Skip to main content
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal logoLink to Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
. 2018 Oct 13;18(6):217–230. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2018.10.001

Left posterior fascicular block, state-of-the-art review: A 2018 update

Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera a,, Raimundo Barbosa-Barros b, Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo a, Luiz Carlos de Abreu a, Joseane Elza Tonussi Mendes a, Kjell Nikus c
PMCID: PMC6302819  PMID: 30326266

Abstract

We conducted a review of the literature regarding epidemiology, clinical, electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic aspects, classification, and differential diagnosis of left posterior fascicular block.

Isolated left posterior fascicular block (LPFB) is an extremely rare finding both in the general population and in specific patient groups. In isolated LPFB 20% of the vectorcardiographic (VCG) QRS loop is located in the right inferior quadrant and when associated with right bundle branch block (RBBB) ≥40%.

The diagnosis of LPFB should always consider the clinical aspects, because a definite diagnosis cannot be made in the presence of right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/emphysema), extensive lateral myocardial infarction (MI) or extremely vertical heart.

Intermittent LPFBs are never complete blocks (transient or second degree LPFB) and even in the permanent ones, one cannot be sure that they are complete. When LPFB is associated with RBBB and acute inferior MI, PR interval prolongation is very frequent.

Keywords: Left posterior fascicular block, Bifascicular block, Intraventricular conduction disturbances

1. Introduction

Left posterior fascicular block (LPFB) is an intraventricular conduction disturbance of the left posterior fascicle (LPF) of the left bundle branch (LBB), which travels to the inferior and posterior region of the left ventricle (LV), the left ventricle inflow tract (LVIT). In LPFB, there is a total or partial (transient or second degree LPFB) conduction defect of the supraventricular electrical impulse. Consequently, the stimulus is conducted to the LV via the left septal fascicle (LSF), which first activate the midseptal and apical region of the LV [1] and to the left anterior fascicle (LAF), which is directed to the base of the anterolateral papillary muscle of the mitral valve (ALPM), inserting into the upper lateral wall of the LV along its endocardial surface [2].

Typical electrocardiographic (ECG) and vectorcardiographic (VCG) changes induced by the three fascicular blocks are illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

LAFB (Fig. 1-A) causes left axis deviation in the frontal plane (usually between −45° and −90°); LPFB (Fig. 1-B) causes right axis deviation in the frontal plane (QRS axis ≈+120°, between +80 and +140°); while left septal fascicular block (Fig. 1-C) causes prominent anterior QRS forces in the horizontal plane.

The LPF is the least vulnerable division of the intraventricular conduction system. Rosenbaum et al. referred that the causes of greater vulnerability of the LAF compared to LPF are: anatomical (the LAF is smaller in diameter - 3 mm versus 6 mm - and shorter - 35 mm vs 30 mm); electrophysiological (as a consequence of its greater extension and smaller diameter, the depolarization and repolarization of the LAF is slower than of the LPF); vascular: LPF is irrigated by two coronary systems, from the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and the right coronary artery (RCA), and localization (topography): the LPF runs through a more protected area, the LVIT with less mechanical pressure impact. On the other hand, the LAF runs diagonally through the subendocardium of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). This region is subject to a great turbulence and high pressure, which partially explains its greater vulnerability [[3], [4], [5], [6]].

2. Epidemiology

Isolated LPFB is very rare finding (0.1% of all intraventricular conduction defects). Little data exists regarding the prevalence of LPFB. Haataja et al., in Finland, based on the Health 2000 Survey conducted in 2000/2001 studied 6354 individuals aged 30+. In this large population only 8 patients had LPFB. In this study LPFB was defined as frontal QRS axis ≥120°, lead I rS configuration, leads II, III and aVF qR configuration, and no pathological Q waves in leads II, III, and aVF following Castellanos et al. [7,8]. We consider Castellano's criteria restrictive and not suitable, because the q waves in the inferior leads can be ≥ 40 ms in duration when associated with inferior myocardial infarction (MI).

The prevalence of LPFB in a large French population of 69,186 aircrew members examined for fitness assessment in an aeromedical center was 0.13% [9], compared with 1.25% for incomplete right bundle branch block (RBBB), 1.1% for LAFB, 0.46% for RBBB, 0.08% for left bundle branch block (LBBB), 0.03% for incomplete LBBB, while the prevalence of left septal fascicular block (LSFB) was not reported.

2.1. Possible causes

LPFB is the rarest of all intraventricular blocks, and extremely unusual when isolated. In the following, the association of the conduction block with clinical entities is described as reported in the publications from our literature review.

1) Coronary artery disease (CAD): Rizzon et al. [10] reported 15 cases with LPFB during acute MI. They observed that this ECG pattern was generally dependent on coexisting injury of the LSF and LPF. The anatomical reports did not confirm Rosenbaum's contention that LPFB was likely to be associated with more injury or extensive pathological abnormalities than LAFB [4,5]. The lesion associated with LPFB appeared to be less extensive and more discrete than those of LAFB. The LPF lesions were more proximal, any extension therefore being likely to involve the common LBB. It is worthy of note that chronic LPFB was frequently associated with calcifications of the mitral valve annulus and fibrotic lesions of the upper part of the atrioventricular junction.

Although rare, LPFB is a clinically important intraventricular conduction disturbance. Its appearance is reliably connected with inferior wall MI and generally reflects severe two- or three-vessel disease, requiring invasive investigation [[11], [12], [13]].

During the acute phase of ischemia in MI, LPFB is observed in ≈0.2–0.4% [14,15]. Association of LPFB and basal lateral (previously named dorsal) inferior MI accounted for Q waves (Q ≥ 40 ms) in the inferior leads II, III and aVF. However, the R-wave amplitude in these leads is increased in case of LPFB but decreased with inferolateral MI. Additionally, the QRS axis in the frontal plane (FP) shifts toward a vertical position in the presence of concomitant LPFB, but is little changed or slightly shifted away from the vertical in inferolateral MI. When inferolateral is accompanied by LPFB, there may be masking, imitation or enhancement of the effects of one lesion by the presence of the other [16]. A case of transient LPFB and various intraventricular conduction disturbances associated with acute anterolateral MI was reported by Ogawa et al. [17] Madias and Knez described transient LPFB during the treadmill stress test [18] (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Example of LPFB + complete RBBB Kennedy type III + hyperacute phase of inferior MI by obstruction of RCA.

FP: QRS axis +150°, VCG QRS loop with clockwise rotation and located in inferior quadrants (>40% area in inferior right quadrant), injury vector pointed to III suggesting proximal obstruction of RCA, ST segment depression in I and aVL, ST segment elevation (STE) in inferior leads (STEIII > STEII). HP: QRS loop located in the anterior quadrants, CW rotation, right end conduction delay (RECD) in the right anterior quadrant, complete RBBB Kennedy type III. LSP: all QRS loop located in anterior and inferior quadrants, QRS loop with counterclockwise rotation. Conclusion: LPFB + complete RBBB + acute inferior MI.

LPFB is rather frequent in inferior MI (5.5%). In the retrospective study from Godat et al., of a cohort of 830 patients referred for invasive investigation of suspected CAD, 163 patients had an old inferior MI. Nine patients (5.5%) showed a LPFB pattern; eight of these had three-vessel disease. The diagnosis of inferior MI had been made only in one case before entry of the patient into the hospital, since LPFB generally masks inferior MI [12] (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

QRS axis +115°, I and aVL rS; III qR; II, III and aVF qR with inferoapical post-ischemic T wave; V2—V3 deep S waves. LPFB and inferior MI accounted for Q waves in leads II, III and aVF (arrows). However, the R-wave amplitude in these leads is increased after LPFB but decreased after inferior MI. The mean QRS axis in the FP was shifted toward the vertical in LPFB but little changed or slightly shifted away from the vertical in inferior MI.

Isolated LPFB is a very rare finding but the evidence of transient right axis deviation with a LPFB pattern was reported during acute anterior MI as related with significant RCA obstruction and collateral circulation between the left coronary system and the posterior descending artery. Patanè et al. presented a case of transient right axis deviation, transient LPFB pattern and transient junctional rhythm with acute MI and a significant LAD stenosis [15] (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

A: Upwards concave STE followed by positive T waves across the precordial leads (hyperacute phase of anterolateral MI).

B: Right axis deviation, LPFB and a QS pattern from V2 to V6 suggesting transmural MI, higher precordial STE and qR pattern followed of negative T wave suggesting RBBB associated.

LPFB associated with Prinzmetal angina: Ortega-Carnicer et al. presented a case of a 49-year-old man with transient LPFB during Prinzmetal's angina with STE in the inferior leads; subsequently LPFB reappeared associated with acute inferior MI. These authors believe that the very early changes in the QRS axis and ST segment are explained by three important changes in leads overlying the affected area: 1) the conspicuous STE associated with reciprocal changes; 2) the “injury”-related intramural (local) block; and 3) the increase of the R-wave voltage, also dependent of dromotropic disturbance caused by the “injury” [19]. Note: This prominent R wave could explain the LSFB observed in the proximal obstruction of the LAD before its first septal perforator branch.

2) Familial progressive cardiac conduction defect or Lenègre disease [20]: Familial progressive cardiac conduction defect (PCCD) is a conduction disorder, that may progress to complete heart block. Affected individuals may be asymptomatic, or the condition may cause shortness of breath, dizziness, fainting, abdominal pain, heart failure, or sudden death. Mutations in several genes, including the SCN5A, SCN1B and TRPM4 genes, can cause PCCD. Mutations in the SCN5A gene are potential etiologic factors for a number of overlapping syndromes [21]. Several other genes may be the cause when PCCD occurs with congenital heart disease. Familial PCCD is usually inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. However, not all individuals with the mutated gene will manifest PCCD; in those that do, symptoms and severity vary (reduced penetrance and variable expressivity). Autosomal recessive inheritance and sporadic cases have been reported as rare entities. Treatment includes permanent pacemaker implantation.

3) Lev's disease or progressive idiopathic sclerosis of the “cardiac skeleton”: With a clinical behavior similar to Lenègre's disease, although typical for elderly patients. Both Lenègre's disease (known as progressive “primary” fibrosis of the His-Purkinje system) and the secondary mechanic injury, left-sided sclerosis of the “cardiac skeleton” or Lev's disease [22,23], cause intraventricular dromotropic disorders with QRS broadening into values ≥ 120 ms. Occasionally, they progress to more advanced (trifascicular) blocks, which may be expressed in the ECG as PR-interval prolongation with potential to cause sudden cardiac death by total trifascicular AV block.

Lenègre's and Lev's diseases are major indications for pacemaker implantation with an implantation rate of 0.15 per 1000 inhabitants per year. In Latin America the main cause is Chagas disease. The two entities, called PCCD, are inappropriately grouped as a single disease (Lev-Lenègre disease). However, Lenègre's disease is genetic and Lev's disease is degenerative. The last one is observed in elderly and is characterized by progressive mechanic fibrosis of the left cardiac “skeleton”, mitral ring, central fibrous body, membranous part of the base of the aorta and apical calcification of the muscular septum. On the other hand, Lenègre's disease has a genetic background and occurs in younger people.

In Lev's disease, the fibrosis and calcification may involve the intraventricular His system, causing LBBB or RBBB associated with fascicular blocks [24].

Fig. 5 shows a typical ECG example of Lev's disease.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Clinical features: 85-year-old female. Autopsy diagnosis: Lev's disease.

ECG diagnosis: 1st degree AV block + LPFB + RBBB: probable trifascicular block + digitalis effect.

4) Chronic aortic regurgitation, aortic stenosis or both: Dromotropic disturbance is attributed to the mechanical effect of jet regurgitation on the posterior portion of the left septum, the site where the thick LPF traverses the LVIT. Among 304 cases of aortic valvulopathies studied for surgical selection, Marchandise et al. found a high incidence of conduction disturbances (16% in aortic stenosis and 18.4% in aortic regurgitation). The incidence of conduction disturbances increases with age, valvular calcifications, left ventricular hypertrophy with strain pattern, heart failure, and CAD [25].

5) Chronic chagasic myocarditis: From a large population database of primary care patients (7590 cases), LPFB was observed in 55 individuals (0.72%) [26].

6)Acute myocarditis [27].

7)Infiltrative cardiomyopathies: cardiac amyloidosis [28], sarcoidosis [29], hemochromatosis cardiomyopathy, and Fabry disease.

8) Severe obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy treated with percutaneous alcohol ablation: in the procedure, reduction of the hypertrophic septum is done by absolute alcohol injection in the first septal perforator branch of the LAD. Fig. 6, Fig. 7 illustrate the ECG consequences of the procedure.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

ECG performed before the percutaneous septal ablation.

Clinical diagnosis: obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with a gradient in LVOT of 80 mmHg and NYHA IV, even with medication.

ECG diagnosis: left atrial enlargement + left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) with strain.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

ECG/VCG correlation immediately after percutaneous procedure.

ECG/VCG: LPFB + acute septal MI + LVH + RBBB.

9)Systemic hypertension [30].

10)Interventricular septal tumor [31].

11)Hyperkalemia: in this case disappeared promptly by hemodialysis, as the serum potassium level returned to normal [32].

12)Selective coronary arteriography in the RCA [33].

13)Acquired ventricular septal defect: in cases of inferior wall MI, complicated by rupture of the inferior septum, resulting in isolated LPFB [34].

14) Acute pulmonary embolism? [35] Although described as LPFB by Scott, the diagnosis of LPFB should always consider the clinical aspects. LPFB diagnosis is not possible in the presence of right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH).

15) Hereditary: Pseudo LPFB? [36] Hereditary right axis deviation with pseudo LPFB and incomplete RBBB resulting in right axis deviation was described in a family. Clinical, radiological and echocardiographic evaluation excluded structural and functional cardiac abnormalities as well as chest deformities and lung disease [36].

2.2. LPFB classification

I. Isolated or associated with other blocks.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

VCG/ECG correlation in isolated LPFB.

FP-ECG: initial 10–20 ms vector heading upward and to the left; rS pattern in I and aVL; qR in inferior leads; RIII > RII; middle final notch in the descending limb of the R wave of lead III; QRS loop of clockwise (CW) rotation and broadened morphology.

Clinical absence of RVH, vertical heart or extensive lateral MI (the diagnosis of LPFB must obligatorily be clinical-electrocardiographic). A definite diagnosis should be made only in absence of RVH, “vertical heart” or lateral MI.

FP-VCG: Initial 10–20 ms vector heading above and to the left (near −45°) with delay (initial 10–25 ms); broad QRS loop, CW rotation; maximal vector ≈ +110°; almost all the QRS loop located below the X orthogonal lead predominantly in the inferior quadrants; QRS loop duration 110 ms; T loop with CW rotation, heading below and to the left near +10°.

HP-ECG: rS pattern in V1 –V2, deep S wave in V2 (consequence of posterior dislocation and to the right of the final forces), scant progression of growth of R wave, transition zone in V4 and Rs in V6, prolonged R-wave peak time (≥50 ms) in V5—V6 and disappearance of q wave in these leads.

HP-VCG: Initial 10–20 ms vector heading to the front; QRS loop shape very similar to type C RVH; QRS loop of CCW rotation; greater area of QRS loop located in the left posterior quadrant; maximal vector of QRS around −80°; final portions with delay located in the right posterior quadrant (>20% of the QRS loop area located in the right posterior quadrant). T-loop minimally directed to the front and leftward (+10°) with CW rotation.

Right sagittal plane-VCG: Initial 10–20 ms vector heading to the front and above with delay; most of the QRS loop located in the inferoposterior quadrant; QRS loop of CW rotation; maximal vector around +160°; end QRS conduction delay; T loop heading to the front and below with CW rotation.

Conclusion: Isolated LPFB.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Typical RBBB pattern associated with LPFB, septal infarction (qR in V1) and anterior ischemia.

Demoulin et al. [41] reported 10 cases with histopathologic correlates of LPFB, two isolated cases and eight associated with RBBB. Among these eight cases, LPFB was intermittent in one and alternated with LAFB in two cases. Severe pathologic changes in the conduction system were found in all but one case, where LPFB resulted from a very recent MI. The lesions almost exclusively involved the LAF and LSF, where they actually predominated.

  • c)

    Associated with LSFB: only one case was described in the literature [42] (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Right axis deviation (QRS axis in +115°), rS pattern in leads I and aVL, tall R waves in lead III > RII, and qR pattern (embryonic q) in lead III. This ECG pattern in the limb leads, in the absence of clinical and echocardiographic evidence of RVH, lateral infarction and/or vertical heart associated with significant left ventricular hypertrophy, suggests LPFB. In the chest leads, prominent anterior QRS forces: R wave in V2 > 15 mm. In the absence of RVH, laterobasal MI, RBBB, pre-excitation with a posterior anomalous pathway, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, endomyocardial fibrosis, muscular dystrophy, and dextroposition, strongly suggests LSFB.

II. According to steadiness:

  • a)

    Permanent: it is the most frequent and always complete (QRS duration ≥120 ms).

  • b)
    Intermittent or of second degree LPFB that could be:
    • Rate-dependent LPFB: tachycardia-dependent or in “phase 3“, and bradycardia-dependent or in “phase 4“.
    • Rate-independent LPFB. Mechanism: Mobitz type I; Mobitz type II by Wenckebach phenomenon; and by significant hypopolarization (Fig. 11, Fig. 12, Fig. 13).

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Admission ECG.

Sinus tachycardia, rate-independent transient alternating LPFB associated with complete RBBB (qR pattern from V1—V4) + acute extensive anterior STEMI, caused by occlusion of the LAD after the first septal perforator and before the first diagonal branch of the LAD, because the injury vector points to the left leads (I and aVL) with reciprocal ST depression in the inferior leads. In precordial leads, the injury vector points to the front and minimally leftward, causing STE from V2—V5 (Fig. 12).

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

ECG/VCG correlation in the FP and HP.

FP: ST injury vector directed to left and upward (ST segment elevation in I and aVL and ST depression in III, aVF and II).

HP: St injury vector directed to front and leftward near +60°. ST segment elevation from V2 to V5, qR from V1—V4 (anterior MI complicated with RBBB).

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Long II lead. Beats 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, 14, and 16 have a RBBB pattern; beats 2, 3, 4, 8, 11, 13, 15 and 17 have a minimal degree of LPFB + RBBB; beat 9 has a major degree of LPFB without RBBB.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in the LAD showed total occlusion in the middle portion of the LAD. ECG performed immediately after stent implantation (Fig. 14).

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14

ECG after percutaneous coronary intervention, RBBB disappears, anterior transmural MI, ST segment elevation from V1 to V4, negative T wave in left precordial leads.

Complicated evolution of the procedure, because there was no myocardial reperfusion (epicardial reperfusion without microcircular reperfusion). This phenomenon suggests microcirculation injury, no washout of metabolites, and therefore the pH is very low (tissue acidosis). The hydrogen, calcium, potassium, and detritus are accumulated in this area. In addition, transient LPFB and RBBB disappear after stent implantation, QRS width decreases, Q waves in aVL, V1—V3, STE in the anteroseptal wall.

2.3. ECG criteria of LPFB in the FP

QRS deviation to the right (QRS axis ≈+120° between +80 and +140°); with SIQIII pattern, rS pattern in leads I and aVL; qR pattern in III, aVF and II: Q wave is always present in III and may be small or absent in II or aVF; characteristic notch in the descending limb of the R wave in III (middle-final notch); RIII > RII: QRS axis closer to +120° (III) than +60° (II); when closer to the latter, it would indicate an incomplete LPFB. q wave in III is always greater than q wave in II and aVF. If there is association with inferior MI, Q wave >40 ms [43]; QRS duration <120 ms if isolated (without RBBB); R-peak time in aVF ≤35 ms [44], and the PR interval is prolonged [45].

2.3.1. ECG criteria in the HP

V1 and V2: rS pattern or rarely QS; S wave of V2 -V3 very deep as a consequence of posterior dislocation and to the right of the terminal QRS forces; scant progression of R waves growth in the precordial leads. Normally the R wave amplitude increases from V1 to V5. Around V3, R waves become larger than S waves and this is called the 'transitional zone”. In LPFB, the transitional zone is dislocated to the left in V5 and V6: Rs pattern; prolonged R-wave peak time in V5—V6 (≥50 ms) and disappearance of q wave in these leads.

2.4. VCG criteria of LPFB

FP: Vector of initial 10–20 ms heading above and to the left (near −45°) with possible delay (initial 10–25 ms) [46]. If associated to inferior MI, superior initial forces of 25 ms or more (more than 12.5 dashes above the orthogonal X lead. 1 dash = 2 ms) [45]; broad QRS loop, with CW rotation. Cooksey, Dunn and Massie wrote that occasionally, it may be in “eight” with a CCW rotation in the terminal portion (10%) [47,48]; maximal vector near +110° (+80° to +140°) [49]; almost all the loop is located below the X line (0 to ±180°) in the inferior quadrants; 20% of the loop located in the right inferior quadrant. If there is association to complete RBBB, 40% or more [37,39,40]; afferent limb heading below and slightly to the left, and the efferent one to the right; middle-terminal portion of the QRS loop (vector of 60–100 ms) with delay. It may possibly reach the right superior quadrant; QRS loop duration up to 110 ms if isolated. In association with complete RBBB >120 ms; normal ST-T vectors in isolated LPFB: T loop with CW rotation, heading below and to the left. If in association with complete RBBB: alteration secondary to ventricular repolarization.

Table 1 and Fig. 15 show the differential diagnosis between isolated LPFB and LPFB associated with CRBBB.

Table 1.

ECG/VCG differential diagnosis between isolated LPFB and LPFB associated with CRBBB in the frontal plane.

Isolated LPFB LPFB + CRBBB
QRS duration 90–110 ms 120 ms
Location of the QRS loop 40% of the area located in the left inferior quadrant 40% of the area located in the right inferior quadrant
Vector of final 20 ms There might be delay, but discrete. With important delay to the right.
Number of comets in the QRS loop (if 1 comet = 2 ms) 45 to 50 ≥60

Fig. 15.

Fig. 15

ECG/VCG correlation in case of isolated LPFB (A) and LPFB associated with RBBB (B).

Horizontal Plane: QRS loop very similar to RVH of type C [50]; QRS loop of CCW rotation. The rotation could be in “eight”; initial 10–20 ms vector heading to the front and the right or left; greater area of QRS loop located in the left posterior quadrant; maximal vector of QRS around −60 to −110°; final portions with delay (60–100 ms) and located in the right posterior quadrant; 20% or more of the QRS loop area located in the right posterior quadrant; T loop located to the front and the left (+60°) and CW rotation.

2.5. LPFB differential diagnosis

Obligatorily, the diagnosis of LPFB must be clinical-ECG-VCG. A firm diagnosis is not possible in the presence of: a vertical heart in slender subjects (ectomorphic biotype); presence of any cause for RVH, especially chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema; large lateral wall MI: QS in I and aVL [51].

Right end conduction delay (RECD) by the inferior fascicle of the RBB or RECD type II of our classification [52]: characterized by presenting ECD located in the right inferior quadrant in the territory of the inferior fascicle of the right branch. It corresponds to the territory of the right inferior fascicle (Fig. 17). The differential diagnosis occurs with LPFB. Many of the cases described in literature as LPFB are, the way we see it, RECD type II, and since their ECG/VCG differences are very subtle, the diagnosis must always be clinical-ECG-VCG.

Fig. 17.

Fig. 17

Outline of the inferior divisional block in RVIT (RECD type II) [23,55,56].

RVIT: right ventricular inflow tract; RVOT: right ventricular outflow tract; RVFW: right ventricular free wall.

In the horizontal plane, it is hard to differentiate isolated LPFB from RVH VCG type [53] and right posterior subdivision block [54] (Fig. 16).

Fig. 16.

Fig. 16

A: Isolated LPFB in the HP; B: Type C RVH in the HP in a man with severe COPD; C: right posterior subdivision block in a healthy individual.

2.6. Differential diagnosis between right posterior subdivision block, segmental blocks of the right bundle-branch or RECD type II and LPFB

RECD are ECG/VCG changes, secondary to physiological delay or to true dromotropic disorders in the territory of one of the hypothetical three fascicles or actually, fiber contingents of the RBB on the free wall of the RV, in isolation in the right ventricular free wall. In case of block, there should be a dromotropic disorder or slowing of the ventricular activation process. These blocks cause localized or regional delay in the basal portion of the RV free wall. Zonal right ventricular blocks correspond to block of the superoanterior division of the right bundle on RV free wall (on RVOT) or inferoposterior zone (on RVIT) of the RV free wall. Fig. 18 shows hypothetical fascicles (or contingents) of the RBB in the RV free wall.

Fig. 19.

Fig. 19

ECG/VCG correlation: blockage of the inferior fascicle of the RBB.

RECD type II: RECD located in the right inferior quadrant in the territory of the inferior fascicle of the right bundle branch. SÂQRS: +95°. SI-RII-RIII pattern (RIII <15 mm). I and aVL: rS. II and III: qR. The descending ramp of R wave is slightly slow. It may present differential diagnosis with LPFB.

Fig. 18.

Fig. 18

ECG of a young male athlete with normal heart.

Clinical diagnosis: Healthy patient requesting examinations to assess his eligibility for competitive sport.

ECG diagnosis: SÂQRS: + 85°. RII > RIII. SAT: + 5° to the front and the left. Morphology of incomplete RBBB: rSR′ in V1.

Conclusion: ECG of RECD type II. Why? Because of the patterns on ECG/VCG correlation in the FP (Fig. 19).

Right distal peripheral blocks generally do not hide the electrical signs of a non-activatable myocardium [57]. These blocks enhance the manifestations of later occurring electromotive forces resulting from RV activation. Therefore, they do not interfere with the development of ventricular electromotive forces in the zones affected by myocardial injury. This happens both in the presence of a right anterior subdivision block, which increases the duration of basal electromotive forces by at least 10 ms, that normally develop in 64–72 ms [58] and in the presence of a right posterior subdivision block. This latter block prolongs the electromotive forces originating in the posterior and medial and inferior posterolateral septal regions of the right ventricular free wall by an average of 12 ms, which become activated in 30–45 ms [59].

Table 2 shows the differential diagnosis between right posterior subdivision block and LPFB.

Table 2.

Differential diagnosis between right posterior subdivision block (RECD type II) and LPFB.

RECD type II or right posterior subdivision block LPFB
PR interval Normal Frequent prolongation
Association with inferior infarction No Frequent
Voltage of RII and RIII ≤10 mm ≥15 mm
RII/RIII voltage ratio RII > RIII RIII > RII
R-wave peak time in aVF, V5— V6 Normal Increased: up to 30 ms
R-wave peak time in aVL Normal Decreased: up to 15 ms
Aspect of QRS loop in the FP CW and with characteristic rapid passage from left to right between 30 and 50 ms CW, aspect of “fat” loop and maximal vector near +120°
Clinical factors that should be excluded Not stated Vertical heart, RVH, emphysema, COPD and lateral infarction

RECD: right end conduction delay; LPFB: left posterior fascicular block; CWR: clockwise; FP: frontal plane; RVH: right ventricular hypertrophy; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

2.7. Clinical significance of RECD

In 90% of cases they represent normal variants. The clinical significance and interest lie in the fact that:

  • 1)

    They may be confused with LAFB and LPFB [52];

  • 2)

    They may be confused with electrically inactive areas in the anterior and the inferior walls [60];

  • 3)

    They may represent the ECG/VCG pattern of the Brugada syndrome [61].

Fig. 18 shows a typical example of the inferior fascicle of the RBB or RECD type II of our classification. This dromotropic disturbance has differential diagnosis with LPFB.

3. Conclusion

Isolated LPFB is an extremely rare finding both in the general population and in specific patient groups and the QRS loop in the HP is indistinguishable from the QRS loop of the RVH type C characteristic of COPD. In isolated LPFB 20% of the QRS loop is located in the right inferior quadrant and when associated with RBBB ≥40%.

In our experience, isolated LPFB is much more unusual than LSFB. The diagnosis of LPFB should always consider the clinical aspects, because a definite diagnosis cannot be made in the presence of RVH (COPD/emphysema), extensive lateral MI or extremely vertical heart.

Intermittent LPFBs are never complete blocks and even in the permanent ones, one cannot be sure that they are complete. When LPFB is associated with RBBB and acute inferior MI, PR interval prolongation is almost constant.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Indian Heart Rhythm Society.

References

  • 1.Kastor J.A., Goldreyer B.N., Moore E.N. Intraventricular conduction in man studied with an endocardial electrode catheter mapping technique. Patients with normal QRS and right bundle branch block. Circulation. 1975;51:786–796. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.51.5.786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Durrer D., van Dam R.T., Freud G.E. Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation. 1970;41:899–912. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.41.6.899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Macfarlane P.W., van Oosterom A., Janse M. Springer; 2012. Electrocardiology: comprehensive clinical ECG. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rosenbaum M.B., Elizari M.V., Lazzari J.O. Editorial Paidós; Buenos Aires: 1968. Los hemibloqueos. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rosenbaum M.B., Elizari M.V., Lazzari J.O. Oldmar, FL Tampa Tracings; USA: 1970. The hemiblocks. New concepts of intraventricular conduction based on human anatomical, physiological and clinical studies. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Surawicz B., Knilans T.K. sixth ed. ed. Saunders Elsevier; USA: 2008. Chou's electrocardiography in clinical practice. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Castellanos A., Jr., Lemberg L. Diagnosis of isolated and combined block in the bundle branches and the divisions of the left branch. Circulation. 1971;43:971–976. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.43.6.971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Haataja P., Nikus K., Kahonen M. Prevalence of ventricular conduction blocks in the resting electrocardiogram in a general population: the Health 2000 Survey. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:1953–1960. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Monin J., Bisconte S., Nicaise A. Prevalence of intraventricular conduction disturbances in a large French population. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016;21:479–485. doi: 10.1111/anec.12331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rizzon P., Rossi L., Baissus C. Left posterior hemiblock in acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1975;37:711–720. doi: 10.1136/hrt.37.7.711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Castellanos A., Jr. Diagnosis of left anterior hemiblock and left posterior hemiblock in the presence of inferior wall myocardial infarction. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1971;47:923–930. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Godat F.J., Gertsch M. Isolated left posterior fascicular block: a reliable marker for inferior myocardial infarction and associated severe coronary artery disease. Clin Cardiol. 1993;16:220–226. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960160311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Janion M., Ciuraszkiewicz K., Sielski J. Myocardial asynchrony in patients with postinfraction intraventricular conduction defects. Echocardiography. 2007;24:1029–1034. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00532.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Demoulin J.C., Kulbertus H.E. Histopathologic correlates of left posterior fascicular block. Am J Cardiol. 1979;44:1083–1088. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(79)90173-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Patane S., Marte F., Mancuso A. Transient right axis deviation with left posterior hemiblock and junctional rhythm during acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2009;135:e69–e72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Watt T.B., Jr., Flowers N.C., Conrad J.D. Posterior fascicular block versus posteroinferior myocardial infarction in left posterior excitation disturbances. Am J Cardiol. 1982;49:707–715. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)91950-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ogawa S., Kimura M., Okada M. A case of acute anterolateral infarction complicated with "left posterior hemiblock". Jpn Heart J. 1976;17:123–132. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Madias J.E., Knez P. Transient left posterior hemiblock during myocardial ischemia-eliciting exercise treadmill testing: a report of a case and a critical analysis of the literature. J Electrocardiol. 1999;32:57–64. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(99)90022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ortega-Carnicer J., Garcia-Nieto F., Malillos M. Transient left posterior hemiblock during Prinzmetal's angina culminating in acute myocardial infarction. Chest. 1983;84:638–640. doi: 10.1378/chest.84.5.638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lenegre J. Etiology and pathology of bilateral bundle branch block in relation to complete heart block. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1964;6:409–444. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(64)80001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pérez-Riera A.R., Daminello Raimundo R., Figueiredo J.L. Cardiac sodium channel, its mutations and their spectrum of arrhythmia phenotypes. J Hum Growth Dev. 2016;26:291–296. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lev M. Anatomic basis for atrioventricular block. Am J Med. 1964;37:742–748. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(64)90022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lev M. The normal anatomy of the conduction system in man and its pathology in atrioventricular block. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964;111:817–829. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb53149.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sugiura M., Okada R., Hiraoka K. Histological studies on the conduction system in 14 cases of right bundle branch block associated with left axis deviation. Jpn Heart J. 1969;10:121–132. doi: 10.1536/ihj.10.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Marchandise B., Piette F., Chalant C.H. Conduction disorders in aortic valve diseases. Acta Cardiol. 1975;30:111–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Marcolino M.S., Palhares D.M., Ferreira L.R. Electrocardiogram and Chagas disease: a large population database of primary care patients. Glob Heart. 2015;10:167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Forfang K., Lippestad C.T. Transient left posterior hemiblock in acute myocarditis. J Electrocardiol. 1974;7:83–85. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(74)80014-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.de Freitas A.F. The heart in Portuguese amyloidosis. Postgrad Med. 1986;62:601–605. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.62.728.601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tricot R., Valere P.E., Guerot C. Combination of right bundle-branch block and left posterior intraventricular hemiblock (apropos of 6 cases) Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1971;64:169–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Glancy D.L., Heck H.A., Jain N. ECG of the month. Preoperative ECG in a woman with systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, Smoking, and severe coronary and peripheral arterial disease. Left atrial enlargement. Right bundle branch block with marked right axis deviation (+130 degrees) due to left posterior fascicular block. J La State Med Soc. 2010;162:126–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cola H., Hoffman R., Borrega N.G. Left posterior hemiblock related to an interventricular septum tumour. First case in the literature. Eur Heart J. 1992;13:574–575. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.O'Neil J.P., Chung E.K. Unusual electrocardiographic finding--bifascicular block due to hyperkalemia. Am J Med. 1976;61:537–540. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(76)90334-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fernandez F., Heller J., Trevi G.P. The QRS loop in left anterior and posterior hemiblocks. Vectorcardiographic study during selective coronary arteriography. Am J Cardiol. 1972;29:337–343. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(72)90528-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rokey R., Chahine R.A. Isolated left posterior fascicular block associated with acquired ventricular septal defect. Clin Cardiol. 1984;7:364–369. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960070608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Scott R.C. The S1Q3 (McGinn-White) pattern in acute cor pulmonale: a form of transient left posterior hemiblock? Am Heart J. 1971;82:135–137. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(71)90174-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lorber A., Maisuls E., Naschitz J. Hereditary right axis deviation: electrocardiographic pattern of pseudo left posterior hemiblock and incomplete right bundle branch block. Int J Cardiol. 1988;20:399–402. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(88)90295-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Medrano G.A., Brenes C., De Micheli A. Clinical electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic diagnosis of left posterior subdivision block, isolated or associated with RBBB. Am Heart J. 1972;84:727–737. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(72)90064-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Okuma K. ECG and VCG changes in experimental hemiblock and bifascicular block. Am Heart J. 1976;92:473–480. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(76)80047-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Palmieri M., Ruggeri G., Zappala A. Study of left posterior hemiblock associated with right branch block. Clinical, electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic study. G Ital Cardiol. 1974;4:463–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Varriale P., Kennedy R.J. Right bundle branch block and left posterior fascicular block. Vectorcardiographic and clinical features. Am J Cardiol. 1972;29:459–465. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(72)90433-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Demoulin J.C., Kulbertus H.E. Pathologic basis of left posterior hemiblock. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37:131. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Perez-Riera A.R., Baranchuk A. Unusual conduction disorder: left posterior fascicular block + left septal fascicular block. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2015;20:187–188. doi: 10.1111/anec.12185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Medrano G.A., Brenes C.P., Sodi-Pallares D. Necrosis of the posterior aspect of the free left ventricular wall associated with block of the posterior subdivision of the left bundle branch of His. Experimental electro- and vectorcardiographic study. J Electrocardiol. 1971;4:44–49. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(71)80049-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rusconi L., Nava A., Sermasi S. The left posterior fascicular block: is the diagnosis possible only by ECG? (author's transl) G Ital Cardiol. 1980;10:1129–1134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Castellanos A., Jr., Chapunoff E., Castillo C.A. The vectorcardiogram in left posterior hemiblock associated with inferior wall myocardial infarction. Chest. 1972;61:221–227. doi: 10.1378/chest.61.3.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Benchimol A., Desser K.B. The Frank vectorcardiogram in left posterior hemiblock. J Electrocardiol. 1971;4:129–136. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(71)80005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brenes C., Medrano G.A., Sodi-Pallares D. Block of the posterior subdivision of the left branch of the bundle of His. Clinical, electro- and vectorcardiographic study. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1970;40:621–634. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cooksey J.D., Dunn M., Massie E. Yearbook Medical Publishers; Chicago London: 1977. Clinical vectorcardiography and electrocardiography. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Brohet C.R., Arnaud P. Spatial Frank vectorcardiogram in left posterior fascicular block. Criteria and correlation with clinical and electrocardiographic data. Br Heart J. 1977;39:126–138. doi: 10.1136/hrt.39.2.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lopes V.M., Miguel J.M., dos Reis D.D. Left-posterior hemiblock. Clinical and vectorcardiographic study of twenty cases. J Electrocardiol. 1974;7:197–214. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(74)80031-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Elizari M.V., Acunzo R.S., Ferreiro M. Hemiblocks revisited. Circulation. 2007;115:1154–1163. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.637389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pérez-Riera A.R., Ferreira C., Schapachnik E. Value of 12 lead electrocardiogram and derived methodologies in the diagnosis of Brugada disease. In: Antzelevitch C., Brugada P., Brugada J., Brugada R., editors. The Brugada syndrome: from bench to Bedside. Blackwell Futura; USA: 2005. pp. 87–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nikus K., Perez-Riera A.R., Konttila K. Electrocardiographic recognition of right ventricular hypertrophy. J Electrocardiol. 2018;51:46–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Luna Filho B., Bocanegra J.A., Pfeferman A. Fascicular block of the His bundle: critical approach for its identification. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1989;53:261–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lev M. The conduction system. In: Gould S., editor. Pathology of the heart and blood vessels. third ed. Charles C. Thomas Publisher; Springfield, IL: 1968. p. 185. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mahaim J. Masson & Cie; Paris: 1931. Les maladies organiques du faisceau de His-Tawara. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Medrano G.A., de Micheli A., Iturralde P. Peripheral heart blocks associated with myocardial infarcts: clinical diagnosis based on experimental findings. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2008;4:140–147. doi: 10.2174/157340308784245784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.De Micheli A., Medrano G.A. México: La Prensa Médica Mexicana; 1971. Electrocardiograma y vectocadio-grama en el infarto del miocardio. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gallagher J.J., Sealy W.L., Richet L.E. Epicardial mapping in the WPW syndrome. In: AA W., editor. Review of contemporary laboratory methods. Am Heart Ass. Inc; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pastore C.A., Moffa P.J., Tobias N.M. Segmental blocks of the right bundle-branch and electrically inactive areas. Differential electro-vectorcardiographic diagnosis. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1985;45:309–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Perez-Riera A.R., Ferreira Filho C., de Abreu L.C. Do patients with electrocardiographic Brugada type 1 pattern have associated right bundle branch block? A comparative vectorcardiographic study. Europace. 2012;14:889–897. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES