Publisher's Note: There is a Blood Commentary on this article in this issue.
Key Points
During the recovery from anemia, monocytes recruited to the spleen generate macrophages that form the stress erythropoiesis niche.
The maturation of monocytes into macrophages occurs in parallel with stress erythroid progenitor development.
Abstract
Anemic stress induces a physiological response that includes the rapid production of new erythrocytes. This process is referred to as stress erythropoiesis. It is best understood in the mouse where it is extramedullary and utilizes signals and progenitor cells that are distinct from bone marrow steady-state erythropoiesis. The development of stress erythroid progenitors occurs in close association with the splenic stress erythropoiesis niche. In particular, macrophages in the niche are required for proper stress erythropoiesis. Here we show that the expansion of the niche occurs in concert with the proliferation and differentiation of stress erythroid progenitors. Using lineage tracing analysis in 2 models of anemic stress, we show that the expansion of the splenic niche is due to the recruitment of monocytes into the spleen, which develop into macrophages that form erythroblastic islands. The influx in monocytes into the spleen depends in part on Ccr2-dependent signaling mediated by Ccl2 and other ligands expressed by spleen resident red pulp macrophages. Overall, these data demonstrate the dynamic nature of the spleen niche, which rapidly expands in concert with the stress erythroid progenitors to coordinate the production of new erythrocytes in response to anemic stress.
Visual Abstract
Introduction
Bone marrow (BM) steady-state erythropoiesis is primarily homeostatic. It produces new erythrocytes at a constant rate to replace senescent erythrocytes that are removed by macrophages in the spleen.1 In response to anemic stress, the situation is different, where stress erythropoiesis predominates. Stress erythropoiesis is best understood in the mouse where it is extramedullary occurring in the fetal liver during development and in the adult spleen and liver.2-5 It utilizes stress erythroid progenitors (SEPs) that are distinct from BM steady-state progenitors and are derived directly from short-term reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells (CD34+Kit+Sca1+Lin−).2,6,7 SEPs respond to signals such as Hedgehog, bone morphogenetic protein 4 (Bmp4), and growth and differentiation factor 15 (Gdf15), which are not associated with steady-state erythropoiesis.2,6,8,9 The developmental strategy of stress erythropoiesis utilizes these signals to drive the rapid proliferation of a discrete set of immature SEP populations that maintain their stem cell markers and act as a transient amplifying population. An increase in serum Epo concentration promotes their transition to committed erythroid progenitors that synchronously differentiate into erythrocytes.6,7 This wave of new erythrocytes maintains homeostasis until steady-state erythropoiesis can resume.
Early work by Bessis identified erythropoietic niches (erythroblastic islands, EBIs) in the BM, where erythroblasts proliferated and differentiated.10 These microenvironments were characterized by a central macrophage surrounded by developing erythroblasts.11 Later analysis identified similar structures in the murine spleen and fetal liver, further underscoring the essential nature of this erythroid niche.12 The interaction between the central macrophage and erythroblasts is mediated by adhesion molecules, such as αv, Vcam1, and CD169 on macrophages, and α4β1 and Icam4, on erythroblasts.11,13 This interaction allows macrophages to provide nutrients and signals to erythroblasts to regulate their proliferation and differentiation.11,13 In addition, macrophages phagocytose nuclei extruded from newly formed reticulocytes.14-16 During stress erythropoiesis, studies by us in vitro and by others in vivo have demonstrated that the regulation of stress erythropoiesis relies on the interaction between progenitor cells and macrophages in the stress erythropoiesis niche.6,17-19 Ablation of macrophages severely compromises the development of SEPs.6,17-19 In the spleen, red pulp macrophages (RPMs) are tissue-resident macrophages that regulate erythroid homeostasis by phagocytosing senescent erythrocytes and interacting with developing erythroblasts.1,20,21 Tissue-resident macrophages are derived from yolk sac definitive hematopoietic progenitors that seed tissues early in development.22-25 It is thought that tissue-resident macrophages proliferate in situ and are not replaced by monocyte-derived macrophages.26 Under conditions of regeneration, however, monocytes can replace tissue-resident cells.27 In the spleen, RPMs can be replaced by monocytes that infiltrate the spleen.28 This process requires heme-dependent signaling to activate the expression of the transcription factor SpiC, which in turn promotes the development of RPMs through a pre-RPM intermediate.21,29
In this report, we use lineage tracing and imaging flow cytometry to analyze the dynamic changes in EBIs during the recovery from anemic stress. We show that the expansion of the stress erythropoiesis niche is driven by the recruitment of monocytes into the spleen that differentiate into pre-RPMs and RPMs. Our data demonstrate that the EBIs in the spleen are dynamic structures where SEPs mature in concert with infiltrating monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages in the spleen. The influx of new monocytes into the spleen is in part regulated by the chemokine receptor Ccr2 expressed by monocytes and its ligands, including Ccl2, whose expression by tissue-resident RPMs is induced by erythrophagocytosis. Taken together, these data present a new paradigm where SEPs proliferate and mature in concert with the expansion and maturation of splenic stress erythropoiesis niche.
Materials and methods
Detailed study design and methods are described in the supplemental Methods, available on the Blood Web site.
Mice
All mice were maintained on the C57BL/6 background by backcrossing with C57BL/6 mice. B6.129S4-Ccl2tm1Rol/J (JAX: 004434, Ccl2−/−),30 B6.129P2(Cg)-Cx3cr1tm2.1(cre/ERT2)Litt/WganJ (JAX: 021160, Cx3cr1YFPCreER), B6;129S6-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm14(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J (JAX: 007908, Ai14tdTomato),31 B6;129S4-Ccr2tm1lfc/J (JAX: 004999 Ccr2−/−) mouse strains were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. Cx3cr1YFPCreER;tdTomato mouse strain was generated by breeding Cx3cr1YFPCreER mice with Ai14tdTomato mice. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Pennsylvania State University.
Monocyte fate-mapping
Cx3cr1YFPCreER;tdTomato recipient mice were injected intraperitoneally (IP) with tamoxifen (Sigma) in corn oil at 75 mg/kg body weight for 5 consecutive days prior to bone marrow transplant (BMT) or phenylhydrazine (PHZ) treatment. When serving as donors, Cx3cr1YFPCreER;tdTomato BM cells were isolated after the 5-day tamoxifen treatment and transplanted into CD45.1 recipient mice.
Splenic EBI enrichment
The isolation of splenic EBIs isolation was done as previously described.32,33 In brief, spleens were minced and digested in 0.075% (m/v) Collagenase IV (Gibco 17104019) and 0.004% (m/v) DNase I (Invitrogen DN25) in RPMI 1640 for 30 minutes at 37°C. The suspension was gently passed through an 18-gauge needle several times, and cells were washed by centrifugation. Cell pellets were resuspended with 1 mL RPMI 1640 containing 0.004% DNaseI and layered on top of 30% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum in Iscove modified Dulbecco medium followed by gravity sedimentation for 45 minutes at room temperature. The supernatant was carefully removed, and the pellet was processed with Percoll (Sigma) gradient centrifugation (50% [vol/vol]/100% [vol/vol]) at 400g for 20 minutes. The interface between the 50% and 100% Percoll was collected, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and processed for flow cytometry and imaging flow cytometry.
Statistical analysis
All quantitative data were represented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least duplicate biological replicates. Student t test was used for analyses of difference between 2 groups. Analysis of variance was used for analyzing experiments with >2 groups with Holm-Sidak test adjustment for multiple comparisons. Significance level was set at α = 0.05, with *P < .05, **P < .001, ***P < .005, ****P < .0001.
Results
Heterogeneity of niche macrophages in PHZ-induced stress erythropoiesis
PHZ-induced acute hemolytic anemia induces a rapid stress erythropoiesis response characterized by a 50-fold increase in stress burst forming units–erythroid by 36 hours after treatment.2 Using this model, we examined the changes in the niche macrophages in the spleen. At 48 hours after PHZ treatment, Ter119+ erythroblasts accumulated in the spleen (supplemental Figure 1A), which was coupled with an expansion of F4/80+ cells expressing CD169 and Vcam-1, which is typical of RPMs (Figure 1A; supplemental Figure 1B). To further characterize the spleen niche, we isolated EBI aggregates from spleens using a procedure that allows for the preservation of in vivo niche structures32 (supplemental Figure 1C-D). EBIs were costained for the erythroid marker Ter119 and the monocyte/macrophage markers (Figure 1B). Although the macrophages in the Ter119+ EBIs expressed F4/80, we observed a range of macrophage phenotypes that encompassed populations with characteristics of monocytes (CD11b+Ly6C+F4/80+), pre-RPMs (CD11b+Ly6C−F4/80+), and RPMs (CD11bloLy6C−F4/80hi). EBIs associated with pre-RPMs increased over time, and at 48 hours after treatment were the predominant population (Figure 1C). These data demonstrate that the spleen erythroid niche is highly dynamic during the recovery from anemia.
Kinetics of monocyte and macrophage populations during the recovery from anemia
To better characterize the macrophage and monocyte populations, we used erythroid short-term radioprotection as an alternative model. Splenic stress erythropoiesis is the primary source of new erythrocytes in the first 18 days after BMT.7 This model allowed us to follow the development of SEPs and characterize the changes that occur in monocyte/macrophage populations during recovery. We set up a gating strategy using F4/80, CD11b, and Ly6C that divided cells into 4 major populations, enriched for Ly6Chi monocytes (I), Ly6Clo monocytes (II), pre-RPMs (III), and RPMs (IV) (Figure 2A). We further characterized these populations using monocyte markers Cx3cr1 and CD115 and showed that the majority of Ly6Chi monocytes were CD11b+Ly6ChiF4/80midCx3cr1+CD115+ cells and Ly6Clo monocytes CD11b+Ly6CloF4/80midCx3cr1hiCD115lo/−, while pre-RPMs and RPMs expressed little Cx3CR1 and no CD115 (supplemental Figure 2A).
Splenic monocyte and macrophage populations were followed during the recovery from BMT. Days 1 and 2 represent the initial niche status, whereas the niche on days 6 to 16 after transplant corresponds to the expansion and maturation of stress burst forming units–erythroid.7 During the early stage, the numbers of monocytes (populations I and II) decreased, whereas pre-RPMs and RPMs maintained their levels; all of the populations were primarily recipient derived (Figure 2B-D). Starting on day 6, we observed an increase in Ly6Clo and Ly6Chi monocytes, which peaks at day 10 and continues until day 16. In contrast to the earlier time points, these monocytes were donor derived with 100% donor contribution by day 10. The numbers of pre-RPMs and RPMs also increased during these time points; however, the percentage of donor-derived pre-RPMs and RPMs was much less than the monocytes (Figure 2B-D). Further analysis showed that RPMs expressed high levels of F4/80, CD169, and Vcam1, whereas pre-RPMs generated from donor cells (after day 8) expressed much less F4/80 and slightly lower levels of CD169 and Vcam1. Ly6Clo monocytes expressed a low level of F4/80, but surprisingly expressed significant amounts of CD169 and Vcam1 (supplemental Figure 2B-D). In addition, we observed CD11b++Ly6C+cells that transiently appeared on day 2 and were recipient derived. They expressed an intermediate level of F4/80, Vcam-1, and CD169 (Figure 2B; supplemental Figure 2E). Consistent with increased monocytes, there was upregulation of the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of the chemokine Ccl2 that peaked from days 6 to 8. The expression of Gdf15 and Bmp4, which are the key regulators of stress erythropoiesis, increased in concert with Ccl2 (supplemental Figure 2F). Overall, these data are similar to what we observed during the recovery from PHZ-induced anemia (supplemental Figure 2G); the spleen erythroid niche contains dynamic populations of monocytes and macrophages during the course of recovery from BMT.
Macrophages and monocytes are present in EBIs during the recovery from anemia
We next isolated EBIs from the spleen during the recovery from BMT and analyzed Ter119+ aggregates by flow cytometry and imaging flow cytometry. For this analysis, we simplified the gating strategy by characterizing monocytes as CD11b+Ly6C+, which included both Ly6Chi and Ly6Clo populations, and macrophages as CD11bloLy6Clo, which included both pre-RPMs and PRMs, respectively, to ensure sufficient events for analysis. Overall, both CD11b+Ly6C+ cells and CD11bloLy6Clo cells appeared in the Ter119+ EBIs during the whole recovery process (supplemental Figure 3A). In the early stage, days 1 and 2, we observed recipient-derived CD11b+Ly6C+ and CD11bloLy6Clo cells as well as a transient population of CD11b++Ly6C+ monocytes in the Ter119+ aggregates. From day 6 onwards, CD11b+Ly6C+ cells became more prevalent in EBIs, and they were almost entirely donor derived. In contrast, ∼30% to 50% of CD11bloLy6Clo cells in EBIs were donor derived (Figure 2E-F). Analysis of the expression of F4/80, CD169, and Vcam1 revealed that CD11bloLy6Clo cells expressed high levels of the 3 molecules as expected because this population contains pre-RPMs and RPMs. Unexpectedly, the expression of CD169 and Vcam1 was similar in CD11bloLy6Clo and CD11b+Ly6C+ cells, suggesting this expression pattern is associated with EBIs (supplemental Figure 3B-C). Analysis using Imaging flow cytometry showed that on days 1 and 2, monocytes and macrophages were surrounded with enucleated (DAPIneg) mature erythroid cells, while on days 6, 9, and 14, EBIs contained nucleated (DAPI+) erythroblasts as we observed in the spleens of PHZ-treated mice (Figure 2G). Furthermore, we observed a continuum of monocyte and macrophage markers confirming the idea that splenic EBIs contained a varied population of monocyte–macrophage-like cells.
Monocytes are associated with early SEPs
Our previous work showed that during BMT, early SEPs rapidly proliferate in the spleen that are characterized by the expression of Kit, Sca-1, CD34, and CD133 but not Ter119.6 We next tested whether these SEPs associate with monocytes and macrophages in EBIs. Using coexpression of Kit and CD133 to mark early SEPs, we isolated EBIs and analyzed the expression of monocyte and macrophage markers. Initially, we observed both CD11b+Ly6C+ and CD11bloLy6Clo cells associated with Kit+CD133+ aggregates (Figure 2H). However, starting from day 10, donor-derived CD11b+Ly6C+ cells were the predominant population in the Kit+CD133+ aggregates (Figure 2I-J). Unlike the CD11b+Ly6C+ cells that we observed in the Ter119+EBIs, these CD11b+Ly6C+ cells expressed lower levels of F4/80, CD169, and Vcam-1 (Figure 2K; supplemental Figure 3D-F), suggesting these early niche cells were phenotypically more monocyte-like. These observations suggested that the early CD133+Kit+ SEPs initially interact with monocytes that mature into pre-RPMs and RPMs as the erythroid progenitors differentiate.
Monocytes differentiate into niche macrophages
RPMs are tissue-resident macrophages that populate the spleen during embryonic development and are maintained by proliferation in the tissue.22,23,26 The observation of monocyte-like cells in Ter119+ EBIs and CD133+ EBIs suggests that EBIs contain cells derived from monocytes rather than only tissue-resident macrophages. To test this idea, we performed a monocyte lineage tracing study using Cx3cr1YFPCreER;tdTomato mice that express yellow fluorescence protein (YFP) and tamoxifen-inducible CreER from the Cx3cr1 promoter expressed in monocytes coupled with a ROSA26-Stopfl/fl-tdTomato cassette. tdTomato expression (tdTomato+) can be induced by tamoxifen treatment that marks descendants of Cx3cr1+monocytes.34 Without any tamoxifen treatment, YFP+ marks Ly6Chi and Ly6Clo monocytes and to a lesser extent pre-RPMs and RPMs. The YFPlo/neg expression in pre-RPMs and RPMs reflects the decay of YFP protein as the cell differentiated from a Cx3cr1+(YFP+) precursor (supplemental Figure 4A).
We first performed monocyte lineage tracing in the PHZ-induced anemia model (Figure 3A). Strikingly, >30% of live cells in the spleen and >70% of EBIs contained labeled cells (supplemental Figure 4B-C). Further analysis showed that YFP+tdTomatoneg, YFP+tdTomato+, and YFPnegtdTomato+ cells contributed to RPMs. The numbers of labeled F4/80+Vcam1+ mature RPMs increased from 24 to 96 hours after treatment, suggesting that these monocyte-derived RPMs are maturing during the recovery period (Figure 3B,D). When analyzing Ter119+ EBI aggregates, we identified a similar pattern where the percentage of labeled cells that were mature (F4/80+Vcam1+) RPMs increased during the recovery period, demonstrating that monocyte-derived RPMs are recruited to EBIs during the recovery period (Figure 3C,E). In addition to the monocyte-derived macrophages in the niche, we observed YFPnegtdTomato+ cells in EBIs that lacked expression of monocyte/macrophage markers. A portion of this population, however, expressed markers of type I conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) (CD11c+MHCII+CD8α+) (supplemental Figure 4D). These cells were previously demonstrated to express Scf and are required for stress erythropoiesis.35 cDCs share a common Cx3cr1+ precursor with monocytes that explains their labeling by the lineage tracing.36 Similarly, cDCs were also found enriched in both SEP EBIs and Ter119+ EBIs on day 12 after BMT (supplemental Figure 4E). This surprising observation expands our model of the splenic stress erythroid niche to include other support cells and further underscores the dynamic nature of splenic microenvironment.
Next, we performed the lineage tracing in the transplant model. We used donor BM cells from Cx3cr1YFPCreER;tdTomato mice and CD45.1+ irradiated recipient mice (Figure 4A). We observed YFPnegtdTomato+ and YFP+tdTomato+ cells contributing to both RPMs and pre-RPMs. We also observed YFP+tdTomatoneg cells that developed from monocytes born after transplant contributing to pre-RPMs and RPMs (supplemental Figure 5A-B); however, the overall intensity of YFP expression decreased over time (supplemental Figure 5D). The percentage of labeled pre-RPMs and RPMs was highest on day 10 and decreased on days 14 and 16, which coincides with the decrease in terminal differentiation (Figure 4B-D). Analysis of Ter119+EBI aggregates showed that similar to the analysis of whole spleen, labeled cells were present as pre-RPM and RPM EBIs with the YFP+tdTomatoneg monocytes making a large contribution to Ter119+ aggregates (Figure 4E-G). The monocytic contribution to RPMs was further confirmed by transplanting tdTomato+-purified monocytes mixed with donor unlabeled BM cells (supplemental Figure 6A). Within the tdTomato+ population, we observed monocytes (CD11b+Ly6C+F4/80int), pre-RPMs (CD11b+Ly6C+F4/80+), and RPMs (CD11bloLy6CloF4/80hiVcam-1hi) populations in the spleen and in EBIs (supplemental Figure 6B-C), demonstrating that donor tdTomato+ monocytes give rise to pre-RPMs and RPMs that contribute to the splenic niche during the recovery from BMT. However, monocytes do not directly give rise to cDCs in EBIs (supplemental Figure 6D), consistent with the idea that cDCs may come from Cx3cr1+ precursors.
Early after BMT (days 1-4), our data showed that most of EBI macrophages were recipient derived. To examine if these EBI macrophages were derived from monocytes, we performed BMT using Cx3cr1YFPCreER;tdTomato mice as recipients and CD45.1+ control BM cells as donors (Figure 5A). Both YFP+tdTomato+ and YFPnegtdTomato+ cells were observed in whole spleens and EBIs on day 2 and day 4 after BMT (Figure 5B). The percentage of RPMs (F4/80+Vcam1+) in whole spleen increased from day 2 to day 4. This observation was further supported by analysis of YFP+tdTomato+ pre-RPMs or RPMs where the percentage of F4/80+Vcam1+ cells increased from days 2 to 4, suggesting that monocytes are differentiating into pre-RPMs and then to RPMs (Figure 5C-E; supplemental Figure 5C). This increase in labeled RPMs was also observed in Ter119+ aggregates, while at the same time the contribution of labeled monocytes decreased (Figure 5F-H).
Taken together, these data show that monocytes give rise to pre-RPMs and RPMs that contribute the expanding splenic erythroid niche.
Erythrophagocytosis marks Ccl2 producing cells
The maturation of RPMs from monocytes requires the transcription factor SpiC.29 Analysis of EBI aggregates during the recovery from BMT shows that SpiC mRNA expression increased and was maintained during recovery (Figure 6A). Heme-dependent signaling regulates the activation of SpiC expression.29 Erythrophagocytosis can lead to increases in intracellular heme, which can activate SpiC expression. To determine whether erythrophagocytosis increases during recovery, we transfused recipient mice with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE)-labeled erythrocytes prior to BMT (Figure 6B). Spleen mononuclear cells were analyzed on days 1 to 4 after transplant. CFSE+ cells were readily apparent on each day (Figure 6C). Analysis of CD11b, Ly6C, and F4/80 expression on CFSE+ cells showed that early on both monocytes (CD11b+Ly6ChiF4/80lo/−) and RPMs (CD11bloLy6CloF4/80+) were labeled with CFSE. The population of monocytes steadily decreased and was mostly lost by day 4, whereas the population of CFSE+ RPMs increased (Figure 6D-F). These data support the hypothesis that increased erythrophagocytosis promotes the differentiation of monocytes into RPMs during recovery from BMT.
The lineage tracing experiments showed that monocytes infiltrated into the spleen and became niche macrophages. Ccl2 is a monocyte chemoattractant. Ccl2+ cells in the spleen increased in the first 4 days after transplant (Figure 7A). In fact, Ccl2 mRNA expression rapidly increased in the first 6 to 12 hours after irradiation, and its expression was enriched in the CFSE+F4/80+ population (Figure 7B). Furthermore, Ccl2 protein expression was limited to CFSE+ cells, and by day 4, all CFSE+ cells were Ccl2+, suggesting that erythrophagocytosis promotes Ccl2 production (Figure 7C). We tested this idea in vitro by stimulating adherent spleen stromal cells with aged red blood cells. This stimulation led to a significant increase in Ccl2 mRNA expression (supplemental Figure 7A-B). Further analysis showed that Ccl2+ cells contained CD11b+Ly6C+ monocytes and CD11bloLy6CloF4/80+ RPMs. The percentage of Ccl2+ monocytes decreased as Ccl2+ RPMs increased, suggesting that Ccl2-producing phagocytic monocytes mature into RPMs (Figure 7D).
We next investigated the role of Ccl2 by using Ccl2−/− mice as donors and recipients in BMT. On day 10 posttransplant, we observed delayed recruitment of Ly6Chi and Ly6Clo monocytes into the spleen when Ccl2−/− donor cells were used. This effect was exacerbated when Ccl2−/− donor cells were transplanted into Ccl2−/− recipients. Despite this early defect, mutant groups reached a similar level as the controls by day 12 (Figure 7E-F). Analysis of Kit+CD133+ SEP expansion showed that it was also delayed at day 10 when Ccl2−/− was mutated in the donor cells and the recipients (Figure 7G; supplemental Figure 7C-D). However, control recipient mice appeared normal when transplanted with mutant donor cells, suggesting that recipient-derived Ccl2 plays a role in recruiting monocytes. We extended this analysis using donor cells that lacked the Ccl2 receptor, Ccr2. We observed reduced recruitment splenic monocytes and impaired expansion of SEPs, which was more severe than that observed with transplants using Ccl2−/− donors and recipients (Figure 7H-I). Together, these data suggested that Ccr2 and its ligands, including Ccl2, regulate monocyte influx into the spleen.
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrate that the splenic stress erythropoiesis niche is a dynamic structure that expands in concert with the expansion of the SEPs (Figure 7J). Lineage tracing experiments showed that the expansion of the niche relied on the influx of monocytes that gave rise to pre-RPMs and RPMs in EBIs. The monocyte/macrophage populations associated with EBI were heterogeneous as they expressed markers associated with a developmental continuum of monocytes, pre-RPMs, and RPMs. Despite this heterogeneity, the data support a model where the maturation of SEPs is coupled with monocytes/macrophages maturation. This trend was best exemplified in the BMT model where the most immature CD133+Kit+ SEPs were associated with CD11b+Ly6C+ cells expressing lower levels of F4/80, CD169, and Vcam1 that appeared to be more “monocyte-like,” whereas Ter119+ EBIs contained pre-RPMs and RPMs that expressed CD169 and Vcam1. The expression of CD169 on EBI macrophages is consistent with the data from Chow et al17,18 that deletion of CD169+ cells severely compromised stress erythropoiesis. The idea that monocytes may mature in concert with SEPs is consistent with human in vitro experiments showing that CD14+ monocytes improve erythroid differentiation in CD34+ cell cultures.37 Furthermore, treatment of CD14+ monocytes with glucocorticoids leads to their maturation into macrophages that express CD169 and other markers associated with EBIs such as CD163.37,38 The macrophages derived from CD14+ cells also exhibit properties similar to CD163+ erythroblast supporting macrophages found in fetal liver and BM.39 These macrophages are highly motile and exhibit increased interactions with erythroblasts in vitro. Corticosteroids increase in response to anemic stress (L. Bennett and R.F.P., unpublished data, 2017), suggesting a role of glucocorticoids in monocyte development during stress erythropoiesis, however, it is not well understood. Work from Jacobsen et al40-42 showed that BM EBI macrophages are F4/80+CD11b+Vcam1+ER-H3+CD169+Ly6G+, and depletion by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment leads to a loss of medullary erythropoiesis. We did not detect any Ly6G+ cells in the splenic stress erythropoiesis niche, which fits with the observation that splenic erythropoiesis was not affected by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment. These data suggest that BM medullary EBIs are different than stress EBIs.
RPMs are tissue-resident macrophages that are thought to be seeded into the fetal spleen by yolk sac–derived progenitors.22-25 Tissue-resident macrophages for the most part are not replenished by monocytes.26,33 Ulyanova et al43 showed that the CD11blo macrophages expanded in response to PHZ-induced hemolytic anemia from which they concluded that proliferation of tissue-resident macrophages expands the niche. Paradoxically, they also showed that SpiC−/− mice recovered normally from PHZ-induced anemia despite the fact that these mice have few RPMs in their spleens. Using lineage tracing, we show that the CD11blo population is derived from Cx3cr1+ monocytes. This observation is consistent with data from Haldar et al,29 which showed that heme-dependent signaling induced the differentiation of monocytes into pre-RPMs (CD11b+Ly6C+SpiClo) and RPMs (F4/80hiCD11bloSpiChi). We also observe an increase in SpiC expression during the recovery from anemia associated with increased erythrophagocytosis, which is consistent with heme-dependent activation of SpiC expression. The question still remains that if SpiC is required for the development of RPMs, why do SpiC−/− mice recover normally from acute anemia? Our data show that the majority of Ter119+ EBIs contain pre-RPMs. It is possible that in SpiC−/− mice, monocyte-derived “pre-RPMs” can develop sufficiently to contribute to the splenic erythroid niche. Contrarily, as mentioned above, other signals (like corticosteroids) could contribute to the maturation of monocytes in the spleen such that the SpiC−/− niche is sufficient to support stress erythropoiesis.
Although tissue-resident macrophages are usually not replaced by monocyte-derived macrophages, this requirement is not absolute.44 Kupffer cells in the liver are tissue-resident macrophages. During infection or loss due to liver damage, new Kupffer cells are generated from monocytes.45 These data suggest that at times of need or regeneration, monocytes can generate tissue-resident macrophages that resemble yolk sac–derived macrophages. The contributions of monocytes to tissue-resident macrophages can be transient. The demand for iron recycling macrophages in the liver induces monocytes to infiltrate the liver and that transiently provides new iron recycling macrophages.46 This process is regulated by an increase in chemokine expression, primarily Ccl2 and Ccl3. We observe a similar increase in the expression of Ccl2 by cells actively phagocytosing erythrocytes. These data suggest that erythrophagocytosis is an early event that leads to the recruitment of monocytes to expand the niche. These data complement other work from our laboratory where erythrophagocytosis by macrophages induces the expression of Bmp4 and Gdf15, 2 factors that promote the proliferation and development of SEPs (L. Bennett and R.F.P., unpublished data, 2017). Analysis of the niche also showed that type1 cDCs are also recruited. These cells express membrane-bound Scf, which is also required for the proliferation of SEPs.35 Taken together, our data support a model where anemic stress not only induces the proliferation and differentiation of SEPs but also coordinates the expansion and development of the splenic stress erythroid niche.
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article contains a data supplement.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank members of the Prabhu and Paulson laboratories for their timely help and suggestions and Margherita Cantorna and Na Xiong for providing reagents and advice.
This work was supported, in part, by grants from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases R01 DK077152, Office of Dietary Supplements (K.S.P.), and R01 DK080040 (R.F.P.), and USDA-NIFA Hatch project numbers 4605 (K.S.P.) and 4581 (R.F.P.).
Footnotes
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.
Authorship
Contribution: C.L. performed experiments and wrote the manuscript; and K.S.P. and R.F.P. supervised and conceived the study, secured funds, and wrote the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Robert F. Paulson, Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Center for Molecular Immunology and Infectious Disease, The Pennsylvania State University, 115 Henning Building, University Park, PA 16802; e-mail: rfp5@psu.edu; and K. Sandeep Prabhu, Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Center for Molecular Immunology and Infectious Disease, The Pennsylvania State University, 115 Henning Building, University Park, PA 16802; e-mail: ksp4@psu.edu.
REFERENCES
- 1.Klei TR, Meinderts SM, van den Berg TK, van Bruggen R. From the cradle to the grave: the role of macrophages in erythropoiesis and erythrophagocytosis. Front Immunol. 2017;8:73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lenox LE, Perry JM, Paulson RF. BMP4 and Madh5 regulate the erythroid response to acute anemia. Blood. 2005;105(7):2741-2748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lenox LE, Shi L, Hegde S, Paulson RF. Extramedullary erythropoiesis in the adult liver requires BMP-4/Smad5-dependent signaling. Exp Hematol. 2009;37(5):549-558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Paulson RF, Shi L, Wu DC. Stress erythropoiesis: new signals and new stress progenitor cells. Curr Opin Hematol. 2011;18(3):139-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Porayette P, Paulson RF. BMP4/Smad5 dependent stress erythropoiesis is required for the expansion of erythroid progenitors during fetal development. Dev Biol. 2008;317(1):24-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xiang J, Wu DC, Chen Y, Paulson RF. In vitro culture of stress erythroid progenitors identifies distinct progenitor populations and analogous human progenitors. Blood. 2015;125(11):1803-1812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harandi OF, Hedge S, Wu DC, McKeone D, Paulson RF. Murine erythroid short-term radioprotection requires a BMP4-dependent, self-renewing population of stress erythroid progenitors. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(12):4507-4519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Perry JM, Harandi OF, Porayette P, Hegde S, Kannan AK, Paulson RF. Maintenance of the BMP4-dependent stress erythropoiesis pathway in the murine spleen requires hedgehog signaling. Blood. 2009;113(4):911-918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Perry JM, Harandi OF, Paulson RF. BMP4, SCF, and hypoxia cooperatively regulate the expansion of murine stress erythroid progenitors. Blood. 2007;109(10):4494-4502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bessis M. Erythroblastic island, functional unit of bone marrow [in French]. Rev Hematol (Paris). 1958;13:8-11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chasis JA, Mohandas N. Erythroblastic islands: niches for erythropoiesis. Blood. 2008;112(3):470-478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Manwani D, Bieker JJ. The erythroblastic island. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;82:23-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mohandas N, Chasis JA. The erythroid niche: molecular processes occurring within erythroblastic islands. Transfus Clin Biol. 2010;17:110-111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yoshida H, Kawane K, Koike M, Mori Y, Uchiyama Y, Nagata S. Phosphatidylserine-dependent engulfment by macrophages of nuclei from erythroid precursor cells. Nature. 2005;437(7059):754-758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Keerthivasan G, Wickrema A, Crispino JD. Erythroblast enucleation. Stem Cells Int. 2011;2011:139851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kawane K, Fukuyama H, Kondoh G, et al. . Requirement of DNase II for definitive erythropoiesis in the mouse fetal liver. Science. 2001;292(5521):1546-1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chow A, Huggins M, Ahmed J, et al. . CD169(+) macrophages provide a niche promoting erythropoiesis under homeostasis and stress. Nat Med. 2013;19:429-436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chow A, Lucas D, Hidalgo A, et al. . Bone marrow CD169+ macrophages promote the retention of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the mesenchymal stem cell niche. J Exp Med. 2011;208:261-271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ramos P, Casu C, Gardenghi S, et al. . Macrophages support pathological erythropoiesis in polycythemia vera and beta-thalassemia. Nat Med. 2013;19:437-445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ganz T. Macrophages and systemic iron homeostasis. J Innate Immunol. 2012;4:446-453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Haldar M, Murphy KM. Origin, development, and homeostasis of tissue-resident macrophages. Immunol Rev. 2014;262(1):25-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yona S, Kim KW, Wolf Y, et al. . Fate mapping reveals origins and dynamics of monocytes and tissue macrophages under homeostasis [published correction appears in Immunity. 2013;38(5):1073-1079]. Immunity. 2013;38(1):79-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ginhoux F, Guilliams M. Tissue-resident macrophage ontogeny and homeostasis. Immunity. 2016;44(3):439-449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hoeffel G, Ginhoux F. Ontogeny of tissue-resident macrophages. Front Immunol. 2015;6:486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hoeffel G, Chen J, Lavin Y, et al. . C-Myb(+) erythro-myeloid progenitor-derived fetal monocytes give rise to adult tissue-resident macrophages. Immunity. 2015;42(4):665-678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hashimoto D, Chow A, Noizat C, et al. . Tissue-resident macrophages self-maintain locally throughout adult life with minimal contribution from circulating monocytes. Immunity. 2013;38(4):792-804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lin SL, Castaño AP, Nowlin BT, Lupher ML Jr, Duffield JS. Bone marrow Ly6Chigh monocytes are selectively recruited to injured kidney and differentiate into functionally distinct populations. J Immunol. 2009;183(10):6733-6743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Swirski FK, Nahrendorf M, Etzrodt M, et al. . Identification of splenic reservoir monocytes and their deployment to inflammatory sites. Science. 2009;325(5940):612-616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Haldar M, Kohyama M, So AY, et al. . Heme-mediated SPI-C induction promotes monocyte differentiation into iron-recycling macrophages. Cell 2014;156:1223-1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lu B, Rutledge BJ, Gu L, et al. . Abnormalities in monocyte recruitment and cytokine expression in monocyte chemoattractant protein 1-deficient mice. J Exp Med. 1998;187(4):601-608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, et al. . A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(1):133-140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sadahira Y, Mori M, Kimoto T. Isolation and short-term culture of mouse splenic erythroblastic islands. Cell Struct Funct. 1990;15(1):59-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liao C, Hardison RC, Kennett MJ, Carlson BA, Paulson RF, Prabhu KS. Selenoproteins regulate stress erythroid progenitors and spleen microenvironment during stress erythropoiesis. Blood. 2018;131(23):2568-2580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.O’Koren EG, Mathew R, Saban DR. Fate mapping reveals that microglia and recruited monocyte-derived macrophages are definitively distinguishable by phenotype in the retina. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):20636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kim TS, Hanak M, Trampont PC, Braciale TJ. Stress-associated erythropoiesis initiation is regulated by type 1 conventional dendritic cells. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(10):3965-3980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Merad M, Sathe P, Helft J, Miller J, Mortha A. The dendritic cell lineage: ontogeny and function of dendritic cells and their subsets in the steady state and the inflamed setting. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31(1):563-604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Heideveld E, Hampton-O’Neil LA, Cross SJ, et al. . Glucocorticoids induce differentiation of monocytes towards macrophages that share functional and phenotypical aspects with erythroblastic island macrophages. Haematologica. 2018;103(3):395-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Falchi M, Varricchio L, Martelli F, et al. . Dexamethasone targeted directly to macrophages induces macrophage niches that promote erythroid expansion. Haematologica. 2015;100(2):178-187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Seu KG, Papoin J, Fessler R, et al. . Unraveling macrophage heterogeneity in erythroblastic islands. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jacobsen RN, Forristal CE, Raggatt LJ, et al. . Mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor blocks medullar erythropoiesis by depleting F4/80(+)VCAM1(+)CD169(+)ER-HR3(+)Ly6G(+) erythroid island macrophages in the mouse. Exp Hematol. 2014;42:547-561.e544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jacobsen RN, Nowlan B, Brunck ME, Barbier V, Winkler IG, Levesque JP. Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (Flt3) ligand depletes erythroid island macrophages and blocks medullar erythropoiesis in the mouse. Exp Hematol. 2016;44:207-212.e204. doi:. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jacobsen RN, Perkins AC, Levesque JP. Macrophages and regulation of erythropoiesis. Curr Opin Hematol. 2015;22(3):212-219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ulyanova T, Phelps SR, Papayannopoulou T. The macrophage contribution to stress erythropoiesis: when less is enough. Blood. 2016;128(13):1756-1765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Guilliams M, Scott CL. Does niche competition determine the origin of tissue-resident macrophages? Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(7):451-460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Scott CL, Zheng F, De Baetselier P, et al. . Bone marrow-derived monocytes give rise to self-renewing and fully differentiated Kupffer cells. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Theurl I, Hilgendorf I, Nairz M, et al. . On-demand erythrocyte disposal and iron recycling requires transient macrophages in the liver. Nat Med. 2016;22(8):945-951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.