Health impacts of parental migration on left-behind children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gracia Fellmeth; Kelly Rose-Clarke; Chenyue Zhao; Laura K Busert; Yunting Zheng; Alessandro Massazza; Hacer Sonmez; Ben Eder; Alice Blewitt; Wachiraya Lertgrai; Miriam Orcutt; Katharina Ricci; Olaa Mohamed-Ahmed; Rachel Burns; Duleeka Knipe; Sally Hargreaves; Therese Hesketh; Charles Opondo; Delan Devakumar

doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32558-3

. 2018 Dec 15;392(10164):2567–2582. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32558-3

Health impacts of parental migration on left-behind children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gracia Fellmeth ^a,^†, Kelly Rose-Clarke ^b,^†, Chenyue Zhao ^c, Laura K Busert ^d, Yunting Zheng ^g, Alessandro Massazza ^e, Hacer Sonmez ⁱ, Ben Eder ^f, Alice Blewitt ^f, Wachiraya Lertgrai ^j, Miriam Orcutt ^f, Katharina Ricci ^k, Olaa Mohamed-Ahmed ^a, Rachel Burns ^f, Duleeka Knipe ^h, Sally Hargreaves ^l,^m, Therese Hesketh ^f,ⁿ, Charles Opondo ^a,^o, Delan Devakumar ^f,^*

PMCID: PMC6294734 PMID: 30528471

Summary

Background

Globally, a growing number of children and adolescents are left behind when parents migrate. We investigated the effect of parental migration on the health of left behind-children and adolescents in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods

For this systematic review and meta-analysis we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsychINFO, Global Index Medicus, Scopus, and Popline from inception to April 27, 2017, without language restrictions, for observational studies investigating the effects of parental migration on nutrition, mental health, unintentional injuries, infectious disease, substance use, unprotected sex, early pregnancy, and abuse in left-behind children (aged 0–19 years) in LMICs. We excluded studies in which less than 50% of participants were aged 0–19 years, the mean or median age of participants was more than 19 years, fewer than 50% of parents had migrated for more than 6 months, or the mean or median duration of migration was less than 6 months. We screened studies using systematic review software and extracted summary estimates from published reports independently. The main outcomes were risk and prevalence of health outcomes, including nutrition (stunting, wasting, underweight, overweight and obesity, low birthweight, and anaemia), mental health (depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, conduct disorders, self-harm, and suicide), unintentional injuries, substance use, abuse, and infectious disease. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) using random-effects models. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42017064871.

Findings

Our search identified 10 284 records, of which 111 studies were included for analysis, including a total of 264 967 children (n=106 167 left-behind children and adolescents; n=158 800 children and adolescents of non-migrant parents). 91 studies were done in China and focused on effects of internal labour migration. Compared with children of non-migrants, left-behind children had increased risk of depression and higher depression scores (RR 1·52 [95% CI 1·27–1·82]; SMD 0·16 [0·10–0·21]), anxiety (RR 1·85 [1·36–2·53]; SMD 0·18 [0·11–0·26]), suicidal ideation (RR 1·70 [1·28–2·26]), conduct disorder (SMD 0·16 [0·04–0·28]), substance use (RR 1·24 [1·00–1·52]), wasting (RR 1·13 [1·02–1·24]) and stunting (RR 1·12 [1·00–1·26]). No differences were identified between left-behind children and children of non-migrants for other nutrition outcomes, unintentional injury, abuse, or diarrhoea. No studies reported outcomes for other infectious diseases, self-harm, unprotected sex, or early pregnancy. Study quality varied across the included studies, with 43% of studies at high or unclear risk of bias across five or more domains.

Interpretation

Parental migration is detrimental to the health of left-behind children and adolescents, with no evidence of any benefit. Policy makers and health-care professionals need to take action to improve the health of these young people.

Funding

Wellcome Trust.

Introduction

Globally, nearly one in seven individuals are migrants. The majority are labour migrants who originate from low-income or middle-income countries (LMICs) and relocate in search of employment opportunities either internationally or internally within a country (eg, from rural to urban settings).¹ Some individuals are forced to migrate because of acute drivers such as conflict and disasters. As a result of migration, especially low-skilled labour migration, children are often left behind in the care of other family members or carers. Among labour migrants, a key incentive for migration is the hope of improving the circumstances of their families and children through increased household income and financial stability. International migrants send an estimated US$613 billion per year in remittances to their countries of origin.² Although the health and rights of migrant workers is recognised as a priority in the UN Sustainable Development Goals,³ the health of children of migrants has been largely overlooked in research and policy.

Research in context.

Evidence before this study

Migration is increasing globally, which has resulted in a growing number of children and adolescents being left behind when their parents migrate. Before starting this study, we searched the scientific literature for articles on the effect of parental migration on child and adolescent health, and found two narrative reviews: one focused on left-behind children in the Philippines and the other on mental health outcomes in left-behind children in China. These reviews suggested that children benefited from the remittances their parents sent home in terms of improved education and reduced child labour, which could result in improved health, but reported that family separation might have long-term psychological and societal costs. We also identified more than 30 studies, mainly from China, investigating the effects of parental migration on a broad range of health outcomes across different countries. On Nov 26, 2018, we did an updated search of MEDLINE for systematic reviews with no date or language restrictions, using the broad search terms “(child* OR adolescent) AND health AND (migration OR left-behind)”. Although we identified 99 systematic reviews, none reviewed the key areas of health of left-behind children and adolescents across all low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Added value of this study

This is the largest and most comprehensive study to date assessing the impact of parental migration on all key areas of child and adolescent health across all LMICs. Compared with children of non-migrants, left-behind children and adolescents had an increased risk of depression, suicidal ideation, and risk of anxiety. Left-behind children also had smaller increases in risk for wasting, stunting, and substance use. These results highlight a rarely discussed consequence of global migration with implications for global policy making and health-care provision in migrant-sending countries. Although a small number of individual studies found positive health effects of parental migration, overall we found no evidence of benefit across any of the health outcomes.

Implications of all the available evidence

Our findings highlight the unmet health needs of left-behind children and adolescents. Research to date has focused primarily on China and longitudinal studies in a wider range of LMICs with high rates of emigration are needed to better understand risk and resilience factors within this population, and to inform policy and practice to address unmet health needs in left-behind children, adolescents, and their carers.

No estimates are available for the number of left-behind children and adolescents globally, but the figure is thought to be in the hundreds of millions. More than a third of all children residing in rural China (61 million) are left behind by one or both migrant parents.⁴ 27% of children in the Philippines,⁵ 36% in Ecuador,⁶ and more than 40% in rural South Africa⁷ are estimated to be left behind.

Evidence about the health status of left-behind children is conflicting. On the one hand, material benefits and greater income security from remittances might be expected to confer improvements in health and facilitate access to health care and education. In Pakistan, migration had positive effects on the growth of left-behind children, with girls benefitting more than boys.⁸ However, on the other hand, some studies suggest poorer health outcomes among left-behind children. In China, where the most research has been done to date, studies have shown poorer nutritional,⁹ developmental¹⁰ and mental health outcomes¹¹ in left-behind children than children of non-migrant parents. It is unclear to what extent the health of these children is affected by parental migration, and how the impact might vary according to contextual factors, including sex and age. For example, in China, boys who were left before age 6 years were not as tall as boys whose parents left them at an older age.¹² Although adolescents might be more independent than younger children, parental absence, and lack of supervision at this crucial age has been associated with risk-taking behaviours, including substance use and physical inactivity, with implications for long-term health.¹³ Furthermore, effects might vary according to the circumstances of parental migration. For example, maternal absence and the absence of both parents might have more pronounced effects on children's health than paternal absence alone.¹⁴ To date, to our knowledge, no studies have comprehensively examined the health status of left-behind children and adolescents across all settings and key areas of health. To address this research gap, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of parental migration on child and adolescent nutrition, mental health, unintentional injuries, infectious disease, substance use, unprotected sex, early pregnancy, and verbal, physical, and sexual abuse in LMICs. We investigated whether parental migration status (one or both parents migrating), type of migration (internal or international; labour or forced) and child characteristics (age, sex) differentially influence the health of left-behind children and adolescents.

Methods

Search strategy and selection criteria

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsychINFO, Global Index Medicus, Scopus, and Popline from database inception to April 27, 2017. Full search terms are provided in the appendix. We searched for observational studies reporting the risk of health outcomes done in LMICs (classified according to the World Bank classification) that included children and adolescents (aged 0–19 years) with at least one migrant parent. We defined parental migration as one or more parent moving away from the place their children are living, for a minimum of 6 months. We included studies in which parents had migrated for any reason, such as employment (labour migrants) or armed conflict or disasters (forced migrants). We included internal and international parental migration, defined as migration within and beyond a country's borders, respectively. The comparator group was children of non-migrating parents. We excluded studies in which less than 50% of participants were aged 0–19 years, the mean or median age of participants was more than 19 years, fewer than 50% of parents had migrated for more than 6 months, or the mean or median duration of migration was less than 6 months.

We updated our searches to include all literature published before Sept 5, 2018, to assess whether studies published after our original search might alter the implications of our findings. We tailored search strategies to each database and used controlled vocabulary and search filters where available, or Boolean search methods and free text terms. No date or language restrictions were used. Because of the large volume of research on left-behind children available in China, we searched the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database and key Chinese public health journals. We also searched reference lists of relevant systematic reviews and grey literature published by key international organisations (UN Children's Fund, International Organization for Migration, and UN High Commissioner for Refugees). The full search strategy is detailed in the appendix. We used Covidence systematic review software (Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) to organise and screen articles. Two reviewers (KR-C, GF, CZ, LKB, YZ, HS, BE, AB, WL, MO, DK, or DD) independently screened each title and abstract and excluded those that were not relevant, and then independently screened the full text of remaining studies to assess eligibility. Two reviewers (GF, CZ, LKB, YZ, AM, HS, BE, RB, WL, MO, KR, or OM-A) extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias for all included studies. Discrepancies about study inclusion were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer or by contacting study authors. Studies that reported results as mean scores with SDs or as raw proportions or unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) were included in meta-analysis. When insufficient data were reported for inclusion in the meta-analysis, we contacted study authors to request further information.

This study is reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines¹⁵ (appendix). The study protocol is available online.

Data analysis

We extracted data on study design, participant numbers and characteristics, and exposures and outcomes using data extraction sheets designed by the authors (appendix). When duplicate data were identified, only data for the most recent timepoint were extracted.

Outcomes of interest were risk and prevalence of the main causes of disability-adjusted life-years for children aged younger than 5 years, 5–9 years, and 10–19 years, including nutrition (stunting, wasting, underweight, overweight and obesity, low birthweight, and anaemia), mental health (depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, conduct disorders, self-harm, and suicide), unintentional injuries, substance use, physical, emotional, and sexual abuse,¹⁶ and infectious disease. Additional outcomes were unprotected sex and early pregnancy (<18 years; appendix).

We summarised outcomes from all studies included in the review diagrammatically, using adjusted estimates to classify studies according to their effect estimates and provide a visual overview of the evidence. Studies with sufficient data to examine the effect of being left behind on nutrition, mental health, injury, and substance use outcomes were included in random-effects meta-analysis. We estimated pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs for binary outcomes and standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Binary categorisations indicate the presence or absence of a disorder (caseness), and continuous outcomes were associated with symptom severity. We used unadjusted study outcomes for three main reasons. First, only 15 studies reported adjusted effect estimates. Second, the adjusted effects estimates varied considerably with regard to the covariates included and effects were not directly comparable. Third, a number of studies reported adjusted ORs; due to the so-called non-collapsibility property of ORs,¹⁷ estimates from adjusted ORs can differ significantly from unadjusted estimates even in the absence of confounding. We used meta-regression to assess the effect of child age and sex on study-specific effect estimates.

Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted version of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale¹⁸ incorporating items from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence Quality Appraisal¹⁹ (appendix). Studies with a high or unclear risk of bias across five or more domains were defined as being at high risk of bias. This definition was based on consensus between the authors, which acknowledged that any such cutoffs are arbitrary.²⁰ No studies were excluded on the basis of quality. Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias.

We used the I² statistic to indicate the proportion of total variation between study estimates due to heterogeneity.²⁰ To identify and assess sources of heterogeneity, we planned a-priori subgroup analyses to assess migration of one versus both parents, and forced versus labour migration. We also planned to do subgroup analyses of internal versus international migration, but due to the predominance of Chinese studies, which were all on internal migration, we decided to do subgroup analyses of studies in China versus the rest of the world. We did a sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of our conclusions with regard to the assumptions underlying our analytic approach. We did fixed-effects meta-analyses and repeated analyses using only studies with low risk of bias. All statistical analyses were done using Stata (version 13.0) and MetaXL (version 5.3). The study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42017064871.

Role of the funding source

The funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the report, or the decision to submit. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Results

Our systematic search of the literature identified 10 284 records, of which 2265 were duplicates (figure 1). Of the 396 full-text articles retrieved, 111 studies⁹^,¹⁰^,¹³^,²¹^,²²^,²³^,²⁴^,²⁵^,²⁶^,²⁷^,²⁸^,²⁹^,³⁰^,³¹^,³²^,³³^,³⁴^,³⁵^,³⁶^,³⁷^,³⁸^,³⁹^,⁴⁰^,⁴¹^,⁴²^,⁴³^,⁴⁴^,⁴⁵^,⁴⁶^,⁴⁷^,⁴⁸^,⁴⁹^,⁵⁰^,⁵¹^,⁵²^,⁵³^,⁵⁴^,⁵⁵^,⁵⁶^,⁵⁷^,⁵⁸^,⁵⁹^,⁶⁰^,⁶¹^,⁶²^,⁶³^,⁶⁴^,⁶⁵^,⁶⁶^,⁶⁷^,⁶⁸^,⁶⁹^,⁷⁰^,⁷¹^,⁷²^,⁷³^,⁷⁴^,⁷⁵^,⁷⁶^,⁷⁷^,⁷⁸^,⁷⁹^,⁸⁰^,⁸¹^,⁸²^,⁸³^,⁸⁴^,⁸⁵^,⁸⁶^,⁸⁷^,⁸⁸^,⁸⁹^,⁹⁰^,⁹¹^,⁹²^,⁹³^,⁹⁴^,⁹⁵^,⁹⁶^,⁹⁷^,⁹⁸^,⁹⁹^,¹⁰⁰^,¹⁰¹^,¹⁰²^,¹⁰³^,¹⁰⁴^,¹⁰⁵^,¹⁰⁶^,¹⁰⁷^,¹⁰⁸^,¹⁰⁹^,¹¹⁰^,¹¹¹^,¹¹²^,¹¹³^,¹¹⁴^,¹¹⁵^,¹¹⁶^,¹¹⁷^,¹¹⁸^,¹¹⁹^,¹²⁰^,¹²¹^,¹²²^,¹²³^,¹²⁴^,¹²⁵^,¹²⁶^,¹²⁷^,¹²⁸ done between 1994 and 2017 in 16 countries (n=106 167 left-behind children and adolescents; n=158 800 children and adolescents of non-migrant parents) were included in the systematic review (appendix). 89 studies (n=78 273 left-behind children and adolescents; n=88 350 children of non-migrant parents) were included in meta-analyses. Reasons for exclusion at the full-text screening stage and characteristics of included studies are shown in the appendix. Of the 111 included studies, 91 (82%) were done in China, 58 (52%) were published in Chinese, nine (8%) were done in Asia (Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, and India), six (5%) in Latin America (Mexico, Guatemala, and Peru), three (3%) in Africa (Ethiopia, Kenya, and Malawi), two (2%) in the Caribbean (Trinidad and Tobago and Jamaica), and two (2%) in eastern Europe (Romania and Moldova). 101 studies were cross-sectional, seven were cohort studies, and three were case-control studies. All studies included children of labour migrants; none included children of forced migrants. All Chinese studies examined internal migration within China, whereas studies from the rest of the world, with the exception of one study,¹⁰⁰ focused on international migration. 71 studies included children aged younger than 10 years. Among the 92 studies that reported participant sex, the proportion of male participants ranged from 13·1% to 76·3%. Study quality varied by domain assessed (figure 2). 48 (43%) of the 111 included studies were at high or unclear risk of bias across five or more domains. Funnel plots showed no evidence of publication bias (appendix).

Study selection

*Some studies included more than one outcome.

Quality assessment of studies included in the systematic review

Scoring was based on an adapted version of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale¹⁸ incorporating items from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence Quality Appraisal. Studies with a high or unclear risk of bias across five or more domains were defined as being at high risk of bias overall.

Of the 111 studies included in the systematic review, mental disorders were the most common study outcome (n=64), followed by nutritional status (n=29), substance use (n=14), experience of violence and abuse (n=7), unintentional injury (n=6), and infectious disease (n=5; figure 3). Across all outcomes, only 12 studies reported a lower risk of adverse health outcomes among left-behind children and adolescents.

Harvest plot of health outcomes among left-behind children and children of non-migrant parents included in the systematic review

Each full-height bar represents the health outcomes reported by an individual study included in the systematic review. Half-height bars represent studies which found varying directionality of health outcomes between different population subgroups (eg, a higher risk among girls who were left behind but no difference among boys who were left behind compared with children of non-migrant parents). Numbers refer to study references as cited in the reference list. Nine studies²³^,²⁴^,³¹^,³²^,⁸⁶^,⁸⁷^,⁹¹^,⁹⁸^,¹²⁴ were excluded from this plot due to the absence of significance testing reported in these studies. Two studies¹⁰⁵^,¹⁰⁹ were included for those outcomes for which significance testing was reported and excluded for other outcomes.

64 of 65 studies reporting mental health outcomes used self-reported screening tools. Meta-analysis showed that left-behind children and adolescents had a significantly higher risk of depression caseness (RR 1·52 [95% CI 1·27–1·82]) and symptoms (SMD 0·16 [95% CI 0·10–0·21]), anxiety caseness (RR 1·85 [1·36–2·53]) and symptoms (SMD 0·18 [0·11–0·26]), and suicidal ideation caseness (RR 1·70 [1·28–2·26]) compared with children of non-migrating parents (figures 4A, figure 4B). Left-behind children and adolescents had a higher risk of symptoms of conduct disorder (SMD 0·16 [95% CI 0·04–0·28]) but not caseness (RR 1·16 [95% CI 0·88–1·52]). Statistical heterogeneity across mental disorder outcomes was high (I²=67·0–96·9%). In subgroup analyses, no differences were identified in risk of anxiety caseness or symptoms among children and adolescents left behind by one parent or by both parents compared with children and adolescents of non-migrant parents (appendix). Children and adolescents left behind by both parents had a higher risk of depressive symptoms than did those of non-migrants (SMD 0·11 [95% CI 0·01 to 0·22]), but no differences were identified between children or adolescents left behind by one parent compared with children or adolescents of non-migrants (0·04 [–0·03 to 0·12]; appendix). No significant differences in depression caseness were identified between children and adolescents left behind by one (RR 0·93 [95% CI 0·74–1·17]) or by both parents (1·13 [0·78–1·64]) when compared with children and adolescents of non-migrant parents (appendix). In studies outside of China, no significant differences in risk of mental disorders were found among children and adolescents of international migrants compared with children of non-migrant parents. With the exception of conduct disorders, the number of studies of children of international migrants done outside of China was limited. Among children of migrants in China (all of whom were internal migrants) risks for all health outcomes were consistent with the results of the main analyses (appendix). Excluding studies at high risk of bias did not alter mental disorder outcomes. Using a fixed-effects model did not significantly alter effect estimates with the exception of conduct disorder caseness (RR 1·45 [95% CI 1·38–1·52]; appendix). We did not include any studies in the meta-analysis reporting outcomes for self-harm.

Forest plots of relative risks or standardised mean differences for health outcomes

Data are presented for mental health binary outcomes (A), mental health continuous outcomes (B), nutrition binary outcomes (C), nutrition continuous outcomes (D), and substance use, abuse and injury outcomes (E). Weights were assigned by random effects analysis. RR=relative risk. SMD=standardised mean difference.

Meta-analyses showed that left-behind children had a significantly increased risk of wasting (RR 1·13 [95% CI 1·02–1·24]) and stunting (RR 1·12 [1·00–1·26]) than children of non-migrants. No differences were identified in mean height-for-age Z score (SMD −0·47 [95% CI −0·95 to 0·01]), mean weight-for-height Z score (SMD −0·02 [–0·09 to 0·05]), mean weight-for-age Z score (SMD −0·32 [–0·69 to 0·05]), risk of being underweight (RR 1·10 [0·88 to 1·38]), risk of being overweight or obese (RR 0·94 [0·74 to 1·19]), or risk of having iron-deficiency anaemia (RR 1·18 [0·91 to 1·54]) between left-behind children and children of non-migrating parents (figure 4C, figure 4D). Heterogeneity varied across nutrition outcomes (I²=0·0–98·1%), with all outcomes (with the exception of wasting and weight-for-height Z score) varying substantially between studies.

Subgroup analyses of wasting for children left behind by one parent and by both parents showed no statistical evidence of an increased risk in left-behind children compared with children of non-migrants (appendix). Subgroup analyses of stunting revealed a significant increase in risk for children left behind by one parent (RR 1·28 [95% CI 1·06–1·55]) and children left behind by both parents (1·26 [1·06–1·50]; appendix) compared with children of non-migrating parents. Among studies done in China, children left behind had a higher risk of stunting than children of non-migrants, but all other nutrition outcomes remained unchanged. Of the studies done outside of China, only three⁶⁷^,⁹³^,¹⁰⁰ reported nutrition outcomes for children who were left behind. Overall no difference was found in nutrition outcomes in studies outside of China, with the exception of wasting and weight-for-height Z scores (appendix). Excluding studies at high risk of bias did not alter nutrition outcomes. Using a fixed-effects model resulted in significantly worse height-for-age Z scores (SMD −0·23 [95% CI −0·29 to −0·17]) and weight-for-age Z scores (−0·19 [–0·25 to −0·12]) among left-behind children than children of non-migrant parents; all other outcomes remained unchanged (appendix).

Left-behind children had a marginally higher risk of substance use (RR 1·24 [95% CI 1·00–1·52]) including alcohol, smoking, and any substance use. No significant differences were identified in risk of unintentional injury (RR 1·32 [95% CI 0·97–1·78]), abuse (RR 1·09 [0·88–1·35]), or diarrhoea (RR 0·97 [0·90–1·05]; figure 4E) between left-behind children and children of non-migrant parents. Statistical heterogeneity was high across these outcomes (I²=82·8–83·1%). Pooled risk for substance use outcomes in studies outside of China and among children left behind by one parent showed no increased risk compared with children of non-migrants; however, each subgroup included only two studies (appendix). When studies at high risk of bias were excluded, no significant differences were identified in risk of substance use among left-behind children compared with children of non-migrant parents. Fixed effects meta-analysis revealed a higher risk of unintentional injury among left-behind children than children of non-migrant parents (RR 1·35 [95% CI 1·21–1·52]; appendix). No studies included in the meta-analysis reported outcomes for infectious disease, with the exception of diarrhoea, or outcomes for unprotected sex or early pregnancy.

Meta-regression showed sex and mean age had no significant effects on any health outcomes (appendix).

Discussion

Although most studies identified by our systematic review focused on internal labour migration in China, our findings suggest that, as a group, left-behind children and adolescents have worse outcomes than children of non-migrant parents, especially with regard to mental health and nutrition. Compared with children of non-migrants, left-behind children and adolescents had a 52% increased risk of depression, 70% increased risk of suicidal ideation, and an 85% increased risk of anxiety. We found smaller increases in risk for wasting (13%), stunting (12%) and substance use (24%). Left-behind children and adolescents had no increased risk of conduct disorders, being overweight or obese, anaemia, unintentional injury, diarrhoea, or abuse. Although a minority of individual studies¹⁰^,⁴²^,⁵⁵^,⁵⁶^,⁷⁸^,⁸⁰^,⁸⁸^,⁹⁵^,¹⁰³^,¹⁰⁷^,¹⁰⁹ reported beneficial health effects, no overall benefits were found across any of the outcomes assessed. We found no studies investigating the effect of forced migration, which might be explained by the fact that leaving children behind in the context of conflict or disaster is unlikely.

We updated our search from April 28, 2017, to Sept 5, 2018, using the same search terms and databases. This updated search identified nine additional papers (six published in English and three published in Chinese), all of which focused on internal migration and were done in China. Findings from the studies were consistent with the results from our meta-analyses and provide no evidence of benefits of parental migration for left-behind children and adolescents and support our overall findings in terms of the negative health impact of migration on left-behind children and adolescents. Four studies reported outcomes for depression: three studies¹²⁹^,¹³⁰^,¹³¹ found a small increase in depressive symptoms or worse depression scores among left-behind children and adolescents and one study¹³² found no difference between left-behind children and children of non-migrant parents. Studies¹²⁹^,¹³³ reporting anxiety outcomes similarly found increased risks among left-behind children and adolescents compared with children of non-migrants. Consistent with our findings, a large study of adolescents in China (n=13 952) found a significant increase in suicide attempts in left-behind adolescents compared with adolescents who were not left behind (3·75% vs 2·86%, p<0·01).¹³⁴ Two studies¹³⁵^,¹³⁶ assessed nutrition outcomes. A cohort study¹³⁵ found that left-behind children and adolescents had lower weight-for-age Z scores and height-for-age Z scores at baseline and follow-up after migration, although the effect of migration varied according to which parent migrated. Li and Zhang¹³⁶ found that a higher proportion of left-behind children had stunting and wasting than did children with non-migrant parents. One study¹³⁷ reported a higher risk of any type of unintentional injury (eg, vehicle and traffic injuries and falls) among left-behind children and adolescents than children and adolescents with non-migrant parents (adjusted OR 1·208, p<0·05).

Labour migration is a global trend, shaping families and communities across the world.¹³⁸ Our findings are consistent with previous reviews⁵^,¹¹ about left-behind children in rural China and the Philippines: although parental labour migration might have economic benefits for families, it might have hidden costs for the health of children and adolescents who are left behind. A previous study¹³⁹ reported that these negative health consequences extend to other family members. The Child Health and Migrant Parents in South-East Asia study¹³⁹ showed that left-behind mothers and other carers in transnational migrant households were more likely to have poor mental health than carers in non-migrant households: mental health problems were associated with infrequent contact with the migrant and migrant destinations in the Middle East, whereas receiving remittances in the past 6 months was found to have a protective effect on the mental health of carers. With the exception of age and sex, we were unable to investigate factors mediating poor health outcomes among left-behind children and adolescents, although family structure, community social capital, living conditions, and level of caregiver supervision might be important.⁶⁸^,¹⁴⁰ Future research should consider the circumstances of parental migration. Children of parents migrating because of extreme poverty, disasters, or oppression are likely to have worse health outcomes than children from wealthier migrant families that are financially stable with access to adequate health care. Residing with siblings and relationships between children and their caregivers could also be important.

82% of studies included in our systematic review were done in China, an upper middle-income country where migration is mainly internal, rural-to-urban labour migration. Our study highlights a major research gap in countries beyond China, potentially limiting the generalisability of our findings to other forms of migration and to other settings, especially low-income countries. Subgroup analyses of studies done across the rest of the world showed no difference in outcomes for left-behind children and adolescents; however, with the exception of conduct disorder, few studies have been done, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn.

Addressing the needs of families who are left behind will be essential for health-care workers and policy makers.¹⁴¹ In China, the health and wellbeing of left-behind children is a priority and steps are being taken to address this. In 2013, the Chinese Government called on local authorities to take specific responsibility for the education and care of left-behind children.¹⁴² The Chinese Women's Federation has taken a lead in most provinces, but action has been inconsistent and it is unclear whether the health of left-behind children is improving as a consequence. Community-based clubs for children have been established to provide left-behind children with educational and recreational opportunities.¹⁴³ Other strategies include conditional cash transfer schemes for caregivers to encourage them to attend health education sessions, vaccinations, and health checks.¹⁴⁴ In China until around 10 years ago, the national household registration system limited rural children's access to urban health and educational services, with children forced to attend designated migrant schools, which varied in quality. The situation is now changing, especially in smaller cities, as a result of the national household registration system restrictions being relaxed, migrant children attending mainstream schools, and using rural health insurance to access health care. These changes have led to an increase in the number of children migrating with their parents.¹⁴⁵

Next steps for research and practice require a multifaceted approach, involving clinical, epidemiological, intervention research, and policy perspectives (panel). Focusing on all levels of society, the International Organization for Migration recommends a multi-dimensional intervention framework that includes the government and business.¹⁴⁶ Clinicians, teachers, and other individuals working with left-behind children and adolescents must be aware of the potential mental health and nutritional needs of this population, and be trained to support and treat them. Increased awareness is particularly important with regard to common mental disorders and risk-taking behaviours that children or adolescents might not present with, or that might be underlying another clinical presentation. Global mental health initiatives should be encouraged to incorporate a focus on left-behind children. However, a one-size-fits-all approach to intervention is likely to be ineffective since left-behind children and adolescents will have different experiences of migration and being left behind. A study in China⁶⁸ found that children who were left behind had more depressive symptoms than children residing in rural China with both parents who had never migrated or been left behind, regardless of whether they had previously migrated or not. However, children who were previously left-behind but were now living with their parents had fewer depressive symptoms than children in rural areas without any experience of migration or being left behind.⁶⁸ Although sex was not a predictor of health outcomes among left-behind children and adolescents in our study, girls and boys might require different intervention approaches. Interventions are also needed to support caregivers, many of whom might be elderly relatives with health needs of their own. Increasing the evidence base beyond China is essential, as are longitudinal studies investigating the long-term effects of parental migration on children and adolescents. Although familial separation is acutely detrimental for health, children might go on to develop resilience and have potentially better health outcomes.

Panel. Next steps and future research.

Clinical

•
Health-care providers should have an increased awareness with regard to mental health and nutritional disorders when dealing with left-behind children and adolescents. More focus should be placed on research to better understand the health needs of this group in a range of countries globally.

Epidemiology

•
Increase in the evidence base and available data to understand the short-term and long-term health consequences of migration on left-behind children, with a particular focus on internal migration outside of China and international migration, elucidating the mechanisms by which being left behind might lead to improvements or worsening health. To do this, more work is needed on the moderating and mediating factors—for example, the number of parents migrating, the type and duration of migration, the degree of contact with parents, or age of the children and the differing family situations, including alternate family structures.

Intervention research

•
Moving beyond understanding the problem, interventions are needed to improve the health or to mitigate the adverse effects of being left behind. This might involve community actions, laws, or technology to improve the connectedness of families. Research is particularly needed on interventions at an individual or community level to promote resilience and enable young people to overcome the negative aspects of parental absence due to migration.

Policy

•
Both global and national policies need to consider the health needs of children who are left behind. Research is needed to identify and implement national policies to provide services for children who might not have parental support. Globally, policies for migrant workers should consider the impact on their families. Migrant workers must be allowed the time to visit and communicate with their families. Global mental health initiatives need to better consider this excluded group.

The comprehensive scope of this review is a strength, since evidence was included across all LMICs, in all languages, across multiple health outcomes, with low publication bias. However, our study has several limitations. Our original systematic search included literature published up to April, 2017, and thus newer studies might alter the conclusions. However, when updating the searches to September, 2018, the studies were consistent with our findings. Statistical heterogeneity was high in the meta-analyses, which persisted in subgroup analyses and meta-regression. This heterogeneity suggests that, despite our use of a strict definition of left-behind children and adolescents, other mediating or moderating factors might influence the results reported in individual studies, including caregiver and contextual factors. Similarly high heterogeneity was identified in a systematic review and meta-analysis¹⁴⁷ of mental disorders among refugees resettled in western countries. Most of the studies included in our systematic review and meta-analysis were from China, focused on internal migration, and were cross-sectional, which means temporal causal inference is limited and might not generalise beyond China. Despite these limitations, our study defines and identifies a global population of young people at risk.

In summary, left-behind children and adolescents have substantial unmet mental health and nutritional needs that have not been well described outside of China. The prevalence of labour migration is increasing, thus interventions that support these young people are urgently needed to prevent long-term negative effects on their health and development.

Acknowledgments

We thank the funder of the study, the Wellcome Trust (209993/Z/17/Z). We thank Heather Chesters for her advice on the database search strategies and Henry Aughterson for help with the initial reviews.

Contributors

KR-C, DD, GF, DK, and TH conceptualised the study and developed the protocol. KR-C, BE, DD, and DK developed the search strategy. BE did the literature search. KR-C, GF, CZ, LKB, YZ, HS, BE, AB, WL, MO, DK, and DD screened titles, abstracts and full texts. GF, CZ, LKB, YZ, AM, HS, BE, RB, WL, MO, KR, and OM-A extracted data and assessed data quality. GF and CO analysed the data. GF, LKB, AM, HS, DK, RB, CO, KR-C, and DD interpreted the data. GF, KR-C, LKB, SH, and DD wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of interests

SH is a senior editor at The Lancet Infectious Diseases. SH is funded by the Wellcome Trust and the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) through an ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Travellers and Migrants research grant. DK receives salary support from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC); Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research, University of Bristol; and the Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund. DD receives salary support from the National Institute for Health Research. TH reports an ESRC grant for an intervention for Left Behind Children in China (ES/L003619/1). MO is in receipt of an ESRC doctoral fellowship. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary appendix

mmc1.pdf^{(3MB, pdf)}

References

1.International Organization for Migration . International Organization for Migration; Geneva: 2018. World Migration Report. [Google Scholar]
2.World Bank Group . World Bank; Washington DC: 2018. Migration and remittances. Recent developments and outlook-transit migration. [Google Scholar]
3.UN Sustainable Development Goals. 2018. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
4.Yuan P, Wang L. Migrant workers: China boom leaves children behind. Nature. 2016;529:25. doi: 10.1038/529025a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Reyes MM. UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund); New York: 2008. Migration and Filipino children left-behind: a literature review. [Google Scholar]
6.UN Population Fund and Facultad Lationamericana de Ciencias Sociales . UN Population Fund and Facultad Lationamericana de Ciencias Sociales; Quito: 2006. Ecuador: las Cifras de la migracion internacional. [Google Scholar]
7.Whitehead A, Hashim I. Children and migration. Background paper for DFID migration team. 2005. https://childhub.org/en/system/tdf/library/attachments/dfid_05_child_mig_bac_0408.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=18153
8.Mansuri G. Migration, sex bias, and child growth in rural Pakistan. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2006. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/8423/wps3946.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
9.Ban L, Guo S, Scherpbier RW, Wang X, Zhou H, Tata LJ. Child feeding and stunting prevalence in left-behind children: a descriptive analysis of data from a central and western Chinese population. Int J Public Health. 2017;62:143–151. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0844-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Wen M, Lin D. Child development in rural China: children left behind by their migrant parents and children of nonmigrant families. Child Dev. 2012;83:120–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Qin J, Albin B. The mental health of children left behind in rural China by migrating parents: a literature review. J Public Ment Health. 2013;9:4–16. [Google Scholar]
12.Zhang N, Becares L, Chandola T. Does the timing of parental migration matter for child growth? A life course study on left-behind children in rural China. BMC Public Health. 2015;2015:966. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2296-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Gao Y, Li LP, Kim JH, Congdon N, Lau J, Griffiths S. The impact of parental migration on health status and health behaviours among left behind adolescent school children in China. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Liu Z, Xinying L, Ge X. Left too early: the effects of age at separation from parents on Chinese rural children's symptoms of anxiety and depression. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:2049–2054. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.150474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Kyu HH, Pinho C, Wagner JA. Global and national burden of diseases and injuries among children and adolescents between 1990 and 2013: findings from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 Study. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:267–287. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Hernan MA, Clayton D, Keiding N. The Simpson's paradox unraveled. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:780–785. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Wells G, Shea S, O'Connell D. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
19.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Appendix G. Quality appraisal checklist–quantitative studies reporting correlations and associations. 2012. https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg4/chapter/appendix-g-quality-appraisal-checklist-quantitative-studies-reporting-correlations-and
20.Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Wiley-Blackwell; Oxford: 2011. [Google Scholar]
21.Adhikari R, Jampaklay A, Chamratrithirong A, Richter K, Pattaravanich U, Vapattanawong P. The impact of parental migration on the mental health of children left behind. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16:781–789. doi: 10.1007/s10903-013-9809-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Aguilera-Guzman RM, Garcia MS, Garcia FJ. Psychometric characteristics of CES-D in a sample of Mexican rural adolescents in areas with a strong migratory tradition. Salud Mental. 2004;27:57–66. [Google Scholar]
23.Asis MM, Ruiz-Marave C. Leaving a legacy: parental migration and school outcomes among young children in the Philippines. Asian Pac Migr J. 2013;22:349–376. doi: 10.1177/011719681302200303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Battistella G, Conaco CG. The impact of labour migration on the children left behind: a study of elementary school children in the Philippines. SOJOURN. 1998;13:220–241. [Google Scholar]
25.Bi C, Oyserman D. Left behind or moving forward? Effects of possible selves and strategies to attain them among rural Chinese children. J Adolesc. 2015;44:245–258. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Chen M, Chan KL. Parental absence, child victimization, and psychological well-being in rural China. Child Abuse Negl. 2016;59:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Cheng SG, Hao JH, Tao FB. Mental health status of left-behind adolescents in rural areas in Anhui. Zhongguo Xue Xiao Wei Sheng. 2008;29:429–441. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
28.Deng ZX, Li GY. Relationship between suicidal ideation and parental out-migration for work among left-behind children aged 14 years or younger in Guizhou province. Zhong Guo Gong Gong Wei Sheng. 2014;30:1154–1156. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
29.Fan F, Su L, Gill MK, Birmaher B. Emotional and behavioral problems of Chinese left-behind children: a preliminary study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010;45:655–664. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0107-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Feng L. Investigation and comparison of psychological and behavioral characteristics of rural left-behind children and non-left-behind children and the intervention countermeasures. Zhong Guo Fu You Bao Jian. 2014;29:2027–2029. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
31.Gao Y. A comparative study on mental development characteristics between non-parent-absent children and parent-absent children in different care-taking modes. Zhong Guo Te Shu Jiao Yu. 2008;97:56–61. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
32.Ge J, Luo S. The study of rural left-behind children's psychological anxiety. Xian Dai Jiao Yu Ke Xue. 2011;1:72–74. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
33.Graham E, Jordan LP. Migrant parents and the psychological well-being of left-behind children in southeast Asia. J Marriage Fam. 2011;73:763–787. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00844.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Guo J, Chen L, Wang X. The relationship between internet addiction and depression among migrant children and left-behind children in China. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012;15:585–590. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Guo J, Ren X, Wang X. Depression among migrant and left-behind children in China in relation to the quality of parent-child and teacher-child relationships. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.He B, Fan J, Liu N. Depression risk of ‘left-behind children’ in rural China. Psychiatry Res. 2012;200:306–312. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Hou K, Liu Y, Qu Z, Jiang S. The social adjustment of left-behind children in rural China: a propensity score analysis. Xin Li Fa Zhan Yu Jiao Yu. 2014;30:646–655. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
38.Hu HW, Lu S, Huang CC. The psychological and behavioral outcomes of migrant and left-behind children in China. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;46:1–10. [Google Scholar]
39.Jiang Q. Emotional and behavioral problems among left-behind middle school children in Fujian province. Zhong Guo Gong Gong Wei Sheng. 2013;12:015. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
40.Jin YL, Wu XJ, Huang SP, Zhao HS, Sun GX, Xu JC. Comparative analysis on the mental health status of rural left-behind children in northern Jiangsu province. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2009;30:472–473. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
41.Jones A, Sharpe J, Sogren M. Children's experiences of separation from parents as a consequence of migration. CJSW. 2004;3:89–109. [Google Scholar]
42.Lan YL, Li Y, Tan XJ, Zhang YY, Tan JY. Personality and emotion and behavior status of children left behind in rural areas. Zhong Hua Xing Wei Yi Xue Yu Nao Ke Xue. 2009;18:343–345. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
43.Li XY, Tang JL, Wu D, Xu WM, Yang L, Jin L. Study on behavioral problems among 5,973 middle-school students in an area. Anhui Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2008;43:108–110. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
44.Li GY, Tao FB. Survey on mental health status and suicidal ideation among rural children left-behind. Chin J Publ Health. 2009;25:905–907. [Google Scholar]
45.Liao ZG, Chen ZH, Wang SH, Xi BR, Liu H, He SJ. Study and comparison of behavioral problems of left-behind children and non-left behind children in rural area of Jiangxi province. Zhong Guo Fu You Bao Jian. 2013;28:4501–4503. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
46.Ling H, Fu E, Zhang JR. Effects of separation age and separation duration among left-behind children in China. Soc Behav Pers. 2015;43:241–254. [Google Scholar]
47.Liu XH, Yang YY, Ha LN, Wang X, Li Q, Dai X. Relationship between emotional problem behavior and social support in left-behind children. Zhong Guo Quan Ke Yi Xue. 2012;28:3287–3290. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
48.Pottinger AM. Children's experience of loss by parental migration in inner-city Jamaica. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2005;75:485–496. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.75.4.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Qiao L, Chen XN, Yuan P. Status of mental health of the left-behind children in certain regions of Sichuan. Xian Dai Yu Fang Yi Xue. 2008;16:3108–3111. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
50.Qu Y, Jiang H, Zhang N, Wang D, Guo L. Prevalence of mental disorders in 6-16-year-old students in Sichuan province, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:5090–5107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120505090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Ren Q, Treiman DJ. The consequences of parental labor migration in China for children's emotional wellbeing. Soc Sci Res. 2016;58:46–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Shen M, Gao J, Liang Z, Wang Y, Du Y, Stallones L. Parental migration patterns and risk of depression and anxiety disorder among rural children aged 10–18 years in China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007802. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Shi J, Chen Z, Yin F, Zhao J, Zhao X, Yao Y. Resilience as moderator of the relationship between left-behind experience and mental health of Chinese adolescents. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2016;62:386–393. doi: 10.1177/0020764016636910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Shi YJ, Bai Y, Shen YN, Kenny K, Rozelle S. Effects of parental migration on mental health of left-behind children: evidence from Northwestern China. China World Econ. 2016;24:105–122. [Google Scholar]
55.Sun XJ, Tian Y, Zhang YX, Xie XC, Heath MA, Zhou Z. Psychological development and educational problems of left-behind children in rural China. SPI. 2015;36:227–252. [Google Scholar]
56.Tao S, Yu L, Gao W, Xue W. Food preferences, personality and parental rearing styles: analysis of factors influencing health of left-behind children. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:2921–2929. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1317-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Tomsa R, Jenaro C. Children left behind in Romania: anxiety and predictor variables. Psychol Rep. 2015;116:485–512. doi: 10.2466/10.17.PR0.116k19w1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Vanore M, Mazzucato V, Siegel M. ‘Left behind’ but not left alone: parental migration & the psychosocial health of children in Moldova. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:252–260. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Wan YM, Wang SF, Ma XH. Mental health condition of the left-behind children in rural area of Anhui province. Zhongguo Xue Xiao Wei Sheng. 2009;10:911–912. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
60.Wang XD, Chen X. A comparative study of social anxiety and cognitive deviation between home-staying and non-home-staying children. Sichuan Shi Fan Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010;37:57–61. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
61.Wang TZ, Chen MC, Sun YH. Research on children's depression and the influence of left-behind status in rural area. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2011;32:1445–1447. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
62.Wang SM, Deng DH, Zhou ZH. Mental health of the left-behind children in different types in rural Hanchuan. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2010;6:005. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
63.Wang RX, Zhu LQ, Niu SX. Investigation on mental health of left-behind primary and secondary school students in northern remote rural of Hebei Province. Jilin Da Xue Xue Bao. 2012;6:065. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
64.Wang LF, Zhang S, Sun YH. Social anxiety and the influencing factors among pupils in rural areas in Anhui. Zhongguo Xue Xiao Wei Sheng. 2006;10:014. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
65.Wang W, Zhao HW, Guo Y, Duan ZY. Study on the mental health status and the influencing factors of left-behind children in rural areas. Xian Dai Yu Fang Yi Xue. 2014;41:994–999. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
66.Wei J, Zheng H. Negative influence of the absence of parental rearing among middle school students left in rural areas. Zhong Guo Xin Li Wei Sheng. 2007;21:83. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
67.Wickramage K, Siriwardhana C, Vidanapathirana P. Risk of mental health and nutritional problems for left-behind children of international labor migrants. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:39. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0412-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Wu Q, Lu D, Kang M. Social capital and the mental health of children in rural China with different experiences of parental migration. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:270–277. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69.Wu YL, Zhao X, Li YF. The risk and protective factors in the development of childhood social anxiety symptoms among Chinese children. Psychiatry Res. 2016;240:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.08.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70.Xie QH, Yang YP, Zhong L. Mental health status of rural left-behind children in Sinan county, Guizhou province. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2011;32:468–469. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
71.Xu HW, Xie Y. The causal effects of rural-to-urban migration on children's well-being in China. Eur Sociol Rev. 2015;31:502–519. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcv009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72.Yang YJ, Tao FB, Wan YH. Depressive symptoms and the influencing factors among left-behind children. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2010;3:321–323. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
73.Yang XM, Wu YW. A survey on the mental health status of rural left-behind children in Gansu. Zhong Guo Fu You Bao Jian. 2011;26:2165–2167. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
74.Yao YS, Kang YW, Jin YL. A prevalence survey on the mental health of left behind adolescents in Anhui province. Zhong Hua Liu Xing Bing Xue. 2010;31:1359–1362. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75.Zhang L, Luo XR, Li FF. Behavior problems in left-behind children living in rural areas of Changzhi City. Zhong Hua Jian Kang Guan Li Xue. 2011;5:50–53. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
76.Zhang JP. Analysis on the assessment results of family cohesion and adaptability of left-behind children. Qian Yan. 2012;15:126–128. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
77.Zhang YL. Investigation on the mental health status of rural left-behind children. Jiao Yu Xue Shu Yue Kan. 2013;2013:83–90. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
78.Zhao JX, Liu X. Rural left-home-children's depression and antisocial behavior: the protective role of daily pleasures. Xin Li Fa Zhan Yu Jiao Yu. 2010;6:013. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
79.Zhao M, Li H, Li J. Study on the influence of migrant parents on mental health of their left-behind children in rural China. Zhong Guo Wei Sheng Shi Ye Guan Li. 2012;283:60–63. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
80.Zhao X, Chen J, Chen MC, Lv XL, Jiang YH, Sun YH. Left-behind children in rural China experience higher levels of anxiety and poorer living conditions. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:665–670. doi: 10.1111/apa.12602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81.Zhao C, Wang F, Li L, Zhou X, Hesketh T. Long-term impacts of parental migration on Chinese children's psychosocial well-being: mitigating and exacerbating factors. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017;52:669–677. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1386-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82.Zhou JY, Luo XR, Wei Z. Characteristics of behavioral and emotional problems of left-behind children in rural areas of Changsha. Shi Yong Er Ke Lin Chuang Za Zhi. 2009;24:1901–1903. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
83.Zhou Z, Wang J. Analysis on the depression symptoms and associated factors in rural primary and middle school students. Anhui Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2011;46:976–978. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
84.Zhu Y, Wang F, Li FH. Health condition of left-behind children in Dingxi county of Guizhou province. Zhong Guo Gong Gong Wei Sheng. 2012;4:45. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
85.Chen ZY. The health status of the left-behind children in rural China. Zhong Guo Ren Kou Ke Xue. 2009;5:11. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
86.Chen L, Wang XH, Qu ZY. An analysis of the growth and nutritional status of migrant children and left-at-home children. Zhong Guo Te Shu Jiao Yu. 2010;122:48–54. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
87.Chen C, He W, Wang Y, Deng L, Jia F. Nutritional status of children during and post-global economic crisis in China. Biomed Environ Sci. 2011;24:321–328. doi: 10.3967/0895-3988.2011.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88.Chen JY, Zhou H, Cao X, Zhou HY, Zhang S, Ma Y. Analysis on growth status of children in Ziyang, Sichuan province. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2012;33:236–237. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
89.Chen SH, Liao ZG, He SJ. Analysis on the nutritional status of unattended children under 7 years in rural area of Jiangxi province. Zhong Guo Fu You Bao Jian. 2013;28:68–70. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
90.Davis J, Brazil N. Migration, remittances and nutrition outcomes of left-behind children: a national-level quantitative assessment of Guatemala. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0152089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91.Feng H, Zhang Y, Xian Y, Li Y. Analysis on the physical growth and nutrition status of children under 7 years old in Guizhou. Zhong Guo Fu You Bao Jian. 2010;25:2407–2409. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
92.Frank R. International migration and infant health in Mexico. J Immigr Health. 2005;7:11–22. doi: 10.1007/s10903-005-1386-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93.Graham E, Jordan LP. Does having a migrant parent reduce the risk of undernutrition for children who stay behind in south-east Asia? Asian Pac Migr J. 2013;22:315–348. doi: 10.1177/011719681302200302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94.Li CM, Yang N, Zhang JN. Investigation of physical development among left-behind children in rural areas in western Hunan province. Zhong Guo Quan Ke Yi Xue. 2011;9:26. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
95.Lu Y. Internal migration, international migration, and physical growth of left-behind children: a study of two settings. Health Place. 2015;36:118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96.Mo X, Xu L, Luo H, Wang X, Zhang F, Gai Tobe R. Do different parenting patterns impact the health and physical growth of ‘left-behind’ preschool-aged children? A cross-sectional study in rural China. Eur J Public Health. 2016;26:18–23. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97.Mou JS, Luo JY, Li YP, Shuai ZR, Liu XH. Study on the nutritional status and determinants among rural stranded children in China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2009;30:439–443. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98.Mu R, de Brauw A. Migration and young child nutrition: evidence from rural China. J Popul Econ. 2015;28:631–657. [Google Scholar]
99.Nguyen CV. Does parental migration really benefit left-behind children? Comparative evidence from Ethiopia, India, Peru and Vietnam. Soc Sci Med. 2016;153:230–239. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100.Onyango A, Tucker K, Eisemon T. Household headship and child nutrition: a case study in western Kenya. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39:1633–1639. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101.Pan CM, Chen XR. Growth and nutritional status among rural left-behind children. Zhong Guo Gong Gong Wei Sheng. 2014;6:004. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
102.Schmeer KK. Family structure and child anemia in Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 2013;95:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103.Wang YJ, He BY, Fang LH, Li HJ. Preliminary study on the health status among the “left-behind” children in the Xiantao rural area of Hubei Province. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2011;13:977–980. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
104.Wen YF, Wang JQ, Liu RQ. Study on the health condition of the ‘left behind’ children in rural areas of south Anhui province. Xian Dai Yu Fang Yi Xue. 2008;4:038. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
105.Xia YQ, Qing ZG, Su SH, Liu GH, Tang J. Physical growth and nutrition status among left-behind students in Guangdong. Zhongguo Xue Xiao Wei Sheng. 2011;32:1521–1522. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
106.Xie Q, Long H, Shen XH, Tang WJ, Xie LX, Huang YC. Study on the food intake and medium and severe malnutrition in poor rural primary students in Guangxi. Zhongguo Xue Xiao Wei Sheng. 2013;34:979–980. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
107.Yan MH, Wang JS, Xin ZH. Investigation and research on physical health of the left-behind and the non left-behind children in north Jiangsu. Anhui Nong Ye Ke Xue. 2013;41:359–361. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
108.Yu D, Liu A, Yu W. Malnutrition status and influencing factors in children with migrant worker mothers in poor areas in China. Wei sheng yan jiu. 2013;42:429–432. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
109.Zhou C, Sylvia S, Zhang L. China's left-behind children: impact of parental migration on health, nutrition, and educational outcomes. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015;34:1964–1971. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
110.Gao Y, Li L, Chan EY, Lau J, Griffiths SM. Parental migration, self-efficacy and cigarette smoking among rural adolescents in south China. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
111.Jiang S, Chu J, Li C. Alcohol consumption is higher among left-behind Chinese children whose parents leave rural areas to work. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104:1298–1304. doi: 10.1111/apa.13163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
112.Jin CC, Qu ZY, Wang XH. The characteristics and influence factors of smoking behavior of migrated children and unattended children. Zhong Guo Te Shu Jiao Yu. 2009;113:70–74. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
113.Jordan LP, Graham E, Vinh ND. Alcohol use among very early adolescents in Vietnam: what difference does parental migration make? Asian Pac Migr J. 2013;22:401–419. doi: 10.1177/011719681302200305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
114.Li GY, Luo TM, Tao FB. Effects of parental working out-of-home on health risk behavior and psychological status among left-behind children. Zhong Guo Gong Gong Wei Sheng. 2012;7:16–21. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
115.Lin D, Xu Y, Li X, Fan X. On the risk to and the future trend of the family environment and their relationship with rural children's smoking behavior. Zhong Guo Te Shu Jiao Yu. 2011;131:74–79. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
116.Sukamdi, Wattie AM. Tobacco use and exposure among children in migrant and non-migrant households in Java, Indonesia. Asian Pac Migr J. 2013;22:447–464. doi: 10.1177/011719681302200307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
117.Yang TT, Li C, Zhou C. Parental migration and smoking behavior on left-behind children: evidence from a survey in rural Anhui, China. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:127. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0416-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
118.Zhang F, Zhang T, Xiong J, Zhang L, Chen J. Analysis on prevalence and influence factors of smoking and drinking among middle school students of Tujia and Miao in Xiangxi Area. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2015;44:750–755. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
119.Carling J, Tonnessen M. Fathers' whereabouts and children's welfare in Malawi. Dev South Afr. 2013;30:724–742. [Google Scholar]
120.Schmeer K. Father absence due to migration and child illness in rural Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1281–1286. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
121.Wang Z, Zhang JY, Chen J, Tan L, Fan H, Gan HP. Analysis of prevalence status and influence factors of diarrhea among children under 5 years in rural areas of Sichuan province. Xian Dai Yu Fang Yi Xue. 2012;39:4069–4075. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
122.Liu CY, Zhong ZH, Pan JP. Analysis on the current situation of neglected rural children aged 0–6 years and its impact factors in the western areas of China. Zhong Hua Liu Xing Bing Xue. 2012;33:145–149. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
123.Wang JX. Investigation on safe sex issues among adolescent left-behind children. Qing Nian Yan Jiu. 2008;2008:7–14. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
124.Chen L, Qu ZY. Character and impact factors of injuries among left-behind children and migrant children. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2010;31:332–334. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
125.Jiang W, Huang H, Wei J, Shi H, Zhu W, Zhang D. Epidemiological investigation on unintentional injuries of left-behind children in rural area of Nanning. Zhong Guo Fu You Bao Jian. 2011;26:563–565. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
126.Shen M, Yang S, Han J. Non-fatal injury rates among the “left-behind children” of rural China. Inj Prev. 2009;15:244–247. doi: 10.1136/ip.2008.019869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
127.Shen M, Wang Y, Yang S, Du Y, Xiang H, Stallones L. Agricultural exposures and farm-related injuries among adolescents in rural China. Inj Prev. 2013;19:214–217. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
128.Zhao KF, Su H, Fang XH. Study on the distribution and risk factors of injuries among home-stranded children in rural areas of Anhui province. Zhong Hua Liu Xing Bing Xue. 2008;29:338–342. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
129.Man Y, Mengmeng L, Lezhi L, Ting M, Jingping Z. The psychological problems and related influential factors of left-behind adolescents (LBA) in Hunan, China: a cross sectional study. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16:163. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0639-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
130.Zhou M, Sun X, Huang L. Parental migration and left-behind children's depressive symptoms: estimation based on a nationally-representative panel dataset. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:1069. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
131.Tang W, Wang G, Hu T. Mental health and psychosocial problems among Chinese left-behind children: a cross-sectional comparative study. J Affect Disord. 2018;241:133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
132.Wang XQ, Huo JY, Zhang DJ, Liu PJ. The relationship between mental health and child abuse and the difference between left-at-home children and those living with their parents in rural areas: an analysis based on the two-dimensional four-fact mental health structure. Zhong Guo Te Shu Jiao Yu. 2018;211:58–64. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
133.Li GY, Ran Y. Investigation into the social anxiety of left-behind children under 14 living alone in Guizhou province. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2018;39:1176–1178. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
134.Chang H, Yan Q, Tang L. A comparative analysis of suicide attempts in left-behind children and non-left-behind children in rural China. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
135.Tian X, Ding C, Shen C, Wang H. Does parental migration have negative impact on the growth of left-behind children? New evidence from longitudinal data in rural China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:E1308. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
136.Li P, Zhang TC. Comparison of nutritional status between Han and Yao ethnic left-behind children aged 7–14 years in rural Yongzhou. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2018;39:364–371. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
137.Hu H, Gao J, Jiang H. A comparative study of behavior problems among left-behind children, migrant children and local children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:655. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
138.Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS. Our future: a Lancet Commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet. 2016;387:2423–2478. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00579-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
139.Graham E, Jordan LP, Yeoh BS. Parental migration and the mental health of those who stay behind to care for children in south-east Asia. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
140.Mazzucato V, Cebotari V, Veale A, White A, Grassi M, Vivet J. International parental migration and the psychological well-being of children in Ghana, Nigeria, and Angola. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:215–224. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
141.Abubakar I, Aldridge RW, Devakumar D. The UCL-Lancet Commission on Migration and Health: the health of a world on the move. Lancet. 2018 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32114-7. published online Dec 5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
142.Government of China Announcement on the care and education for rural school aged left-behind children by Ministry of Education and four other agencies. 2013. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-01/10/content_2309058.htm
143.Zhao C, Zhou X, Wang F, Jiang M, Hesketh T. Care for left-behind children in rural China: a realist evaluation of a community-based intervention. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;82:239–245. [Google Scholar]
144.Zhang Y, Ji M, Zou J. Effect of a conditional cash transfer program on nutritional knowledge and food practices among caregivers of 3-5-year-old left-behind children in the rural Hunan Province. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:525. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
145.National Bureau of Statistics of China. UNICEF China. UNFPA China Population status of children in China in 2015: facts and figures. 2017. http://www.unicef.cn/en/uploadfile/2017/1009/20171009112814506.pdf
146.International Organization for Migration Health of families left behind. https://www.iom.int/health-families-left-behind
147.Fazel M, Wheeler J, Danesh J. Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in western countries: a systematic review. Lancet. 2005;365:1309–1314. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary appendix

mmc1.pdf^{(3MB, pdf)}

[bib1] 1.International Organization for Migration . International Organization for Migration; Geneva: 2018. World Migration Report. [Google Scholar]

[bib2] 2.World Bank Group . World Bank; Washington DC: 2018. Migration and remittances. Recent developments and outlook-transit migration. [Google Scholar]

[bib3] 3.UN Sustainable Development Goals. 2018. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/

[bib4] 4.Yuan P, Wang L. Migrant workers: China boom leaves children behind. Nature. 2016;529:25. doi: 10.1038/529025a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib5] 5.Reyes MM. UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund); New York: 2008. Migration and Filipino children left-behind: a literature review. [Google Scholar]

[bib6] 6.UN Population Fund and Facultad Lationamericana de Ciencias Sociales . UN Population Fund and Facultad Lationamericana de Ciencias Sociales; Quito: 2006. Ecuador: las Cifras de la migracion internacional. [Google Scholar]

[bib7] 7.Whitehead A, Hashim I. Children and migration. Background paper for DFID migration team. 2005. https://childhub.org/en/system/tdf/library/attachments/dfid_05_child_mig_bac_0408.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=18153

[bib8] 8.Mansuri G. Migration, sex bias, and child growth in rural Pakistan. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2006. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/8423/wps3946.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

[bib9] 9.Ban L, Guo S, Scherpbier RW, Wang X, Zhou H, Tata LJ. Child feeding and stunting prevalence in left-behind children: a descriptive analysis of data from a central and western Chinese population. Int J Public Health. 2017;62:143–151. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0844-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib10] 10.Wen M, Lin D. Child development in rural China: children left behind by their migrant parents and children of nonmigrant families. Child Dev. 2012;83:120–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib11] 11.Qin J, Albin B. The mental health of children left behind in rural China by migrating parents: a literature review. J Public Ment Health. 2013;9:4–16. [Google Scholar]

[bib12] 12.Zhang N, Becares L, Chandola T. Does the timing of parental migration matter for child growth? A life course study on left-behind children in rural China. BMC Public Health. 2015;2015:966. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2296-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib13] 13.Gao Y, Li LP, Kim JH, Congdon N, Lau J, Griffiths S. The impact of parental migration on health status and health behaviours among left behind adolescent school children in China. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib14] 14.Liu Z, Xinying L, Ge X. Left too early: the effects of age at separation from parents on Chinese rural children's symptoms of anxiety and depression. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:2049–2054. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.150474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib15] 15.Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib16] 16.Kyu HH, Pinho C, Wagner JA. Global and national burden of diseases and injuries among children and adolescents between 1990 and 2013: findings from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 Study. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:267–287. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib17] 17.Hernan MA, Clayton D, Keiding N. The Simpson's paradox unraveled. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:780–785. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib18] 18.Wells G, Shea S, O'Connell D. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

[bib19] 19.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Appendix G. Quality appraisal checklist–quantitative studies reporting correlations and associations. 2012. https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg4/chapter/appendix-g-quality-appraisal-checklist-quantitative-studies-reporting-correlations-and

[bib20] 20.Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Wiley-Blackwell; Oxford: 2011. [Google Scholar]

[bib21] 21.Adhikari R, Jampaklay A, Chamratrithirong A, Richter K, Pattaravanich U, Vapattanawong P. The impact of parental migration on the mental health of children left behind. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16:781–789. doi: 10.1007/s10903-013-9809-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib22] 22.Aguilera-Guzman RM, Garcia MS, Garcia FJ. Psychometric characteristics of CES-D in a sample of Mexican rural adolescents in areas with a strong migratory tradition. Salud Mental. 2004;27:57–66. [Google Scholar]

[bib23] 23.Asis MM, Ruiz-Marave C. Leaving a legacy: parental migration and school outcomes among young children in the Philippines. Asian Pac Migr J. 2013;22:349–376. doi: 10.1177/011719681302200303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib24] 24.Battistella G, Conaco CG. The impact of labour migration on the children left behind: a study of elementary school children in the Philippines. SOJOURN. 1998;13:220–241. [Google Scholar]

[bib25] 25.Bi C, Oyserman D. Left behind or moving forward? Effects of possible selves and strategies to attain them among rural Chinese children. J Adolesc. 2015;44:245–258. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib26] 26.Chen M, Chan KL. Parental absence, child victimization, and psychological well-being in rural China. Child Abuse Negl. 2016;59:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib27] 27.Cheng SG, Hao JH, Tao FB. Mental health status of left-behind adolescents in rural areas in Anhui. Zhongguo Xue Xiao Wei Sheng. 2008;29:429–441. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib28] 28.Deng ZX, Li GY. Relationship between suicidal ideation and parental out-migration for work among left-behind children aged 14 years or younger in Guizhou province. Zhong Guo Gong Gong Wei Sheng. 2014;30:1154–1156. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib29] 29.Fan F, Su L, Gill MK, Birmaher B. Emotional and behavioral problems of Chinese left-behind children: a preliminary study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010;45:655–664. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0107-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib30] 30.Feng L. Investigation and comparison of psychological and behavioral characteristics of rural left-behind children and non-left-behind children and the intervention countermeasures. Zhong Guo Fu You Bao Jian. 2014;29:2027–2029. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib31] 31.Gao Y. A comparative study on mental development characteristics between non-parent-absent children and parent-absent children in different care-taking modes. Zhong Guo Te Shu Jiao Yu. 2008;97:56–61. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib32] 32.Ge J, Luo S. The study of rural left-behind children's psychological anxiety. Xian Dai Jiao Yu Ke Xue. 2011;1:72–74. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib33] 33.Graham E, Jordan LP. Migrant parents and the psychological well-being of left-behind children in southeast Asia. J Marriage Fam. 2011;73:763–787. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00844.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib34] 34.Guo J, Chen L, Wang X. The relationship between internet addiction and depression among migrant children and left-behind children in China. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012;15:585–590. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib35] 35.Guo J, Ren X, Wang X. Depression among migrant and left-behind children in China in relation to the quality of parent-child and teacher-child relationships. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib36] 36.He B, Fan J, Liu N. Depression risk of ‘left-behind children’ in rural China. Psychiatry Res. 2012;200:306–312. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib37] 37.Hou K, Liu Y, Qu Z, Jiang S. The social adjustment of left-behind children in rural China: a propensity score analysis. Xin Li Fa Zhan Yu Jiao Yu. 2014;30:646–655. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib38] 38.Hu HW, Lu S, Huang CC. The psychological and behavioral outcomes of migrant and left-behind children in China. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;46:1–10. [Google Scholar]

[bib39] 39.Jiang Q. Emotional and behavioral problems among left-behind middle school children in Fujian province. Zhong Guo Gong Gong Wei Sheng. 2013;12:015. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib40] 40.Jin YL, Wu XJ, Huang SP, Zhao HS, Sun GX, Xu JC. Comparative analysis on the mental health status of rural left-behind children in northern Jiangsu province. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2009;30:472–473. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib41] 41.Jones A, Sharpe J, Sogren M. Children's experiences of separation from parents as a consequence of migration. CJSW. 2004;3:89–109. [Google Scholar]

[bib42] 42.Lan YL, Li Y, Tan XJ, Zhang YY, Tan JY. Personality and emotion and behavior status of children left behind in rural areas. Zhong Hua Xing Wei Yi Xue Yu Nao Ke Xue. 2009;18:343–345. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib43] 43.Li XY, Tang JL, Wu D, Xu WM, Yang L, Jin L. Study on behavioral problems among 5,973 middle-school students in an area. Anhui Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2008;43:108–110. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib44] 44.Li GY, Tao FB. Survey on mental health status and suicidal ideation among rural children left-behind. Chin J Publ Health. 2009;25:905–907. [Google Scholar]

[bib45] 45.Liao ZG, Chen ZH, Wang SH, Xi BR, Liu H, He SJ. Study and comparison of behavioral problems of left-behind children and non-left behind children in rural area of Jiangxi province. Zhong Guo Fu You Bao Jian. 2013;28:4501–4503. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib46] 46.Ling H, Fu E, Zhang JR. Effects of separation age and separation duration among left-behind children in China. Soc Behav Pers. 2015;43:241–254. [Google Scholar]

[bib47] 47.Liu XH, Yang YY, Ha LN, Wang X, Li Q, Dai X. Relationship between emotional problem behavior and social support in left-behind children. Zhong Guo Quan Ke Yi Xue. 2012;28:3287–3290. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib48] 48.Pottinger AM. Children's experience of loss by parental migration in inner-city Jamaica. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2005;75:485–496. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.75.4.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib49] 49.Qiao L, Chen XN, Yuan P. Status of mental health of the left-behind children in certain regions of Sichuan. Xian Dai Yu Fang Yi Xue. 2008;16:3108–3111. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib50] 50.Qu Y, Jiang H, Zhang N, Wang D, Guo L. Prevalence of mental disorders in 6-16-year-old students in Sichuan province, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:5090–5107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120505090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib51] 51.Ren Q, Treiman DJ. The consequences of parental labor migration in China for children's emotional wellbeing. Soc Sci Res. 2016;58:46–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib52] 52.Shen M, Gao J, Liang Z, Wang Y, Du Y, Stallones L. Parental migration patterns and risk of depression and anxiety disorder among rural children aged 10–18 years in China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007802. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib53] 53.Shi J, Chen Z, Yin F, Zhao J, Zhao X, Yao Y. Resilience as moderator of the relationship between left-behind experience and mental health of Chinese adolescents. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2016;62:386–393. doi: 10.1177/0020764016636910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib54] 54.Shi YJ, Bai Y, Shen YN, Kenny K, Rozelle S. Effects of parental migration on mental health of left-behind children: evidence from Northwestern China. China World Econ. 2016;24:105–122. [Google Scholar]

[bib55] 55.Sun XJ, Tian Y, Zhang YX, Xie XC, Heath MA, Zhou Z. Psychological development and educational problems of left-behind children in rural China. SPI. 2015;36:227–252. [Google Scholar]

[bib56] 56.Tao S, Yu L, Gao W, Xue W. Food preferences, personality and parental rearing styles: analysis of factors influencing health of left-behind children. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:2921–2929. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1317-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib57] 57.Tomsa R, Jenaro C. Children left behind in Romania: anxiety and predictor variables. Psychol Rep. 2015;116:485–512. doi: 10.2466/10.17.PR0.116k19w1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib58] 58.Vanore M, Mazzucato V, Siegel M. ‘Left behind’ but not left alone: parental migration & the psychosocial health of children in Moldova. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:252–260. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib59] 59.Wan YM, Wang SF, Ma XH. Mental health condition of the left-behind children in rural area of Anhui province. Zhongguo Xue Xiao Wei Sheng. 2009;10:911–912. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib60] 60.Wang XD, Chen X. A comparative study of social anxiety and cognitive deviation between home-staying and non-home-staying children. Sichuan Shi Fan Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010;37:57–61. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib61] 61.Wang TZ, Chen MC, Sun YH. Research on children's depression and the influence of left-behind status in rural area. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2011;32:1445–1447. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib62] 62.Wang SM, Deng DH, Zhou ZH. Mental health of the left-behind children in different types in rural Hanchuan. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2010;6:005. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib63] 63.Wang RX, Zhu LQ, Niu SX. Investigation on mental health of left-behind primary and secondary school students in northern remote rural of Hebei Province. Jilin Da Xue Xue Bao. 2012;6:065. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib64] 64.Wang LF, Zhang S, Sun YH. Social anxiety and the influencing factors among pupils in rural areas in Anhui. Zhongguo Xue Xiao Wei Sheng. 2006;10:014. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib65] 65.Wang W, Zhao HW, Guo Y, Duan ZY. Study on the mental health status and the influencing factors of left-behind children in rural areas. Xian Dai Yu Fang Yi Xue. 2014;41:994–999. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib66] 66.Wei J, Zheng H. Negative influence of the absence of parental rearing among middle school students left in rural areas. Zhong Guo Xin Li Wei Sheng. 2007;21:83. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib67] 67.Wickramage K, Siriwardhana C, Vidanapathirana P. Risk of mental health and nutritional problems for left-behind children of international labor migrants. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:39. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0412-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib68] 68.Wu Q, Lu D, Kang M. Social capital and the mental health of children in rural China with different experiences of parental migration. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:270–277. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib69] 69.Wu YL, Zhao X, Li YF. The risk and protective factors in the development of childhood social anxiety symptoms among Chinese children. Psychiatry Res. 2016;240:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.08.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib70] 70.Xie QH, Yang YP, Zhong L. Mental health status of rural left-behind children in Sinan county, Guizhou province. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2011;32:468–469. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib71] 71.Xu HW, Xie Y. The causal effects of rural-to-urban migration on children's well-being in China. Eur Sociol Rev. 2015;31:502–519. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcv009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib72] 72.Yang YJ, Tao FB, Wan YH. Depressive symptoms and the influencing factors among left-behind children. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2010;3:321–323. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib73] 73.Yang XM, Wu YW. A survey on the mental health status of rural left-behind children in Gansu. Zhong Guo Fu You Bao Jian. 2011;26:2165–2167. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib74] 74.Yao YS, Kang YW, Jin YL. A prevalence survey on the mental health of left behind adolescents in Anhui province. Zhong Hua Liu Xing Bing Xue. 2010;31:1359–1362. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib75] 75.Zhang L, Luo XR, Li FF. Behavior problems in left-behind children living in rural areas of Changzhi City. Zhong Hua Jian Kang Guan Li Xue. 2011;5:50–53. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib76] 76.Zhang JP. Analysis on the assessment results of family cohesion and adaptability of left-behind children. Qian Yan. 2012;15:126–128. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib77] 77.Zhang YL. Investigation on the mental health status of rural left-behind children. Jiao Yu Xue Shu Yue Kan. 2013;2013:83–90. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib78] 78.Zhao JX, Liu X. Rural left-home-children's depression and antisocial behavior: the protective role of daily pleasures. Xin Li Fa Zhan Yu Jiao Yu. 2010;6:013. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib79] 79.Zhao M, Li H, Li J. Study on the influence of migrant parents on mental health of their left-behind children in rural China. Zhong Guo Wei Sheng Shi Ye Guan Li. 2012;283:60–63. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib80] 80.Zhao X, Chen J, Chen MC, Lv XL, Jiang YH, Sun YH. Left-behind children in rural China experience higher levels of anxiety and poorer living conditions. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:665–670. doi: 10.1111/apa.12602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib81] 81.Zhao C, Wang F, Li L, Zhou X, Hesketh T. Long-term impacts of parental migration on Chinese children's psychosocial well-being: mitigating and exacerbating factors. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017;52:669–677. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1386-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib82] 82.Zhou JY, Luo XR, Wei Z. Characteristics of behavioral and emotional problems of left-behind children in rural areas of Changsha. Shi Yong Er Ke Lin Chuang Za Zhi. 2009;24:1901–1903. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib83] 83.Zhou Z, Wang J. Analysis on the depression symptoms and associated factors in rural primary and middle school students. Anhui Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2011;46:976–978. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib84] 84.Zhu Y, Wang F, Li FH. Health condition of left-behind children in Dingxi county of Guizhou province. Zhong Guo Gong Gong Wei Sheng. 2012;4:45. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib85] 85.Chen ZY. The health status of the left-behind children in rural China. Zhong Guo Ren Kou Ke Xue. 2009;5:11. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib86] 86.Chen L, Wang XH, Qu ZY. An analysis of the growth and nutritional status of migrant children and left-at-home children. Zhong Guo Te Shu Jiao Yu. 2010;122:48–54. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib87] 87.Chen C, He W, Wang Y, Deng L, Jia F. Nutritional status of children during and post-global economic crisis in China. Biomed Environ Sci. 2011;24:321–328. doi: 10.3967/0895-3988.2011.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib88] 88.Chen JY, Zhou H, Cao X, Zhou HY, Zhang S, Ma Y. Analysis on growth status of children in Ziyang, Sichuan province. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2012;33:236–237. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib89] 89.Chen SH, Liao ZG, He SJ. Analysis on the nutritional status of unattended children under 7 years in rural area of Jiangxi province. Zhong Guo Fu You Bao Jian. 2013;28:68–70. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib90] 90.Davis J, Brazil N. Migration, remittances and nutrition outcomes of left-behind children: a national-level quantitative assessment of Guatemala. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0152089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib91] 91.Feng H, Zhang Y, Xian Y, Li Y. Analysis on the physical growth and nutrition status of children under 7 years old in Guizhou. Zhong Guo Fu You Bao Jian. 2010;25:2407–2409. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib92] 92.Frank R. International migration and infant health in Mexico. J Immigr Health. 2005;7:11–22. doi: 10.1007/s10903-005-1386-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib93] 93.Graham E, Jordan LP. Does having a migrant parent reduce the risk of undernutrition for children who stay behind in south-east Asia? Asian Pac Migr J. 2013;22:315–348. doi: 10.1177/011719681302200302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib94] 94.Li CM, Yang N, Zhang JN. Investigation of physical development among left-behind children in rural areas in western Hunan province. Zhong Guo Quan Ke Yi Xue. 2011;9:26. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib95] 95.Lu Y. Internal migration, international migration, and physical growth of left-behind children: a study of two settings. Health Place. 2015;36:118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib96] 96.Mo X, Xu L, Luo H, Wang X, Zhang F, Gai Tobe R. Do different parenting patterns impact the health and physical growth of ‘left-behind’ preschool-aged children? A cross-sectional study in rural China. Eur J Public Health. 2016;26:18–23. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib97] 97.Mou JS, Luo JY, Li YP, Shuai ZR, Liu XH. Study on the nutritional status and determinants among rural stranded children in China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2009;30:439–443. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib98] 98.Mu R, de Brauw A. Migration and young child nutrition: evidence from rural China. J Popul Econ. 2015;28:631–657. [Google Scholar]

[bib99] 99.Nguyen CV. Does parental migration really benefit left-behind children? Comparative evidence from Ethiopia, India, Peru and Vietnam. Soc Sci Med. 2016;153:230–239. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib100] 100.Onyango A, Tucker K, Eisemon T. Household headship and child nutrition: a case study in western Kenya. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39:1633–1639. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib101] 101.Pan CM, Chen XR. Growth and nutritional status among rural left-behind children. Zhong Guo Gong Gong Wei Sheng. 2014;6:004. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib102] 102.Schmeer KK. Family structure and child anemia in Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 2013;95:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib103] 103.Wang YJ, He BY, Fang LH, Li HJ. Preliminary study on the health status among the “left-behind” children in the Xiantao rural area of Hubei Province. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2011;13:977–980. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib104] 104.Wen YF, Wang JQ, Liu RQ. Study on the health condition of the ‘left behind’ children in rural areas of south Anhui province. Xian Dai Yu Fang Yi Xue. 2008;4:038. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib105] 105.Xia YQ, Qing ZG, Su SH, Liu GH, Tang J. Physical growth and nutrition status among left-behind students in Guangdong. Zhongguo Xue Xiao Wei Sheng. 2011;32:1521–1522. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib106] 106.Xie Q, Long H, Shen XH, Tang WJ, Xie LX, Huang YC. Study on the food intake and medium and severe malnutrition in poor rural primary students in Guangxi. Zhongguo Xue Xiao Wei Sheng. 2013;34:979–980. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib107] 107.Yan MH, Wang JS, Xin ZH. Investigation and research on physical health of the left-behind and the non left-behind children in north Jiangsu. Anhui Nong Ye Ke Xue. 2013;41:359–361. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib108] 108.Yu D, Liu A, Yu W. Malnutrition status and influencing factors in children with migrant worker mothers in poor areas in China. Wei sheng yan jiu. 2013;42:429–432. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib109] 109.Zhou C, Sylvia S, Zhang L. China's left-behind children: impact of parental migration on health, nutrition, and educational outcomes. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015;34:1964–1971. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib110] 110.Gao Y, Li L, Chan EY, Lau J, Griffiths SM. Parental migration, self-efficacy and cigarette smoking among rural adolescents in south China. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib111] 111.Jiang S, Chu J, Li C. Alcohol consumption is higher among left-behind Chinese children whose parents leave rural areas to work. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104:1298–1304. doi: 10.1111/apa.13163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib112] 112.Jin CC, Qu ZY, Wang XH. The characteristics and influence factors of smoking behavior of migrated children and unattended children. Zhong Guo Te Shu Jiao Yu. 2009;113:70–74. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib113] 113.Jordan LP, Graham E, Vinh ND. Alcohol use among very early adolescents in Vietnam: what difference does parental migration make? Asian Pac Migr J. 2013;22:401–419. doi: 10.1177/011719681302200305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib114] 114.Li GY, Luo TM, Tao FB. Effects of parental working out-of-home on health risk behavior and psychological status among left-behind children. Zhong Guo Gong Gong Wei Sheng. 2012;7:16–21. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib115] 115.Lin D, Xu Y, Li X, Fan X. On the risk to and the future trend of the family environment and their relationship with rural children's smoking behavior. Zhong Guo Te Shu Jiao Yu. 2011;131:74–79. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib116] 116.Sukamdi, Wattie AM. Tobacco use and exposure among children in migrant and non-migrant households in Java, Indonesia. Asian Pac Migr J. 2013;22:447–464. doi: 10.1177/011719681302200307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib117] 117.Yang TT, Li C, Zhou C. Parental migration and smoking behavior on left-behind children: evidence from a survey in rural Anhui, China. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:127. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0416-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib118] 118.Zhang F, Zhang T, Xiong J, Zhang L, Chen J. Analysis on prevalence and influence factors of smoking and drinking among middle school students of Tujia and Miao in Xiangxi Area. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2015;44:750–755. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib119] 119.Carling J, Tonnessen M. Fathers' whereabouts and children's welfare in Malawi. Dev South Afr. 2013;30:724–742. [Google Scholar]

[bib120] 120.Schmeer K. Father absence due to migration and child illness in rural Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1281–1286. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib121] 121.Wang Z, Zhang JY, Chen J, Tan L, Fan H, Gan HP. Analysis of prevalence status and influence factors of diarrhea among children under 5 years in rural areas of Sichuan province. Xian Dai Yu Fang Yi Xue. 2012;39:4069–4075. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib122] 122.Liu CY, Zhong ZH, Pan JP. Analysis on the current situation of neglected rural children aged 0–6 years and its impact factors in the western areas of China. Zhong Hua Liu Xing Bing Xue. 2012;33:145–149. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib123] 123.Wang JX. Investigation on safe sex issues among adolescent left-behind children. Qing Nian Yan Jiu. 2008;2008:7–14. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib124] 124.Chen L, Qu ZY. Character and impact factors of injuries among left-behind children and migrant children. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2010;31:332–334. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib125] 125.Jiang W, Huang H, Wei J, Shi H, Zhu W, Zhang D. Epidemiological investigation on unintentional injuries of left-behind children in rural area of Nanning. Zhong Guo Fu You Bao Jian. 2011;26:563–565. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib126] 126.Shen M, Yang S, Han J. Non-fatal injury rates among the “left-behind children” of rural China. Inj Prev. 2009;15:244–247. doi: 10.1136/ip.2008.019869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib127] 127.Shen M, Wang Y, Yang S, Du Y, Xiang H, Stallones L. Agricultural exposures and farm-related injuries among adolescents in rural China. Inj Prev. 2013;19:214–217. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib128] 128.Zhao KF, Su H, Fang XH. Study on the distribution and risk factors of injuries among home-stranded children in rural areas of Anhui province. Zhong Hua Liu Xing Bing Xue. 2008;29:338–342. (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib129] 129.Man Y, Mengmeng L, Lezhi L, Ting M, Jingping Z. The psychological problems and related influential factors of left-behind adolescents (LBA) in Hunan, China: a cross sectional study. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16:163. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0639-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib130] 130.Zhou M, Sun X, Huang L. Parental migration and left-behind children's depressive symptoms: estimation based on a nationally-representative panel dataset. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:1069. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib131] 131.Tang W, Wang G, Hu T. Mental health and psychosocial problems among Chinese left-behind children: a cross-sectional comparative study. J Affect Disord. 2018;241:133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib132] 132.Wang XQ, Huo JY, Zhang DJ, Liu PJ. The relationship between mental health and child abuse and the difference between left-at-home children and those living with their parents in rural areas: an analysis based on the two-dimensional four-fact mental health structure. Zhong Guo Te Shu Jiao Yu. 2018;211:58–64. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib133] 133.Li GY, Ran Y. Investigation into the social anxiety of left-behind children under 14 living alone in Guizhou province. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2018;39:1176–1178. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib134] 134.Chang H, Yan Q, Tang L. A comparative analysis of suicide attempts in left-behind children and non-left-behind children in rural China. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib135] 135.Tian X, Ding C, Shen C, Wang H. Does parental migration have negative impact on the growth of left-behind children? New evidence from longitudinal data in rural China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:E1308. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib136] 136.Li P, Zhang TC. Comparison of nutritional status between Han and Yao ethnic left-behind children aged 7–14 years in rural Yongzhou. Zhongguo xue xiao wei sheng. 2018;39:364–371. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]

[bib137] 137.Hu H, Gao J, Jiang H. A comparative study of behavior problems among left-behind children, migrant children and local children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:655. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib138] 138.Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS. Our future: a Lancet Commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet. 2016;387:2423–2478. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00579-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib139] 139.Graham E, Jordan LP, Yeoh BS. Parental migration and the mental health of those who stay behind to care for children in south-east Asia. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib140] 140.Mazzucato V, Cebotari V, Veale A, White A, Grassi M, Vivet J. International parental migration and the psychological well-being of children in Ghana, Nigeria, and Angola. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:215–224. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib141] 141.Abubakar I, Aldridge RW, Devakumar D. The UCL-Lancet Commission on Migration and Health: the health of a world on the move. Lancet. 2018 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32114-7. published online Dec 5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib142] 142.Government of China Announcement on the care and education for rural school aged left-behind children by Ministry of Education and four other agencies. 2013. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-01/10/content_2309058.htm

[bib143] 143.Zhao C, Zhou X, Wang F, Jiang M, Hesketh T. Care for left-behind children in rural China: a realist evaluation of a community-based intervention. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;82:239–245. [Google Scholar]

[bib144] 144.Zhang Y, Ji M, Zou J. Effect of a conditional cash transfer program on nutritional knowledge and food practices among caregivers of 3-5-year-old left-behind children in the rural Hunan Province. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:525. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[bib145] 145.National Bureau of Statistics of China. UNICEF China. UNFPA China Population status of children in China in 2015: facts and figures. 2017. http://www.unicef.cn/en/uploadfile/2017/1009/20171009112814506.pdf

[bib146] 146.International Organization for Migration Health of families left behind. https://www.iom.int/health-families-left-behind

[bib147] 147.Fazel M, Wheeler J, Danesh J. Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in western countries: a systematic review. Lancet. 2005;365:1309–1314. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Health impacts of parental migration on left-behind children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gracia Fellmeth, MSc

Kelly Rose-Clarke, MBPhD

Chenyue Zhao, PhD

Laura K Busert, MSc

Yunting Zheng, MSc

Alessandro Massazza, MSc

Hacer Sonmez, BSc

Ben Eder, MBChB

Alice Blewitt, MSc

Wachiraya Lertgrai, MSc

Miriam Orcutt, MBBS

Katharina Ricci, BA Hons

Olaa Mohamed-Ahmed, MSc

Rachel Burns, MSc

Duleeka Knipe, PhD

Sally Hargreaves, FRCPE

Therese Hesketh, Prof, PhD

Charles Opondo, PhD

Delan Devakumar, PhD

Summary

Background

Methods

Findings

Interpretation

Funding

Introduction

Research in context.

Methods

Search strategy and selection criteria

Data analysis

Role of the funding source

Results

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Discussion

Panel. Next steps and future research.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

Contributors

Declaration of interests

Supplementary Material

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases