Abstract
Background
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has demonstrated proven efficacy in some hematologic cancers. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of LCAR-B38M, a dual epitope-binding CAR T cell therapy directed against 2 distinct B cell maturation antigen epitopes, in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM).
Methods
This ongoing phase 1, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study enrolled patients (18 to 80 years) with R/R MM. Lymphodepletion was performed using cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2. LCAR-B38M CAR T cells (median CAR+ T cells, 0.5 × 106 cells/kg [range, 0.07 to 2.1 × 106]) were infused in 3 separate infusions. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of LCAR-B38M CAR T cells; the secondary objective is to evaluate the antimyeloma response of the treatment based on the general guidelines of the International Myeloma Working Group.
Results
At data cutoff, 57 patients had received LCAR-B38M CAR T cells. All patients experienced ≥ 1 adverse events (AEs). Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 37/57 patients (65%); most common were leukopenia (17/57; 30%), thrombocytopenia (13/57; 23%), and aspartate aminotransferase increased (12/57; 21%). Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 51/57 patients (90%); 4/57 (7%) had grade ≥ 3 cases. One patient reported neurotoxicity of grade 1 aphasia, agitation, and seizure-like activity. The overall response rate was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76 to 95); 39/57 patients (68%) achieved a complete response, 3/57 (5%) achieved a very good partial response, and 8/57 (14%) achieved a partial response. Minimal residual disease was negative for 36/57 (63%) patients. The median time to response was 1 month (range, 0.4 to 3.5). At a median follow-up of 8 months, median progression-free survival was 15 months (95% CI, 11 to not estimable). Median overall survival for all patients was not reached.
Conclusions
LCAR-B38M CAR T cell therapy displayed a manageable safety profile and demonstrated deep and durable responses in patients with R/R MM.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03090659; Registered on March 27, 2017, retrospectively registered
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s13045-018-0681-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Chimeric antigen receptor, CAR T, BCMA, Multiple myeloma, Relapsed, Refractory
Background
Multiple myeloma is a neoplasm of plasma cells that represents 13% of hematologic cancers and 1% of all cancers [1]. Despite the development of novel agents such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies that have significantly improved patient outcomes [2–10], multiple myeloma is still considered to be an incurable disease. The majority of patients will eventually relapse or become refractory to treatment; therefore, the development of new therapies for multiple myeloma remains a major unmet medical need [3].
B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily and represents an ideal target for multiple myeloma immunotherapy. BCMA is widely expressed on the surface of multiple myeloma cells, but has low expression on normal cells and no expression on CD34+ hematopoietic cells [11–14].
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has emerged as an efficacious treatment in some relapsed/refractory hematologic cancers. CAR T cell therapies have been approved in the US for the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and large B cell lymphoma based on the high level of durable remissions that were achieved [15–19]. In multiple myeloma, 2 phase 1 studies using CAR T cells targeting BCMA in heavily pretreated patients showed encouraging preliminary responses [20, 21]. In the CAR-BCMA study, of the 16/24 patients treated at the highest CAR T cell dose, 13 patients achieved a partial response (PR) or better, demonstrating an overall response rate (ORR) of 81% [20]. In updated results of the bb-2121 study (N = 43), an ORR of 95.5% was observed in the 22 evaluable patients treated with the highest CAR T cell dose range [21]. The promising efficacy shown in these preliminary studies suggests that BCMA-targeted CAR T cell therapy may be a viable approach in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
LCAR-B38M is a dual epitope-binding CAR T cell therapy directed against 2 distinct BCMA epitopes. The bi-epitope BCMA-binding moieties confer high avidity binding and distinguish LCAR-B38M from other BCMA CAR constructs. Here, we report results from the full data set of 57 patients from our study site’s clinical experience with an ongoing phase 1 study of LCAR-B38M CAR T cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Preliminary results of the first 35 patients treated at our site were presented at scientific meetings in 2017 [22].
Methods
Study design
A phase 1 trial of LCAR-B38M CAR T cells (LEGEND-2) has been explored at multiple centers in China, each with their own protocol for lymphodepletion and timing of CAR T cell administration. Study enrollment has ended at all 4 of these sites.
The analysis reported here represents the clinical experience (N = 57) from The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, which used cyclophosphamide alone as the lymphodepleting therapy and infused CAR T cells in 3 split doses. The study was initiated on March 30, 2016, and the analysis reported here is from a data cutoff date of February 6, 2018. A study schema is presented in Additional file 1.
Eligible patients were between 18 and 80 years of age with confirmed diagnosis of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Multiple myeloma was defined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria [23], and relapse was defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria [24].
All patients underwent leukapheresis to obtain peripheral blood mononuclear cells from which T cells were purified. CD3+ T cells were transduced with LCAR-B38M lentiviral vector to express anti-BCMA CAR (Additional file 2). The engineered T cells were further expanded ex vivo under interleukin-2 stimulation. Lymphodepletion using 3 doses of cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 on days − 5, − 4, and − 3 was followed by infusion of the engineered LCAR-B38M CAR T cells 5 days after the initiation of lymphodepletion chemotherapy. The total weight-adjusted CAR+ T cell dose (median, 0.5 × 106 cells/kg [range, 0.07 to 2.1 × 106]) was split into 3 infusions (20, 30, and 50% of total dose) administered over 7 days.
Objectives and assessments
The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of LCAR-B38M, and the secondary objective is to assess the antimyeloma activity of CAR T cell therapy. Adverse events (AEs) were identified and toxicity was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v.4.03. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was assessed using the modified criteria proposed by Lee et al. [25]. No prophylactic treatment was given for CRS.
Response assessments were based on the general guidelines from the IMWG [26, 27]. Disease evaluations were conducted using serum quantitative immunoglobulin or free light chain levels followed by immunofixation (serum and urine) and bone marrow biopsy/flow cytometry after normalization of serum quantitative immunoglobulin and free light chain levels. Two eight-color flow cytometry panels were used for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. The first panel included CD38, CD45, CD19, CD56, CD27, CD81, CD200, and CD20 antibodies. The second panel included CD38, CD138, CD19, CD45, CD117, and CD28 antibodies; cytoplasmic kappa and cytoplasmic lambda antibodies were used to assess clonality. Samples were analyzed on a Canto II flow cytometer (Becton Dickenson). The sensitivity of MRD assessment was up to 1 × 10−4.
BCMA expression was measured in malignant plasma cells from either bone marrow or plasmacytoma by flow cytometry. Whole blood was collected at serial time points to measure the number of LCAR-B38M CAR T cells using an exploratory quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Preliminary assay results were generated with a research grade real-time PCR assay, which represents a semi-quantitative assessment of CAR gene copy numbers over time.
Statistical analysis
The all-treated population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of LCAR-B38M CAR T cells and was used for all safety and efficacy analyses. Categorical variables were summarized using frequency counts and percentages. Continuous variables included the mean, standard deviation, median, and range (minimum and maximum) and were summarized using descriptive statistics.
The ORR was defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or PR, after receiving study treatment. Two-sided 95% exact confidence intervals (CIs) based on exact method of binomial distribution were calculated for each response category. The median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival and corresponding 95% CI were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
Patients
At data cutoff (February 6, 2018), 57 patients were enrolled in the study site and had received LCAR-B38M CAR T cell therapy. The median age was 54 years (range, 27 to 72), and more men (60%) were enrolled in the study (Table 1). The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 1 to 9), including prior proteasome inhibitor therapy (68%), immunomodulatory agents (86%), and both proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents (60%; Table 1). At the time of enrollment, 37% of patients had stage III disease as assessed by the International Staging System. The median duration of follow-up for all patients was 8 months (range, 0.7 to 20.7). Due to clinical practice differences, refractoriness could not be systematically assessed by the study physician.
Table 1.
Demographics and baseline disease characteristics
| Total (N = 57) | |
|---|---|
| Age, n (%) | |
| < 65 | 46 (81) |
| ≥ 65 | 11 (19) |
| Mean (SD) | 55 (9) |
| Median (range) | 54 (27 to 72) |
| Sex, n (%) | |
| Male | 34 (60) |
| Female | 23 (40) |
| ECOG performance status, n (%) | |
| 0 | 21 (37) |
| 1 | 27 (47) |
| 2 | 9 (16) |
| ISS stage, n (%) | |
| I | 15 (26) |
| II | 14 (25) |
| III | 21 (37) |
| Unknown | 7 (12) |
| Type of myelomaa, n (%) | |
| IgG | 25 (44) |
| IgA | 15 (26) |
| Light chain | 17 (30) |
| Kappa | 7 (12) |
| Lambda | 10 (18) |
| Time from initial MM diagnosis, years | |
| Mean (SD) | 4 (2) |
| Median (range) | 4 (1 to 9) |
| Number of prior lines of therapy, n | |
| Mean (SD) | 3 (2) |
| Median (range) | 3 (1 to 9) |
| Autologous stem cell transplantation, n (%) | 10 (18) |
| Prior therapies, n (%) | |
| Proteasome inhibitors | 39 (68) |
| Bortezomib | 39 (68) |
| Carfilzomib | 1 (2) |
| Immunomodulatory agents | 49 (86) |
| Lenalidomide | 25 (44) |
| Pomalidomide | 2 (4) |
| Thalidomide | 39 (68) |
| Proteasome inhibitors + immunomodulatory agents | 34 (60) |
ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, IgA immunoglobulin A, IgG immunoglobulin G, ISS International Staging System, SD standard deviation
aThe type of myeloma was assessed per International Myeloma Working Group criteria for diagnosis of multiple myeloma [23]
Safety
AEs were reported in all patients. The most common (≥ 40%) AEs of any grade were pyrexia (91%), CRS (90%), thrombocytopenia (49%), and leukopenia (47%; Table 2). Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 37 patients (65%); the most common (≥ 20%) grade ≥ 3 events were leukopenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (23%), and aspartate aminotransferase increased (21%).
Table 2.
Adverse events that occurred in at least 10% of patients
| AE, n (%) | All grade | Grades 1–2 | Grade ≥ 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pyrexia | 52 (91) | 41 (72) | 11 (19) |
| Cytokine release syndromea | 51 (90) | 47 (83) | 4 (7) |
| Thrombocytopenia | 28 (49) | 15 (26) | 13 (23) |
| Leukopenia | 27 (47) | 10 (18) | 17 (30) |
| AST increased | 22 (39) | 10 (18) | 12 (21) |
| Anemia | 17 (30) | 7 (12) | 10 (18) |
| Hypotension | 12 (21) | 9 (16) | 3 (5) |
| ALT increased | 10 (18) | 10 (18) | 0 |
| Cough | 10 (18) | 10 (18) | 0 |
| Disseminated intravascular coagulation | 10 (18) | 9 (16) | 1 (2) |
| Hypocalcemia | 9 (16) | 7 (12) | 2 (4) |
| Hyponatremia | 8 (14) | 5 (9) | 3 (5) |
| Dyspnea | 6 (11) | 6 (11) | 0 |
| Nausea | 6 (11) | 6 (11) | 0 |
ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase
aCytokine release syndrome assessed using modified criteria by Lee et al. [25]
CRS, assessed according to Lee et al. criteria [25], was mostly grades 1 (47%) and 2 (35%); 4 patients (7%) had grade 3 cases (Table 2). Liver function abnormalities, particularly aspartate aminotransferase increased, were the most common signs of end organ injury among patients with CRS (Table 3). Coagulopathies were also observed in patients who had CRS. Among patients who had CRS and available laboratory assessments, prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time and decreased fibrinogen occurred in 67 and 37% of patients, respectively. Kidney, pulmonary, and vascular system abnormalities were less frequent (2 to 35%) than those observed for the liver (Table 3).
Table 3.
End organ abnormalities among patients with cytokine release syndrome
| Total patients with CRS (N = 51) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| All grades | Grades 1–2 | Grades 3–4 | |
| Liver | |||
| ALT high | 25 (49) | 24 (47) | 1 (2) |
| AST high | 40 (78) | 23 (45) | 17 (33) |
| Bilirubin high | 22 (43) | 22 (43) | 0 |
| Kidney | |||
| Creatinine high | 18 (35) | 15 (29) | 3 (6) |
| Pulmonary and vascular systems | |||
| Hypotension | 12 (24) | 9 (18) | 3 (6) |
| Hypoxia | 4 (8) | 4 (8) | 0 |
| Respiratory failure | 1 (2) | 0 | 1 (2) |
| Coagulopathya | |||
| aPTT prolonged | 31 (67) | 28 (61) | 3 (7) |
| Fibrinogen decreased | 17 (37) | 0 | 17 (37) |
ALT alanine aminotransferase, aPTT activated partial thromboplastin time, AST aspartate aminotransferase, CRS cytokine release syndrome
aOnly 46 patients had laboratory test results available (N = 46 was used as the denominator)
The median time to onset of any grade CRS was 9 days (range, 1 to 19). Tocilizumab (46%), vasopressor (11%), and supplemental oxygen (35%) were used to manage the CRS. One patient, who had received a dose of 1.8 × 106 CAR+ T cells/kg, developed grade 2 CRS. While the CRS was resolving, the patient developed sudden onset of respiratory distress 22 days after receiving the first dose of CAR T cells. The patient required intubation for ventilator support and died 1 h later with cause of death reported as grade 5 pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndrome. The intubation was performed as part of final resuscitation efforts and not specifically to treat the CRS. Except for the patient who had grade 5 AEs, all CRS events resolved, with a median duration of 9 days (range, 3 to 57).
Neurotoxicity was observed in 1 patient, dosed at 1.0 × 106 CAR+ T cells/kg, who developed grade 1 aphasia, agitation, and seizure-like activity. The patient was treated with 10 mg diazepam, and the events resolved within 1 day.
Efficacy
In total, 50 of 57 patients responded; the ORR was 88% (95% CI, 76 to 95). CR was achieved by 39 patients (68%; 95% CI, 55 to 80), VGPR was achieved by 3 patients (5%; 95% CI, 1 to 15), and PR was achieved by 8 patients (14%; 95% CI, 6 to 26; Fig. 1a). MRD was negative for 36/57 patients (63%; 95% CI, 49 to 76), as assessed by bone marrow eight-color flow cytometry assay, and all MRD negative patients achieved CR. The median time to initial response was 1 month (range, 0.4 to 3.5).
Fig. 1.
Efficacy assessments of LCAR-B38M. a Individual patient response and duration of follow-up for patients who achieved at least a PR (n = 50). b One patient manifested extramedullary myeloma and wide subcutaneous metastasis. Examination on day 1, day 19, and day 84 after LCAR-B38M CAR T cell infusion showed regression of the subcutaneous metastases. c CT scans of a patient with an extramedullary lesion beside the thoracic vertebrae and severe pleural effusion at baseline and at week 3 and week 8 following LCAR-B38M CAR T cell infusion. It should be noted that the patient received thoracentesis intermittently before the CAR T treatment but did not receive thoracentesis or intrathoracic injection of drugs after treatment
LCAR-B38M CAR T cells also demonstrated activity in patients with extramedullary disease, with observed decreases in tumor mass (Fig. 1b, c).
At data cutoff, 10 patients (20%) who achieved a PR or better subsequently progressed. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median duration of response was 14 months (95% CI, 12 to not estimable). The median progression-free survival was 15 months (95% CI, 11 to not estimable; Fig. 2a). Six patients died during the study due to disease progression (n = 4), suicide after disease progression (n = 1), and pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndrome (n = 1). The median overall survival was not reached (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2.
Progression-free survival and overall survival. a The Kaplan-Meier curve for progression-free survival for all treated patients. The median progression-free survival was 15 months (95% CI, 11 to not estimable). b The Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival for all treated patients. The median overall survival was not reached. The dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals
BCMA expression and clinical response
Among the patients with BCMA expression data, 26/53 (49%) had < 40% BCMA expression and 27/53 (51%) had ≥ 40% BCMA expression (Additional file 3). BCMA expression did not appear to correlate with clinical response. An ORR of 92% was observed in patients with < 40% BCMA expression compared with an ORR of 82% in patients with ≥ 40% BCMA expression. Correlation between BCMA expression and median PFS or OS was not observed. Median PFS was 15 months for patients who had < 40% BCMA expression and 11 months for patients who had ≥ 40% BCMA expression. Median OS was not reached for both the < 40 and ≥ 40% BCMA expression groups (Additional file 3).
Exposure and persistence of LCAR-B38M CAR T cells
The median number of total CAR+ T cells infused was 32.3 × 106 (range, 3.3 to 126.2 × 106). The body weight-adjusted median number of CAR+ T cells administered was 0.5 × 106 cells/kg (range, 0.07 to 2.1 × 106). The overall incidence and severity of CRS was higher with increasing median LCAR-B38M CAR T cell dose; however, the small number of patients with higher grade events limits the interpretation of the data. There was no clear relationship between LCAR-B38M CAR T cell dose and disease response (Additional file 4).
Among the patients who had blood samples for analysis (n = 31), the majority had peak levels of LCAR-B38M signal greater than 1 × 104 copies/μg genomic DNA following infusion. LCAR-B38M CAR T cells in most patients (71%) were not detectable (signal below the lower limit of detection) in peripheral blood at 4 months, and only 5 patients showed CAR T cell persistence up to 10 months (Additional file 5).
Biomarkers
Serum interleukin-6 increased transiently within the first month following LCAR-B38M CAR T cell infusion. The peak levels of interleukin-6 increased with severity of CRS (Additional file 6). Similar results were observed with interleukin-2, interleukin-8, interleukin-10, and tumor necrosis factor alpha.
Infusion of LCAR-B38M CAR T cells resulted in a rapid reduction of serum immunoglobulin levels in all patients. IgA and IgG levels eventually increased for some patients who also had disease progression (Additional file 7).
Discussion
In this analysis of an ongoing phase 1, first-in-human clinical study, LCAR-B38M, a CAR T cell therapy directed against 2 distinct BCMA epitopes, displayed a manageable safety profile and demonstrated durable responses in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
CRS occurred in 90% of patients and were mostly grades 1 and 2 (83%), with 4 (7%) grade 3 cases. The overall response rate was 88%, and 39 patients (68%) achieved CR at a median follow-up of 8 months (range, 0.7 to 20.7).
All cases of CRS started with pyrexia with a median time to onset of 9 days (range, 1 to 19) after the first infusion of LCAR-B38M CAR T cells, suggesting that careful monitoring for fever during the first several days following CAR T cell infusion could be used in future studies to identify patients likely to require additional support for the CRS.
Cytopenias (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia) were common (54%); prolonged grade 4 cytopenias with duration exceeding 35 days occurred in 16% of patients. Infection AEs were reported, although the rate (9%) did not exceed that expected for patients with multiple myeloma [28].
Time to response was rapid, with a median time of 1 month (range, 0.4 to 3.5). Consistent efficacy was observed across all subgroups examined, including prior autologous stem cell transplant, age, number of prior therapies, and prior proteasome and immunomodulatory agent treatment. Ten responders (20%) progressed or died at data cutoff.
BCMA expression did not appear to correlate with clinical response and was highly variable, as has been described by others [20]. In the dose expansion phase of the bb-2121 study, BCMA expression is not an eligibility requirement, suggesting that clinical response might be independent of BCMA expression levels.
This was an exploratory study conducted to evaluate the effects of different preconditioning chemotherapy and treatment regimens for LCAR-B38M. Because this was the first clinical experience with LCAR-B38M, cyclophosphamide alone, rather than cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine, was used as the preconditioning treatment for safety considerations. Typically, CAR T cell therapy has a broad range of efficacious doses, and it is not uncommon for CAR T cell studies to start without a dose escalation phase. The dose used in our study was determined by both the sponsor and the investigator. Several factors were considered to determine the dose for each patient: the patient’s disease status, overall condition prior to infusion, and available total CAR T cells manufactured.
In this study, the median age of patients was 54 years, which is consistent with reported differences in the median age at diagnosis between Chinese and Western patients with multiple myeloma (59 vs. 70 years, respectively) [1, 29, 30]. Taking the median age of patients into consideration, a median of 3 prior lines of therapy and ISS stage III disease in 37% of patients suggest that the patients in this study had advanced myeloma.
The 88% ORR observed in this study was higher than that observed with CAR-BCMA [20, 31]. Among the 10 patients treated at the lowest dose of 0.3 × 106 CAR-BCMA CAR+ T cells/kg, only 2 patients (20.0%) achieved PR or better. For the 16 patients treated at the highest dose of 9 × 106 CAR-BCMA CAR+ T cells/kg, 13 (81%) achieved PR or better [20, 31]. The observed difference in response may be related to the design of the CAR and the dose of CAR+ T cells infused. The CAR-BCMA design incorporates a 11D-5-3 single anti-BCMA single chain variable region, a CD28 costimulatory domain, and a CD3ζ T cell activation domain [20, 31] and is different from the design of LCAR-B38M, which binds to 2 distinct BCMA epitopes. Although it is not possible to compare across studies, the efficacious doses used in the CAR-BCMA study were also considerably higher than those of LCAR-B38M used in this study (median dose of 0.5 × 106 CAR+ T cells/kg [range, 0.07 to 2.10 × 106]).
The bb-2121 study (N = 43) tested a range of study doses from 50 × 106 to 800 × 106 CAR+ T cells. Among the 22 evaluable patients in the cohort receiving > 150 × 106 CAR+ T cells, the ORR was 95.5% [21]. The final doses under evaluation for the phase 2 study of bb-2121 are 150 to 450 × 106 CAR+ T cells, which are higher than the doses used in this study with LCAR-B38M (median total CAR+ T cells = 32.3 × 106). The dual epitope-binding of LCAR-B38M, which confers high avidity binding, may result in clinical responses at lower cell doses, with less toxicity.
Conclusions
This ongoing first-in-human study has provided initial proof-of-concept that dual epitope-binding LCAR-B38M CAR T cells may be a highly effective therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. LCAR-B38M displayed a manageable safety profile consistent with its known mechanism of action. Further clinical evaluation of this promising and potentially transformational treatment approach is underway, with an ongoing phase 1b/2 study in the US (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03548207).
Additional files
Study Schema. Figure showing the study schema. (DOCX 66 kb)
LCAR-B38M lentiviral construct. Figure depicting the LCAR-B38M lentiviral construct. (DOCX 17 kb)
Relationship between BCMA expression and clinical response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival by BCMA expression. (DOCX 15 kb)
Relationship between dose and response. Relationship between CAR+ cell dose and complete response. (DOCX 80 kb)
Genomic copies of LCAR-B38M. Copies of LCAR-B38M per microgram of genomic DNA. (DOCX 90 kb)
Interleukin-6 levels by cytokine release syndrome grade. Peak IL-6 levels by CRS grade. (DOCX 47 kb)
Immunoglobulin levels following LCAR-B38M infusion. Levels of serum IgA, IgG, lambda chain, and kappa chain following CAR T cell infusion. (DOCX 281 kb)
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to colleagues from the Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. We thank Zhu Chen (State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Shanghai Institute of Hematology, Rui Jin Hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine), Hong Yan (Medical College of Xi’an Jiaotong University), Fang-Liang Zhang (from GenScript), and Shou-Ping Gong (The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University) for the great support and propagation of this clinical trial; Xiao-Rong Ma and Jin Wang for the clinical support; Xin Meng and Wei Tian for the technical support of experiments; and Tracy T. Cao (Janssen Global Services, LLC.) for writing assistance. We especially thank all the patients who participated in the study, without whom this study would never have been accomplished.
Wang-Gang Zhang and Ai-Li He are the principal investigators of the study.
Funding
The study was sponsored by the Nanjing Legend Biotech Co., Grant Major Research Projects Funding Schemes of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University (YJZDJH201601) awarded to A-LH, Key Research and Development Plan of ShaanXi Province, Major Project (2018ZDXM-SF-039) awarded to A-LH, and Key Research and Development Plan of ShaanXi Province, General Project (2018SF-002) awarded to W-HZ. Nanjing Legend Biotech Co. was involved in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and in writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
Legend Biotech USA Inc. will share the study protocol and individual, deidentified participant data that underlie the results reported in this article. The data will be available beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication. The data will be shared with investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by Legend Biotech USA Inc. The data may be used for individual participant data meta-analysis. Proposals may be submitted up to 36 months following article publication and should be directed to datasharingproposals@legendbiotech.com.
Abbreviations
- AE
Adverse event
- ALT
Alanine aminotransferase
- aPTT
Activated partial thromboplastin time
- AST
Aspartate aminotransferase
- BCMA
B cell maturation antigen
- CAR
Chimeric antigen receptor
- CI
Confidence interval
- CR
Complete response
- CRS
Cytokine release syndrome
- ECOG
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- IgA
Immunoglobulin A
- IgG
Immunoglobulin G
- IMWG
International Myeloma Working Group
- ISS
International Staging System
- MM
Multiple myeloma
- MRD
Minimal residual disease
- ORR
Overall response rate
- PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
- PR
Partial response
- R/R
Relapsed/refractory
- SD
Standard deviation
- VGPR
Very good partial response
Authors’ contributions
W-GZ and A-LH were the principal investigators of the study. W-GZ, A-LH, and X-HF coordinated and oversaw the study. W-HZ, JL, and B-YW performed the material collection and coordinated the data analysis; W-HZ, JL, B-YW, Y-XC, X-MC, YY, Y-LZ, F-XW, P-YZ, BL, L-FG, J-LW, JB, and YX participated in sample collection and/or treatment of patients; X-GW, Z-FL, and Z-ZL helped in technical support and flow cytometry analyses; NY, RZ, HZ, and YS participated in data analyses; R-LZ and L-LW helped in patients’ lymphocyte apheresis; YG participated in biochemical and immunological detection; QH and Q-CZ participated in cell sample processing; W-GZ, A-LH, X-HF, W-HZ, JL, and B-YW were the major contributors in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional independent ethics committee (reference number: 2016002) of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. All patients provided written informed consent.
Consent for publication
Consent from patients whose data are included in this article has been obtained in writing.
Competing interests
Q-CZ and X-HF are employees of Nanjing Legend Biotech Co. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Wan-Hong Zhao, Email: 13991365406@163.com.
Jie Liu, Email: lieujie@163.com.
Bai-Yan Wang, Email: wangbaiyan@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.
Yin-Xia Chen, Email: chenyx204@163.com.
Xing-Mei Cao, Email: 13892862529@163.com.
Yun Yang, Email: yangyun108@163.com.
Yi-Lin Zhang, Email: zhangyilin@stu.xjtu.edu.cn.
Fang-Xia Wang, Email: wfx197478@163.com.
Peng-Yu Zhang, Email: zhangpengyu2004@126.com.
Bo Lei, Email: 29801608@qq.com.
Liu-Fang Gu, Email: 61176828@qq.com.
Jian-Li Wang, Email: wangjianli73@sina.cn.
Nan Yang, Email: shmily1989-2008@163.com.
Ru Zhang, Email: 1959483440@qq.com.
Hui Zhang, Email: youfeng1100@126.com.
Ying Shen, Email: zheyuanqi0128@163.com.
Ju Bai, Email: 13720549654@stu.xjtu.edu.cn.
Yan Xu, Email: xuyandr@163.com.
Xu-Geng Wang, Email: wxugeng@163.com.
Rui-Li Zhang, Email: 384283419@qq.com.
Li-Li Wei, Email: 125186643@qq.com.
Zong-Fang Li, Email: lzf2568@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.
Zhen-Zhen Li, Email: lizhen2015@xjtu.edu.cn.
Yan Geng, Email: wsw87679358@163.com.
Qian He, Email: qianh0511@163.com.
Qiu-Chuan Zhuang, Email: quentin.zhuang@legendbiotech.com.
Xiao-Hu Fan, Email: frank.fan@legendbiotech.com.
Ai-Li He, Email: heaili@xjtu.edu.cn.
Wang-Gang Zhang, Email: zhangwanggang2003@yahoo.com.
References
- 1.Palumbo A, Anderson K. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):1046–1060. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1011442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harousseau JL, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005-01 phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(30):4621–4629. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.9158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kumar SK, Lee JH, Lahuerta JJ, et al. Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: a multicenter international myeloma working group study. Leukemia. 2012;26(1):149–157. doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lokhorst HM, Plesner T, Laubach JP, et al. Targeting CD38 with daratumumab monotherapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1207–1219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lonial S, Dimopoulos M, Palumbo A, et al. Elotuzumab therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(7):621–631. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lonial S, Weiss BM, Usmani SZ, et al. Daratumumab monotherapy in patients with treatment-refractory multiple myeloma (SIRIUS): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1551–1560. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01120-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Palumbo A, Dimopoulos M, San Miguel J, et al. Lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Rev. 2009;23(2):87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2008.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rajkumar SV, Rosinol L, Hussein M, et al. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(13):2171–2177. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.1853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Richardson PG, Weller E, Lonial S, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010;116(5):679–686. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-268862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(9):906–917. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Carpenter RO, Evbuomwan MO, Pittaluga S, et al. B-cell maturation antigen is a promising target for adoptive T-cell therapy of multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(8):2048–2060. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Novak AJ, Darce JR, Arendt BK, et al. Expression of BCMA, TACI, and BAFF-R in multiple myeloma: a mechanism for growth and survival. Blood. 2004;103(2):689–694. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-06-2043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sanchez E, Li M, Kitto A, et al. Serum B-cell maturation antigen is elevated in multiple myeloma and correlates with disease status and survival. Br J Haematol. 2012;158(6):727–738. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09241.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Seckinger A, Delgado JA, Moser S, et al. Target expression, generation, preclinical activity, and pharmacokinetics of the BCMA-T cell bispecific antibody EM801 for multiple myeloma treatment. Cancer Cell. 2017;31(3):396–410. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.KYMRIAH (tisagenlecleucel) prescribing information. East Hanover: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 2018. https://www.pharma.us.novartis.com/sites/www.pharma.us.novartis.com/files/kymriah.pdf (Accessed 4 Nov 2018).
- 16.Maude SL, Frey N, Shaw PA, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(16):1507–1517. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Maude SL, Laetsch TW, Buechner J, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):439–448. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(26):2531–2544. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.YESCARTA (axicabtagene ciloleucel) prescribing information. Santa Monica, CA: Kite Pharma Inc, 2017. https://www.yescarta.com/files/yescarta-pi.pdf (Accessed 4 Nov 2018).
- 20.Brudno JN, Maric I, Hartman SD, et al. T cells genetically modified to express an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor cause remissions of poor-prognosis relapsed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(22):2267–2280. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Raje N, Berdeja J, Lin Y, et al. bb2121 anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: updated results from a multicenter phase I study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:8007. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.8007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fan F, Zhao W, Liu J, et al. Durable remissions with BCMA-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells in patients with refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(18):LBA3001–LBA3LBA. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.LBA3001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International myeloma working group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538–e548. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines) for multiple myeloma version 2.2016. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2016. https://www.nccn.org (Accessed 10 Apr 2016).
- 25.Lee DW, Gardner R, Porter DL, et al. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood. 2014;124(2):188–195. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-552729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2006;20(9):1467–1473. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rajkumar SV, Harousseau JL, Durie B, et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood. 2011;117(18):4691–4695. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-299487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nucci M, Anaissie E. Infections in patients with multiple myeloma in the era of high-dose therapy and novel agents. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(8):1211–1225. doi: 10.1086/605664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kim K, Lee JH, Kim JS, et al. Clinical profiles of multiple myeloma in Asia-an Asian myeloma network study. Am J Hematol. 2014;89(7):751–756. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lu J, Lu J, Chen W, et al. Clinical features and treatment outcome in newly diagnosed Chinese patients with multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter analysis. Blood Cancer J. 2014;4:e239. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2014.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ali SA, Shi V, Maric I, et al. T cells expressing an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor cause remissions of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;128(13):1688–1700. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-04-711903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Study Schema. Figure showing the study schema. (DOCX 66 kb)
LCAR-B38M lentiviral construct. Figure depicting the LCAR-B38M lentiviral construct. (DOCX 17 kb)
Relationship between BCMA expression and clinical response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival by BCMA expression. (DOCX 15 kb)
Relationship between dose and response. Relationship between CAR+ cell dose and complete response. (DOCX 80 kb)
Genomic copies of LCAR-B38M. Copies of LCAR-B38M per microgram of genomic DNA. (DOCX 90 kb)
Interleukin-6 levels by cytokine release syndrome grade. Peak IL-6 levels by CRS grade. (DOCX 47 kb)
Immunoglobulin levels following LCAR-B38M infusion. Levels of serum IgA, IgG, lambda chain, and kappa chain following CAR T cell infusion. (DOCX 281 kb)
Data Availability Statement
Legend Biotech USA Inc. will share the study protocol and individual, deidentified participant data that underlie the results reported in this article. The data will be available beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication. The data will be shared with investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by Legend Biotech USA Inc. The data may be used for individual participant data meta-analysis. Proposals may be submitted up to 36 months following article publication and should be directed to datasharingproposals@legendbiotech.com.