Abstract
The AP2/ERF superfamily of transcription factors is one of the largest transcription factor families in plants and plays an important role in plant development processes and stress responses. In this study, BjABR1, an AP2/ERF superfamily gene, from tuber mustard (Brassica juncea var. tumida Tsen et Lee), sharing high amino acid sequence similarity with the AtABR1 (Arabidopsis thaliana AP2-like abscisic acid repressor 1) gene, were performed functional research, and the ABR1 homologous genes in Brassica species were identified and performed phylogenetic analysis. The promoter sequence of BjABR1 contained many phytohormone- and stress-related cis-elements; ABA (abscisic acid) and abiotic stresses can induce BjABR1 expression in tuber mustard; overexpression of BjABR1 in Arabidopsis can alleviate plant sensitivity to ABA and salt and osmotic stresses, and the alleviation may be due to changes in stress/ABA-induced gene expression. These results indicated that BjABR1 functions in ABA and abiotic stress responses. By BLAST searches against the genome database of five Brassica species (three diploids, B. rapa, B. nigra, and B. oleracea, and two allotetraploid, B. juncea and B. napus) using the protein sequence of AtABR1, 3, 3, 3, 6, and 5 ABR1 homologous genes in B. nigra, B. rapa, B. oleracea, B. juncea, and B. napus were identified, respectively, and they shared high sequence similarity. By sequence analysis, annotation mistakes of the protein-coding regions of two ABR1 homologous genes, GSBRNA2T00134741001 and BjuB007684, were found and corrected. Then, the evolution analysis of these ABR1 homologous genes showed that the ancestor of the three diploid species had three ABR1 homologous genes and each diploid inherited all the three genes from their ancestor; then, allotetraploid B. juncea inherited all the six genes from B. rapa and B. nigra with no gene lost, while allotetraploid B. napus inherited all the three genes from B. oleracea and two genes from B. rapa with one gene lost, indicating that ABR1 homologous genes possessed greater hereditary conservation in Brassica species. The ABR1 homologous genes between B. rapa and B. oleracea shared much higher sequence similarity compared to that of B. nigra in diploid species, indicating that ABR1 homologous genes in B. nigra had experienced more rapid evolution, and B. rapa and B. oleracea may share closer relationship compared to B. nigra. Moreover, the spatial and temporal expression analysis of six ABR1 homologous genes of tuber mustard showed that they possessed different expression models. These results imply that ABR1 homologous genes are important to Brassica plants, and they may possess similar function in ABA and abiotic stress responses but play a role in different tissues and growing stages of plant. This study will provide the foundation to the functional research of ABR1 homologous genes in the Brassica species and help to reveal and understand the evolution mechanisms of Brassica species.
Keywords: Abiotic stress and abscisic acid responses, Brassica species, ABR1 homologous genes, Tuber mustard, BjABR1, Evolutionary trajectory
Introduction
The AP2/ERF (APETELLA2/Ethylene Responsive Element Binding Factor) superfamily of transcription factors is one of the largest transcription factor families in plants. This gene family was believed to be part of the plant kingdom only for a long time, but recent reports showed that the AP2/ERF superfamily members were present in various protists and ciliates (Licausi, Ohme-Takagi & Perata, 2013). The AP2/ERF superfamily contains at least one AP2/ERF domain consisting of about 60–70 highly conserved amino acids and involving in DNA binding (Ohmetakagi & Shinshi, 1995).
Based on sequence similarities and the number of AP2/ERF domains, the superfamily was further classified into four families: ERF, AP2, RAV (Related to ABI3/VP) and Soloist (Nakano et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2013; Lata et al., 2014; Matías-Hernández et al., 2014). Most of the genes containing a single AP2/ERF domain are classified into ERF family. Genes containing multiple AP2/ERF domains are classified into AP2 family. Members containing AP2 domain and B3-like DNA-binding domain are classified into RAV family (Matías-Hernández et al., 2014). Besides, there is a small group of genes with a highly diverged AP2 domain and gene structure from the ERF and RAV families classified into the Soloists (Sakuma et al., 2002).
According to the amino acid sequence of the DNA binding domain, the ERF family was separated into two subfamilies, the DREB/CBF (dehydration responsive element binding/C-repeat CRT binding transcription factors) subfamily and ERF subfamily (Sakuma et al., 2002). The DREB/CBF hereafter referred as DREB is a major member of AP2/ERF superfamily, which binds to DRE (A/GCCGAC) or CRT (TGGCCGAC) core cis-acting sequences in promoters (Yamaguchi-Shinozaki & Shinozaki, 1994; Agarwal et al., 2006), while the ERF binds to GCC (AGCCGCC) core cis-acting sequences (Ohmetakagi & Shinshi, 1995).
With the availability of more genomic data, genome wide identification of AP2/ERF superfamily members has been conducted in various plants, such as Arabidopsis (Nakano et al., 2006), rice (Nakano et al., 2006), maize (Liu et al., 2013), foxtail millet (Lata et al., 2014), Barley (Guo et al., 2016), cauliflower (Li et al., 2017), pepper (Jin et al., 2018). Moreover, the functions of AP2/ERF genes have been widely studied in the model plant Arabidopsis and in other plants. The AP2/ERF gene members play an important role in the regulation of different development processes as well as stress responses in plants. The AP2 family genes function mainly in plant development, such as in flower (Licausi, Ohme-Takagi & Perata, 2013; Aukerman & Sakai, 2003; Zhang et al., 2018), seed (Wang et al., 2016; Ohto et al., 2009), leaf (Moose & Sisco, 1996), root (Kitomi et al., 2011). The RAV family genes are considered to regulate plant development and participate in stress responses (Matías-Hernández et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2014). The DREB subfamily genes function mainly in abiotic stress responses, such as drought (Liu et al., 2013; Liao et al., 2016), heat (Qin et al., 2007; Hong et al., 2009), low-temperature (Sakuma et al., 2002), osmotic (Wang et al., 2011a), and high-salt stress (Schmidt et al., 2013). The ERF subfamily genes are characterized to play a role in stress responses (Müller & Munné-Bosch, 2015), plant hormone responses (Müller & Munné-Bosch, 2015; Pandey et al., 2005), plant metabolism, growth, and development (Go et al., 2014; Chandler et al., 2007; Nie et al., 2018), and so on. The Soloist genes are considered to play a role in hormone, biotic and abiotic responses (Giri et al., 2014).
The Brassica is an important genus of Brassicaceae and have rich diversity with respect to both speciation and the abundant morphotypes in each Brassica species. Brassica species are also important crops grown worldwide for human nutrition, containing a diverse range of oilseed, condiment, and vegetable crops (Warwick, Francis & Al-Shehbaz, 2006). The “triangle of U” model (Nagaharu, 1935) has been applied to describe the evolutionary relationships among the six widely cultivated Brassica species, the diploids Brassica rapa (AA), B. nigra (BB), and B. oleracea (CC) and the allotetraploids B. juncea (AABB), B. napus (AACC), and B. carinata (BBCC). B. juncea, B. napus, and B. carinata were formed by hybridization between B. rapa and B. nigra, between B. rapa and B. oleracea, and between B. nigra and B. oleracea, respectively, followed by spontaneous chromosome doubling. To this day, the genomes of the five important Brassica species, B. rapa, B. oleracea, B. nigra, B. napus, and B. juncea have been published (Wang et al., 2011b; Liu et al., 2014; Parkin et al., 2014; Chalhoub et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2016). The genome-wide analysis of the AP2_ERF superfamily genes has been conducted in B. rapa, B. oleracea, and B. napus (Song, Li & Hou, 2013; Li et al., 2017; Thamilarasan et al., 2014; Song et al., 2016).
Tuber mustard, B. juncea var. tumida Tsen et Lee, is a very popular vegetable used as raw material for Fuling mustard. In previous study, we have analyzed the transcriptome of stem development in tuber mustard by RNA sequencing (Sun et al., 2012), and then, we cloned one of differentially expressed genes, named BjABR1 (GenBank accession No. JQ713825.1) (Xiang et al., 2014), which shared high amino acid sequence similarity with the AtABR1 (Arabidopsis thaliana AP2-like abscisic acid repressor 1) gene (AT5g64750) (Pandey et al., 2005). BjABR1 protein contained a conserved AP2/ERF domain and was located in nucleus by onion epidermal subcellular localization analysis, indicating that BjABR1 was a potential AP2/ERF transcription factor gene (Xiang et al., 2014). The AtABR1 gene of A. thaliana responded to ABA and stress conditions including cold, high salt, and drought, and functioned as a repressor of ABA response in Arabidopsis (Pandey et al., 2005). The expression of BjABR1 in tuber mustard was inducible under salt, osmotic and cold stresses (Xiang et al., 2014). Here, we show data on BjABR1 which functions in ABA and abiotic stress responses. Moreover, due to the availability of the genome data of the five Brassica species, B. rapa, B. oleracea, B. nigra, B. napus, and B. juncea, it is possible to study systematically a class of homologous genes in the Brassica species. Here, we present the evolutionary trajectory of ABR1 homologous genes in Brassica species and the expression patterns of ABR1 homologous genes in tuber mustard. This study will provide the foundation to the functional research of ABR1 homologous genes in the Brassica species and help to reveal and understand the evolution mechanisms of Brassica species.
Materials and Methods
Plant growth and stress treatments to tuber mustard
Seeds of tuber mustard cultivar Yong’an were provided by Chongqing Fuling Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Chongqing, China. The seeds were sown in October and plants grew in their natural environments in Chongqing, China. The roots, stems, and leaf of 14-week-old (before the start of stem swelling) and 16-week-old (stem welling stage) tuber mustard were respectively harvested and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen for total RNA preparation and semi-quantitative analysis. For ABA treatment, abscisic acid (ABA, 10 µM) were sprayed onto 1-month-old tuber mustard seedlings to ensure total coverage of the foliage area. The seedlings were collected respectively at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 12 h after ABA treatments with three biological replicates, and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen for total RNA preparation and qRT-PCR analysis.
Cloning of BjABR1 promoter and sequence analysis
The tuber mustard genomic DNA were used for genome walking according to the described method previously (Li et al., 2002). The TAIL-PCR method and the Genome Walking kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) were used to perform genome walking to isolate the promoter region of BjABR1 gene following the manufacturer’s protocol. The random primers were improved following a previous study (Liu & Chen, 2007), and the three specific primers, SP1 (5′-AAGGAGGCGTGAGGGAGTT-3′), SP2 (5′-TCACGGTGGAGGTAGTCATC-3′), and SP3 (5′-TTCCTGATTTGCCACTTTT-3′), were designed as reverse primers according to the genomic DNA sequence of BjABR1. The PLANTCARE database (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) was used to identify potential cis-regulatory elements within the promoter.
Construction of the plant expression vector and generation of transgenic plants
To generate the plant transformation vector pCAMBIA1302::BjABR1, the cDNA fragment with the complete ORF of BjABR1 was synthesized from the total RNA using a pair of primers (sense primer: 5′- AGATCT (BalII) TGCGTGCCTTAAAAGTG -3′, reverse primer: 5′-GGTTACC (Bst EII) TTAAGAGGATGGGCTAT -3′). After validating its sequence, the PCR fragments were digested by BalII and Bst EII and ligated into the plasmid pCAMBIA1302 expression vectors which were also digested by BalII and Bst EII but removed the GFP gene. The pCAMBIA1302::BjABR1 constructs were then transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 cells.
Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Col-0) seeds were sown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 1% sucrose and 1% agar in a growth incubator. The growth conditions were as below: 23 °C, 75% relative humidity, and the photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h darkness. The pCAMBIA1302::BjABR1 constructs were transferred into Arabidopsis plants using the floral dip method to obtain first-generation (T0) seeds. To obtain the homozygous, T0 seeds were planted on MS medium with 25 mg L−1 hygromycin (Dingguo, Beijing, China) to obtain second-generation (T1) seeds. The T1 seeds were then planted on MS medium with 25 mg L−1 hygromycin, and the transgenic lines with a segregation ratio of 3:1 (resistant:sensitive) were selected to be third-generation (T2) seeds. The T2 seeds were planted on MS medium with 25 mg L−1 hygromycin. When the T3 lines displayed 100% hygromycin resistance, they were considered as homozygous and their seeds were harvested to use for following experiments.
Stress treatments to Arabidopsis
Approximately 100 seeds each from the wild-type Arabidopsis and transgenic line were sown on MS medium containing 100 mM NaCl, 200 mM NaCl, 200 mM mannitol, 400 mM mannitol, one µM ABA, or two µM ABA to test the germination (radicle emergence). Seeds were firstly incubated for 3 days at 4 °C in darkness to break seed dormancy, and then transferred into a growth incubator keeping 23 °C. The germination was scored daily for 9 days after transferring to 23 °C. For plant growth assays, seeds of wild-type Arabidopsis and transgenic lines were sown on MS medium to germinate (radicle emergence). The germinated seeds were then transferred to MS medium containing 100 mM NaCl, 200 mM NaCl, 200 mM mannitol, 400 mM mannitol, one μM ABA, or two μM ABA, and the seedlings were photographed on day 10 after transferring. Three biological replicates were performed.
For expression analysis of previously identified stress-inducible genes, RD29B and RD22, 3-week-old wild type and transgenic seedlings were sprayed with water (CK), 200 mM NaCl, and 400 mM mannitol to ensure total coverage of the foliage area, respectively. For expression analysis of previously identified ABA-inducible genes, ABI3, 3-week-old wild type and transgenic seedlings were also sprayed with water (CK) and 10 µM ABA, respectively. A total of 3 h after stress or ABA treatments, total RNAs of seedlings were then extracted, and qRT-PCR analyses were performed. Three biological replicates were performed.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) validation
AMV RNA PCR Kit 3.0 (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) was used to reverse-transcribe the total RNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol. SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ Kit (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) was used to perform qRT-PCR reactions with primers for BjABR1, RD29B, RD22, ABI3, and 18S rRNA genes. The 18S rRNA gene was used as the internal control. The primer pairs are listed in Table S1. A Bio-Rad iQ5 realtime PCR detection was used to perform the qRT-PCR reactions. Three replicates per sample were examined.
Identification and phylogenetic analysis of ABR1 homologous genes in Brassica species
Five whole-genome sequenced Brassica species were used in the present study, including three diploid species (B. oleracea, B. rapa, and B. nigra) and two allotetraploid species (B. juncea and B. napus). The genomic information of B. rapa (version 2.0), B. nigra (version 1.1), B. juncea (version 1.1), and B. napus (version 5) was provided in the Brassica Database (BRDB, http://brassicadb.org/brad/index.php), while the genomic information of B. oleracea (version 2.1) was provided in the Ensembl Plants Database (http://plants.ensembl.org/Brassica_oleracea/Info/Index). The genomic information of A. thaliana was also provided in BRDB. The cloned protein sequence, intron sequence, and promoter sequence of BjABR1 gene was analyzed by BLAST searches against B. juncea database of BRDB. The amino acid sequence of AtABR1 (AT5g64750) gene was analyzed by BLAST searches against A. thaliana database of BRDB to confirm no other ABR1 homologous genes in A. thaliana. The amino acid sequence of AtABR1 gene was submitted as a query to identify ABR1 homologous genes in Brassica species, including B. nigra, B. rapa, B. oleracea, B. juncea, and B. napus, and the genes whose sequence similarity scores were greater than 300 were ABR1 homologous genes, while the other genes, whose sequence similarity scores were all less than 100 were not homologous to ABR1 gene.
The nucleotide or amino acid sequences of the ABR1 homologous genes were aligned using the software DANMAN 7.0 to view their nucleotide or amino acid sequences changes. Multiple alignment of amino acid sequences of the ABR1 homologous genes were performed together using ClustalX (Thompson, Higgins & Gibson, 1994) with default options and a nj format file containing genetic distance was generated. One minus the genetic distance was the similarity of pairwise sequences. A subsequent manual alignment correction was accomplished by using MEGA 5.1 (Tamura et al., 2011). Phylogenetic trees were constructed by means of the bootstrap neighbor-joining (NJ) method and a Kimura 2-parameter model that were provided by MEGA 5.05. The stability of internal nodes was assessed by bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates. The physical location data of exons and introns of ABR1 homologous genes were retrieved from the genomic information and the exon-intron structures were displayed by using the Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS, http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn).
Semi-quantitative analysis of ABR1 homologous genes in tuber mustard
The spatial and temporal expression of six ABR1 homologous genes of tuber mustard, BjuA008532, BjuA008665, BjuA023050, BjuA032667, BjuB001787, and BjuB007684_correction, were examined using semi-quantitative method. AMV RNA PCR Kit 3.0 (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) was used to reverse-transcribe the total RNAs of roots, stems, and leaf of 14-week-old and 16-week-old tuber mustard, respectively. To control for genomic DNA contamination, a reaction lacking reverse transcriptase was performed in parallel for each sample. PCR amplification of a 235 bp fragment of tuber mustard Actin3 gene (BjuA014894), using intron-flanking and gene-specific primers (Table S1), was controlled for the presence of equal amounts of cDNA template in each reaction. Gene-specific primers of BjuA008532, BjuA008665, BjuA023050, BjuA032667, BjuB001787, and BjuB007684_correction genes were designed according to specific region of nucleotide sequences based on the alignment result of nucleotide sequences among the ABR1 homologous genes. These gene-specific primers were listed in Table S1 and used to amplify the coding regions of BjuA008532 (286 bp), BjuA008665 (303 bp), BjuA023050 (324 bp), BjuA032667 (371 bp), BjuB001787 (228 bp), and BjuB007684_correction (417 bp) by PCR. The amplified products were also validated by sequencing. In the PCR reactions of six ABR1 homologous genes, three parameters, the annealing temperature, the extension time, and the quantities of templates were set according to Tm values of primers, the length of amplified segments, and equal amounts of cDNA template in each reaction adjusted by Actin3 gene, respectively, and the cycle numbers all are 30 times.
Results
Cloning and sequence analysis of BjABR1 promoter
With reference to the genomic DNA sequence of BjABR1, a 1,212 bp sequence upstream of the coding region was isolated using the genome walking method. A promoter motif search was performed using the PLANTCARE database showed that a number of putative plant cis-elements were present. As shown in Fig. 1, some hormone-related elements were recognized, including the MeJA-responsive element (TGACG-motif), salicylic acid responsive element (TCA-element), and gibberellin-responsive element (GARE-motif); some stress-related elements were recognized, such as heat stress responsiveness element (HSE), low-temperature responsiveness element (LTR), defense and stress responsiveness element (TC-rich repeats), fungal elicitor responsive element (Box-W1), anaerobic induction element (ARE); light-responsive elements, such as the Box 4, ACE, Box I, G-box, Sp1, chs-CMA1a were observed; some development-related elements were also explored, including meristem specific activation element (CCGTCC-box), and cell cycle regulation element (MSA-like). The presence of these putative cis-acting elements indicates that the BjABR1 gene could function in hormone- and stress-related responses, and plant development.
Expression patterns of BjABR1 in response to ABA and abiotic stress in tuber mustard
The expression levels of BjABR1 under abiotic stress conditions were investigated in tuber mustard in a previous study. The expression of BjABR1 were strongly induced at 2 and 6 h after NaCl and Mannitol treatment, respectively, then decreased, and the expression of BjABR1 increased gradually with time under cold stress (Xiang et al., 2014). The expression of BjABR1 was also inducible by ABA. As shown in Fig. 2, the transcripts of BjABR1 increased rapidly and accumulated to the peak at 4 h after ABA treatment, then declined gradually. It is indicated that BjABR1 gene may function in responses to ABA and abiotic stress in tuber mustard.
Alleviative plant sensibility to ABA and abiotic stress in transgenic Arabidopsis compared to wild type
To further investigate the biological functions of BjABR1 gene, the transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing BjABR1 gene were generated. The expression levels of BjABR1 in transgenic lines were examined using qRT-PCR. All transgenic lines constitutively expressed higher levels of BjABR1 transcript compared to the wild-type plants (Fig. 3), and three transgenic lines expressing more BjABR1 transcripts, TL2, TL4, and TL7, were used to the following study.
The transgenic plants under normal MS medium were indistinguishable from the wild-type Arabidopsis (Fig. 4), but they exhibited alleviative plant sensibility to ABA, osmotic stress, and salt stress compared to the wild type (Figs. 4 and 5). Firstly, the seed germination rates of transgenic lines were improved in different levels of ABA and stress conditions (Fig. 5). For example, at one µM ABA, there are about 60% of transgenic seeds germinating and about 40% of wild-type seeds germinating in the second day, and there are more than 90% of transgenic seeds germinating and less than 80% of wild-type seeds germinating in the fifth day. At two µM ABA, there are more than 50% of transgenic seeds germinating and less than 40% of wild-type seeds germinating in the second day, and there are more than 80% of transgenic seeds germinating and less than 70% of wild-type seeds germinating in the fifth day. At 100 mM NaCl, there are more than 60% of transgenic seeds germinating and less than 40% of wild-type seeds germinating in the second day, and there are about 90% of transgenic seeds germinating and about 70% of wild-type seeds germinating in the fifth day. At 200 mM NaCl, there are about 50% of transgenic seeds germinating and about 30% of wild-type seeds germinating in the second day, and there are about 80% of transgenic seeds germinating and less than 70% of wild-type seeds germinating in the fifth day. Similarly, the germination rate of transgenic seeds was greater than that of wild-type seeds on the MS medium with 200 mM or 400 mM mannitol. Secondly, the growth of transgenic seedlings on ABA and stress conditions was comparable to the wild type, showing that the wild-type plants were significantly more inhibited by ABA, osmotic and salt stress compared to the transgenic plants, and the transgenic plants distinctly had more and larger leaves and longer roots compared to WT under the same condition (Fig. 4). It is indicated that BjABR1 gene involved in responses to ABA and abiotic stresses.
Altered expression of stress/ABA-induced genes in transgenic Arabidopsis
To elucidate the molecular mechanism of BjABR1 action during the stress/ABA response, the expression of known stress/ABA-induced genes was analyzed in wild type and transgenic lines following NaCl, mannitol or exogenous ABA application. qRT-PCR analysis was performed to monitor the expression levels of two previously identified stress-inducible genes, RD29B and RD22, and one ABA-inducible gene, ABI3. Under normal growth conditions, transcript levels of RD29B, RD22, and ABI3 were comparable in both wild type and transgenic Arabidopsis (Fig. 6). The transcript levels of RD29B and RD22, however, were significantly higher in the transgenic lines compared to the wild type under salt and mannitol conditions (Figs. 6A and 6B), while activity of ABI3 gene was down-regulated in the transgenic lines (Fig. 6C). The result indicated that alleviative plant sensibility to abiotic stress in transgenic Arabidopsis compared to wild type may be due to the increased expression of the stress-induced genes correlating with stress tolerance. The ABI3 gene product is an important component of ABA signaling pathway (Giraudat et al., 1992) and overexpression of ABI3 in Arabidopsis conferred hypersensitivity to ABA (Lopez-Molina et al., 2002). Therefore, the alleviative plant sensibility of transgenic Arabidopsis to ABA may result from the reduced expression of ABI3 gene in the transgenic Arabidopsis.
Identification and phylogenetic analysis of ABR1 homologous genes
By BLASTP searches against B. juncea database of BRDB using the protein sequence of BjABR1 gene, the gene, named BjuA032667 in B. juncea database, shared the highest amino acid sequence similarity (about 99%) with BjABR1 (Fig. S1). The intron, and promoter sequences of BjABR1 gene cloned by us were also aligned with the corresponding sequences of BjuA032667 gene, respectively, showing that the intron and promoter sequences between the two genes are also highly similar, and there were only four and five nucleotide changes in their intron and promoter sequences, respectively (Fig. S2). It is believed that BjABR1 and BjuA032667 are the same gene and their sequence difference may result from the error of sequencing or PCR amplification, or nucleotide mutation or polymorphism. The BjuA032667 gene instead of BjABR1 was used to the following analysis.
By BLASTP searches against A. thaliana database of BRDB using the protein sequence of AtABR1 (AT5g64750) gene, the alignment score of AT5g64750 gene was 571, while the alignment scores of other genes were all less than 100, so there were no genes that were homologous to AtABR1 except itself in A. thaliana.
By BLASTP searches against B. juncea, B. rapa, B. nigra, and B. napus database of BRDB, and B. oleracea database in Ensembl Plants using the protein sequence of AtABR1 gene, three (named BniB045887-PA, BniB004262-PA, and BniB047045-PA), three (named Scaffold000071.53_Bra037794, Scaffold000004.823_Bra024325, and Scaffold000021.116_Bra031903), three (named Bo9g018330.1, Bo3g100930.1, and Bo2g166380.1), six (named BjuB001787, BjuB007684, BjuA023050, BjuA008665, BjuA008532, and BjuA032667), and five (named GSBRNA2T00079211001, GSBRNA2T00000822001, GSBRNA2T00047471001, GSBRNA2T00086262001, and GSBRNA2T00134741001) ABR1 homologous genes in B. nigra, B. rapa, B. oleracea, B. juncea, and B. napus were identified, respectively.
According to the location data of exons and introns of ABR1 homologous genes from genomic information, all ABR1 homologous genes had one intron (Fig. 7B) except BjuB007684 and GSBRNA2T00134741001 which had two introns (Fig. 8). Comparing the nucleotide sequence of BjuB007684 gene with that of its the closest genes, BniB045887-PA, the results showed that the first intron sequence, the first and second exon sequence of BjuB007684 were highly similar with the intron sequence, the first and second exon sequence of BniB045887-PA, respectively (Fig. S3), while the second intron and third exon sequence of BjuB007684 were highly similar with the partial sequence of the second exon and the downstream sequence of the coding region of BniB045887-PA gene (Fig. S4). Further sequence alignment analysis showed that the termination codon (TGA) was present in BjuB007684 in the same location where the termination codon of BniB045887-PA in (Fig. 8A), indicating that the second intron and the third exon of BjuB007684 may be wrongly annotated. Then, the gene structure and the termination codon of BjuB007684 were corrected as that of BjuB007684_correction according to the nucleotide sequence of BniB045887-PA (Fig. 8A).
Comparing the nucleotide sequence of GSBRNA2T00134741001 gene with that of its the closest genes, Bo9g018330.1, the results showed that the second intron sequence, the second and third exon sequence of GSBRNA2T00134741001 were highly similar with the intron sequence, the first and second exon sequence of Bo9g018330.1, respectively (Fig. S5), while the first exon sequence and first intron sequence of GSBRNA2T00134741001 were highly similar with the upstream sequence of the coding region of Bo9g018330.1 gene (Fig. S6). Further sequence alignment showed that the initiation codon of Bo9g018330.1 gene is ATG, while the corresponding position of GSBRNA2T00134741001 gene was GTG (Figs. S5B and S6B), indicating that nucleotide error in GSBRNA2T00134741001 sequence may be present. Then, the gene structure and the initiation codon of GSBRNA2T00134741001 were corrected as that of GSBRNA2T00134741001_correction according to the nucleotide sequence of Bo9g018330.1 (Fig. 8B).
