Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Signal. 2018 Oct 6;53:132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.10.004

Hepatic signalling disruption by pollutant Polychlorinated biphenyls in steatohepatitis

Josiah E Hardesty a, Banrida Wahlang c,i, K Cameron Falkner c,g, Hongxue Shi b, Jian Jin b, Daniel Wilkey f, Michael Merchant f, Corey Watson a, Russell A Prough a, Matthew C Cave a,b,c,d,e,g,h,i
PMCID: PMC6289731  NIHMSID: NIHMS1509406  PMID: 30300668

Abstract

Background:

Polychlorinated biphenyl-mediated steatohepatitis has been shown to be due in part to inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling. EGFR signalling regulates many facets of hepatocyte function, but it is unclear which other kinases and pathways are involved in the development of toxicant-associated steatohepatitis (TASH).

Methods:

Comparative hepatic phosphoproteomic analysis was used to identify which kinases were affected by either PCB exposure (Aroclor 1260 mixture), high fat diet (HFD), or their interaction in a chronic exposure model of TASH. Cellular assays and western blot analysis were used to validate the phosphoproteomic findings.

Results:

1760 unique phosphorylated peptides were identified and of those 588 were significantly different. PCB exposure and dietary interaction promoted a near 25% reduction of hepatic phospho-peptides. Leptin and insulin signalling were pathways highly affected by PCB exposure and liver necrosis was a pathologic ontology over represented due to interaction between PCBs and a HFD. Casein kinase 2 (CK2), Extracellular regulated kinase (ERK), Protein kinase B (AKT), and Cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) activity were demonstrated to be downregulated after PCB exposure and this downregulation was exacerbated with a HFD. PCB exposure led to a loss of hepatic CK2 subunit expression limiting CK2 kinase activity and negatively regulating caspase-3 (CASP3). PCBs promoted secondary necrosis in vitro validating the latter observation. The loss of hepatic phosphoprotein signalling appeared to be due to decreased signal transduction rather than phosphatase upregulation.

Conclusions:

PCBs are signal disrupting chemicals that promote secondary necrosis through affecting a myriad of liver processes including metabolism and cellular maintenance. PCB exposure, particularly with interaction with a HFD greatly down- regulates the hepatic kinome. More data are needed on signalling disruption and its impact on liver health.

Keywords: Polychlorinated biphenyls, signalling disruption, secondary necrosis, casein kinase 2

INTRODUCTION:

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are endocrine, metabolic, and signalling disrupting chemicals (EDCs, MDCs, SDCs) [1, 2]. PCBs still persist in the environment even though their production has long been banned. The primary route of human exposure is through consumption of contaminated food leading to bioaccumulation [3]. The global prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently at 25% and cannot be fully explained by dietary, genetic, or level of physical activity [4]. Chemical pollutant exposures may be an understudied pathogenic factor in this epidemic of fatty liver disease. Metabolic effects due to PCBs are of great concern since 100% of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants had detectable serum levels of PCBs [5]. PCBs were associated with increased odds ratios for unexplained ALT elevation, a surrogate biomarker for NAFLD. The Anniston Community Health Survey (ACHS) is a highly exposed cohort of residents living near a former PCB manufacturing plant in Alabama. Elevated PCB body burden in this cohort was positively associated with suspected TASH and the liver necrosis marker cytokeratin 18 (KRT18) M65 [6]. In animal models that mimic these human exposures, the development of PCB-mediated TASH was contingent upon both the exposure and the feeding of a high fat diet (HFD). PCB exposure has been shown to elicit a transcriptional response of xenobiotic metabolizing genes mediated through the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) [710]. PCBs were considered direct CAR agonists, but recent studies have demonstrated that they may also act through epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition leading to indirect CAR activation [1, 11]. EGFR is a receptor tyrosine kinase that is highly expressed in the liver but little is known about its physiological role in liver homeostasis and metabolism [12]. EGFR can regulate the phosphorylation state of many downstream targets including, but not limited to CAR, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF4α), and nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NRF2) [13]. Deficits in cell signalling have pathological relevance in metabolic disease with loss of insulin signalling and diabetes being the strongest example [14]. Loss of other signalling pathways in the context of other metabolic diseases like steatohepatitis are understudied and may be just as relevant. Kinase inhibition is closely associated with cell death, metabolic disruption, and possibly steatohepatitis. To characterize the complexity of PCB-mediated signalling disruption in the liver, a phosphoproteomic approach was used. In this study, we aimed to characterize the dietary and PCB-mediated effects on the hepatic phosphoproteome in an animal model of TASH and determine how PCBs promote hepatocyte necrosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Animal Studies.

The C57BI/6 (male) mouse liver samples used in this study were obtained from archived (−80°C) tissues from a previous study [15]. This study used a protocol approved by the University of Louisville Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Guidelines provided by the NIH guide for the care and use of laboratory animals were abided by for this research. In this study, three samples per group were randomly selected and used for the proteomic study. Mice fed a HFD developed steatosis and mice fed a control diet and treated with Aroclor 1260 did not develop fatty liver. The mice fed a HFD and treated with Aroclor 1260 developed steatohepatitis [15]. The following abbreviations in the figures represent the animal groups;control diet (CD), control diet with Aroclor 1260 exposure (CD+), high fat diet (HFD), high fat diet with Aroclor exposure (HFD+).

Phospho-peptide Sample Preparation

Mouse liver tissue were homogenized in 1% SDS RIPA buffer. Protein lysate (100 μg) per sample was prepared and trypsinized using the filter aided sample prep (FASP) protocol [16]. Phosphopeptides were then further enriched with TiO2 and purified using C18 columns [17]. Peptide concentrations were measured by measuring absorbance at 205 nm to determine the recovery amount to use for subsequent liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis.

Liquid Chromatography for Separation of Phospho-peptides

The columns used were an Acclaim PepMap 100 75μm x 2cm, nanoViper (C18, 3μm, 100A) trap, and an Acclaim PepMap RSLC 50μm x 15cm, nanoViper (C18, 2μm, 100A) separating column (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). An EASY-nLC 1000 UHPLC system (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA) was used with solvents A = 2% v/v acetonitrile / 0.1% v/v formic acid and B = 80% v/v acetonitrile / 0.1% v/v formic acid as mobile phases. Following injection of 500 ng of sample onto the trap, separation was accomplished at 300 nL/min with a 110-minute linear gradient from 0% B to 50% B, followed by a 5min linear gradient from 50% B to 95% B, and lastly a 5-min wash with 95% B. A 40mm stainless steel emitter (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA) was coupled to the outlet of the separating column. A Nanospray Flex source (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA) was used to position the end of the emitter near the ion transfer capillary of the mass spectrometer. The ion transfer capillary temperature of the mass spectrometer was set at 225°C, and the spray voltage was set at 1.6 kV.

Mass Spectrometry

An Orbitrap Elite - ETD mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher) was used to collect data from the LC eluate. An Nth Order Double Play was created in Xcalibur v2.2. Scan event one of the methods obtained an FTMS MS1 scan (normal mass range;240,000 resolution, full scan type, positive polarity, profile data type) for the range 300–2000m/z. Scan event two obtained ITMS MS2 scans (normal mass range, rapid scan rate, centroid data type) on up to twenty peaks that had a minimum signal threshold of 5,000 counts from scan event one. The lock mass option was enabled (0% lock mass abundance) using the 371.101236m/z polysiloxane peak as an internal calibrant.

Data Analysis with Peaks Studio 7.5

The raw data files were analyzed separately with Peaks Studio 7.5 using the UniprotKB mouse reviewed canonical and isoform protein sequences current as of 3/21/2017 and the Denovo, PeaksDB, and PeaksPTM algorithms. Identifications at the 1% FDR threshold from the PeaksDB and PeaksPTM results were loaded into the Peaks Label Free Quantification algorithm. Data files for acquired LCMS data (.RAW), search engine files (.mgf), peak list files (.mzML) files, and search results aggregated into a Scaffold3 (.sf3, ProteomeSoftware.com) will are deposited with MasslVE (http://massive.ucsd.edu/) data repository with the Center for Computational Mass Spectrometry at the University of California, San Diego and shared with the ProteomeXchange (www.proteomexchange.org).

MetaCore Analysis

Phosphorylated proteins with significantly different abundances (p<0.05) due to a HFD, Aroclor exposure, or interaction were analyzed with MetaCore pathway, processes, and pathology ontologies. Only pathways, processes, and pathologies identified with a false discovery rate (FDR) less than or equal to 0.05 were accepted.

PhosphoScanSite Analysis

Phosphosites were searched using the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s free software PhosphoScansite 3 [18]. Low, medium, and high stringency thresholds were used to identify potential kinases regulating differentially expressed phospho-substrates.

Cell Culture

Cryopreserved human hepatocytes obtained from BioreclamationIVT supplemented with Invitrogro Hepatocyte Media and Torpedo antibiotic solution (BioreclamationlVT, Westbury, NY). The cells were plated on collagen plates and incubated in a 5% carbon dioxide atmosphere and 95% humidity at 37° C.

Cellomic Cell Death Assay

Cryopreserved human hepatocytes were exposed to either 0.5% DMSO (DMSO applied to cryopreserved human hepatocytes is not toxic up to 2% [19]) or Aroclor 1260 (10 μg/mL) for 6 and 24 hours. At each time point cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Thermo-Scientific, Waltham, MA) and imaged. Data for DNA fragmentation percent (Cells below 2N DNA content) and nuclear area were taken at each time point. Apoptosis and necrosis demonstrate DNA fragmentation but apoptotic nuclei are smaller, thus enabling these two factors to be used to distinguish between live, apoptotic, and necrotic cells [20].

Western Blot Analysis

Mouse liver lysates were homogenized in RIPA Buffer (100 mg tissue/0.5 mL RIPA supplemented with protease, and phosphatase inhibitors 10 μl/mL, (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO)). The protein concentration was determined by the bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Protein (15 μg) was separated on 7.5% SDS Gel (BioRad, Hercules, CA), transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and blocked, incubated with primary and then secondary antibodies. Western blot protein bands were quantified using BioRad Image Software. The following primary antibodies were used: CK2α, CK2 phosphosubstrate, PP2α, and CASP3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA);CK2β, PTP1B, S150 CASP3 (abcam Cambridge, UK).

Statistical Analysis

Western blot densitometry values using GraphPad Prism Version 7 for Macintosh (San Diego, CA). The data are expressed as box and whisker plots for western blot analysis (n=5) and mean ± SEM for the Cellomic data (n=24). Data was compared using two way ANOVA for western blot analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Quantified phospho-peptides from MS data were statistically compared by two-way ANOVA with a looping two-way ANOVA script in R software package. The following assumptions were verified for use of the two-way ANOVA, 2 independent variables, continuous dependent variable, categorical independent variables, sample independence, variance equality, and normality [21].

RESULTS:

Phosphoproteomic analysis identifies phosphorylated substrates altered by a HFD, Aroclor exposure, and their interaction.

An unbiased phosphoproteomic approach was implemented to identify the effects of diet and PCBs on the hepatic phosphoproteome. Fig 2A Illustrates the phosphoproteomic workflow and analysis of murine liver from control diet (CD) fed mice or HFD fed mice with or without 12-week exposure to Aroclor 1260 (20 mg/kg). 1760 unique phospho-peptides were identified in this study of which 588 were significant. Fig 2B demonstrates that 113 phospho- peptides were significantly increased, while 104 were decreased due to a high fat diet. Aroclor 1260 exposure decreased levels of 131 phospho peptides and increased 46 (Fig 2C). The interaction between a HFD and Aroclor exposure decreased 185 phospho peptides and increased only 9. Remarkably, nearly 25% of hepatic phospho-peptides were significantly decreased by either PCB or PCB-HFD interaction (Fig 2D). These data suggest that PCBs inhibit phosphoprotein signalling, consistent with our previous studies [1, 11]. However, the degree of loss of phosphoprotein signalling due to PCBs was not anticipated.

Figure 2: PhosphoScanSite 3 analysis of the significant phosphpeptides demonstrates that many kinases are downregulated with Aroclor exposure and the Aroclor and HFD interaction.

Figure 2:

A. The kinome changes predicted to be altered by a HFD, B. Aroclor exposure, C. or interaction. P-peptides that were significantly different by two-way ANOVA were used in the PhosphoScanSite 3 analysis to determine what kinase regulates the substrate.

MetaCore pathway, processes, and pathology analysis of significant peptides

Proteins with significant different abundances of phosphosites due to a HFD, Aroclor exposure, or their interaction were analyzed with MetaCore ontologies. Table 1A demonstrates that a HFD affected ontologies involved in lipid accumulation, adiponectin signalling, and lipoprotein assembly. Table 1B illustrates that Aroclor exposure affects pathways involved in PI3K, insulin, LXR, FXR, short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (butanoic, propanoic acids), and Sirtuin signalling. Table 1C demonstrates that HFD and Aroclor interaction affected liver necrosis and protein chaperones.

Table 1: MetaCore pathway, processes, and pathology analysis of peptides affected by a HFD, Aroclor, and their interaction.

A. Ontologies affected by a HFD, B. Aroclor exposure, and C. interaction. Phospho-peptides that were significant by two way ANOVA were used for this analysis and only pathways that met the FDR of 0.05 were used. HFD affected Pathways, Processes, and Pathologies Aroclor affected Pathways, Processes, and Pathologies Interaction affected Pathways, Processes, and Pathologies

A HFD affected, Pathways, Processers, and Pathologies
Pathway, Process, or Pathology p-value FDR
Liver-lipid accumulation, microvesicular 2.98E-05 6.86E-03
SCAP/SREBP Transcriptional Control of Cholesterol and FA Biosynthesis 1.12E-04 2.67E-02
Signal transduction_Amino acid-dependent mTORC1 activation 1.75E-04 2.67E-02
HSP70 and HSP40-dependent folding in Huntington’s disease 3.31 E-04 2.74E-02
Butanoate metabolism 3.60E-04 2.74E-02
Adiponectin in pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes 5.17E-04 3.16E-02
Transport_Low density lipoproteins assembly and remodeling 8.31 E-04 4.22E-02
B Aroclor affected Pathways, Processes, and Pathologies
Pathway, Process, or Pathology p-value FDR
SCAP/SREBP Transcriptional Control of Cholesterol and FA Biosynthesis 4.88E-05 5.24E-03
Development_Leptin signaling via P13K-dependent pathway 5.32E-05 5.24E-03
Butanoate metabolism 1.58E-04 1.04E-02
Insulin-dependent stimulation of SREBP-1 in type 2 diabetes in liver 2.49E-04 1.23E-02
DNA damage_DBS repair 4.38E-04 2.63E-02
Regulation of lipid metabolism_Regulation of lipid metabolism via LXR, NF-Y and SREBP 6.22E-04 2.45E-02
Regulation of metabolism_Bile acids regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism via FXR 7.78E-04 2.56E-02
Transcription_Epigenetic regulation of gene expression 2.03E-03 5.0E-02
Propionate metabolism p.2 2.71 E-03 5.0E-02
Regulation of lipid metabolism_Regulation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 activity 2.82E-03 5.0E-02
Transport_RAN regulation pathway 2.82E-03 5.0E-02
Transcription_Sirtuin6 regulation and functions 2.83E-03 5.0E-02
C Interaction affected Pathways, Processes, and Pathologies
Pathway, Process, or Pathology p-value FDR
Liver-necrosis 2.85E-07 1.42E-04
Liver pathology 1.32E-05 3.30E-03
Possible regulation of HSF-1/ chaperone pathway in Huntington’s disease 1.52E-04 2.57E-02
Huntingtin-depended transcription deregulation in Huntington’s Disease 2.29E-04 2.57E-02

PhosphoScanSite 3 analysis of the significant phosphopeptides demonstrate that many kinases are downregulated with Aroclor exposure and the Aroclor and HFD interaction.

Using the significant p-substrates and the direction that their abundance was altered due to experimental variables, a kinome analysis was conducted. Fig 1A demonstrates that some kinases were predicted to have higher activity, while others were lower with a HFD. Fig 1B shows that an overwhelming majority of kinases are predicted to have lower activity with Aroclor exposure. These downregulated kinases include ERK, AKT, CK2, and CDKs. Fig 1C demonstrates that the kinome was downregulated to an even greater extent by the interaction of a HFD and Aroclor exposure. ERK, AKT, CK2, and CDKs were downregulated due to interaction of a HFD and Aroclor exposure as well. This implicates loss of phosphoprotein signalling in the pathogenesis of TASH..

Figure 1: Phosphoproteomic analysis identifies phosphorylated substrates altered by Aroclor 1260 exposure, a HFD, and their interaction.

Figure 1:

A.Phosphoproteomic workflow is illustrated. B-D. Volcano plots of significant p-peptides fold-change vs. -log(p-value) for HFD (HFD/CD fold-change), Aroclor (CD+/CD fold- change), and their interaction (H+/CD fold-change). B. A HFD enriched 113 p-peptides and diminished 104 p-peptides. C. Aroclor 1260 exposure enriched 46 p-peptides and diminished 131. D. The interaction of the two variables enriched 9 p-peptides and diminished 185. Phospho-peptide abundances were compared by two-way ANOVA and only peptides that were significantly changed (P<0.05) were investigated further.

PP2α and PTP1b were not significantly upregulated with Aroclor exposure suggesting the cumulative loss of phosphoproteins is due to loss of signal rather than degradation.

Since the levels of protein phosphorylation are dramatically downregulated with PCB exposure and with dietary interaction, the expression of phosphatases was assessed. Fig 3A-B demonstrate that Ser/Thr phosphatase PP2a and Tyr phosphatase PTP1B were not significantly changed with PCB exposure or diet. This suggests that the loss of phosphoproteins and kinase activity cannot be explained by increased phosphatase levels, but loss of activation through phosphorylation.

Figure 3: PP2A and PTP1b were not significantly upregulated with Aroclor exposure suggesting the cumulative loss phosphoprotein signalling is due loss of signal and not enhanced degradation.

Figure 3:

A. Immunoblot analysis of hepatic PP2α and B. PTP1B. The following abbreviations in the graphs represent the subsequent groups;control diet (CD), control diet with Aroclor 1260 exposure (CD+), high fat diet (HFD), high fat diet with Aroclor exposure (HFD+). A n=5 was used for the immunoblot analysis. A two-way ANOVA was used to statistically compare these datasets.

Aroclor exposure diminishes CK2 activity and reduces expression of the α and β subunits but increases the expression of the α’ subunit.

Since CK2 was projected to have decreased kinase activity after Aroclor exposure, CK2 activity and the pattern of expression of its subunits were measured. CK2 can function as a tetramer and is thought to be constitutively active. Fig 2A-D demonstrates that Aroclor exposure diminishes the protein expression of CK2α 97% (p<0.01), and CK2β 67% (p<0.01), and CK2 kinase activity 81% (p<0.002) (CD vs CD+) but increases the expression of CK2α” (p<0.0006). The expression of CK2α” is most pronounced in the livers of mice that developed TASH (HFD+). CK2 can function as a tetrameric enzyme with either 2 alpha subunits and 2 beta subunits or 2 alpha’ subunits and two beta subunits. Interestingly PCB exposure promotes CK2 alpha’ subunit expression which is more pronounced with a HFD and PCB exposure.

Aroclor exposure prevents CASP3 phosphorylation and promotes secondary necrosis in vitro.

CK2 negatively regulates cell death through phosphorylation of caspases at residues surrounding their cleavage sites, thereby, preventing caspase- mediated cell death. Since TASH is distinguished by elevated hepatic cell death and there is a loss of CK2 activity with PCB exposure, caspase-3 (CASP3) phosphorylation and cell death were measured. In Fig 3A CASP3 expression is actually reduced 59% (p<0.0003) with PCB exposure or a HFD 63% (p<0.0001) and its decline is more pronounced with the co-exposure (31%) (p<0.0016) relative to CD expression. Fig 3B demonstrates that phosphorylation of CASP3 at S150 is downregulated with Aroclor exposure (52%) (p<0.006), HFD (49%)(p<0.02), and their interaction (40%)(p<0.0005). Fig 3C illustrates that primary human hepatocytes exposed to PCBs first undergo apoptosis 33.3% of cells at 6 hours and 41.7% at 24 hours are apoptotic, followed by 4.2% of cells undergoing secondary necrosis at 6 hours, and 41.7% at 24 hours (Fig 3D).

DISCUSSION:

PCBs were previously characterized as EGFR antagonists in vivo and in vitro and coined “signalling disrupting chemicals” providing a rationale to investigate the hepatic phosphoproteome in an animal model of PCB-mediated TASH [1]. Cell signalling through protein phosphorylation via kinases is critical for cells to respond to intracellular and extracellular cues rapidly. We postulate that downregulation of phosphoproteomic signalling by PCBs could sensitize the liver to HFD-induced steatohepatitis. The most well characterized example of loss of hepatic signalling in metabolic disease is insulin resistance [14]. While the insulin receptor is one of the most well studied receptor tyrosine kinases in metabolism, the EGFR is highly expressed in the liver and is understudied in the context of NAFLD. However, not all of the kinome affected were downstream of EGFR. The manner by which PCBs decrease activity of other kinases is unknown. Previously however, loss in the phosphorylation of several of these kinases (e.g. EGFR, AKT, ERK, mTOR) has already been validated via western blot analysis [1, 11]. However, while the inhibition of EGFR by PCBs was the rationale to perform these analysis the results demonstrate that loss of EGFR signalling is only part of the story.

Interestingly, a majority of the hepatic phosphopeptides were significantly decreased with Aroclor exposure and the PCB-dietary interaction. Roughly, a quarter of the phosphopeptides were diminished in the livers of mice that developed TASH suggesting loss of cell signalling could contribute to the development of TASH. When analyzing the kinome alterations due to the experiment variables, Aroclor exposure suppressed kinase activity and the Aroclor-HFD interaction exacerbated this effect. Since protein phosphorylation can be regulated by kinases and phosphatases [22], the abundance of serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphatases were determined. The decrease in phosphoproteins was not due to upregulation of either PP2α, or PTP1B. This suggests that the observed effect was due to decreased signal rather than elevated signal degradation.

Recently, PCB-126 has been shown to inhibit activation of hepatic AMPK pathway similar to our findings [23]. In addition, PCB-126 can promote liver disease in in vivo [24] and was demonstrated to be the most potent EGFR inhibitor (of the PCB congeners) tested in vitro [1]. PCB-153 worsened steatosis in vivo [25], and was a potent EGFR inhibitor in vitro as well, but less so than PCB-126. Aroclor 1254, a lower chlorinated PCB mixture, can prevent glucose metabolism in vivo through disruption of insulin receptor signaling [26]. These serve as examples of hepatic signalling disruption due to varied PCB congeners and mixtures. This study proposes that signalling disruption is a critical biological effect of PCB exposures that can contribute to TASH. More studies are required in the future to investigate multiple PCB congeners and mixture effects on hepatic signaling in vivo, as this is a field in its infancy.

The MetaCore analysis demonstrated that a HFD affects hepatic lipid accumulation that is well established in many HFD fed animal models [27, 28]. The interaction of a HFD and PCB exposure highlighted liver necrosis pathology which reinforces previous findings [25, 29, 30]. Aroclor was found to affect pathways involving PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase), insulin and LXR (Liver X receptor) that has previously been demonstrated with PCB exposures in the liver [1, 6, 11]. These animals were in the fasted state where hepatic EGFR regulates PI3K activity [31]. Thus, the pathway analysis highlighting insulin and leptin signalling (fed state receptors) as pathways affected by Aroclor exposure was interesting as these receptors all overlap in their regulation of PI3K [32]. Previously elevated PCB body burden in humans was directly correlated to decreases in serum leptin and insulin [6]. This may in part explain the pathway analysis and further contribute to understanding how PCBs disrupt cell signalling through limiting the abundance of metabolic receptor ligands. In addition to insulin and leptin signalling affected by PCB exposure MetaCore analysis identified other ontologies affected by PCB exposure. For example, Aroclor 1260 impacted nuclear receptors (FXR, LXR), sirtuin protein regulation, SCFA metabolism, and acetyl CoA carboxylase (ACC). Each of these pathways have pathologic implications in the sensitization to diet induced fatty liver disease. For instance FXR agonists and ACC inhibitors are in development for the treatment of NASH[33].

The Endocrine Society defines endocrine disruptors as chemicals that interfere with any aspect of hormone action [2, 34]. Thus, this present manuscript clarifies mechanisms of PCB-related endocrine disruption. Two known factors account for the decrease in signal. First, PCBs have been shown to inhibit at least one RTK, namely the EGFR [1, 11]. Due to homology with other conserved receptor structure, it is possible that PCBs could also inhibit related receptors [35]. Secondly, PCBs are endocrine disruptors which have been shown to decrease circulating hormone levels [6]. For example, PCB exposures were associated with reduced insulin and leptin levels in both animal and human studies (ACHS) [6, 15]. This is consistent with decreased insulin and leptin action detected by MetaCore ontologies in this study. Thus, PCBs can decrease protein hormone levels as well as protein hormone receptor function eliciting a cell signaling deficit. Mechanisms of cell death are most highly associated with the inhibition of cell signalling (e.g. kinase inhibitors). Kinase inhibition dependent cell death has been well studied in the cancer field but in contrast the effects on liver function are understudied [36].

One kinase not previously demonstrated to be downregulated by PCBs in the development of TASH was CK2. CK2 has been shown to negatively regulate cell death through phosphorylation of residues surrounding caspase cleavage sites, thereby, preventing cleavage [37]. CK2 is unique, in that it is made up of subunits and is considered constitutively active [38, 39]. CK2 is thought to be constitutively active in order to prevent incidental caspase-mediated apoptosis through caspase phosphorylation by CK2 [39, 40]. However, little is known in regard to the subunit configuration on kinase activity [38, 39]. The data suggested that hepatic CK2 activity is decreased with Aroclor exposure. Our validation experiment confirmed this initial observation and demonstrated that the subunit composition is altered with PCB exposure, resulting in an inhibitory effect on kinase activity. Interestingly with PCB exposure, the CK2a’ subunit was more highly expressed, and this was further increased in mice that were exposed and fed a HFD, clearly demonstrating an interaction unique to TASH. CK2α’ is a key effector kinase in interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha signalling in inflammation which may explain the elevated expression with PCB exposure [41]. Previously cytokine elevation was associated with PCB exposures TASH animal models [15, 30] and human studies (ACHS) [6]. Also CK2β is downregulated with Aroclor exposure, as well, which has been shown to be required for the tetrameric formation [38]. CK2 is the main regulator CASP3 phosphorylation that negatively regulates apoptosis through prevention of CASP3 self-cleavage and activation [37, 40, 42].

CASP3 is a measure of apoptotic cell death that can be due to intrinsic or extrinsic activation [37, 42]. Apoptosis is a programmed form of cell death that is often considered non-inflammatory, as opposed to necrosis [43]. Recent data demonstrates that in liver disease models, apoptosis is the initial cell death mechanism observed, but once immune cell-mediated apoptotic cell clearance is saturated (or no immune cells are present as seen in in vitro models), secondary necrosis occurs [44]. Our data supports this model as CASP3 expression is decreased relative to control with either PCB exposure or a HFD suggesting it is undergoing post-apoptotic degradation. This is further exacerbated in the livers of mice fed a HFD and exposed to PCBs. In primary human hepatocytes exposed to Aroclor 1260, cell apoptosis is first observed at 6 hours, followed by a rise in necrotic death at 24 hours. Since this a rapid PCB effect it would present as necrosis in vivo. These findings suggest that PCB exposure promotes apoptosis followed by secondary necrosis. This adds support to human studies where elevated whole CK-18 (necrosis marker) in serum is associated with PCB load in exposed populations[6].

CONCLUSION

This is the first phosphoproteomic analysis of an animal model of TASH. Collectively, the data suggest that loss of protein phosphorylation (25% loss of phospho-peptides in TASH) and down-regulation of the hepatic kinome is a major factor in the development of PCB-mediated TASH (Graphical Abstract). This study confirms past studies where PCBs downregulated hepatic AKT, ERK, and mTOR activity [1, 11]. CK2 is an additional kinase that is downregulated in TASH, due to PCB-mediated loss of CK2α and CK2β subunit expression. PCB-mediated loss of CK2 activity prevents negative phospho-regulation of CASP3. Secondary necrosis appears to be the final mechanism of cell death in PCB-mediated TASH in vivo and in vitro. Additional human model system investigation of PCB-mediated signalling disruption and NAFLD are required for the future.

Figure 4: Aroclor exposure diminishes CK2 activity and reduces expression of the α and β subunits but increases the expression of the α ‘ subunit.

Figure 4:

A. Immunoblot analysis of CK2α, B. CK2α’, C. CK2β expression, and D. CK2 phospho-substrate. E. Illustration of alterations in CK2 subunit expression relative to CD expression. A n=5 was used for the immunoblot analysis. The following abbreviations in the graphs represent the subsequent groups;control diet (CD), control diet with Aroclor 1260 exposure (CD+), high fat diet (HFD), high fat diet with Aroclor exposure (HFD+). A two way ANOVA was used to statistically compare these datasets.

Figure 5: Aroclor exposure promotes secondary necrosis in TASH.

Figure 5:

A. Immunoblot analysis of hepatic CASP3, B. S150 CASP3. C. Cellomic cell death measure in cryopreserved human hepatocytes at 6 and 24 hours. The following abbreviations in the graphs represent the subsequent groups;control diet (CD), control diet with Aroclor 1260 exposure (CD+), high fat diet (HFD), high fat diet with Aroclor exposure (HFD+).A n=5 was used for the immunoblot analysis. A n=24 was for the Cellomic assay, each plotted point is a mean ± SEM for 2500 cells. A two-way ANOVA was used to statistically compare the western blot analysis data.

Highlights:

  • PCBs are signalling disrupting chemicals that downregulate 25% of the hepatic phospho-proteome in steatohepatitis

  • PCBs prevent Casein Kinase 2 negative regulation of Caspase 3

  • PCBs promote secondary necrosis

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:

Grant Support:

Supported in part by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [1R01ES021375, F31ES028982, R35ES028373, P42ES023716], The National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P20GM113226], The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [P50AA024337, R01AA023190, P20GM113226]

Abbreviations:

AKT

Serine/Threonine kinase 1

CAR

Constitutive androstane receptor

CASP3

Caspase-3

CD

Control diet

CD+

Control diet + Aroclor 1260 exposure

CDK

Cyclin dependent kinase

CK2

Casein kinase 2

CK-18

Cytokeratin - 18

EGFR

Epidermal growth factor receptor

EDCs

Endocrine disrupting chemicals

ERK

Extracellular regulated kinase

FASP

Filter aided sample prep

FDR

False discovery rate

FXR

Farnesoid X receptor

GAPDH

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

HFD

High fat diet

HFD+

high fat diet + Aroclor 1260 exposure

HNF4a

Hepatocyte nuclear factor receptor alpha

LXR

Liver X receptor

MDCs

Metabolic disrupting chemicals

NAFLD

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

NHANES

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

NRF2

Nuclear factor (erythroid- derived 2)-like 2

PCBs

Polychlorinated biphenyls

PI3K

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase

PP2a

Serine/Threonine protein phosphatase 2a

PTP1B

Protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B

SDCs

Signalling disrupting chemicals

TASH

Toxicant associated steatohepatitis

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES:

  • [1].Hardesty JE, Al-Eryani L, Wahlang B, Falkner KC, Shi H, Jin J, Vivace B, Ceresa BP, Prough RA, Cave MC, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Disruption by Endocrine and Metabolic Disrupting Chemicals, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Heindel JJ, Newbold R, Schug TT, Endocrine disruptors and obesity, Nature reviews. Endocrinology 11(11) (2015) 653–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Schecter A, Colacino J, Haffner D, Patel K, Opel M, Papke O, Birnbaum L, Perfluorinated compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, and organochlorine pesticide contamination in composite food samples from Dallas, Texas, USA, Environ Health Perspect 118(6) (2010) 796–802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M, Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes, Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 64(1) (2016) 73–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Cave M, Appana S, Patel M, Falkner KC, McClain CJ, Brock G, Polychlorinated biphenyls, lead, and mercury are associated with liver disease in American adults: NHANES 2003–2004, Environ Health Perspect 118(12) (2010) 1735–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Clair HB, Pinkston CM, Rai SN, Pavuk M, Dutton ND, Brock G, Prough RA, Falkner KC, McClain CJ, Cave MC, Liver Disease in a Residential Cohort with Elevated Polychlorinated Biphenyl Exposures, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Kiyosawa N, Kwekel JC, Burgoon LD, Dere E, Williams KJ, Tashiro C, Chittim B, Zacharewski TR, Species-specific regulation of PXR/CAR/ER-target genes in the mouse and rat liver elicited by o, p’-DDT, BMC genomics 9 (2008) 487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Oshida K, Vasani N, Jones C, Moore T, Hester S, Nesnow S, Auerbach S, Geter DR, Aleksunes LM, Thomas RS, Applegate D, Klaassen CD, Corton JC, Identification of chemical modulators of the constitutive activated receptor (CAR) in a gene expression compendium, Nuclear receptor signaling 13 (2015) e002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Sakai H, Iwata H, Kim EY, Tsydenova O, Miyazaki N, Petrov EA, Batoev VB, Tanabe S, Constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) as a potential sensing biomarker of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in aquatic mammal: molecular characterization, expression level, and ligand profiling in Baikal seal (Pusa sibirica), Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology 94(1) (2006) 57–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Wei P, Zhang J, Dowhan DH, Han Y, Moore DD, Specific and overlapping functions of the nuclear hormone receptors CAR and PXR in xenobiotic response, The pharmacogenomics journal 2(2) (2002) 117–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Hardesty JE, Wahlang B, Falkner KC, Clair HB, Clark BJ, Ceresa BP, Prough RA, Cave MC, Polychlorinated Biphenyls Disrupt Hepatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling, Xenobiotica;the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems (2016) 1–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Avraham R, Yarden Y, Feedback regulation of EGFR signalling: decision making by early and delayed loops, Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology 12(2) (2011) 104–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Mutoh S, Sobhany M, Moore R, Perera L, Pedersen L, Sueyoshi T, Negishi M, Phenobarbital indirectly activates the constitutive active androstane receptor (CAR) by inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling, Science signaling 6(274) (2013) ra31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus, Diabetes Care 32 Suppl 1 (2009) S62–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Wahlang B, Song M, Beier JI, Cameron Falkner K, Al-Eryani L, Clair HB, Prough RA, Osborne TS, Malarkey DE, Christopher States J, Cave MC, Evaluation of Aroclor 1260 exposure in a mouse model of diet-induced obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 279(3) (2014) 380–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M, Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis, Nature methods 6(5) (2009) 359–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Murray RD, Merchant ML, Hardin E, Clark B, Khundmiri SJ, Lederer ED, Identification of an RNA-binding protein that is phosphorylated by PTH and potentially mediates PTH-induced destabilization of Npt2a mRNA, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology 310(3) (2016) C205–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Obenauer JC, Cantley LC, Yaffe MB, Scansite 2.0: Proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs, Nucleic acids research 31(13) (2003) 3635–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Sumida K, Igarashi Y, Toritsuka N, Matsushita T, Abe-Tomizawa K, Aoki M, Urushidani T, Yamada H, Ohno Y, Effects of DMSO on gene expression in human and rat hepatocytes, Human & experimental toxicology 30(10) (2011) 1701–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Zhivotosky B, Orrenius S, Assessment of apoptosis and necrosis by DNA fragmentation and morphological criteria, Current protocols in cell biology Chapter 18 (2001) Unit 18.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Kao LS, Green CE, Analysis of variance: is there a difference in means and what does it mean?, The Journal of surgical research 144(1) (2008) 158–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Humphrey SJ, James DE, Mann M, Protein Phosphorylation: A Major Switch Mechanism for Metabolic Regulation, Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM 26(12) (2015) 676–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Gadupudi GS, Elser BA, Sandgruber FA, Li X, Gibson-Corley KN, Robertson LW, PCB126 Inhibits the Activation of AMPK-CREB Signal Transduction Required for Energy Sensing in Liver, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology 163(2) (2018) 440–453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Wahlang B, Perkins JT, Petriello MC, Hoffman JB, Stromberg AJ, Hennig B, A compromised liver alters polychlorinated biphenyl-mediated toxicity, Toxicology 380 (2017) 11–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Wahlang B, Falkner KC, Gregory B, Ansert D, Young D, Conklin DJ, Bhatnagar A, McClain CJ, Cave M, Polychlorinated biphenyl 153 is a diet-dependent obesogen that worsens nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in male C57BL6/J mice, The Journal of nutritional biochemistry 24(9) (2013) 1587–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Zhang S, Wu T, Chen M, Guo Z, Yang Z, Zuo Z, Wang C, Chronic Exposure to Aroclor 1254 Disrupts Glucose Homeostasis in Male Mice via Inhibition of the Insulin Receptor Signal Pathway, Environmental science & technology 49(16) (2015) 10084–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Angrish MM, Kaiser JP, McQueen CA, Chorley BN, Tipping the Balance: Hepatotoxicity and the 4 Apical Key Events of Hepatic Steatosis, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology 150(2) (2016) 261–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Lockman KA, Htun V, Sinha R, Treskes P, Nelson LJ, Martin SF, Rogers SM, Le Bihan T, Hayes PC, Plevris JN, Proteomic profiling of cellular steatosis with concomitant oxidative stress in vitro, Lipids in health and disease 15 (2016) 114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Wahlang B, Falkner KC, Clair HB, Al-Eryani L, Prough RA, States JC, Coslo DM, Omiecinski CJ, Cave MC, Human receptor activation by aroclor 1260, a polychlorinated biphenyl mixture, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology 140(2) (2014) 283–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Wahlang B, Prough RA, Falkner KC, Hardesty JE, Song M, Clair HB, Clark BJ, States JC, Arteel GE, Cave MC, Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Xenobiotic Nuclear Receptor Interactions Regulate Energy Metabolism, Behavior, and Inflammation in Non-alcoholic- Steatohepatitis, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology 149(2) (2016) 396–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Robles MS, Humphrey SJ, Mann M, Phosphorylation Is a Central Mechanism for Circadian Control of Metabolism and Physiology, Cell metabolism 25(1) (2017) 118–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Wang Y, Kuropatwinski KK, White DW, Hawley TS, Hawley RG, Tartaglia LA, Baumann H, Leptin receptor action in hepatic cells, The Journal of biological chemistry 272(26) (1997) 16216–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Friedman SL, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Rinella M, Sanyal AJ, Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies, Nature medicine 24(7) (2018) 908–922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Heindel JJ, Blumberg B, Cave M, Machtinger R, Mantovani A, Mendez MA, Nadal A, Palanza P, Panzica G, Sargis R, Vandenberg LN, Vom Saal F, Metabolism disrupting chemicals and metabolic disorders, Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) 68 (2017) 3–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Volinsky N, Kholodenko BN, Complexity of receptor tyrosine kinase signal processing, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 5(8) (2013) a009043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Zhang J, Yang PL, Gray NS, Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors, Nature reviews. Cancer 9(1) (2009) 28–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Kurokawa M, Kornbluth S, Caspases and kinases in a death grip, Cell 138(5) (2009) 838–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Graham KC, Litchfield DW, The regulatory beta subunit of protein kinase CK2 mediates formation of tetrameric CK2 complexes, The Journal of biological chemistry 275(7) (2000) 5003–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Sarno S, Ghisellini P, Pinna LA, Unique activation mechanism of protein kinase CK2. The N-terminal segment is essential for constitutive activity of the catalytic subunit but not of the holoenzyme, The Journal of biological chemistry 277(25) (2002) 22509–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Turowec JP, Vilk G, Gabriel M, Litchfield DW, Characterizing the convergence of protein kinase CK2 and caspase-3 reveals isoform-specific phosphorylation of caspase-3 by CK2alpha’: implications for pathological roles of CK2 in promoting cancer cell survival, Oncotarget 4(4) (2013) 560–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Nomoto K, Nishida T, Nakanishi Y, Fujimoto M, Takasaki I, Tabuchi Y, Tsuneyama K, Deficiency in galectin-3 promotes hepatic injury in CDAA diet-induced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, TheScientificWorldJournal 2012 (2012) 959824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Wilson CH, Kumar S, Caspases in metabolic disease and their therapeutic potential, Cell death and differentiation 25(6) (2018) 1010–1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Strzyz P, Cell death: Pulling the apoptotic trigger for necrosis, Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology 18(2) (2017) 72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Silva MT, Secondary necrosis: the natural outcome of the complete apoptotic program, FEBS letters 584(22) (2010) 4491–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES