Skip to main content
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety logoLink to Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
. 2018 Dec 12;10:103–108. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S183892

Ceftriaxone-associated nephrolithiasis and gallstone in adults

Ghodsiyeh Azarkar 1, Motahare Mahi Birjand 2, Alireza Ehsanbakhsh 3, Bita Bijari 1, Mohammad Reza Abedini 4, Masood Ziaee 1,
PMCID: PMC6296198  PMID: 30588126

Abstract

Background

Ceftriaxone (CTX) is widely used for the treatment of bacterial infections; however, side effects such as gallstone and nephrolithiasis have been reported in children. There is limited information about urinary tract calculi as CTX side effects in adults. Therefore, the present study was aimed to evaluate the incidence of gallstone and nephrolithiasis following CTX administration.

Methods

The present study was conducted in the Vali-e-Asr Hospital. Eighty-four patients with various infectious diseases with different daily treatment (mean ± SD: 4.19±2.54) were included in this study, consisting of 49 females and 35 males. The mean of total doses used in patients was 10.2143 (SD: 5.8585). To detect possible gallstone, gallbladder sludge, and urolithiasis, patients were evaluated by serial ultrasound before and after CTX treatment. Patients with renal and hepatobiliary dysfunction were excluded from the study and did not receive any nephrotoxic drugs during this study. Demographic parameters including age, sex, body mass index, dosage of CTX, as well as the duration of treatment and hospitalization were determined. Statistical significances were determined using Fisher’s exact test and independent t-test.

Results

Results from our study showed that the incidence of gallstone and nephrolithiasis were 8.8% and 1.5% following CTX administration, respectively. Surprisingly, we found a significant correlation in terms of age between patients with and without gallstone (P=0.03).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the patients’ age might play a role in the development of such a complication. This indicates the need for a close monitoring of CTX-treated patients to assess the possible formation of gallstone and nephrolithiasis.

Keywords: ceftriaxone, gallstones, nephrolithiasis, sonography

Introduction

Ceftriaxone (CTX) is a semisynthetic third-generation cephalosporin, which is widely used for the treatment of various bacterial infections. The drug shows potent antimicrobial activity against a wide variety of bacteria, including Streptococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Brucella melitensis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.15 Because of its long plasma half-life, single daily dosing, beta-lactamase resistance, and potent antibacterial activities against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, CTX is the antibiotic of choice in most cases.6,7 CTX, showing a remarkable stability against beta-hydrolysis, exerts its antimicrobial activity through inhibition of transpeptidase enzymes that are responsible for bacterial cell wall synthesis.8,9 Although CTX was shown to be relatively safe, there are complications associated antibiotic treatment, such as gallstone and nephrolithiasis.5 It is important to understand such complications due the fact that they can be treated easily. In contrast, confusion regarding these complications may lead to more invasive treatment such as surgery.10

Approximately 33%–67% of the administered dose is eliminated through renal excretion, while 40% is secreted in the bile followed by elimination via the gastrointestinal tract.6,1113 A variety of studies showed that CTX can be concentrated in the bile 20–150 times more than in serum.7,1417 In this condition, CTX can bind to calcium cations in the bile and induce reversible precipitations, resulting in crystallization.18 CTX-induced crystals lead to nephrolithiasis,1922 gallstone, and bladder sludge.2325

A variety of studies revealed contradictory results about the incidence of gallstone and nephrolithiasis, as well as predisposing factors such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), drug dosage, and the duration of treatment.19,21,26 Most of the studies also focused on CTX-associated nephrolithiasis and gallstone in children. Nevertheless, there is limited information on urinary tract calculi as one of the side effects of CTX in adults. In this light, the present study was performed to assess the incidence of nephrolithiasis and gallstone associated with CTX administration as well as predisposing factors in adult patients.

Methods

This quasi-experimental before-and-after study was conducted on 84 patients aged from 15 to 87 (mean age =55.49±18.94) years and hospitalized with different types of infectious diseases in Birjand University of Medical Sciences-Affiliated Hospital (Vali-e-Aser Hospital) from 2011 until 2015. The procedures used in this study were approved by the Ethics Committee of Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran (ir.bums.REC.1394.419). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Signed written informed consents were obtained from the patients who participated in the study. In addition, patients’ parent provided written informed consent for any participant below 18 years of age. Pneumonia (78.9%) and gastroenteritis (8.8%) were found to be the most common causes of hospital admission, respectively. All patients were examined for liver and kidney health before the study. Patients suffering from renal and hepatobiliary dysfunction were excluded from the study. This is also important to note that patients did not take any nephrotoxic drugs. Patients received different daily treatment of CTX (mean ± SD: 4.19±2.54) and the mean of used total dose was 10.2143 (SD: 5.8585). To assess the health of the biliary and urinary tracts, all the patients were examined with sonography by a radiologist immediately before the treatment. Only cases with normal sonographic features were included in the study. In specific cases, the results were confirmed by two radiologists. The patients were also evaluated by the same radiologist for kidney and gallbladder stones by serial ultrasound during and after CTX treatment to detect possible gallstone, gallbladder sludge, and urolithiasis. The serum levels of urea, creatinine, bilirubin, and hepatic enzymes were recorded before and after treatment of all patients. All patients received CTX alone without additional antibiotics.

The presence of mobile and gravity-dependent materials, accompanied by a clear acoustic shadow, was considered as the criterion for a positive sonographic examination. In addition, low-level echo materials lined in the dependent portion of the gallbladder without acoustic shadowing were diagnosed as biliary sludge. Positive sonographic findings were reassessed and confirmed by another sonographist. When sonographic features of complications and renal symptoms and/or biliary symptoms were detected in the patients, CTX treatment discontinued and the supportive care and treatment were carried out for 10 days followed by sonography in the first 2 weeks and every 2 weeks until these findings were completely normalized. The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significances were determined using Fisher’s exact test and independent t-test. P-values of 0.05 or less were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The present study was performed on 84 patients, including 49 (58.3%) females and 35 (41.7%) males. Out of 84 patients, 78 (92.9%) were married and most patients were living in rural areas. Demographic parameters, including patients’ age, sex, BMI, CTX dosage as well as the duration of treatment and hospitalization, were assessed as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of patients

Parameter N % Mean ± SD
Sex Male 35 41.7
Female 49 58.3
Age (years) <40 20 23.8 55.49±18.94
40–50 11 13.1
50–60 17 20.3
60–70 15 17.8
>70 21 25
BMI Normal 56 66.7 23.57±5.75
Overweight (25–30) 19 22.2
Obese (≥30) 19 11.1
Length of treatment (days) 4.19±2.54
Number of drug dosage 2.06±0.38
Starting doses (g) 1.09±0.29
Total dose 10.21±5.85

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

Posttreatment sonographic evaluation showed nephrolithiasis in 1 (1.5%) and gallstone in 6 (8.8%) of the 84 patients. Table 2 represents the characteristics of patients with nephrolithiasis and gallstone. It is also worth to mention that size (mean ± SD) of kidney stone and gallstone in these patients was 4.41±1.69 and 11.74±13.35 mm, respectively.

Table 2.

Characteristics of patients with nephrolithiasis and gallstone

Patient no. Sex Age (years) Reason for hospitalization Lithiasis (calculi) Drug dose (g)

1 M 39 Pneumonia Nephrolithiasis 1
2 F Not available UTI Gallstone 1
3 F 87 UTI Gallstone 2
4 F 43 Pneumonia Gallstone 1
5 M 85 Gastroenteritis Gallstone 1
6 F 68 Pneumonia Gallstone 1
7 F 82 Pneumonia Gallstone 1

Abbreviation: UTI, urinary tract infection.

Comparison of the groups with or without gallstone demonstrated no significant differences with respect to BMI, drug dosage, and the duration of treatment (Tables 3 and 4). Importantly, there was a significant difference between gallstone and age (P=0.03; Table 4).

Table 3.

Comparison of drug doses, the number, and duration of drug use in patients with or without gallstone

Variables With (n=6)
Without (n=78)
P-value
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD

Starting dose (g) 1.16±0.40 1.06±0.24 0.37
Dose of treatment duration (g/dose) 1.00±0.00 1.16±0.53 0.5
Number of drug use (within 24 hours) 2.00±0.00 2.06±0.38 0.31
Treatment duration (days) 5.33±4.04 4.10±2.18 0.42

Table 4.

Comparison of BMI and age in patients with or without gallstone

Variables With (n=6)
Without (n=78)
P-value
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD

Age 73.00±18.34 54.15±18.99 0.03
Weight 53.40±11.78 59.74±13.62 0.31
BMI 22.49±2.57 23.27±5.23 0.74

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

In addition, our results showed that there are no significant differences between the two groups and those with comorbid gastroenteritis and pneumonia (P=0.43; Table 5). No significant differences were also found between gallstone as with patient’s sex (P=0.46).

Table 5.

Comparison of comorbid conditions in patients with or without gallstone

Disease With gallstone (n=6) Without gallstone (n=78) P-value
n (%) n (%)
Gastroenteritis 1 (16.6) 4 (5.1) 0.19
Pneumonia 2 (33.3) 30 (38.4) 0.43
Other 0.0 (0.0) 5 (6.4)

Discussion

In the present study, our results have demonstrated that the incidence of gallstone and nephrolithiasis following CTX therapy was 8.8% and 1.5%, respectively. Interestingly, we also found a significant difference in terms of age between patients with and without gallstone (P=0.03). It is important to note that patients were showed acute urinary tract infection and exhibited no risk factors for stone development. In addition, the absence of stones was confirmed using sonography before the patients received CTX.

CTX, as an anion, can lead to reversible pseudolithiasis, which forms an insoluble salt with calcium and, like bilirubin, can precipitate with calcium.27 A variety of studies revealed a significant incidence of CTX-associated urolithiasis, demonstrating that gallstone and nephrolithiasis are complications of CTX therapy.18,28,29 However, the incidence of gallstone in CTX-treated patients varies among studies.

In an early study in 1988, Schaad et al10 reported a reversible CTX-induced gallstone iñ40% (16 of 37) of severely ill children following high doses of CTX. In 1990, Cochat et al described a 13-year-old boy with meningitis who revealed the gallstone following 9 days of CTX therapy.30 In addition, de Moor et al reported a 7-year-old boy with CTX-associated nephrolithiasis and gallstone 4 days after treatment initiation.27 Stone formation was attributed to a high CTX dose (100 mg/kg/day in severe infections vs 125 mg/kg/day in their patient).

In another study carried out by Palanduz et al,31 CTX was administered at a dosage of 100 mg/kg/day for 1–3 weeks to 118 children, 8 and 12 of whom were found to have gallbladder sludge and pseudolithiasis, respectively. In addition, the incidence rate of gallstone was reported to be 17%. The abnormalities were resolved after stopping the CTX. In parallel, Prince and Senac reported a 14-year-old boy showing both CTX-induced gallstone and nephrolithiasis, who was being treated with CTX (4 g/day) for epidural abscess.32 The patient was recovered after stopping the CTX therapy. In 2004, Avci et al19 found that children receiving a high CTX dose (100 mg/kg/day) for the treatment of severe infections developed positive sonographic findings, representing the small renal stones and nephrolithiasis in 4 (7.8%) of 51 children. In a study carried out by Acun et al,33 gallbladder and urinary tract precipitations developed in 5 of 35 children treated with CTX, 1 with gallbladder sludge, 1 with gallstone and urinary bladder sludge, and 3 with gallstone. Interestingly, their findings indicated predominance in females, inconsistent with other above-mentioned studies. Moreover, Ozturk et al34 reported the 57.6% incidence of pseudolithiasis and sludge in the gallbladder of patients receiving CTX. In 2006, Biner et al35 reported abnormal gallbladder sonograms and urolithiasis in 17% and 0.6% of children receiving CTX, respectively. Importantly, patients with pseudolithiasis were older and treated with higher drug doses. Similar to other studies, they reported that gallstone usually occurs in children receiving high doses of CTX. Furthermore, Araz et al36 in 2007 demonstrated that children receiving CTX 100 mg/kg/ day for meningitis developed biliary sludge and gallstones.

At the same time, in a study performed by Mohkam et al,21 the incidence rate of nephrolithiasis was found to be 1.4% for 284 children with pyelonephritis who were treated with 75 mg/kg intravenous CTX. They suggested that CTX-treated patients may be at an increased risk of kidney stone formation. In 2011, Chutipongtanate and Thongboonkerd20 showed that CTX is crystallized with free calcium in dose- and time-dependent manner. Calcium-depletion assay revealed that crystallization required free calcium as a substrate. In another study performed by Fesharakinia et al in 96 children who received 50–100 mg/kg/day CTX, nephrolithiasis and gallbladder stones were developed in 6 (6.3%) and 1 (1%) patients, respectively.37 Additionally, Tsukagoshi et al showed that patients with central nervous system infections, who were treated with CTX (4 g/day) for 35–69 days, developed CTX-induced pseudolithiasis and nephrolithiasis.38

In contrast to the results obtained by the above-mentioned studies, a significant difference in terms of age was found in this study. Therefore, the present study suggests that young adults may be at an increased risk for the formation of urinary stones during CTX therapy. Consistent with our study, Ettestad et al suggested that biliary sludge and pseudolithiasis may be more prevalent in younger patients. However, it is believed that the disease is dose-dependent and, more commonly, occurs in children receiving higher doses.39 Consistent with studies carried out by Mohkam et al21 and Avci et al,19 no significant difference was found in terms of sex between patients with and without gallstones. However, Fesharakinia et al37 showed that there was a significant correlation between nephrolithiasis and male sex. As Acun et al mentioned,33 variations in the methodology, including the infection nature, fasting, hydration, antibiotic dose, duration and infusion rate of CTX treatment, as well as the timing of the first ultrasonographic control, can explain the differences in the prevalence of the CTX-associated abnormalities.

A few limitations of this study have to be considered. First, the sample size of this study is rather limited; however, it has to be taken into consideration that the results obtained revealed significant association with patients’ age. In addition, the present study assessed the data from a single hospital; the findings of the research may not be more reliable than multicenter studies.

Conclusion

In summary, the results of this study have demonstrated that the incidence of gallstone and nephrolithiasis following CTX therapy was 8.8% and 1.5%, respectively. Our findings also have suggested that the patients’ age might play a role in the development of CTX-associated gallstone (P=0.03). However, comparison of the groups with or without gallstone demonstrated no significant differences with respect to patient’s sex, BMI, drug dosage of CTX, and the duration of treatment with CTX. Considerably, more studies are required to closely monitor CTX-treated patients regarding possible gallbladder and kidney stone formation.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their appreciation to all contributors who have made the achievement of this study. This work was supported by a research grant (453) from vice chancellor for research, Birjand University of Medical Sciences.

Footnotes

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Mischnik A, Baumert P, Hamprecht A, et al. DZIF-ATHOS Study Group In vitro susceptibility to 19 agents other than β-lactams among third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae recovered on hospital admission. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(5):1359–1363. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pacifici GM, Marchini G. Clinical pharmacology of ceftriaxone in neonates and infants: effects and pharmacokinetics. Int J Pediatr. 2017;5(9):5751–5778. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kaye KS, Pogue JM. Infections caused by resistant Gram-negative bacteria: epidemiology and management. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35(10):949–962. doi: 10.1002/phar.1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pfaller MA, Flamm RK, Duncan LR, Mendes RE, Jones RN, Sader HS. Antimicrobial activity of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam tested against 18,386 Gram-negative organisms from Europe and the Asia-Pacific region (2013–2014) Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;88(2):177–183. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang S, Huang X, Xu Q, Xu T. Research progress of mechanisms of ceftriaxone associated nephrolithiasis. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2017;17(17):1584–1587. doi: 10.2174/1389557516666160801092713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Arvidsson A, Alván G, Angelin B, Borgå O, Nord CE. Ceftriaxone: renal and biliary excretion and effect on the colon microflora. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982;10(3):207–215. doi: 10.1093/jac/10.3.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Richards D, Heel R, Brogden R, Speight T, Avery G. Ceftriaxone. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic use. Drugs. 1984;27(6):469–527. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198427060-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Neu HC. Relation of structural properties of betalactam antibiotics to antibacterial activity. Am J Med. 1985;79(2A):2–13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90254-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Raju KS, Reddy KNK, Vasu K. Prescribing pattern for infectious diseases in tertiary care pediatric hospital. Indian J Res Pharm Biotechnol. 2017;5(1):68. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schaad UB, Wedgwood-Krucko J, Tschaeppeler H. Reversible ceftriaxone-associated biliary pseudolithiasis in children. Lancet. 1988;2(8625):1411–1413. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90596-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Park HZ, Lee SP, Schy AL. Ceftriaxone-associated gallbladder sludge. Identification of calcium-ceftriaxone salt as a major component of gallbladder precipitate. Gastroenterology. 1991;100(6):1665–1670. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90667-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xia Y, Lambert KJ, Schteingart CD, Gu JJ, Hofmann AF. Concentrative biliary secretion of ceftriaxone. Inhibition of lipid secretion and precipitation of calcium ceftriaxone in bile. Gastroenterology. 1990;99(2):454–465. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91029-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brogard JM, Blickle JF, Jehl F, Arnaud JP, Paris-Bockel D, Monteil H. High biliary elimination of ceftriaxone in man. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1988;26(4):167–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Neu HC, Meropol NJ, Fu KP. Antibacterial activity of ceftriaxone (Ro 13-9904), a beta-lactamase-stable cephalosporin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981;19(3):414–423. doi: 10.1128/aac.19.3.414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McNamara PJ, Stoeckel K, Ziegler WH. Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone following intravenous administration of a 3 g dose. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;22(1):71–75. doi: 10.1007/BF00606428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heim-Duthoy KL, Caperton EM, Pollock R, Matzke GR, Enthoven D, Peterson PK. Apparent biliary pseudolithiasis during ceftriaxone therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34(6):1146–1149. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.6.1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zinberg J, Chernaik R, Coman E, Rosenblatt R, Brandt LJ. Reversible symptomatic biliary obstruction associated with ceftriaxone pseudolithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86(9):1251–1254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dursun M, Otunctemur A, Ozbek E. Kidney stones and ceftriaxone. Eur Med J. 2015;3(1):68–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Avci Z, Koktener A, Uras N, et al. Nephrolithiasis associated with ceftriaxone therapy: a prospective study in 51 children. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(11):1069–1072. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.044156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chutipongtanate S, Thongboonkerd V. Ceftriaxone crystallization and its potential role in kidney stone formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;406(3):396–402. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.02.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mohkam M, Karimi A, Gharib A, et al. Ceftriaxone associated nephrolithiasis: a prospective study in 284 children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007;22(5):690–694. doi: 10.1007/s00467-006-0401-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gargollo PC, Barnewolt CE, Diamond DA. Pediatric ceftriaxone nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 2005;173(2):577–578. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000148801.12464.b3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Acun C, Erdem LO, Sogut A, Erdem CZ, Tomac N, Gundogdu S. Ceftriaxone-induced biliary pseudolithiasis and urinary bladder sludge. Pediatr Int. 2004;46(3):368–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.2004.01900.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ustyol L, Bulut MD, Agengin K, et al. Comparative evaluation of ceftriaxone- and cefotaxime-induced biliary pseudolithiasis or nephrolithiasis: a prospective study in 154 children. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017;36(6):547–553. doi: 10.1177/0960327116658108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Krzemień G, Książczyk T, Szmigielska A, et al. Ceftriaxone-associated acute gallbladder enlargement – an unexpected diagnosis in the child with urinary tract infection. Dev Period Med. 2015;19(2):182–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dooki MR, Norouzi A. Cholelithiasis in childhood: a cohort study in north of Iran. Iran J Pediatr. 2013;23(5):588. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.de Moor RA, Egberts AC, Schröder CH. Ceftriaxone-associated nephrolithiasis and biliary pseudolithiasis. Eur J Pediatr. 1999;158(12):975–977. doi: 10.1007/s004310051261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li N, Zhou X, Yuan J, Chen G, Jiang H, Zhang W. Ceftriaxone and acute renal failure in children. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):e917–e922. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Besim H, Arslan K. Ceftriaxone associated acute cholecystitis. Arch Balkan Med Union. 2016;51(2):258–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cochat P, Cochat N, Jouvenet M, et al. Ceftriaxone-associated nephrolithiasis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1990;5(11):974–976. doi: 10.1093/ndt/5.11.974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Palanduz A, Yalçin I, Tonguç E, et al. Sonographic assessment of ceftriaxone-associated biliary pseudolithiasis in children. J Clin Ultrasound. 2000;28(4):166–168. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(200005)28:4<166::aid-jcu2>3.0.co;2-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Prince JS, Senac MO. Ceftriaxone-associated nephrolithiasis and biliary pseudolithiasis in a child. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33(9):648–651. doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-0963-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Acun C, Erdem LO, Söğüt A, et al. Gallbladder and urinary tract precipitations associated with ceftriaxone therapy in children: a prospective study. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2004;24(1):25–31. doi: 10.1179/027249304225013349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ozturk A, Kaya M, Zeyrek D, Ozturk E, Kat N, Ziylan SZ. Ultrasonographic findings in ceftriaxone: associated biliary sludge and pseudolithiasis in children. Acta Radiol. 2005;46(1):112–116. doi: 10.1080/02841850510015983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Biner B, Öner N, Çeltik C, et al. Ceftriaxone-associated biliary pseudolithiasis in children. J Clin Ultrasound. 2006;34(5):217–222. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Araz N, Okan V, Demirci M, Araz M. Pseudolithiasis due to ceftriaxone treatment for meningitis in children: report of 8 cases. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2007;211(3):285–290. doi: 10.1620/tjem.211.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fesharakinia A, Ehsanbakhsh AR, Ghorashadizadeh N. Ceftriaxone-associated nephrolithiasis in children. Iran J Pediatr. 2013;23(6):643. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tsukagoshi S, Ishizawa K, Hirayanagi K, et al. Progressive pseudolithiasis associated with the intravenous administration of ceftriax-one in patients with central nervous system infections. Intern Med. 2017;56(23):3189–3192. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.8826-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ettestad PJ, Campbell GL, Welbel SF, et al. Biliary complications in the treatment of unsubstantiated Lyme disease. J Infect Dis. 1995;171(2):356–361. doi: 10.1093/infdis/171.2.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES