosilevac JM, Kalchayanand N, Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, Koohmaraie M. 2011. Diversity of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica strains associated with cattle at harvest in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:1783–1796. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01885-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Webb HE, Harhay DM, Brashears MM, Nightingale K, Arthur TM, Bosilevac JM, Kalchayanand N, Schmidt JW, Wang R, Granier SA, Brown TR, Edrington TS, Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, Loneragan GH. 2017. Salmonella in peripheral lymph nodes of healthy cattle at slaughter. Front Microbiol 8:2214. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grimont PAD, Weil FX. 2007. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars. Institut Pasteur & WHO Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Salmonella, Paris, France: https://www.pasteur.fr/sites/default/files/veng_0.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 7.CLSI. 2013. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standard, fourth edition CLSI document VET01-A4. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gao F, Zhang F. 2008. Ori-Finder: a Web-based system for finding oriCs in unannotated bacterial genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 9:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yoshida CE, Kruczkiewicz P, Laing CR, Lingohr EJ, Gannon VPJ, Nash JHE, Taboada EN. 2016. The Salmonella in silico typing resource (SISTR): an open Web-accessible tool for rapidly typing and subtyping draft Salmonella genome assemblies. PLoS One 11:e147101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P, Tsang KK, Lago BA, Dave BM, Pereira S, Sharma AN, Doshi S, Courtot M, Lo R, Williams LE, Frye JG, Elsayegh T, Sardar D, Westman EL, Pawlowski AC, Johnson TA, Brinkman FSL, Wright GD, McArthur AG. 2017. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance gene database. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D566–D573. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Magnet S, Courvalin P, Lambert T. 1999. Activation of the cryptic aac(6’)-Iy aminoglycoside resistance gene of Salmonella by a chromosomal deletion generating a transcriptional fusion. J Bacteriol 181:6650–6655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Accession numbers (for assemblies and raw reads), MLST, sizes, source data, plasmid Inc types, GC contents, and phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance phenotypes of the strains are listed in Table 1.