Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2018 Dec 21;9:5426. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07126-9

Loss of Phd2 cooperates with BRAFV600E to drive melanomagenesis

Shujing Liu 1, Gao Zhang 2, Jianping Guo 3, Xiang Chen 4, Jingce Lei 1, Kan Ze 1, Liyun Dong 1, Xiangpeng Dai 3, Yang Gao 3, Daisheng Song 1, Brett L Ecker 2, Ruifeng Yang 1, Caitlin Feltcher 1, Kai Peng 1, Cheng Feng 1, Hui Chen 1, Rebecca X Lee 1, Heddy Kerestes 1, Jingwen Niu 1, Suresh Kumar 1, Weiting Xu 5, Jie Zhang 5, Zhi Wei 5, James S Martin 1, Xiaoming Liu 1, Gordon Mills 6, Yiling Lu 6, Wei Guo 7, Lunquan Sun 4, Lin Zhang 8, Ashani Weeraratna 2, Meenhard Herlyn 2, Wenyi Wei 3, Frank S Lee 1,, Xiaowei Xu 1,
PMCID: PMC6303344  PMID: 30575721

Abstract

Prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 2 (PHD2) is a well-known master oxygen sensor. However, the role of PHD2 in tumor initiation remains controversial. We find that during the transition of human nevi to melanoma, the expression of PHD2 protein is significantly decreased and lower expression PHD2 in melanoma is associated with worse clinical outcome. Knockdown of PHD2 leads to elevated Akt phosphorylation in human melanocytes. Mice with conditional melanocyte-specific expression of Phd2lox/lox (Tyr::CreER;Phd2lox/lox) fail to develop pigmented lesions. However, deletion of Phd2 in combination with expression of BRafV600E in melanocytes (Tyr::CreER;Phd2lox/lox;BRafCA) leads to the development of melanoma with 100% penetrance and frequent lymph node metastasis. Analysis of tumor tissues using reverse phase protein arrays demonstrates that Phd2 deletion activates the AKT-mTOR-S6 signaling axis in the recovered tumors. These data indicate that PHD2 is capable of suppressing tumor initiation largely mediated through inhibiting of the Akt-mTOR signaling pathway in the melanocyte lineage.


Prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 2 (PHD2) regulates cellular response to hypoxia. Here the authors show that PHD2 is downregulated in melanoma and that PHD2 depletion, in a mouse model, promotes the progression of benign melanocytic lesions into melanoma, via activation of the Akt/mTOR signaling cascade.

Introduction

Prolyl hydroxylase domain proteins (PHDs), also referred to as hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylases or EGLNs, form an evolutionarily conserved subfamily of dioxygenases that hydroxylate HIFs within the oxygen-dependent degradation (ODD) domains13. Three mammalian PHD isoforms, PHD1, PHD2 and PHD3, demonstrate distinct tissue-specific expression patterns and cellular function4,5. Among three PHD isoforms, PHD2, also known as EGLN1, is a 46 kDa protein enzyme that consists of an N-terminal domain homologous to MYND zinc finger domains, and a C-terminal domain homologous to the 2-oxoglutarate family of dioxygenases. PHD2 is considered the master “oxygen sensor” in a cell, and PHD2 regulates the hypoxia-induced gene transcription program largely by controlling the stability of HIF-α through prolyl hydroxylation in a site-specific manner6,7. Prolyl hydroxylated HIF-α components are recognized by the von Hippel–Lindau protein (pVHL) which mediates their polyubiquitination with subsequent proteasomal degradation.

Melanocytes are more prone to oncogenic transformation when grown in a hypoxic microenvironment, and this is in part due to stabilization of HIF-1α, because HIF-1α-deficient melanocytes grown in hypoxic conditions show a diminished transformation capacity and delayed tumor growth in vivo. On the other hand, the expression of an non-degradable form of HIF-1α protein leads to transformation of cells in normoxic conditions and to the growth of very aggressive melanomas8. Hypoxia is a common feature in solid tumors including melanoma, and hypoxia promotes melanoma progression8,9. Loss of PHD2 function leads to increased HIF-1α activity, increased glycolysis and improved adaptation to hypoxia10,11. We and others showed that mutations in the human PHD2 gene are associated with erythrocytosis1214. Loss of heterozygosity of PHD2 in paraganglioma has been reported and suggests that PHD2 can function like a tumor suppressor gene12. Nevertheless, to date, the role of PHD2 in cancer progression remains controversial. It has been shown that PHD2 knockdown in breast cancer cells reduced the growth of xenograft tumors15, and that global Phd2 haplo-deficiency impairs tumor invasion and metastasis7,16. On the other hand, in vivo xenograft models supported a tumor-suppressing role of PHD2 in pancreatic cancer17,18.

More recently, prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (PHIs), such as roxadustat and produstat, are been tested in phase III clinically trials in patients with anemia (ClinicalTrials.gov). PHIs stimulate synthesis of renal and hepatic erythropoietin and improve hematocrit as well as stimulate neoangiogenesis19,20. Although PHIs appear to have a good safety profile in early phase clinical trials, long-term studies have not been performed. One significant concern regarding the long-term use of these agents is their possible effect on tumor growth21.

Here we show that melanocyte-specific deletion of Phd2 cooperates with BRafCA to induce melanomagenesis. Haplo-deficiency of Phd2 is also able to induce melanomagenesis despite a weaker effect. Phd2 deletion activates the AKT–mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling axis in tumor cells. These data support that PHD2 acts as a tumor suppressor in melanocytic tumors.

Results

PHD2 expression and function in human melanomas

To study the function of PHD2 in melanoma progression, we first determined expression of PHD2 by immunohistochemistry in a melanoma tissue microarray composed of 480 cores of benign nevi and melanomas22. PHD2 staining was evaluated in 126 cores of nevi and 266 cores of melanomas (Fig. 1a). We found that PHD2 was expressed in nevi with a higher percentage (90 out of 126; 71.4%) than that in melanomas (97 out of 266; 36.5%) (p = 0.0174) (Fig. 1b). To study the potential relationship between PHD2 expression and patient survival, we first sorted The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) patients into PHD2-high and PHD2-low groups according to PHD2 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels. As shown in Fig. 1c, the PHD2-high group represents an average RNA-Seq by Expectation Maximization (RSEM) level of 6385 (n = 22), which is significantly higher than PHD2-low group with an average RSEM level of 663.6 (n = 22). Next, we analyzed the difference in survival between these two groups using OncoLnc (http://www.oncolnc.org/). The Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed that the PHD2-high group have a significantly improved patient survival than PHD2-low group (Log rank p value = 0.00643) (Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

PHD2 expression and function in human melanocytes and melanomas. a IHC staining of PHD2 in 126 nevus and 266 melanoma specimens. A melanoma progression tissue microarray (TMA) was stained with the anti-PHD2 antibody and PHD2 staining positive and negative cases were calculated. Representative PHD2 positive (upper panel) and negative cases (lower panel) are shown. Bars indicate 100 µm. b Percentage of cases with PHD2 expression. There was significantly less percentage of melanoma cases with PHD2 expression than that of nevi; *p < 0.01. c. TCGA SKCM patients were sorted into PHD2-high and PHD2-low groups according to PHD2 mRNA expression levels (top 5% versus bottom 5%). d PHD2 expression and survival curve. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed that the PHD2-high group have a significantly improved patient survival than PHD2-low group (log rank p value = 0.00643). e PHD2 knockdown induces Akt phosphorylation. Immortalized human melanocytes (hTERT/p53DD/Cdc24R24C-BRAFV600E) were transfected with two independent PHD2 shRNAs. Cells transfected with shGFP were included as a negative control. Western blots were performed using the indicated antibodies. f Reintroduction of PHD2 in PHD2−/− MEFs reduces Akt phosphorylation. PHD2−/− MEFs (left lane) were transfected with wild-type PHD2 (lane adjacent to the left lane). PHD2-positive MEFs which express endogenous PHD2 were used as a control (right lane). g DFO or DMOG treatment. Immortalized human melanocytes were transfected with control vectors or EGLN knockdown vectors. These cells were than treated with DFO or DMOG. h Overexpressed HIF-2α in immortalized human melanocytes. i The melanoma-derived PHD2-P317 mutation inhibits PHD2 binding to HIF-1α. Biotin-labeled HIF1α-ODD peptides were incubated with WCLs derived from HEK293T cells transfected with the indicated PHD2 constructs (beads as negative control). Binding of PHD2 to HIF1α-ODD is abolished with the P317 mutation. j The PHD2-P317 mutation inhibits PHD2 and HIF-1α interaction. Unlike WT-PHD2, P317S-PHD2 is largely impaired in inhibiting HRE reporter activities detected by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System. The error bars indicate s.d.

Although molecular mechanisms underlying the transformation of nevus to melanoma have not been completely elucidated, the Akt–mTOR pathway has been implicated23. Thus, we tested whether decreased expression of PHD2 can activate the Akt pathway in human melanocytes. To this end, we knocked down PHD2 in immortalized human melanocytes (IHPM-VE cells) using two different short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), and found that knockdown of PHD2 led to stabilization of HIF-2α with elevated levels of Akt phosphorylation at both p-T308 and p-S473 as well as decreased expression of LC3B, an autophagy marker (Fig. 1e). To confirm a causal relationship between decreased PHD2 expression and elevated Akt activity, PHD2 was reintroduced into PHD2 knockout murine embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells. Expression of PHD2 led to a significant reduction in the phosphorylation of Akt, particularly at T308 (Fig. 1f), which is indicative of reduced Akt activity. To study the interaction between PHD2 knockdown and hypoxia, we treated the immortalized human melanocytes after PHD2 knockdown with desferrioxamine (DFO) or dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG, a cell-permeable prolyl-4-hydroxylase inhibitor) (Fig. 1g). Notably, DFO or DMOG treatment induced a further modest increase of Akt activity. When we overexpressed HIF-2α in the human melanocytes, moderately increased Akt phosphorylation was also observed (Fig. 1h). Similar results were observed after BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells cultured under 1% oxygen (Supplementary Fig. 1a) or expression of a non-degradable HIF-1α (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Interestingly, PHD2 expression was also regulated by hypoxia. However, the effect of hypoxia on PHD2 expression appeared to be cell line specific as two melanoma cell lines showed increased expression while the other two did not show significant change (Supplementary Fig. 2ad).

We analyzed the TCGA SKCM data then discovered a novel PHD2 mutation, P317S, in a melanoma patient. Interestingly, patients carrying a P317R mutation developed erythrocytosis, but its mechanistic connection to melanomagenesis is unknown24. Because the P317R mutation reduced HIF hydroxylase activity and the ability of PHD2 to interact with HIF, we examined whether the PHD2-P317S mutation was also deficient in its interaction with and subsequent hydroxylation of HIF. To this end, we carried out peptide binding assays by incubating biotin-labeled HIF1α-ODD peptides with transiently transfected PHD2 wild type (WT) or mutants (P317S and P317R). Notably, the WT, but not P317R or P317S PHD2, was capable of interacting with HIF1α-ODD (Fig. 1i), indicating that the Proline-317 residue plays a pivotal role in mediating the interaction of PHD2 with the well-characterized HIF1α-ODD domain. In keeping with this notion, we conducted reporter assays. The results of these assays showed that compared with WT-PHD2, the PHD2 mutant P317S could not efficiently suppress the transcriptional activity of HIF-1α in cells (Fig. 1j), indicating that this mutation causes a loss-of-function phenotype.

Homozygous Phd2 deletion cooperates with BRafV600E to induce melanoma in vivo

To further define the role of Phd2 in melanomagenesis in vivo, we generated Tyr::CreER; Phd2lox/lox mice. The topical administration of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) to either fur-bearing or glabrous skin did not lead to the appearance of any pigmented lesions over 18 months (Supplementary Fig. 3a). In contrast, the topical administration of 4-OHT to either fur-bearing or glabrous skin led to the development of nevi with the appearance of pigmented patches (melanocytic nevi) in the Tyr::CreER; BRafCA compound transgenic mouse strain (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Nevertheless, none of nevi progressed to primary melanoma after 1.5 years, which is consistent with a previous report25. Thus, our data indicate that Phd2 deletion alone is not sufficient to induce melanocytic hyperplasia.

Because activation of the Akt–mTOR oncogenic signaling is required for BRAFV600E-induced melanomagenesis26, we further studied whether the cooperation of PHD2 deletion and BRAFV600E is sufficient to trigger melanoma formation. To this end, we generated Tyr::CreER; BrafCA; Phd2lox/lox compound mice. After performing PCR to confirm the genotype of these engineered mice (Supplementary Fig. 4a), we administered 4-OHT topically on the ear, flank and tail of Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/lox mice at 6 weeks of age (Fig. 2a). After 40 days, there was little gross pigmentation in the areas (ear and flank) where 4-OHT was administered (Fig. 2b, e). However, the histologic analysis showed an increase in the number of solitary melanocytes in the dermis (Fig. 2h). Flat pigmented lesions began to appear 80 days after the administration of 4-OHT (Fig. 2c, f) which continued to grow and formed tumor nodules after another 40 days (Fig. 2d, g). Histologically, there were increasing numbers of pigmented tumor cells in the dermis, forming small dermal aggregates (Fig. 2i) to expansile nodules (Fig. 2j). After 4–5 months, fully developed melanoma occupied the entire dermis and subcutis (Fig. 2k). Mouse melanoma cells showed enlarged nuclei and contained nucleoli (Fig. 2l) which exhibited features consistent with those of human melanoma cells.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Phd2 loss cooperates with BRafV600E to induce malignant melanoma in mice. a Treatment scheme. Mice carrying various conditional alleles of BRaf (BRafCA) and/or Phd2 (Phd2lox/lox) were crossed to the Tyr::CreER mice with melanocyte-specific expression of a hormone-dependent form of Cre recombinase (CreERT2). 4-OHT-dependent activation of the CreER recombinase leads to a melanocyte-specific conversion of BRafCABRafV600E and the conversion of the Phd2lox alleles to Phd2−/− alleles. bg Melanoma progression in mice. Tyr::CreER;BRafCA;Phd2lox/lox mice were treated topically with 4-OHT on the ear (bd) and flank (eg). 4-OHT-treated mice were killed at 40, 80 and 120 days after the induction. The pigmented lesions at flank and ear was photographed at days 40 (b, e), 80 (c, f), and 120 (d, g) following the 4-OHT induction. hm Histology of melanoma in mice. Mouse tissues were processed and histology was examined using hematoxylin and eosin stain. Increased pigmented cells in the dermis were present at day 40 (h) and pigmented cells formed small tumor nodules in the dermis at day 80 (i). At day 120, melanoma cells formed bigger tumor nodules (j, k). Cytologically, these tumor cells were focally pigmented and had enlarged nuclei, a morphology that is similar to human melanoma (l). Tumor cells were stained positive for the S100 antibody (m). Bars in bg indicate 5 mm. Bars in hj indicate 200 μm. Bar in k indicates 400 μm. Bars in l, m indicate 50 μm

Pagetoid proliferation of melanocytes is a histological hallmark for human melanoma27. Examination of the epidermis from induced mice revealed pagetoid proliferation of melanocytes (Supplementary Fig. 4b). Some of mouse melanoma cells were heavily pigmented and tumor cells were diffusely positive for S100 (Fig. 2m), confirming their melanocytic lineage. The deletion of Phd2 in mouse melanoma tissues was also confirmed by PCR (Supplementary Fig. 4c). Notably, 100% of the Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/lox mice developed melanoma upon the administration of 4-OHT, whereas none of mice treated with vehicle control developed melanoma (Supplementary Fig. 3c).

The life span of Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/lox mice was significantly shorter than that of Tyr::CreER; BRafCA or Tyr::CreER; Phd2lox/lox mice (Fig. 3a). Interestingly, when 4-OHT was administered in Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/lox mice during the neonatal period (the first 3 days after the birth), the initiation of melanoma occurred earlier than that in adult mice. All neonatal mice required killing within 95 days following the administration of 4-OHT (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Survival and lymph node metastasis in Tyr::CreER;BRafV600E;Phd2−/− mice. a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of Tyr::CreER;BRafV600E (n = 20), Tyr::CreER;Phd2−/− (n = 20), Tyr::CreER;BRafV600E;Phd2−/− postnatal mice (n = 20) and Tyr::CreER;BRafV600E;Phd2−/− adult mice (6 weeks, n = 20) after 4-OHT induction. Log rank tests of survival plots of the data indicated a statistically significant difference between the following survival curves: Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; versus Tyr::CreER;BRafV600E;Phd2−/− mice (p < 0.0001), and Tyr::CreER;BRafV600E;Phd2−/− adult versus Tyr::CreER;BRafV600E;Phd2−/− postnatal mice (p < 0.0001). bd Lymph node metastasis in Tyr::CreER;BRafV600E;Phd2−/− mice. A positive lymph node was present near the area with melanoma induction (arrow points to the lymph node, b). The lymph node was enlarged with pigmented cells (c) and high-power view showed melanoma cells in the lymph node (arrows point to the tumor cells, d). e Percentage of mice that developed lymph node metastasis. Bar in c indicates 200 μm. Bar in d indicates 50 μm. Bar in b indicates 3 mm. *p < 0.05 compared to Tyr::CreER;BrafV600E;Phd2−/− group using one-way ANOVA with pairwise comparisons

Upon necropsy, we found that grossly positive lymph nodes were common in Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2−/− mice (Fig. 3b). The histologic examination further confirmed the presence of metastatic melanoma cells in lymph nodes (Fig. 3c, d). Notably, 40% of adult Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2−/− mice developed lymph node metastasis, whereas 60% of mice developed lymph node metastasis when 4-OHT was administered during the neonatal period (Fig. 3e). Nevertheless, we did not observe any distant organ metastasis (lung, liver, spleen and heart) in these mice. Therefore, our data demonstrate that the cooperation of homozygous Phd2 deletion with oncogenic BRAF leads to the development of primary cutaneous melanoma with lymph node metastatic capacity in mice.

Haplo-deficient Phd2 induces melanoma with longer latency in vivo

It has been shown that Phd2 haplo-deficient (Phd2+/−) mice have an enhanced angiogenic response to ischemia and that the combined loss of Phd2 in stromal and cancer cells sensitize tumors to chemotherapy28. Hence, we attempted to address whether Phd2 haplo-deficiency in melanocytes is still capable of cooperating with oncogenic BRAF to induce melanoma in our experimental setting. After genotyping Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/+ mice (Supplementary Fig. 4a), we topically treated 6-week-old mice on the ear, flank and tail with 4-OHT. The presence of pigmented lesions was assessed at 45 (Fig. 4a), 90 (Fig. 4b), 135 (Fig. 4c) and 180 (Fig. 4d) days following the 4-OHT administration. Pigmented tumor did arise but the latency of appearance of pigmented lesions was relatively longer than that in Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2−/− mice. Histologically, there were increasing numbers of individual pigmented tumor cells in the dermis, forming small dermal aggregates (Fig. 4e) to expansile nodules (Fig. 4f, g). After 6 months, fully developed melanoma occupied the entire dermis (Fig. 4h).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Haplo-deficient Phd2 is sufficient to cooperate with BRafV600E to induce melanoma in mice. ah Haplo-deficient Phd2 is sufficient to cooperate with BRAFV600E to induce melanoma in mice. The 6-week old adult Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/+ mice were treated topically on the ear, flank and tail with 4-OHT. The presence of pigmented lesions was assessed at days 45 (a), 90 (b), 135 (c) and 180 (d) following 4-OHT administration. 4-OHT-treated mice were killed at 45, 90 and 180 days after the induction. The pigmented lesions were photographed at day 45 (e), 90 (f) and 180 (g, h) following the 4-OHT induction. i Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2-/+ neonatal mice (n = 20) and Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2-/+ (n = 20) adult mice (6 weeks to 1 year old). j Comparison of tumor volume in mice with homozygous deletion of Phd2 or haplo-deficient Phd2 mice. Tumor volume in Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2-/+ (n = 20) mice was significantly smaller than that of Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2−/− mice (p = 0.00171). k Melanoma shown on uninduced part of body (%) in homozygous deletion or haplo-deficient Phd2 mice. Melanoma present at uninduced body part was quantified (n = 20 in each group). l Average number of positive lymph nodes in homozygous deletion or haplo-deficient Phd2 mice (n = 20 in each group). m, n CD31 immunohistochemical stain in in homozygous deletion or haplo-deficient Phd2 mice (n = 5 in each group). Bars in ad indicate 1 mm. Bars in eh, m, n indicate 100 μm. Arrows in m, n point to CD31+ blood vessels. *p < 0.05 (t-test) compared to Brafv600E;Phd2−/− group in j and l; error bars indicate s.d.

When 4-OHT was administered during the neonatal period (the first 3 days after the birth), melanoma was induced in Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/+ mice earlier than that in adult mice as all mice required killing within 570 days following the administration of 4-OHT (Fig. 4i). After 4-OHT administration, 100% of the Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/+ mice eventually developed melanoma. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/+ mice survived significantly longer than those Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/lox mice after the 4-OHT administration (Fig. 4i). Moreover, tumor volumes in Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/+ mice were significantly smaller than that of Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/lox mice after the administration of 4-OHT (Fig. 4j). 20% of Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2−/− mice developed tumor outside the area treated with 4-OHT, while none of the Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2-/+ mice developed tumor outside the area treated with 4-OHT (Fig. 4k). An average of 3.5 positive lymph nodes were identified in Phd2−/− mice, while few positive lymph nodes were seen in PHD2/+ mice (Fig. 4l). There were more CD31-positive blood vessels in Phd2−/− tumors (Fig. 4m) than that in the Phd2/+ melanomas (Fig. 4n). Taken together, our data indicate that while the effect of haplo-deficient Phd2 is weaker than that of biallelic deletion of Phd2, it is still sufficient to cooperate with mutant BRAF to induce melanoma.

Phd2 deletion increases HIF target expression and glucose uptake

To elucidate mechanisms underlying melanomagenesis in Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E; Phd2−/− mice, we first studied gene expression in haplo-deficient and homozygous Phd2-depleted mouse tumor tissues in comparison to that in Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Pten−/− mice by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). We found that melanomas with haplo-deficient Phd2 expressed significantly less Phd2 than that in Phd2 wild-type mice. The tumors with homozygous deletion of Phd2 expressed even less Phd2 and the residual Phd2 expression was probably due to normal stromal tissue residing within the melanomas (Fig. 5a). Phd2 target genes were significantly elevated in melanomas with haplo-deficient Phd2 and more so in tumors with homozygous deletion of Phd2 (Fig. 5a). Western blot analysis of melanoma tissues showed increased HIF-1α, carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) in melanomas with haplo-deficient Phd2 and even more pronounced increase in homozygous deletion of Phd2 compared with tumor tissues from Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E; Pten−/− mice (Fig. 5b). Melanoma with haplo-deficient Phd2 deletion showed less pAkt level than that of melanoma with Pten deletion (Fig. 5b). We then established a melanoma cell line (BrafV600E; Phd2−/−) from the tumors that developed in Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E; Phd2−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). We used 2-NBDG, a fluorescent tracer, to monitor glucose uptake into living cells. The results showed that BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells had significantly more glucose uptake than that of BrafV600E; Pten−/− melanoma cells (Fig. 5c). Increased glucose uptake in BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells was significantly inhibited by FM19G11 treatment, a HIF inhibitor (Fig. 5d) or HIF-1α knockdown (Fig. 5e), which is accompanied by concomitant decreased Glut1 expression (Supplementary Fig. 6).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Phd2 deletion induced HIF target and glucose uptake changes. a Phd2 regulated gene expression in mouse melanomas. Quantitative RT-PCR assay for Phd2, CAIX, VEGFA, GLUT1, PGK, PGM and LDHA mRNA expression in Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2−/− mice melanoma tissues (n = 3 replicate experiments; *p < 0.01 compared with Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2−/+ or Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Pten−/− mouse melanoma tissues). β-Actin is used as loading control. b Phd2 regulated protein expression in mouse melanomas. Expression of Phd2, HIF-1α, VEGFA, pAkt and Akt protein was determined by western blot analysis in Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2−/−, Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2-/+ and Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Pten−/− mouse melanoma tissues (n = 3 replicate experiments). β-Actin was used as a loading control. c Uptake of a fluorescent deoxyglucose analog (2-NBDG) is increased in Phd2−/− mouse melanoma cells. The 2-NBDG uptake assay was performed using BRafV600E; Phd2−/− or BRafV600E; Pten−/− mouse melanoma cells (left panel) (n = 3 replicate experiments). Quantity of 2-NBDG uptake is assessed in these mice (right panel) (n = 3 replicate experiments, *p < 0.05). d HIF inhibition reverses Phd2 deletion-induced glucose uptake increase. 2-NBDG uptake is assessed in FM19G11-treated BRafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells (n = 3 replicate experiments, *p < 0.05 compared with control group). e Knockdown of HIF-1α reverses Phd2 deletion-induced glucose uptake increase. 2-NBDG uptake is assessed in BRafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma with HIF-1α knockdown (n = 3 replicate experiments, *p < 0.05 compared with control group). One way ANOVA or t-test was used for statistical analysis and error bars indicate s.d.

Phd2 deletion leads to Akt–mTOR pathway activation

We isolated proteins from melanocytic nevi derived from Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E mice and melanomas derived from Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E; Phd2−/− mice and profiled expression of 291 signaling transduction proteins using the reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA). The analyses of RPPA data identified 20 proteins that were significantly up-regulated in mouse melanomas compared to nevi (Fig. 6a). Of note, 4 of them were phospho-AKTS473, phospho-S6S235/236, Phospho-ShcY317 and phospho-SrcY416. Our western blot showed elevated expression of phospho-AKTS473, phospho-S6KT389 and phospho-4EBP1S65 in mouse melanomas compared to nevi (Fig. 6b). We performed immunohistochemical stains and showed that the melanoma cells were positive for phospho-4EBP1 and phospho-S6K (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Phd2 deletion leads to activation of the Akt–mTOR pathway. a RPPA analysis of tumors with homozygous deletion of Phd2. Tumor tissues from Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2−/− or Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E mice were processed and analyzed by RPPA assays. The analyses identified proteins that were significantly changed in mouse melanomas compared to nevi. b Activation of Akt–mTOR pathway after phd2 deletion. Tumor tissues were processed and western blots showed stabilization of HIF-1α and HIF-2α proteins after Phd2 depletion. Increased phosphorylation of Akt, 4EBP1 and S6K was observed in tumors from Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2−/− compared with those of Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E mice. c Re-expression of Phd2 inhibits the Akt–mTOR pathway. A BRafV600E; Phd2−/− mouse melanoma cell line was established from melanomas in Tyr::CreER; BRafCA; Phd2lox/lox mice. Phd2 was ectopically reintroduced in these tumor cells. Western blot analysis showed that degradation of HIF-1α and HIF-2α proteins with decreased expression of VEGFR2 decreased phosphorylation of Akt, 4EBP1 and S6K. d Pharmacological inhibition (FM19G11) of HIF pathway in BRafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells. A similar but more pronounced inhibition of the Akt–mTOR pathway was observed using the HIF inhibitor. β-Actin was used as a loading control. Results are representative of three independent experiments

To confirm a causal relationship between the loss of Phd2 and the elevation in Akt pathway activity, we re-expressed Phd2 in the BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells and found that re-expression of Phd2 in these cells induced a significant decrease in HIF-1α and HIF-2α protein expression and a decrease in the phosphorylation of Akt and 4EBP1 compared to those of control (Fig. 6c). Notably, there was no significant change in the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 (ERK1/2). To further study whether HIF pathway is involved in the regulation of Akt pathway by Phd2 deletion, we treated BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells with FM19G11. The treatment led to a decrease in phosphorylation of Akt, 4EBP1 and S6K compared to those of cells treated with the vehicle control (Fig. 6d). In addition, we performed silencing HIF-1α and HIF-2α in the BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells and showed a decreased activation of Akt pathway (Supplementary Fig. 8a, b). We also treated the BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells under 1% oxygen and demonstrated that hypoxia further stabilized HIF-1α and HIF-2α expression with increased pAkt and pS6K levels (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Furthermore, we transfected the BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells with a non-degradable HIF-1α that also resulted in elevated pAkt and pS6K levels (Supplementary Fig 1b). Taken together, our data support that Phd2 deletion activates the Akt pathway in melanomas, in part, via HIFs.

Inhibition of mTOR pathway suppresses melanoma growth in vivo

Because the AKT–mTOR–S6 signaling axis was activated during melanomagenesis in Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E; Phd2−/− mice, we reasoned that rapamycin, which targets the mTORC1 kinase complex, may inhibit melanomagenesis induced in these engineered mice. Melanoma was induced in these mice and when tumors become palpable, we treated these mice with the vehicle control or rapamycin (1.5 mg/kg/day) for 8 weeks and then these mice were followed (Fig. 7a). Tumor growth was significantly inhibited by rapamycin treatment (Fig. 7b). In addition, administration of rapamycin prolonged the life span of Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E; Phd2−/− mice (median survival time = 375 days) compared to those mice treated with the vehicle control (median survival time = 275 days) (p = 0.0018) (Fig. 7c). Vehicle-treated mice developed large pigmented tumors (Fig. 7d). In some mice, the treatment with rapamycin induced the complete regression of mouse melanoma (Fig. 7g). Histologic analysis confirmed that significantly smaller cluster of tumor cells and aggregates of melanophages were localized to the dermis in Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E; Phd2−/− mice treated with rapamycin (Fig. 7h) compared to bulky tumors in the control group (Fig. 7e). In contrast to the mice treated with vehicle (Fig. 7f), lymph node metastasis was not seen in treated mice (Fig. 7i). In order to investigate the signaling pathways that are altered in Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E; Phd2−/− mice after treatment with rapamycin, we conducted RPPA assays using tissues collected before and after treatment. The analysis of RPPA data identified 21 proteins that were significantly downregulated by rapamycin. Many of the downregulated proteins are regulated by the Akt–mTOR–S6 signaling pathway, such as: phospho-RbS807/811, phospho-AKTS473, Cyclin B1, TFRC, phospho-S6S235/236, phospho-EGFRY1068, MEK1 and phospho-AKTT308 (Fig. 7j). Torin1 inhibitor is a potent inhibitor of mTORC1/229. It inhibited pAkt and pS6K levels in BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells (Fig. 7k), and inhibited the proliferation of BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7l). The proliferation of BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells was also significantly slowed down after silencing HIF-1α or HIF-2α (Supplementary Fig. 9a). However, silencing HIF-1α or HIF-2α added little additional inhibitory effect to torin1 treatment on the proliferation of BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells (Supplementary Fig. 9b). Taken together, our data further support that the activation of the Akt–mTOR–S6 signaling axis that occurs as a result of Phd2 deletion is crucial for melanoma cell proliferation.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Inhibition of mTOR pathway suppresses the growth of melanoma in vivo. a Scheme of rapamycin treatment. b Representative images of Tyr::CreER; BRafV600E; Phd2−/− mouse treated with the vehicle control (left panel) or rapamycin (right panel). Rapamycin treatment lasted for 8 weeks. Tumor masses are highlighted by red circles. c Kaplan–Meier survival curves of mice treated with vehicle control (n = 10) or rapamycin (n = 10) and p < 0.05. di Representative images of skin and lymph nodes in mice treated with the vehicle control or rapamycin. After killing the mice, underside of skin was exposed and photographed (d, g). The entire dermis was occupied by tumor cells (e) and lymph node was positive for melanoma in the vehicle-treated mice (f). On the contrary, there were significantly fewer tumor cells in the dermis (h) with negative lymph node (i) in the rapamycin-treated mice. j Inhibition of the Akt–mTOR pathway resulted in tumor growth suppression. Tumor tissues with or without rapamycin treatment were processed and analyzed using RPPA assays. Proteins with most significant changes were used to generate the heatmap. Notably, phospho-RbS807/811, phospho-AKTS473, Cyclin B1, TFRC, phospho-S6S235/236, phospho-EGFRY1068, MEK1 and phospho-AKTT308 proteins were significantly reduced in mice treated with rapamycin. k Torin1 inhibits Akt–mTOR pathway. BRafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells were treated with torin1 for 48 h. Western blot analysis was performed. Results are representative of three independent experiments. l Torin1 inhibits BRafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cell growth. The melanoma cells were treated with different concentrations of torin1 (Control, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μM) and different lengths of time (24 or 48 h). Results are summary of three independent experiments. Bars in b indicate 6 mm. Bars in d, g indicate 3 mm. Bars in e, f, h, i indicate 100 µm. *p < 0.05 compared to control (t-test); error bars indicate s.d.

Discussion

Our study is the first to demonstrate that PHD2 plays a crucial tumor suppressor role in the initiation of melanoma. Although the effect of haplo-deficiency of Phd2 in melanocytes is relatively weaker than that exhibited when biallelic deletion of Phd2 occurs, it is still sufficient to cooperate with oncogenic BRAF to induce melanoma. This observation suggests that the intact PHD2 signaling pathway is vital for its tumor suppressor role. Both mouse and human melanoma data support that the tumor suppression function of PHD2 is mediated through the AKT–mTOR pathway.

The tumor suppressor function of PHD2 is supported by several clinical and pathological studies which showed that the decrease in expression of PHD2 is associated with worse clinical outcomes3032. In this study, we also demonstrated a decreased expression of PHD2 during progression of nevi to melanomas, and analysis of the TCGA SKCM data revealed that lower expression of PHD2 is associated with worse clinical outcome. Our RPPA data reveal that Phd2 deletion in melanocytes leads to activation of the AKT–mTOR signaling pathway. Re-expression of Phd2 in Phd2−/− melanoma cells suppresses the Akt–mTOR pathway, further supporting the involvement of this pathway. The degree of Akt pathway activation in melanoma cells with Phd2 deletion is less than that in melanoma cells with Pten deletion, which may be one of the reasons that melanoma has a longer latency in Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E; Phd2−/− mice than that in the Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E; Pten−/− mice. Activation of Akt pathway is critical for Phd2−/− melanoma cell proliferation since suppression of this pathway using torin1 or rapamycin significantly inhibits BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cell growth in vitro and mouse melanomas in Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E; Phd2−/− mice and prolongs their lifespans, respectively. The activation of AKT pathway was also observed in immortalized human melanocytes after PHD2 knockdown and the phenotype can be rescued by reintroduction of PHD2. These results support that the tumor suppressor function of PHD2 is mediated at least in part through the AKT–mTOR pathway.

Phd2 deletion results in stabilization of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells. Our analysis of TCGA SKCM data discovers a novel PHD2-P317S mutation in melanoma and this mutation also resulted in deficiency of PHD2 interaction with HIF-1α in human melanocytes. HIF inhibitor or HIF-1α knockdown suppresses AKT–mTOR pathway in BrafV600E; Phd2−/− melanoma cells, supporting the involvement of HIF pathway activation in mediating the effect of Phd2 deletion, at least in melanoma setting. The AKT–mTOR and HIF pathways are closely intertwined33. AKT–mTOR regulates HIF-1α synthesis34 while HIF-1α has been shown to regulate Akt–mTOR signaling in cancer35. Another recent study showed that the conditional deletion of HIF-1α or HIF-2α in melanocytes failed to inhibit melanomagenesis in Tyr::CreER; BrafV600E; Pten−/− mice. However, HIF-1α or HIF-2α independently contributed to melanoma metastasis36. These results might not be unexpected since our data demonstrated that Phd2 deletion has a weaker effect on Akt pathway activation than that of Pten deletion in melanocytes. Deletion of HIF-1α or HIF-2α may be insufficient to overcome the strong tumor promoting effect of PTEN deletion. Our results support that HIF pathway is important for the tumor suppressor function of PHD2. Nevertheless, our recent study also showed that PHD2 can directly proline hydroxylate AKT on two major proline residues that can inactivate AKT37 and deleting PHD2 can activate AKT in a VHL-dependent manner. Thus, it is likely that PHD2 depletion can activate AKT in both HIF-independent and HIF-dependent pathways, in different cellular or tissue contexts.

In summary, our studies provide evidence that PHD2 functions as a tumor suppressor through suppression of the AKT–mTOR oncogenic pathway in melanoma. Increased HIF activity is associated with its enhancement of anaerobic metabolism, neoangiogenesis and aggressive growth of malignancies38,39. Since PHIs are been tested in multiple phase III clinical trials in anemic patients with chronic renal failure (ClinicalTrials.gov), the long-term effects of PHIs should be carefully observed in these treated patients for their possible effect on tumor growth. This is particularly important clinically since uremic patients are considered to be immunocompromised. That being said, we cannot exclude the possibility that there may be contributions to the tumor suppressor role of PHD2 that are independent of its catalytic activity17. If this were the case, it might mitigate concerns over potential pro-tumorigenic effects of PHIs. Future studies are warranted to address this critical issue in both melanoma and other human cancer settings.

Methods

Cell culture

WM115A, 1205Lu, 451Lu and WM3918 cells were kind gifts from Meenhard Herlyn (The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA). Melanoma cells were cultured under 37 °C humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and grown in MCDB153/L15 medium (4:1, v/v) supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum, insulin (5 units/mL), CaCl2 (2 mmol/L), 100 units/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin40. We used VenorTM GeM Mycoplasma Dection Kit, PCR-based (Catalog Number: MP0025) to rule out mycoplasma infection.

Melanoma tissue microarray and IHC staining

The melanocytic tumor progression tissue microarray (TMA) includes 130 cores from 35 nevi, 200 cores from 60 primary melanoma and 150 cores from 75 metastatic lesions41. Histological sections of the tissue array slide TMA sections were processed using an automated immunohistochemistry (IHC) platform (Benchmark, Ventana, Roche, Illkirch, France) and sections were stained with a polyclonal PHD2 antibody in a 1:100 dilution (Novus Biologicals; catalog number NB100-137).

PHD2 expression and patient survival

To study the possible relationship between PHD2 gene expression and survival, we first sorted the TCGA SKCM patient into PHD2-high and PHD2-low groups according to PHD2 mRNA expression levels (top 5% versus bottom 5%). Next we analyzed the difference in survival between these two groups using OncoLnc* (www.oncolnc.com).

Plasmids and reagent

pLenti-EglN1 mammalian expression plasmid, HIF-responsive element (HRE)-containing plasmid and lentiviral shRNA constructs targeting human EglN1, EglN2 and EglN3 were obtained from Dr. William G. Kaelin, Jr (Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed to generate various EglN1 mutants using the QuikChange XL Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, City) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. SH-HIF1a and SHI-HIF2a lenti plasmids were gifts from Dr. M. Celeste Simon (Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania). pCDNA3-HIF1a was constructed by Dr. Frank Lee. Deoxy-2-[(7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)amino]-d-glucose (catalog number 72987) was purchased from Sigma and Torin1 (catalog number S2827) from Selleckchem.

Transfection and infection

MEFs (ATCC), 293FT (ATCC) and 293T (ATCC) cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Pen/Strep). Immortal human melanocytes (hTERT/p53DD/Cdk4R24C/BRAFV600E (ATCC) (IHPM-VE) were cultured in glutamine containing Ham’s F12 media supplemented with 7% FBS, 0.1 mM IBMX, 50 ng/mL TPA, 1 µM Na3VO4 and 1 µM dbcAMP42. The 293FT packaging cell lines were used for the lentiviral production. Lentiviral infection was carried out as follows: post transfection with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), viruses were collected after 48 and 72 h43. After passing through 0.45 μM filters, appropriate amounts of viruses were used to infect target cells in the presence of 8 μg/mL polybrene. Following the lentiviral infection, cells were maintained in the presence of puromycin at 2 μg/mL for at least 72 h to eliminate any uninfected cells. All cells were maintained at 37 °C in 5% CO2.

Immunocytochemistry and immunoblotting

Expression of S100, p4EBP1, pS6K and CD31 was detected by immunocytochemistry using the commercially available anti-S100 (4C4.9, catalog number GTX24066, GeneTex Inc, Irvine, CA, USA), anti-p4EBP1 (catalog number 2855, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-pS6K (catalog number PA5-38307, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and anti-CD31(catalog number AF3628-SP, R&D). Cells or sections were stained with antibodies in a 1:100 dilution. The EBC buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 120 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP40, 0.1 mM EDTA and 10% Glycerol) supplemented with the complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Biosciences) was used to extract the whole cell lysates.

Anti-VEGF-A (AB1876-I, Millipore Sigma), anti-VEGFR2 (Ab-1059, catalog number 21531-1, Signalway Antibody), anti-CAIX (catalog number 11071-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-REDD1 (catalog number ABC245, EMD Millipore), anti-alpha Tubulin (ab4074, Abcam), anti-IRS1 (ab5603, Abcam), anti-pIRS1Ser307 (catalog number 2381s), anti-TSC2 (catalog number 3612), anti-pTSC2Ser1387 (catalog number 5584s), anti-p-4EBP1-S65 (catalog number 9451S), anti-4EBP1 (catalog number 9452S), anti-S6K (catalog number 9202), anti-p-Erk1/2 (catalog number 4370S), anti-Erk1/2 (catalog number 4695S), anti-pT308-Akt (catalog number 13038S), anti-pS473-Akt (catalog number 4060S), anti-Akt (catalog number 4685), anti-pT389-S6K (catalog number 9205S), anti-LC3 (catalog number 2775) and anti-EglN1 (catalog number 4835) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Anti-HIF2α (H1alpha67, catalog number NB100-105), anti-HIF2α (catalog number NB100-132 Lot13), anti-EglN2 (catalog number NB 100-310SS) and anti-EglN3 antibodies (catalog number NB 100-139SS) were purchased from Novus Biological. Anti-FLAG (A2220), anti-β-actin (A1978) and anti-vinculin (V9131) were obtained from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, Cream Ridge, NJ, USA). Antibodies are diluted 1:1000 for western blot. Full immunoblots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 10.

Peptide binding assays

HIF1α peptides were a gift from Dr. Qing Zhang (UNC Chapel Hill, City, USA) and were synthesized at The W.M. Keck Biotechnology Resource Center at Yale University. They were synthesized at 25 μM scale, with the N-terminus biotinylated and the C-terminal end remaining free. The sequences are listed as: 556-575 DLDLEMLAPYIPMDDDFQLR. For peptide binding assays, 1 μg of peptides was incubated at 4 °C for 4 h with 1000 μg of whole cell extracts recovered from the addition of EBC buffer to 293T cells transfected with FLAG-EglN1 WT or FLAG-EglN1 P317S or P317R. Then, 10 µl of streptavidin agarose beads was added and the mixture was incubated for another 1 h. Then, the beads were washed 5 times with NETN buffer (100 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.5 mM EDTA and 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet P-40). The bound proteins were eluted after being boiled in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer, resolved by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by immunoblot analysis.

Luciferase reporter assays

The 293T cells were transiently transfected with HRE plasmids and/or HIF-1α combined with or without different EglN1 mutants. After 36 h of transfection, cells were harvested and luciferase activities were measured by a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Transgenic mouse generation and genotyping

All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the University of Pennsylvania in compliance with Animal Welfare Assurance. The Phd2lox/lox mouse line was generated as previously described44. Genomic DNA was isolated from mouse tails45. Braf CA,Tyr::CreER and Phd2lox was genotyped as follows: Cre-mediated conversion of BrafCA to BrafV600E was determined by standard PCR of tail DNA with primer pair AD (AD FwdA1, 5’-TGAGTATTTTTGTGGCAACTGC-3’; and AD RevB1, 5’-CTCTGCTGGGAAAGCGGC-3’) to produce diagnostic PCR products of 185 bp, 308 bp and 335 bp for BRaf, BRaf CA and the BRaf VE alleles, respectively46,47. Reaction conditions were as follows: 92 oC, 2 min, 1 cycle; 92 oC, 30 s, 60 oC, 30 s, 72 oC, 45 s, 34 cycles; 72 oC, 3 min, 1 cycle. For the Phd2 floxed allele (PCR product = 0.73 kb for wild-type allele, 0.84 kb for floxed allele): PHD2Rec55 primer = 5’-AGG GCT TCT GGC ATT AGT TGA CC-3’ and Pex2-2 3’ primer = 5’-ACA TGT CAC GCA TCT TCC ATC TCC-3’. For the Phd2 knockout allele (PCR product = 0.56 kb): Pint1 Sal 5’ primer = 5’-AAT GGC TTG GGA CAA CTC-3’ and Pint2-3 3’ primer = 5’-GGA CAA CGT TTG GGA GTT GGT AAG-3’. Reaction conditions were as follows: 94 oC, 2 min, 1 cycle.; 94 oC, 30 s, 58 oC, 30 s, 72 oC, 50 s, 35 cycles; 72 oC, 2 min, 1 cycle. The administration of 4-OHT was conducted as previously described25.

Reverse phase protein array assays (RPPA)

Protein lysates including: (Lysis Buffer: 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 100 mM NaF, 10 mM Na pyrophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10% glycerol, containing freshly added protease and phosphatase inhibitors from Roche Applied Science catalog no. 05056489001 and 04906837001, respectively; 4× SDS Sample Buffer including: 40% glycerol, 8% SDS, 0.25 M Tris-HCL, pH 6.8). Before use sample buffer, add 2-mercaptoethanol (at 1 10 of the volume), then added to the lysis were extracted from frozen tumors and profiled by the RPPA platform at the MD Anderson Functional Proteomics Core facility as previously described48. A detailed description of the RPPA method, data normalization and the list of 291 antibodies are available at the core facility’s web page. Heatmaps were generated using Cluster and Tree View48. The p values for differences in protein expression between two treatment groups were determined by BRB-ArrayTools using a random variance model.

Establishment of mouse melanoma cell lines

Mouse melanoma tissue was washed with DMEM medium once and then minced in 5 mL of DMEM medium. Then, 500 µL of collagen (20 mg/mL) and 200 µL hyaluronidase (20 mg/mL) (catalog no. 070M7033, Sigma) were added and the tissue was digested at 37 oC for 30 min and subject to vortexing once every minute for 10 min. The medium was then filtered through a 40 μm nylon cell strainer and then spun down at 1500 RPM for 7 min. The cell pellet was then cultured in 10% FBS DMEM supplemented with Pen/Strep for 24 h and then in 5% FBS DMEM supplemented with Pen/Strep49. We sorted out the CD271-positive melanoma cells using the FACS Aria flow cytometer. The FACS analysis of sorted cells was performed using FloJo™ software.

Quantitative real-time PCR assay

Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy Kit (Qiagen) followed by complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis using SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). Quantitative PCR was performed using iQ SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) with specific primers listed as follows. cDNA corresponding to 1  μg RNA was added to the iQsyber green supermix and analyzed with icycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The thermal profiles were 95 °C for 30 s and 56 °C for 30 s. Melting curve analysis was done for each PCR reaction to confirm the specificity of amplification. At the end of each phase, florescence was measured and used for quantitative purpose9. The primers sequences are used as follows: PHD2 forward primer AGGCAACGGAACAGGCTATG, reverse primer CGCATCTTCCATCTCCATTTG; CAIX forward primer CGTGATTCTCGGCTACAACTGA, reverse primer CAATCGTTCGCCCATTCAA; VEGFA forward primer TGTCACCACCATGCCATCAT, reverse primer GACCCAAAGTGCTCCTCGAA; GLUT1 forward primer CGAGGGACAGCCGATGTG, reverse primer TGCCGACCCTCTTCTTTCAT; PGK forward primer GGAAGCGGGTCGTGATGA, reverse primer GCCTTGATCCTTTGGTTGTTTG; PGM forward primer GGTGTTCTGGGAAAGCAGCAGTTTGA, reverse primer TCGTTTGCTGAGAACTGCTTCCCCAC; LDHA forward primer AGGACTTGGCGGATGAGCTT, reverse primer CATCTCGCCCTTGAGTTT GTCT; β-actin forward primer GCTGACAGGATGCAGAAGGAG, reverse primer TCAAAGAAAGGGTGTAAAACGC.

2-NBDG uptake assay

Cells were plated at 5 × 104/well in 6-well plates and used at subconfluence after 24 h of preincubation Experiments were performed within 48 h50. For experiments, all culture medium were removed from each well and replaced with 2 mL of culture medium with or without fluorescent 2-NBDG. Plates were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 20 min before doing confocal microscopy.

Rapamycin treatment in vivo

Rapamycin (catalog number NC9362949, LC Laboratories) was dissolved in ethanol at a concentration of 20 mg/mL, filter sterilized and then resuspended in vehicle (0.25% PEG, 0.25% Tween-80) at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. Rapamycin at 1.5 mg/kg was injected51,52 intraperitoneally daily for 8 weeks. The vehicle was used as the control.

Cell proliferation assay

Cell proliferation assay was performed using the Cell Proliferation Kit I (catalog number 11465007001, Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions53, The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated from dose–response curves using Graphpad Prism 5. BrafV600Ephd2−/− cells or BrafV600Ephd2−/− with HIF knockdown cells were treated with torin1 (0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 µM).

Statistical analysis

All quantitative data were presented as the mean ± SD and at least three independent experiments were performed. Data were analyzed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. Nonparametric data were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. Data with a normal distribution were analyzed by Student’s test. Statistical significance was determined if two-sided p < 0.05.

Electronic supplementary material

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the NIH grants P01CA114046, P50CA174523, P01CA025874, P01CA210944, P30 CA010815 and R01-DK567611 and by the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation and the Melanoma Research Foundation.

Author contributions

X.X. and F.S.L. established collaboration for the exchange of relevant mouse strains to enable the generation and analysis of Tyr::CreER; BrafCA; Phd2lox mice. H.K. and D.S. generated and maintained the Phd2lox/lox mice. S.L., X.L., K.Z., L.D., H.C., C.Fen. and S.K. performed all of the mouse experiments. G.Z., M.H., Y.L., G.M., J.Z., W.X., Z.W. and S.L. prepared all the samples for RPPA and analyzed all the results. Representative figures were selected for publication by X.X., F.S.L. and W.W., and were prepared for publication by X.X., F.S.L., A.W., W.W. and S.L. S.L., J.L., J.G., X.D., D.S., R.X.L., J.N., J.L., X.C., Y.G., L.S. and H.K performed analysis of AKT–mTOR pathway. K.P. helped with hypoxia experiment. R.Y. did the cell sorting work. B.E. and C.Fel. did CD31 staining. X.X., F.S.L., W.W., J.S.M., L.Z., W.G., G.Z. and S.L. wrote the manuscript.

Data availability

The TCGA data referenced during the study are available in a public repository from the OncoLnc website (http://www.oncolnc.org/). All the other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

3/11/2019

The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Brett L. Ecker, which was incorrectly given as Brett Ecker. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

Contributor Information

Frank S. Lee, Email: franklee@pennmedicine.upenn.edu

Xiaowei Xu, Email: xug@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-07126-9.

References

  • 1.Kaelin WG, Jr, Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol. Cell. 2008;30:393–402. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Semenza GL. Life with oxygen. Science. 2007;318:62–64. doi: 10.1126/science.1147949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Majmundar AJ, Wong WJ, Simon MC. Hypoxia-inducible factors and the response to hypoxic stress. Mol. Cell. 2010;40:294–309. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Appelhoff RJ, et al. Differential function of the prolyl hydroxylases PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3 in the regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:38458–38465. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406026200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schofield CJ, Ratcliffe PJ. Signalling hypoxia by HIF hydroxylases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;338:617–626. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hirsila M, Koivunen P, Gunzler V, Kivirikko KI, Myllyharju J. Characterization of the human prolyl 4-hydroxylases that modify the hypoxia-inducible factor. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:30772–30780. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M304982200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mazzone M, et al. Heterozygous deficiency of PHD2 restores tumor oxygenation and inhibits metastasis via endothelial normalization. Cell. 2009;136:839–851. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bedogni B, Powell MB. Hypoxia, melanocytes and melanoma - survival and tumor development in the permissive microenvironment of the skin. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2009;22:166–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2009.00553.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liu S, Kumar SM, Martin JS, Yang R, Xu X. Snail1 mediates hypoxia-induced melanoma progression. Am. J. Pathol. 2011;179:3020–3031. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.08.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huang J, Zhao Q, Mooney SM, Lee FS. Sequence determinants in hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha for hydroxylation by the prolyl hydroxylases PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:39792–39800. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206955200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee KA, et al. The biphasic role of the hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-4-hydroxylase, PHD2, in modulating tumor-forming potential. Mol. Cancer Res. 2008;6:829–842. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-2113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ladroue C, et al. PHD2 mutation and congenital erythrocytosis with paraganglioma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;359:2685–2692. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Percy MJ, et al. A novel erythrocytosis-associated PHD2 mutation suggests the location of a HIF binding groove. Blood. 2007;110:2193–2196. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-04-084434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gardie B, et al. The role of PHD2 mutations in the pathogenesis of erythrocytosis. Hypoxia (Auckl.) 2014;2:71–90. doi: 10.2147/HP.S54455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wottawa M, et al. Knockdown of prolyl-4-hydroxylase domain 2 inhibits tumor growth of human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells by affecting TGF-beta1 processing. Int. J. Cancer. 2013;132:2787–2798. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kuchnio A, et al. The cancer cell oxygen sensor PHD2 promotes metastasis via activation of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cell Rep. 2015;12:992–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chan DA, et al. Tumor vasculature is regulated by PHD2-mediated angiogenesis and bone marrow-derived cell recruitment. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:527–538. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Su Y, et al. Prolyl hydroxylase-2 (PHD2) exerts tumor-suppressive activity in pancreatic cancer. Cancer. 2012;118:960–972. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hsieh MM, et al. HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibition results in endogenous erythropoietin induction, erythrocytosis, and modest fetal hemoglobin expression in rhesus macaques. Blood. 2007;110:2140–2147. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-073254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haase VH. Hypoxic regulation of erythropoiesis and iron metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2010;299:F1–F13. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00174.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gupta N, Wish JB. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors: a potential new treatment for anemia in patients With CKD. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2017;69:815–826. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nazarian RM, Prieto VG, Elder DE, Duncan LM. Melanoma biomarker expression in melanocytic tumor progression: a tissue microarray study. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2010;37(Suppl 1):41–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2010.01505.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Karbowniczek M, Spittle CS, Morrison T, Wu H, Henske EP. mTOR is activated in the majority of malignant melanomas. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2008;128:980–987. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5701074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Percy MJ, et al. A family with erythrocytosis establishes a role for prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 2 in oxygen homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:654–659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508423103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dankort D, et al. Braf(V600E) cooperates with Pten loss to induce metastatic melanoma. Nat. Genet. 2009;41:544–552. doi: 10.1038/ng.356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Damsky W, et al. mTORC1 activation blocks BrafV600E-induced growth arrest but is insufficient for melanoma formation. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:41–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Magro CM, Crowson AN, Mihm MC. Unusual variants of malignant melanoma. Mod. Pathol. 2006;19(Suppl. 2):S41–S70. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Leite de Oliveira R, et al. Gene-targeting of Phd2 improves tumor response to chemotherapy and prevents side-toxicity. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:263–277. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang RC, et al. Akt-mediated regulation of autophagy and tumorigenesis through Beclin 1 phosphorylation. Science. 2012;338:956–959. doi: 10.1126/science.1225967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang JH, et al. Analysis of HIF-1a and its regulator, PHD2, in retroperitoneal sarcomas: clinico-pathologic implications. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010;9:303–311. doi: 10.4161/cbt.9.4.10744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bordoli MR, et al. Prolyl-4-hydroxylase PHD2- and hypoxia-inducible factor 2-dependent regulation of amphiregulin contributes to breast tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2011;30:548–560. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.An X, et al. Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha, vascular endothelial growth factor and prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 2 in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and precursor lesions and their relationship with histological stages and clinical features. J. Dermatol. 2014;41:76–83. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.12314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kroemer G, Pouyssegur J. Tumor cell metabolism: cancer’s Achilles’ heel. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:472–482. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mottet D, et al. Regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha protein level during hypoxic conditions by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/glycogen synthase kinase 3beta pathway in HepG2 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:31277–31285. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300763200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Marhold M, et al. HIF1alpha regulates mTOR signaling and viability of prostate cancer stem cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 2015;13:556–564. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0153-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hanna SC, et al. HIF1alpha and HIF2alpha independently activate SRC to promote melanoma metastases. J. Clin. Invest. 2013;123:2078–2093. doi: 10.1172/JCI66715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Guo J, et al. pVHL suppresses kinase activity of Akt in a proline-hydroxylation-dependent manner. Science. 2016;353:929–932. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Semenza GL. Oxygen sensing, homeostasis, and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:537–547. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1011165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing and hypoxia signalling pathways in animals: the implications of physiology for cancer. J. Physiol. 2013;591:2027–2042. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.251470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kumar SM, et al. Mutant V600E BRAF increases hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha expression in melanoma. Cancer Res. 2007;67:3177–3184. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Schatton T, et al. Identification of cells initiating human melanomas. Nature. 2008;451:345–349. doi: 10.1038/nature06489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cao J, et al. MC1R is a potent regulator of PTEN after UV exposure in melanocytes. Mol. Cell. 2013;51:409–422. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Boehm JS, Hession MT, Bulmer SE, Hahn WC. Transformation of human and murine fibroblasts without viral oncoproteins. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;25:6464–6474. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.15.6464-6474.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Arsenault PR, et al. A knock-in mouse model of human PHD2 gene-associated erythrocytosis establishes a haploinsufficiency mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:33571–33584. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.482364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu S, et al. Norcantharidin induces melanoma cell apoptosis through activation of TR3 dependent pathway. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2011;12:1005–1014. doi: 10.4161/cbt.12.11.18380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dankort D, et al. A new mouse model to explore the initiation, progression, and therapy of BRAFV600E-induced lung tumors. Genes Dev. 2007;21:379–384. doi: 10.1101/gad.1516407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bosenberg M, et al. Characterization of melanocyte-specific inducible Cre recombinase transgenic mice. Genesis. 2006;44:262–267. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70. doi: 10.1038/nature11412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mitra A, Mishra L, Li S. Technologies for deriving primary tumor cells for use in personalized cancer therapy. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:347–354. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zou C, Wang Y, Shen Z. 2-NBDG as a fluorescent indicator for direct glucose uptake measurement. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods. 2005;64:207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jbbm.2005.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Guba M, et al. Rapamycin inhibits primary and metastatic tumor growth by antiangiogenesis: involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor. Nat. Med. 2002;8:128–135. doi: 10.1038/nm0202-128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Marin TM, et al. Rapamycin reverses hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a mouse model of LEOPARD syndrome-associated PTPN11 mutation. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:1026–1043. doi: 10.1172/JCI44972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lu H, et al. PAK signalling drives acquired drug resistance to MAPK inhibitors in BRAF-mutant melanomas. Nature. 2017;550:133–136. doi: 10.1038/nature24040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The TCGA data referenced during the study are available in a public repository from the OncoLnc website (http://www.oncolnc.org/). All the other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES