Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2018 Nov 29;7(21):e00965-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00965-18

Draft Genome Sequences of Nine Vibrio sp. Isolates from across the United States Closely Related to Vibrio cholerae

Mohammad Tarequl Islam a, Kevin Liang a, Monica S Im b,c, Jonathan Winkjer b,d, Shelby Busby b,c, Cheryl L Tarr b, Yan Boucher a,
Editor: John J Dennehye
PMCID: PMC6284734  PMID: 30533846

We are reporting whole-genome sequences of nine Vibrio sp. isolates closely related to the waterborne human pathogen Vibrio cholerae.

ABSTRACT

We are reporting whole-genome sequences of nine Vibrio sp. isolates closely related to the waterborne human pathogen Vibrio cholerae. These isolates were recovered from sources, including human samples, from different regions of the United States. Genome analysis suggests that this group of isolates represents a highly divergent basal V. cholerae lineage or a closely related novel species.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Vibrio is one of the most diverse and ubiquitous groups of marine bacteria, including species with significant clinical importance, such as Vibrio cholerae, which is the causative agent of the pandemic diarrheal disease cholera (1). Surveillance conducted under the Cholera and Other Vibrio Illness Surveillance (COVIS) program ( https://www.cdc.gov/vibrio/surveillance.html) revealed nine isolates indistinguishable from V. cholerae by traditional phenotypic tests but phylogenetically and genotypically divergent from that species.

Cultivation and laboratory identification of these strains based on rpoB sequence determination and phylogenetic reconstruction were done following standard procedures (2). Genomic DNA was extracted from the isolates using an ArchivePure DNA cell/tissue kit (5 PRIME) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing libraries were prepared from the genomic DNA using the Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq sequencing platforms (2 × 250-bp paired-end reads). Quality control and de novo assembly of the reads were done using default parameters in CLC Genomics workbench 7 (Qiagen). The average genome size was 3.9 Mbp with an average G+C content of 47.3%. Detailed isolate information is outlined in Table 1. Genome annotations were done using RAST 2.0 (3) and the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok/). Average nucleotide identity (ANI) and in silico DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values in comparison to those of the reference strains were calculated using JSpecies v1.2.1 (4) and Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC), respectively. Whole-genome alignment was performed using Mugsy v1.2.3 (5) with default parameters, and a maximum likelihood tree was built from this alignment using RaxML v8 (6) under the GTR+GAMMA model with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The core genome phylogenetic tree and strains used for dDDH and ANI have been deposited in publicly available databases.

TABLE 1.

Demographic and genomic features of the isolates

Isolate Source State Genome
size (bp)
G+C
content (%)
No. of
contigs
N50 (bp) GenBank
accession no.
NCBI SRA
accession no.
2017V-1110 Wound CO 3,994,199 47.1 168 48,914 QKKU00000000 SRR7962202
2016V-1091 Stool NE 3,814,331 47.3 93 156,947 QKKQ00000000 SRR7962186
2017V-1176 Animal feed IA 3,896,770 47.2 110 134,986 QKKW00000000 SRR7962200
2016V-1114 Stool IL 3,873,695 47.3 92 150,142 QKKS00000000 SRR7962196
2016V-1111 Stool ND 3,883,261 47.3 92 118,713 QKKR00000000 SRR7962199
2017V-1105 Wound FL 4,080,989 47.2 90 167,992 QKKT00000000 SRR7962197
2014V-1107 Stool IA 3,988,159 47.4 116 114,877 QKKP00000000 SRR7962194
2017V-1144 Stool TX 3,869,006 47.2 131 124,156 QKKV00000000 SRR7962203
07-2425 NAa NA 3,826,909 47.4 103 112,361 QKKO00000000 SRR7962192
a

NA, not applicable.

Species delineation values for prokaryotes have been considered 95% or higher for ANI and 70% or higher for dDDH (7). The nine sequenced strains shared 96.5% to 99% ANI and 82% to 85% dDDH values. On the other hand, in comparisons with representative V. cholerae strains, ANI ranged from 94% to 96% and dDDH from 65% to 70%. Core genome phylogeny shows that these strains form a strongly supported monophyletic clade basal to V. cholerae. Taken together, the tree topology and ANI and dDDH values suggest that these nine isolates could belong to a new species representing the closest relative of V. cholerae known to date or a highly divergent lineage within the species.

All nine strains contain the toxin transcriptional regulator gene (toxR), which is the master regulator of virulence genes in V. cholerae, but lack major virulence factor and related genetic elements and/or genes typical of toxigenic V. cholerae, such as ctxAB, tcpA, and the two Vibrio pathogenicity islands VPI-1 and VPI-2. However, eight out of nine strains possessed RTX toxin (8), and two strains possessed genes for the type III secretion system, which is an established virulence factor for V. cholerae (9). The presence of these virulence-related genes, in addition to their isolation from clinical cases, underscores the pathogenic potential of this monophyletic group of strains.

Data availability.

The complete genome sequences were deposited in DDBJ/GenBank and raw reads were deposited in the SRA depository under the accession numbers listed in Table 1. Phylogenetic tree, ANI, and dDDH values were deposited in a publicly available repository under the DOI 10.7939/DVN/OZHLC2 (https://doi.org/10.7939/DVN/OZHLC2).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Integrated Microbial Biodiversity program of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (to Y.B.), and federal appropriations to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the Advanced Molecular Detection Initiative.

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Takemura AF, Chien DM, Polz MF. 2014. Associations and dynamics of Vibrionaceae in the environment, from the genus to the population level. Front Microbiol 5:38. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tarr CL, Patel JS, Puhr ND, Sowers EG, Bopp CA, Strockbine NA. 2007. Identification of Vibrio isolates by a multiplex PCR assay and rpoB sequence determination. J Clin Microbiol 45:134–140. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01544-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. 2016. JSpeciesWS: a Web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Angiuoli SV, Salzberg SL. 2011. Mugsy: fast multiple alignment of closely related whole genomes. Bioinformatics 27:334–342. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. 2009. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lin W, Fullner KJ, Clayton R, Sexton JA, Rogers MB, Calia KE, Calderwood SB, Fraser C, Mekalanos JJ. 1999. Identification of a Vibrio cholerae RTX toxin gene cluster that is tightly linked to the cholera toxin prophage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1071–1076. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.3.1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dziejman M, Serruto D, Tam VC, Sturtevant D, Diraphat P, Faruque SM, Rahman MH, Heidelberg JF, Decker J, Li L, Montgomery KT, Grills G, Kucherlapati R, Mekalanos J. 2005. Genomic characterization of non-O1, non-O139 Vibrio cholerae reveals genes for a type III secretion system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:3465–3470. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409918102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The complete genome sequences were deposited in DDBJ/GenBank and raw reads were deposited in the SRA depository under the accession numbers listed in Table 1. Phylogenetic tree, ANI, and dDDH values were deposited in a publicly available repository under the DOI 10.7939/DVN/OZHLC2 (https://doi.org/10.7939/DVN/OZHLC2).


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES