Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J AAPOS. 2018 Oct 12;22(6):438–440. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2018.07.348

Adult-onset nonparalytic, small-angle hypertropia

Saumya M Shah a, Jennifer M Martinez-Thompson b, Nancy N Diehl c, Brian G Mohney d
PMCID: PMC6289848  NIHMSID: NIHMS1509570  PMID: 30321668

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the prevalence and clinical features of a common but underrecognized disorder of adult vertical strabismus.

Methods

The medical records of all adult (>19 years of age) residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, diagnosed with nonparalytic, small-angle hypertropia (NPSAH) from January 1, 1985, through December 31, 2004, were retrospectively reviewed for demographic and clinical features.

Results

Of 753 patients diagnosed with adult-onset strabismus, 99 (13.1%) were found to have NPSAH, yielding an annual incidence of 7.50 per 100,000 patients >18 years of age and a cumulative incidence of 1.28%. Diplopia was reported at the initial diagnosis in 91 patients (93.8%), with 90 (92.8%) having the diplopia in primary or reading position. The median initial angle of hypertropia was 2 (range, 1–22) at near and 2 (range, 0–12) at distance. After a median follow-up of 10.8 years (range, 6.2 months to 23.7 years), the final median angle of vertical deviation was 4 (range, 0–20) at near and 4 (range, 0–16) at distance for all 99 patients.

Conclusions

NPSAH is a relatively common but infrequently recognized disorder among adults. More prevalent among elderly and female patients in this study cohort, the vast majority presented with diplopia and a hypertropia of <10 that progressed over time.


Adult strabismus is a relatively common disorder.1,2 Although the demographics and clinical characteristics of childhood strabismus have been well-described,37 less is known concerning adult-onset strabismus. Existing studies of ocular misalignment among adults are primarily retrospective reports of patients who have undergone surgery and do not include medically managed cases or the more rare or unusual forms of strabismus.2,811 Only recently have reports1,12 provided a more accurate representation of the various forms of adult strabismus. Although paralytic strabismus has been shown to be the most prevalent form among adults, we recently reported that nonparalytic, small-angle hypertropia comprised 13.1% of all forms of adult-onset strabismus in a population-based cohort.12 The purpose of the current study was to describe the clinical characteristics and early natural history of adults diagnosed with this form of hypertropia over a 20-year period.

Subjects and Methods

This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic and Olmsted Medical Group Institutional Review Board. The medical records of all patients at least 19 years of age who were newly diagnosed with a nonparalytic, small-angle hypertropia from January 1, 1985, through December 31, 2004, while residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota, were retrospectively reviewed. Cases of adult hypertropia were identified using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) database, a medical record linkage system that combines all patient-physician encounters in Olmsted County, Minnesota.13 Due to the relatively isolated nature of this county from other metropolitan areas, the Mayo Clinic and Olmsted Medical Group and their affiliated hospitals are responsible for providing virtually all of the medical care to its residents.

Potential cases of new-onset adult strabismus were verified by searching the REP database for International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, codes for strabismus and other disorders of binocular eye movements. The various forms of adult strabismus observed in this population have previously been reported.12 Nonparalytic, small-angle hypertropia was defined in this study as either a comitant hypertropia or vertical diplopia in patients who had no signs of trochlear nerve palsy and were managed using prisms of ≥3. The medical records of all patients were reviewed carefully for oblique muscle dysfunction and any description of fundus torsion to specifically exclude a small- or long-standing trochlear nerve palsy. Other forms of vertical strabismus, including those associated with myasthenia gravis, thyroid eye disease, childhood onset, or due to a neurologic or sensory etiology, were also excluded from the study. Ocular alignment was measured by a number of methods, including Maddox rod, alternate prism and cover test, and Lancaster red-green test. Patients also routinely underwent a measurement of visual acuity, ocular rotations, and assessment of the anterior and posterior segments.

The incidence rate of adult-onset nonparalytic, small-angle hypertropia was estimated using the age- and gender-specific population figures for Olmsted County, Minnesota, census data for 1985 through 2004. The 95% confidence interval for the incidence rate was calculated assuming a Poisson error distribution. The rate of progression of hypertropia was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All of the statistical tests performed were two-sided and an α of 0.05 was set as the threshold of significance.

Results

Nonparalytic, small-angle hypertropia was diagnosed in 99 (13.1%) of the 753 strabismic adults over the 20-year period, yielding an annual age- and gender-adjusted incidence of 7.50 (95% CI, 6.01–8.99) per 100,000 residents >19 years of age, and a cumulative incidence of 1.28 per 100 for the adults included in this study. The median age at diagnosis was 71 years (range, 27–98 years), with a significant increase in incidence with increasing age (P < 0.05). There were 63 (64%) women in the study population.

The presenting ophthalmic findings of the 99 patients are shown in Table 1. Of 97 queried patients, 91 (94%) were found to have diplopia on their initial examination: 77 (79%) in primary gaze, 13 (13%) in reading gaze, and 1 (1%) in peripheral or side gaze. The median angle of hypertropia at vertical distance fixation was 2 at near (range, 1–22) and 2 (range, 0–12) at distance. Only 3 patients had an initial vertical deviation of at least 11. Fifty-one patients (51%) also had a mean horizontal phoria of 5.4 (range, 2–15). Torticollis was present in 4 patients (4%), and the mean stereoacuity was 40 arcsec (range, 0–400 arcsec). The most prevalent associated systemic condition was hypertension, in approximately one-third of patients.

Table 1.

Presenting ophthalmic features of 99 patients with nonparalytic hypertropia

      Characteristic Result
Median age at diagnosis, years (range) 71 (27–98)
Sex, no. (%)
 Male 63 (63.6)
 Female 36 (36.4)
Patients with diplopia, no. (%)
 Primary gaze 77 (79.4)
 Reading gaze 13 (13.4)
 Peripheral gaze 1 (1.0)
Median vertical alignment at diagnosis, PD
 Near (range) [N = 92] 2 (1–22)
 Distance (range) [N = 82] 2 (0–12)
Type of deviation at diagnosis, no. (%)
 Right hypertropia 51 (51.5)
 Left hypertropia 48 (48.5)
Patients with reported systemic conditions, no. (%)
 Hypertension 35 (35.4)
 Diabetes 3 (3.0)
 Cerebrovascular disease 4 (4.0)

PD, prism diopter.

The 99 patients were followed for a median of 10.8 years (range, 6.2 months to 23.7 years), with only 1 patient having follow-up of <1 year. Eighty-four patients (84.8%) received prisms in their spectacles at some time during the follow-up period, and 1 patient underwent surgery for correction of a vertical deviation of 3. The final median angle of hypertropia at vertical distance fixation for the 99 patients was 4 (range, 0–20) at near and 4 (range, 0–16) at distance, a mean increase of 2 from the initial evaluation.

Discussion

Nonparalytic, small-angle hypertropia (NPSAH) comprised 13.1% of patients in this population-based cohort of adult-onset strabismus. The mean age at diagnosis occurred in the seventh decade of life, and two-thirds of the cohort were female. Most patients were diplopic, with a small angle of deviation that showed a progressive increase over time. The use of prisms in spectacles was the most common form of therapy in this cohort of patients.14

There are few published studies with which to compare the findings of this report. The relatively common occurrence of the specific form of hypertropia observed in this cohort has not been previously reported. Prior studies of adult strabismus are comprised almost exclusively of postoperative outcomes, with most studies having no patients with hypertropia.2,911 In a systematic review of Medicare patients diagnosed with strabismus, Repka and colleagues1 observed that 19% had some form of hypertropia. Similarly, El-Sahn and colleagues15 reported the prevalence of vertical deviation alone to be 18.9% in a cohort of strabismic patients >60 years of age. However, neither of these reports provide clinical characteristics or distinguish NPSAH from other forms of hypertropia. Several studies1619 describing the evaluation of certain forms of adult-onset strabismus include vertical strabismus, but without extensive clinical description. A recent study on the etiology of hypertropia in 300 adults reported that none had NPSAH20; however, 9 of the study patients (3%) were diagnosed with decompensated hypertropia. Although difficult to make this diagnosis without observing decompensation, it is possible that some or all of these patients had NPSAH. Regardless, their observed decompensated hypertropia prevalence of 3% among all forms of adult hypertropias is significantly lower than the 13.1% prevalence of NPSAH diagnosed among all forms of new-onset adult strabismus in the present study.12

Although nonparalytic hypertropia occurs relatively commonly in elderly adults, it appears to be underrecognized and often overlooked. Because the deviation is initially small or intermittent and readily controlled, patients may not seek care immediately or may be unable to properly express their symptoms. When finally examined by an eye care professional, generally a nonstrabismus specialist, the patient may report having diplopia or, often, difficulty seeing. The unfamiliar examiner may not perform an alternate cover or similar test, further postponing the diagnosis. Frustrations and concerns about symptoms may persist until the patient is appropriately evaluated and diagnosed. The small angle of deviation and the delayed or unrecognized diagnosis are likely to have contributed to its absence in the scientific literature. An increased awareness and earlier identification of this form of adult strabismus would enhance patient satisfaction and outcomes.

Several theories have been proposed for the occurrence of nonparalytic hyperdeviations during adulthood. Chaudhari and Demer19 suggested that such a deviation may be a result of “sagging eye syndrome,” which is characterized by t he asymmetric stretching of the lateral rectus–superior rectus band ligament and leads to i nferior sag of the lateral rectus pulley, thus causing the acquired diplopia reported in their study’s hypertropic and esotropic patients. 19 This uneven stretching and sag can be explained by aging-related degeneration of the orbital connective tissue.18 Others have proposed that some cases of adult hypertropia may be due to comitant skew deviations as a result of microvascular ischemia–related lesions in the cerebellum, brainstem, or the vestibular system.21 A third explanation for at least some of these patients is retinal diplopia in which epiretinal membrane wrinkling leads to displacement of one macula relative to the other, resulting in diplopia.22 The wrinkling appears to be due to traction at the vitreoretinal interface, caused by disorders such as ocular histoplasmosis, macular degeneration, and diabetic retinopathy. Among the various causes for epiretinal membrane–related diplopia (ie, retinal misregistration, refractive error, or strabismus), those with strabismic retinal diplopia may be identified by testing negative on the tests for retinal misregistration, or experiencing a resolution of diplopia with the use of prisms or surgery, similar to the patients in this study.23 All three entities occur almost exclusively in older individuals, consistent with the observation that nonparalytic hypertropia increases in incidence with increasing age.12

There are a number of limitations to the findings of this study. Given the relatively small deviations and seemingly unrecognized nature of this form of strabismus, it is likely that the prevalence is underestimated in the study population. Moreover, some private optometrists working in Olmsted County are not involved in the REP database. Although many cases assessed by local optometrists are referred to one of the two medical institutions associated with the REP for higher-level care, the symptoms of some adults may not have been severe enough to seek such care. This study is also limited by the frequent use of the Maddox rod to assess ocular alignment. Although the Maddox Rod is inferior to the alternate cover and prism test for assessing strabismus, most patients were examined on multiple visits for their symptoms of vertical diplopia. Finally, given the limited racial and ethnic composition of Olmsted County, our results are best extrapolated to the small, urban, white populations of the United States.

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible in part by the Rochester Epidemiology Project (Grant # R01-AG034676 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases) and by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness Inc, New York, NY.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Repka MX, Yu F, Coleman A. Strabismus among aged fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries. J AAPOS 2012;16:495–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Scott WE, Kutschke PJ, Lee WR. 20th annual Frank Costenbader Lecture--adult strabismus. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1995;32:348–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Friedman Z, Neumann E, Hyams SW, Peleg B. Ophthalmic screening of 38,000 children, age 1 to 2 1/2 years, in child welfare clinics. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1980;17:261–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Govindan M, Mohney BG, Diehl NN, Burke JP. Incidence and types of childhood exotropia population-based study. Ophthalmology 2005;112:104–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tollefson MM, Mohney BG, Diehl NN, Burke JP. Incidence and types of childhood hypertropia: a population-based study. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1142–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Greenberg AE, Mohney BG, Diehl NN, Burke JP. Incidence and types of childhood esotropia. Ophthalmology 2007;114:170–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Torp-Pedersen T, Boyd HA, Skotte L, et al. Strabismus incidence in a Danish population-based cohort of children. JAMA Ophthalmol 2017;135:1047–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Baker JD. The value of adult strabismus correction to the patient. JAAPOS 2002;6:136–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mills MD, Coats DK, Donahue SP, Wheeler DT; American Academy of Ophthalmology. Strabismus surgery for adults. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1255–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Beauchamp GR, Black BC, Coats DK, et al. The management of strabismus in adults—I. Clinical characteristics and treatment. J AAPOS 2003;7:233–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rosenbaum AL. The goal of adult strabismus surgery is not cosmetic. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martinez-Thompson JM, Diehl NN, Holmes JM, Mohney BG. Incidence, types, and lifetime risk of adult-onset strabismus. Ophthalmology 2014;121:877–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kurland LT, Molgaard CA. The patient record in epidemiology. Sci Am 1981;245:54–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tamhankar MA, Ying GS, Volpe NJ. Effectiveness of prisms in the management of diplopia in patients due to diverse etiologies. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2012;49:222–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.El-Sahn MF, Granet DB, Marvasti A, Roa A, Kinori M. Strabismus in adults older than 60 years. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2016;53:365–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pihlblad MS, Demer JL. Hypertropia in unilateral isolated abducens palsy. J AAPOS 2014;18:235–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peragallo JH, Pineles SL, Demer JL. Recent advances clarifying the etiologies of strabismus. J Neuroophthalmol 2015;35:185–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rutar T, Demer JL. “Heavy Eye” syndrome in the absence of high myopia: a connective tissue degeneration in elderly strabismic patients. J AAPOS 2009;13:36–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chaudhuri Z, Demer JL. Sagging eye syndrome: connective tissue involution as a cause of horizontal and vertical strabismus in older patients. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013;131:619–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tamhankar MA, Kim JH, Ying GS, Volpe NJ. Adult hypertropia: a guide to diagnostic evaluation based on review of 300 patients. Eye (Lond) 2011;25:91–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brodsky MC, Donahue SP, Vaphiades M, Brandt T. Skew deviation revisited. Surv Ophthalmol 2006;51:105–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Barton JJS. “Retinal diplopia” associated with macular wrinkling. Neurology 2004;63:925–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Veverka KK, Hatt SR, Leske DA, Brown WL, Iezzi R, Holmes JM. Causes of diplopia in patients with epiretinal membranes. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;179:39–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES