Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Jul 1;69(7):837–838. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800145

PHQ-9 Administration in Outpatient Adolescent Psychiatry Services

Keneisha Sinclair-McBride 1, Nicholas Morelli 2, Michaela Gusman 3
PMCID: PMC6291233  NIHMSID: NIHMS1511290  PMID: 29962317

TO THE EDITOR: Depression is a major public health concern among young people within the United States, yet 60% of depressed adolescents do not receive the necessary treatment (1). Increasingly, universal screening for depressive symptoms is being recommended across healthcare settings (2). One of the most popular depression screening instruments is the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (3), a freely available, psychometrically sound measure recommended by the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force for use in depression screening (4). The utility of the PHQ-9 has been well established in primary care (4, 5), but at present there is a paucity of research detailing the extent to which the PHQ-9 is effective in adolescent psychiatry settings.

Beginning in 2016, the outpatient psychiatry clinic at Boston Children’s Hospital implemented universal depression screening using the PHQ-9, allowing us to preliminarily evaluate the instrument’s feasibility in an adolescent outpatient population, and to examine associations with clinical management of depressive symptoms. From September 2016 to March 2017, 325 patients over the age of 12 were administered the PHQ-9 upon their visit to the clinic. Patients were 62% male and 63% white with a mean ± SD age of 16.03 ± 2.42 years. Session notes for clinic visits wherein the PHQ-9 was administered were reviewed for documentation of psychiatric diagnoses, referrals, safety planning, re-administration of the PHQ-9 at later date, and emergency assessments for possible hospitalization. The proposed project was approved by the Institutional Review Board as a quality improvement initiative.

Using a tablet, the PHQ-9 was administered efficiently to patients in the waitirng room before clinic visits. Most required less than 4 minutes to complete their responses. The PHQ-9’s positive predictive value for depression was 77%, lower than—but comparable to—the 88% found in earlier validation studies in primary care settings (3). PHQ-9 total scores were significantly correlated with scores on the clinician-rated Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS), such that higher depressive symptoms were associated with lower functioning (r = −.40, p < .001). High PHQ-9 scores were associated with clinicians’ tendency to (a) re-administer the PHQ-9 at a later date (F1, 323 = 5.53, p = .019), (b) make a referral for additional services (F1, 323 = 21.93, p < .001), and (c) create a safety plan (bordered on significance; F1, 323 = 3.58, p = .059).

Clinicians caring for patients with depressive symptoms have a variety of decisions to make regarding best practice, ranging from symptom monitoring to crisis evaluation. In the current sample, scores on the PHQ-9 accurately assessed symptom severity in a way that aligns with patient symptoms and clinician-rated levels of patient functioning. The PHQ-9’s high positive predictive value, as well as its significant associations with clinical decision-making, provides preliminary evidence that screening with this instrument may be a feasible way to assess depressive symptoms and thus inform patient care among young psychiatric outpatients. Future research should seek to employ longitudinal designs with validated outcome measures in order to more definitively establish the causal impact of universal screening on patient care.

Disclosures & Acknowledgments:

We would like to acknowledge the effort of Patrick Vittner, who conducted the literature search for this project and contributed in analyzing the data. Additionally, we would like to acknowledge Eugenia Chan and Eric Fleegler, who spearheaded the design and implementation of TriVox Health, the internet-based system through which data for this project was collected. This work was conducted with support from Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award UL1 TR001102) and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers, or the National Institutes of Health.

Contributor Information

Keneisha Sinclair-McBride, Children’s Hospital Boston - Psychiatry, Boston, Massachusetts, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Nicholas Morelli, Children’s Hospital Boston - Psychiatry, Boston, Massachusetts.

Michaela Gusman, Children’s Hospital Boston - Psychiatry, Boston, Massachusetts.

References

  • 1.Merikangas KR, He J, Burstein ME, et al. : Service utilization for lifetime mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 50:32–45, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anderson HD, Pace WD, Brandt E, et al. : Monitoring suicidal patients in primary care using electronic health records. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 28:65–71, 2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JW: The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16:606–613, 2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.D’Angelo EJ, Sinclair-McBride K, Tunick R, et al. : Screening and assessment of depression; in Handbook of Pediatric Psychological Screening and Assessment in Primary Care. Edited by Maruish M New York, NY, Taylor & Francis, 163–194, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nease DE, Malouin JM: Depression screening: a practical strategy. Journal of Family Medicine 52:118–126, 2003 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES