Production of bioadsorbent from phosphoric acid pretreated palm kernel shell and coconut shell by two-stage continuous physical activation via N2 and air

Chuan Li Lee; Paik San H'ng; Md Tahir Paridah; Kit Ling Chin; Umer Rashid; Mariusz Maminski; Wen Ze Go; Raja Ahamd Raja Nazrin; Siti Nurul Asyikin Rosli; Pui San Khoo

doi:10.1098/rsos.180775

. 2018 Dec 19;5(12):180775. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180775

Production of bioadsorbent from phosphoric acid pretreated palm kernel shell and coconut shell by two-stage continuous physical activation via N₂ and air

Chuan Li Lee ¹, Paik San H'ng ^1,^2,^✉, Md Tahir Paridah ^1,², Kit Ling Chin ^1,^✉, Umer Rashid ³, Mariusz Maminski ⁴, Wen Ze Go ², Raja Ahamd Raja Nazrin ¹, Siti Nurul Asyikin Rosli ², Pui San Khoo ¹

PMCID: PMC6304154 PMID: 30662718

Abstract

In the present study, agricultural biomass—palm kernel shell (PKS) and coconut shell (CS)—was used to produce high porosity bioadsorbent using two-stage continuous physical activation method with different gas carrier (air and N₂) in each stage. The activation temperature was set constant at 600, 700, 800 or 900°C for both activation stages with the heating rate of 3°C min⁻¹. Two parameters, the gas carrier and activation temperature, were determined as the significant factors on the adsorption properties of bioadsorbent. BET, SEM, FTIR, TGA, CHNS/O and ash content were used to elucidate the developed bioadsorbent prepared from PKS and CS and its capacity towards the adsorption of methylene blue and iodine. The novel process of two-stage continuous physical activation method was able to expose mesopores and micropores that were previously covered/clogged in nature, and simultaneously create new pores. The synthesized bioadsorbents showed that the surface area (PKS: 456.47 m² g⁻¹, CS: 479.17 m² g⁻¹), pore size (PKS: 0.63 nm, CS: 0.62 nm) and pore volume (PKS: 0.13 cm³ g⁻¹, CS: 0.15 cm³ g⁻¹) were significantly higher than that of non-treated bioadsorbent. The surface morphology of the raw materials and synthesized bioadsorbent were accessed by SEM. Furthermore, the novel process meets the recent industrial adsorbent requirements such as low activation temperature, high fixed carbon content, high yield, high adsorption properties and high surface area, which are the key factors for large-scale production of bioadsorbent and its usage.

Keywords: bioadsorbent, two-stage continuous physical activation, palm kernel shell, coconut shell, H₃PO₄ pretreatment

1. Introduction

Used since the ancient times by Egyptians and Indians, activated carbon is a unique and versatile adsorbent to eliminate undesirable odour, taste, dyes, heavy metals and organic substances. In contemporary times, activated carbon has been extensively used by the chemical industries for removal, separation and preconcentration of both metallic and organic species from water and wastewater [1]. Today, coal-based activated carbon is the most prevalent adsorbent used; however, it is expensive and non-sustainable. This has led to a search for low-cost, easily available materials as alternative adsorbent materials.

Conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to high-efficiency bioadsorbent would boost its economic value, develop economical adsorbent materials and inspire diversion of the waste away from landfill and open burning. In Malaysia, enormous amounts of palm kernel shell (PKS) and coconut shell (CS) are still underused. Chiefly, both of this lignocellulosic biomass has the aptitude to be used as inexpensive adsorbents as it is not only an underused resource but practically at hand and sustainable resource [2,3]. Thence, the application of these inexpensive lignocellulosic biomass wastes as the carbon precursor through thermochemical conversion is very promising [4]. The adsorbent can present specific physico-chemical characteristics (i.e. surface area, porosity, pore-size distribution and surface functional groups) depending on the precursor and the method used in its preparation [5,6]. Industrially, cheap carbonaceous precursors with high carbon and low inorganic (i.e. ash) contents are preferred as raw material for the production of adsorbent [6]. High mineral (ash) content in agricultural biomass such as PKS and CS creates a significantly different challenge for preparing high-quality activated carbon. Currently, carbon from this high-ash agricultural biomass generated in thermochemical conversion has only been used as a soil amendment or low-grade fuel [7,8]; this inherently limits the market demand for this type of carbon. Ash leaching method with phosphoric acid prior to physical activation has been proven to remove a huge fraction of ash-forming elements in biomass and expose the mesopores of the carbon produced [9,10]. However, for high-ash agricultural biomass such as PKS and CS, the pores are majorly clogged by ash components such as silica or silicate derivatives, which are difficult to remove using the leaching method. To unclog the existing mesopores and create micropores, the biomass has to undergo further treatment, physical activation [11].

Physical activation using only nitrogen as the carrier gas to produce adsorbent has been carried out by many researchers [12–20]. Nitrogen is a small-scale molecule that can penetrate into narrow, smaller and deeper inside of particles to create micropores [21,22]. However, using nitrogen gas as carrier gas produced a very small surface area and enormous amount of ash, leading to inhibition of the activation especially on high-ash biomass due to the lack of open mesopores structure in the raw material itself [23]. While, using air as the carrier gas, it primitively modifies the bioadsorbent adsorptive affinity for organic compounds by opening up pores and introducing strong hydrogen bonding sites for ionizable compounds [11]. Thermal air activation of biomass can modify the pore size distribution and connectivity, and promote the oxygen functionality [11,24]. High-ash biomass might develop from this air activation as it may help open up pores that are clogged by major ash components such as silica or silicate derivatives and create the mesopores structure on the carbon produced. However, when air was present in activation process with high temperature and prolong period, the biomass might burn and cause the char yield to decrease [25].

Physical activation of high-ash biomass via air and N₂ help in creating different types of pores: mesopores and micropores, respectively. Thus, two-stage continuous physical activation was suggested in this study. Incorporating two-stage continuous physical activation via air and N₂ on phosphoric acid treated high-ash biomass will certainly increase the quality of the bioadsorbent produced. No similar work has been reported so far for bioadsorbent produced via two-step continuous physical activation with nitrogen and air as carrier gas which suggests a need for the present work. This study suggests that it is feasible to control the sequence of the gas and activation temperature by means of the experimental parameters. The phosphoric acid pretreated biomass was physically activated in two stages using air or N₂ as the gas carrier in each stage (Air > N₂ or N₂ > Air). The variations in properties of the bioadsorbent produced were analysed. One-stage physical activation using only N₂ or only air as the gas carrier was also conducted to create a comparison between one-stage and two-stage continuous physical activation of phosphoric acid treated PKS and CS. As a novelty, we include the significant difference in bioadsorbent characteristics of bioadsorbent prepared via one-stage and two-stage physical activation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the main effects of the suggested physical activation method (one-stage physical activation: Air or N₂, and two-stage continuous physical activation: Air > N₂ or N₂ > Air) and activation temperature on the characteristics of adsorbent derived from phosphoric acid treated CS and PKS. Furthermore, the determination of the BET (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) internal pore surface area and volume, structural analysis of the carbon crystals and pore bodies from the scanning electron microscope (SEM), chemical composition through CHNS/O and ash content while the surface chemical characteristics determined by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and thermal behaviour through thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were also taken as responses. Thus, this study not only provides the adsorption capabilities of biomass from the suggested physical activation methods but also insight into the design and performance of bioadsorbent from high-ash biomass with high adsorption value.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Preparation of samples prior to physical activation (H₃PO₄ pretreatment)

CS and PKS were collected, cleaned and dried in an oven at 105°C for 48 h. The dried raw materials were then crushed and sieved to 2–5 mm size range. Specified mass of the dried PKS and CS were impregnated with 30% phosphoric acid (H₃PO₄) with impregnation mass ratio of 1 : 1 at 80°C for 2 h. The pretreated particles were filtered and washed with distilled water. The washed pretreated particles were dried at 105°C for 48 h.

2.2. Physical activation process

The process of physical activation was performed in a horizontal laboratory tube furnace. For one-stage physical activation, the H₃PO₄ pretreated samples were activated for 75 and 105 min with air or N₂ gaseous (flow rate = 100 ml min⁻¹) at temperature 600, 700, 800 and 900°C, respectively. After, the one-stage physical activation, the activated samples were kept in desiccators for further analysis.

For two-stage continuous physical activation, the H₃PO₄ pretreated samples were activated continuously in two stages of different gas carrier: air and N₂. The activation temperature was set constant at 600, 700, 800 or 900°C for both activation stages with the heating rate of 3°C min⁻¹. For ‘N₂ > Air’ activation, the pretreated samples were activated in N₂ (flow rate = 100 ml min⁻¹) for 75 min before undergoing air activation (flow rate = 100 ml min⁻¹) for 30 min. While, for ‘Air > N₂’ activation, H₃PO₄ pretreated samples were activated with air (flow rate = 100 ml min⁻¹) for 75 min and followed by N₂ activation (flow rate = 100 ml min⁻¹) for 30 min. Samples were then cooled to room temperature by flowing N₂ through the activated samples (flow rate = 100 ml min⁻¹). After, the two-stage continuous physical activation, the activated samples were kept in desiccators for further analysis.

2.3. Characterization

The detail of the standard method testing process and calculation for the performance of bioadsorbent included BET surface area, specific surface area characteristics and iodine adsorption number was mentioned in our previous study [26]. In this study, methylene blue adsorption number was determined on the basis of Standard Method JIS K 1470–1991 [27,28]. The surface chemical characteristics of CS and PKS were determined by FTIR in the range of 700–4000 cm⁻¹. TGA was done using Perkin Elmer, USA, equipment. The experiments were performed in an inert atmosphere with a continuous flow of argon at the rate of 50 ml min⁻¹ and heated at a heating rate of 10°C min⁻¹. About 10 mg of samples was placed on a balance located in the furnace tube and heat was applied over the temperature range from 0 to 1000°C. In addition, the ultimate analysis of the bioadsorbent was performed in CHNS/O analyser (Perkin Elmer PE2400 Series ΙΙ). TAPPI standard method, T211 om-85 was used to determine the ash content. The oven-dried sample (2 g) was burned (dry oxidation) in a muffle furnace at 575 ± 25°C for 4 h. This standard test method was used to determine the volume of ash remaining after dry oxidation of the sample [29].

2.4. Data analysis

Statistical package for the social science (SPSS) was applied to evaluate the data of adsorption properties of bioadsorbent for ANOVA at 95% confident level (p ≤ 0.05). Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test was applied to analyse the differences of the treatment effects when significance was observed. The effects were considered not statistically significant when the p-value was higher than 0.05 at the 95% confidence level.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Adsorption properties of bioadsorbent

The adsorption properties of bioadsorbent derived from H₃PO₄ pretreated CS and PKS were compiled in table 1. For all the models, the ANOVA analysis showed p-value was less than 0.01 for the parameters, physical activation, activation temperature and gas carrier × activation temperature, signifying that the models were stiffly significant at the 99% confidence level for CS and PKS bioadsorbent. We may observe that there is an increase in the adsorption properties of the pretreated bioadsorbent as compared to the non-treated bioadsorbent. This could potentially be due to the removal of some components, e.g. tar-like matter, and phosphoric acid deposited in pores, which occurred better at higher activation temperature, leading to the development of micropores and mesopores [30]. Table 1 illustrates the effect of physical activation and activation temperature on adsorption of methylene blue using PKS and CS bioadsorbent. Activation temperature influenced the adsorption properties in two competitive ways. First and foremost, it was able to promote the diffusion rate of adsorbate molecules across the external boundary layer and internal pores of the adsorbent will enhance the adsorption rate. Furthermore, it can attenuate the force between adsorbent and adsorbate, improving the desorption rate [31]. The adsorption of methylene blue on both the bioadsorbents decreased significantly when the activation temperature went up to 900°C. The decrease of adsorption rate might be due to the limited quantities of available active sites on the surface of the bioadsorbent [32]. The quantity of active sites accessible for methylene blue adsorption rises once the porosity of the adsorbent increases [33]. Hence the result showed that high activation temperature will cause the decreased of porosity in bioadsorbent. Table 1 demonstrates that the air activated bioadsorbent obtained the highest methylene blue adsorption. This result verifies that the air activation promotes mesopore in bioadsorbent. Comparatively, bioadsorbents undergoing two-stage continuous physical activation achieved higher methylene blue adsorption than one-stage physical activation. Oxygen from air acted as a catalyst to enlarge or create mesopores in carbonaceous materials. The highest methylene blue adsorption (208.40 mg g⁻¹) for CS adsorbent was obtained when the CS was activated at 800°C in Air > N₂ activation. On the other hand, PKS sample activated at 700°C under Air > N₂ activation achieved the highest methylene blue adsorption (253.26 mg g⁻¹). Eventually, Air > N₂ physical activation delivered bioadsorbent with a highly mesoporous surface.

Table 1.

ANOVA for methylene blue and iodine adsorption of CS and PKS bioadsorbent (control—bioadsorbent without H₃PO₄ pretreatment). Note: means followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey multiple comparison test.

physical activation			adsorption properties
			methylene blue adsorption (mg g⁻¹)		iodine adsorption (mg g⁻¹)
time (min)	temperature (°C)	gas carrier	CS	PKS	CS	PKS
control (non-treated bioadsorbent)
raw material			1.79	0.77	1.71	1.28
75	700	Air	104.58	86.13	305.90	286.35
75	700	N₂	81.51	75.36	314.28	291.94
105	700	Air	64.60	66.90	227.71	202.58
105	700	N₂	61.52	63.06	233.30	208.17
one-stage physical activation
75	600	Air	71.00_f	78.69_e	277.05_f	291.01_b
75	700	Air	149.96_a	91.25_a	319.86_b	299.39_b
75	800	Air	103.30_c	82.28_d	291.94_d	271.46_c
75	900	Air	81.26_d	70.75_f	280.77_e	211.89_e
75	600	N₂	74.59_e	64.08_g	264.01_g	234.23_d
75	700	N₂	107.66_b	88.18_b	328.25_a	305.90_b
75	800	N₂	101.25_c	85.36_c	325.45_a	329.17_a
75	900	N₂	61.52_g	83.05_d	297.52_c	291.94_b
p-value			<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
105	600	Air	81.51_e	87.92_b	210.03_e	203.53_e
105	700	Air	101.76_a	93.05_a	250.05_c	230.50_b
105	800	Air	94.59_c	79.21_e	185.83_g	205.37_d
105	900	Air	77.67_f	67.93_h	177.45_h	147.65_h
105	600	N₂	76.13_g	70.75_g	202.58_f	200.72_f
105	700	N₂	95.36_b	84.85_c	277.05_a	247.26_a
105	800	N₂	87.67_d	82.28_d	266.81_b	213.75_c
105	900	N₂	58.19_h	72.29_f	214.68_d	177.45_g
p-value			<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
two-stage continuous physical activation
105	600	Air > N₂	102.79_g	245.31_b	384.09_f	406.43_d
105	700	Air > N₂	140.98_c	253.26_a	416.67_e	431.56_c
105	800	Air > N₂	208.40_a	158.16_d	439.01_d	329.17_e
105	900	Air > N₂	105.35_f	85.36_h	327.31_h	310.56_f
105	600	N₂ > Air	133.29_e	132.27_e	525.57_a	501.37_a
105	700	N₂ > Air	164.57_b	203.53_c	504.17_b	481.83_b
105	800	N₂ > Air	139.45_c	95.36_f	442.73_c	438.08_c
105	900	N₂ > Air	136.37_d	92.28_g	347.79_g	339.41_e
p-value			<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001

Open in a new tab

Iodine adsorption is the most fundamental parameter used to define and characterize the performance of adsorbent. Iodine adsorption was used as an approximation of the surface area of an adsorbent as well as a measure of micropores [34]. Besides, adsorbents with a high iodine adsorption number perform better in eliminating small sized contaminants in the field [35]. Table 1 reveals that both bioadsorbents obtained the lowest iodine adsorption via air activation, which may be caused by the high reactivity during air activation. The finding of Kyritsis [36] illustrated that oxygen will react at the entrances of the pores but does not penetrate into the narrow pores. Some researchers had reported that oxidation will partially destruct the micropore walls and, thus, generate low surface area on the adsorbent [37]. Moreover, the process of dehydrogenation occurred under N₂ activation but not under air activation due to the instability of the residue in the air [38]. The dehydrogenation properties will restrict the formation of tar and diminish the production of other volatile products, resulting in changeable aromatization of the carbon skeleton by the creation of a porous structure and surface area [39]. Under the circumstances, bioadsorbent prepared via N₂ activation achieved higher iodine adsorption when compared with air activation. Table 1 shows that the iodine adsorption for both bioadsorbents under two-stage continuous physical activation is higher than one-stage physical activation. After performing an ANOVA analysis on two-stage continuous physical activation, the result defined that the highest iodine adsorption was achieved when the lignocellulosic biomass was propelled by the N₂ > Air activation. The highest iodine number (525.57 and 501.37 mg g⁻¹) was recorded in the CS and PKS bioadsorbent produced at 600°C under N₂ > Air activation. Small pores are adept at adsorbing iodine molecules, and, thus, the quantity of iodine molecules adsorbed is often considered an indicator of the number of micropores in adsorbent [40–43]. The enhancement of iodine adsorption for both bioadsorbents via N₂ > Air activation indicated the increase of micropores on the bioadsorbent in this study.

Besides, it is proposed that H₃PO₄ impregnation not only promotes the pyrolytic decomposition of raw material but also leads to the formation of cross-linked structure [44]. Aside from affecting the development of the pores, particularly the size, H₃PO₄ pretreatment also affects the resulting adsorption properties. Experimental results show that the amount of adsorption capability increased dramatically with the H₃PO₄ pretreatment. Furthermore, the reaction time of the physical activation has a significant effect on the development of the carbon's porous networks. The reaction time should just be enough to eliminate all the moisture and most of the volatile components in the precursor to cause pores to develop [26]. Ironically, bioadsorbent treated for a shorter time reached a higher adsorptive capacity than bioadsorbent activated for a longer time. This may be partly due to the prolonged reaction time resulting in structural deformation, hence less surface area for adsorption [45]. For this reason, the bioadsorbent physically activated at 105 min achieved a lower adsorption than bioadsorbent prepared in 75 min.

3.2. Pore structure and surface area characteristics (BET surface area)

Evaluation of the surface characteristics and pore structures in this study was performed only on the non-treated and pretreated bioadsorbent that obtained the highest adsorption properties from one-stage physical activation and two-stage continuous physical activation.

The properties of the surface and porosity of adsorbent rely on the raw material, parameters of the thermal reaction (temperature and time) and physical activation (surrounding gas composition) [11]. Porosity in carbon materials primitively develops during physical activation due to irregular spacing between aromatic sheets. In spite of that, the pores are consequently clogged up as a result of the deposition of tarry materials [46]. With reference to table 2, the pretreated bioadsorbent achieved a higher surface area than the non-treated bioadsorbent. The high value of BET surface area in pretreated bioadsorbent is indicative of highly developed pore network within the carbon. The pretreated bioadsorbent also has smaller pore size than the non-treated bioadsorbent. The enlargement of surface area for both pretreated bioadsorbents may be accomplished via the creation of new micropores as propounded by the growth in the micropores surface area and pore volume. H₃PO₄ is the dehydrating agent that penetrates deep into the structure of the carbon causing tiny pores to develop [47]. Simultaneously, the bioadsorbents derived from the CS and PKS by H₃PO₄ pretreatment under appropriate process conditions have higher proportions of microporous and mesoporous with a high surface area. Apart from that, a longer physical activation promoted reduction in both surface area and total pore volume, presumably due to the collapse of smaller pores, as inferred from the decrease in micropore volume [23]. As shown in table 2, the BET surface area of the bioadsorbent prepared by H₃PO₄ for 105 min is lower compared to the bioadsorbent prepared under 75 min. It is also lower in terms of percentage of micropore to the BET surface area of the sample. Generally, further increase in the reaction time resulted in the decrease of the micropore distribution, similar to that of BET surface area.

Table 2.

The surface area and pore size characterization of the prepared bioadsorbent (control—bioadsorbent without H₃PO₄ pretreatment).

physical activation			pore structure and surface area characteristics of bioadsorbent
			BET surface area (m² g⁻¹)		pore size (nm)		micropore volume (cm³ g⁻¹)
time (min)	gas carrier	temperature (°C)	CS	PKS	CS	PKS	CS	PKS
control (non-treated bioadsorbent)
raw material			0.84	0.79	6.30	7.21	0.0013	0.0014
75	N₂	700	91.39	69.42	45.82	82.06	0.03	0.01
one-stage physical activation
75	Air	700	124.32	99.19	47.13	36.88	0.01	0.0004
75	N₂	700	147.91	114.55	6.58	6.27	0.06	0.06
105	Air	700	87.75	82.27	73.87	78.43	0.04	0.03
105	N₂	700	114.55	98.09	7.13	7.55	0.04	0.04
two-stage continuous physical activation
105	Air > N₂	700	—	169.76	—	6.07	—	0.06
105	Air > N₂	800	179.61	—	7.99	—	0.05	—
105	N₂ > Air	600	479.17	456.47	0.62	0.63	0.15	0.13

Open in a new tab

In this study, two-stage continuous physical activation is attempted for the purpose of clearing off disorganized carbon and opening up clogged pores, and simultaneously creating new pores by selectively burning off the carbon atoms. In conformity with table 2, figures 1 and 2, two-stage continuous physical activation leads to a considerable increase in both the BET surface area and porosity including micropore surface area and micropore volume as compared to single activation. Figures 1 and 2 also depict the porosity ratio distribution of the produced bioadsorbent. The micropore porosity ratio for bioadsorbents prepared under two-stage continuous physical activation was higher than one-stage physical activation. The porosity ratio results declared that bioadsorbent prepared via Air > N₂ activation produced the higher mesoporous structure. This result directly related to the methylene blue adsorption results, as bioadsorbent prepared via Air > N₂ activation obtained the highest methylene blue adsorption (table 1). Meanwhile, a significant decrease in pore size for samples prepared under N₂ > Air activation implied that this activation method promotes the formation of narrower porosity (eight times smaller than the sample prepared by Air > N₂ activation). Table 2 also shows the highest micropore volume (0.15 and 0.13 cm³ g⁻¹ for CS and PKS bioadsorbent, respectively) resulted when both bioadsorbents were activated under N₂ > Air activation. The results denoted that N₂ > Air activation elicits an increase in pore volume and reduction of pore size, resulting in high surface area for both bioadsorbents. The highest BET surface area was obtained from bioadsorbent prepared under N₂ > Air activation with 482.24 and 456.47 mg g⁻¹ for CS and PKS, respectively. This may be explained by the oxygen groups probably being fixed at the most active sites at the entrance of the micropores during the pre-oxidation stage for Air > N₂ activation. Therefore, the access of nitrogen to these micropores becomes difficult [48], and as consequence, adding N₂ activation after Air activation was not able to induce many pores, thus, the specific surface area was not greatly increased. On the contrary, N₂ > Air activation promotes the bioadsorbent with higher microporous structure. CS and PKS bioadsorbent contained 76.55% and 75.22%, respectively, of micropore distribution when prepared under N₂ > Air activation. The observed increases in micropore distribution were primarily ascribed to the thermal decomposition of surface functional groups from the inside of pores upon pre-heat treatment with nitrogen [49–51]. This preferentially leads to micropore formation instead of pore enlargement which explains why the pore size of the sample via N₂ > Air activation was approximately 10 times smaller than the other samples. This is well visualized by SEM image. The SEM image of bioadsorbent prepared via N₂ > Air activation (figure 5o,5p shows that the microscopic shape of bioadsorbent is an agglomeration of sub-micrometre particles. The enhancement of the formation of micropore surface area by N₂ > Air activation is favourable to promote higher adsorption for the bioadsorbent. The high micropore distribution translates the suitability of the activation method used in this study. Thus, N₂ > Air activation method was found to produce the highest quality of bioadsorbent among the activation methods used in this study. CS and PKS bioadsorbents prepared under N₂ > Air activation acquire a high potential in activated carbon application with its comparable high surface area.

Figure 1. — Porosity ratio of CS bioadsorbent.

Figure 2. — Porosity ratio of PKS bioadsorbent.

Figure 5. — (a–p) Scanning electron micrograph of bioadsorbent activated under different physical activation in low magnification (50 µm).

Table 3 shows the characteristics of bioadsorbents produced in this work and also from other recent studies by other researchers. It shows the results of the surface area characteristic of the bioadsorbent made from different precursors and condition of activation. Among them, the bioadsorbent produced in this study apparently possesses the best quality in terms of its porosity characteristics. CS and PKS prepared via two-stage continuous physical activation at 600°C are preferable because they possess higher BET surface areas. In other words, they have higher adsorption sites for molecules to attach onto the surface of the carbon.

Table 3.

Comparison of preparation and characteristics of bioadsorbent from this work with other studies.

references	biomass	activation condition	BET value (m² g⁻¹)
present work	CS	two-stage continuous physical activation	479.17
present work	PKS	two-stage continuous physical activation	456.47
[52]	PKS	KOH at 800°C for 45 min	119.3
[53]	empty fruit bunch	(700°C) for 2 h under N₂ flow (150 cm³ min⁻¹)	231.52
[53]	oil palm mesocarp fibre	(700°C) for 2 hr under N² flow (150 cm³ min⁻¹)	239.50
[54]	cotton seed shell	sulfuric acid	124.35
[55]	corn husk and sugarcane bagasse	carbonized with temperature 500°C for 2 h in N₂ and continued activate in air atmosphere for 40 min	256
[56]	date stone	physical (N₂ and steam) at 700°C for 60 min	322

Open in a new tab

3.3. N₂ adsorption

Nitrogen adsorption is the standard channel to evaluate the porosity of carbonaceous adsorbent. The adsorption isotherm provides the information source for the porous structure of the adsorbent, heat of adsorption, physico-chemical characteristics and others. Figures 3 and 4 established the N₂-adsorption isotherm acquired from the raw material, non-treated bioadsorbent and bioadsorbent sample prepared from CS and PKS under the optimum conditions (bioadsorbent with highest adsorption properties from one-stage physical activation and two-stage continuous physical activation). Most isotherms have been shown to conform to one of the five types of International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) classification. Both precursors and non-treated bioadsorbent conform to type II isotherm, where B points out the zone where the monolayer becomes filled. The inflection point of the isotherm usually occurs near the completion of the first adsorbed monolayer and with increasing relative pressure, second and higher layers are completed until at saturation the number of adsorbed layers becomes infinite. This indicated that both precursors were non-porous or whole externally. While both high-ash agricultural biomass that had undergone one-stage physical activation (only Air and only N₂) and Air > N₂ two-stage continuous physical activation conform to type IV isotherm. This indicated a significant microporous and mesoporous network system present in both bioadsorbents. From the result obtained, both bioadsorbents prepared using N₂ > Air activation conform to type I isotherm, disclosing that the bioadsorbents are given by microporous solids having relatively small external surfaces such as activated carbons, molecular sieve zeolites and certain porous oxides.

Figure 3. — N₂-Adsorption isotherm for the sample at 77 K for CS bioadsorbent.

Figure 4. — N₂-Adsorption isotherm for the sample at 77 K for PKS bioadsorbent.

3.4. Scanning electron micrograph

Figure 5a,b presents the micrographs for CS and PKS employed as the raw material for the preparation of bioadsorbent. The surface of the raw material was dense and planar without any cracks and crevices. This would account for its poor or negligible BET surface area (table 2). As shown in figure 5a,b, we noticed that the surface of raw material CS shows holes that were spaced out on the surface with smooth edges, whereas raw material PKS was smooth without any ridges or pores. Most of the pores of the CS were closed up and the pores for PKS were not visible at the magnification of the SEM. After the N₂ physical activation, the surface morphology showed cracks but no visible pore development occurred on both non-treated bioadsorbents (figure 5c,d). Phosphoric acid pretreatment preserved better starting structure of CS and PKS bioadsorbent. This phenomenon is in relation to the pore structure and surface area characteristics surface morphology of the pretreated bioadsorbent (table 2). Despite that, the cellular structure of CS and PKS was noticeable after chemical pretreatment and physical activation. Large amounts of orderly pores are developing on the pretreated CS and PKS bioadsorbent surface with broken edges (figure 5e,f). This was attributed to a small amount of impurities such as tar that may cause the pore to clog up and inhibit good pore structure development [52]. Thus, activation stage (H₃PO₄ pretreatment) was able to produce an extensive external surface with high surface area on the pretreated bioadsorbent. In general, the choice of the reaction time for the activation depends on the desired porous structure distributions. Except for a lot of ‘nodule-like’ structures which can be clearly seen in the external surface of the pretreated bioadsorbent which was prepared for 105 min (figure 5i–l), no significant change is observed in the exterior surface structure compared to the bioadsorbent prepared for 75 min, thereby indicating that the gasification occurs mainly in the interior of the particles and presumably is channelled out to the ‘nodule-like’ structures.

According to figure 5e,f, when both lignocellulosic biomasses are prepared under air activation, we noticed that the surface becomes coarser/rougher or more plicated, presumably resulted from the loss of char mass under oxygen attack. Some dirt-covered/impurities and unclear pores were present on the surface of the CS bioadsorbent (figure 5e). Such rudimentary porous structure and deposition of tarry substances in the interstices of the sample was caused by the incomplete volatile release [6,57–59]. In contrast, the surface morphology of PKS (figure 5f) with large pores was covered with silica. Oxygen from the high reactivity of air activation reacted at the entrances of the pores and does not penetrate into the narrow pores was stated by Savova et al. [60]. Henceforth, this may clarify that bioadsorbent prepared with air activation produced an oxidized carbon with the low BET surface area and low micropore porosity ratio 9.19 and 5.16% for CS and PKS bioadsorbent. Further, the bioadsorbents induced by air consisted of the surface area with a predominantly macroporous structure with the pore size of 6.58 and 6.27 nm for CS and PKS bioadsorbent, respectively (table 2). Correspondingly, some researchers proved that using nitrogen gas as carrier gas produced a very small surface area [16,23]. Better information may be obtained from figure 5g; carbon skeleton structure appeared on the surface of CS under N₂ activation. The smooth surface area with absence of pores urged the low BET surface area for CS bioadsorbent prepared under N₂ activation. Besides, the micrographs (figure 5d) manifested that the surface condition of the PKS bioadsorbent was primitively hard and rough, and the pores were clogged by the silica bodies. Based on the study of Razali et al. [61] silica acted to protect the biomass structure and enhance its mechanical strength. Figure 5h demonstrated the silica still present on the bioadsorbent activated with N₂ activation. The presence of the silica on the surface of bioadsorbent will produce limited surface area, suggesting an inhibition of the reaction. The limited surface area may be caused by the low micropore volume; as demonstrated in table 3, the micropore volumes for CS and PKS bioadsorbents are only 0.06 and 0.04 cm³ g⁻¹, respectively.

Additional physical activation stage via N₂ after air activation (Air > N₂) for 75 min had reduced the silica compounds that naturally attached to the surface of CS and PKS (figure 5m,n). The rough appearance was observed at CS adsorbent produced under Air > N₂ activation. The formation of longitudinal cells in the transverse section shows the fragility and lightness of the CS bioadsorbent. Likewise, the open pores appearing on the CS bioadsorbent surface can be due to the reduction of volatile species. On the other hand, occasional cracking occurred on the surface area of PKS activated under Air > N₂ activation method. The cracking was probably due to the drastic combustion when oxygen was present during the air activation. The clogged-up pore and drastic combustion had inclined the BET surface value (179.61 and 169.76 mg g⁻¹ for CS and PKS) for bioadsorbents prepared under Air > N₂ activation. Additional stage of air activation after N₂ activation (N₂ > Air) increased the development of pores structure on the bioadsorbent (figure 5o,p). The well-developed porous structure was due to the significant reduction of the silica compounds attached to the surface of CS and PKS, which open up more reactive surfaces for the activation process. When the sample was prepared under N₂ > Air activation, the CS surface structures (figure 5o) have burnt-out pore with tunnel. The unclogged pore contributed high BET surface area with high micropore porosity ratio (76.55%) for CS bioadsorbent stimulated under N₂ > Air activation. At the same time, the morphology of PKS attests substantial changes provoked by N₂ > Air activation. Figure 5p clearly attested the porous nature with a predominant microporous character (pore size for PKS bioadsorbent is 0.63 nm) responsible for the developing of high surface area and high iodine adsorption. In addition, figure 5o,p also proved that N₂ > Air activation managed to unclog the pores deposited with tarry material, silica or silicate derivatives during the process of physical activation. The surface morphology in figure 5o,p shows favourable characteristics for high adsorption capability, elucidating that N₂ > Air two-stage continuous physical activation is effective in creating well-developed pores for CS and PKS bioadsorbents.

Overall, it was observed that bioadsorbent generated under one-stage physical activation failed to create sufficient porosities, caused by the deficient decomposition of organic constituents existing in the carbonaceous precursors. Thus, the pores were significantly clogged by the residues of products, leading to a decreased surface area with less porosity. N₂ > Air activation prompted the bioadsorbent with the surface area consisting of abundant micropores, instigating the high BET surface area for both bioadsorbents. The SEM results have displayed that N₂ > Air activation created new ultra-micropores and enlarged existing pores to generate new supermicropores and mesopores. Besides, N₂ > Air activation would have made previously closed ultra-micropores accessible. Lignocellulosic biomass generated with N₂ > Air activation thereupon was suggested as it was able to reduce the formation of silica, which blocked the pores and constrained the development of pores structures.

3.5. CHNS/O and ash content

Evaluation of the element data in this study was performed only on the non-treated and pretreated bioadsorbent that obtained the highest adsorption properties from one-stage physical activation and two-stage continuous physical activation.

The physico-chemical characteristics and potential uses of adsorbent are greatly influenced by the biomass feedstock, feedstock pretreatments, carbonization method and activating conditions, such as temperature, gas type and reaction time [62]. Table 4 presents the contents of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen and ash content of the bioadsorbent. Compared with the non-treated bioadsorbent, H₃PO₄ pretreated bioadsorbent displayed a very distinctive chemical composition. The carbon content was much higher, whereas its contents of hydrogen, nitrogen, sulfur and ash, were lower. This distinctive chemical composition suggests that the H₃PO₄ pretreated bioadsorbent might have its unique structure, which would considerably affect its adsorption behaviour. For instance, the high-ash content could render the bioadsorbent less polar and give rise to its higher affinity to non-polar adsorbates compared with the ordinary activated carbons [30]. Carbon content will be higher after physically activation [63]. Generally, the carbon content should increase with physical activation temperature, because there is an enrichment of elemental carbon, while the other elements, such as nitrogen, are largely removed with the off-gases during the physical activation [64]. Table 4 shows that the carbon content of both bioadsorbents increased as the ash content decreased significantly. This could have been caused by physical activation at high temperature in which most of the organic substances were degraded and discharged as gas and liquid tars, while leaving the material with high carbon purity [65,66]. As shown in table 4, CS and PKS bioadsorbent prepared under N₂ activation have a higher carbon content compared with Air activation. Whereas, the ash content for both bioadsorbents produced under air activation was higher than under N₂ physical activation. A greater value of ash content aids the limited combustible components kept in the pretreated biomass [67]. Under the circumstances, it was inadequate to carbonize the CS and PKS using only air as the carrier gas in the whole activation process.

Table 4.

Contents of C, H, N, O and ash of the bioadsorbent (% oven-dried weight).

physical activation			CHNS and ash content
			C		N		S		H		O		ash
time (min)	gas carrier	temp. (°C)	CS	PKS	CS	PKS	CS	PKS	CS	PKS	CS	PKS	CS	PKS
control (non-treated bioadsorbent)
raw material			45.93	46.12	0.94	0.79	0.01	0.03	10.79	5.50	42.33	47.56	0.17	0.20
75	N₂	700	46.45	47.12	0.53	0.48	0.01	0.01	8.32	4.65	44.69	47.74	34.43	37.21
one-stage physical activation
75	Air	700	63.03	59.22	0.38	0.39	0.01	0.01	8.15	4.56	28.43	35.82	9.95	9.65
75	N₂	700	63.44	61.88	0.39	0.38	0.01	0.01	8.65	4.01	27.51	33.72	6.89	7.54
115	Air	700	54.23	49.76	0.42	0.43	0.01	0.01	9.12	5.07	36.22	44.73	13.65	14.11
115	N₂	700	57.85	52.58	0.31	0.40	0.01	0.01	8.79	4.93	33.04	42.08	12.08	12.87
two-stage continuous physical activation
115	Air > N₂	700	—	62.03	—	0.35	—	0.06	—	1.40	—	36.16	6.13	9.28
115	Air > N₂	800	56.90	—	0.07	—	0.06	—	6.76	—	36.21	—	8.13	14.37
115	N₂ > Air	600	69.12	65.11	0.06	0.33	0.06	0.06	3.88	1.50	26.88	33.00	5.42	5.56

Open in a new tab

According to table 4, the carbon content of bioadsorbents prepared under one-stage physical activation is lower than two-stage continuous physical activation. The increased carbon content was due to the thermal degradation of volatile components [68]. The highest carbon content for CS and PKS bioadsorbent was 69.12 and 65.11% when both bioadsorbents were activated at 600°C under N₂ > Air activation. Owing to the high carbon content, bioadsorbent which was prepared by two-stage continuous physical activation is the preferred adsorbent in comparison to one-stage physical activation. The increase of carbon content also indicates an increase in the polarity upon mild oxidation of N₂ > Air activation. This indicates that the PKS and CS bioadsorbent fits into the active carbon. Moreover, the off-gases that develop during N₂ > Air activation in an oxygen-poor environment are used for their energy potential. The remaining solid that is rich in elemental carbon may be used in various applications [64]. Table 4 illustrates that the ash content for bioadsorbent prepared under Air > N₂ was higher than N₂ > Air activation. The higher ash content from Air > N₂ activation suggests the presence of higher amount of oxides or inorganic impurities formed at the surface of bioadsorbent. It is known that the presence of ash can affect the chemical characteristics and the adsorptive behaviour of activated carbon [68]. Thus, bioadsorbent with the low level of ash obtained via N₂ > Air activation obtained in the present study has a desirable characteristic. The elemental analysis revealed that the sample with the highest carbon content was prepared via N₂ > Air activation, which supports the fact that this physical activation is suitable for producing high-grade activated carbon. Nitrogen content and sulfur content of the samples prepared in two-stage continuous physical activation were very low in the analysis. For elemental analysis, oxygen content is also an important aspect, because it can form surface oxygen functional groups, such as carboxylic acid and carbonyls that have an impact on the adsorption process [55,69]. The higher the oxygen content, the lower the amount of surfactant adsorbed [70]. In this present study, N₂ > Air activation formed highly porous bioadsorbent with oxygen content that is lower than other carbon materials produced by conventional processes.

3.6. FTIR

Evaluations of the surface chemical characteristics in this study were performed only on the bioadsorbent that obtained the highest adsorption properties and the highest surface area for both bioadsorbent prepared under one-stage physical activation (N₂ for at 700°C) and two-stage continuous physical activation (N₂ > Air at 600°C).

Figure 6 displays the FTIR spectra of bioadsorbents derived from CS and PKS prepared under N₂ single physical activation and N₂ > Air two-stage continuous physical activation. Figure 6 suggests that N-containing groups were introduced to the structure of bioadsorbent that was prepared under N₂ activation. Peaks of 1539, 1558 and 1618 cm⁻¹; and 1558 and 3319 cm⁻¹ indicate the presence of N–H stretch on the CS and PKS bioadsorbent, respectively [71]. The higher adsorption rate and capacity toward heavy metal was obtained in the case of nitrogenated carbons. In this aspect, nitrogen-containing porous carbons with high surface area are recently receiving a great deal of attention due to their specific structures and unique properties [72–75]. For example, they show enhanced adsorption capacity of anions, resulting from a positively charged carbon surface, and improved thermal stability by incorporating heteroatoms when they are used as catalytic supports [75].

The new appearance of bands from 650 to 900 cm⁻¹ indicate an increase in aromatic nature for the activated compounds [76] prepared under N₂ > Air activation. The peaks of 742, 812 and 899 cm⁻¹ in CS bioadsorbent and 723, 781, 814 and 916 cm⁻¹ might be due to the presence of C–H out of plane bending in benzene derivatives. FTIR reveals the broad peaks at 1213 and 1212 cm⁻¹ on CS and PKS bioadsorbents under two-stage continuous activation, respectively. Peaks detected at 1200–1300 cm⁻¹ attribute to C–O–C group of stretching mode in acids, alcohols, phenols, ethers and esters [77,78]. It can be stated that N₂ > Air activation formed ester linkages with the –OH groups helping to cross-link the polymer chains of the bioadsorbent. Additionally, the general increase in band intensities with activation treatment from around 600 to 1300 cm⁻¹ is indicative of phosphorus-containing groups being formed during thermal activation [76]. Two-stage continuous physical activation (N₂ > Air) also promoted two sharp peaks at 1368 and 1578 cm⁻¹ for CS bioadsorbent and one sharp peak at 1368 cm⁻¹ for PKS bioadsorbent. These sharp peaks can be ascribed to the asymmetric COO⁻ vibration and symmetric COO⁻ vibration, respectively [79,80]. Absorptions at 1578 cm⁻¹ present on CS adsorbent correspond to C–C stretching vibrations and NH₂ in the benzene ring. Based on the study, both bioadsorbents expressed a more distinct absorbance by oxygenated groups at 1740 cm⁻¹. This peak absorption reveals that mild oxidation from N₂ > Air physical activation increases the concentration of carbonyl functional groups on the surface of the CS and PKS bioadsorbent. Mild air oxidation generates a more uniform spatial distribution of oxygenated functional groups for the adsorbent [81]. In addition, bands at 1725–1740 cm⁻¹ are the characteristic stretching vibration of carbonyl group C=O in esters and carboxylic acids [79,80]. Whereas, there are strong peaks located at 2302 and 2384 cm⁻¹ for CS bioadsorbent and 2302 and 2346 cm⁻¹ in PKS bioadsorbent. These peaks assign to the vibration of C≡N and C≡C, respectively [82]. CS bioadsorbent showed a weak but visible absorption at 2564 cm⁻¹ considered as S–H bond stretching vibration. These clearly demonstrated that –SH group had been successfully grafted onto the surface of CS bioadsorbent prepared under N₂ > Air physical activation. Figure 6 displays the peaks of 2967 cm⁻¹ in CS bioadsorbent and 2869 and 2972 cm⁻¹ in PKS bioadsorbent which represent the characteristic of C–H stretch of imidazole. Anisuzzaman [77] stated that spectra range between 2800 and 3000 cm⁻¹ refers to the C–H stretching in the alkane group. Likewise, figure 6 indicates spectra's vibrations, implied that it may have the presence of monomeric alcohols or phenols due to the wavenumbers corresponding to 3010, 3439 and 3670 cm⁻¹ for CS bioadsorbent and 3635 cm⁻¹ for PKS bioadsorbent prepared under N₂ > Air activation. Anisuzzaman [77] also reported that the peaks detected in the spectra at bandwidths of 3300–3800 cm⁻¹ represent O–H stretching vibration of surface hydroxylic functional groups in low concentrations. Besides, the band of O–H stretching vibrations reveals the existence of chemisorbed water from the activated bioadsorbent. The asymmetry of this band indicates the presence of strong hydrogen bonds in the adsorbent [83].

The surface chemistry and pore structure of porous carbons determine its application. The surface chemistry could be modified by various methods, such as acid treatment, oxidization, ammonization, plasma, microwave treatment and others. Oxygen-containing functional groups have been devoted as the main groups responsible for heavy metal binding on the activated carbon surface [48]. It was found that the N₂ > Air two-stage continuous physical activation not only greatly increased the specific surface area but also caused the formation of oxygen-containing groups (−OH and C=O) on the CS and PKS bioadsorbent surface. Oxidation is one of the most conventional modification techniques used to induce or enhance oxygen functional groups on the surface of activated carbon such as carboxylic, lactones, phenols, ketones, quinones, hydroxyl and carboxylic anhydride [48,84]; it can also remove the mineral elements and improve the hydrophilic nature of the surface [48,85]. These acidic surface groups are polar and enhance the ion exchange properties of the carbon, thereby increasing the adsorption of cation [48,85]. Thus, the surface oxygen-containing functional group had been adequately introduced to the bioadsorbent via N₂ > Air activation in this study. Owing to the high surface areas and well-developed porous structures, and the presence of different types of functional groups on their surfaces, the porous bioadsorbent prepared via N₂ > Air may be applied in many areas including the protection of natural environment by removing sulfur compounds, nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide; purification of wastewater by removing heavy metal ions, aromatic compounds and dye molecules; use of catalysis or catalyst supports and others.

3.7. TGA

Evaluations of the thermal behaviour characteristics in this study were performed only on the bioadsorbent that obtained the highest adsorption properties and the highest surface area for both bioadsorbents prepared under N₂ > Air two-stage continuous physical activation at 600°C.

By analysing the TGA results, we found that bioadsorbent prepared under two-stage continuous activation gained a low weight loss. Three zones of the profile are obtained for both cases. Apparently with respect in increasing temperature from 400 to 800°C, the total weight loss for pretreated CS and PKS are 22.29 and 16.36%, respectively. From this result (figure 7), it was found that both physically activated bioadsorbents exhibit high thermal stability. The high thermal stability behaviour may be due to the new oxygen functional groups introduced on the bioadsorbent via two-stage continuous activation. Some researchers had stated oxygen-containing function groups, such as anhydride, lactones and epoxy groups containing –C–O–C–, exhibited better thermal stability and were only decomposed at a higher temperature [86,87]. Approximately 63.83 and 69.01% of the mass for CS and PKS bioadsorbent, respectively, are still not volatilized at 1000°C. The greater thermal stability of the activated bioadsorbents is also thought to be because they have more stable structures with higher carbon assay [88]. Thus, TGA result displays that both bioadsorbents prepared via N₂ > Air activation achieved high amount of residue.

Figure 7. — TGA of bioadsorbent derived from CS and PKS prepared under two-stage continuous physical activation.

4. Conclusion

Ash leaching method with phosphoric acid prior to physical activation is able to remove a huge fraction of ash-forming elements in biomass; however, it is unable to remove ash components such as silica or silicate from high-ash agricultural biomass such as PKS and CS. Removal of the silica compounds attached to the surface of the agriculture biomass opens up more reactive surfaces for the physical activation process and, thus, creates a bioadsorbent with a higher surface area. From this study, higher reduction of silica was achieved by additional stage of air activation after N₂ activation (N₂ > Air) which increased the development of pores structure on the bioadsorbent. This novel process was able to expose mesopores and micropores that were previously covered/clogged in nature, and simultaneously create new pores. The optimum condition to achieve the highest BET value for H₃PO₄ pretreated PKS and CS is via two-stage continuous physical activation of N₂ > Air under 600°C activation temperature. Introducing low-temperature activation process as applied in this study modestly increases the feasible expansion potential towards industrial scale. This novel process of two-stage continuous physical activation meets the recent industrial adsorbent requirements of low activation temperature, high fixed carbon content, high yield, high adsorption properties and high surface area, which are the key factors in large-scale production and usage.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support given by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE) under the Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE) project at the Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products. The authors also sincerely thank the postgraduate students that participated in the field sampling exercise.

Data accessibility

Adsorption properties; BET surface area; N₂ adsorption; FTIR and TGA files have been uploaded to the Dryad Digital Repository at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.ch8gf53 [89].

Authors' contributions

C.L.L.: data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content. P.S.H.: agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. M.T.P.: final approval of the version to be published. K.L.C.: drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content. U.R.: final approval of the version to be published. M.M.: acquisition of data. W.Z.G.: analysis and interpretation of data. R.A.R.N.: data collection. S.N.A.R.: data collection. P.S.K.: data collection.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

The authors are grateful for the financial support from co-author H'ng Paik San under the Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE) project at the Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products which was given by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE).

References

1.Kundu A, Gupta BS, Hashim MA, Sahu JN, Mujawar M, Redzwan G. 2015. Optimisation of the process variables in production of activated carbon by microwave heating. RSC Adv. 5, 35 899– 35 908. ( 10.1039/C4RA16900J) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
2.Abood MM, Rajendiran J, Azhari NN. 2015. Agricultural waste as low cost adsorbent for the removal of Fe (II) ions from aqueous solution. Infrastruct. Univ. Kuala Lumpur Res. J. 3, 29–39. [Google Scholar]
3.Abdel-Ghani NT, Hefny M, El-Chaghaby GAF. 2007. Removal of lead from aqueous solution using low cost abundantly available adsorbents. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4, 67–73. ( 10.1007/BF03325963) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
4.Rahman MM, Adil M, Yusof AM, Kamaruzzaman YB, Ansary RH. 2014. Removal of heavy ions with acid activated carbons derived from oil palm and coconut shell. Material 7, 3634–3650. ( 10.3390/ma7053634) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Ioannidou O, Zabaniotou A. 2007. Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production—a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11, 1966–2005. ( 10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.013) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6.Olivares-Marín M, Fernández-González C, MacÍas-García A, Gómez-Serrano V. 2012. Preparation of activated carbon from cherry stones by physical activation in air. Influence of the chemical carbonisation with H₂SO₄. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 94, 131–137. ( 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.11.019) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7.Hong J, Xiaomin W, Zhengrong G. 2013. Hierarchical carbon materials from high ash bio-char of distiller's dried grain with solubles for supercapacitor. Mater. Focus 2, 105–112. ( 10.1166/mat.2013.1059) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8.Brewer CE, Unger R, Schmidt-Rohr K, Brown RC. 2011. Criteria to select biochars for field studies based on biochar chemical properties. Bioenergy Res. 4, 312–323. ( 10.1007/s12155-011-9133-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
9.Molina-Sabio M, Rodríguez-Reinoso F. 2004. Role of chemical activation in the development of carbon porosity. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 241, 15–25. ( 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
10.Nahil MA, Williams PT. 2012. Characterisation of activated carbons with high surface area and variable porosity produced from agricultural cotton waste by chemical activation and co-activation. Waste Biomass Valorization 3, 117–130. ( 10.1007/s12649-012-9109-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11.Xiao F, Pignatello JJ. 2016. Effects of post-pyrolysis air oxidation of biomass chars on adsorption of neutral and ionizable compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 6276–6283. ( 10.1021/acs.est.6b00362) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Ahmadpour A, Do DD. 1996. The preparation of active carbons from coal by chemical and physical activation. Carbon NY 34, 471–479. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00204-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
13.Ahmadpour A, Do DD. 1997. The preparation of activated carbon from macadamia nutshell by chemical activation. Carbon NY 35, 1723–1732. ( 10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00127-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14.Caturla F, Molina-Sabio M, Rodríguez-Reinoso F. 1991. Preparation of activated carbon by chemical activation with ZnCl₂. Carbon NY 29, 999–1007. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(91)90179-M) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15.Hu Z, Srinivasan M. 1999. Preparation of high-surface-area activated carbon from coconut shell. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 27, 11–18. ( 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.03.059) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16.Laine J, Calafat A. 1989. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from coconut shell impregnated with phosphoric acid. Carbon NY 27, 191–195. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(89)90123-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
17.Lua AC, Yang T. 2005. Characteristics of activated carbon prepared from pistachio-nut shell by zinc chloride activation under nitrogen and vacuum conditions. Colloid Interface Sci. 290, 505–513. ( 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.04.063) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Molina-Sabio M, Rodríguez-Reinoso F, Caturla F, Sellés MJ. 1996. Development of porosity in combined phosphoric acid-carbon dioxide activation. Carbon NY 34, 457–462. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00209-X) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19.Otowa T, Nojima Y, Miyazaki T. 1997. Development of KOH activated high surface area carbon and its application to drinking water purification. Carbon NY 35, 1315–1319. ( 10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00076-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
20.Rodríguez-Reinoso F, Molina-Sabio M. 1992. Activated carbons from lignocellulosic materials by chemical and/or physical activation: an overview. Carbon NY 30, 1111–1118. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(92)90143-K) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
21.Rwayhah YM, Hassan M, Shehata M. 2017. Nanoporous activated carbon from olive stones wastes. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 76, 725–732. [Google Scholar]
22.Kohls DJ, Beaucage G. 2002. Rational design of reinforced rubber. Solid State Mater. Sci. 6, 183–194. ( 10.1016/S1359-0286(02)00073-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23.Vernersson T, Bonelli PR, Cerrela EG, Cukierman AL. 2002. Arundo donax cane as a precursor for activated carbons preparation by phosphoric acid activation. Bioresour. Technol. 83, 95–104. ( 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00205-X) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Mahinpey N, Murugan P, Mani T, Raina R. 2009. Analysis of bio-oil, biogas, and biochar from pressurized pyrolysis of wheat straw using a tubular reactor. Energy Fuels 23, 2736–2742. ( 10.1021/ef8010959) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
25.Hung JJ. 2012. The production of activated carbon from coconut shells using pyrolysis and fluidized bed reactors. University of Arizona; See http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/243968/1/azu_etd_mr_2012_0079_sip1_m.pdf. [Google Scholar]
26.Lee CL, H'ng PS, Paridah MT, Chin KL, Khoo PS, Nazrin RAR, Asyikin SN, Mariusz M. 2017. Effect of reaction time and temperature on the properties of carbon black made from palm kernel and coconut shell. Asian J. Sci. Res. 10, 24–33. ( 10.3923/ajsr.2017.Research) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
27.Anonymous. 1992. Japanese Standard Association. Standard testing method of methylene blue number of activated carbon 1470–1991.
28.Joshi S, Pokharel BP. 2014. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from Lapsi (Choerospondias axillaris) seed stone by chemical activation with potassium hydroxide. J. Inst. Eng. 9, 79–88. ( 10.3126/jie.v9i1.10673) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
29.Chin KL, H'ng PS, Go WZ, Wong WZ, Lim TW, Maminski M, Paridah MT, Luqman AC. 2013. Optimization of torrefaction conditions for high energy density solid biofuel from oil palm biomass and fast growing species available in Malaysia. Ind. Crops Prod. 49, 768–774. ( 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.06.007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
30.Patnukao P, Pavasant P. 2008. Activated carbon from Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn bark using phosphoric acid activation. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 8540–8543. ( 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.049) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Asadullah M, Kabir MS, Ahmed MB, Razak NA, Rasid NSA, Aezzira A. 2013. Role of microporosity and surface functionality of activated carbon in methylene blue dye removal from water. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 30, 2228–2234. ( 10.1007/s11814-013-0172-y) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
32.Liu X, He C, Yu X, Bai Y, Ye L, Wang B, Zhang L. 2018. Net-like porous activated carbon materials from shrimp shell by solution-processed carbonization and H₃PO₄ activation for methylene blue adsorption. Powder Technol. 326, 181–189. ( 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.12.034) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
33.Novais RM, Ascensão G, Tobaldi DM, Seabra MP, Labrincha JA. 2018. Biomass fly ash geopolymer monoliths for effective methylene blue removal from wastewaters. J. Clean Prod. 171, 783–794. ( 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.078) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
34.Babatunde OA, Garba S, Ali ZN. 2016. Surface modification of activated carbon for improved iodine and carbon tetrachloride adsorption. Am. J. Chem. 6, 74–79. ( 10.5923/j.chemistry.20160603.02) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
35.Itodo A, Abdulrahman F, Hassan L, Maigandi S, Itodo H. 2010. Application of methylene blue and iodine adsorption in the measurement of specific surface area by four acid and salt treated activated carbons. New York Sci. J. 3, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
36.Kyritsis S. 2001. 1st world conference on biomass for energy and industry. II. Sevilla, Spain: James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd. [Google Scholar]
37.Montes V, Hill JM. 2018. Pore enlargement of carbonaceous materials by metal oxide catalysts in the presence of steam: influence of metal oxide size and porosity of starting material. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 256, 91–101. ( 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.08.001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
38.Costa L, Avataneo M, Bracco P, Brunella V. 2002. Char formation in polyvinyl polymers I. Polyvinyl acetate. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 77, 503–510. ( 10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00108-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
39.Cuhadar C. 2005. Production and characterization of activated carbon from hazelnut shell and hazelnut husk. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University. [Google Scholar]
40.Lee SY, Park SJ. 2013. Determination of the optimal pore size for improved CO₂ adsorption in activated carbon fibers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 389, 230–235. ( 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.09.018) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Huang PH, Cheng HH, Lin SH. 2015. Adsorption of carbon dioxide onto activated carbon prepared from coconut shells. J. Chem. 2015, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
42.Hutchins RA. 1973. Economic factors in granular carbon thermal regeneration. Chem. Eng. Prog. 69, 48–55. [Google Scholar]
43.Hu X, Radosz M, Cychosz KA, Thommes M. 2011. CO₂-filling capacity and selectivity of carbon nanopores: synthesis, texture, and pore-size distribution from quenched-solid density functional theory (QSDFT). Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 7068–7074. ( 10.1021/es200782s) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Gottipati R. 2012. Preparation and characterization of microporous activated carbon from biomass and its application in the removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous phase. Odisha, India: National Institute of Technology Rourkela. [Google Scholar]
45.Olawale AS, Ajayi OA. 2009. Thermal activation of Canarium Schweinfhurthi nutshell. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 3, 3801–3807. [Google Scholar]
46.Bikshapathi M, Verma N, Singh RK, Joshi HC, Srivastava A. 2011. Preparation of activated carbon fibers from cost effective commercial textile grade acrylic fibers. Carbon Lett. 12, 44–47. ( 10.5714/CL.2011.12.1.044) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
47.Gratuito MKB, Panyathanmaporn T, Chumnanklang R. 2008. Production of activated carbon from coconut shell: optimization using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 4887–4895. ( 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.042) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Bohli T, Ouederni A. 2016. Improvement of oxygen-containing functional groups on olive stones activated carbon by ozone and nitric acid for heavy metals removal from aqueous phase. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 15 852–15 861. ( 10.1007/s11356-015-4330-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Shafeeyan MS, Daud WM, Houshmand A, Arami-Niya A. 2011. Ammonia modification of activated carbon to enhance carbon dioxide adsorption: effect of pre-oxidation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 3936–3942. ( 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.127) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
50.Jansen RJJ, van Bekkum H. 1994. Amination and ammoxidation of activated carbons. Carbon NY 32, 1507–1516. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(94)90146-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
51.Stöhr B, Boehm HP, Schlögl R. 1991. Enhancement of the catalytic activity of activated carbons in oxidation reactions by thermal treatment with ammonia or hydrogen cyanide and observation of a superoxide species as a possible intermediate. Carbon NY 29, 707–720. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(91)90006-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
52.Abechi SE, Gimba CE, Uzairu A, Dallatu YA. 2013. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from palm kernel shell by chemical activation. Res. J. Chem. Sci. 3, 54–61. [Google Scholar]
53.Wafti NSA, Harrison LLN, Loh SK, Astimar AA, Zulkifli AR, Choo YM. 2017. Activated carbon from oil palm biomass as potential adsorbent for palm oil mill effluent treatment. J. Oil Palm Res. 29, 278–290. ( 10.21894/jopr.2017.2902.12) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
54.De Gisi S, Lofrano G, Grassi M, Notarnicola M. 2016. Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: a review. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 9, 10–40. ( 10.1016/j.susmat.2016.06.002) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
55.Guan BTH, Latif PA, Yap TY. 2013. Physical preparation of activated carbon from sugarcane bagasse and corn husk and its physical and chemical characteristics. Int. J. Eng. Res. Sci. Technol. 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
56.Bouchelta C, Salah Medjram M, Bertrand O, Bellat JP. 2008. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from date stones by physical activation with steam. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 82, 70–77. ( 10.1016/j.jaap.2007.12.009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
57.Smíšek M, Černý S. 1970. Active carbon: manufacture, properties and applications. New York, NY: Elsevier Publishing Company. [Google Scholar]
58.El-Hendawy AN, Alexander AJ, Andrews RJ, Forrest G. 2008. Effects of activation schemes on porous, surface and thermal properties of activated carbons prepared from cotton stalks. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 82, 272–278. ( 10.1016/j.jaap.2008.04.006) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
59.Jung S, Oh S, Choi G, Kim J. 2014. Production and characterization of microporous activated carbons and metallurgical bio-coke from waste shell biomass. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 109, 123–131. ( 10.1016/j.jaap.2014.07.003) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
60.Savova D, Apak E, Ekinci E, Yardim F, Petrov N, Budinova T, Razvigorova M, Minkova V. 2001. Biomass conversion to carbon adsorbents and gas. Biomass Bioenergy 21, 133–142. ( 10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00027-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
61.Razali WAW, Baharuddin AS, Tarmezee Talib A, Sulaiman A, Naim MN, Hassan MA, Shirai Y. 2012. Degradation of oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFB) fibre during composting process using in-vessel composter. BioResources 7, 4786–4805. ( 10.15376/biores.7.4.4786-4805) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
62.del Campo BG. 2015. Production of activated carbon from fast pyrolysis biochar and the detoxification of pyrolytic sugars for ethanol fermentation. Ames, IA: Iowa State University. [Google Scholar]
63.Sylvia N, Hakim L, Fardian N, Yunardi. 2018. Adsorption performance of fixed-bed column for the removal of Fe (II) in groundwater using activated carbon made from palm kernel shells. In 3rd Int. Conf. on Chemical Engineering Sciences and Applications 2017 (3rd ICChESA 2017), 20–21 September, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, pp. 1–9. IOP Publishing Ltd; ( 10.1088/1757-899X/334/1/012030) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
64.Shinogi Y, Kanri Y. 2003. Pyrolysis of plant, animal and human waste: physical and chemical characterization of the pyrolytic products. Bioresour. Technol. 90, 241–247. ( 10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00147-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.Tan IA, Ahmad AL, Hameed BH. 2008. Preparation of activated carbon from coconut husk: optimization study on removal of 2, 4, 6-trichlorophenol using response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 153, 709–717. ( 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.Supriya S, Palanisamy PN, Shanthi P. 2014. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from Casuarina for the removal of dyes from textile wastewater. Int. J. ChemTech. Res. 6, 3635–3641. [Google Scholar]
67.Lu K, Lee W, Chen W, Liu S, Lin T. 2012. Torrefaction and low temperature carbonization of oil palm fiber and eucalyptus in nitrogen and air atmospheres. Bioresour. Technol. 123, 98–105. ( 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.096) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Salgado MDF, Abioye AM, Junoh MM, Santos JAP, Ani FN. 2018. Preparation of activated carbon from babassu endocarpunder microwave radiation by physical activation. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 105, 1–13. ( 10.1088/1755-1315/105/1/012116) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
69.Wu SH, Pendleton P. 2001. Adsorption of anionic surfactant by activated carbon: effect of surface chemistry, ionic strength, and hydrophobicity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 243, 306–315. ( 10.1006/jcis.2001.7905) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
70.Pendleton P, Wu SH, Badalyan A. 2002. Activated carbon oxygen content influence on water and surfactant adsorption. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 246, 235–240. ( 10.1006/jcis.2001.8052) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71.Coates J. 2006. Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach. Encycl. Anal. Chem. 12, 10 815–10 837. ( 10.1002/9780470027318.a5606) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
72.Delgado JL, Bouit PA, Filippone S, Herranz MÁ, Martín N. 2010. Organic photovoltaics: a chemical approach. Chem. Commun. 46, 4853–4865. ( 10.1039/c003088k) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73.Meier MS, Andrews R, Jacques D, Cassity KB, Qian D. 2008. Tearing open nitrogen-doped multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem. 18, 4143–4145. ( 10.1039/b809348b) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
74.Ozaki JI, Tanifuji SI, Kimura N, Furuichi A, Oya A. 2006. Enhancement of oxygen reduction activity by carbonization of furan resin in the presence of phthalocyanines. Carbon NY 44, 1324–1326. ( 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.12.026) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
75.Shen W, Fan W. 2013. Nitrogen-containing porous carbons: synthesis and application. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 999–1013. ( 10.1039/c2ta00028h) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
76.Klasson KT, Wartelle LH, Rodgers JE, Lima IM. 2009. Copper(II) adsorption by activated carbons from pecan shells: effect of oxygen level during activation. Ind. Crops Prod. 30, 72–77. ( 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.01.007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
77.Anisuzzaman SM, Joseph CG, Taufiq-Yap YH, Krishnaiah D, Tay VV. 2015. Modification of commercial activated carbon for the removal of 2,4-dichlorophenol from simulated wastewater. J. King Saud. Univ. Sci. 27, 318–330. ( 10.1016/j.jksus.2015.01.002) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
78.Foo KY, Hameed BH. 2009. Utilization of biodiesel waste as a renewable resource for activated carbon: application to environmental problems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 2495–2504. ( 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
79.Jia Y. F., Thomas KM. 2000. Adsorption of cadmium ions on oxygen surface sites in activated carbon. Langmuir 16, 1114–1122. ( 10.1021/la990436w) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
80.Deng L, Lu B, Li J, Lv G, Du S, Shi J, Yang Y. 2017. Effect of pore structure and oxygen-containing groups on adsorption of dibenzothiophene over activated carbon. Fuel 200, 54–61. ( 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.018) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
81.Bardestani R, Kaliaguine S. 2018. Steam activation and mild air oxidation of vacuum pyrolysis biochar. Biomass Bioenergy 108, 101–112. ( 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.011) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
82.Li M, Yu C, Hu C, Zhao C, Zhang M, Ding Y, Wang X, Qiu J. 2018. Template-free synthesis of interconnected carbon nanosheets via cross-linking coupled with annealing for high-efficiency triiodide reduction. RSC Adv. 20, 250–254. ( 10.1039/C7GC02701 J) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
83.Biniak S, Szymański G, Siedlewski J, Świątkowski A. 1997. The characterization of activated carbons with oxygen and nitrogen surface groups. Carbon NY 35, 1799–1810. ( 10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00096-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
84.Bansal RC, Goyal M. 2005. Activated carbon adsorption. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
85.Shen W, Li Z, Liu Y. 2008. Surface chemical functional groups modification of porous carbon. Recent Patents Chem. Eng. 1, 27–40. ( 10.2174/2211334710801010027) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
86.Figueiredo JL, Pereira MFR. 2010. The role of surface chemistry in catalysis with carbons. Catal. Today 150, 2–7. ( 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.04.010) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
87.Hotova G, Slovak V, Soares OSGP, Figueiredo JL, Pereira MFR. 2018. Oxygen surface groups analysis of carbonaceous samples pyrolysed at low temperature. Carbon NY 134, 255–263. ( 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.067) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
88.Kim J-M, Song I-S, Cho D, Hong I. 2011. Effect of carbonization temperature and chemical pre-treatment on the thermal change and fiber morphology of kenaf-based carbon fibers. Carbon Lett. 12, 131–137. ( 10.5714/CL.2011.12.3.131) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
89.Lee, et al. 2018. Data from: Production of bioadsorbent from phosphoric acid pretreated palm kernel shell and coconut shell by two-stage continuous physical activation via N₂ and air Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.ch8gf53) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

Lee, et al. 2018. Data from: Production of bioadsorbent from phosphoric acid pretreated palm kernel shell and coconut shell by two-stage continuous physical activation via N₂ and air Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.ch8gf53) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Data Availability Statement

Adsorption properties; BET surface area; N₂ adsorption; FTIR and TGA files have been uploaded to the Dryad Digital Repository at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.ch8gf53 [89].

[RSOS180775C1] 1.Kundu A, Gupta BS, Hashim MA, Sahu JN, Mujawar M, Redzwan G. 2015. Optimisation of the process variables in production of activated carbon by microwave heating. RSC Adv. 5, 35 899– 35 908. ( 10.1039/C4RA16900J) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C2] 2.Abood MM, Rajendiran J, Azhari NN. 2015. Agricultural waste as low cost adsorbent for the removal of Fe (II) ions from aqueous solution. Infrastruct. Univ. Kuala Lumpur Res. J. 3, 29–39. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C3] 3.Abdel-Ghani NT, Hefny M, El-Chaghaby GAF. 2007. Removal of lead from aqueous solution using low cost abundantly available adsorbents. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 4, 67–73. ( 10.1007/BF03325963) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C4] 4.Rahman MM, Adil M, Yusof AM, Kamaruzzaman YB, Ansary RH. 2014. Removal of heavy ions with acid activated carbons derived from oil palm and coconut shell. Material 7, 3634–3650. ( 10.3390/ma7053634) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C5] 5.Ioannidou O, Zabaniotou A. 2007. Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production—a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11, 1966–2005. ( 10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.013) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C6] 6.Olivares-Marín M, Fernández-González C, MacÍas-García A, Gómez-Serrano V. 2012. Preparation of activated carbon from cherry stones by physical activation in air. Influence of the chemical carbonisation with H₂SO₄. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 94, 131–137. ( 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.11.019) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C7] 7.Hong J, Xiaomin W, Zhengrong G. 2013. Hierarchical carbon materials from high ash bio-char of distiller's dried grain with solubles for supercapacitor. Mater. Focus 2, 105–112. ( 10.1166/mat.2013.1059) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C8] 8.Brewer CE, Unger R, Schmidt-Rohr K, Brown RC. 2011. Criteria to select biochars for field studies based on biochar chemical properties. Bioenergy Res. 4, 312–323. ( 10.1007/s12155-011-9133-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C9] 9.Molina-Sabio M, Rodríguez-Reinoso F. 2004. Role of chemical activation in the development of carbon porosity. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 241, 15–25. ( 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C10] 10.Nahil MA, Williams PT. 2012. Characterisation of activated carbons with high surface area and variable porosity produced from agricultural cotton waste by chemical activation and co-activation. Waste Biomass Valorization 3, 117–130. ( 10.1007/s12649-012-9109-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C11] 11.Xiao F, Pignatello JJ. 2016. Effects of post-pyrolysis air oxidation of biomass chars on adsorption of neutral and ionizable compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 6276–6283. ( 10.1021/acs.est.6b00362) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C12] 12.Ahmadpour A, Do DD. 1996. The preparation of active carbons from coal by chemical and physical activation. Carbon NY 34, 471–479. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00204-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C13] 13.Ahmadpour A, Do DD. 1997. The preparation of activated carbon from macadamia nutshell by chemical activation. Carbon NY 35, 1723–1732. ( 10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00127-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C14] 14.Caturla F, Molina-Sabio M, Rodríguez-Reinoso F. 1991. Preparation of activated carbon by chemical activation with ZnCl₂. Carbon NY 29, 999–1007. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(91)90179-M) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C15] 15.Hu Z, Srinivasan M. 1999. Preparation of high-surface-area activated carbon from coconut shell. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 27, 11–18. ( 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.03.059) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C16] 16.Laine J, Calafat A. 1989. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from coconut shell impregnated with phosphoric acid. Carbon NY 27, 191–195. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(89)90123-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C17] 17.Lua AC, Yang T. 2005. Characteristics of activated carbon prepared from pistachio-nut shell by zinc chloride activation under nitrogen and vacuum conditions. Colloid Interface Sci. 290, 505–513. ( 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.04.063) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C18] 18.Molina-Sabio M, Rodríguez-Reinoso F, Caturla F, Sellés MJ. 1996. Development of porosity in combined phosphoric acid-carbon dioxide activation. Carbon NY 34, 457–462. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00209-X) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C19] 19.Otowa T, Nojima Y, Miyazaki T. 1997. Development of KOH activated high surface area carbon and its application to drinking water purification. Carbon NY 35, 1315–1319. ( 10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00076-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C20] 20.Rodríguez-Reinoso F, Molina-Sabio M. 1992. Activated carbons from lignocellulosic materials by chemical and/or physical activation: an overview. Carbon NY 30, 1111–1118. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(92)90143-K) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C21] 21.Rwayhah YM, Hassan M, Shehata M. 2017. Nanoporous activated carbon from olive stones wastes. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 76, 725–732. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C22] 22.Kohls DJ, Beaucage G. 2002. Rational design of reinforced rubber. Solid State Mater. Sci. 6, 183–194. ( 10.1016/S1359-0286(02)00073-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C23] 23.Vernersson T, Bonelli PR, Cerrela EG, Cukierman AL. 2002. Arundo donax cane as a precursor for activated carbons preparation by phosphoric acid activation. Bioresour. Technol. 83, 95–104. ( 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00205-X) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C24] 24.Mahinpey N, Murugan P, Mani T, Raina R. 2009. Analysis of bio-oil, biogas, and biochar from pressurized pyrolysis of wheat straw using a tubular reactor. Energy Fuels 23, 2736–2742. ( 10.1021/ef8010959) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C25] 25.Hung JJ. 2012. The production of activated carbon from coconut shells using pyrolysis and fluidized bed reactors. University of Arizona; See http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/243968/1/azu_etd_mr_2012_0079_sip1_m.pdf. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C26] 26.Lee CL, H'ng PS, Paridah MT, Chin KL, Khoo PS, Nazrin RAR, Asyikin SN, Mariusz M. 2017. Effect of reaction time and temperature on the properties of carbon black made from palm kernel and coconut shell. Asian J. Sci. Res. 10, 24–33. ( 10.3923/ajsr.2017.Research) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C27] 27.Anonymous. 1992. Japanese Standard Association. Standard testing method of methylene blue number of activated carbon 1470–1991.

[RSOS180775C28] 28.Joshi S, Pokharel BP. 2014. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from Lapsi (Choerospondias axillaris) seed stone by chemical activation with potassium hydroxide. J. Inst. Eng. 9, 79–88. ( 10.3126/jie.v9i1.10673) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C29] 29.Chin KL, H'ng PS, Go WZ, Wong WZ, Lim TW, Maminski M, Paridah MT, Luqman AC. 2013. Optimization of torrefaction conditions for high energy density solid biofuel from oil palm biomass and fast growing species available in Malaysia. Ind. Crops Prod. 49, 768–774. ( 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.06.007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C30] 30.Patnukao P, Pavasant P. 2008. Activated carbon from Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn bark using phosphoric acid activation. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 8540–8543. ( 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.10.049) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C31] 31.Asadullah M, Kabir MS, Ahmed MB, Razak NA, Rasid NSA, Aezzira A. 2013. Role of microporosity and surface functionality of activated carbon in methylene blue dye removal from water. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 30, 2228–2234. ( 10.1007/s11814-013-0172-y) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C32] 32.Liu X, He C, Yu X, Bai Y, Ye L, Wang B, Zhang L. 2018. Net-like porous activated carbon materials from shrimp shell by solution-processed carbonization and H₃PO₄ activation for methylene blue adsorption. Powder Technol. 326, 181–189. ( 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.12.034) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C33] 33.Novais RM, Ascensão G, Tobaldi DM, Seabra MP, Labrincha JA. 2018. Biomass fly ash geopolymer monoliths for effective methylene blue removal from wastewaters. J. Clean Prod. 171, 783–794. ( 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.078) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C34] 34.Babatunde OA, Garba S, Ali ZN. 2016. Surface modification of activated carbon for improved iodine and carbon tetrachloride adsorption. Am. J. Chem. 6, 74–79. ( 10.5923/j.chemistry.20160603.02) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C35] 35.Itodo A, Abdulrahman F, Hassan L, Maigandi S, Itodo H. 2010. Application of methylene blue and iodine adsorption in the measurement of specific surface area by four acid and salt treated activated carbons. New York Sci. J. 3, 25–33. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C36] 36.Kyritsis S. 2001. 1st world conference on biomass for energy and industry. II. Sevilla, Spain: James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C37] 37.Montes V, Hill JM. 2018. Pore enlargement of carbonaceous materials by metal oxide catalysts in the presence of steam: influence of metal oxide size and porosity of starting material. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 256, 91–101. ( 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.08.001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C38] 38.Costa L, Avataneo M, Bracco P, Brunella V. 2002. Char formation in polyvinyl polymers I. Polyvinyl acetate. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 77, 503–510. ( 10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00108-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C39] 39.Cuhadar C. 2005. Production and characterization of activated carbon from hazelnut shell and hazelnut husk. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C40] 40.Lee SY, Park SJ. 2013. Determination of the optimal pore size for improved CO₂ adsorption in activated carbon fibers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 389, 230–235. ( 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.09.018) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C41] 41.Huang PH, Cheng HH, Lin SH. 2015. Adsorption of carbon dioxide onto activated carbon prepared from coconut shells. J. Chem. 2015, 1–10. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C42] 42.Hutchins RA. 1973. Economic factors in granular carbon thermal regeneration. Chem. Eng. Prog. 69, 48–55. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C43] 43.Hu X, Radosz M, Cychosz KA, Thommes M. 2011. CO₂-filling capacity and selectivity of carbon nanopores: synthesis, texture, and pore-size distribution from quenched-solid density functional theory (QSDFT). Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 7068–7074. ( 10.1021/es200782s) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C44] 44.Gottipati R. 2012. Preparation and characterization of microporous activated carbon from biomass and its application in the removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous phase. Odisha, India: National Institute of Technology Rourkela. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C45] 45.Olawale AS, Ajayi OA. 2009. Thermal activation of Canarium Schweinfhurthi nutshell. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 3, 3801–3807. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C46] 46.Bikshapathi M, Verma N, Singh RK, Joshi HC, Srivastava A. 2011. Preparation of activated carbon fibers from cost effective commercial textile grade acrylic fibers. Carbon Lett. 12, 44–47. ( 10.5714/CL.2011.12.1.044) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C47] 47.Gratuito MKB, Panyathanmaporn T, Chumnanklang R. 2008. Production of activated carbon from coconut shell: optimization using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 4887–4895. ( 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.042) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C48] 48.Bohli T, Ouederni A. 2016. Improvement of oxygen-containing functional groups on olive stones activated carbon by ozone and nitric acid for heavy metals removal from aqueous phase. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 15 852–15 861. ( 10.1007/s11356-015-4330-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C49] 49.Shafeeyan MS, Daud WM, Houshmand A, Arami-Niya A. 2011. Ammonia modification of activated carbon to enhance carbon dioxide adsorption: effect of pre-oxidation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 3936–3942. ( 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.11.127) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C50] 50.Jansen RJJ, van Bekkum H. 1994. Amination and ammoxidation of activated carbons. Carbon NY 32, 1507–1516. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(94)90146-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C51] 51.Stöhr B, Boehm HP, Schlögl R. 1991. Enhancement of the catalytic activity of activated carbons in oxidation reactions by thermal treatment with ammonia or hydrogen cyanide and observation of a superoxide species as a possible intermediate. Carbon NY 29, 707–720. ( 10.1016/0008-6223(91)90006-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C52] 52.Abechi SE, Gimba CE, Uzairu A, Dallatu YA. 2013. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from palm kernel shell by chemical activation. Res. J. Chem. Sci. 3, 54–61. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C53] 53.Wafti NSA, Harrison LLN, Loh SK, Astimar AA, Zulkifli AR, Choo YM. 2017. Activated carbon from oil palm biomass as potential adsorbent for palm oil mill effluent treatment. J. Oil Palm Res. 29, 278–290. ( 10.21894/jopr.2017.2902.12) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C54] 54.De Gisi S, Lofrano G, Grassi M, Notarnicola M. 2016. Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: a review. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 9, 10–40. ( 10.1016/j.susmat.2016.06.002) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C55] 55.Guan BTH, Latif PA, Yap TY. 2013. Physical preparation of activated carbon from sugarcane bagasse and corn husk and its physical and chemical characteristics. Int. J. Eng. Res. Sci. Technol. 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C56] 56.Bouchelta C, Salah Medjram M, Bertrand O, Bellat JP. 2008. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from date stones by physical activation with steam. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 82, 70–77. ( 10.1016/j.jaap.2007.12.009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C57] 57.Smíšek M, Černý S. 1970. Active carbon: manufacture, properties and applications. New York, NY: Elsevier Publishing Company. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C58] 58.El-Hendawy AN, Alexander AJ, Andrews RJ, Forrest G. 2008. Effects of activation schemes on porous, surface and thermal properties of activated carbons prepared from cotton stalks. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 82, 272–278. ( 10.1016/j.jaap.2008.04.006) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C59] 59.Jung S, Oh S, Choi G, Kim J. 2014. Production and characterization of microporous activated carbons and metallurgical bio-coke from waste shell biomass. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 109, 123–131. ( 10.1016/j.jaap.2014.07.003) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C60] 60.Savova D, Apak E, Ekinci E, Yardim F, Petrov N, Budinova T, Razvigorova M, Minkova V. 2001. Biomass conversion to carbon adsorbents and gas. Biomass Bioenergy 21, 133–142. ( 10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00027-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C61] 61.Razali WAW, Baharuddin AS, Tarmezee Talib A, Sulaiman A, Naim MN, Hassan MA, Shirai Y. 2012. Degradation of oil palm empty fruit bunches (OPEFB) fibre during composting process using in-vessel composter. BioResources 7, 4786–4805. ( 10.15376/biores.7.4.4786-4805) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C62] 62.del Campo BG. 2015. Production of activated carbon from fast pyrolysis biochar and the detoxification of pyrolytic sugars for ethanol fermentation. Ames, IA: Iowa State University. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C63] 63.Sylvia N, Hakim L, Fardian N, Yunardi. 2018. Adsorption performance of fixed-bed column for the removal of Fe (II) in groundwater using activated carbon made from palm kernel shells. In 3rd Int. Conf. on Chemical Engineering Sciences and Applications 2017 (3rd ICChESA 2017), 20–21 September, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, pp. 1–9. IOP Publishing Ltd; ( 10.1088/1757-899X/334/1/012030) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C64] 64.Shinogi Y, Kanri Y. 2003. Pyrolysis of plant, animal and human waste: physical and chemical characterization of the pyrolytic products. Bioresour. Technol. 90, 241–247. ( 10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00147-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C65] 65.Tan IA, Ahmad AL, Hameed BH. 2008. Preparation of activated carbon from coconut husk: optimization study on removal of 2, 4, 6-trichlorophenol using response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 153, 709–717. ( 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C66] 66.Supriya S, Palanisamy PN, Shanthi P. 2014. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from Casuarina for the removal of dyes from textile wastewater. Int. J. ChemTech. Res. 6, 3635–3641. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C67] 67.Lu K, Lee W, Chen W, Liu S, Lin T. 2012. Torrefaction and low temperature carbonization of oil palm fiber and eucalyptus in nitrogen and air atmospheres. Bioresour. Technol. 123, 98–105. ( 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.096) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C68] 68.Salgado MDF, Abioye AM, Junoh MM, Santos JAP, Ani FN. 2018. Preparation of activated carbon from babassu endocarpunder microwave radiation by physical activation. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 105, 1–13. ( 10.1088/1755-1315/105/1/012116) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C69] 69.Wu SH, Pendleton P. 2001. Adsorption of anionic surfactant by activated carbon: effect of surface chemistry, ionic strength, and hydrophobicity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 243, 306–315. ( 10.1006/jcis.2001.7905) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C70] 70.Pendleton P, Wu SH, Badalyan A. 2002. Activated carbon oxygen content influence on water and surfactant adsorption. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 246, 235–240. ( 10.1006/jcis.2001.8052) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C71] 71.Coates J. 2006. Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach. Encycl. Anal. Chem. 12, 10 815–10 837. ( 10.1002/9780470027318.a5606) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C72] 72.Delgado JL, Bouit PA, Filippone S, Herranz MÁ, Martín N. 2010. Organic photovoltaics: a chemical approach. Chem. Commun. 46, 4853–4865. ( 10.1039/c003088k) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C73] 73.Meier MS, Andrews R, Jacques D, Cassity KB, Qian D. 2008. Tearing open nitrogen-doped multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem. 18, 4143–4145. ( 10.1039/b809348b) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C74] 74.Ozaki JI, Tanifuji SI, Kimura N, Furuichi A, Oya A. 2006. Enhancement of oxygen reduction activity by carbonization of furan resin in the presence of phthalocyanines. Carbon NY 44, 1324–1326. ( 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.12.026) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C75] 75.Shen W, Fan W. 2013. Nitrogen-containing porous carbons: synthesis and application. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 999–1013. ( 10.1039/c2ta00028h) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C76] 76.Klasson KT, Wartelle LH, Rodgers JE, Lima IM. 2009. Copper(II) adsorption by activated carbons from pecan shells: effect of oxygen level during activation. Ind. Crops Prod. 30, 72–77. ( 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.01.007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C77] 77.Anisuzzaman SM, Joseph CG, Taufiq-Yap YH, Krishnaiah D, Tay VV. 2015. Modification of commercial activated carbon for the removal of 2,4-dichlorophenol from simulated wastewater. J. King Saud. Univ. Sci. 27, 318–330. ( 10.1016/j.jksus.2015.01.002) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C78] 78.Foo KY, Hameed BH. 2009. Utilization of biodiesel waste as a renewable resource for activated carbon: application to environmental problems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 2495–2504. ( 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C79] 79.Jia Y. F., Thomas KM. 2000. Adsorption of cadmium ions on oxygen surface sites in activated carbon. Langmuir 16, 1114–1122. ( 10.1021/la990436w) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C80] 80.Deng L, Lu B, Li J, Lv G, Du S, Shi J, Yang Y. 2017. Effect of pore structure and oxygen-containing groups on adsorption of dibenzothiophene over activated carbon. Fuel 200, 54–61. ( 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.018) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C81] 81.Bardestani R, Kaliaguine S. 2018. Steam activation and mild air oxidation of vacuum pyrolysis biochar. Biomass Bioenergy 108, 101–112. ( 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.011) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C82] 82.Li M, Yu C, Hu C, Zhao C, Zhang M, Ding Y, Wang X, Qiu J. 2018. Template-free synthesis of interconnected carbon nanosheets via cross-linking coupled with annealing for high-efficiency triiodide reduction. RSC Adv. 20, 250–254. ( 10.1039/C7GC02701 J) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C83] 83.Biniak S, Szymański G, Siedlewski J, Świątkowski A. 1997. The characterization of activated carbons with oxygen and nitrogen surface groups. Carbon NY 35, 1799–1810. ( 10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00096-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C84] 84.Bansal RC, Goyal M. 2005. Activated carbon adsorption. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C85] 85.Shen W, Li Z, Liu Y. 2008. Surface chemical functional groups modification of porous carbon. Recent Patents Chem. Eng. 1, 27–40. ( 10.2174/2211334710801010027) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C86] 86.Figueiredo JL, Pereira MFR. 2010. The role of surface chemistry in catalysis with carbons. Catal. Today 150, 2–7. ( 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.04.010) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C87] 87.Hotova G, Slovak V, Soares OSGP, Figueiredo JL, Pereira MFR. 2018. Oxygen surface groups analysis of carbonaceous samples pyrolysed at low temperature. Carbon NY 134, 255–263. ( 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.067) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C88] 88.Kim J-M, Song I-S, Cho D, Hong I. 2011. Effect of carbonization temperature and chemical pre-treatment on the thermal change and fiber morphology of kenaf-based carbon fibers. Carbon Lett. 12, 131–137. ( 10.5714/CL.2011.12.3.131) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[RSOS180775C89] 89.Lee, et al. 2018. Data from: Production of bioadsorbent from phosphoric acid pretreated palm kernel shell and coconut shell by two-stage continuous physical activation via N₂ and air Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.ch8gf53) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

PERMALINK

Production of bioadsorbent from phosphoric acid pretreated palm kernel shell and coconut shell by two-stage continuous physical activation via N2 and air

Chuan Li Lee

Paik San H'ng

Md Tahir Paridah

Kit Ling Chin

Umer Rashid

Mariusz Maminski

Wen Ze Go

Raja Ahamd Raja Nazrin

Siti Nurul Asyikin Rosli

Pui San Khoo

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Material and methods

2.1. Preparation of samples prior to physical activation (H3PO4 pretreatment)

2.2. Physical activation process

2.3. Characterization

2.4. Data analysis

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Adsorption properties of bioadsorbent

Table 1.

3.2. Pore structure and surface area characteristics (BET surface area)

Table 2.

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 5.

Table 3.

3.3. N2 adsorption

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

3.4. Scanning electron micrograph

3.5. CHNS/O and ash content

Table 4.

3.6. FTIR

Figure 6.

3.7. TGA

Figure 7.

4. Conclusion

Acknowledgements

Data accessibility

Authors' contributions

Competing interests

Funding

References

Associated Data

Data Citations

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases

Production of bioadsorbent from phosphoric acid pretreated palm kernel shell and coconut shell by two-stage continuous physical activation via N₂ and air

2.1. Preparation of samples prior to physical activation (H₃PO₄ pretreatment)

3.3. N₂ adsorption