The amino acid sequences of ABR1 homologous genes of Brassica species and A. thaliana were aligned and the results showed that they shared high sequence similarity, especially the AP2/ERF domain (Fig. 9).
The phylogenetic tree was constructed on the basis of NJ method with a bootstrap value of 1,000 using MEGA5.1. The phylogenetic tree revealed that the ABR1 homologous genes of Brassica species were divided into three groups, group1, group 2, and group3, showed, respectively by red, blue, and green branches in Fig. 7A. Each diploid Brassica species had three ABR1 homologous genes (nine genes in total), and the nine genes were divided into three group and each group contained three genes which belonged, respectively to three diploid Brassica (Fig. 7A), indicating that the ancestor species of three diploid Brassica also had three ABR1 homologous genes which were all then inherited to each diploid Brassica. The genes of B. rapa and B. oleracea, Bo3g100930.1 and Scaffold000004.823_Bra024325, Bo9g018330.1 and Scaffold000071.53_Bra037794, and Bo2g166380.1 and Scaffold000021.116_Bra031903 shared closer relationship compared to BniB004262-PA, BniB045887-PA, and BniB047045-PA of B. nigra, respectively (Fig. 7A), and the amino acid sequence similarity percentage of ABR1 homologous genes between B. rapa and B. oleracea were much greater than that between B. rapa and B. nigra, and between B. oleracea and B. nigra (Fig. 7D), indicating that the ABR1 homologous genes may have experienced more rapid evolution in B. nigra species.
The two allotetraploid Brassica species, B. juncea and B. napus, have six and five ABR1 homologous genes, respectively. B. juncea was originated by hybridization between diploid B. rapa and diploid B. nigra, while B. napus was originated by hybridization between diploid B. rapa and diploid B. oleracea. The phylogenetic tree revealed that B. juncea inherited all the six ABR1 homologous genes from B. rapa and B. nigra with no gene lost, while B. napus inherited all the three ABR1 homologous genes from B. oleracea and two ABR1 homologous genes from B. rapa with one gene (Scaffold000071.53_Bra037794) lost (Fig. 7A). Furthermore, the intron sequences, and upstream and downstream sequence of the coding sequence of the ABR1 homologous genes in the same group were analyzed by pairwise sequence alignment (data not shown) and the results of sequence similarity among these genes were consistent with the gene relationships shown in the phylogenetic tree. Therefore, the evolutionary trajectory of ABR1 homologous genes in Brassica species can be summarized that the ancestor of B. rapa, B. nigra, and B. oleracea had three ABR1 homologous genes, and B. rapa, B. nigra, and B. oleracea inherited all the three ABR1 homologous genes from the ancestor species, respectively, and then, B. juncea inherited all the six ABR1 homologous genes from B. rapa and B. nigra with no gene lost, while B. napus inherited all three ABR1 homologous genes from B. oleracea and two ABR1 homologous genes from B. rapa with one gene lost (Fig. 7C).
Expression analysis of ABR1 homologous genes in tuber mustard
To understand the roles of six ABR1 homologous genes, BjuA008532, BjuA008665, BjuA023050, BjuA032667, BjuB001787, and BjuB007684_correction, in growth and development of tuber mustard, their spatial and temporal expression in roots, stems, leaves before and after the start of stem swelling were examined using semi-quantitative method, respectively. The analysis revealed that the six ABR1 homologous genes possessed different expression models (Fig. 10). BjuA008665, BjuA008532, BjuA032667 were more clearly expressed in samples compared to BjuB001787, BjuA023050, and BjuB007684_correction, while the expression levels of each gene in six samples were different (Fig. 10). For example, BjuA032667 was expressed in all samples, especially in the roots in stem swelling stage (Fig. 10). It is indicated that the ABR1 homologous genes may play a role in different tissues in different growing stages.
Discussion
Many AP2/ERF superfamily genes were characterized to play an important role in the regulation of different development processes and stress responses in plants. In our previous study, we have identified 1,042 differentially expressed genes in stem development in tuber mustard by RNA sequencing, and the expression of Unigene 140028_num2_yongan (Sun et al., 2012) known as BjABR1 gene here between un-swollen stem and swollen stem was significantly different (Sun et al., 2012). We speculated that BjABR1 gene may play an important role in plant growth. Therefore, the full-length cDNA of BjABR1 was cloned later (Xiang et al., 2014), and the function of BjABR1 was further studied in this study.
The protein sequence of BjABR1 gene cloned from tuber mustard was predicted to contain a conserved AP2/ERF domain and it was located in nucleus by onion epidermal subcellular localization analysis, indicating that BjABR1 gene was a potential AP2/ERF transcription factor gene (Xiang et al., 2014). BjABR1 gene hared high amino acid sequence similarity (about 77%) with AtABR1 gene of A. thaliana. The AtABR1 gene of A. thaliana responses to ABA and stress conditions including cold, high salt, and drought, and functions as a repressor of ABA response in Arabidopsis (Pandey et al., 2005). The promoter sequence analysis of BjABR1 gene showed that there were many hormone and stress related cis-acting elements, indicating that BjABR1 may function in hormone and stress responses. Then, the expression analysis of BjABR1 gene showed that it was induced under ABA and stress conditions including cold, high salt, osmotic stress in tuber mustard, and overexpression of BjABR1 gene in Arabidopsis can alleviate plant sensitivity to ABA and abiotic stress, indicating that BjABR1 gene is involved in ABA and abiotic stress signaling. The result was also consistent with hypersensitivity of the abr1 mutant Arabidopsis to ABA and osmotic stress (Pandey et al., 2005), indicating that the function of BjABR1 gene of tuber mustard was similar with that of AtABR1 gene of Arabidopsis, playing a role in responses to ABA as a repressor and abiotic stress. The expression analysis of known stress/ABA-induced genes between wild type and transgenic Arabidopsis under stress/ABA conditions indicated the transcript levels of stress-inducible genes, RD29B and RD22, were improved in transgenic lines, while the expression of the ABA-inducible gene, ABI3, was reduced, indicating that the alleviative plant sensibility of transgenic Arabidopsis to abiotic stress may be due to the increased expression of the stress-induced genes, while the alleviative plant sensibility of transgenic Arabidopsis to ABA may result from the reduced expression of ABA-induced genes.
The genomes of B. juncea have been published recently (Yang et al., 2016). By BLAST search and sequence alignment, the amino acid or nucleotide sequences of BjABR1 gene cloned by us were not the same with its the closed gene BjuA032667 in the B. juncea database, but their sequences were highly similar. Therefore, it is believed that BjABR1 and BjuA032667are the same gene, whose sequence difference may result from the error of sequencing or PCR amplification, or nucleotide mutation or polymorphism.
B. juncea and B. napus were formed by hybridization between B. rapa and B. nigra, and between B. rapa and B. oleracea, respectively. With the availability of genomic data of B. rapa, B. oleracea, B. nigra, B. napus, and B. juncea (Wang et al., 2011b; Liu et al., 2014; Parkin et al., 2014; Chalhoub et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2016), we can analyze the evolution of ABR1 homologous genes in the five Brassica species. Our results found that the B. rapa, B. nigra, and B. oleracea inherited all three ABR1 homologous genes from their ancestor species, respectively, and then, B. juncea inherited all the six ABR1 homologous genes from B. rapa and B. nigra with no gene lost, while B. napus inherited all the three ABR1 homologous genes from B. oleracea and two ABR1 homologous genes from B. rapa with one gene lost, indicating that only a few genes was lost in the evolution of Brassica species. Song et al. (2016) also revealed that B. napus has 515 AP2/ERF genes, about fewer than twice of those in B. rapa (281) or B. oleracea (281), showing likely about 9% gene losses in each subgenome after hybridization. However, the mechanism of gene loss in Brassica species is not clear and needs to be further studied.
The BjABR1 gene of tuber mustard has the similar function in responses to hormone and abiotic stress with AtABR1 gene of Arabidopsis. The evolution analysis showed that the other ABR1 homologous genes of Brassica species had closer relationships with BjABR1 gene compared to AtABR1, indicating that these ABR1 homologous genes may also have the same function in responses to hormone and abiotic stresses.
In this study, we also found that ABR1 homologous genes between B. rapa and B. oleracea shared higher sequence similarity and closer evolution relationship compared to that of B. nigra, indicating that the ABR1 homologous genes had experienced more rapid evolution in B. nigra species. We speculate that B. rapa and B. oleracea shared closely-related evolution relationship compared to B. nigra in the three diploid Brassica species. However, it also needs to be further studied. Moreover, the spatial and temporal expression analysis showed that six ABR1 homologous genes of tuber mustard possessed different expression model, indicating that the ABR1 homologous genes may play a role in different tissues in different growing stages.
Our study exhibits firstly the evolutionary relationships of a class of homologous genes in Brassica species. Our study will help to reveal and understand the mechanisms of Brassica species evolution and the roles of homologous genes in Brassica species.
Conclusions
BjABR1, an AP2/ERF superfamily gene, from tuber mustard (B. juncea var. tumida Tsen et Lee), functioned in phytohormone and abiotic stress responses. Especially, BjABR1 gene can alleviate plant sensitivity to ABA and osmotic stresses, probably due to changes in stress/ABA-induced genes expression. ABR1 homologous genes were identified in Brassica species and they shared high sequence similarity. From the ancestor of diploid Brassica species to allotetraploids, ABR1 homologous genes were all inherited except a loss in B. napus, indicating that ABR1 homologous genes possessed greater hereditary conservation in Brassica species. B. rapa and B. oleracea may share closer relationship among the three diploid species. Moreover, the six ABR1 homologous genes of tuber mustard possessed different spatio-temporal expression models. These results imply that the ABR1 homologous genes in Brassica species may possess similar function in ABA and abiotic stress responses, but play a role in different tissues and growing stages of plant. The study will provide the foundation to the functional research of ABR1 homologous genes in the Brassica species and help to reveal and understand the evolution mechanisms of Brassica species.
Supplemental Information
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology Open Fund (CB2017A12) and the Basic and Advanced Research Project of Chongqing (cstc2014jcyjA80032). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Chaofeng Wu, Email: wucf@cqupt.edu.cn.
Yingfan Cai, Email: yingfancai@outlook.com.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Liuxin Xiang conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.
Chao Liu performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.
Jingzhi Luo authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Lin He authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Yushan Deng prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.
Jie Yuan prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.
Chaofeng Wu conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.
Yingfan Cai conceived and designed the experiments, approved the final draft.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw measurements are provided in the Supplemental Information.
References
- Agarwal et al. (2006).Agarwal PK, Agarwal P, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. Role of DREB transcription factors in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Reports. 2006;25(12):1263–1274. doi: 10.1007/s00299-006-0204-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aukerman & Sakai (2003).Aukerman MJ, Sakai H. Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a microRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell Online. 2003;15(11):2730–2741. doi: 10.1105/tpc.016238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chalhoub et al. (2014).Chalhoub B, Denoeud F, Liu S, Parkin IA, Tang H, Wang X, Chiquet J, Belcram H, Tong C, Samans B, Corréa M, Da Silva C, Just J, Falentin C, Koh CS, Le Clainche I, Bernard M, Bento P, Noel B, Labadie K, Alberti A, Charles M, Arnaud D, Guo H, Daviaud C, Alamery S, Jabbari K, Zhao M, Edger PP, Chelaifa H, Tack D, Lassalle G, Mestiri I, Schnel N, Le Paslier MC, Fan G, Renault V, Bayer PE, Golicz AA, Manoli S, Lee TH, Thi VH, Chalabi S, Hu Q, Fan C, Tollenaere R, Lu Y, Battail C, Shen J, Sidebottom CH, Wang X, Canaguier A, Chauveau A, Bérard A, Deniot G, Guan M, Liu Z, Sun F, Lim YP, Lyons E, Town CD, Bancroft I, Wang X, Meng J, Ma J, Pires JC, King GJ, Brunel D, Delourme R, Renard M, Aury JM, Adams KL, Batley J, Snowdon RJ, Tost J, Edwards D, Zhou Y, Hua W, Sharpe AG, Paterson AH, Guan C, Wincker P. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science. 2014;345(6199):950–953. doi: 10.1126/science.1253435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chandler et al. (2007).Chandler JW, Cole M, Flier A, Grewe B, Werr W. The AP2 transcription factors DORNROSCHEN and DORNROSCHEN-LIKE redundantly control Arabidopsis embryo patterning via interaction with PHAVOLUTA. Development. 2007;134(9):1653–1662. doi: 10.1242/dev.001016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu et al. (2014).Fu M, Kang HK, Son SH, Kim SK, Nam KH. A subset of Arabidopsis RAV transcription factors modulates drought and salt stress responses independent of ABA. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2014;55(11):1892–1904. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giraudat et al. (1992).Giraudat J, Hauge BM, Valon C, Smalle J, Parcy F, Goodman HM. Isolation of the Arabidopsis ABI3 gene by positional cloning. Plant Cell. 1992;4(10):1251–1261. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.10.1251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giri et al. (2014).Giri MK, Swain S, Gautam JK, Singh S, Singh N, Bhattacharjee L, Nandi AK. The Arabidopsis thaliana At4g13040 gene, a unique member of the AP2/EREBP family, is a positive regulator for salicylic acid accumulation and basal defense against bacterial pathogens. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2014;171(10):860–867. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Go et al. (2014).Go YS, Kim H, Kim HJ, Suh MC. Arabidopsis cuticular wax biosynthesis is negatively regulated by the DEWAX gene encoding an AP2/ERF-type transcription factor. Plant Cell. 2014;26(4):1666–1680. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.123307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo et al. (2016).Guo B, Wei Y, Xu R, Lin S, Luan H, Lv C, Zhang X, Song X, Xu R. Genome-wide analysis of APETALA2/Ethylene-responsive factor (AP2/ERF) gene family in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) PLOS ONE. 2016;1(9):e0161322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hong et al. (2009).Hong B, Ma C, Yang Y, Wang T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Gao J. Overexpression of AtDREB1A in chrysanthemum enhances tolerance to heat stress. Plant Molecular Biology. 2009;70(3):231–240. doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9468-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jin et al. (2018).Jin JH, Wang M, Zhang HX, Khan A, Wei AM, Luo DX, Gong ZH. Genome-wide identification of the AP2/ERF transcription factor family in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Genome. 2018;61(9):663–674. doi: 10.1139/gen-2018-0036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kitomi et al. (2011).Kitomi Y, Ito H, Hobo T, Aya K, Kitano H, Inukai Y. The auxin responsive AP2/ERF transcription factor CROWN ROOTLESS5 is involved in crown root initiation in rice through the induction of OsRR1, a type-A response regulator of cytokinin signaling. Plant Journal. 2011;67(3):472–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lata et al. (2014).Lata C, Mishra AK, Muthamilarasan M, Bonthala VS, Khan Y, Prasad M. Genome-wide investigation and expression profiling of AP2/ERF transcription factor superfamily in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) PLOS ONE. 2014;9(11):e113092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li et al. (2017).Li H, Wang Y, Wu M, Li L, Li C, Han Z, Yuan J, Chen C, Song W, Wang C. Genome-wide identification of AP2/ERF transcription factors in cauliflower and expression profiling of the ERF family under salt and drought stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:946. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li et al. (2002).Li XB, Cai L, Cheng NH, Liu JW. Molecular characterization of the cotton GhTUB1 gene that is preferentially expressed in fiber. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2002;130(2):666–674. doi: 10.1104/pp.005538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liao et al. (2016).Liao X, Guo X, Wang Q, Wang Y, Zhao D, Yao L, Wang S, Liu G, Li T. Overexpression of MsDREB6.2 results in cytokinin-deficient developmental phenotypes and enhances drought tolerance in transgenic apple plants. Plant Journal. 2016;89(3):510–526. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Licausi, Ohme-Takagi & Perata (2013).Licausi F, Ohme-Takagi M, Perata P. APETALA2/ethylene responsive factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factors: mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytologist. 2013;199(3):639–649. doi: 10.1111/nph.12291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu et al. (2014).Liu S, Liu Y, Yang X, Tong C, Edwards D, Parkin IA, Zhao M, Ma J, Yu J, Huang S, Wang X, Wang J, Lu K, Fang Z, Bancroft I, Yang TJ, Hu Q, Wang X, Yue Z, Li H, Yang L, Wu J, Zhou Q, Wang W, King GJ, Pires JC, Lu C, Wu Z, Sampath P, Wang Z, Guo H, Pan S, Yang L, Min J, Zhang D, Jin D, Li W, Belcram H, Tu J, Guan M, Qi C, Du D, Li J, Jiang L, Batley J, Sharpe AG, Park BS, Ruperao P, Cheng F, Waminal NE, Huang Y, Dong C, Wang L, Li J, Hu Z, Zhuang M, Huang Y, Huang J, Shi J, Mei D, Liu J, Lee TH, Wang J, Jin H, Li Z, Li X, Zhang J, Xiao L, Zhou Y, Liu Z, Liu X, Qin R, Tang X, Liu W, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Lee J, Kim HH, Denoeud F, Xu X, Liang X, Hua W, Wang X, Wang J, Chalhoub B, Paterson AH. The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes. Nature Communications. 2014;5(1):3930. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu et al. (2013).Liu S, Wang X, Wang H, Xin H, Yang X, Yan J, Li J, Tran LS, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Qin F. Genome-wide analysis of ZmDREB genes and their association with natural variation in drought tolerance at seedling stage of Zea mays L. PlOS Genetics. 2013;9(9):119–129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu & Chen (2007).Liu YG, Chen Y. High-efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR for amplification of unknown flanking sequences. BioTechniques . 2007;43(5):649–656. doi: 10.2144/000112601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lopez-Molina et al. (2002).Lopez-Molina L, Mongrand S, Mclachlin DT, Chait BT, Chua NH. ABI5 acts downstream of ABI3to execute an ABA-dependent growth arrest during germination. Plant Journal. 2002;32(3):317–328. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01430.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matías-Hernández et al. (2014).Matías-Hernández L, Aguilar-Jaramillo AE, Marín-González E, Suárez-López P, Pelaz S. RAV genes: regulation of floral induction and beyond. Annals of Botany. 2014;114(7):1459–1470. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moose & Sisco (1996).Moose SP, Sisco PH. Glossy15, an APETALA2-like gene from maize that regulates leaf epidermal cell identity. Genes and Development. 1996;10(23):3018–3027. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.23.3018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Müller & Munné-Bosch (2015).Müller M, Munné-Bosch S. Ethylene response factors: a key regulatory hub in hormone and stress signaling. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2015;169(1):32–41. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagaharu (1935).Nagaharu U. Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilication. Japanese Journal of Botany. 1935;7:389–452. [Google Scholar]
- Nakano et al. (2006).Nakano T, Suzuki K, Fujimura T, Shinshi H. Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2006;140(2):411–432. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.073783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nie et al. (2018).Nie J, Wen C, Xi L, Lv S, Zhao Q, Kou Y, Ma N, Zhao L, Zhou X. The AP2/ERF transcription factor CmERF053 of chrysanthemum positively regulates shoot branching, lateral root, and drought tolerance. Plant Cell Reports. 2018;37(7):1049–1060. doi: 10.1007/s00299-018-2290-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohmetakagi & Shinshi (1995).Ohmetakagi M, Shinshi H. Ethylene-inducible DNA-binding proteins that interact with an ethylene responsive element. Plant Cell. 1995;7(2):173–182. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.2.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohto et al. (2009).Ohto MA, Floyd SK, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ. Effects of APETALA2 on embryo, endosperm, and seed coat development determine seed size in Arabidopsis. Sexual Plant Reproduction. 2009;22(4):277–289. doi: 10.1007/s00497-009-0116-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pandey et al. (2005).Pandey GK, Grant JJ, Cheong YH, Kim BG, Li LG, Luan S. ABR1, an APETALA2-domain transcription factor that functions as a repressor of ABA response in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2005;39(3):1185–1193. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.066324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parkin et al. (2014).Parkin IA, Koh C, Tang H, Robinson SJ, Kagale S, Clarke WE, Town CD, Nixon J, Krishnakumar V, Bidwell SL, Denoeud F, Belcram H, Links MG, Just J, Clarke C, Bender T, Huebert T, Mason AS, Pires JC, Barker G, Moore J, Walley PG, Manoli S, Batley J, Edwards D, Nelson MN, Wang X, Paterson AH, King G, Bancroft I, Chalhoub B, Sharpe AG. Transcriptome and methylome profiling reveals relics of genome dominance in the mesopolyploid Brassica oleracea. Genome Biology. 2014;15(6):R77. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qin et al. (2007).Qin F, Kakimoto M, Sakuma Y, Maruyama K, Osakabe Y, Tran LS, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Regulation and functional analysis of ZmDREB2A in response to drought and heat stresses in Zea mays L. Plant Journal. 2007;50(1):54–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03034.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sakuma et al. (2002).Sakuma Y, Liu Q, Dubouzet JG, Abe H, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. DNA-binding specificity of the ERF/AP2 domain of Arabidopsis DREBs, transcription factors involved in dehydration- and cold inducible gene expression. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2002;290(3):998–1009. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt et al. (2013).Schmidt R, Mieulet D, Hubberten HM, Obata T, Hoefgen R, Fernie AR, Fisahn J, San Segundo B, Guiderdoni E, Schippers JH, Mueller-Roeber B. SALT-RESPONSIVE ERF1 regulates reactive oxygen species-dependent signaling during the initial response to salt stress in rice. Plant Cell. 2013;25(6):2115–2131. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.113068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song, Li & Hou (2013).Song X, Li Y, Hou X. Genome-wide analysis of the AP2/ERF transcription factor superfamily in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapassp. pekinensis) BMC Genomics. 2013;14(1):573. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song et al. (2016).Song X, Wang J, Ma X, Li Y, Lei T, Wang L, Ge W, Guo D, Wang Z, Li C, Zhao J, Wang X. Origination, expansion, evolutionary trajectory, and expression bias of AP2/ERF superfamily in Brassica napus. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:1186. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun et al. (2012).Sun Q, Zhou G, Cai Y, Fan Y, Zhu X, Liu Y, He X, Shen J, Jiang H, Hu D, Pan Z, Xiang L, He G, Dong D, Yang J. Transcriptome analysis of stem development in the tumourous stem mustard Brassica juncea var. tumida Tsen et Lee by RNA sequencing. BMC Plant Biology. 2012;12(1):53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura et al. (2011).Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2011;28(10):2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thamilarasan et al. (2014).Thamilarasan SK, Park JI, Jung HJ, Nou IS. Genome-wide analysis of the distribution of AP2/ERF transcription factors reveals duplication and CBFsgenes elucidate their potential function in Brassica oleracea. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):422. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, Higgins & Gibson (1994).Thompson J, Higgins D, Gibson T. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research. 1994;22(22):4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang et al. (2016).Wang P, Cheng T, Lu M, Liu G, Li M, Shi J, Lu Y, Laux T, Chen J. Expansion and functional divergence of AP2 group genes in spermatophytes determined by molecular evolution and Arabidopsis mutant analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:1383. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang et al. (2011a).Wang X, Chen X, Liu Y, Gao H, Wang Z, Sun G. CkDREB gene in Caragana korshinskii is involved in the regulation of stress response to multiple abiotic stresses as an AP2/EREBP transcription factor. Molecular Biology Reports. 2011a;38(4):2801–2811. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0425-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang et al. (2011b).Wang X, Wang H, Wang J, Sun R, Wu J, Liu S, Bai Y, Mun JH, Bancroft I, Cheng F, Huang S, Li X, Hua W, Wang J, Wang X, Freeling M, Pires JC, Paterson AH, Chalhoub B, Wang B, Hayward A, Sharpe AG, Park BS, Weisshaar B, Liu B, Li B, Liu B, Tong C, Song C, Duran C, Peng C, Geng C, Koh C, Lin C, Edwards D, Mu D, Shen D, Soumpourou E, Li F, Fraser F, Conant G, Lassalle G, King GJ, Bonnema G, Tang H, Wang H, Belcram H, Zhou H, Hirakawa H, Abe H, Guo H, Wang H, Jin H, Parkin IA, Batley J, Kim JS, Just J, Li J, Xu J, Deng J, Kim JA, Li J, Yu J, Meng J, Wang J, Min J, Poulain J, Wang J, Hatakeyama K, Wu K, Wang L, Fang L, Trick M, Links MG, Zhao M, Jin M, Ramchiary N, Drou N, Berkman PJ, Cai Q, Huang Q, Li R, Tabata S, Cheng S, Zhang S, Zhang S, Huang S, Sato S, Sun S, Kwon SJ, Choi SR, Lee TH, Fan W, Zhao X, Tan X, Xu X, Wang Y, Qiu Y, Yin Y, Li Y, Du Y, Liao Y, Lim Y, Narusaka Y, Wang Y, Wang Z, Li Z, Wang Z, Xiong Z. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Zhang Z. and Brassica rapa Genome Sequencing Project Consortium Nature genetics. 2011b;43:1035–1039. doi: 10.1038/ng.919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warwick, Francis & Al-Shehbaz (2006).Warwick SI, Francis A, Al-Shehbaz IA. Brassicaceae: species checklist and database on CD-Rom. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2006;259(2–4):249–258. doi: 10.1007/s00606-006-0422-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xiang et al. (2014).Xiang L, Xia Y, Cai Y, Fu Y, Wang X, Liu J. Cloning and expression analysis of an AP2/EREBP transcription factor gene BjABR1 in Brassica juncea var. tumida. Acta Horticulturae Sinica. 2014;41(1):89–98. [Google Scholar]
- Yamaguchi-Shinozaki & Shinozaki (1994).Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. A novel cis-acting element in an Arabidopsis gene is involved in responsiveness to drought , low-temperature , or high-salt stress. Plant Cell. 1994;6(2):251–264. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.2.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang et al. (2016).Yang J, Liu D, Wang X, Ji C, Cheng F, Liu B, Hu Z, Chen S, Pental D, Ju Y, Yao P, Li X, Xie K, Zhang J, Wang J, Liu F, Ma W, Shopan J, Zheng H, Mackenzie SA, Zhang M. The genome sequence of allopolyploid Brassica juncea and analysis of differential homoelogene expression influencing selection. Nature Genetics. 2016;48(10):1225–1232. doi: 10.1038/ng.3657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang et al. (2018).Zhang Y, Huang S, Wang X, Liu J, Guo X, Mu J, Tian J, Wang X. Defective apetala2 genes lead to sepal modification in Brassica crops. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;9:367. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw measurements are provided in the Supplemental Information.