Abstract
Objective:
It is controversial whether preprocedural elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) could increase the incidence of periprocedural myocardial infraction (PMI) of higher risk stratifications. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative elevated CRP level was related to the incidence of PMI in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:
A total of 4.426 patients [66 y (59, 75); 72.3% males] with normal preprocedural cardiac enzymes were prospectively divided into two groups; the elevated CRP group was defined as CRP >3 mg/L, which was approximately 30.4% of the patients. The relationship between CRP and the incidence of PMI was established by multivariate logistic regression analysis, and multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between CRP and the severity of myocardial injury.
Results:
The incidence rates were similar between the two groups with periprocedural myocardial minor necrosis (34.23% versus 32.74%, p=0.607), but significantly differed based on the 2007 (defined as cardiac enzymes >3-fold elevations), 31.25% in high CRP group versus 26.25% in low group [odds ratio (OR) 1.19; p=0.046] and the 2012 universal PMI (defined as cardiac enzymes >5-fold elevations with at least one clinical evidence, such as chest pain, ECG changes or imaging diagnosis of heart ischemia), 19.79% versus 15.35% (OR 1.26, p=0.023); besides, the PMI ratios increased in line with the elevation of CRP (p=0.006 for the 2007 and p=0.011 for the 2012 universal PMI). However, no significant linear relationship was found between CRP and high sensitivity cardiac troponin I peak post-PCI.
Conclusion:
Elevated baseline CRP was an independent risk factor for the incidence of the 2007 and the 2012 universal PMI rather than minor necrosis. However, CRP may not correlate with the severity of minor myocardial necrosis in patients with PMI.
Keywords: C-reactive protein, percutaneous coronary intervention, complications, prediction, periprocedural myocardial infraction
Introduction
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the most predominant treatment for coronary revascularization. Although technical advances in PCI result in a safe procedure with minimal complications, a considerable part of patients undergoing elective PCI suffer periprocedural myocardial infraction (PMI) arising from the procedure itself (1, 2). Besides, several definitions have been established over the last 10 years (3-5), mainly including periprocedural myocardial minor necrosis (PMN, defined as 1-3 fold elevations of cardiac enzymes post-PCI), the 2007 universal PMI (simply defined as cardiac enzymes >3-fold elevations), the 2012 universal PMI (cardiac enzymes >5-fold elevations with at least one clinical evidence, such as chest pain, ECG changes or imaging diagnosis of heart ischemia) and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) new PMI definition (defined as creatine kinase-myocardial band isoform (CK-MB) >10-fold elevations or cardiac troponin (cTn) >70-fold elevations with new pathologic Q-waves in 2 contiguous leads or new persistent left bundle branch block).
It has been well established that PMI is associated with a higher risk of mortality and adverse cardiac events, even with minor necrosis. There is a dose-response relationship between cardiac enzymes release (1-3-fold, >3-fold, >5-fold) and the ratio of subsequent events according to previous studies (6-9). Idris et al. (10) indicated that the rates of death/myocardial infraction at 2 years in patients based on the SCAI definition were higher than that based on the 2012 and the 2007 universal PMI. Therefore, it was important to routinely screen for PMI, particularly for the patients belonging to higher risk stratifications.
As an acute-phase reactant and the most widely used marker of systemic inflammation, C-reactive protein (CRP) plays an important role in the procedure of thrombogenesis and thromboembolism (11), which associates with the incidence of PMI (9, 12). Some studies have demonstrated that increased baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) before PCI may influence subsequent clinical outcomes (13-15). However, the role of CRP and post-PCI myocardial injury is still debatable, with previous studies presenting conflicting results (16-22).
On the basis of significantly different risk stratifications of PMI as mentioned above, the distinction of PMI of higher stratifications is equally important. However, no comprehensive study about the association of CRP with subsequent PMI of different risk classifications has been performed. Thus, we aimed to reveal the possible role of CRP in PMI of varying standards and tried to explore the potential mechanism in this procedure.
Methods
Study population and design
Our investigation was designed as a retrospective cohort study. A total of 7,096 consecutive patients of coronary stenosis with angiographic testified who underwent PCIs with drug-eluting stents at our hospital from May 2014 to April 2017 were considered. About 2,670 patients were excluded according to the criteria presented in Figure 1, and finally 4,426 patients were included. Interventions were performed according to the current practice guidelines. The choices of specific types of drug-stents were made according to the discretion of operators and consent of patients. All patients undergoing PCI were prescribed 100 mg/day aspirin and 75 mg/day clopidogrel maintenance therapy for more than 7 days; a 300 mg loading dose of aspirin or clopidogrel before the index procedure was administered if patients were not pretreated. And 10 mg/day rosuvastatin or 20 mg/day atorvastatin was conventionally given before the procedure. All the procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Each patient signed the informed consent form to participate in the study.
Figure 1.
Research process
CAG- coronary angiography; CK-MB- the MB fraction of creatine kinase; cTnI- cardiac troponin I; CRP- C-reactive protein; PMI- periprocedural myocardial infraction; PMN- periprocedural myocardial minor necrosis; STEMI- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Data collection
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of baseline CRP, cTnI, CK-MB and other serum biochemical indices in the last 24 h before the procedure. All interventions were performed using standard techniques. The cTnI and CK-MB levels were evaluated every 8 h within 24 h after PCI, and a 24–48 h dynamic monitoring after the procedure was used if necessary. All the factors implicated for higher incidence of PMI according to previous studies were also collected before the end of the procedure (23, 24).
End points and definitions
The primary end point was to investigate the role of CRP in subsequent PMI of various standards mentioned above. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate whether it can influence the severity of myocardial injury.
Based on the cut-off point suggested in the previous studies (13, 25, 26), CRP >3 mg/L was considered as elevated. As a more hyper-sensitive cardiac enzymes, elevated cTnI peak (indexed by upper reference limit), was used to assess the severity of myocardial injury post-PCI.
Statistical methods
Categorical variables were expressed as percentages (%) and continuous variables were presented as medians with interquartile ranges; the normality test of the continuous variables was routinely conducted by standard normal curve testing with the Kurtosis and Skewness coefficients. The statistical method multiple imputation was used to deal with the random missing data for some covariates. Continuous variables were compared by using Mann-Whitney U test, and noncontinuous were determined using χ2 statistical test. The predictive value of CRP for PMI was investigated with the use of multiple logistic regression analysis. Elevated cTnI peak post-PCI was identified in each group of various PMI standards, and its relationship with the continuous variable of CRP was evaluated by using multiple linear regression analysis. In these models, odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were confirmed by Schoenfeld tests, and no relevant violations were found. All calculations were performed using SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, the United States), and 2-sided p values <0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Patient baseline data and PMI ratios
All the clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics were recorded as shown in Tables 1-3. Elevated CRP (>3.0 mg/L) was observed in 30.4% of the study population. Of the included patients, 72.3% were males, 69.7% had hypertension, 27.6% had diabetes, 43.3% had acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 54.2% had the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) class B2 or C lesions, and 47.6% had multi-stents interventions.
Table 1.
Main clinical features according to CRP levels
| Variables | Low CRP level (CRP ≤3 mg/L) (n=3082) | High CRP level (CRP >3 mg/L) (n=1344) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 66 (59, 73) | 68 (60, 76) | <0.001 |
| Serum LDL-C, mmol/L | 1.82 (1.42, 2.44) | 2.05 (1.56, 2.69) | <0.001 |
| Cardiac insufficiency, % (n) | 5.4% (133/2462) | 15.7% (175/1116) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension, % (n) | 68.5% (2079/3036) | 72.4% (957/1321) | 0.009 |
| Renal insufficiency, % (n) | 3.3% (100/3016) | 8.8% (115/1304) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes, % (n) | 26.3% (798/3032) | 30.7% (404/1318) | 0.003 |
| Previous PCI, % (n) | 34.9% (1055/3025) | 26.4% (348/1317) | <0.001 |
| Previous AMI, % (n) | 8.8% (266/3082) | 6.4% (84/1316) | 0.007 |
| Previous CABG, % (n) | 0.7% (21/3025) | 1.3% (17/1318) | 0.053 |
| ACS, % (n) | 41.7% (1257/3014) | 46.9% (610/1301) | 0.002 |
Data are expressed as number (%)/number or with interquartile range.
ACS- acute coronary syndrome; AMI- acute myocardial infraction; CABG- coronary artery bypass surgery; CRP- C-reactive protein; LDL-C- low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PCI- percutaneous coronary intervention
Table 2.
CAG characteristics according to CRP
| Variables | Low CRP level (CRP ≤3 g/L) (n=3082) | High CRP level (CRP >3 g/L) (n=1344) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lesion location: LM, % (n) | 8.7% (263/3013) | 7.5% (99/1322) | 0.174 |
| LAD,% (n) | 57% (1717/3013) | 53.5% (707/1322 | 0.032 |
| LCX,% (n) | 24% (724/3013) | 21.8% (288/1322) | 0.108 |
| RCA,% (n) | 28.6%(861/3013) | 33.1% (438/1322) | 0.003 |
| Multivessel lesions, % (n) | 15.8% (476/3013) | 14.2% (188/1322) | 0.159 |
| Lesion Characteristics: | |||
| Bifurcation lesion, % (n) | 11.3% (341/3013) | 10.5% (139/1322) | 0.438 |
| Lesion length ≥20 mm, % (n) | 61.4% (1849/3013) | 64.2% (849/1322) | 0.074 |
| Calcification, % (n) | 18.0% (543/3013) | 22.3% (295/1322) | 0.001 |
| Eccentricity, % (n) | 59.2% (1784/3013) | 61.2% (809/1322) | 0.220 |
| Tortuosity, % (n) | 5.2% (158/3013) | 5.6% (74/1322) | 0.634 |
| Diameter ≥25 mm, % (n) | 80.3% (2420/3013) | 81.8% (1081/1322) | 0.264 |
| Chronic total occlusion, % (n) | 7.3% (221/3013) | 9.4% (124/1322) | 0.022 |
| Type B2/C lesion, % (n) | 53.8% (1620/3013) | 55.1% (728/1322) | 0.429 |
Data are expressed as number/number (%).
CAG- coronary angiography; CRP- C-reactive protein; LAD- left anterior descending; LCX- left circumflex; LM- left main artery; RCA- right coronary artery; Type B2/C- type C lesion or more than 2 characteristics of type B lesions
Table 3.
PCI procedures according to CRP
| Variables | Low CRP level (CRP ≤3 g/L) (n=3082) | High CRP level (CRP >3 g/L) (n=1344) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balloon pre-dilation, % (n) | 80.9% (2437/3013) | 82.1% (1086/1322) | 0.326 |
| Direct PCI, % (n) | 16.2% (487/3013) | 14.9% (197/1322) | 0.294 |
| Atherectomy,%(n) | 1.2% (37/3013) | 0.8% (11/1322) | 0.251 |
| Post ballooning, % (n) | 88.9% (2680/3013) | 89.9% (1188/1322) | 0.371 |
| Stent average length, mm | 24 (20, 30) | 25 (20, 30) | 0.150 |
| Stent number ≥2, % (n) | 47.3% (1396/2953) | 48.2% (623/1292) | 0.534 |
| TIMI grade <3 after PCI, % (n) | 1.2% (37/3013) | 1.1% (15/1322) | 0.795 |
Data are expressed as number/number (%) or with interquartile range.
CRP- C-reactive protein; PCI- percutaneous coronary intervention; TIMI- thrombolysis in myocardial infarction
About 2,727 patients (61.61%) had cardiac enzymes elevations [1,867 (60.58%) for low CRP group and 860 (63.99%) for the high group]. The ratios of various types of periprocedural myocardial injury are shown in Figure 2. The incidence of PMI was elevated in hyper baseline CRP level for the 2007 (1.2 fold) and the 2012 universal PMI (1.32 fold) rather than PMN (0.96 fold). As for the 2013 SCAI definition, the incidence in each group was much lower (only 0.74% versus 0.29%) although it was much higher in high CRP.
Figure 2.
Incidence of PMI according to varying definitions
CRP- C-reactive protein; PMI- periprocedural myocardial infraction; PMN- periprocedural myocardial minor necrosis; SCAI- the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions
Association between CRP and the ratio of PMI
Based on the 2007 universal definition (Fig. 3), high baseline CRP (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.008-1.414; p=0.04) was an independent predictor of PMI. Applying the 2012 third universal PMI definition and using the same model, high baseline CRP played a more important predictive role (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.032-1.545; p=0.023) (Fig. 4). As for the 2013 SCAI standard (Fig. 5), the OR of 2.903 maybe a little debatable (95% CI, 0.799-10.547; p=0.106). However, it showed no statistical significance (OR, 0.095; 95% CI, 0.815-1.127; p=0.607) with the same model for PMN (Fig. 6). Therefore, elevated CRP might be helpful for the prediction for the 2007 and 2012 universal PMI, but not for PMN.
Figure 3.
OR for the 2007 PMI
*indicate P<0.05
ACS- acute coronary syndrome; CRP- C-reactive protein; LDL-C- low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; OR- odds ratio; PMI- periprocedural myocardial infraction; Type B2/C- type C lesion or more than 2 characteristics of type B lesions
Figure 4.
OR for the 2012 PMI
*indicate P<0.05
ACS- acute coronary syndrome; CRP- C-reactive protein; LDL-C- low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; OR- odds ratio; PMI- periprocedural myocardial infraction; Type B2/C- type C lesion or more than 2 characteristics of type B lesions
Figure 5.
OR for SCAI
ACS- acute coronary syndrome; CRP- C-reactive protein; LDL-C- low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; OR- odds ratio; PMI- periprocedural myocardial infraction; SCAI- the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Type B2/C- type C lesion or more than 2 characteristics of type B lesions
Figure 6.
OR for PMN
ACS- acute coronary syndrome; CRP- C-reactive protein; LDL-C- low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; OR- odds ratio; PMN- periprocedural myocardial minor necrosis; Type B2/C- type C lesion or more than 2 characteristics of type B lesions
On this basis, we tried to evaluate whether higher CRP levels associated with more frequencies of PMI using multiple logistic regression analysis (Table 4): the occurrence rates of PMI elevated as the level hyper baseline CRP (beta=0.010, p=0.006 for the 2007 and beta=0.009, p=0.011 for the 2012 universal PMI). All the other covariates listed were associated with PMI expect for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and diabetes.
Table 4.
The multiple logistic regression analysis adjusting for continuous variable of baseline CRP level for the incidence of PMI
| Variables | The 2007 PMI | The 2012 PMI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | 95% CI | Beta | 95% CI | |
| Renal insufficiency, 5% | 0.388 | 1.048-2.075 | 0.228 | 0.855-1.844 |
| Cardiac insufficiency, 8.6% | 0.492 | 1.233-2.171 | 0.612 | 1.348-2.520 |
| Hypertension, 69.7% | 0.182 | 1.003-1.436 | 0.290 | 1.071-1.668 |
| Diabetes, 27.6% | -0.040 | 0.803-1.15 | 0.035 | 0.808-1.281 |
| Type B2/C, 54.2% | 0.401 | 1.273-1.753 | 0.393 | 1.220-1.799 |
| Age ≥65 y, 57.9% | 0.370 | 1.221-1.715 | 0.320 | 1.121-1.693 |
| LDL-C, mmol/L | 0.007 | 0.923-1.10 | 0.032 | 0.931-1.145 |
| Multi-vessel PCI, 47.6% | 0.591 | 1.538-2.121 | 0.509 | 1.391-1.989 |
| ACS, 43.3% | 0.211 | 1.055-1.447 | 0.191 | 1.003-1.463 |
| CRP, mg/L | 0.010 | 1.003-1.017 | 0.009 | 1.002-1.017 |
Data are expressed as number/number (%) or with interquartile range.
ACS- acute coronary syndrome; CRP- C-reactive protein; LDL-C- low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PMI- periprocedural myocardial infraction; Type B2/C- type C lesion or more than 2 characteristics of type B lesions
Association between CRP and the severity of PMI
To study the mechanism of how CRP increases the incidence of PMI, we analyzed the relationship between the baseline CRP level and the severity of myocardial injury evaluated by the cTnI peak using multiple linear regression analysis in patients with the 2007 and 2012 universal PMI (Table 5). No significant linear relationship between CRP and cTnI peak was found. However, LDL-C and diabetes were related to the cTnI peak, which had no significant predictive value to the incidence ratio of PMI as shown previously.
Table 5.
The linear relationship between elevated CRP levels and cTnI peaks post-PCI for the 2007 and the 2012 universal PMI
| Variables | The 2007 PMI | The 2012 PMI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P value | Beta | P value | Beta | |
| Renal insufficiency | 0.205 | 0.049 | 0.560 | 0.029 |
| Cardiac insufficiency | 0.035 | 0.081 | 0.124 | 0.074 |
| Hypertension | 0.341 | 0.032 | 0.523 | 0.028 |
| Diabetes | 0.033 | 0.072 | 0.042 | 0.089 |
| Type B/2C | 0.616 | -0.016 | 0.572 | -0.024 |
| Age ≥65 y | 0.986 | 0.001 | 0.627 | -0.022 |
| LDL-C | <0.001 | 0.123 | <0.001 | 0.155 |
| Multi-vessel PCI | 0.766 | -0.10 | 0.841 | -0.009 |
| ACS | 0028 | 0.073 | 0.046 | 0.086 |
| CRP | 0.989 | <0.001 | 0.963 | -0.002 |
Data are expressed as number/number (%) or with interquartile range.
ACS- acute coronary syndrome; CRP- C-reactive protein; cTnI- cardiac troponin I; LDL-C- low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PCI- percutaneous coronary intervention; PMI- periprocedural myocardial infraction; Type B2/C- type C lesion or more than 2 characteristics of type B lesions
Discussion
It is increasingly important to distinguish PMI of higher stratifications with the recognition of its poor prognosis. Previous studies have demonstrated the dose-response relationship between cardiac enzymes release (1-3 fold, >3-folds, >5-folds) and the ratio of subsequent events using any cardiac enzyme, including CK-MB, cTn I and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) (6-8). According to Idris et al. (10), the rates of death/myocardial infraction at 2 y in patients with PMI were 14.7%, 16.9% and 29.4% respectively, based on the 2007, the 2012 and the 2013 definition, which were much higher than those patients without PMI. Thus, more frequent late death/myocardial infraction occurrences are associated with the 2013 SCAI definition; relative more occur with the 2012 and 2007 universal PMI, whereas, much lesser are associated with PMN. Thus, the prediction for PMI of higher risk stratifications is much more important than that for slight enzyme elevations.
However, previous studies examining the relationship between preprocedural CRP level and periprocedural myocardial injury (mainly minor PMN and the 2007 universal PMI) reported controversial conclusions, with different cardiac enzymes, various cut-offs of CRP, and relatively smaller samples (16-18, 20, 22, 27, 28). For instance, the results from the study done by Goldberg et al. (22) which used >4.6 mg/L as a CRP cutoff was contradictory to that from other previous large sample size studies which used >3 mg/L as a CRP cutoff in patients with stable angina (13, 25, 26). However, altogether 208 patients were included in the study done by Goldberg et al. (22), thus, the relatively smaller sample size may influence the authenticity of their study. Similar studies aiming at the relation between CRP and troponin elevations reached opposite conclusions (16, 17, 20, 28).
In our large cohort of 4426 patients with drug-stent implantation, we made a comprehensive study about the predictive value of elevated CRP to the subsequent PMI based on significant different risk classifications. Our data suggested that elevated CRP level was associated with a significant incremental risk for the 2007 and the 2012 universal PMI, but not for PMN. This finding is important because PMI of the 2007 and the 2012 universal standards are associated with more incidences of adverse events than PMN during follow-up (6, 7). Although the predictive value with SCAI definition (OR, 2.9, p=0.11) was not cogent enough, the limited data of our study indicated that the incidence was much higher in high CRP group (2.55-fold).
For the post-PCI myocardial enzymes elevation, in contrast with previous findings (20, 22), the incidence rates in our study were similar between the low CRP group and the high CRP group. The smaller sample size might account for controversial results of those previous studies for the predictive value of CRP to myocardial injury based on simple cardiac enzymes elevation.
In our findings, no significant predictive value was found between elevated CRP and PMN or for all the other patient characters, or the lesion-related factors. The results above may imply that PMN was more related to intervention procedure, and further studies about the predictive value of other related procedural factors on the minor cardiac enzymes release are necessary.
However, the limited data of PMI based on the 2013 SCAI definition showing a more important predictive role (OR, 2.9; p=0.11) of CRP, was not convincing enough for the lower incidence of this standard (0.29% in low CRP group and 0.74% in high group) caused by the strict criterion. On comparing with a previous study (2.6% in the study of Idris et al. (10), but only 1.47% with normal pre-PCI cTn), another reason for the lower incidence was probably that we excluded patients with elevated baseline cardiac enzymes ahead of schedule. Further, larger sample and comprehensive studies needed to be performed to definitively confirm the correlation with SACI standard PMI.
To further investigate whether a dose-response relation between CRP and PMI existed, we incorporated the continuous variable of CRP into the multiple regression analysis model de novo. We found the PMI ratios increased with the level of CRP, which could explain why PMI incidences were much higher in the studies using higher CRP cut-offs (16, 17, 22).
By contrast, no linear relation between the continuous variable of CRP and cTnI peaks was found; however, the most interesting result of our study was that LDL-C and diabetes related to the release of myocardial enzymes, regardless of little independent predictive value for PMI of the 2007 and the 2012 universal standards. Thus, LDL-C and diabetes may not predict a higher incidence of PMI independently, but could associate with the severity of myocardial injury.
On the basis of our findings, CRP may help predict the incidence rate of PMI before PCI procedures, and which is indicated that the prevention of PMI by correcting basal hyper inflammation may translate into an improvement in prognosis during follow-up. The view is supported by reinforcing anti-inflammatory drug therapy, i.e., statins (29, 30), the interleukin-6 receptor antagonist (31), vitamin C (32), and interventional nicorandil pharmacology (33) to reduce PMI for selective patients with PCI. We believe more drugs with anti-inflammatory properties will be put into practice to reduce PMI in the near future.
Study limitations
First, as a single-center, retrospective cohort study, some unknown confounding factors may have affected the outcomes, regardless of in-order patient recruitment and analytical adjustments. Second, although some variables showing p<0.05 in the univariate analyses were excluded in multivariate analyses for clinical considerations; it is possible that these parameters affect the occurrence of cardiac events. Third, in some patients, transient hs-CRP may be affected by the underlying disease or undetected infection independently. Next, we failed to ascertain the predictive role in the 2013 SCAI standard PMI because of the relatively smaller number of events due to the strict criterion and the exclusion of preprocedural elevated cardiac enzymes. Finally, we did not collect the detailed information about other medications except for antiplatelet drugs and statins on admission and more procedural risk factors that may influence the incidence of PMI.
Conclusion
Elevated baseline CRP level is an independent risk factor for the 2007 and 2012 standard PMI rather than PMN, and the risk increased in accordance with the level of preprocedural elevated hs-CRP. However, CRP may not correlate with the severity of myocardial injury in patients with PMI.
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to the staff of the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital who took part in the creation of our registry; their time spent on data collection was essential for the realization of the present study.
Footnotes
Funding: This study was funded by grants from the Nature Science Foundation of Zhejiang province (No: LY18H020001).
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Authorship contributions: Concept – M.Y., W.Z., J.Z.; Design – M.Y., W.Z., J.Z.; Supervision – L.Z., L.W., Y.L.; Fundings – L.Z., L.W., G.F., J.Z.; Materials – L.Z., L.W., G.F., J.Z.; Data collection &/or processing – M.Y., W.Z., J.S.; Analysis &/or interpretation – M.Y., W.Z., Y. L., J.S.; Literature search – M.Y., G.F., J.Z.; Writing – M.Y., Y. L., J.S.; Critical review – W.Z., G.F., J.Z.
References
- 1.Byrne R A, Stefanini GG, Capodanno D, Onuma Y, Baumbach A, Escaned J, et al. Report of an ESC-EAPCI Task Force on the evaluation and use of bioresorbable scaffolds for percutaneous coronary intervention: executive summary. Eur Heart J. 2017;39:1591–601. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e146–e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moussa ID, Klein LW, Shah B, Mehran R, Mack MJ, Brilakis ES, et al. Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1563–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD. Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2173–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, et al. Writing Group on the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2551–67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cavallini C, Verdecchia P, Savonitto S, Arraiz G, Violini R, Olivari Z, et al. Italian Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology and Society for Invasive Cardiology–GISE Investigators. Prognostic value of isolated troponin I elevation after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:431–5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.957712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jang JS, Jin HY, Seo JS, Yang TH, Kim DK, Kim DS, et al. Prognostic value of creatine kinase-myocardial band isoenzyme elevation following percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81:959–67. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Prasad A, Singh M, Lerman A, Lennon RJ, Holmes DJ, Rihal CS. Isolated elevation in troponin T after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with higher long-term mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1765–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Park DW, Kim YH, Yun SC, Ahn JM, Lee JY, Kim WJ, et al. Frequency, causes, predictors, and clinical significance of peri-procedural myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:1662–9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Idris H, Lo S, Shugman IM, Saad Y, Hopkins AP, Mussap C, et al. Varying definitions for periprocedural myocardial infarction alter event rates and prognostic implications. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e001086. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bisoendial RJ, Kastelein JJ, Levels JH, Zwaginga JJ, van den Bogaard B, Reitsma PH, et al. Activation of inflammation and coagulation after infusion of C-reactive protein in humans. Circ Res. 2005;96:714–6. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000163015.67711.AB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Park DW, Kim YH, Yun SC, Ahn JM, Lee JY, Kim WJ, et al. Impact of the angiographic mechanisms underlying periprocedural myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:1105–10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Park DW, Yun SC, Lee JY, Kim WJ, Kang SJ, Lee SW, et al. C-reactive protein and the risk of stent thrombosis and cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation. Circulation. 2009;120:1987–95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Park DW, Lee SW, Yun SC, Song HG, Ahn JM, Lee JY, et al. A point-of-care platelet function assay and C-reactive protein for prediction of major cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2630–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wada H, Dohi T, Miyauchi K, Doi S, Naito R, Konishi H, et al. Independent and Combined Effects of Serum Albumin and C-Reactive Protein on Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ J. 2017;81:1293–1300. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Saadeddin SM, Habbab MA, Sobki SH, Ferns GA. Association of systemic inflammatory state with troponin I elevation after elective uncomplicated percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:981–3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02253-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zairis MN, Ambrose JA, Ampartzidou O, Lyras AG, Manousakis SJ, Makrygiannis SS, et al. GENERATION Study Group. Preprocedural plasma C-reactive protein levels, postprocedural creatine kinase-MB release, and long-term prognosis after successful coronary stenting (four-year results from the GENERATION study) Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:386–90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.09.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Saleh N, Svane B, Velander M, Nilsson T, Hansson L O, Tornvall P. C-reactive protein and myocardial infarction during percutaneous coronary intervention. J Intern Med. 2004;255:33–9. doi: 10.1046/j.0954-6820.2003.01255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gach O, Legrand V, Biessaux Y, Chapelle JP, Vanbelle S, Pierard LA. Long-term prognostic significance of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein before and after coronary angioplasty in patients with stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:31–5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hubacek J, Basran RS, Shrive FM, Shewchuk L, Goodhart DM, Anderson TJ. Foothills Interventional Cardiology Service Research Group. Prognostic implications of C-reactive protein and troponin following percutaneous coronary intervention. Can J Cardiol. 2009;25:e42–7. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70483-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Niccoli G, Sgueglia GA, Latib A, Crea F, Colombo A. CACTUS Study Group. Association of baseline C-reactive protein levels with periprocedural myocardial injury in patients undergoing percutaneous bifurcation intervention: a CACTUS study subanalysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:E37–44. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Goldberg A, Gruberg L, Roguin A, Petcherski S, Rimer D, Markiewicz W, et al. Preprocedural C-reactive protein levels predict myocardial necrosis after successful coronary stenting in patients with stable angina. Am Heart J. 2006;151:1265–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Babu GG, Walker JM, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Peri-procedural myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention: an important target for cardioprotection. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:23–31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee SW, Lee PH, Kang SH, Choi H, Chang M, Roh JH, et al. Determinants and Prognostic Significance of Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Patients With Successful Percutaneous Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:2220–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Park DW, Lee CW, Yun SC, Kim YH, Hong MK, Kim JJ, et al. Prognostic impact of preprocedural C reactive protein levels on 6-month angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation. Heart. 2007;93:1087–92. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.099762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chew DP, Bhatt DL, Robbins MA, Penn MS, Schneider JP, Lauer MS, et al. Incremental prognostic value of elevated baseline C-reactive protein among established markers of risk in percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2001;104:992–7. doi: 10.1161/hc3401.095074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Patti G, Mangiacapra F, Ricottini E, Cannatà A, Cavallari I, Vizzi V, et al. Correlation of platelet reactivity and C-reactive protein levels to occurrence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the ARMYDA-CRP study) J Am Cardiol. 2013;111:1739–44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gach O, Louis O, Chapelle JP, Vanbelle S, Pierard LA, Legrand V. Baseline inflammation is not predictive of periprocedural troponin elevation after elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Vessels. 2009;24:267–70. doi: 10.1007/s00380-008-1120-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Patti G, Cannon C P, Murphy S A, Mega S, Pasceri V, Briguori C, et al. Clinical benefit of statin pretreatment in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a collaborative patient-level meta-analysis of 13 randomized studies. Circulation. 2011;123:1622–32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.002451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhai C, Cong H, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Liu X, Zhang H, et al. Effect of High-Dose Statin Pretreatment on the Incidence of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Grading the Evidence Through a Cumulative Meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol. 2015;38:668–78. doi: 10.1002/clc.22471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kleveland O, Kunszt G, Bratlie M, Ueland T, Broch K, Holte E, et al. Effect of a single dose of the interleukin-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab on inflammation and troponin T release in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2406–13. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang ZJ, Hu WK, Liu YY, Shi DM, Cheng WJ, Guo YH, et al. The effect of intravenous vitamin C infusion on periprocedural myocardial injury for patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hwang J, Lee HC, Kim BW, Yang MJ, Park JS, Park JH, et al. Effect on periprocedural myocardial infarction of intra-coronary nicorandil prior to percutaneous coronary intervention in stable and unstable angina. J Cardiol. 2013;62:77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]