Abstract
Osteosarcoma (OSA) is an aggressive mesenchymal tumor of the bone that affects children and occurs spontaneously in dogs. Human and canine OSA share similar clinical, biological and genetic features, which make dogs an excellent comparative model to investigate the etiology and pathogenesis of OSA. Mitochondrial (mt) defects have been reported in many different cancers including OSA, although it is not known whether these defects contribute to OSA progression and metastasis. Taking a comparative approach using canine OSA cell lines and tumor tissues we investigated the effects of mtDNA content and dysfunction on OSA biology. OSA tumor tissues had low mtDNA contents compared to the matched non-tumor tissues. We observed mitochondrial heterogeneity among the OSA cell lines and the most invasive cells expressing increased levels of OSA metastasis genes contained the highest amount of mitochondrial defects (reduced mtDNA copies, mt respiration, and expression of electron transport chain proteins). While mitochondria maintain a filamentous network in healthy cells, the mitochondrial morphology in OSA cells were mostly “donut shaped”, typical of “stressed” mitochondria. Moreover the expression levels of mitochondrial retrograde signaling proteins Akt1, IGF1R, hnRNPA2 and NFkB correlated with the invasiveness of the OSA cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate the causal role of mitochondrial defects in inducing the invasive phenotype by Ethidium Bromide induced-mtDNA depletion in OSA cells. Our data suggest that defects in mitochondrial genome and function are prevalent in OSA and that lower mtDNA content is associated with higher tumor cell invasiveness. We propose that mt defects in OSA might serve as a prognostic biomarker and a target for therapeutic intervention in OSA patients.
Introduction
Osteosarcoma (OSA) is an aggressive neoplasia of the bone, which affects human children and older, large and giant breed canines [1–3]. It accounts for about 85% of all primary bone tumors in both species [4]. The malignant neoplasm arises from osteoblasts and can manifest as both osteoproductive and osteolytic lesions [4]. In both species, the tumor most commonly occurs in the metaphyseal regions of the long bones including the humerus, femur, radius, tibia, and ulna [5–7]. In human patients, treatment consists of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery. In canines current OSA treatment involves limb amputation, chemotherapy, and palliative radiation [8–12]. Even with aggressive treatment strategies, metastatic disease leads to high mortality rates in humans and canines [13–15]. The poor prognosis makes it imperative to investigate the etiology and pathogenesis of OSA to identify new molecular markers and design effective treatments for both human and canine patients. Given the similarities in the occurrence, biology, behavior and molecular features between human and canine OSA, identification of novel prognostic markers and therapeutic targets explored in either species can be evaluated further for their relevance in the comparative model for developing treatment modalities.
Mitochondrial dysfunction caused by mtDNA mutations, deletions, and depletion have been widely reported in different types of cancers including OSA [16,17]. It is reported that tumors with an aggressive phenotype have impaired mitochondrial function and increased glycolytic metabolism [18–28]. Reports suggest that mtDNA mutations and electron transport chain (ETC) complex defects can enhance tumor aggressiveness through increased ROS production, constitutive activation of nuclear genes involved in cell survival and angiogenesis, and resistance to apoptosis [29,30]. We earlier reported that mitochondrial dysfunction, and the subsequent loss of transmembrane potential (ΔΨm), elevates cytosolic Ca2+ levels and activates the calcineurin dependent mitochondria-to-nucleus retrograde signaling (MtRS) pathway [31,32]. This pathway activates the nuclear transcription factors NFκB, C/EBPδ, CREB, and NFAT resulting in transcriptional activation of oncogenes such as Akt1, glucose transporter (Glut4), Ryanodine receptor (RyR1) and Cathepsin L [33–35]. Furthermore, hnRNPA2, an RNA-binding protein, is activated in response to mtDNA depletion and acts as a transcriptional coactivator to propagate MtRS [34–36]. Indeed, consistent with these findings we have also found that reducing mtDNA copy number in different non-tumorigenic immortalized cell lines causes a metabolic shift to glycolysis, and results in their transformation to tumorigenic cells [20,31,32,34–37].
In many cancers, it has been reported that patients that have tumors with mtDNA defects have a poor prognosis [38–42]. We recently reported that aggressive breast tumors have higher prevalence of mitochondrial defects [27]. Here we investigated the contribution of mitochondrial dysfunction to the aggressive behavior of OSA with the goal of determining possible prognostic significance and identifying new druggable molecular targets for relapsed, aggressive OSA. We hypothesize that mtDNA defects contribute to OSA progression and metastasis and as such may represent a valuable prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for future exploration.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The canine OSA cell lines SK-KOSA, MC-KOSA, and BW-KOSA were obtained from the NCI- Canine Comparative Oncolgy Genomics Consortium (CCOGC) [43]. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin, and 0.1% Fungizone. Reduction in mtDNA copy number was achieved by treating cell lines with 50 ng/mL of ethidium bromide (EtBr) for three passages. MtDNA depleted cells were supplemented with 1 mm pyruvate and 50 μg/ml uridine. Cells were stored in 37°C and 5% CO2 and were passaged at 70–80% confluence. MtDNA depleted cell lines were designated SK-KOSA+EB, MC-KOSA+EB, and BW-KOSA+EB.
Canine OSA tissues
Canine primary tumor and non-tumor “control” tissues were obtained from canine OSA patients directly following limb amputation surgery. This research was approved by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol number: 806287). Biopsies were obtained from three different regions of the tumor to assess intra-tumor heterogeneity in mtDNA contents. For comparison of mtDNA content, non-tumor skeletal muscle tissue from two regions surrounding the tumor was used. Of the five patients that were included in this study, three had received only chemotherapy treatment with carboplatin at the time of tissue collection and two had received an experimental vaccine aimed at preventing metastatic disease, known as the listeria vaccine. Two patients later also received the vaccine. At the time this paper was written, all patients were alive with no evidence of metastatic disease.
Relative mtDNA content
At least three punch sections were taken from each tissue for replicates to rule out the effects of intratumor heterogeneity and each sample was analyzed in triplicate. MtDNA copy number was measured from total genomic DNA isolated from normal and tumor tissues using DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen Cat # 69504). Using SYBR Green assay and quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) we amplified mtDNA (50 ng genomic DNA template) using primers specific for mtDNA encoded gene Cytochrome Oxidase subunit I (MT-COI) and normalized using a nuclear encoded single copy gene Cytochrome c Oxidase subunit IVi1 (CcO IVi1). Data analysis was done using the ΔΔCT method. This method of analysis estimates mtDNA copy number relative to a single copy nuclear gene as an internal reference gene [28,36,44]. Taking into consideration that tumors often have nuclear genome polyploidy due to chromosomal instability, in preliminary experiments, we used two nuclear encoded single copy genes, 36B4 and CcOIVi1, coded on different chromosomes, as reference genes for normalization. Although there are possible inter individual differences in the transcripts of nuclear coded genes in tumors, the overall patterns of mtDNA content among our comparisons remained unchanged irrespective of the gene of reference.
Western immunoblot
Total cell lysates were prepared by solubilizing cell pellets in NP-40 lysis buffer (150mM NaCl, 1.0% NP-40, and 50mM Tris-Cl pH 8.0, containing protease inhibitors). 50μg protein were suspended in Laemmli sample buffer and resolved by electrophoresis on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels [45] and subjected to immunoblot analysis. The protein levels were estimated by the Lowry method [46]. The immunoreactivity of the primary antibodies used in this study had not been previously tested in canine samples, so the time and concentration of each antibody was standardized in preliminary experiments in canine lysates. All secondary antibodies were IgG antibodies from LI-COR Biosciences and were specific to the species of the primary antibody. The blots were analyzed on a LI-COR Odyssey Infrared Imaging System and quantitated using Image J. To confirm equal protein loading, blots were re-probed with actin antibody. The fluorescence intensity of each immunoreactive protein band was normalized to the fluorescence of the corresponding actin band. pAkt was first compared with actin, then this value was divided by Akt to show the comparative activation. SK- or BW-KOSA (as indicated in the figures) was set to one as a comparison. Representative blots from 3–4 independent experiments are presented here.
Antibodies
All antibodies were diluted in 1x PBS+ 0.05% Tween20 (0.05%PBST).
hnRNPA2 (1:750): Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX; Cat # sc-32316.
IGF-1Rβ (1:2000): Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX; Cat # sc-713
Akt (1:2000): Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX; Cat # sc-1619
p-Akt (1:2000): Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA; cat # 9271
p50 (1:1000): Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX; Cat # sc-8414
OPA1 (1:1000): Abcam, Cambridge, MA; Cat # ab157457
DRP1 (1:1000): Abcam, Cambridge, MA; Cat # ab184247
Immunocytochemistry
Cells (2x105 cells per well on a 6-well plate) were grown overnight in growth medium on Poly-D Lysine coverslips. Cell adherence and confluence was confirmed before processing. After 24h of cell seeding, cells were washed with 1X PBS and fixed in ice-cold methanol for 10 minutes, at room temperature. Fixed cells were blocked in a buffer containing 1% BSA and were incubated with primary antibodies (as indicated in the figures) for 1 hour at 37°C. Immunostained cells were imaged using a Leica confocal microscope under a 100X objective.
Mitochondrial respiration
Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) were carried out in a XF24 Seahorse Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, Billerica, MA, USA) using 2.5 × 103 cells as described before [20,27,28]. An equal number of cells was counted and seeded on the XF24 culture plates 6h prior to performing the assay to rule out differences in proliferation rates between cell types. Thirty minutes prior to the OCR and ECAR measurements, the growth medium of the cells was replaced with unbuffered assay medium containing 10 mM glucose in the absence of CO2.
Growth curve
Growth patterns were measured by seeding cells at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well in 24-well culture plates as described earlier [34]. Cells from three wells at each time point were harvested and counted in a Guava personal cytometer according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Millipore, Billerica MA).
Matrigel invasion assay
The in vitro invasion assays were carried out as described previously [47]. The Matrigel invasion chambers were prepared at 1:2 dilution of Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Belford, MA) as described before [34]. Equal numbers of viable cells (4 × 104) were seeded on top of the Matrigel layer. After incubation for 24 h at 37°C, non-invading cells in the Matrigel layer were quantitatively removed, and the microporous membrane containing cells that migrated across the Matrigel layer and through the microporous membrane was stained and viewed under an Olympus BX 61 bright field microscope as described before [34]. At least six fields were examined within any one experiment for each condition and a representative image for each cell line is presented.
Quantitative real time PCR
Total cellular RNA was prepared using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen Cat # 74104). Genomic DNA was eliminated from the RNA preparations using Turbo DNA Free kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). 1μg RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using High Capacity reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). 100 ng cDNA was used for each SYBR Green reaction for transcript analysis of Ezrin, β4 Integrin and Cullin-1. Quantitative Real Time PCR assays were run on an ABI Quant Studio 6 real time thermocycler (Applied Biosystems). The nuclear gene GAPDH was used as an endogenous control. All real time PCR assays were run in triplicate. Data are presented as Relative Quantification (RQ).
The primer sequences used are as follows:
Ezrin
Forward primer 5’-GTTGATGCCCTTGGAC-3’,
Reverse primer 5’-GGTGCCTTCTTGTCG-3’
β4 Integrin
Forward primer 5’-TCATGAGCCGCAATGATGAG-3’,
Reverse primer 5’-TGATGGATAGTCCTGTGTCTTGTACTG-3’
Cullin-1
Forward primer 5’-CTTAGAAGCCCAGTCAACACCAT-3’,
Reverse primer 5’-GGCCTTTCACAATATTTGCCATA-3’
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was done using one-tail paired Student’s t-test. P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant and indicated by an asterisk (*).
Results
Inherent heterogeneity in mtDNA content among osteosarcomas
We analyzed five canine patient OSA tumor tissues for their mtDNA content by comparing mtDNA encoded CcO1 gene to the nuclear encoded CcOIVi1 gene. To exclude the possibility that intra-tumor heterogeneity can account for the variations in mtDNA content, we have analyzed atleast 3 punch biopsies from each tumor and non-tumor tissue. The mtDNA copy numbers between the different punch biopsies from the same patient remained similar with no statistical difference. Non-tumor muscle tissue (of mesenchymal origin, as is osteosarcoma) from the same patient was used as a control. We observed that OSA tumors had lower mtDNA content than non-tumor tissues taken from the same patient (Fig 1A). There is heterogeneity in the mtDNA content among both tumor as well as non-tumor “control” samples. We used statistical analysis to conclude that the mtDNA content is lower in tumor tissues compared to the non-tumor normal tissues.
We next analyzed three canine OSA cell lines and observed heterogeneity in mtDNA copy numbers among these cells. Comparisons between the ‘parental’ cell lines were made to determine inherent mitochondrial heterogeneity among different OSA cells. MC-KOSA inherently had lower mtDNA content than SK-KOSA and BW-KOSA cells (Fig 1B). This suggests that there is inherent variation in mtDNA levels among osteosarcomas which could potentially determine OSA aggressiveness.
Reduced mtDNA content correlates with altered mitochondrial morphology, dynamics and respiratory function in OSA cells
To investigate the causal role of mtDNA defects, we partially depleted mtDNA copy number (90% depleted compared to the parental mtDNA content) in the OSA cell lines (SK-KOSA, MC-KOSA, and BW-KOSA) by ethidium bromide (EtBr) treatment as previously described [28,31,32]. As reported earlier, these treatments do not affect nDNA content [28,48–51]. The resulting SK-KOSA+EB, MC-KOSA+EB, and BW-KOSA+EB cell lines each contained 10% of their parental mtDNA content (S1 Fig).
We hypothesized that aggressive OSA tumors have mitochondrial defects that potentially contribute to their aggressiveness. We investigated whether there is a correlation between mtDNA content and mitochondrial morphological alterations (fragmentation, loss of filamentous network) in the different OSA cell lines. Healthy functional mitochondria have filamentous network morphology and under cellular stress conditions such as hypoxia or osmotic pressure changes, mitochondria acquire a “donut-shaped” morphology [52,53]. Mitochondrial fragmentation has been reported to occur under different physiological or pathological conditions. We observed the presence of “donut-shaped” circular mitochondria along with filamentous mitochondria in the three OSA cell lines and MC-KOSA cell line which had the lowest mtDNA content showed the highest prevalence of circular “donut-shaped” mitochondria and a loss of mitochondrial network. We also found that expression of the electron transport chain (ETC) proteins ATP5B (Fig 2A) and CcOIVi1 (Fig 2B) was reduced in MC-KOSA cells compared to SK-KOSA and BW-KOSA cells.
Furthermore, experimentally reducing mtDNA content, by EtBr treatment, in these cell lines resulted in loss of mitochondrial filaments suggesting that reduction in mtDNA content impacts mitochondrial morphology. The expression of mitochondrial proteins ATP5B and CcOIVi1 is markedly reduced in the mtDNA-depleted cell lines compared to the corresponding parental cells (S2 Fig). This suggests that reduced mtDNA content correlates with and plays a causal role in the loss of mitochondrial filaments and reduced levels of electron transport chain proteins which are essential to maintain normal mitochondrial function.
Mitochondria are highly dynamic cell organelles, and a balance of mitochondrial fusion and fission is critical for maintaining mitochondrial functions and cellular signaling [54–57]. Several proteins have been reported to be involved in mitochondrial fusion-fission dynamics, including OPA1, which controls inner membrane fusion, and Drp1, which is recruited to the outer membrane for fission [21,58–61]. By immunocytochemistry as well as immunoblot, we observed elevated levels of mitochondrial fission marker DRP1 (Fig 3A and 3B) and lower level of mitochondrial fusion marker OPA1 (S3 Fig) in MC-KOSA cells compared to SK-KOSA and BW-KOSA cells. This suggests that lower mtDNA content is associated with higher mitochondrial fission in MC-KOSA cells and that reduction in mtDNA content influences mitochondrial dynamics.
To evaluate the mitochondrial functions, we analyzed the cellular respiratory capacity of KOSA cell lines using a Seahorse Flux Analyzer. The MC-KOSA cell line which contained the lowest mtDNA content and most dramatic loss of the mitochondrial network, had the lowest mitochondrial respiratory capacity (Fig 4A). Reduction of mtDNA content further impaired mitochondrial respiratory function in SK-KOSA-EB, MC-KOSA-EB, and BW-KOSA-EB respectively (Fig 4B). Additionally, EtBr mediated mtDNA depletion further reduced mitochondrial respiration and also reduced basal respiration, ATP production, and maximal respiration in SK-KOSA-EB, MC-KOSA-EB, and BW-KOSA-EB compared to their parental cell lines (Fig 4A–4B). These results suggest that mitochondrial functional defects observed in OSA are associated with low mtDNA contents, and that the degree of functional impairment correlates with the loss of mtDNA copies.
Mitochondrial defects correlate with the activation of nuclear protein markers of mitochondrial retrograde signal
We previously reported in multiple immortalized murine and human cells and cancer cell lines that calcium-calcineurin mediated retrograde signaling (MtRS) is activated in response to mtDNA depletion, loss of electron transport chain proteins and disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential [21,31,32,34,37,62]. We have shown that dysfunctional mitochondria induce a mitochondria-to-nucleus retrograde signaling (MtRS) pathway that results in the activation of PI3-kinase, IGF-1R, and Akt1, which are all involved in metabolic shift to preferentially glycolysis and tumorigenic phenotype [19,34,35,37]. Nuclear transcription factor NFkB (p50:cRel) is activated in response to mitochondrial stress. Furthermore, we have shown that activation of the heterogeneous nuclear ribonuclear protein hnRNPA2, which acts as a transcriptional co-activator of nuclear oncogenes, occurs in response to mitochondrial stress and is critical for propagation of MtRS and tumorigenic reprogramming [21,36,63].
Based on these previous findings, we analyzed the protein expression levels of MtRS marker proteins in the OSA cell lines. We observed higher levels of the MtRS marker proteins IGF-1R, Akt1, hnRNPA2 and NFkB (p50) in MC-KOSA cells compared with the other cell lines, suggesting that MtRS induction correlates with greater mitochondrial dysfunction and genomic defects in this cell line (Fig 5A–5C). As mentioned in the materials and methods section, the antibodies used here have not been previously tested in canine species and therefore the faster migrating bands we observed in the IGF-1Rβ and p50 western blots are possibly non-specific immunoreactive proteins. The higher levels of MtRS protein expression suggests the activation of the signaling pathway in response to mitochondrial dysfunction is dependent on the extent of the depletion of mtDNA.
Induction of OSA aggressive phenotype in response to mitochondrial stress
Biomarkers to identify aggressive potential of primary osteosarcomas are not well defined. Some markers reported to be associated with aggressive osteosarcomas are β4 Integrin, Ezrin, and Cullin-1. Integrins, such as β4 Integrin, are heterodimers comprised of α and β subunits and regulate many biological processes such as cell adhesion, signaling, migration, proliferation, survival, angiogenesis, oncogenesis, and metastasis [64–68]. We observed that the mRNA expression level of β4 Integrin is higher in MC-KOSA cells compared to SK-KOSA and BW-KOSA, which correlates with the higher levels of mitochondrial dysfunction in these cells (Fig 6A).
Ezrin is a cytoskeleton linker protein that belongs to the ezrin, radixin, and moesin (ERM) family [69]. It is reported to influence the cellular processes involved in metastatic transition by physically connecting the actin cytoskeleton with the cell membrane and thus engaging the cancer microenvironment [70]. We observed that the mRNA level of Ezrin is higher in MC-KOSA cells compared to SK-KOSA and BW-KOSA. OSA tumors, which contained lower mtDNA copies (Fig 1A), have higher Ezrin mRNA compared to matched non-tumor control tissues which further suggests the correlation between mtDNA content and tumorigenesis (Fig 6B).
To address if reduction of mtDNA content played a causal role in induction of the marker genes of aggressive OSA, we selected SK-KOSA cells, which had the highest mtDNA content and low expression of the tumor marker genes, and investigated the effect of mtDNA depletion in this cell line. Compared to parental SK-KOSA cells, mtDNA depletion in SK-KOSA cells resulted in higher levels of the markers β4 Integrin, Cullin-1 and Ezrin suggesting a causal role of mtDNA depletion in the induction of the marker genes that drive tumor progression (Fig 6C).
The cellular processes involved in tumor progression towards metastasis is complex. During initial stages of the metastatic process, aggressive tumor cells from within the primary tumor acquire the potential to invade into the surrounding host tissue. This invasive potential is recapitulated in an in vitro Matrigel invasion assay where the capacity of cells to invade and migrate through the Matrigel layer enriched with components of the tumor microenvironment is assessed. We found that SK-KOSA and BW-KOSA are non-invasive, while MC-KOSA is highly invasive as shown by the cells that migrated across the Matrigel layer (Fig 7A, top panel) further suggesting the association of low mtDNA content with invasive phenotype. Interestingly, chemically depleting mtDNA content in the non-invasive SK-KOSA and BW–KOSA cells resulted in these cells acquiring an invasive phenotype (Fig 7A, lower panel) thereby suggesting a causal role of mtDNA depletion towards invasive potential of tumor cells. As expected, depletion of mtDNA content in the low mtDNA containing, highly invasive MC-KOSA cells, did not have any further effect on their invasive potential.
The differences in the invasive potential among the cell lines is independent of the cell proliferation as shown in Fig 7B (Bottom panel). MC-KOSA which has high invasiveness among the three cell lines, has the lowest cell proliferation rate (Fig 7B, left panel). The EtBr treated mtDNA-depleted SK-KOSA and BW-KOSA are highly invasive have lower cell growth rate compared to their parental cells (Fig 7B, right panel). While increased cell proliferation is typical during tumor initiation, higher cell proliferation is not a requirement for tumor progression (invasion, metastasis). Therefore, our result here is in agreement with reports that there is no correlation between cell proliferation and aggressive potential of the primary tumor.
Taken together, these data suggest a causal role between reduced mtDNA content and associated mitochondrial dysfunction and development of an invasive, metastatic phenotype.
Discussion
Osteosarcomas in canine and human patients share common clinical, biological, behavioral and genetic features. The disease is highly metastatic in both species and effective therapies for the treatment or prevention of metastatic disease remain elusive. Although human and canine patients differ in the average age of onset of the disease [71–73] they share clinical and molecular prognostic markers. Mitochondrial defects have been associated with aggressive phenotypes in many different cancer types, and low mtDNA content has also been associated with chemoresistance and poor prognosis [28,39–41,74,75]. Our earlier reports, which show that mtDNA dysfunction-induced mitochondria-to-nucleus retrograde signaling (MtRS) pathway [21,31,32,34,35,37,62] influences tumorigenesis and our findings reported here suggest that mitochondrial defects and MtRS markers could potentially be biomarkers for identifying highly aggressive OSA.
Although the prognostic relevance of mitochondrial defects has been reported in many cancers, to date there has been very little information on the relationship between mitochondrial defects in canine OSA and their association with tumor aggression. In this study our goal was to determine whether mtDNA content and dysfunction were associated with an aggressive phenotype in canine OSA and whether we could identify mitochondrial dysfunction-associated molecular markers which in future can be used as therapeutic targets. We observed inherent heterogeneity in mtDNA content and mitochondrial dysfunction amongst the OSA cell lines and tumors which reflects the heterogeneity seen in OSA progression and prognosis in canine and human OSA patients. Furthermore, we identified mitochondrial genomic and functional defects in canine OSA cell lines and primary tumors that could potentially influence tumor progression and metastasis.
In addition to low mtDNA copy number, we identified marked loss of the mitochondrial filamentous network as well as altered mitochondrial fission. These correlated with the extent of reduction in mtDNA copy number and invasive potential, suggesting that reduction in mtDNA copy number could be used as a prognostic marker for OSA. The changes in mitochondrial fission in the most aggressive MC-KOSA cell line suggests that targeting mitochondrial fission may provide a therapeutic opportunity to rescue mitochondrial functions and reverse the metastatic progression. Notably, therapeutic targeting of mitochondria fission by mDivi-1, a DRP1 inhibitor, has been shown to abrogate mitochondrial stress and reverse the tumorigenic phenotype [76].
Our findings that impairment of mitochondrial electron transport chain function is dependent on mtDNA content further confirms the interdependence of mitochondrial membrane potential and an efficient respiration process reported earlier [77]. In agreement with these earlier studies, we now demonstrate that mtDNA depletion in canine OSA cell lines induces the activation of genes associated with MtRS including Akt1, IGF-1R and hnRNPA2. Importantly, our results show that mtDNA depletion induced β4Integrin and Ezrin genes in the non-invasive SK-KOSA cell line resulting in an acquired invasive phenotype, which suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction plays a critical role in the complex metastatic process.
This study lays the foundation for evaluating agents that rescue mitochondrial functions and/or block the aberrant MtRS pathway, inhibit glycolysis, or down regulate the expression of MtRS markers, which might provide new avenues of therapy for preventing metastatic disease in both human and canine OSA patients.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All data are contained within the manuscript files.
Funding Statement
This research is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant CA22762 (NGA), NIH Grant T35 OD-010919 (MJ) and a grant from Merial LTD (NS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Mueller F, Fuchs B, Kaser-Hotz B. Comparative biology of human and canine osteosarcoma. Anticancer Res. 2007;27: 155–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Withrow SJ, Powers BE, Straw RC, Wilkins RM. Comparative aspects of osteosarcoma: Dog versus man. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991: 159–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Federman N, Bernthal N, Eilber FC, Tap WD. The Multidisciplinary Management of Osteosarcoma. Curr Treat Options Oncology. 2009; 10:82–93. 10.1007/s11864-009-0087-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Selvarajah GT, Kirpensteijn J. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers of canine osteosarcoma. Vet J. 2010; 185:28–35. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liptak JM, Dernell WS, Straw RC, Rizzo SA, Lafferty MH, Withrow SJ. Proximal Radial and Distal Humeral Osteosarcoma in 12 Dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2004; 40:461–7. 10.5326/0400461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Knecht CD, Priester WA. Musculoskeletal tumors in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1978; 172:72–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brodey RS, Riser WH. Canine osteosarcoma. A clinicopathologic study of 194 cases. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1969; 62:54–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brodey RS, Abt DA. Results of surgical treatment in 65 dogs with osteosarcoma. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1976; 168:1032–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tomlin JL, Sturgeon C, Pead MJ, Muir P. Use of the bisphosphonate drug alendronate for palliative management of osteosarcoma in two dogs. Vet Rec. 2000; 147:129–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dow S, Elmsli R, Kurzman I, Macewen G, Pericle F, Liggitt D. Phase I Study of Liposome–DNA Complexes Encoding the Interleukin-2 Gene in Dogs with Osteosarcoma Lung Metastases. Hum Gene Ther. 2005;16: 937–46. 10.1089/hum.2005.16.937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Walter CU, Dernell WS, LaRue SM, Lana SE, Lafferty MH, LaDue TA, et al. Curative‐intent radiation therapy as a treatment modality for appendicular and axial osteosarcoma: a preliminary retrospective evaluation of 14 dogs with the disease. Vet Comp Oncol. 2005; 3:1–7. 10.1111/j.1476-5810.2005.00062.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fan D, Fan Q, Dai J, Tang J, Wu M, Sun S, et al. Silencing of calpain expression reduces the metastatic potential of human osteosarcoma cells. Cell Biol Int. 2009; 33:1263–7. 10.1016/j.cellbi.2009.08.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gupta GP, Massagué J. Cancer Metastasis: Building a Framework. Cell. 2006;127: 679–695. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mehlen P, Puisieux A. Metastasis: a question of life or death. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006; 6:449–58. 10.1038/nrc1886 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Steeg PS. Tumor metastasis: mechanistic insights and clinical challenges. Nat Med. 2006; 12:895–904. 10.1038/nm1469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chatterjee A, Mambo E, Sidransky D. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in human cancer. Oncogene. 2006; 25:4663–74. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wallace SS, Murphy DL, Sweasy JB. Base excision repair and cancer. Cancer Lett. 2012; 327:73–89. 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Nature. 1956;469: 314–322. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Srinivasan S, Guha M, Dong DW, Whelan KA, Ruthel G, Uchikado Y, et al. Disruption of cytochrome c oxidase function induces the Warburg effect and metabolic reprogramming. Oncogene. 2016; 35: 1585–95. 10.1038/onc.2015.227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Srinivasan S, Guha M, Avadhani NG. Mitochondrial respiratory defects promote the Warburg effect and cancer progression. Mol Cell Oncol. 2015;3: e1085120 10.1080/23723556.2015.1085120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Srinivasan S, Guha M, Kashina A, Avadhani NG. Mitochondrial dysfunction and mitochondrial dynamics-The cancer connection. Biochim et Biophys Acta. 2017; 1858:602–614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gallardo EM, Moreno‐Loshuertos R, López C, Mercedes C, Javier S, Felix B, et al. m.6267G>A: a recurrent mutation in the human mitochondrial DNA that reduces cytochrome c oxidase activity and is associated with tumors. Hum Mutat. 2006; 27:575–82. 10.1002/humu.20338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dasgupta S, Hoque MO, Upadhyay S, Sidransky D. Mitochondrial Cytochrome B Gene Mutation Promotes Tumor Growth in Bladder Cancer. Cancer Res. 2008; 68:700–6. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dakubo GD, Parr RL, Costello LC, Franklin RB, Thayer RE. Altered metabolism and mitochondrial genome in prostate cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59: 10–6. 10.1136/jcp.2005.027664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pelicano H, Xu R, Du M, Feng L, Sasaki R, Carew JS, et al. Mitochondrial respiration defects in cancer cells cause activation of Akt survival pathway through a redox-mediated mechanism. J Cell Biol. 2006;175(6): 913–23. 10.1083/jcb.200512100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dong DW, Srinivasan S, Guha M, Avadhani NG. Defects in cytochrome c oxidase expression induce a metabolic shift to glycolysis and carcinogenesis. Genom data. 2015; 6:99–107. 10.1016/j.gdata.2015.07.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Guha M, Srinivasan S, Raman P, Jiang Y, Kaufman BA, Taylor D, et al. Aggressive triple negative breast cancers have unique molecular signature on the basis of mitochondrial genetic and functional defects. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2018; 1864: 1060–1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guha M, Srinivasan S, Ruthel G, Kashina AK, Carstens RP, Mendoza A, et al. Mitochondrial retrograde signaling induces epithelial–mesenchymal transition and generates breast cancer stem cells. Oncogene. 2014; 33:5238–50. 10.1038/onc.2013.467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ishikawa K, Hashizume O, Koshikawa N, Fukuda S, Nakada K, Takenaga K, et al. Enhanced glycolysis induced by mtDNA mutations does not regulate metastasis. FEBS Letters. 2008; 582:3525–3530. 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.09.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kulawiec M, Owens KM, Singh KK. Cancer cell mitochondria confer apoptosis resistance and promote metastasis. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009; 8:1378–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Biswas G, Adebanjo OA, Freedman BD, Anandatheerthavarada HK, Vijayasarathy C, Zaidi M, et al. Retrograde Ca2+ signaling in C2C12 skeletal myocytes in response to mitochondrial genetic and metabolic stress: a novel mode of inter-organelle crosstalk. EMBO J. 1999; 18:522–533. 10.1093/emboj/18.3.522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Amuthan G, Biswas G, Ananadatheerthavarada HK, Vijayasarathy C, Shephard HM, Avadhani NG. Mitochondrial stress-induced calcium signaling, phenotypic changes and invasive behavior in human lung carcinoma A549 cells. Oncogene. 2002; 21:7839–49. 10.1038/sj.onc.1205983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Biswas G, Guha M, Avadhani NG. Mitochondria-to-nucleus stress signaling in mammalian cells: Nature of nuclear gene targets, transcription regulation, and induced resistance to apoptosis. Gene. 2005; 354:132–9. 10.1016/j.gene.2005.03.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Guha M, Pan H, Fang JK, Avadhani NG. Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein A2 Is a Common Transcriptional Coactivator in the Nuclear Transcription Response to Mitochondrial Respiratory Stress. Mol Biol Cell. 2009; 20:4107–19. 10.1091/mbc.E09-04-0296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Guha M, Fang J, Monks R, Birnbaum MJ, Avadhani NG. Activation of Akt Is Essential for the Propagation of Mitochondrial Respiratory Stress Signaling and Activation of the Transcriptional Coactivator Heterogeneous Ribonucleoprotein A2. Mol Biol Cell. 2010; 21:3578–89. 10.1091/mbc.E10-03-0192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Guha M, Srinivasan S, Guja K, Mejia E, Garcia-Diaz M, Johnson FB, et al. HnRNPA2 is a novel histone acetyltransferase that mediates mitochondrial stress-induced nuclear gene expression. Cell Discov. 2016; 2:16045 10.1038/celldisc.2016.45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Guha M, Srinivasan S, Biswas G, Avadhani NG. Activation of a novel calcineurin-mediated insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor pathway, altered metabolism, and tumor cell invasion in cells subjected to mitochondrial respiratory stress. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282:14536–46. 10.1074/jbc.M611693200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Guha M, Srinivasan S, Ruthel G, Kashina AK, Carstens RP, Mendoza A, et al. Mitochondrial retrograde signaling induces epithelial–mesenchymal transition and generates breast cancer stem cells. Oncogene. 2014; 33:5238–50. 10.1038/onc.2013.467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yu M, Zhou Y, Shi Y, Ning L, Yang Y, Wei X, et al. Reduced mitochondrial DNA copy number is correlated with tumor progression and prognosis in Chinese breast cancer patients. IUBMB Life. 2007; 59:450–7. 10.1080/15216540701509955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Allalunis-Turner J, Ma I, Hanson J, Pearcey RG. mtDNA mutations in invasive cervix tumors: A retrospective analysis. Cancer Lett. 2006; 243:193–201. 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.11.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Frezza C. The role of mitochondria in the oncogenic signal transduction. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014; 48:11–17. 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.McMahon S, LaFramboise T. Mutational patterns in the breast cancer mitochondrial genome, with clinical correlates. Carcinogenesis. 2014; 35:1046–54. 10.1093/carcin/bgu012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Paoloni M, Davis S, Lana S, Withrow S, Sangiorgi L, Picci P, et al. Canine tumor cross-species genomics uncovers targets linked to osteosarcoma progression. BMC Genomics. 2009; 10:625 10.1186/1471-2164-10-625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Guha M, Srinivasan S, Raman P, Jiang Y, Kaufman BA, Taylor D, et al. Aggressive triple negative breast cancers have unique molecular signature on the basis of mitochondrial genetic and functional defects. BBA—Molecular Basis of Disease. 2018; 1864:1060–71. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Laemmli UK. Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227:680–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951; 193:265–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yagel S, Warner AH, Nellans HN, Lala PK, Waghorne C, Denhardt DT. Suppression by cathepsin L inhibitors of the invasion of amnion membranes by murine cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1989; 49:3553–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.King MP, Attardi G. Injection of mitochondria into human cells leads to a rapid replacement of the endogenous mitochondrial DNA. Cell. 1988; 52:811–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wiseman A, Attardi G. Reversible tenfold reduction in mitochondrial DNA content of human cells treated with ethidium bromide. Mol Gen Genet. 1978; 167:51–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Li X, Zhong Y, Lu J, Axcrona K, Eide L, Sylijuasen RG, et al. MtDNA depleted PC3 cells exhibit Warburg effect and cancer stem cell features. Oncotarget. 2016; 7: 40297–40313. 10.18632/oncotarget.9610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Moro L, Arbini AA, Yao JL, di Sant’Agnese PA, Marra E, Greco M. Mitochondrial DNA depletion in prostate epithelial cells promotes anoikis resistance and invasion through activation of P13K/Akt2. Cell Death Differ. 2009; 16(4):571–83. 10.1038/cdd.2008.178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Liu X, Hajnóczky G. Altered fusion dynamics underlie unique morphological changes in mitochondria during hypoxia-reoxygenation stress. Cell Death Differ. 2011; 18:1561–1572. 10.1038/cdd.2011.13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Long Q, Zhao D, Fan W, Yang L, Zhou Y, Qi J, et al. Modeling of Mitochondrial Donut Formation. Biophys J. 2015; 109(5):892–9. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.07.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Twig G, Hyde B, Shirihai OS. Mitochondrial fusion, fission and autophagy as a quality control axis: The bioenergetic view. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008; 1777:1092–7. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shaw JM, Nunnari J. Mitochondrial dynamics and division in budding yeast. Trends Cell Biol. 2002; 12: 178–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Twig G, Elorza A, Molina AJ, Mohamed H, Wikstrom JD, Walzer G, et al. Fission and selective fusion govern mitochondrial segregation and elimination by autophagy. EMBO J. 2008; 27:433–46. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ni H, Williams JA, Ding W. Mitochondrial dynamics and mitochondrial quality control. Redox Biol. 2015; 4:6–13. 10.1016/j.redox.2014.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chan DC. Mitochondria: dynamic organelles in disease, aging, and development. Cell. 2006; 125(7): 1241–52. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cipolat S, de Brito OM, Dal Zilio B, Scorrano L. OPA1 requires mitofusin 1 to promote mitochondrial fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101:15927–32. 10.1073/pnas.0407043101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Smirnova E, Griparic L, Shurland D, van der Bliek AM. Dynamin-related Protein Drp1 Is Required for Mitochondrial Division in Mammalian Cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2001; 12:2245–56. 10.1091/mbc.12.8.2245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chen E. Mitochondrial dysfunction and cancer metastasis. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2012; 44:619–22. 10.1007/s10863-012-9465-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Biswas G, Anandatheerthavarada HK, Zaidi M, Avadhani NG. Mitochondria to nucleus stress signaling: a distinctive mechanism of NFkappaB/Rel activation through calcineurin-mediated inactivation of IkappaBbeta. J Cell Biol. 2003; 161:507–519. 10.1083/jcb.200211104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Moro L, Arbini AA, Yao JL, di Sant’Agnese PA, Marra E, Greco M. Mitochondrial DNA depletion in prostate epithelial cells promotes anoikis resistance and invasion through activation of PI3K/Akt2. Cell Death Differ. 2009; 16:571–83. 10.1038/cdd.2008.178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Aplin AE, Howe A, Alahari SK, Juliano RL. Signal Transduction and Signal Modulation by Cell Adhesion Receptors: The Role of Integrins, Cadherins, Immunoglobulin-Cell Adhesion Molecules, and Selectins. Pharmacol Rev. 1998; 50:197–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Giancotti FG, Ruoslathi E. Integrin Signaling. Science. 1999; 285:1028–1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hood JD, Bednarski M, Frausto R, Guccione S, Reisfeld RA, Xiang R, et al. Tumor Regression by Targeted Gene Delivery to the Neovasculature. Science. 2002; 296:2404–7. 10.1126/science.1070200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Howe A, Aplin AE, Alahari SK, Juliano RL. Integrin signaling and cell growth control. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998; 10:220–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hynes RO. Integrins: Bidirectional, Allosteric Signaling Machines. Cell. 2002; 110:673–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Khanna C, Wan X, Bose S, Cassaday R, Olomu O, Mendoza A, et al. The membrane-cytoskeleton linker ezrin is necessary for osteosarcoma metastasis. Nat Med. 2004; 10:182–6. 10.1038/nm982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gorlick R, Chand K. Osteosarcoma. J Bone Miner Res. 2010; 25:683–91. 10.1002/jbmr.77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Spodnick GJ, Berg J, Rand WM, Schelling SH, Couto G, Harvey HJ, et al. Prognosis for dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma treated by amputation alone: 162 cases (1978–1988). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1992; 200:995–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Boston SE, Ehrhart NP, Dernell WS, Lafferty M, Withrow SJ. Evaluation of survival time in dogs with stage III osteosarcoma that undergo treatment: 90 cases (1985–2004). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006; 228:1905–8. 10.2460/javma.228.12.1905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ottaviani G, Jaffe N. The Epidemiology of Osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res. 2009; 152:3–13. 10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Reznik E, Miller ML, Senbabaglu Y, Riaz N, Sarungbam J, Tickoo SK et al. Mitochondrial DNA copy number variation across human cancers. Elife. 2016. February 22; 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.O’Shaughnessy J. Extending Survival with Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer. The Oncologist. 2005; 10:20–29. 10.1634/theoncologist.10-90003-20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Rehman J, Zhang HJ, Toth PT, Zhang Y, Marsboom G, Hong Z, et al. Inhibition of mitochondrial fission prevents cell cycle progression in lung cancer. FASEB J. 2012; 26:2175–86. 10.1096/fj.11-196543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Legros F, Lombes A, Frachon P, Rojo M. Mitochondrial Fusion in Human Cells Is Efficient, Requires the Inner Membrane Potential, and Is Mediated by Mitofusins. Mol Biol Cell. 2002; 13:4343–54. 10.1091/mbc.E02-06-0330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are contained within the manuscript files.