Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2018 Dec 19;13(12):e0208240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208240

Epidemiology and treatment patterns of rheumatoid arthritis in a large cohort of Arab patients

Soha R Dargham 1,#, Sumeja Zahirovic 1,#, Mohammed Hammoudeh 2, Samar Al Emadi 2, Basel K Masri 3, Hussein Halabi 4, Humeira Badsha 5, Imad Uthman 6, Ziyad R Mahfoud 1, Hadil Ashour 2, Wissam Gad El Haq 2, Karim Bayoumy 2, Marianthi Kapiri 1, Richa Saxena 7,8, Robert M Plenge 8,9, Layla Kazkaz 10, Thurayya Arayssi 1,*
Editor: Domenico Paolo Emanuele Margiotta11
PMCID: PMC6300286  PMID: 30566451

Abstract

Objectives

There is limited information on the epidemiology and treatment patterns of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) across the Arab region. We aim in this study to describe the demographic characteristics, clinical profile, and treatment patterns of patients of Arab ancestry with RA.

Methods

This is a cross sectional study of 895 patients with established rheumatoid arthritis enrolled from five sites (Jordan, Lebanon, Qatar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), and United Arab Emirates). Demographic characteristics, clinical profile, and treatment patterns are compared between the five countries.

Results

The majority of our patients are women, have an average disease duration of 10 years, are married and non-smokers, with completed secondary education. We report a high (>80%) ever-use of methotrexate (MTX) and steroids among our RA population, while the ever-use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and TNF-inhibitors average around 67% and 33%, respectively. There are variations in RA treatment use between the five country sites. Highest utilization of steroids is identified in Jordan and KSA (p-value < 0.001), while the highest ever-use of TNF-inhibitors is reported in KSA (p-value < 0.001).

Conclusion

Disparities in usage of RA treatments among Arab patients are noted across the five countries. National gross domestic product (GDP), as well as some other unique features in each country likely affect these. Developing treatment guidelines specific to this region could contribute in delivering standardized therapies to RA patients.

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease associated with progressive joint damage and disability [1]. The prevalence of RA in Northern Europe and North America is estimated at 0.5–1%, and is expected to increase as populations age and mortality decreases [24]. In spite of this low prevalence, RA is ranked as the 42nd highest attributable disease to global disability [5], with a two-fold higher morbidity among women compared to men [6]. Other determinants of RA disease include age, socioeconomic status (SES), and ethnicity [711].

In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, the epidemiology of RA remains poorly understood with a dearth of data on its prevalence and disease activity among Arab populations. A recent global burden study estimated RA prevalence in MENA region as among the lowest at 0.16% [6]. Based on limited evidence from several MENA regional studies [1215], RA disease severity and management appear to vary geographically in the region.

Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the mainstay treatment for RA prescribed to relieve joint pain and swelling, and to reduce disease activity and disability [16, 17]. Newer biologic agents are typically used in patients with severe unresponsive disease to the classical DMARDs [18, 19]. Although effective, they are significantly expensive, imposing a high economic individual and social burden [20].

In the context of limited data on the epidemiology of RA and its treatment patterns in the MENA region, we aim in the study to describe the demographic, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of patients with RA of Arab ancestry living in five Middle Eastern countries.

Materials and methods

Study design and sampling

This is a secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study of RA patients enrolled in the Genetics of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Some Arab States (GRASS) multicenter case-control study [21]. Data were collected between October 2012 and March 2016 from consecutive RA patients attending rheumatology outpatient clinics in Jordan, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), Lebanon, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). To participate in the study, patients had to be older than 18 years of age, of Arab ancestry by self-report, and diagnosed with RA according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria [22].

All the enrolled patients were adequately informed about the research and provided written consent prior to study enrollment. The study was approved by the ethics boards at all study sites. These include Jordan Hospital Institutional Review Board (Jordan), King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center Institutional Review Board (KSA), American University of Beirut Institutional Review Board (Lebanon), Hamad Medical Center Institutional Review Board and Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar Institutional Review Board (Qatar), and Dubai Scientific Research Ethics Committee (UAE). A questionnaire was completed by all patients and their physicians capturing sociodemographic and clinical data, including medical history of RA, limited comorbidities and medication use.

Outcomes and measures

Sociodemographic characteristics collected included self-reported ancestry, nationality, age, sex, education, and marital status. Self-reported ancestry was classified as Gulf, Levant, or Africa if three or more of the patients’ grandparents originated from the Arabian Gulf, Levant, or Africa regions, respectively; all other reported ancestry were grouped in the “other/mix” classification. Education was categorized into three groups: patients who completed primary education or none, middle or secondary school, and college or university education. Marital status was categorized as either never- or ever-married. Data on smoking status, frequency and duration (in years) for both cigarettes and shisha (narghileh) were collected and classified as never- or ever-smoked.

Information on age at diagnosis, duration of disease, presence of rheumatoid factor (RF) and /or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP; antibody status), presence of comorbidities (coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, history of stroke, and type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM)), and the use of medications to treat RA were collected from the patients’ medical records. The use of medications was described as never- or ever-use for the following medications: methotrexate (MTX), DMARDs (antimalarial, leflunomide, and sulfasalazine), steroids, and TNF-inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab) and non-TNF-inhibitors (rituximab) biologics. The use of non-TNF-inhibitor biologics (rituximab) was minimal across all the sites and not included in the analysis. Information on other non-TNFi drugs (tocilizumab and abatacept) were not collected as these medications were not readily available in the countries when the study was initiated in 2012. This impeded us from systematically capturing such data.

Statistical analysis

Sample characteristics were summarized using frequency distributions except for patients’ age, age at diagnosis, and duration of disease for which the mean and standard deviation were calculated. Socio-demographic, smoking status, co-morbidities, and treatment patterns were compared between the five country sites using the Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. One way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare patients’ age, age at diagnosis, and duration of disease between the five country sites. For each of the different types of medication, bivariate and then multivariate logistic regressions were built to assess what factors were associated with their use. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) were reported along with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). Since UAE did not collect information on anti-CCP and RF, we conducted a sensitivity analysis excluding the UAE sample to factor anti-CCP and RF in the regression. Significance was defined at the 5% level. All analyses were done using IBM-SPSS version 24.0 (Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Sociodemographic and clinical profile

A total of 895 patients with RA were enrolled from the five participating sites. The majority were female (85%), ever-married (87.5%), and with at least middle or secondary school education (73%). About 42% and 39% reported the Gulf and Levant as their ancestry, respectively. The baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Overall demographic and clinical characteristics.

N %
Gender    
Male 135 15.1
Female 760 84.9
Marital Status    
Single 112 12.5
Ever-married 783 87.5
Education    
No formal education/Primary 245 27.4
Middle/Secondary School 341 38.1
University 309 34.5
Cigarette Smoking Status    
Never Smoked 717 80.1
Ever Smoked 178 19.9
Shisha Smoking Status    
Never Smoked 795 88.8
Ever Smoked 100 11.2
Self-Reported Ancestry    
Gulf 373 41.7
Levant 347 38.8
Africa 140 15.6
Other 35 3.9
Nationality    
Expats 285 31.8
Nationals 610 68.2
Coronary Artery Disease    
No 861 96.3
Yes 33 3.7
History of Stroke/TIA    
No 880 98.4
Yes 14 1.6
Peripheral Vascular Disease    
No 874 97.8
Yes 20 2.2
Diabetes Mellitus—Type II    
No 775 86.7
Yes 119 13.3

Across country sites, significant variability was noted in self-reported ancestry, disease duration, education, marital status, cigarette and shisha smoking, and presence of T2DM (Table 2). In Lebanon, Levant ancestry was most commonly reported by the patients, while Gulf ancestry was predominantly reported by patients in KSA (p-value < 0.001). Patients recruited from the UAE had the shortest mean disease duration as compared to patients recruited from other sites (p-value < 0.001). In terms of education, Qatar had the highest proportion of university educated subjects (significantly different only from UAE), and Lebanon had the highest proportion of middle/secondary school completion, significantly different from Jordan, Qatar and UAE but not KSA (p-value < 0.000). Patients recruited from Lebanon were more likely to be single (p-value < 0.001) and to smoke compared to patients from Jordan, KSA, and Qatar (p-value = 0.004). T2DM was most frequently reported in patients recruited from KSA, followed by patients from Qatar, Jordan, Lebanon and UAE (p-value < 0.001). Lebanon had the highest proportions of recruited patients with untested anti-CCP and RF and accounted for the lowest proportions of subjects with positive anti-CCP (p-value < 0.001) and RF (p-value < 0.001) compared to Jordan, KSA, and Qatar.

Table 2. Demographic and clinical characteristics by country site.

Jordan, N = 206 KSA,
N = 149
Lebanon, N = 133 Qatar, N = 266 UAE,
N = 141
P-value
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Age           0.173
Mean; Std. Dev 48.95 (13.95) 50.04 (12.63) 48.79 (14.27) 48.75 (12.19) 46.28 (13.32)  
Age at Diagnosis           0.752
Mean; Std. Dev 39.33 (13.37) 38.72 (12.54) 39.22 (13.99) 39.22 (12.23) 40.69 (12.98)  
Duration of Disease           <0.001*
Mean; Std. Dev 9.62 (8.46)e 11.33 (8.28)e 9.59 (9.75)e 9.53 (7.99)e 5.60 (7.29)  
Gender           0.091
Male 34 (16.5) 18 (12.1) 28 (21.1) 41 (15.4) 14 (9.9)  
Female 172 (83.5) 131 (87.9) 105 (78.9) 225 (84.6) 127 (90.1)  
Marital Status           0.004*
Single 22 (10.7)a,b 14 (9.4) b 30 (22.6)a 28 (10.5) b 18 (12.8) b  
Ever-married 184 (89.3) 135 (90.6) 103 (77.4) 238 (89.5) 123 (87.2)  
Education           <0.001*
No formal education/Primary 50 (24.3) b 58 (38.9)a 17 (12.8) b 60 (22.6) b 60 (42.6)a  
Middle/Secondary School 91 (44.2) a,b 45 (30.2) b 67 (50.4)a 95 (35.7) b 43 (30.5) b  
University 65 (31.6)a 46 (30.9) a 49 (36.8) a 111 (41.7) a 38 (27.0)  
Cigarette Smoking Status           <0.001*
Never Smoked 151 (73.3)b 132 (88.6)a 78 (58.6)c 226 (85.0) a 130 (92.2) a  
Ever Smoked 55 (26.7) 17 (11.4) 55 (41.4) 40 (15.0) 11 (7.8)  
Shisha Smoking Status           <0.001*
Never Smoked 179 (86.9)a,b 138 (92.6)a 101 (75.9)c 249 (93.6) a 128 (90.8) a  
Ever Smoked 27 (13.1) 11 (7.4) 32 (24.1) 17 (6.4) 13 (9.2)  
Coronary Artery Disease           0.092
No 196 (95.1) 140 (94) 129 (97.7) 256 (96.2) 140 (99.3)  
Yes 10 (4.9) 9 (60) 3 (2.3) 10 (3.8) 1 (0.7)  
History of Stroke/TIA           0.128
No 201 (97.6) 144 (96.6) 131 (99.2) 263 (98.9) 141 (100)  
Yes 5 (2.4) 5 (3.4) 1 (0.8) 3 (1.1) 0 (0)  
Peripheral Vascular Disease           0.173
No 202 (98.1) 147 (98.7) 125 (94.7) 259 (97.4) 141 (100)  
Yes 4 (1.9) 2 (1.3) 7 (5.3) 7 (2.6) 0 (0)  
Diabetes Mellitus—Type II           <0.001*
No 182 (88.3)b 111 (74.5)c 120 (90.9)a,b 225 (84.6)b,c 137 (97.2)a  
Yes 24 (11.7)e 38 (25.5) 12 (9.1) 41 (15.4) 4 (2.8)
Ancestry           <0.001*
Gulf 43 (20.9)c 130 (87.2)a 1 (0.8)d 123 (46.2)b 76 (53.9)b  
Levant 138 (67.0)b 4 (2.7)d 126 (94.7)a 44 (16.5)c 35 (24.8)c  
Africa 24 (11.7)b 4 (2.7)c 2 (1.5)c 83 (31.2)a 27 (19.1)a,b  
Other 1 (0.5)b 11 (7.4)a 4 (3.0)a,b 16 (6.0)a 3 (2.1)a,b  
Nationality           <0.001*
Expats 82 (39.8)a 0 (0.0) 15 (11.3) 133 (50.0)a 55 (39.0)a  
Nationals 124 (60.2) 149 (100.0) 118 (88.7) 133 (50.0) 86 (61.0)  

*–p-value < 0.05

a,b,c,d,e–groups with similar letter are not statistically different; groups with different letter are statistically different.

RA treatment profile

Methotrexate (87.8%) and steroids (80.6%) were the most commonly ever-used medications across all sites. Around two thirds of patients ever-used DMARDs other than MTX. Only one third of patients ever- used TNF-inhibitors. Additionally, there were significant differences in the types of medication used between countries (Fig 1). Highest utilization of steroids was identified in Jordan and KSA (p-value < 0.001; Fig 1C), while highest ever-use of TNF-inhibitors was reported in KSA (p-value < 0.001; Fig 1B). The use of DMARDs was highest among female patients (p-value = 0.004) while MTX was more commonly used among male patients (p-value = 0.004; Fig 2B) and the use of both MTX and steroids increased with age (p-value < 0.001; Fig 2A). Apart from TNF-inhibitors, the only other biologic analyzed was rituximab. Its ever-use was higher in KSA, Lebanon and Qatar, in comparison to Jordan (p-value < 0.001). Patients with T2DM were twice as likely to have ever-used rituximab in adjusted analysis. Further, RF was also associated with rituximab ever-use. No other predictive factors were associated with rituximab ever-use (results not shown).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Percentage for ever-use of A) DMARDs, B) TNF-inhibitors, C) steroids, and D) methotrexate among Arab rheumatoid arthritis patients across five country sites.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

A) Age- and B) Sex-specific trends of treatment utilization among 895 Arab rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Adjusted analysis (Table 3) showed that the use of methotrexate was significantly positively associated with duration of disease, male sex, and living in KSA, Lebanon, and Qatar as compared to Jordan while the use of steroids was negatively associated with university education level and living in Qatar, Lebanon, and the UAE as compared to Jordan. The use of non-biologic DMARDs among RA patients was significantly associated positively with duration of disease and female sex, while negatively with T2DM and living in all four countries compared to Jordan. The use of TNF-inhibitors was significantly positively associated with duration of diagnosis and country site (all four countries compared to Jordan) while negatively associated with ever-married marital status. The sensitivity analysis (excluding the UAE sample) showed that anti-CCP and RF had no effect on medication patterns (results not shown).

Table 3. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of rheumatoid arthritis treatments among Arab patients.

DMARDs TNF-inhibitors Methotrexate Steroids
  OR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI)
Age 0.99 (0.98–1.00) - 1.00 (0.99–1.01) - 1.03 (1.01–1.04)* - 1.03 (1.01–1.04)* -
Age at Diagnosis 0.97 (0.96–0.98)* 0.99 (0.97–1.00) 0.98 (0.97–0.99)* - 1.01 (0.99–1.02) - 1.00 (0.98–1.01) -
Duration of Disease 1.06 (1.04–1.08)* 1.05 (1.02–1.07)* 1.04 (1.03–1.06)* 1.05 (1.03–1.07)* 1.05 (1.03–1.08)* 1.05 (1.02–1.08)* 1.10 (1.07–1.14)* 1.07 (1.04–1.11)*
Female 1.71 (1.18–2.48)* 1.62 (1.09–2.40)* 1.17 (0.77–1.78) - 0.36 (0.18–0.73)* 0.33 (0.15–0.70)* 1.17 (0.75–1.83) -
Ever Married 1.16 (0.77–1.74) - 0.66 (0.43–1.00)* 0.58 (0.37–0.93)* 0.86 (0.48–1.52) - 2.12 (1.37–3.29)* 1.64 (0.97–2.76)
Education (vs. Non-schooling)            
Middle/secondary 1.49 (1.07–2.09)* 1.35 (0.92–1.99) 0.67 (0.46–0.97)* 0.88 (0.58–1.34) 1.26 (0.80–1.98) - 0.87 (0.56–1.35) 0.75 (0.44–1.26)
University 1.58 (1.12–2.24)* 1.45 (0.96–2.18) 1.12 (0.78–1.61) 1.41 (0.93–2.14) 1.18 (0.75–1.87) - 0.61 (0.40–0.94)* 0.03 (0.33–0.95)*
Cigarette Smoking 0.86 (0.61–1.20) - 0.64 (0.43–0.95)* 0.81 (0.52–1.25) 1.43 (0.87–2.35) - 1.58 (1.00–2.51)* 1.39 (0.82–2.36)
Coronary Artery Disease 0.81 (0.40–1.63) - 1.12 (0.52–2.38) - 2.86 (0.68–12.08) - 2.45 (0.74–8.11) -
Stroke 0.59 (0.21–1.71) - 0.42 (0.09–1.90_ - 0.65 (0.18–2.37) - 3.14 (0.41–24.17) -
Type II Diabetes 0.69 (0.46–1.01) 0.64 (0.41–0.99)* 1.41 (0.94–2.12)* 1.19 (0.75–1.89) 1.54 (0.84–2.82) - 1.90 (1.06–3.41)* 0.85 (0.43–1.66)
Country Site (Vs. Jordan)            
KSA 0.63 (0.40–1.00) 0.61 (0.38–0.99)* 8.24
(4.70–14.46)*
7.73
(4.33–13.80)*
9.98
(3.88–25.66)*
10.12
(3.88–26.41)*
0.71 (0.26–1.94)* 0.65 (0.23–1.79)
Lebanon 0.44 (0.28–0.71)* 0.41 (0.25–0.67)* 3.04 (1.65–5.59)* 2.95 (1.57–5.53)* 2.53 (1.38–4.66)* 2.75 (1.45–5.22)* 0.12 (0.05–0.26)* 0.12 (0.05–0.28)*
Qatar 0.67 (0.45–1.01) 0.65 (0.43–0.99)* 4.60 (2.71–7.79)* 4.51 (2.63–7.73)* 2.63 (1.61–4.28)* 2.79 (1.69–4.62)* 0.16 (0.08–0.35)* 0.16 (0.08–0.36)*
UAE 0.22 (0.14–0.35)* 0.24 (0.15–0.40)* 3.81 (2.12–6.86)* 4.73 (2.56–8.77)* 1.18 (0.71–1.95) 1.57 (0.92–2.67) 0.04 (0.02–0.90)* 0.05 0.02–0.10)*

*–p-value < 0.05

OR: odds ratio; aOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval

Discussion

Our cross-sectional study examined socio-demographic, clinical, and treatment profile of 895 RA patients of Arab ancestry recruited from five countries in the Middle East. The majority are women, have an average disease duration of 10 years, are married and non-smokers, with completed secondary education, and comorbidities consistent with what has been described in other populations in the world [23, 24]. Our population, however, and unlike patients reported in studies from North America and Europe, are about 10 years younger at the time of diagnosis. A potential explanation could be related to the lower average age of the population in the Middle Eastern countries [25]. However, genetic and environmental factors cannot be excluded. In the Middle East, consanguinity is high and can reach up to 50% in some countries [26], raising the question of genetic anticipation as a potential explanatory factors [27]. Other chronic diseases in the MENA region like breast cancer have a peak age that is about 2 decades younger than the peak age in the Western hemisphere [28, 29].

We observed a high ever-use of MTX and steroids among our patients with little variation across all centers, while the ever-use of DMARDs (other than MTX) and TNF-inhibitors significantly varied. This high prescription of MTX is a substantial improvement from prior reports [12] from the region reflecting acceptance and implementation of global guidelines [13, 3032].

The significant variations in the use of TNF-inhibitors amongst the sites is likely to be explained by the differences in the healthcare systems as well as patient factors. Total health expenditure per capita ranges from as low as USD 257 in Jordan to as high as USD 2,030 in Qatar [33] and access to TNF-inhibitors is likely to be affected not only by health expenditure but also by the national gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (ranging from USD 9,048 in Jordan to USD 127,481 in Qatar [34]) and the health insurance system. In KSA, Qatar, and UAE, all healthcare, including medications, is free or highly subsidized for nationals by the government, while expats living in the latter countries and nationals of Lebanon and Jordan have to pay out of pocket and pay high premium for health insurance to cover health care expenses. This was observed in other studies where European countries [20, 24, 35] with lower GDP had lesser use.

We established factors associated with the choice of RA treatment in our cohort. Increasing age of diagnosis is inversely associated with use of MTX in parallel to the pattern reported from the UK [36] and Sweden [37], and potentially explained by comorbidities and risk of toxicity. On the other hand, MTX use was associated with increasing age of the patient, implying that once the patient started MTX earlier in their life, they would remain taking it even later. Female sex is also associated with lower use of MTX, however not surprising as the patients in our study are women in their childbearing age and physicians are less likely to prescribe MTX due to its well-known association with congenital malformation in pregnant women [3841]. Interestingly, we identified higher educational status to be associated with higher use of DMARDs and lower use of steroids. These associations between socio-economic status and RA disease activity/duration and treatment is supported in the literature: RA patients with lower income had higher disease activity and lower initiations of DMARDs [10, 42]. As no information on socioeconomic status is collected in our study, the level of education could be perceived in our study as a proxy for socioeconomic status.

There are biases inherent to a cross-sectional analysis of a convenience sample. The prevalence of co-morbidities and medication use could be underestimated due to recall bias as the information could be missing from the patients’ medical records. Records were not maintained for eligible patients who refused participation, thus we are unable to evaluate the characteristics of those who refused to participate. In addition, there was a lack of a central lab to test for anti-CCP and RF to ensure the accuracy of those results. The missing data on anti-CCP and RF status precluded a complete clinical assessment of RA in our study population.

Despite these limitations, our study fills major gaps on RA epidemiology and characteristics pertaining to RA patients of Arab ancestry in the Middle East. Also, the novelty of our study lays in the description, investigation, and comparison of medication patterns between five nations of different GDP levels in the Eastern Mediterranean region.

In summary, this is the largest study of RA patients from the Middle East. Notable findings include younger age of onset of the disease and significant variations in treatment patterns amongst countries. Future studies should aim to address disease severity, remission rates as well as patient and physician treatment preferences. Lastly, developing region specific guidelines for RA treatment, could result in delivering equitable care to patients.

Supporting information

S1 File. RA_profile_treatment.

(SAV)

Acknowledgments

We would like to the following individuals for their help in patient recruitment and data management: Ms. Grace Aranki, Dr. Shymma El Ataway, Dr. Abdurahman Albeity, Ms Eman Bawazeer, Mr. Mohammad Habli, Dr. Saskia Mandy, Dr. Mira Merashli, Ms Marioneke Mook, Ms Rawan Shayboub, and Ms Zeinab Slim. In addition, we thank all of the patients and control subjects, without whom this study would not have been possible. Drs. Saxena, Plenge, Hammoudeh, Al Emadi, Masri, Halabi, Badsha, Uthman, Mahfoud, Kazkaz, and Arayssi are members of the Middle East Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium.

Data Availability

Our research was conducted across medical centers/hospital in 5 different countries. Ethical approval was received from all 5 sites, with an individual informed consent form (ICF) prepared according to each country's laws and policies. Three of the ICFs permit sharing the data and submitting them to the data online repository. Data from Lebanon, Qatar, and United Arab Emirates are available as Supporting Information files. However, authors would have to contact the Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar Institutional Review Board to request access to the data from the remaining sites with the imposed restriction on data sharing. They may contact Dr. Amal Robay, Director of Research Compliance, at amr2018@qatar-med.cornell.edu.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by National Priorities Research Program (grant 4-344-3-105 from the Qatar National Research Fund, a member of Qatar Foundation).

References

  • 1.Scott DL, Pugner K, Kaarela K, Doyle DV, Woolf A, Holmes J, et al. The links between joint damage and disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39(2):122–32. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alamanos Y, Drosos AA. Epidemiology of adult rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2005;4(3):130–6. 10.1016/j.autrev.2004.09.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Humphreys JH, Verstappen SM, Hyrich KL, Chipping JR, Marshall T, Symmons DP. The incidence of rheumatoid arthritis in the UK: comparisons using the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria and the 1987 ACR classification criteria. Results from the Norfolk Arthritis Register. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(8):1315–20. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hunter TM, Boytsov NN, Zhang X, Schroeder K, Michaud K, Araujo AB. Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in the United States adult population in healthcare claims databases, 2004–2014. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37(9):1551–7. 10.1007/s00296-017-3726-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095–128. Epub 2012/12/19. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Carmona L, Wolfe F, Vos T, et al. The global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1316–22. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204627 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Callahan LF, Pincus T. Formal education level as a significant marker of clinical status in rheumatoid arthritits. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 1988;31(11):1346–57. 10.1002/art.1780311102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jiang X, Sandberg ME, Saevarsdottir S, Klareskog L, Alfredsson L, Bengtsson C. Higher education is associated with a better rheumatoid arthritis outcome concerning for pain and function but not disease activity: results from the EIRA cohort and Swedish rheumatology register. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:317 10.1186/s13075-015-0836-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jordan JM. Effect of race and ethnicity on outcomes in arthritis and rheumatic conditions. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1999;11(2):98–103. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Putrik P, Ramiro S, Keszei AP, Hmamouchi I, Dougados M, Uhlig T, et al. Lower education and living in countries with lower wealth are associated with higher disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the multinational COMORA study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(3):540–6. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206737 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Symmons DP. Environmental factors and the outcome of rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;17(5):717–27. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Badsha H, Kong KO, Tak PP. Rheumatoid arthritis in the United Arab Emirates. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27(6):739–42. 10.1007/s10067-007-0782-z . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.El-Zorkany B, Mokbel A, Gamal SM, Mousa M, Youssef M, Hmamouchi I. Comparison of comorbidities of the Egyptian rheumatoid arthritis patients to the global cohort of the COMORA study: a post-hoc analysis. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(5):1153–9. 10.1007/s10067-015-3142-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Halabi H, Alarfaj A, Alawneh K, Alballa S, Alsaeid K, Badsha H, et al. Challenges and opportunities in the early diagnosis and optimal management of rheumatoid arthritis in Africa and the Middle East. Int J Rheum Dis. 2015;18(3):268–75. 10.1111/1756-185X.12320 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lutf A, Poil AR, Hammoudeh M. Characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Qatar: a cross-sectional study. Int J Rheum Dis. 2014;17(1):63–5. 10.1111/1756-185X.12135 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr., Akl EA, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016;68(1):1–25. 10.1002/acr.22783 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smolen JS, Landewe R, Bijlsma J, Burmester G, Chatzidionysiou K, Dougados M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):960–77. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Curtis JR, Singh JA. Use of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: current and emerging paradigms of care. Clin Ther. 2011;33(6):679–707. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.05.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pisetsky DS, Ward MM. Advances in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(2):251–61. 10.1016/j.berh.2012.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Putrik P, Ramiro S, Kvien TK, Sokka T, Pavlova M, Uhlig T, et al. Inequities in access to biologic and synthetic DMARDs across 46 European countries. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(1):198–206. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202603 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Saxena R, Plenge RM, Bjonnes AC, Dashti HS, Okada Y, Gad El Haq W, et al. A Multinational Arab Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies New Genetic Associations for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(5):976–85. 10.1002/art.40051 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31(3):315–24. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dougados M, Soubrier M, Antunez A, Balint P, Balsa A, Buch MH, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities in rheumatoid arthritis and evaluation of their monitoring: results of an international, cross-sectional study (COMORA). Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(1):62–8. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sokka T, Toloza S, Cutolo M, Kautiainen H, Makinen H, Gogus F, et al. Women, men, and rheumatoid arthritis: analyses of disease activity, disease characteristics, and treatments in the QUEST-RA study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(1):R7 10.1186/ar2591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Youth UNPo. Regional Overview: Youth in the Arab Region. 2011.
  • 26.Bittles AH. A Background Summary of Consanguineous Marriage. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bener A, Mohammad RR. Global distribution of consanguinity and their impact on complex diseases: Genetic disorders from an endogamous population. The Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2017;18:315–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hirko KA, Soliman AS, Hablas A, Seifeldin IA, Ramadan M, Banerjee M, et al. Trends in Breast Cancer Incidence Rates by Age and Stage at Diagnosis in Gharbiah, Egypt, over 10 Years (1999–2008). J Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;2013:916394 10.1155/2013/916394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Karim S, Ghalib H, Mohammed S, Fattah F. The incidence, age at diagnosis of breast cancer in the Iraqi Kurdish population and comparison to some other countries of Middle-East and West. International Journal of Surgery. 2015;13:71–5. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Moufarrej MN, Mahfoud Z, Badsha H. Barriers to achieving controlled rheumatoid arthritis in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35(4):759–63. 10.1007/s00296-014-3151-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Slimani S, Abbas A, Ben Ammar A, Kebaili D, Ali el H, Rahal F, et al. Characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis in Algeria: a multicenter study. Rheumatol Int. 2014;34(9):1235–9. 10.1007/s00296-014-2981-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Slimani S, Lukas C, Combe B, Morel J. Rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of malignancies: report from a French cohort. Joint Bone Spine. 2011;78(5):484–7. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.11.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Organization WH. Global Health Expenditure Database 2015 [March 7, 2018]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/nha/database/Select/Indicators/en.
  • 34.Bank TW. GDP per capita, PPP (current international $) 2016 [March 25, 2018]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?view=chart%2C&year_high_desc=true.
  • 35.Sokka T, Envalds M, Pincus T. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a global perspective on the use of antirheumatic drugs. Mod Rheumatol. 2008;18(3):228–39. Epub 2008/04/26. 10.1007/s10165-008-0056-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Grijalva C, Chung C, Stein C, Mitchel E, Griffin M. Changing patterns of medication use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a Medicaid population. Rheumatology. 2008;47(7):1061–4. 10.1093/rheumatology/ken193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Edwards CJ, Arden NK, Fisher D, Saperia JC, Reading I, Van Staa TP, et al. The changing use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis from the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44(11):1394–8. Epub 2005/07/21. 10.1093/rheumatology/kei024 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dawson AL, Riehle-Colarusso T, Reefhuis J, Arena JF, National Birth Defects Prevention S. Maternal exposure to methotrexate and birth defects: a population-based study. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A(9):2212–6. Epub 2014/06/06. 10.1002/ajmg.a.36625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Krause ML, Amin S, Makol A. Use of DMARDs and biologics during pregnancy and lactation in rheumatoid arthritis: what the rheumatologist needs to know. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2014;6(5):169–84. 10.1177/1759720X14551568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lloyd ME, Carr M, McElhatton P, Hall GM, Hughes RA. The effects of methotrexate on pregnancy, fertility and lactation. QJM. 1999;92(10):551–63. Epub 2000/01/11. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Weber-Schoendorfer C, Chambers C, Wacker E, Beghin D, Bernard N, Network of French Pharmacovigilance C, et al. Pregnancy outcome after methotrexate treatment for rheumatic disease prior to or during early pregnancy: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(5):1101–10. Epub 2014/01/29. 10.1002/art.38368 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yelin E, Tonner C, Kim SC, Katz JN, Ayanian JZ, Brookhart MA, et al. Sociodemographic, disease, health system, and contextual factors affecting the initiation of biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(7):980–9. Epub 2013/12/18. 10.1002/acr.22244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 File. RA_profile_treatment.

(SAV)

Data Availability Statement

Our research was conducted across medical centers/hospital in 5 different countries. Ethical approval was received from all 5 sites, with an individual informed consent form (ICF) prepared according to each country's laws and policies. Three of the ICFs permit sharing the data and submitting them to the data online repository. Data from Lebanon, Qatar, and United Arab Emirates are available as Supporting Information files. However, authors would have to contact the Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar Institutional Review Board to request access to the data from the remaining sites with the imposed restriction on data sharing. They may contact Dr. Amal Robay, Director of Research Compliance, at amr2018@qatar-med.cornell.edu.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES