Abstract
Clostridioides difficile is the main cause for nosocomial antibiotic associated diarrhea and has become a major burden for the health care systems of industrial countries. Its main virulence factors, the small GTPase glycosylating toxins TcdA and TcdB, are extensively studied. In contrast, the contribution of other factors to development and progression of C. difficile infection (CDI) are only insufficiently understood. Many bacterial peptidyl-prolyl-cis/trans-isomerases (PPIases) have been described in the context of virulence. Among them are the parvulin-type PrsA-like PPIases of Gram-positive bacteria. On this basis, we identified CD630_35000 as the PrsA2 homolog in C. difficile and conducted its enzymatic and phenotypic characterization in order to assess its involvement during C. difficile infection. For this purpose, wild type CdPrsA2 and mutant variants carrying amino acid exchanges mainly in the PPIase domain were recombinantly produced. Recombinant CdPrsA2 showed PPIase activity toward the substrate peptide Ala-Xaa-Pro-Phe with a preference for positively charged amino acids preceding the proline residue. Mutation of conserved residues in its active site pocket impaired the enzymatic activity. A PrsA2 deficient mutant was generated in the C. difficile 630Δerm background using the ClosTron technology. Inactivation of prsA2 resulted in a reduced germination rate in response to taurocholic acid, and in a slight increase in resistance to the secondary bile acids LCA and DCA. Interestingly, in the absence of PrsA2 colonization of mice by C. difficile 630 was significantly reduced. We concluded that CdPrsA2 is an active PPIase that acts as a virulence modulator by influencing crucial processes like sporulation, germination and bile acid resistance resulting in attenuated mice colonization.
Keywords: Clostridioides difficile, PrsA2, peptidyl-prolyl-cis/trans-isomerase, resistance, germination, colonization
Introduction
The Gram-positive obligate anaerobe Clostridioides difficile was first isolated in 1935 from neonates and identified as part of their natural intestinal microbiota. In 1978 it was recognized as the causative agent of enterocolitis and pseudomembraneous colitis following the introduction of clindamycin, a broad-band lincosamin antibiotic against Gram-negative anaerobes (Bartlett et al., 1977; Lusk et al., 1978). In industrialized countries, C. difficile infection (CDI) has become a major burden in health care facilities in the last two decades with increasing incidence numbers in community-associated cases (Rupnik et al., 2009; Hopkins and Wilson, 2018). The most common severe form of CDI is pseudomembranous colitis which is a strong inflammation that goes along with fever, massive tissue destruction of the large intestine and leucocytosis (Barbut et al., 2007; Rupnik et al., 2009).
Clostridioides difficile infection is mainly mediated by two enterotoxins (TcdA and TcdB) that are essential for developing the disease (Burke and Lamont, 2014). These toxins are taken up by endocytosis, translocate into the host cell cytosol and exert their activity by glycosylating and thereby inactivating small GTPases in human enterocytes. This leads to the collapse of the actin cytoskeleton dynamics resulting in the distortion of the gut epithelial barrier and inflammation (Rupnik et al., 2009; Chandrasekaran and Lacy, 2017). Apart from its enterotoxins, several other virulence factors that contribute to disease severity and host colonization have been described for C. difficile and analyzed to different extents. These include, among others, the binary toxin CDT (C. difficile toxin) that is present in 5–6% of historic human isolates, extracellular proteases, surface layer proteins, several adhesins like a fibronectin binding protein (Fbp68) or a collagen binding protein (CbpA), flagella and type IV pili (Geric et al., 2004; Janoir, 2016; Ünal and Steinert, 2016; Péchiné et al., 2018). Furthermore, the bile acid status of the infected host was shown to clearly determine the course and outcome of CDI as patients display a clear shift from antibacterial to less antibacterial bile acids due to the disturbances of their indigenous microbiome (Theriot et al., 2016). Besides this, the arsenal of virulence factors and mechanisms that contribute to host colonization, disease outbreak and dissemination is still largely unexplored.
Peptidyl-prolyl-cis/trans-isomerases (PPIases) are ubiquitous proteins that can be divided into three major classes: the FK-506 binding proteins (FKBPs), cyclophilins and parvulins (Schiene-Fischer et al., 2013; Dunyak and Gestwicki, 2016). Despite their amino acid sequence and structural differences all classes have in common that they catalyze the rate limiting isomerization of peptidyl-prolyl bonds during protein folding (Fischer et al., 1984; Fischer and Bang, 1985; Siekierka et al., 1989; Rahfeld et al., 1994). By this, they contribute to protein stability, activity and translocation in bacteria (Behrens-Kneip, 2010; Lyu and Zhao, 2015). Physiologically, PPIases participate in stress tolerance, protein homeostasis or secretion. In many instances PPIases have been shown to contribute to virulence in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (Ünal and Steinert, 2014). The most prominent examples are the macrophage infectivity potentiator (Mip) of Legionella pneumophila, and PrsA2 of Listeria monocytogenes (Cahoon and Freitag, 2014; Rasch et al., 2014).
PrsA2 of L. monocytogenes (LmPrsA2) is a parvulin-type PPIase that is a lipoprotein and localizes to the cytoplasmic membrane. Like its homolog PrsA from Bacillus subtilis, it facilitates folding and efficient secretion of extracellular proteins (Kontinen et al., 1991; Vitikainen et al., 2004; Cahoon and Freitag, 2014). LmPrsA2 was first identified in a transposon mutant study as a factor promoting the virulence related trait haemolysis (Zemansky et al., 2009). Subsequently, it was shown to promote the activity or efficient secretion of several other virulence factors like the metalloprotease Mlp, the phospholipase PC-LPC, listeriolysin O or the actin-binding and nucleating protein ActA. Thus, it was influencing the outcome of infection in cellular and animal models (Alonzo and Freitag, 2010; Alonzo et al., 2011; Forster et al., 2011). Furthermore, LmPrsA2 homologs have been described in other major Gram-positive pathogens like Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus equi or S. suis in the context of virulence (Ikolo et al., 2015; Cincarova et al., 2016; Jiang et al., 2016; Wiemels et al., 2017). Accordingly, in this study we analyzed the closest homolog of LmPrsA2 in C. difficile, CD630_35000, in respect to its biochemistry as well as contribution to physiology and infection.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Culture
Bacterial strains and plasmids that were used in this study are listed in Table 1. C. difficile 630Δerm and its derivatives were cultured in BHIS medium (brain-heart infusion broth (Carl Roth GmbH) supplemented with 5 g/L yeast extract (BD BactoTM) and 1 g/L L-cysteine (Sigma-Aldrich) under anaerobic conditions (95% N2/5% H2). If necessary, 5 μg/mL erythromycin or 15 μg/mL thiamphenicol were added. Escherichia coli and Bacillus megaterium were cultured in LB medium supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin, 10 μg/mL tetracycline or 30 μg/ml chloramphenicol. All antibiotics were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Media were solidified by adding 1.5% (w/v) agar when needed.
Table 1.
Name | Features | Reference |
---|---|---|
C. difficile str. 630Δerm | Erythromycin-sensitive derivative of strain 630 | DSMZ† (DSM 28645), (Hussain et al., 2005) |
C. difficile str. 630ΔermΔprsA2 | cd35000::ClosTron | This study |
E. coli DH10β | Strain for cloning and plasmid propagation, F- mcrA Δ(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC) Φ80dlacZΔM15 ΔlacX74 endA1 recA1 deoR Δ(ara, leu)7697 araD139 galU galK nupG rpsL λ- | Grant et al., 1990 |
B. megaterium MS941 | Strain for recombinant production, deficient of the major secreted protease (ΔnrpM) | Wittchen and Meinhardt, 1995 |
pSPYocH-hp | Vector for recombinant production in B. megaterium, PxylA-(-35+ rbs+)-spyocH-mcs-his6, TcR, AmpR | Stammen et al., 2010 |
†German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures.
Recombinant Production of CdPrsA2 and Its Single Amino Acid Substitution Mutants
The prsA2 gene without the first 66 bp encoding for the N-terminal signal peptide was amplified with the primers 3500_For and 3500_Rev. The PCR product was cloned into the production vector pSPYocH-hp using the restriction sites EagI and SpeI yielding a C-terminally His-tagged protein that is N-terminally coupled to the signal peptide of YocH of B. subtilis (Stammen et al., 2010). Conserved amino acids, which were suspected to be involved in PPIase activity were substituted by alanine. This was done by inverse PCR utilizing the original production construct as template and primers with the respective codon changes. The linearized plasmids were gel purified, phosphorylated with T4 polynucleotide kinase (NEB) and re-ligated with T4 ligase (NEB) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmids carrying the desired mutations were selected in E. coli DH10β and verified by sequencing. After propagation and validation in E. coli DH10β, the protoplasts of the strain B. megaterium MS941 were transformed using purified plasmid DNA as described previously (Biedendieck et al., 2011). For recombinant production, an overnight culture of the production strain was prepared, and the next morning refreshed 1:100 in 300 ml LB medium containing 10 μg/mL tetracycline. The cells were induced at an OD600nm of ∼0.4 by the addition of sterile filtered D-xylose (Carl Roth GmbH) at a final concentration of 0.5 % (w/v). After 6 h the cells were removed (3000 g, 15 min, RT), and the supernatant was sterile filtered as pSPYocH-hp facilitates the secretion of the recombinantly produced protein into the culture supernatant. His-tagged PrsA2 and its variants were purified from the supernatant using Protino® Ni-TED columns (Macherey-Nagel) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein yield and purity were analyzed by SDS-page. Correct secondary structure folding of recombinant proteins was confirmed by circular dichroism. Primers used in this study are listed in Table 2.
Table 2.
Name | Sequence† | Features | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
PrsA2(wt)_For | TATactagtAGTAAAGGAGAAACTGTGGC | SpeI | This study |
PrsA2(wt)_Rev | TATcggccgAGATCCACGAGGTACTAAGATTGTGATTTTATTTAT | EagI, Thrombin site | This study |
PrsA2(K188A)_For | GCAACAGTAGATGATAATAACAAGCC | This study | |
PrsA2(K188A)_Rev | CAATAAAATATGAGAAGCTTCTAC | This study | |
PrsA2(D232A)_For | ATATTCACAAGCTACTTCAGCAAG | This study | |
PrsA2(D232A)_Rev | TTTTTTGCTACTTTTGCAAAATCCTC | This study | |
PrsA2(L241A)_For | GCAGGATTCTTTTCAAGGGGTCAA | This study | |
PrsA2(L241A)_Rev | TTTACCACCATCACTTGCTGA | This study | |
PrsA2(M249A)_For | GGTCAAGCGGTTGCTGAATTTG | This study | |
PrsA2(M249A)_Rev | CCTTGAAAAGAATCCTAATTTACC | This study | |
PrsA2(F253A)_For | GCAGAAGATGCTGCTTTTTCTATGAA | This study | |
PrsA2(F253A)_Rev | TTCAGCAACCATTTGACCCC | This study | |
PrsA2(T271A)_For | GCTCAATATGGATACCACATAATTAAAG | This study | |
PrsA2(T271A)_Rev | TTCAACTAAATCAGATACTTCACC | This study | |
PrsA2(Y273A)_For | GAAACTCAAGCTGGATACCACAT | This study | |
PrsA2(Y273A)_Rev | AACTAAATCAGATACTTCACCCTTT | This study | |
PrsA2(H276A)_For | TGGATACGCTATAATTAAAGTGACAG | This study | |
PrsA2(H276A)_Rev | TATTGAGTTTCAACTAAATCAGATAC | This study | |
EBS universal primer | CGAAATTAGAAACTTGCGTTCAGTAAAC | Heap et al., 2007 | |
ErmRAM_F | ACGCGTTATATTGATAAAAATAATAGTGGG | Heap et al., 2007 | |
ErmRAM_F | ACGCGTGCGACTCATAGAATTATTTCCTCCCG | Heap et al., 2007 | |
†Highlighted are the bases for the respective alanine exchange, restriction sites are kept in lowercase.
Protease-Free PPIase Assay
Protease-free PPIase assays were performed as previously described (Zoldák et al., 2009). Briefly, measurements of the PPIase activity were done in 35 mM HEPES pH 7.8 at 10°C in a HP8452 UV/Vis spectrophotometer using the substrate peptide Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNA. The time courses were followed at 330 nm after jumping from the peptide stock solution in 0.55 M LiCl/TFE into the final buffer solution. Data analysis was performed by single exponential non-linear regression. Measurements were performed at different concentrations of PrsA2 in triplicate. Determination of kcat/Km was performed by evaluation of the linear dependency of kenz from the concentration of PrsA2. Relative errors of the measurements were calculated using the standard errors of the linear regression. Substrate specificity was determined using substrate peptides of the form Abz-Ala-Xaa-Pro-Phe-pNA with Xaa representing different proteinogenic amino acids. Measurements were done in a Fluoromax 4 fluorescence spectrophotometer after jumping from the peptide stock solution in 0.55 M LiCl/TFE into the final buffer solution. The time courses were followed at 416 nm after excitation at 316 nm. Relative errors were calculated using the standard errors of the measurements in triplicate. Data were analyzed by ANOVA.
Construction of CD630_35000 (prsA2) Destruction Clones Using ClosTron
A synthetic vector containing the region of prsA2 (CD630_35000) was designed with the help of the ClosTron website1 using the Perutka algorithm (Perutka et al., 2004). E. coli CA434 was transformed with customized vectors for mating with C. difficile 630Δerm cells as described previously (Purdy et al., 2002; Heap et al., 2009, 2010). Mutants were selected on BHIS containing 5 μg/mL erythromycin and confirmed by PCR and sequencing using gene specific primers.
Determination of Toxin Concentration in Supernatants
For determining the toxin production, exponentially growing cultures were adjusted to an OD600 nm of 0.05 in 10 mL of fresh BHIS and grown at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. After 48 h, the culture supernatants of 2 mL of each culture were harvested (5000 g, 5 min, RT) and sterile filtered using 0.2 μm syringe filters. Toxin concentrations in culture supernatants were determined using the Clostridium difficile Toxin A OR B ELISA Kit of tgcBIOMICS (tgc-E002-1) following the manual instructions.
Preparation of Spores
Spores of C. difficile were prepared with slight modifications as previously described (Sorg and Sonenshein, 2008). Bacteria were grown over night in BHIS medium, and 100 μL were spread on BHIS-agar plates, which were incubated for 10 days at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. Bacteria and spores were collected using a sterile loop and suspended in 2 mL ice cold H2Odd. Spores were separated from vegetative cells by layering this suspension onto 10 ml of sterile 50% (w/v) sucrose solution and centrifugation (3200 g, 4°C, 25 min). This step was repeated until a spore purity of > 95% was reached as assessed microscopically. Spores were washed five times with H2Odd (5000 g, 4°C, 10 min), resuspended in 1 mL of H2Odd, and stored at 4°C.
Assessment of Sporulation Rates
The spore formation was assessed microscopically as described previously (Edwards and McBride, 2016). Briefly, 100 μL of an exponentially growing culture were spread out on sporulation agar plates [63 g Bacto peptone (BD Difco), 3.5 g proteose peptone (BD Difco), 0.7 g (NH4)2SO4, 1.06 g Tris base, 11.1 g BHI extract (Roth) and 1.5 g yeast extract (BD Difco) in 1000 mL H2Odd, autoclave and add 3 ml 10% (w/v) of sterile filtered L-cysteine (Sigma-Aldrich)]. The plates were incubated at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. After 24 h, a loop full of bacteria were resuspended and fixed for 15 min at room temperature in 100 μL of PBS containing 2% (w/v) paraformaldehyde. Two to five μL of these suspensions were dropped onto a microscope slide, pictures of at least three different fields were taken, and the number of vegetative cells and spores were determined.
Germination Assays
Spore germination in response to the bile acids taurocholate (TCA) or deoxycholate (DCA) was measured optically as described previously (Sorg and Sonenshein, 2008, 2009). Briefly, spores were heat activated at 60°C for 30 min, adjusted to an OD600 nm of 0.3–0.5 in 100 μL BHIS containing 5 mM TCA or 1 mM DCA in a 96-well plate, and immediately transferred to a VarioSkanTM (ThermoFisher) plate reader at room temperature. Germination of the spores resulted in a decrease in the optical density, which was recorded every 2 min for 20 min.
Resistance Assays
Overnight cultures were refreshed 1:100 in 10 mL BHIS medium, cultured to an OD600 nm of 0.8–1.0, and adjusted to 0.1 in BHIS medium. Bile acids (20 mM stock solution in DMSO) or antibiotics (5 mM stock solution in DMSO) were serially diluted 1:1 in a 96-well plate in 100 μL BHIS containing 10% (v/v) DMSO. Following this, 100 μL of the bacterial solution were added into each well resulting in a final OD of 0.05 and a final DMSO concentration of 5% (v/v). Bacteria were grown for 12–16 h at 37°C under anaerobic conditions, and the final OD was measured at 600 nm using a VarioSkanTM (ThermoFisher) plate reader. Medium containing 5% (v/v) DMSO served as background.
Mouse Colonization Studies
Mice for C. difficile infection were bred at the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (Braunschweig, Germany) under enhanced specific pathogen free conditions. CHOW AND IVC. 16–20 weeks old mice (GENDER) were treated with an intraperitoneal injection of clindamycin (10mg/kg body weight, Sigma) and 24 h later orally infected with 1000 spores of the indicated strains of C. difficile. Twenty four hours after infection, fecal samples were collected and mice were euthanized to obtain cecum and colon content. Samples were weighed and homogenized, after which aliquots of homogenized contents were heated for 20 min at 65°C to kill vegetative cells. To determine CFU of vegetative cells and spores, non-heated and heated samples were plated on CLO agar plates (BioMerieux, 43431), which were for the heated samples supplemented with taurocholate (0.1% w/v, Roth) to induce germination of spores. Plates were incubated for 3 days at 37°C in an anaerobic environment (Anaerocult A, Merck). All experiments were performed in strict accordance with the German Recommendation of the Society for Laboratory Animal Science (GV-SOLAS) and the European Health Recommendations of the Federation of Laboratory Animal Science Associations. The animal protocol was approved by the “Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit”: (33.9-42502-04-14/1415).
Results
C. difficile Encodes Proteins With Strong Amino Acid Sequence Similarity to PPIases
We screened the reference genome of C. difficile str. 630 (NC_009089.1) for the presence of genes encoding parvulin homologs and identified four putative candidates (Table 3). Of those four, two contained putative secretion signals (SP) that can be recognized by the signal peptidase II as predicted by LipoP 1.0 (Juncker et al., 2003; Rahman et al., 2008). This is similar to L. monocytogenes where, in contrast to the model organism B. subtilis, two membrane localized PrsA-homologs are present (Cahoon et al., 2016). In order to determine the closest homolog of the virulence associated PrsA2 of L. monocytogenes (LmPrsA2), we performed an amino acid sequence alignment with Clustal Omega (Sievers et al., 2011). For this, we used the sequences of LmPrsA2 and the four putative parvulin-type PPIases from C. difficile, CD630_13570, CD630_15570, CD630_22630 as well as CD630_35000. Out of those, CD630_35000 had with 32.96% identity the highest similarity on amino acid level to LmPrsA2 and separated in this respect clearly from the remaining parvulins of C. difficile (Figure 1A). Further amino acid sequence comparisons of CdPrsA2 (CD630_35000) with LmPrsA1, LmPrsA2, BsPrsA and the human parvulin Pin1 (HsPin1) identified highly conserved amino acids, mostly in the well-defined PPIase domain (Figure 1B). This amino acid sequence alignment shows the close relatedness between BsPrsA, LmPrsA1 and LmPrsA2. Interestingly, CdPrsA2 contained a stretch of 21 amino acids (K188-K208) that was absent in the other bacterial parvulins. Interestingly, HsPin1 contains a stretch of amino acids which is approximately of the same length. Overlaying an available structural model of the PPIase domain of BsPrsA with HsPin1 showed that this stretch corresponded to a flexible loop in HsPin1 that is absent in BsPrsA (Figure 1C). The 996 bp long CdPrsA2 gene is localized on the chromosome between the gene for RNA polymerase removal factor Mfd upstream and the gene encoding the highly conserved forespore-specific transcription factor SpoVT downstream (Figure 1D) (Asen et al., 2009; Willing et al., 2015).
Table 3.
Locus tag‡ | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accession number† | 630 | 630Δerm | R20291 | SP§ | |
Q18BM5 | 13570 | 01513 | 1199 | – | |
Q18C77 | 15570 | 01726 | 1406 | + | |
Q185D5 | 22630 | 02497 | 2162 | – | |
Q180Z8 | 35000 | 03813 | 3337 | + | |
†Uniprot IDs, ‡in the reference genomes NC_009089.1 (str. 630), CP016318.1. (str. 630Δerm) and FN545816.1 (str. R20291), §signal peptide as determined by SignalP 4.1.
CdPrsA2 Is an Active Parvulin
For evaluating whether CdPrsA2 is an active parvulin, we recombinantly produced a C-terminally His-tagged CdPrsA2 lacking its putative signal peptide and lipid modification as well as its single alanine-exchange mutant variants in B. megaterium MS941 and performed in vitro protease-free PPIase assays using the substrate peptide Abz-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNA. Wild type CdPrsA2 was active in the protease-free PPIase assay with a catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of 6.78 ± 0.41 × 104 M-1s-1 (Figure 2A and Table 4). In order to functionally identify amino acid residues involved in the observed enzymatic activity, conserved residues of the PPIase domain were deduced from the outlined amino acid sequence comparisons (D232, L241, M249, F253, T271, Y273, H276). Additionally, K188 was selected due to its possible functional homology to K63 in HsPin1 (Zhou et al., 2000) (Figure 1B). Among the eight amino acid replacements, Y273A, T271A, and F253A were the most deleterious ones with catalytic efficiencies dropping to 1.06 ± 0.24 × 103 M-1s-1, 1.06 ± 0.10 × 103 M-1s-1, 1.61 ± 0.23 × 103 M-1s-1, respectively, and resulting in an activity loss of about 98% compared to the wild type protein. This was followed L241A with 92% reduced activity and a catalytic efficiency of 5.02 ± 0.50 × 103 M-1s-1 (Figure 2B). Two substitution mutants, namely M249A and H276A, revealed activity losses of about 20 and 70%, respectively. Also, exchanging the non-canonical K188 by alanine caused a loss in activity by about 45% to a kcat/Km value of 3.65 02 ± 0.40 × 104 M-1s-1. In contrast, substituting D232 by an alanine caused an opposite effect and increased the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme 2.6-fold to 1.80 ± 0.05 × 105 M-1s-1 (Figure 2B).
Table 4.
PrsA2 | kcat/Km (M-1 s-1) |
---|---|
Wild type | (6.78 ± 0.41) × 104 |
D232A | (1.80 ± 0.05) × 105 |
M249A | (5.49 ± 0.16) × 104 |
Y273A | (1.06 ± 0.24) × 103 |
H276A | (2.61 ± 0.06) × 104 |
K188A | (3.65 ± 0.40) × 104 |
T271A | (1.06 ± 0.10) × 103 |
F253A | (1.61 ± 0.23) × 103 |
L241A | (5.02 ± 0.50) × 103 |
Next, we analyzed the substrate preference of CdPrsA2 by using the wild type protein with variants of the substrate peptide Abz-Ala-Xaa-Pro-Phe-pNA containing different amino acid residues Xaa preceding the proline residue (Table 5). The catalytic efficiency of CdPrsA2 for a substrate peptide with leucine instead of alanine was with 8.5 × 105 M-1s-1 about 2.6-fold increased. We concluded a clear preference of CdPrsA2 toward positively charged amino acids preceding proline, as the peptides containing arginine or lysine were isomerized 2.3-fold and 1.76-fold faster resulting in kcat/Km values of 7.58 × 105 M-1s-1 and 5.67 × 105 M-1s-1, respectively. In agreement with this, the catalytic efficiency for a substrate peptide with the negatively charged glutamate was reduced by around 90% to 3.2 × 104 M-1s-1. Peptides containing isoleucine or valine were less suitable substrates as their kcat/Km values were reduced by 87 and 92% to 4.26 × 104 M-1s-1 and 2.7 × 104 M-1s-1, respectively (Figure 2C).
Table 5.
Xaaa | kcat/Km (M-1 s-1) |
---|---|
Ala | (3.21 ± 0.27) × 105 |
Leu | (8.50 ± 0.67) × 105 |
Ile | (4.26 ± 0.51) × 104 |
Val | (2.70 ± 0.23) × 104 |
Lys | (5.67 ± 1.30) × 105 |
Arg | (7.58 ± 1.85) × 105 |
Glu | (3.20 ± 0.26) × 104 |
Gln | (3.96 ± 0.08) × 105 |
Met | (5.77 ± 1.22) × 105 |
Phe | (3.33 ± 0.58) × 105 |
Tyr | (1.63 ± 0.32) × 105 |
Trp | (2.58 ± 0.40) × 105 |
aAmino acids used to replace the position preceding proline in the substrate peptide Abz-Ala-Xaa-Pro-Phe-pNA.
CdPrsA2 Is Involved in Stress Responses
Next, we analyzed its physiological role by disrupting the CdPrsA2 gene using the ClosTron technology. The ClosTron element was found inserted between bps 262 and 263 (Figure 1D). The mutant revealed no obvious growth defect in rich BHIS-medium (Figure 3A). Similarly, the spore forming capacity and the toxin titres of stationary liquid cultures were comparable between the prsA2::ClosTron mutant and its isogenic wild type (Figures 3B,C). PPIases are typically involved in various stress responses in bacteria. Consequently, we analyzed the contribution of CdPrsA2 to different stress responses of C. difficile. As stressors we used the two most common therapeutic antibiotics, vancomycin and metronidazole, and the two main secondary bile acids of the healthy intestine, lithocholic acid (LCA) and deoxycholic acid (DCA) that inhibit vegetative cell growth. When treated with vancomycin, no significant difference between the wild type strain and its isogenic prsA2::ClosTron mutant was detected (Figure 4A). In contrast, a significant reduction in resistance from 16 to 8 μM metronidazole was observed for the mutant strain (Figure 4B). The mutant strain was found less susceptible toward bile acids, with 31 μM of LCA (Figure 4C) and 125 μM of DCA (Figure 4D), concentrations at which the vegetative growth of the wild type strain was significantly impaired.
Response to Germination Inducing Bile Salts Is Impaired in Spores Lacking CdPrsA2
The germination of spores is the crucial step for colonization and developing acute CDI. Accordingly, we evaluated the response of spores derived from the wild type strain and isogenic prsA2::ClosTron mutant. For this purpose, we used the bile acid DCA at a concentration of 1 mM and sodium taurocholate (TCA) with 5 mM and monitored the initial stages of germination by measuring the drop in OD at 600 nm every 2 min for 20 min after the addition of the respective bile acid. The change in relative OD indicated a significant response of the wild type strain to both bile acids. The relative OD decreased by about 20% during treatment with 1 mM DCA (Figure 5A) and by about 25% with 5 mM TCA (Figure 5B) until it reached a plateau at 20 min. In contrast, spores of the prsA2 deficient mutant did not respond to both bile acids in the same time frame and showed less than 5% loss in OD (Figures 5A,B).
CdPrsA2 Contributes to Colonization of Mice
Having seen the differential effects in C. difficile regarding bile acid responses, we evaluated the prsA2 deficient mutant in a mouse colonization model. For this purpose, 4 months old mice that had been treated with clindamycin were infected orally with 1000 spores of C. difficile str. 630Δerm or its isogenic prsA2::ClosTron mutant. The mice were sacrificed 24 h after infection, and the cecum and colon contents as well as the feces were collected. The colonization of the mice was assessed by determining the colony forming units (cfu) of each strain on selective agar. Mice infected with wild type spores yielded a higher bacterial burden in their cecum and colon compared to the mutant strain (Figures 6A,B). In the cecum, 106 cfu/g of vegetative cells were recovered. This was about 10-fold and by this significantly higher (p ≤ 0.01) than in mice infected with the PrsA2-deficient mutant (Figure 6A). This difference was even higher in the colon, where 105 cfu/g of vegetative cells of wild type compared to about 5 × 103 cfu/g (p ≤ 0.001) of vegetative cells of the mutant were recovered (Figure 6B). In contrast, no difference in the count of vegetative cells was observed between the strains in the feces, where about 3.5 × 103 cfu/g were recovered for both strains (Figure 6C). The spore numbers of the wild type were with 4.5 × 104 vs. 3.2 × 103 cfu/g in the colon and 5.2 × 105 vs. 104 cfu/g in feces significantly higher for the wild type (Figures 6B,C). No significant differences in the spore counts were measured in the cecum (Figure 6A).
Discussion
The multi-resistant pathogen C. difficile is a steadily growing problem for the health care systems of industrialized countries as its spread goes along with the broad use of antibiotics in communities with a demographic change toward a care-intensive population. While the acute disease is mainly caused by the enterotoxic activity of two large clostridial toxins, TcdA and TcdB, there are many additional factors that influence colonization, persistence and recurrence. However, the systematic investigation of non-toxin virulence factors lags considerably behind that of TcdA and TcdB. Accordingly, in this study we aimed at narrowing this gap by characterizing the PrsA2-homolog, a parvulin-type PPIase, of C. difficile.
PrsA of B. subtilis is important for the secretion of extracellular proteins (Kontinen et al., 1991; Jacobs et al., 1993; Yan and Wu, 2017; Ma et al., 2018). Homologs of PrsA in pathogenic bacteria very often contribute to pathogenicity by the secretion of extracellular virulence factors (Ünal and Steinert, 2014; Jiang et al., 2016; Wiemels et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2018). The most prominent example of these proteins is LmPrsA2 of L. monocytogenes, which has in addition to many other pathogens like S. aureus or Streptococci two homologs of this protein (Cahoon and Freitag, 2014). For our study, we identified all four putative parvulin-like PPIases of C. difficile and determined by sequence homology that CD630_35000 is the closest homolog to LmPrsA2. Additionally, CD630_35000 was confirmed as a lipoprotein in an experimental lipoproteomic approach (Charlton et al., 2015). Further analysis revealed that CdPrsA2, although closely related to the PrsA2 proteins of B. subtilis and L. monocytogenes, may have structural differences that might have functional consequences. The most interesting in this respect is certainly an additional 21 amino acid long stretch starting with K188 (Figure 1C). This stretch exhibits a certain similarity to a loop region in the human parvulin Pin1 that is involved in enzymatic activity and substrate discrimination (Zhou et al., 2000). In the light of these preliminary findings we decided to perform a systematic substitution analysis with conserved amino acids. Here, we demonstrated that the recombinant protein was indeed an active parvulin and that the most conserved amino acids within the PPIase domain, namely L241, F253 and Y273 are crucial for its enzymatic activity (Figure 2B). Substituting D232 with alanine resulted in increased PPIase activity suggesting that this residue also contributes to substrate selectivity. Interestingly, K188, which corresponds to K63 in human Pin1 but is not present in other PrsA2 proteins analyzed, also influences the activity of CdPrsA2. In Pin1, this positively charged residue together with R68 and R69 form a basic cluster which recognizes phospho-serine or phospho-threonine residues and facilitates its participation in mammalian signaling cascades (Zhou et al., 2000). With this substrate specificity Pin1 takes a special place among eukaryotic PPIases, whereas there are no reports for a selectivity toward phosphorylated amino acids in bacterial PPIases. Thus, we elucidated the substrate specificity of recombinant wild type CdPrsA2. Interestingly, we observed a clear preference of CdPrsA2 toward substrates containing positively charged amino acids preceding proline, which is similar to the substrate specificity of the second human parvulin Par14 (Uchida et al., 1999). Probably, K188 in CdPrsA2 does not contribute to substrate selectivity as K63 in Pin1. In contrast to Pin1, the 21 amino acid stretch of CdPrsA2 contains three aspartate residues and thus, might determine the preference for positively charged substrates together with D232. Also, it should be noted that CdPrsA2 might have a relatively broad substrate spectrum as the cis/trans isomerization of peptides with leucine, glutamine, methionine and phenylalanine preceding the proline was also accelerated at high rates.
In order to analyze the role of CdPrsA2 in C. difficile physiology, we generated a gene disruption mutant using the ClosTron technology. The mutant showed no major differences regarding growth in BHIS, sporulation on agar or toxin titres. Furthermore, the prsA2::ClosTron mutant and the wild type were comparably susceptible toward the cell wall targeting antibiotic vancomycin. In contrast, an increased susceptibility toward metronidazole, the second common first line antibiotic against CDI, was observed in the mutant (Figure 4B). This antibiotic that is administered against anaerobic pathogens exerts its activity mainly by causing DNA damage (Dhand and Snydman, 2009). In recent years, the resistance toward this considerably cheap antibiotic has constantly been rising among C. difficile isolates. However, the exact mechanisms conferring metronidazole resistance in C. difficile are not known. Suggested are increased activity of nitroreductases, iron uptake and DNA repair mechanisms (Peng et al., 2017). Among these, CdPrsA2 might influence the iron uptake by modulating the concentration or activity of membrane associated transporters.
Interestingly, in the absence of PrsA2 the resistance of C. difficile toward the secondary bile acids LCA and DCA significantly increased. The antibacterial effect of bile acids is a well-known phenomenon, as the probability and severity of acute CDI clearly correlate with the bile acid status of the host (Sung et al., 1993; Buffie et al., 2015). Nevertheless, the exact mode of action for the antibiotic activity of bile acids is still speculative. Considering their mainly hydrophobic nature, the disturbance of bacterial membranes is the most likely mode of action followed by interfering with the stability of cellular macromolecules like DNA, RNA or proteins. Most common bile tolerance or resistance mechanisms in bacteria include the modification of the outer membrane in Gram-negatives as well as the upregulation of transporters, efflux pumps or bile acid modifying enzymes in Gram-negative and Gram-positives (Begley et al., 2005). Many bacteria of the commensal microbiome, like C. scindens, are known to convert primary bile acids of the host to secondary bile acids that exert antibacterial activity on vegetative C. difficile and inhibit spore germination which contributes to the naïve colonization barrier in healthy individuals (Sorg and Sonenshein, 2009; Studer et al., 2016; Weingarden et al., 2016). In addition, especially the primary bile acid TCA and the secondary bile acid DCA induce germination of the spores, which is the key event leading to acute disease (Sorg and Sonenshein, 2008). How C. difficile might directly cope with bile acid stress is currently not known. Only recently a bile acid modifying 7α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase was biochemically characterized, while its contribution to bile acid dependent physiology of the bacterium remains unsolved (Bakonyi and Hummel, 2017). Considering the increase in resistance in the CdPrsA2-deficient mutant and a probable role of the protein in the composition of the outer layer of the bacterium, it is very likely that the interaction of LCA or DCA with the bacteria is hampered either by the reduced presence of a yet unknown receptor or a membrane modifying enzyme.
Most interestingly, PrsA2 deficiency resulted in a substantial loss in germination in response to the bile acids TCA and DCA (Figure 5). The germination is the initial step in the transformation to toxin producing vegetative cells and as such the development of acute disease. Germination in C. difficile differs from other clostridia and the model organism B. subtilis in regard to the regulatory cascades that are activated upon the detection of bile acids and amino acids as germination signals. Its main actors are the bile acid receptor CspC and the downstream proteases CspA, CspB, and SleC (Burns et al., 2010; Francis et al., 2013; Paredes-Sabja et al., 2014). How PrsA2 influences the germination of C. difficile still needs to be analyzed in detail, but the reduced response toward bile acids could also explain the reduced capability of the mutant to colonize mice. In orally infected mice the number of vegetative cells 24 h p.i. were significantly reduced in the cecum and colon. The same was true for the number of spores in the colon and feces, whereas interestingly the spore numbers in the cecum were comparable. This might indicate that the wild type due to a normal response toward bile acids can transform much earlier and more efficiently into vegetative cells and start the colonization. This early onset of infection most probably leads also to higher spore burden in the distal part of the gastrointestinal tract and finally in the feces. CdPrsA2, like all the other PPIases of C. difficile, has consistently been found in proteomic studies including the spore (Lawley et al., 2009; Charlton et al., 2015). However, CdPrsA2 was shown to be the only PPIase that was significantly upregulated throughout the first 30 h of infection in mice indicating that it actively participates in the infection process (Fletcher et al., 2018).
Conclusion
We suggest that the extracellular PPIase PrsA2 of C. difficile is enzymatically active with a preference for substrates containing positively charged amino acids. Furthermore, it acts as a virulence modulator by influencing important processes including germination and bile acid resistance that all together contribute to the colonization efficiency of the bacteria. By this, it is part of the virulence repertoire of C. difficile whose pathogenic potential reaches beyond the toxic activity of TcdA and TcdB.
Author Contributions
CÜ, CS-F, NS, MB, TS, DJ, and MS conceived the experiments. CÜ, CS-F, NS, MB, and CP conducted the experiments. CÜ, NS, and CS-F analyzed the data. CÜ and MS drafted and finalized the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to S. Ross and B. Korge for technical assistance.
Funding. This work was supported by the Federal State of Lower Saxony, Niedersächsisches Vorab (VWZN2889) and by the Max Planck Society.
References
- Alonzo F., Freitag N. E. (2010). Listeria monocytogenes PrsA2 is required for virulence factor secretion and bacterial viability within the host cell cytosol. Infect. Immun. 78 4944–4957. 10.1128/IAI.00532-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alonzo F., Xayarath B., Whisstock J. C., Freitag N. E. (2011). Functional analysis of the Listeria monocytogenes secretion chaperone PrsA2 and its multiple contributions to bacterial virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 80 1530–1548. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07665.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asen I., Djuranovic S., Lupas A. N., Zeth K. (2009). Crystal structure of SpoVT, the final modulator of gene expression during spore development in Bacillus subtilis. J. Mol. Biol. 386 962–975. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bakonyi D., Hummel W. (2017). Cloning, expression, and biochemical characterization of a novel NADP+-dependent 7α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from Clostridium difficile and its application for the oxidation of bile acids. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 99 16–24. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2016.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barbut F., Gariazzo B., Bonné L., Lalande V., Burghoffer B., Luiuz R., et al. (2007). Clinical features of Clostridium difficile-associated infections and molecular characterization of strains: results of a retrospective study, 2000-2004. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 28 131–139. 10.1086/511794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bartlett J. G., Onderdonk A. B., Cisneros R. L., Kasper D. L. (1977). Clindamycin-associated colitis due to a toxin-producing species of Clostridium in hamsters. J. Infect. Dis. 136 701–705. 10.1093/infdis/136.5.701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Begley M., Gahan C. G. M., Hill C. (2005). The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29 625–651. 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behrens-Kneip S. (2010). The role of SurA factor in outer membrane protein transport and virulence. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 300 421–428. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Biedendieck R., Borgmeier C., Bunk B., Stammen S., Scherling C., Meinhardt F., et al. (2011). Systems biology of recombinant protein production using Bacillus megaterium. Methods Enzymol. 500 165–195. 10.1016/B978-0-12-385118-5.00010-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buffie C. G., Bucci V., Stein R. R., McKenney P. T., Ling L., Gobourne A., et al. (2015). Precision microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to Clostridium difficile. Nature 517 205–208. 10.1038/nature13828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burke K. E., Lamont J. T. (2014). Clostridium difficile infection: a worldwide disease. Gut Liver 8 1–6. 10.5009/gnl.2014.8.1.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burns D. A., Heap J. T., Minton N. P. (2010). SleC is essential for germination of Clostridium difficile spores in nutrient-rich medium supplemented with the bile salt taurocholate. J. Bacteriol. 192 657–664. 10.1128/JB.01209-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cahoon L. A., Freitag N. E. (2014). Listeria monocytogenes virulence factor secretion: don’t leave the cell without a chaperone. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4:13 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cahoon L. A., Freitag N. E., Prehna G. (2016). A structural comparison of Listeria monocytogenes protein chaperones PrsA1 and PrsA2 reveals molecular features required for virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 101 42–61. 10.1111/mmi.13367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chandrasekaran R., Lacy D. B. (2017). The role of toxins in Clostridium difficile infection. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 41 723–750. 10.1093/femsre/fux048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlton T. M., Kovacs-Simon A., Michell S. L., Fairweather N. F., Tate E. W. (2015). Quantitative lipoproteomics in Clostridium difficile reveals a role for lipoproteins in sporulation. Chem. Biol. 22 1562–1573. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cincarova L., Polansky O., Babak V., Kulich P., Kralik P. (2016). Changes in the expression of biofilm-associated surface proteins in Staphylococcus aureus food-environmental isolates subjected to sublethal concentrations of disinfectants. BioMed. Res. Int. 2016:4034517. 10.1155/2016/4034517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dhand A., Snydman D. R. (2009). “Mechanism of resistance in metronidazole,” in Antimicrobial Drug Resistance Infectious Disease, ed. Mayers D. L. (New York, NY: Humana Press; ), 223–227. [Google Scholar]
- Dunyak B. M., Gestwicki J. E. (2016). Peptidyl-Proline Isomerases (PPIases): Targets for natural products and natural product-inspired compounds. J. Med. Chem. 59 9622–9644. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards A. N., McBride S. M. (2016). Isolating and Purifying Clostridium difficile spores. Methods Mol. Biol. 1476 117–128. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6361-4_9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer G., Bang H. (1985). The refolding of urea-denatured ribonuclease A is catalyzed by peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 828 39–42. 10.1016/0167-4838(85)90006-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer G., Bang H., Mech C. (1984). [Determination of enzymatic catalysis for the cis-trans-isomerization of peptide binding in proline-containing peptides]. Biomed. Biochim. Acta 43 1101–1111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fletcher J. R., Erwin S., Lanzas C., Theriot C. M. (2018). Shifts in the GUT METABOLOME and Clostridium difficile transcriptome throughout colonization and infection in a mouse model. mSphere 3:e00089-18. 10.1128/mSphere.00089-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forster B. M., Zemansky J., Portnoy D. A., Marquis H. (2011). Posttranslocation chaperone PrsA2 regulates the maturation and secretion of Listeria monocytogenes proprotein virulence factors. J. Bacteriol. 193 5961–5970. 10.1128/JB.05307-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Francis M. B., Allen C. A., Shrestha R., Sorg J. A. (2013). Bile acid recognition by the Clostridium difficile germinant receptor, CspC, is important for establishing infection. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003356. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geric B., Rupnik M., Gerding D. N., Grabnar M., Johnson S. (2004). Distribution of Clostridium difficile variant toxinotypes and strains with binary toxin genes among clinical isolates in an American hospital. J. Med. Microbiol. 53 887–894. 10.1099/jmm.0.45610-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grant S. G., Jessee J., Bloom F. R., Hanahan D. (1990). Differential plasmid rescue from transgenic mouse DNAs into Escherichia coli methylation-restriction mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87 4645–4649. 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heap J. T., Kuehne S. A., Ehsaan M., Cartman S. T., Cooksley C. M., Scott J. C., et al. (2010). The ClosTron: mutagenesis in Clostridium refined and streamlined. J. Microbiol. Methods 80 49–55. 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heap J. T., Pennington O. J., Cartman S. T., Carter G. P., Minton N. P. (2007). The ClosTron: a universal gene knock-out system for the genus Clostridium. J. Microbiol. Methods 70 452–464. 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heap J. T., Pennington O. J., Cartman S. T., Minton N. P. (2009). A modular system for Clostridium shuttle plasmids. J. Microbiol. Methods 78 79–85. 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hopkins R. J., Wilson R. B. (2018). Treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile colitis: a narrative review. Gastroenterol. Rep. 6 21–28. 10.1093/gastro/gox041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hussain H. A., Roberts A. P., Mullany P. (2005). Generation of an erythromycin-sensitive derivative of Clostridium difficile strain 630 (630Deltaerm) and demonstration that the conjugative transposon Tn916DeltaE enters the genome of this strain at multiple sites. J. Med. Microbiol. 54 137–141. 10.1099/jmm.0.45790-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ikolo F., Zhang M., Harrington D. J., Robinson C., Waller A. S., Sutcliffe I. C., et al. (2015). Characterisation of SEQ0694 (PrsA/PrtM) of Streptococcus equi as a functional peptidyl-prolyl isomerase affecting multiple secreted protein substrates. Mol. Biosyst. 11 3279–3286. 10.1039/c5mb00543d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs M., Andersen J. B., Kontinen V., Sarvas M. (1993). Bacillus subtilis PrsA is required in vivo as an extracytoplasmic chaperone for secretion of active enzymes synthesized either with or without pro-sequences. Mol. Microbiol. 8 957–966. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01640.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janoir C. (2016). Virulence factors of Clostridium difficile and their role during infection. Anaerobe 37 13–24. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang X., Yang Y., Zhou J., Zhu L., Gu Y., Zhang X., et al. (2016). Roles of the putative type IV-like secretion system key component VirD4 and PrsA in pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis Type 2. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 6:172. 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Juncker A. S., Willenbrock H., Von Heijne G., Brunak S., Nielsen H., Krogh A. (2003). Prediction of lipoprotein signal peptides in Gram-negative bacteria. Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc. 12 1652–1662. 10.1110/ps.0303703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kontinen V. P., Saris P., Sarvas M. (1991). A gene (prsA) of Bacillus subtilis involved in a novel, late stage of protein export. Mol. Microbiol. 5 1273–1283. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01901.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawley T. D., Croucher N. J., Yu L., Clare S., Sebaihia M., Goulding D., et al. (2009). Proteomic and genomic characterization of highly infectious Clostridium difficile 630 spores. J. Bacteriol. 191 5377–5386. 10.1128/JB.00597-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin M.-H., Li C.-C., Shu J.-C., Chu H.-W., Liu C.-C., Wu C.-C. (2018). Exoproteome profiling reveals the involvement of the foldase PrsA in the cell surface properties and pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus. Proteomics 18:e1700195. 10.1002/pmic.201700195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lusk R. H., Fekety R., Silva J., Browne R. A., Ringler D. H., Abrams G. D. (1978). Clindamycin-induced enterocolitis in hamsters. J. Infect. Dis. 137 464–475. 10.1093/infdis/137.4.464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyu Z. X., Zhao X. S. (2015). Periplasmic quality control in biogenesis of outer membrane proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 43 133–138. 10.1042/BST20140217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma R. J., Wang Y. H., Liu L., Bai L. L., Ban R. (2018). Production enhancement of the extracellular lipase LipA in Bacillus subtilis: effects of expression system and Sec pathway components. Protein Expr. Purif. 142 81–87. 10.1016/j.pep.2017.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Notredame C., Higgins D. G., Heringa J. (2000). T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 302 205–217. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paredes-Sabja D., Shen A., Sorg J. A. (2014). Clostridium difficile spore biology: sporulation, germination, and spore structural proteins. Trends Microbiol. 22 406–416. 10.1016/j.tim.2014.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Péchiné S., Bruxelle J. F., Janoir C., Collignon A. (2018). Targeting Clostridium difficile surface components to develop immunotherapeutic strategies against Clostridium difficile infection. Front. Microbiol. 9:1009. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peng Z., Jin D., Kim H. B., Stratton C. W., Wu B., Tang Y.-W., et al. (2017). Update on antimicrobial resistance in Clostridium difficile: resistance mechanisms and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 55 1998–2008. 10.1128/JCM.02250-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perutka J., Wang W., Goerlitz D., Lambowitz A. M. (2004). Use of computer-designed group II introns to disrupt Escherichia coli DExH/D-box protein and DNA helicase genes. J. Mol. Biol. 336 421–439. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Purdy D., O’Keeffe T. A. T., Elmore M., Herbert M., McLeod A., Bokori-Brown M., et al. (2002). Conjugative transfer of clostridial shuttle vectors from Escherichia coli to Clostridium difficile through circumvention of the restriction barrier. Mol. Microbiol. 46 439–452. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03134.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rahfeld J. U., Rücknagel K. P., Schelbert B., Ludwig B., Hacker J., Mann K., et al. (1994). Confirmation of the existence of a third family among peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerases. Amino acid sequence and recombinant production of parvulin. FEBS Lett. 352 180–184. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00932-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rahman O., Cummings S. P., Harrington D. J., Sutcliffe I. C. (2008). Methods for the bioinformatic identification of bacterial lipoproteins encoded in the genomes of Gram-positive bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24 2377–2382. 10.1007/s11274-008-9795-2 15539077 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rasch J., Ünal C. M., Steinert M. (2014). Peptidylprolyl cis-trans isomerases of Legionella pneumophila: virulence, moonlighting and novel therapeutic targets. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 42 1728–1733. 10.1042/BST20140202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rupnik M., Wilcox M. H., Gerding D. N. (2009). Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7 526–536. 10.1038/nrmicro2164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schiene-Fischer C., Aumüller T., Fischer G. (2013). Peptide bond cis/trans isomerases: a biocatalysis perspective of conformational dynamics in proteins. Top. Curr. Chem. 328 35–67. 10.1007/128_2011_151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siekierka J. J., Hung S. H., Poe M., Lin C. S., Sigal N. H. (1989). A cytosolic binding protein for the immunosuppressant FK506 has peptidyl-prolyl isomerase activity but is distinct from cyclophilin. Nature 341 755–757. 10.1038/341755a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sievers F., Wilm A., Dineen D., Gibson T. J., Karplus K., Li W., et al. (2011). Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7:539. 10.1038/msb.2011.75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sorg J. A., Sonenshein A. L. (2008). Bile salts and glycine as cogerminants for Clostridium difficile spores. J. Bacteriol. 190 2505–2512. 10.1128/JB.01765-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sorg J. A., Sonenshein A. L. (2009). Chenodeoxycholate is an inhibitor of Clostridium difficile spore germination. J. Bacteriol. 191 1115–1117. 10.1128/JB.01260-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stammen S., Müller B. K., Korneli C., Biedendieck R., Gamer M., Franco-Lara E., et al. (2010). High-yield intra- and extracellular protein production using Bacillus megaterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76 4037–4046. 10.1128/AEM.00431-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Studer N., Desharnais L., Beutler M., Brugiroux S., Terrazos M. A., Menin L., et al. (2016). Functional intestinal bile acid 7α-dehydroxylation by Clostridium scindens associated with protection from Clostridium difficile infection in a gnotobiotic mouse model. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 6:191 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sung J. Y., Shaffer E. A., Costerton J. W. (1993). Antibacterial activity of bile salts against common biliary pathogens. Effects of hydrophobicity of the molecule and in the presence of phospholipids. Dig. Dis. Sci. 38 2104–2112. 10.1007/BF01297092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor W. R. (1986). The classification of amino acid conservation. J. Theor. Biol. 119 205–218. 10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80075-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Theriot C. M., Bowman A. A., Young V. B. (2016). Antibiotic-induced alterations of the gut microbiota alter secondary bile acid production and allow for Clostridium difficile spore germination and outgrowth in the large intestine. mSphere 1:e00045-15. 10.1128/mSphere.00045-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uchida T., Fujimori F., Tradler T., Fischer G., Rahfeld J. U. (1999). Identification and characterization of a 14 kDa human protein as a novel parvulin-like peptidyl prolyl cis/trans isomerase. FEBS Lett. 446 278–282. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00239-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ünal C. M., Steinert M. (2014). Microbial peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerases (PPIases): virulence factors and potential alternative drug targets. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78 544–571. 10.1128/MMBR.00015-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ünal C. M., Steinert M. (2016). Novel therapeutic strategies for Clostridium difficile infections. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 20 269–285. 10.1517/14728222.2016.1090428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vitikainen M., Lappalainen I., Seppala R., Antelmann H., Boer H., Taira S., et al. (2004). Structure-function analysis of PrsA reveals roles for the parvulin-like and flanking N- and C-terminal domains in protein folding and secretion in Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Chem. 279 19302–19314. 10.1074/jbc.M400861200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waterhouse A. M., Procter J. B., Martin D. M. A., Clamp M., Barton G. J. (2009). Jalview Version 2–a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25 1189–1191. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weingarden A. R., Chen C., Zhang N., Graiziger C. T., Dosa P. I., Steer C. J., et al. (2016). Ursodeoxycholic acid inhibits Clostridium difficile spore germination and vegetative growth, and prevents the recurrence of ileal pouchitis associated with the infection. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 50 624–630. 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiemels R. E., Cech S. M., Meyer N. M., Burke C. A., Weiss A., Parks A. R., et al. (2017). An intracellular peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase is required for folding and activity of the Staphylococcus aureus secreted virulence factor nuclease. J. Bacteriol 199:e00453-16. 10.1128/JB.00453-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Willing S. E., Richards E. J., Sempere L., Dale A. G., Cutting S. M., Fairweather N. F. (2015). Increased toxin expression in a Clostridium difficile mfd mutant. BMC Microbiol. 15:280. 10.1186/s12866-015-0611-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wittchen K. D., Meinhardt F. (1995). Inactivation of the major extracellular protease from Bacillus megaterium DSM319 by gene replacement. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 42 871–877. 10.1007/BF00191184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan S., Wu G. (2017). Bottleneck in secretion of α-amylase in Bacillus subtilis. Microb. Cell Factories 16:124. 10.1186/s12934-017-0738-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zemansky J., Kline B. C., Woodward J. J., Leber J. H., Marquis H., Portnoy D. A. (2009). Development of a mariner-based transposon and identification of Listeria monocytogenes determinants, including the peptidyl-prolyl isomerase PrsA2, that contribute to its hemolytic phenotype. J. Bacteriol. 191 3950–3964. 10.1128/JB.00016-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou X. Z., Kops O., Werner A., Lu P.-J., Shen M., Stoller G., et al. (2000). Pin1-dependent prolyl isomerization regulates dephosphorylation of Cdc25C and Tau proteins. Mol. Cell 6 873–883. 10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00083-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zoldák G., Aumüller T., Lücke C., Hritz J., Oostenbrink C., Fischer G., et al. (2009). A library of fluorescent peptides for exploring the substrate specificities of prolyl isomerases. Biochemistry 48 10423–10436. 10.1021/bi9014242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]