Skip to main content
Clinical Medicine logoLink to Clinical Medicine
letter
. 2017 Oct;17(5):479–480. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-5-479a

An unusual case of orthopnea

Nathan Denham 1
PMCID: PMC6301930  PMID: 28974609

Editor – I read with interest the case of diaphragmatic paralysis presented by Keelan at al.1 As they stated in their article, an iatrogenic cause should be considered; however, one they failed to mention, which is important for the physician to be aware of, is following pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

The number of pulmonary vein isolations being performed is steadily increasing.2 At present, two main strategies exist: point by point ablation with radiofrequency energy or freezing using an expandable balloon catheter (cryoballoon). Although both are associated with phrenic nerve palsy, cryoballoon ablation has the higher complication rate reported over a number of studies (4.6–11.2% versus 0–0.3%).3 The majority of complications result in a temporary paralysis with an average recovery time of 4 months; however, permanent paralysis has been recognised.4 A right-sided unilateral palsy is the commonest reported because of the proximity of the right phrenic nerve to the right-sided pulmonary veins (especially the right superior vein). Intra-procedural phrenic nerve stimulation to monitor for complications during cryoballoon ablation has cut the rates of injury significantly5 and is routinely used at our centre.

Iatrogenic phrenic nerve palsy following pulmonary vein isolation can be easily overlooked as a potential cause both by the patient and clinician, particularly when the presentation is weeks after the procedure and our medical admissions units are frequented by breathless patients with exacerbations of chronic lung disease (personal experience). A higher index of suspicion should be employed, with earlier use of appropriate investigations.

Conflicts of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Keelan E. Kidney J. Judge EP. An unusual case of orthopnea. Clin Med. 2017;17:245–7. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-3-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Raatikainen MJP. Arnar DO. Merkely B, et al. Access to and clinical use of cardiac implantable electronic devices and interventional ­electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology Countries: 2016 Report from the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace. 2016;18(Suppl 3):iii1–iii79. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Georgiopoulos G. Tsiachris D. Manolis AS. Cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: a practical and effective approach. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40:333–42. doi: 10.1002/clc.22653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sacher F. Monahan KH. Thomas SP, et al. Phrenic nerve injury after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: characterization and outcome in a multicentre study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2498–503. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Okishige K. Aoyagi H. Kawaguchi N, et al. Novel method for earlier detection of phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon applications for electrical isolation of pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:1810–6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal College of Physicians

RESOURCES