Abstract
The scattering strength of a random medium relies on the geometry and spatial distribution of its components as well as on their refractive index. Anisotropy can, therefore, play a major role in the optimization of the scattering efficiency in both biological and synthetic materials. In this study, we show that, by exploiting the coherent backscattering phenomenon, it is possible to characterize the optical anisotropy in Cyphochilus beetle scales without the need to change their orientation or their thickness. For this reason, such a static and easily accessible experimental approach is particularly suitable for the study of biological specimens. Moreover, estimation of the anisotropy in Cyphochilus beetle scales might provide inspiration for improving the scattering strength of artificial white materials.
Keywords: biological photonic structures, optics of natural materials, light scattering, anisotropic biological network, white materials
1. Introduction
An object is opaque white when the light incident on it undergoes multiple scattering events before exiting the medium, i.e. when the object is optically thick [1]. The optical thickness is defined as the ratio between the physical thickness of an object and the transport mean free path (ℓt), namely the distance that light travels before losing information about its starting propagation direction [2,3]. Commonly, ℓt is of the order of tens of micrometres in low-refractive-index white materials [4,5]. Therefore, opacity is only achieved for relatively large thicknesses (of the order of hundreds of micrometres) to allow a sufficient number of scattering events.
Nature, however, provides a different approach that can serve as an inspiration for the manufacturing of polymeric, thin but still opaque white materials [6–8]. In particular, the brilliant whiteness shown by the Cyphochilus beetle is known to be generated by multiple scattering of light inside the extremely thin scales (≃7 µm thick) that cover its exoskeleton (figure 1a,b) [4,9–12]. The beetle's intra-scale structure is composed of a nanostructured network of chitin filaments with a filling fraction of around 45% [13]. The chitin fibres inside the beetle scales are organized anisotropically, i.e. mainly oriented parallel to the surface of the scales (figure 1c). This structural anisotropy increases the scattering strength in the orthogonal direction to the scale surface, at the expense of the in-plane scattering, which is not as relevant for the total reflectance of the insect [12]. With such morphology and geometry, the beetle achieves high total reflectance (about 70% over the whole visible range) with a thin, lightweight and anisotropic network made of low-refractive-index material [4,12,13].
In recent years, a number of different techniques have been used to characterize anisotropic media; for example, spatially resolved reflectance [14,15], imaging diffuse transmission [12,16,17], spatio-temporal visualization of transmitted light [18] and coherent backscattering (CBS) [19–22]. As of yet, the accuracy in determining the in-plane and out-of-plane components of the light transport mean free path in Cyphochilus beetle scales has been limited by the strong thickness dependency of the experimental techniques used [4,12].
In this study, we showed that the CBS technique is well suited for studying the scattering properties of biological samples, allowing the anisotropy of a system to be estimated without the need to change its orientation or its thickness. Moreover, the CBS provides a precise evaluation of the in-plane transport mean free path without requiring samples with different thicknesses, in contrast with other static and easily accessible techniques. Our experimental results contribute to the understanding of scattering optimization in Cyphochilus beetle scales, providing a valuable guide for the development of novel sustainable materials by showing how to obtain a strong optical response while using a low-refractive-index biopolymer as a building block.
2. Results and discussion
To characterize light propagation in Cyphochilus scales, we performed a CBS experiment. We measured the angularly resolved light scattered by the sample around the backscattering direction, which shows a characteristic peak profile [23]. The CBS is the Fourier transform of the spatial distribution of light exiting the sample in the backscattering direction [3]. This phenomenon is often understood as an interference effect that originates from the superposition of a large number of two-wave interference patterns from reciprocal waves [23–27]. These waves have travelled the same optical path inside the medium but in opposite directions (figure 2a) and are therefore phase-related. The resulting CBS intensity distribution has a conical shape whose width provides a direct measurement of the light transport mean free path of the material [3].
The experimental set-up is shown in figure 2b. A collimated laser diode (peak wavelength of 635 nm, spot size of 2.5 mm and output power of 1.2 mW) was used as the light source. The scattered signal was focused, using a parabolic mirror, on a 100 µm core fibre connected to a spectrometer. The angular resolution of our set-up was ≃0.25 mrad. To acquire the CBS line shape, the speckle pattern, which occurs as a result of the high spatial coherence of the light source, needs to be averaged out [26]. This was done by placing the sample on a motorized rotation mount whose axis was the same as the propagation direction of the incoming laser beam. This averaging procedure precludes the possibility of investigating a potential in-plane, xy, anisotropy. However, it has recently been shown that the Cyphochilus scales are characterized by an isotropic spectral density in the xy-plane [13]. For this reason, our study focused only on the study of out-plane anisotropy.
The enhancement factor of the coherent signal, i.e. the ratio between the intensity at the exact backscattering angle and the incoherent background, strongly depends on the polarization. This is maximized when the single-scattered photons, which do not have a reciprocal counterpart and therefore contribute only to the incoherent background, are filtered out. This can be done by acquiring the CBS in the helicity-conserving (HC) channel (figure 2). The HC signal was then normalized to the one acquired in a linear non-conserving (LNC) configuration, as discussed in [28].
The measured CBS signal is reported in figure 3. The experimental data show a maximum lower than the theoretical value for semi-infinite media of 1 and a rounded top. This deviation is a consequence of the small thickness of the Cyphochilus scales and can be described by the isotropic theory for finite media [29]
2.1 |
where The parameters k, ℓt and b are the wavevector, the isotropic transport mean free path and the optical thickness, respectively. For semi-infinite media, i.e. b → ∞, equation (2.1) reduces to [29]
2.2 |
The reduction of the theoretical maximum in finite media is caused by the suppression of long light paths, which are responsible for the formation of the cusp of the CBS profile for semi-infinite media [2]. To accurately determine the transport mean free path, the effect of the internal reflections at the scale interface on the light path distribution inside the chitin network was accounted for in the extrapolation length, ze = (2/3)(1 + R)/(1 − R) [30–32]. R is the angle- and polarization-averaged reflection coefficient at the slab interface and can be obtained by an angular integration of the Fresnel coefficients [31,33]. These coefficients depend on the effective refractive index (ne) of the chitin network, which was estimated by the Maxwell–Garnett theory [34]. The expression of ze used in this study, and in the related literature regarding the study of the Cyphochilus beetle, is the one derived for isotropic systems. This approximation is justified by the absence of an analytical formula for the extrapolation length in anisotropic media [35].
Using a filling fraction of (45 ± 6)% [13], we calculated that ne = (1.22 ± 0.03), R = (0.32 ± 0.04) and ze = (1.29 ± 0.11). Finally, using the extrapolation length found from the expression above, we obtained ℓt = (1.40 ± 0.09) µm from the fit shown in figure 3.
In the literature, the isotropic theory has been used to obtain information about media in which the anisotropy is in the plane perpendicular (xy) to the incoming beam (z-direction) [19,22]. This type of anisotropy gives rise to a CBS cone whose line shape differs when acquired along the x- and y-directions [22]. It has recently been shown that the isotropic theory cannot be used to obtain quantitatively reliable information about the anisotropic light transport along perpendicular directions [35]. However, the anisotropy can be qualitatively estimated as the ratio between the widths of the CBS line shapes acquired along the x- and y-directions, which can be individually described by the isotropic theory [22]. Similarly, in the case of birefringent media as nematic liquid crystals, the isotropic theory can be used to describe the CBS line shapes originating from different polarization configurations [20].
In the case of the Cyphochilus beetle, the anisotropy is in the xz- and yz-plane (defining z as perpendicular to the surface of the scales) [12,13] and therefore the resulting CBS profile is isotropic (for light incoming along the z-direction). Owing to the particularly small thickness of the scales (≃7 µm), the probing direction of the incoming beam cannot be changed.
As the anisotropy cannot be investigated directly, to gain insight into the light transport inside the scales we performed anisotropic Monte Carlo simulations for scalar waves. A Monte Carlo technique is well suited for describing light propagation in disordered media, where the photon paths can be mathematically mapped into random walks [2,3,36]. Monte Carlo simulations have been extensively used both to investigate theoretical aspects of anisotropic diffusion [14,35,37–40] and to accurately describe experimental results regarding light propagation in anisotropic media [15,19,21].
Here, the photons paths in the white beetle scales were modelled by a series of random steps [41]. The anisotropy of the system was introduced via a direction-dependent step size, i.e. the components of the step vector were sampled from two different negative exponential distributions with mean ℓxy and ℓz for the in-plane and out-of-plane components, respectively. The angular component of each of the random steps was sampled from a distribution of points uniformly distributed on the surface of a unit sphere [42,43]. The collection of the initial and final positions of the walkers that escaped the material from the same face they entered it, which corresponds to reflected photons, was then used to reconstruct the CBS line shape [3,29]. The effect of residual absorption on the CBS line shape is not considered, owing to the negligible absorption of chitin in the visible [44]. The only parameters required for our Monte Carlo simulations are the distribution of the random steps, the thickness of the scales and the reflection coefficient at the scale interface (R). A schematic of the simulation parameters is illustrated in figure 4a.
Figure 4b,c shows how the CBS line shape is affected by changing both the in-plane (ℓxy) and out-of-plane (ℓz) components of the transport mean free path. In particular, ℓxy determines the width of the CBS profile, while the optical thickness, defined as OT = L/ℓz (where L is the thickness of the medium), specifies the enhancement of the coherent signal. These results can be qualitatively explained by the fact that the CBS depends only on the distance between the positions of the first scattering event (when the photon enters the medium) and the last (when the photon exits the medium). When a large number of photons is considered, these two positions have on average the same z-coordinate (which is of the order of ℓz), and therefore their distance can be considered to be z-independent. However, as discussed previously for the isotropic theory, when the optical thickness of the medium is small (i.e. when long light paths are not allowed by the finite thickness of the medium) the top of the CBS is rounded. The limited influence of the optical thickness on the width of the CBS line shape allows a precise value of ℓxy to be obtained without requiring samples with different thicknesses. By fitting the experimental data with the Monte Carlo simulations, it is possible to disentangle the contribution of ℓxy and ℓz to the CBS line shape. In particular, we obtained a value of ℓxy = (1.40 ± 0.09) µm and an optical thickness (OT) = (6.89 ± 0.13). The data were fitted by minimizing the χ2. The errors in ℓxy and OT were estimated by performing simulations in which the two parameters were gradually changed. This procedure was then repeated to take into account the uncertainty in the determination of the reflection coefficient (R).
The measured optical thickness is in good agreement with the total transmission data reported in the literature [4,12]. The total transmission (T) for slab geometry media in the diffusion approximation is
2.3 |
where L is the slab thickness. Equation (2.3) is the limit for negligible absorption of the expression derived in [45]. Using T = (0.29 ± 0.02), as reported in [4,12], and the extrapolation length previously calculated we obtained OTlit = (6.3 ± 1.2), which is consistent with what we measured.
From the measured OT and assuming L = (7 ± 1) µm, where L and its error represent the mean and 1 s.d. of the distribution reported in [12], we obtained ℓz = (1.02 ± 0.15) µm. The error in ℓz, which is mainly determined by the uncertainty in the thickness of the sample, can be affected by systematic errors given by surface roughness and curvature [3,46,47]. Comparing ℓz with ℓxy, the measured optical anisotropy (OA) is
2.4 |
Our experimental result is in agreement with the three-dimensional reconstruction of the chitin network reported in [13], which predicts .
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, we demonstrated that the transport mean free path and OA of light in the Cyphochilus beetle scales can be determined by measuring the CBS and that the results are in agreement with the one predicted in [13]. Exploiting the CBS effect provides a measurement of the OA which describes more accurately the scattering properties of the Cyphochilus beetle than the results reported in the literature. In addition, the experimental technique reported here allows the anisotropy of a system to be estimated without the need to change its orientation or its thickness, making the CBS a technique particularly suitable for the study of biological specimens.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
G.J. thanks A. Lopresti, S.R. Hinestrosa, L. Barberi and A. Caputo for the fruitful discussions and advice on numerical methods. G.J. and O.D.O thank Dr V.E. Johansen, R. Middleton, Dr G. Palermo and Dr G. Kamita for their assistance on experimental techniques.
Data accessibility
The raw data and the Monte Carlo code regarding the publication can be found in the electronic supplementary material.
Authors' contributions
G.J., O.D.O., A.D.L., R.S. and S.V. designed the experiments. G.J., J.B., R.S. and S.V. conceived and planned the simulations. G.J. carried out the experiments and the simulations. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis and manuscript.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
This study was supported by the European Research Council (ERC-2014-STG H2020 639088), the BBSRC David Phillips Fellowship (BB/K014617/1), the Leverhulme Trust's Philip Leverhulme Prize and the Leverhulme Trust (no. PG-2016-129), the EPSRC (grant nos. EPSRC EP/M027961), the Leverhulme Trust (grant no. RPG-2014-238), the Royal Society (grant nos. RG140457 and IE160502) and the Nanolase project (PRIN 2012).
References
- 1.Wiersma DS. 2013. Disordered photonics. Nat. Photonics 7, 188–196. ( 10.1038/nphoton.2013.29) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sheng P. 1995. Introduction to wave scattering, localization and mesoscopic phenomena. Berlin, Germany: Springer. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Akkermans E, Montambaux G. 2007. Mesoscopic physics of electrons and photons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burresi M, Cortese L, Pattelli L, Kolle M, Vukusic P, Wiersma DS, Steiner U, Vignolini S. 2014. Bright-white beetle scales optimise multiple scattering of light. Sci. Rep. 4, 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Caixeiro S, Peruzzo M, Onelli OD. 2017. Disordered cellulose-based nanostructures for enhanced light scattering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 7885–7890. ( 10.1021/acsami.6b15986) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Syurik J, Jacucci G, Onelli OD, Hölscher H, Vignolini S. 2018. Bio-inspired highly scattering networks via polymer phase separation. New York, NY: Wiley Online Library. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Syurik J, Siddique RH, Dollmann A, Gomard G, Schneider M, Worgull M, Wiegand G, Hölscher H. 2017. Bio-inspired, large scale, highly-scattering films for nanoparticle-alternative white surfaces. Sci. Rep. 7, srep46637 ( 10.1038/srep46637) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Toivonen MS, Onelli OD, Jacucci G, Lovikka V, Rojas OJ, Ikkala O, Vignolini S. 2018. Anomalous-diffusion-assisted brightness in white cellulose nanofibril membranes. Adv. Mater. 30, e1704050 ( 10.1002/adma.201704050) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vukusic P, Hallam B, Noyes J. 2007. Brilliant whiteness in ultrathin beetle scales. Science 315, 348 ( 10.1126/science.1134666) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Luke SM, Hallam BT, Vukusic P. 2010. Structural optimization for broadband scattering in several ultra-thin white beetle scales. Appl. Opt. 49, 4246–4254. ( 10.1364/AO.49.004246) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hallam BT, Hiorns AG, Vukusic P. 2009. Developing optical efficiency through optimized coating structure: biomimetic inspiration from white beetles. Appl. Opt. 48, 3243–3249. ( 10.1364/AO.48.003243) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cortese L, Pattelli L, Utel F, Vignolini S, Burresi M, Wiersma DS. 2015. Anisotropic light transport in white beetle scales. Adv. Opt. Mater. 3, 1337–1341. ( 10.1002/adom.201500173) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wilts BD, et al. 2018. Evolutionary-optimized photonic network structure in white beetle wing scales. Adv. Mater. 30, e1702057 ( 10.1002/adma.201702057) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kienle A, Forster FK, Hibst R. 2004. Anisotropy of light propagation in biological tissue. Opt. Lett. 29, 2617–2619. ( 10.1364/OL.29.002617) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kienle A, D'Andrea C, Foschum F, Taroni P, Pifferi A. 2008. Light propagation in dry and wet softwood. Opt. Express 16, 9895–9906. ( 10.1364/OE.16.009895) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Johnson PM, Faez S, Lagendijk A. 2008. Full characterization of anisotropic diffuse light. Opt. Express 16, 7435–7446. ( 10.1364/OE.16.007435) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lagendijk A, Johnson PM. 2009. Optical anisotropic diffusion: new model systems and theoretical modeling. J. Biomed. Opt. 14, 14–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pattelli L, Savo R, Burresi M, Wiersma DS. 2016. Spatio-temporal visualization of light transport in complex photonic structures. Light: Sci. Appl. 5, e16090 ( 10.1038/lsa.2016.90) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sapienza R, Mujumdar S, Cheung C, Yodh AG, Wiersma D. 2004. Anisotropic weak localization of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 033903-4 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.033903) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Muskens OL, Diedenhofen SL, Kaas BC, Algra RE, Bakkers EP, Gómez RJ, Lagendijk A. 2009. Large photonic strength of highly tunable resonant nanowire materials. Nano Lett. 9, 930–934. ( 10.1021/nl802580r) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Krauter P, Zoller C, Kienle A. 2018. Double anisotropic coherent backscattering of light. Opt. Lett. 43, 1702–1705. ( 10.1364/OL.43.001702) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bret BPJ, Lagendijk A. 2004. Anisotropic enhanced backscattering induced by anisotropic diffusion. Phys. Rev. E, 70, 036601 ( 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.036601) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Van Albada MP, Lagendijk A. 1985. Observation of weak localization of light in a random medium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2692–2695. ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2692) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wolf PE, Maret G. 1985. Weak localization and coherent backscattering of photons in disordered media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2696–2699. ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2696) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Akkermans E, Wolf PE, Maynard R. 1986. Coherent backscattering of light by disordered media: analysis of the peak line shape. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1471–1474. ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1471) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Etemad S, Thompson R, Andrejco MJ. 1986. Weak localization of photons: universal fluctuations and ensemble averaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 575–578. ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.575) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Akkermans E, Wolf PE, Maynard R. 1988. Theoretical study of the coherent backscattering of light by disordered media. J. Phys. 49, 77–98. ( 10.1051/jphys:0198800490107700) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Muskens OL, Lagendijk A. 2008. Broadband enhanced backscattering spectroscopy of strongly scattering media. Opt. Express 16, 1222–1231. ( 10.1364/OE.16.001222) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.van der Mark MB, van Albada MP, Lagendijk A. 1988. Light scattering in strongly scattering media: multiple scattering and weak localization. Phys. Rev. B 37, 3575–3592. ( 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.3575) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lagendijk A, Vreeker R, De Vries P. 1989. Influence of internal reflection on diffusive transport in strongly scattering media. Phys. Lett. A 136, 81–88. ( 10.1016/0375-9601(89)90683-X) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhu JX, Pine DJ, Weitz DA. 1991. Internal reflection of diffusive light in random media. Phys. Rev. A 44, 3948–3959. ( 10.1103/PhysRevA.44.3948) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Contini D, Martelli F, Zaccanti G. 1997. Photon migration through a turbid slab described by a model based on diffusion approximation. I. Theory. Appl. Opt. 36, 4587–4599. ( 10.1364/AO.36.004587) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Born M, Wolf E. 2013. Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Soukoulis CM, Datta S, Economou EN. 1994. Propagation of classical waves in random media. Phys. Rev. B 49, 3800 ( 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.3800) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Alerstam E. 2014. Anisotropic diffusive transport: connecting microscopic scattering and macroscopic transport properties. Phys. Rev. E 89, 063202 ( 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.063202) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ishimaru A. 1978. Wave propagation and scattering in random media, vols I and II London, UK: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Heino J, Arridge S, Sikora J, Somersalo E. 2003. Anisotropic effects in highly scattering media. Phys. Rev. E 68, 031908 ( 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.031908) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kienle A. 2007. Anisotropic light diffusion: an oxymoron? Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 218104 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.218104) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schäfer J, Kienle A. 2008. Scattering of light by multiple dielectric cylinders: comparison of radiative transfer and Maxwell theory. Opt. Lett. 33, 2413–2415. ( 10.1364/OL.33.002413) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kienle A, Foschum F, Hohmann A. 2013. Light propagation in structural anisotropic media in the steady-state and time domains. Phys. Med. Biol. 58, 6205–6223. ( 10.1088/0031-9155/58/17/6205) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kubo R, Toda M, Hashitsume N.. 1985. Statistical physics II: nonequilibrium statistical mechanics. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Weisstein EW. Sphere point picking. See http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SpherePointPicking.html.
- 43.Marsaglia G. 1972. Choosing a point from the surface of a sphere. Ann. Math. Stat. 43, 645–646. ( 10.1214/aoms/1177692644) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Leertouwer HL, Wilts BD, Stavenga DG. 2011. Refractive index and dispersion of butterfly chitin and bird keratin measured by polarizing interference microscopy. Opt. Express 19, 24 061–24 066. ( 10.1364/OE.19.024061) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Garcia N, Genack AZ, Lisyansky AA. 1992. Measurement of the transport mean free path of diffusing photons. Phys. Rev. B 46, 14 475–14 479. ( 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.14475) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Labeyrie G, Delande D, Müller CA, Miniatura C, Kaiser R. 2003. Coherent backscattering of light by an inhomogeneous cloud of cold atoms. Phys. Rev. A 67, 033814 ( 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.033814) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wilkowski D, et al. 2004. Coherent backscattering of light by resonant atomic dipole transitions. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 183–190. ( 10.1364/JOSAB.21.000183) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw data and the Monte Carlo code regarding the publication can be found in the electronic supplementary material.