Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy has proven high efficacy in treating diverse cancer entities by immune checkpoint modulation and adoptive T-cell transfer. However, patterns of treatment response differ substantially from conventional therapies, and reliable surrogate markers are missing for early detection of responders versus non-responders. Current imaging techniques using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emmission-tomograpy (18F-FDG-PET) cannot discriminate, at early treatment times, between tumor progression and inflammation. Therefore, direct imaging of T cells at the tumor site represents a highly attractive tool to evaluate effective tumor rejection or evasion. Moreover, such markers may be suitable for theranostic imaging.
Methods: We mainly investigated the potential of two novel pan T-cell markers, CD2 and CD7, for T-cell tracking by immuno-PET imaging. Respective antibody- and F(ab´)2 fragment-based tracers were produced and characterized, focusing on functional in vitro and in vivo T-cell analyses to exclude any impact of T-cell targeting on cell survival and antitumor efficacy.
Results: T cells incubated with anti-CD2 and anti-CD7 F(ab´)2 showed no major modulation of functionality in vitro, and PET imaging provided a distinct and strong signal at the tumor site using the respective zirconium-89-labeled radiotracers. However, while T-cell tracking by anti-CD7 F(ab´)2 had no long-term impact on T-cell functionality in vivo, anti-CD2 F(ab´)2 caused severe T-cell depletion and failure of tumor rejection.
Conclusion: This study stresses the importance of extended functional T-cell assays for T-cell tracer development in cancer immunotherapy imaging and proposes CD7 as a highly suitable target for T-cell immuno-PET imaging.
Keywords: T-cell imaging, cancer immunotherapy, T-cell function, immuno-PET
Introduction
Immunotherapy, especially the application of immune checkpoint modulators, has become a highly effective treatment strategy for diverse tumor entities 1,2. In addition, other immunotherapeutic approaches such as adoptive transfer of T cells transgenic for defined chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) or T-cell receptors (TCR) have proven efficacy in diverse malignancies 3-7. The US Food and Drug Administration recently approved the use of CD19 CAR T cells for the treatment of advanced B-cell-derived malignancies. However, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of immune modulators or cellular immunotherapies differ substantially from conventional chemotherapy or molecular therapy. Animal models provide only limited information because of the highly species-specific and individual specificities of the tumor immune microenvironment. Thus, until now, many questions remain unresolved, including the understanding and prediction of response versus primary and adoptive immune resistance, as well as the occurrence of adverse effects at early time points 1,8.
In fact, current computer tomography (CT) imaging techniques and the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 9 have shown major limitations. In particular, the early distinction between progression and pseudo-progression, as well as a reliable evaluation of response heterogeneity is difficult and requires novel evaluation criteria better adapted to these immunotherapies 10,11. Similarly, novel evaluation criteria have been established for 18FDG-PET to address these issues 12-15. Although 18FDG-PET stands out for its high sensitivity 15,16, it has the intrinsic limit that radiolabeled glucose is incorporated by not only metabolically active tumor cells but also metabolically active immune cells. Thus, innovative imaging techniques that can be used as predictive and early surrogate markers covering the whole spectrum of immunotherapeutic response patterns are urgently needed.
In addition, safe tracking of immune cells represents another essential demand when introducing a novel imaging tracer to monitor immunomodulatory therapies. Thus far, imaging methods focusing on tumor detection, such as PSMA imaging for prostate cancer 17, have not raised high safety issues because radioactive labeling can also be used therapeutically with respective tracers and patients may benefit from induction of target cell death.
Currently, several strategies are being tested for their potential as functional immune-imaging approaches in immunotherapies. For genetically modified cells, reporter genes 18-22 can be introduced to specifically identify the modified T cells in vivo. This technique is deemed safe when engineered T cells are injected at the tumor site of patients with malignant glioma 22. However, this approach is not possible for endogenous T cells activated therapeutically by monoclonal antibodies such as anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-CTLA-4. Direct imaging of T cells, therefore, remains the most comprehensive method in the context of a variety of immunotherapies to evaluate efficacy and immune-mediated toxicity. Subpopulation-specific markers such as CD4 and CD8, as well as the TCR and CD3, have been proposed as targets and tested using various tracer molecules in murine models of immunotherapy 23-31. Recently, a clinical trial has been initiated targeting CD8+ cells by 89Zr-labeled IAB22M2C in patients with solid tumors and Hodgkin lymphoma (NCT03107663) for which no modulating effects on adoptively transferred T cells have been observed using a T-cell engraftment model 32. We have previously described a human TCR with a murinized domain (TCRmu) tracking specifically genetically modified T cells but not detecting immune modulated endogenous T cells 33,34. Of note, the full antibody directed against the murinized domain showed a functional impact on T cells in vitro and in vivo, whereas the derived F(ab´)2 was largely inert 33. Others have also observed impairment of T-cell functions when specific T-cell imaging technologies targeting CD4 or the TCR are applied 28,29, although in most studies, functionality testing remains insufficiently investigated.
T cells represent the main pharmacodynamically active partners in diverse immunotherapies. However, the effects may be mediated by different T-cell subpopulations 35-41. With the aim to develop an approach that can be used in different settings, we selected antibodies targeting antigens broadly expressed on T cells and focused on CD2, CD3, and CD7. CD3 is a TCR co-receptor involved in T-cell stimulation and was previously chosen as target structure for T-cell imaging 30,31. CD2 is expressed on T cells, NK cells, and thymocytes where it plays a role in T-cell adhesion and activation via CD58 42-46. Furthermore, the expression of CD2 has been described to highly correlate with cytolytic activity in tumors 47, making this target especially interesting to track effector T cells. CD7 is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, although there is limited information about this target so far. It is a known marker for mature T cells and NK cells but also for early-stage hematopoietic precursor cells 48,49.
Murine anti-human antibodies targeting these antigens were selected and tested for their potential as immune-imaging tracers to monitor T cells. The most promising antibody clones maintaining functional antitumor efficacy of targeted T cells in vitro were further investigated in vivo with respective 89Zr-labeled F(ab´)2 using a previously described mouse model of adoptive T-cell transfer 33.
Methods
Primary material and cell lines
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated via density gradient centrifugation from blood donated by healthy volunteers according to the standards of the local ethical board and the Declaration of Helsinki. Isolation, stimulation, and cultivation of cells were performed as previously described 33,34,50. PBMC were nonspecifically stimulated with IL-2 (50 U/mL; PeproTech, USA) and OKT3 (30 ng/mL; BioLegend, San Diego, CA) and cultivated in RPMI supplemented with 5% human serum, 5% fetal calf serum, penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL), 10 mM non-essential amino acids, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 mM HEPES, and recombinant human IL-7/IL-15 (5 ng/mL each). Human CD8+ central memory T cells (TCM) were isolated from PBMC via CD45RA-CD4-CD62L+ cell isolation using magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and stimulated with human T-cell activating CD3/CD28 dynabeads (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and IL-2 (30 U/mL) according to manufacturer's recommendations.
The following cell lines were used: human acute leukemia cell line ML2 (The CABRI consortium, received in 2004), IL-15-producing NSO cells (provided by S. R. Riddell in 2011; 51), OKT11 (anti-CD2) hybridoma (P3X63Ag8, Sigma-Aldrich, St.Louis, MO, in 2016), and T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) hybridoma (HB-2, ATCC, Manassas,VI, in 2016).
ML2 cells were retrovirally transduced with genes coding for HLA-B*07:02 (B7) or HLA-B*15:01 (B15) linked to enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP). The stable ML2-derived cell lines ML2-B7GFP (ML2-B7) and ML2-B15GFP (ML2-B15) were generated by sorting and single cell cloning, respectively 33.
TCM were transduced retrovirally with the previously described MPO5-specific TCR 2.5D6 linked to red fluorescent protein (TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM) 33,50 or iRFP only (iRFP TCM). In addition to microscopic analysis, the cell lines were regularly tested for mycoplasma infection (VenorGeM Mycoplasma Detection Kit, Minerva Biolabs, Berlin, Germany) and cell line-specific surface markers.
Antibodies and F(ab´)2, blocking and Kd determination
For the clones OKT11 (anti-CD2) and T3-3A1 (anti-CD7), antibodies were isolated from the supernatant of the hybridoma cells using Protein A-Sepharose (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) and F(ab´)2 was produced by pepsin digestion using F(ab´)2-Preparation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), as described elsewhere 33,34. Protein purity was assessed by size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC; BioSep™ SEC-s3000 LC Column, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) and binding function was confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition, the first in vitro experiments were performed with anti-CD3 antibodies of the clones BC3 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), VIT3b (kindly provided by Institute of Immunology, Medical University Vienna), and OKT3 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA), as well as another anti-CD7 antibody (clone 4H9; Caprico Biotechnology, Norcross, GA). Anti-CD3 antibody OKT3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) served as positive control 52,53, whereas mouse IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b isotype antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) served as negative control.
To determine specific binding of T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) IgG1 and IgG2a antibody, CD7 blocking analysis of PBMC-derived T cells was performed as follows. Cells were stained with T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) antibody with and without pre-incubation of a polyclonal sheep anti-human CD7 antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Afterwards, cells were washed and stained with either anti-mouse-IgG1 or anti-mouse-IgG2a antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Subsequently, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Specific binding of the sheep anti-human CD7 antibody was confirmed by staining with an anti-sheep-IgG antibody (clone A756; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), followed by flow cytometric analysis.
To determine the dissociation constant (Kd), TCM were incubated with various concentrations of Pacific-Blue (PacBl)-labeled antibodies or F(ab´)2 (Antibody Labeling Kit, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and analyzed by flow cytometry. The Kd was calculated by nonlinear regression analysis of plotted mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of 7-AAD- cells versus applied antibody concentrations.
Flow cytometric analysis
For flow cytometric analysis, the following antibodies were used: anti-human CD3 (clone UCHT1), anti-human CD3 (clone HIT3a), anti-human CD45 (clone J.33), anti-human CD56 (clone B159), anti-human CD4 (clone RPA-T4), anti-human CD8 (clone RPA-T8), anti-human CD62L (clone DREG-56), anti-human CD45RA (clone HI100), anti-human CD45RO (clone UCHL1), anti-human CD20 (clone 2H7), anti-human CD14 (clone M5E2), anti-human CD33 (clone WM53; all BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), anti-human CD2 (RPA-2.10), anti-human CD127 (clone A019D5; both BioLegend, San Diego, CA), anti-human CD5 (clone BL1a), anti-human CD7 (clone 8H8.1; both Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA), anti-human CD56 (clone CMSSB), anti-human CD25 (clone BC96; both Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), and isotype controls (clones MOPC-21 and X40). Dead cells were identified with 7-aminoactinomycine (7-AAD; Sigma-Aldrich, St.Louis, MO) and samples were analyzed using LSRII (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) flow cytometer. Data were evaluated by FlowJoSoftware7.6.5 (FlowJo, LLC; Ashland, OR). Similarly, different blood cells and T-cell subpopulations were analyzed for CD2, CD7, and CD3.
Quantification of surface expression on specifically activated TCM
The surface expression of the target antigens CD2 and CD7 on specifically activated TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM was investigated during co-incubation with ML2-B7 tumor cells by flow cytometry. Measured geometric mean (GM) of surface markers was related to GM of quantification beads (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), and labeling efficacy of the antibodies was determined via nanophotometer (Implen, Munich, Germany). As controls, iRFP TCM were co-cultured with ML2-B7 and TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM with ML2-B15 tumor cells.
Internalization analysis
Antibodies and F(ab´)2 (100 nM) were added to 1×106 PBMC-derived T cells/mL to determine internalization as described by Li and colleagues 54. After the residual antibodies were removed from the surface by acidic wash, T cells were stained for the respective surface molecules and 7-AAD and analyzed by flow cytometry. Internalization was determined by normalization of MFI of protein applied to non-pretreated cells.
In vitro testing of apoptosis, proliferation, and IFNγ production
PBMC-derived T cells (1×106/mL) were incubated with antibodies or F(ab´)2 at several concentrations. Analysis of apoptosis was performed after 18 h of incubation as previously described 33. Harvested cells were washed with PBS and stained for 10 min at 25 °C with 3 µL of annexin V-APC (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) and 0.5 µg of 7-AAD. The reaction was stopped by addition of 100 µL binding buffer (0.01 M HEPES, 0.14 M NaCl, and 2.5 mM CaCl2; pH 7.4), and the samples were analyzed immediately by flow cytometry. Apoptotic cells were calculated as the percentage of either annexin V or 7-AAD positive cells of all cells under exclusion of debris.
For analysis of proliferative capacity, PBMC-derived T cells, activated with the anti-CD3 antibody OKT3 (30 ng/mL) and IL-2 (50 U/mL) for 2-3 days, were stained with CellTrace Violet (CTV) using the CTV Cell Proliferation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer's information. Briefly, PBMC-derived T cells (1×106/mL) were incubated with 5 µM of CTV staining solution for 10 min at 37 °C. Afterwards, cells were washed with ice cold PBS containing 2% FCS and resuspended in prewarmed T-cell medium containing IL-7 and IL-15 (5 ng/mL each). Labeling efficiency was determined by flow cytometry. Afterwards, 5×104 stained cells were incubated with the antibodies and F(ab´)2 and analyzed at different time points by flow cytometry evaluating CTV-MFI of all 7-AAD- cells. Supernatants derived from co-incubation assays were analyzed for IFNγ by ELISA according to the manufacturer's instructions (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) as previously described 50.
Analysis of cytotoxic potential of T cells in vitro
Cytotoxic efficacy of specifically activated T cells in the presence of antibodies and F(ab´)2 was investigated by co-cultivation of TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM and ML2-B7 tumor cells. Cells were stained with 7-AAD and analyzed by flow cytometry in the presence of AccuCheck Counting Beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The total number of 7-AAD-GFP+ tumor cells/µL was calculated according to the manufacturer's instructions. The product of detected cells and the amount of beads/µL was related to the total number of beads detected. IFNγ secretion in the supernatant was determined by ELISA.
In vivo studies
F(ab´)2 of the most promising antibodies were tested in animal experiments following approval by the local government using a previously described mouse tumor model with NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG mice) (Figure S1A-B) 33,34. Briefly, ML2-B7 and ML2-B15 control tumor cells were injected subcutaneously into each flank of NSG mice. After seven days, the animals underwent total body irradiation with 0.5-1 Gy followed by intravenous injection of 2×106 TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM the next day. iRFP TCM or PBS injected mice served as controls. After 3 days, mice received either non-radiolabeled (200 µL PBS) or 89Zr-radiolabeled F(ab´)2 (20 µg in 200 µL PBS) intravenously. Size of tumors was determined daily by caliper measurement. For the in vivo functionality experiment, mice were injected intraperitoneally with irradiated (80 Gy) NSO-IL15 cells twice per week starting on the day of T-cell injection.
Preparation of 89Zr-labeled F(ab´)2
Conjugation and radiolabeling of F(ab´)2 were performed as previously described 33,34. For radiolabeling of F(ab')2, the p-isothiocanatobenzyl derivate of desferrioxamine (DFO-Bz-NCS, Macrocyclics, Inc., Richardson, TX) served as a bifunctional chelator for 89Zr. Chelator and F(ab´)2 were compounded in a molar ratio of 3:1, followed by purification of the immunoconjugate by size-exclusion chromatography (Sephadex G-25 M, PD10 column, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) and determination of the conjugation yield by a nanophotometer. The radiolabeling was performed according to a protocol of Perk and colleagues 55 with slight modifications as described elsewhere 33,34. For the in vivo studies, animals were injected intravenously with 0.7-1.5 MBq (10-20 µg) of 89Zr-radiolabeled F(ab´)2 in 0.25 M sodium acetate/gentisic acid 5 mg/mL buffer solution (pH 5.5).
PET/CT imaging
48 h after the injection of 89Zr-OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 or 89Zr-T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2, mice were anesthetized and imaging was performed with the Inveon small animal PET/CT scanner (Siemens, Knoxville, TN) as previously described 33,34. The CT scan was followed by 20-min static PET acquisition. A modified Feldcamp algorithm was used for reconstruction of CT images and 3-dimensional ordered subsets expectation maximum algorithm (OSEM3D/MAP) with a pixel size of 0.77 mm for the reconstruction of PET images. Fusion images were then created using the Inveon Research Workplace (Siemens, Knoxville, TN). Data were normalized and corrected for random, dead time, and decay with no correction for attenuation or scatter. To quantify tracer uptake, regions of interest were drawn based on the CT image and the activity accumulation referred as percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g, 1 cc = 1 g). Pictures are shown as 3D-maximum intensity projections (MIP) of co-registered PET/CT images.
Ex vivo analysis
After imaging, the animals were killed, tumors and tissues were weighted, and activity in respective tissues was measured by the gamma counter 2480Wizard2 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). The percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g) was calculated and depicted as ratio to blood uptake. Tumors and organs were homogenized, erythrocytes were lysed (ACK lysis buffer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), and cells were stained and analyzed by flow cytometry for human T cells (CD45+CD3+GFP-7-AAD- or CD45+CD5+GFP-7-AAD-), TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM (CD45+CD3+iRFP+GFP-7-AAD-), and tumor cells (CD45+GFP+7-AAD-). The number of cells was expressed in relation to all 7-AAD- cells.
Histology and immunohistochemistry
On the day of imaging, tumor tissues were collected for immunohistochemistry. These mouse tissues were fixed in 4% neutral-buffered formalin solution for 48 h, dehydrated under standard conditions (ASP300S, Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany), and embedded in paraffin. Serial 2-µm sections prepared with a rotary microtome (HM355S, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) were collected and subjected to histological and immunohistochemical analysis.
Hematoxylin-eosin (H.-E.) staining was performed on deparaffinized sections with eosin and Mayer's haemalaun according to a standard protocol (data not shown).
Immunohistochemistry was performed using a Bond RXm system (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) with the anti-human CD2 (clone EPR6451, dilution 1:250, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and anti-human CD7 (clone EPR4242, dilution 1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or for a double staining anti-CD3 (clone SP7, dilution 1:250, Zytomed Systems, Berlin, Germany) and anti-cleaved caspase 3 (clone 5A1, dilution 1:300, Cell Signaling, Danvers, USA). Briefly, slides were deparaffinized using deparaffinization solution, pretreated with Epitope retrieval solution 1 (corresponding to citrate buffer, pH 6) for 30 min. Antibody binding was detected with a polymer refine detection kit without post primary reagent and visualized with DAB as a dark brown precipitate. The double staining of anti-CD3/anti-cleaved caspase 3 was performed as described by sequential staining procedure. Briefly, after application of the anti-CD3 antibody and visualization with DAB, anti-cleaved caspase3 antibody was applied and visualized with Fast Red as chromogen.
Counterstaining was done with hematoxylin. In addition, we performed immunohistochemistry with a BenchMark XT automated stainer (Ventana, Tucson, AZ) for anti-human CD3 antibody (clone MRQ-39, Sigma-Aldrich), using the ultraVIEW DAB Detection Kit (all reagents from Ventana, Tucson, AZ). Briefly, the tissue sections were deparaffinized with EZ Prep at 75-76 °C, heat pretreated in Cell Conditioning 1 for antigen retrieval at 76-100 °C, and then incubated with the primary antibody diluted in antibody diluent 1:500 for 32 min at 37 °C after inactivation of the endogenous peroxidase using UV-inhibitor for 4 min at 37 °C. The slides were incubated with a HRP Universal Multimer for 8 min. Antibody binding was detected using DAB as chromogen and counterstained with hematoxylin for 10 min with subsequent bluing in bluing reagent for 10 min.
Slides were then dehydrated manually by alcohol washes of increasing concentration (70%, 96%, and 100%) and xylene and coverslipped using Pertex® mounting medium (Histolab, Goeteborg, Sweden). The stained slides were evaluated by an experienced certified pathologist (K.S.) using a BX53 stereomicroscope (Olympus, Shinjuku, Japan) and scanned using a slide scanner (AT-2, Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Representative images were collected using the AperioImagescope software (version 12.3, Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
Statistical analysis
Mean ± standard deviation (±SD) and unpaired t-tests were calculated using GraphPad Prism software version 5.01 (San Diego, CA). Normal distribution of data was confirmed by probability plots using MiniTab trial software (State Collage, PE). P-values of <0.05 were set as statistically significant and indicated in figure legends.
Results
CD2 and CD7 are highly expressed on different T-cell subsets and upregulated on specifically activated T cells
Focusing on a specific pan T-cell marker, we investigated CD2, CD3, and CD7 as potential target antigens for T-cell tracking regarding their suitability for diagnostic immuno-PET. First, expression of these antigens was analyzed on different T-cell populations (Figure 1A, Figure S2A-B and Table S1-S2), as well as various other blood cell components such as B cells, NK cells, and monocytes (Figure S3). CD2 was highly expressed on TCM. CD7 and CD3 showed especially high expression on TN (Figure 1A). Although the expression pattern of the target structures was similar for different donors, the MFI on T-cell subpopulations varied (data not shown).
The expression of these markers on specifically activated T cells was determined by co-incubation of TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM or control iRFP TCM with ML2 tumor cells bearing either the restriction element HLA-B7 (ML2-B7) or the irrelevant HLA-B15 (ML2-B15) molecule. Analysis of CD2 and CD7 expression after co-cultivation with respective target cells demonstrated that specific activation of T cells led to strong induction of CD2 and moderate enhancement of CD7, whereas CD3 expression was reduced (Figure 1B).
Subsequently, we selected various antibody clones directed against these three target structures. OKT11 (anti-CD2), T3-3A1, and 4H9 (both anti-CD7), as well as OKT3, VIT3b, and BC3 (all anti-CD3) were tested for their effect on the viability of PBMC-derived T cells. These in vitro studies on non-activated T cells revealed induction of apoptosis for all selected anti-CD3 antibodies (Figure S4A), but for none of the anti-CD2 and anti-CD7 antibodies. IFNγ levels in supernatants corresponded with these findings, indicating T-cell stimulation by all anti-CD3 antibodies, whereas the IFNγ level after incubation with anti-CD2 and anti-CD7 antibodies was comparable to the isotype control (Figure S4B).
OKT11 (anti-CD2) and T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) IgG and F(ab´)2 show specific, high-affinity binding to PBMC-derived T cells resulting in partial internalization
Based on the in vitro results, we selected OKT11 (anti-CD2) antibody (OKT11 (anti-CD2)-IgG) and T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) antibody (T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-IgG) to further characterize immunotracer candidates for in vivo T-cell imaging. The CD3-specific antibody OKT3 served as positive control. We isolated the full antibodies from respective hybridoma supernatants and F(ab´)2 were produced because of their general superiority with respect to in vivo pharmacokinetics. Purity was validated by size-exclusion HPLC and binding was verified by ELISA. Although isolated OKT11 (anti-CD2)-IgG showed one peak reflecting IgG1 (Figure S5A-B), we detected two isotype subclasses, IgG1 and IgG2a, for T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-IgG (Figure S5A-B). Blocking experiments using flow cytometry confirmed the specific detection of human CD7 by both isolated isotype subclasses (Figure S5C).
Flow cytometry analysis of IgG and respective F(ab´)2 showed specific binding to PBMC-derived T cells with a Kd in the range of 10-8 M (Figure 2A). We observed internalization after stimulation especially for T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) IgG and F(ab´)2. In contrast, OKT11 (anti-CD2) IgG and F(ab´)2 showed only slight internalization of the receptor molecule (Figure 2B).
OKT11 (anti-CD2) and T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) IgG and F(ab´)2 do not affect viability, IFNγ production, and proliferative capacity of PBMC-derived T cells
After determining general characteristics of the selected IgG and F(ab´)2, we investigated their functional effect on non-activated PBMC-derived T cells. Different concentrations of OKT11 (anti-CD2) and T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) IgG and F(ab´)2 revealed no enhancement of apoptosis on PBMC-derived T cells (Figure 3A). Similarly, the corresponding IFNγ levels showed no difference to respective isotype controls independent from concentration (Figure 3B) or different time points (Figure S6). Additionally, proliferative capacity of PBMC-derived T cells in the presence of the tested proteins did not differ from the isotype control (Figure 3C), whereas addition of OKT3 (anti-CD3)-IgG led to enhanced proliferation (Figure 3C). Potential dilution effects deriving from the IgG1/IgG2a mixture of the T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) IgG or F(ab´)2 were excluded by determination of proliferation capacity and IFNγ secretion with two-fold concentrations showing comparable results (Figure S7A-C).
T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) does not impair functionality of specifically activated TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM, whereas co-incubation with OKT11 (anti-CD2) results in slightly modulated T-cell function
We then investigated the influence of the selected antibodies and F(ab´)2 on specific cytotoxicity of T cells against tumor cells. IgG and F(ab´)2 were added to a co-culture of TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM and GFP+ ML2-B7 tumor cells. iRFP TCM and GFP+ ML2-B15 tumor cells served as controls. The percentage of tumor cells was strongly reduced for TCR2.D6iRFP TCM incubated with isotype IgG and F(ab´)2, indicating a strong cytotoxic activity of specifically activated T cells (Figure 4A). Incubation with T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) IgG or F(ab´)2 showed comparable results. In case of OKT11 (anti-CD2) IgG and F(ab´)2, the percentage of tumor cells was slightly enhanced, suggesting an impairment of cytotoxic T-cell activity (Figure 4A). In addition, specifically activated TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM showed slightly higher IFNγ levels in supernatants for OKT11 (anti-CD2) IgG and F(ab´)2 compared to the isotype in contrast to T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) IgG and F(ab´)2 (Figure 4B). Taken together, statistically significant differences were observed in single but not all experiments for full IgG and F(ab´)2.
In vivo imaging using 89Zr-labeled OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 and T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2 showed a distinct signal of T cells at the tumor site
Based on the lack or only minor functional impairment of T cells after co-incubation with OKT11 (anti-CD2) and T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) IgG and F(ab´)2, we tested the potential of 89Zr-labeled F(ab´)2 to track T cells in vivo in a previously described myeloid sarcoma model of adoptive T-cell transfer (Figure S1A; 33, 34). PET images showed a distinct signal of T cells at the site of the MHC-matched antigen-expressing tumor for both tracers, whereas no signal was detected in the MHC-mismatched antigen-expressing control tumor (Figure 5A). Biodistribution analyses of isolated organs confirmed the imaging results revealing enhanced tracer uptake especially in the ML2-B7 tumor and in the spleen for 89Zr-OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 and 89Zr-T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2 (Figure 5B and Table S3-S4). The organ-to-blood ratios were comparable for both tracers (Figure 5C). For the control tumor ML2-B15, radioactive uptake was not enhanced at the same level as in mice that had not received T cells (Figure 5B-C). Of note, flow cytometric analysis of selected organs showed the presence of T cells in ML2-B7 tumor and spleen of animals injected with 89Zr-T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2 as expected (Figure 5D), whereas T cells were quantitatively reduced especially in the spleen of animals injected with 89Zr-OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 (Figure 5D).
Ex vivo tissue staining shows T cells expressing CD2 and CD7 at the specifically detected tumor site but reveals less effective tumor-cell cytotoxic activity in samples derived from OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 in contrast to T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2-injected mice
The presence of T cells expressing CD2 and CD7 in ML2-B7 tumor tissue harvested from mice on the imaging day was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. We detected CD2 and CD7 expression comparable to conventional CD3 on T cells within the ML2-B7 tumor from mice injected with 89Zr-OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 and 89Zr-T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2, respectively (Figure 6A). In ML2-B15 tumors, only single T cells were detectable as expected. We additionally performed staining for cleaved caspase 3 to investigate T-cell functionality in vivo. We observed substantially reduced cleaved caspase 3 positive tumor cells adjacent to infiltrating T cells in 89Zr-OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 compared to 89Zr-T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2 injected mice, indicating an impaired T-cell function in vivo (Figure 6B).
Animals injected with T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2 successfully reject ML2-B7 tumors, whereas OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 administration results in failure of tumor rejection
We then investigated the long-term effects of respective F(ab´)2 administration on T-cell functionality in vivo. Therefore, we analyzed ML2-B7 tumor growth within NSG mice that had been co-injected with TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM and, analogous to the imaging setting described above, the same dose of OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2, T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2, or isotype-F(ab´)2 as control (Figure S1B). After an initial growth phase, T cells of mice injected with T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2 and isotype-F(ab´)2 were able to reject MHC-matched tumors efficiently. In contrast, the administration of OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 led to failure of tumor rejection (Figure 7A). ML2-B15 control tumors were not rejected independent of the F(ab´)2 treatment. Eleven days after TCM injection, the tumor weight from OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2-treated mice was significantly higher than that of mice receiving T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2 or isotype-F(ab´)2 (Figure 7B). These results correspond to flow cytometry data showing a strong reduction of T cells within the ML2-B7 tumor 11 days after TCM transfer for the group injected with OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 (Figure 7C). This was similarly observed in the spleen, and by trend in the blood. Of note, we have not observed depletion of T cells within the lungs and bone marrow in animals injected with OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 (Figure 7C). Equivalent results were obtained investigating specific TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM in OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 injected animals (Figure 7D).
In vivo imaging with 89Zr-T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2 detects tumor-reactive T cells specifically at the tumor site
Because CD7 represents a pan T-cell marker expressed also on non-stimulated T cells, T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2 may also bind to nonspecific T cells in vivo. We therefore explored how reliably tumor-specific T cells can be detected in comparison to non-tumor-specific T cells in vivo. TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM and iRFP TCM were injected into tumor-bearing mice (Figure S1A). After the application of 89Zr-T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2 and PET imaging, we detected a strong signal at the ML2-B7 tumor site in mice receiving tumor-specific TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM, but not in mice receiving nonspecific iRFP TCM (Figure 8A). Ex vivo biodistribution analysis confirmed these imaging results, showing higher 89Zr-uptake in the ML2-B7 tumor in animals receiving TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM and an enhanced organ-to-blood ratio compared to the control group (Figure 8B-C). Flow cytometric analysis validated these data. T cells, in general, and TCR2.5D6iRFP T cells were enhanced in ML2-B7 tumors of TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM-treated mice (Figure 8D-E), corresponding to a reduction of GFP+ ML2-B7 tumor cells (Figure 8F).
Discussion
Immunotherapies have recently demonstrated a high efficacy in various malignant diseases, and the variety of treatment strategies and distinguishable response patterns is constantly extending. In contrast to many conventional targeted or chemotherapies, overall survival is considered a far more important endpoint than progression-free survival, indicating the value of potentially improved long-term survival of patients treated with immunotherapies 56. Imaging technologies represent one of the most important surrogate markers in oncology. 18FDG-PET/CT, routinely used to evaluate response to cancer treatment, can detect immunotherapeutic responses including early ones due to its high resolution 15,16. However, the broad spectrum of responses to immunotherapies, including pseudo-progression is often difficult to assess 12-14. Furthermore, distinction between primary and secondary immune resistance at later time points can currently only be assessed following disease progression and biopsy. Thus, novel imaging technologies are essential for better understanding, as well as early modification and adjustment of therapies, especially in tumor entities harboring more therapeutic options.
Several novel technologies have been tested in preclinical and in a few clinical settings with respect to response assessment of immunotherapeutic treatments. Adoptive transfer of T cells genetically modified by CAR or TCR facilitates simultaneous integration of reporter genes to track transferred T cells by addition of respective tracer substrates within in vivo mice studies 18-21 and clinically 22. Similarly, TCR-transgenic T cells with a murinized part of the TCRβ chain are detectable by a respective antibody and F(ab´)2 33,34. However, these approaches fail to evaluate immunotherapies inducing endogenous immune responses, such as immune checkpoint modulators or vaccination approaches 1,57,58. To detect T cells directly at the tumor site, T-cell-associated markers as cell-derived secreted granules, such as granzyme B, have been targeted 59, or T-cell-selective [18F]fluoro-9-β-D-arabinofuranosylguanine ([18F]F-AraG) has been applied 60. Granzyme B-based PET imaging allowed differentiation between responders and non-responders in a mouse model of checkpoint modulation 59, but detailed functional analyses are missing, although antibodies against other T-cell-secreted granules such as TNFα are known to possess potent immunosuppressive activity 61. [18F]F-AraG was shown to detect activated T cells in an acute graft-versus-host disease model 60. However, beside high liver background, in vitro or in vivo experiments investigating T-cell function following tracer application have not been published so far.
The most direct approach to visualize T cells in the tumor environment would be targeting specific surface markers on T cells. Several groups have recently investigated those as potential targets for antibody-derived tracers and immuno-imaging technologies, showing their suitability as surrogate markers to distinguish between responders and non-responders in the course of immunotherapy 24-31. A more detailed functional characterization has been performed for an anti-murine CD4 cys-diabody by Freise and colleagues who investigated CD4 expression and proliferation of T cells at two different concentrations, revealing a dose-dependent decrease in CD4 expression and inhibition of proliferation 28. Recently, the application of a pan T-cell marker, an anti-murine CD3 antibody, was reported to modulate the distribution of T-cell subsets in vivo, reducing CD4+ T cells and stimulating CD8+ TCM and TEFF31. Although long-term effects were not investigated, the study further emphasizes the relevance of functional analyses during the clinical translation of imaging technologies.
In this study, we performed an in-depth analysis for several pan T-cell-specific antibodies with the aim to identify one that does not modulate T-cell-related immune responses and would be suitable for diagnostic immuno-imaging with respect to immunotherapies potentially affecting different T-cell subpopulations 35-41. Primarily, antibodies specific for CD2, CD3, and CD7 were selected. CD3 is a fundamental co-stimulator involved in TCR signaling and full anti-CD3 antibodies tested here in the in vitro experiments all demonstrated an unspecific modulation of T-cell function as previously reported 52,53,62,63. Moreover, bivalent and monovalent anti-CD3 F(ab) constructs have been demonstrated to modulate T-cell function in vivo 64-66. This target was, therefore, not further investigated. In contrast, targeting of CD2 and CD7 showed no major functional modulation in vitro, except for a slight impact on specifically activated T cells, which was observed for anti-CD2 targeting. Nevertheless, we continued investigating OKT11 (anti-CD2) and T3-3A1 (anti-CD7) IgG and F(ab´)2 as potential imaging tracers in vivo.
CD2, expressed on T cells, NK cells, and thymocytes, plays a role in T-cell adhesion via CD58 and T-cell signaling 42-46. CD2 expression highly correlates with cytolytic activity in tumors in the context of immune checkpoint modulation 47, making this target especially interesting to track effector T cells. Three immunoglobulin-like domains are described as target structures for murine antibodies. While T11.1 is mainly involved in the interaction with CD58, T11.3 is only accessible upon activation 67,68. Single targeting of T11.1 or T11.2 by antibodies is supposed to be non-mitogenic, whereas a co-application with an anti-T11.3 antibody results in T-cell stimulation 68. OKT11 (anti-CD2)-IgG, binding the T11.1 epitope, was then selected for our experiments 69. Previously, a functional impact of anti-CD2 targeting on T cells including OKT11 had been reported; however, these effects seem to be dose dependent and occur in a specific timely relation to T-cell priming 70-73. In our experiments, we observed a high binding of this antibody to specifically activated T cells and TCM. Although apoptosis, proliferation, and IFNγ response of labeled T cells were not affected in short-term T-cell assays using nonspecifically stimulated T cells in vitro, specific tumor lysis and IFNγ secretion were slightly modulated. In contrast, cytotoxic reactivity and tumor rejection capacity were strongly affected in our in vivo model, allowing tumor growth similar to the positive control tumors lacking the defined HLA-restriction element. Additionally, T cells were eliminated in tumors and the spleen of these animals. These results may be explained by a direct cytotoxic effect of OKT11 upon TCR activation as previously described for anti-CD2-specific antibodies including OKT11 full antibody 70,73. Thus, T-cell antigens involved in T-cell signaling or function should be employed with caution for diagnostic imaging purposes. In addition, our study demonstrates the importance of testing tracer candidates in a well-characterized model of tumor rejection in vivo prior to clinical translation.
Our data indicate favorable properties of CD7 as target structure for T-cell imaging. CD7, also a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, is a marker of early-stage lymphocytes and hematopoietic precursor cells, as well as mature T cells and NK cells 48. Furthermore, CD7 has shown an enhanced expression on naive and memory cells 49. We observed an enhanced expression of CD7 after specific TCR stimulation and our T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2 tracer provided an effective and selective imaging of CD7+ T cells at the tumor site picturing the accumulation of specific T cells within the tumor. Although the function of this molecule is not well understood, it seems less essential for T-cell function as CD7-deficient animals present no major T-cell dysfunction 74,75. In fact, CD7-binding did not impair T-cell function in vitro and did not impact tumor rejection in our in vivo model. Modification of de novo induction of antigen-specific cytotoxic immune responses, as observed in CD7-deficient animals 75, is likely not relevant for transient CD7 immunotracking. Because our tumor model uses NSG mice lacking any human immune cells, further in vivo testing is required such as investigating the detrimental effects of CD7 targeting in an animal model with an established human immune system. However, CD7 targeting has already been performed clinically using anti-CD7 immunotoxins in patients with T-cell lymphoma 76. The immunotoxin showed some efficacy and safety with vascular leak syndrome, representing the main dose limiting toxicity likely associated to tumor lysis which would not be relevant in a diagnostic setting. These data indicate that targeting of CD7 is feasible. Moreover, CD7-directed CARs have been developed to treat T-cell lymphoma and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia with promising preclinical data in gene-edited CD7- T cells supporting the therapeutic potential for CD7 targeting in T-cell malignancies 77. Thus, anti-CD7 antibody constructs may have theranostic value if labeled with respective radionuclides.
Further development of this diagnostic approach is needed for clinical application. We used F(ab´)2 fragments in our experiments to exclude any potential Fc-mediated functional T-cell modulation. Based on our well-established model, we used 89Zr for labeling of F(ab´)2 fragments for the preclinical investigation of the novel approaches 33,34. 89Zr is certainly not the ideal isotope to be used, because of the difference between the half-life of 89Zr (78.4 h; 78) and the biological blood half-life of F(ab´)2 (24-48 h; 79). However, due to an Eβ+max of 0.9 MeV and intrinsic spatial resolution loss of 1 mm, 89Zr emits a suitable PET signal at the time point selected for the presented study 78. In addition, the maximum energy emitted by 89Zr (902 KeV) implies that the travel distance of an emitted positron in tissue is relatively short before annihilation, thus providing high-resolution images suitable for small target structure distribution investigation, such as tumor infiltrating T cells, as shown previously 33,34. Furthermore, the use of 89Zr to radiolabel F(ab´)2 fragments 80 and even smaller molecules such as cys-diabodies 28 is reported to provide good contrast images. Using our tracer, we observed extensive uptake of 89Zr-OKT11 (anti-CD2)-F(ab´)2 and 89Zr-T3-3A1 (anti-CD7)-F(ab´)2 in the kidneys. For the clinical translation of this imaging method, the co-administration of cationic amino acid solutions or basic polypeptides might be necessary to reduce renal uptake and to avoid abnormal radioactive exposure of the kidneys 81.
Our target-oriented approach identified a suitable T-cell tracer applicable for diagnostic T-cell imaging without impacting T-cell function. Based on our results, immunotracers using these targets can be further optimized; for instance, by using monovalent antibody-derived constructs. When a target and an optimized construct are identified, a suitable radioisotope should be selected, and the novel tracer will need to be again tested for specificity, feasibility, and safety including detailed dosimetry in the subsequent clinical translation process 82.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we hereby show that in-depth functional analyses of T cells are essential to safely develop clinically relevant T-cell tracers for diagnostic imaging. We reveal noninvasive CD7 immuno-imaging as a highly promising strategy to track T-cell responses in the context of diverse immunotherapies in vivo, with additional theranostic potential in T-cell-mediated diseases.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB824/C10) (A.M.K., C.D.). The authors thank Francesco De Rose for support in labeling, Stephanie Rämisch, Sibylle Reder, and Markus Mittelhäuser for excellent other technical support and Johannes Stöckl (Institute of Immunology, Medical University Vienna) for providing the VIT3b (anti-CD3)-IgG.
Contributions
K.E.M. and S.M. performed in vitro experiments; K.E.M., S.M., and D.G. performed in vivo experiments; N.Y. and L.R. did radiolabeling and HPLC analysis; K.S. designed, performed and analyzed histology and immunohistochemistry; H.O.B., S.A., and E.B. supported in vivo studies; R.W. designed the in vitro apoptosis assay; A.S. performed immunohistochemistry staining; F.B., W.W., W.W., and M.S. reviewed the manuscript; K.E.M., S.M., and A.M.K. designed studies; K.E.M., S.M., N.Y., E.B., S.A., C.A., and A.M.K. analyzed and interpreted experimental data; K.E. M., S.M., and A.M.K. made the figures; K.E.M., S.M., C.A., and A.M.K. wrote the manuscript; F.B., W.W., W.W., M.S., C.D., and A.M.K. contributed with administrative duties, database construction, technical and material support; A.M.K. and C.D. supervised the study.
Abbreviations
- 7-AAD
7-aminoactinomycine
- CAR
chimeric antigen receptor
- CT
computed tomography
- CTV
CellTrace Violet
- ELISA
enzyme-linked immunesorbent assay
- [18F]F-AraG
[18F]fluoro-9-β-D-arabinofuranosylguanine
- 18F-FDG-PET
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission-tomography
- GFP
enhanced green fluorescent protein
- GM
geometric mean
- iRFP TCM
iRFP transduced TCM
- Kd
dissociation constant
- MFI
mean fluorescence intensity
- MIP
maximum intensity projections
- ML2-B7
HLA-B*07:02
- ML2-B15
HLA-B*15:01
- NSG mice
NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ mice
- OD
optical density
- PacBl
Pacific-Blue
- PBMC
peripheral blood mononuclear cells
- RECIST
response evaluation criteria in solid tumors
- SD
standard deviation
- SE-HPLC
size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography
- TCM
central memory T cells
- TEFF
effector T cells
- TN
naive T cells
- TReg
regulatory T cells
- TCR
T-cell receptor
- TCR2.5D6iRFP TCM
2.5D6 linked to red fluorescent protein transduced TCM
- TCRmu
TCR with a murinized domain
- 89Zr
zirconium-89.
References
- 1.Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R. et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:23–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L. et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1627–39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Grupp SA, Kalos M, Barrett D. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1509–18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Porter DL, Levine BL, Kalos M, Bagg A, June CH. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:725–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR. et al. Cancer regression in patients after transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes. Science. 2006;314:126–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1129003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Robbins PF, Kassim SH, Tran TL. et al. A pilot trial using lymphocytes genetically engineered with an NY-ESO-1-reactive T-cell receptor: long-term follow-up and correlates with response. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:1019–27. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Audehm S, Krackhardt AM. Specific adoptive cellular immunotherapy in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Oncol Res and Treat. 2017;40:691–6. doi: 10.1159/000484051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Johnson LA, Morgan RA, Dudley ME. et al. Gene therapy with human and mouse T-cell receptors mediates cancer regression and targets normal tissues expressing cognate antigen. Blood. 2009;114:535–46. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-211714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schwartz LH, Litiere S, de Vries E. et al. RECIST 1.1-Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee. Eur J Cancer. 2016;62:132–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wolchok JD, Hoos A, O'Day S. et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7412–20. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A. et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:e143–52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30074-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wong ANM, McArthur GA, Hofman MS, Hicks RJ. The advantages and challenges of using FDG PET/CT for response assessment in melanoma in the era of targeted agents and immunotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:67–77. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3691-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cho SY, Lipson EJ, Im HJ. et al. Prediction of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy using early-time-point (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with advanced melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1421–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.188839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cheson BD, Ansell S, Schwartz L. et al. Refinement of the Lugano Classification lymphoma response criteria in the era of immunomodulatory therapy. Blood. 2016;128:2489–96. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-05-718528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Monitoring of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors using PET-CT. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s00262-018-2229-6. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Seith F, Forschner A, Schmidt H. et al. 18F-FDG-PET detects complete response to PD1-therapy in melanoma patients two weeks after therapy start. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:95–101. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3813-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.von Eyben FE, Baumann GS, Baum RP. PSMA diagnostics and treatments of prostate cancer become mature. Clin Transl Imaging. 2018;6:145–8. doi: 10.1007/s40336-018-0270-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dobrenkov K, Olszewska M, Likar Y. et al. Monitoring the efficacy of adoptively transferred prostate cancer-targeted human T lymphocytes with PET and bioluminescence imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1162–70. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.047324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vedvyas Y, Shevlin E, Zaman M. et al. Longitudinal PET imaging demonstrates biphasic CAR T cell responses in survivors. JCI Insight. 2016;1:e90064. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.90064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Najjar AM, Manuri PR, Olivares S. et al. Imaging of sleeping beauty-modified CD19-specific T cells expressing HSV1-thymidine kinase by positron emission tomography. Mol Imaging Biol. 2016;18:838–48. doi: 10.1007/s11307-016-0971-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McCracken MN, Vatakis DN, Dixit D, McLaughlin J, Zack JA, Witte ON. Noninvasive detection of tumor-infiltrating T cells by PET reporter imaging. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:1815–26. doi: 10.1172/JCI77326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Keu KV, Witney TH, Yaghoubi S, Reporter gene imaging of targeted T cell immunotherapy in recurrent glioma. Sci Transl Med; 2017. p. 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kanwar B, Gao DW, Hwang AB. et al. In vivo imaging of mucosal CD4+ T cells using single photon emission computed tomography in a murine model of colitis. J Immunol Methods. 2008;329:21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tavare R, Escuin-Ordinas H, Mok S. et al. An effective immuno-PET imaging method to monitor CD8-dependent responses to immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2016;76:73–82. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tavare R, McCracken MN, Zettlitz KA. et al. Engineered antibody fragments for immuno-PET imaging of endogenous CD8+ T cells in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:1108–13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316922111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tavare R, McCracken MN, Zettlitz KA. et al. Immuno-PET of murine T cell reconstitution postadoptive stem cell transplantation using anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 cys-diabodies. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1258–64. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.153338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rashidian M, Ingram JR, Dougan M. et al. Predicting the response to CTLA-4 blockade by longitudinal noninvasive monitoring of CD8 T cells. J Exp Med. 2017;214:2243–55. doi: 10.1084/jem.20161950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Freise AC, Zettlitz KA, Salazar FB, Lu X, Tavare R, Wu AM. ImmunoPET imaging of murine CD4+ T cells using anti-CD4 Cys-Diabody: Effects of protein dose on T cell function and imaging. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017;19:599–609. doi: 10.1007/s11307-016-1032-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Griessinger CM, Maurer A, Kesenheimer C. et al. 64Cu antibody-targeting of the T-cell receptor and subsequent internalization enables in vivo tracking of lymphocytes by PET. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:1161–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418391112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Larimer BM, Wehrenberg-Klee E, Caraballo A, Mahmood U. Quantitative CD3 PET imaging predicts tumor growth response to anti-CTLA-4 therapy. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1607–11. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.173930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Beckford Vera DR, Smith CC, Bixby LM. et al. Immuno-PET imaging of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes using zirconium-89 radiolabeled anti-CD3 antibody in immune-competent mice bearing syngeneic tumors. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0193832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Olafsen T, Torgov M, Zhang GG. et al. Pet imaging of cytotoxic human T cells using an 89Zr-labeled anti-CD8 minibody. J Immunother Cancer. 2015;3:P388. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mall S, Yusufi N, Wagner R. et al. Immuno-PET imaging of engineered human T cells in tumors. Cancer Res. 2016;76:4113–23. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yusufi N, Mall S, Bianchi HO. et al. In-depth characterization of a TCR-specific tracer for sensitive detection of tumor-directed transgenic T cells by immuno-PET. Theranostics. 2017;7:2402–16. doi: 10.7150/thno.17994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kreiter S, Vormehr M, van de Roemer N. et al. Mutant MHC class II epitopes drive therapeutic immune responses to cancer. Nature. 2015;520:692–6. doi: 10.1038/nature14426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Davids MS, Kim HT, Bachireddy P. et al. Ipilimumab for patients with relapse after allogeneic transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:143–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hoepner S, Loh JM, Riccadonna C. et al. Synergy between CD8 T cells and Th1 or Th2 polarised CD4 T cells for adoptive immunotherapy of brain tumours. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Church SE, Jensen SM, Antony PA, Restifo NP, Fox BA. Tumor-specific CD4+ T cells maintain effector and memory tumor-specific CD8+ T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2014;44:69–79. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sommermeyer D, Hudecek M, Kosasih PL. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells derived from defined CD8+ and CD4+ subsets confer superior antitumor reactivity in vivo. Leukemia. 2016;30:492–500. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mattes J, Hulett M, Xie W. et al. Immunotherapy of cytotoxic T cell-resistant tumors by T helper 2 cells: an eotaxin and STAT6-dependent process. J Exp Med. 2003;197:387–93. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Trzonkowski P, Bieniaszewska M, Juscinska J. et al. First-in-man clinical results of the treatment of patients with graft versus host disease with human ex vivo expanded CD4+CD25+CD127- T regulatory cells. Clin Immunol. 2009;133:22–6. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bierer BE, Barbosa J, Herrmann S, Burakoff SJ. Interaction of CD2 with its ligand, LFA-3, in human T cell proliferation. J Immunol. 1988;140:3358–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hahn WC, Burakoff SJ, Bierer BE. Signal transduction pathways involved in T cell receptor-induced regulation of CD2 avidity for CD58. J Immunol. 1993;150:2607–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hunig T, Tiefenthaler G, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH, Meuer SC. Alternative pathway activation of T cells by binding of CD2 to its cell-surface ligand. Nature. 1987;326:298–301. doi: 10.1038/326298a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Howard FD, Ledbetter JA, Wong J, Bieber CP, Stinson EB, Herzenberg LA. A human T lymphocyte differentiation marker defined by monoclonal antibodies that block E-rosette formation. J Immunol. 1981;126:2117–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Moingeon P, Chang HC, Wallner BP, Stebbins C, Frey AZ, Reinherz EL. CD2-mediated adhesion facilitates T lymphocyte antigen recognition function. Nature. 1989;339:312–4. doi: 10.1038/339312a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rooney MS, Shukla SA, Wu CJ, Getz G, Hacohen N. Molecular and genetic properties of tumors associated with local immune cytolytic activity. Cell. 2015;160:48–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Stillwell R, Bierer BE. T cell signal transduction and the role of CD7 in costimulation. Immunol Res. 2001;24:31–52. doi: 10.1385/ir:24:1:31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Aandahl EM, Sandberg JK, Beckerman KP, Tasken K, Moretto WJ, Nixon DF. CD7 is a differentiation marker that identifies multiple CD8 T cell effector subsets. J Immunol. 2003;170:2349–55. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.5.2349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Klar R, Schober S, Rami M. et al. Therapeutic targeting of naturally presented myeloperoxidase-derived HLA peptide ligands on myeloid leukemia cells by TCR-transgenic T cells. Leukemia. 2014;28:2355–66. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Berger C, Jensen MC, Lansdorp PM, Gough M, Elliott C, Riddell SR. Adoptive transfer of effector CD8+ T cells derived from central memory cells establishes persistent T cell memory in primates. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:294–305. doi: 10.1172/JCI32103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Van Wauwe JP, De Mey JR, Goossens JG. OKT3: a monoclonal anti-human T lymphocyte antibody with potent mitogenic properties. J Immunol. 1980;124:2708–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chang TW, Testa D, Kung PC, Perry L, Dreskin HJ, Goldstein G. Cellular origin and interactions involved in gamma-interferon production induced by OKt3 monoclonal antibody. J Immunol. 1982;128:585–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Li N, Hill KS, Elferink LA. Analysis of receptor tyrosine kinase internalization using flow cytometry. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;457:305–17. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-261-8_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Perk LR, Vosjan MJ, Visser GW. et al. p-Isothiocyanatobenzyl-desferrioxamine: a new bifunctional chelate for facile radiolabeling of monoclonal antibodies with zirconium-89 for immuno-PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:250–9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1263-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C. et al. Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1889–94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.2736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hodi FS, O'Day SJ, McDermott DF. et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Weber JS, D'Angelo SP, Minor D. et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:375–84. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70076-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Larimer BM, Wehrenberg-Klee E, Dubois F. et al. Granzyme B PET imaging as a predictive biomarker of immunotherapy response. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2318–27. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ronald JA, Kim BS, Gowrishankar G. et al. A PET imaging strategy to visualize activated T cells in acute graft-versus-host disease elicited by allogenic hematopoietic cell transplant. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2893–902. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shealy DJ, Visvanathan S. Anti-TNF antibodies: lessons from the past, roadmap for the future. Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2008. pp. 101–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Holter W, Majdic O, Stockinger H, Knapp W. Analysis of T cell activation with a non-mitogenic anti CD3 antibody and the phorbol ester TPA. Clin Exp Immunol. 1985;62:600–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Anasetti C, Martin PJ, Storb R. et al. Treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease with a nonmitogenic anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody. Transplantation. 1992;54:844–51. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199211000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kohm AP, Williams JS, Bickford AL. et al. Treatment with nonmitogenic anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody induces CD4+ T cell unresponsiveness and functional reversal of established experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2005;174:4525–34. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.4525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sarangi PP, Kim B, Rouse BT. Non-mitogenic anti-CD3F(ab')2 monoclonal antibody: a novel approach to control herpetic stromal keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5425–33. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Juraske C, Wipa P, Morath A. et al. Anti-CD3 Fab fragments enhance tumor killing by human gammadelta T cells independent of Nck recruitment to the gammadelta T cell antigen receptor. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1579. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bierer BE, Hahn WC. T cell adhesion, avidity regulation and signaling: a molecular analysis of CD2. Semin Immunol. 1993;5:249–61. doi: 10.1006/smim.1993.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Meuer SC, Hussey RE, Fabbi M. et al. An alternative pathway of T-cell activation: a functional role for the 50 kd T11 sheep erythrocyte receptor protein. Cell. 1984;36:897–906. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90039-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Verbi W, Greaves MF, Schneider C. et al. Monoclonal antibodies OKT 11 and OKT 11A have pan-T reactivity and block sheep erythrocyte "receptors". Eur J Immunol. 1982;12:81–6. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830120115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gückel B, Berek C, Lutz M, Altevogt P, Schirrmacher V, Kyewski BA. Anti-CD2 antibodies induce T cell unresponsiveness in vivo. J Exp Med. 1991;174:957–67. doi: 10.1084/jem.174.5.957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Xu Y, Kolber-Simonds D, Hope JA. et al. The anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody BTI-322 generates unresponsiveness by activation-associated T cell depletion. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004;138:476–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02650.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Dumont C, Deas O, Mollereau B. et al. Potent apoptotic signaling and subsequent unresponsiveness induced by a single CD2 mAb (BTI-322) in activated human peripheral T cells. J Immunol. 1998;160:3797–804. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Van Wauwe J, Goossens J, Decock W, Kung P, Goldstein G. Suppression of human T-cell mitogenesis and E-rosette formation by the monoclonal antibody OKT11A. Immunology. 1981;44:865–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Bonilla FA, Kokron CM, Swinton P, Geha RS. Targeted gene disruption of murine CD7. Int Immunol. 1997;9:1875–83. doi: 10.1093/intimm/9.12.1875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lee DM, Staats HF, Sundy JS. et al. Immunologic characterization of CD7-deficient mice. J Immunol. 1998;160:5749–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Frankel AE, Laver JH, Willingham MC, Burns LJ, Kersey JH, Vallera DA. Therapy of patients with T-cell lymphomas and leukemias using an anti-CD7 monoclonal antibody-ricin A chain immunotoxin. Leuk Lymphoma. 1997;26:287–98. doi: 10.3109/10428199709051778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Gomes-Silva D, Srinivasan M, Sharma S. et al. CD7-edited T cells expressing a CD7-specific CAR for the therapy of T-cell malignancies. Blood. 2017;130:285–96. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-01-761320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Zhang Y, Hong H, Cai W. PET tracers based on Zirconium-89. Curr Radiopharm. 2011;4:131–9. doi: 10.2174/1874471011104020131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Goldenberg DM. Targeted therapy of cancer with radiolabeled antibodies. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:693–713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sham JG, Kievit FM, Grierson JR. et al. Glypican-3-targeting F(ab')2 for 89Zr PET of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:2032–7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.145102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Behr TM, Goldenberg DM, Becker W. Reducing the renal uptake of radiolabeled antibody fragments and peptides for diagnosis and therapy: present status, future prospects and limitations. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:201–12. doi: 10.1007/s002590050216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bailey DL, Pichler BJ, Guckel B. et al. Combined PET/MRI: Global warming-summary report of the 6th international workshop on PET/MRI, March 27-29, 2017, Tübingen, Germany. Mol Imaging Biol. 2018;20:4–20. doi: 10.1007/s11307-017-1123-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.