Abstract
Optic pathway glioma (OPG) presents in childhood and can cause significant morbidity and visual loss. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the current imaging modality of choice for evaluation of OPG progression, but it is a relatively limited resource often requiring sedation in the pediatric age group. Additionally, OPG progression on MRI does not always correlate with clinical progression. As a result, several other modalities for evaluating OPG are being investigated, including optical coherence tomography (OCT), a readily available imaging technique in ophthalmic practice. The purpose of the present study was to examine the association between retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measured using OCT and optic nerve function in children with OPG with and without neurofibromatosis-1 (NF-1). A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify children diagnosed with OPG from 2001 to 2015 at a tertiary pediatric medical center. The correlation between OCT measurements and clinical visual parameters was statistically analyzed. Included were 23 children with imaging-confirmed OPG and spectral domain OCT: 10 with NF-1 (mean age at diagnosis 5.8 years) and 13 without (mean age at diagnosis 5.9 years). The glioma involved the chiasma-hypothalamus in 19 patients, optic nerve in 11, and optic tract in 7; more than one anatomic site was affected in 15. Symptoms were reported in 2 patients with NF-1 and most patients without NF-1. Visual field defects included monocular, bitemporal, nasal, and homonymous hemianopia. Initial mean RNFL was 85.4 μm in the NF-1 group and 65 μm in the non-NF-1 group. Visual acuity deteriorated in 1/10 patients and 5/13 patients, respectively. Repeated OCT showed continued RNFL thinning in 3 patients (5 eyes) in the NF-1 group and in 8 patients (11 eyes) in the non-NF-1 group, often associated with a decrease in optic nerve function. In conclusion, visual function in children with OPG is correlated with repeated OCT measurements and weakly with neuroimaging. Children without NF-1 are usually symptomatic and have a worse clinical outcome. These findings may have important implications when considering initiating, continuing or stopping chemotherapy for OPG. The application of OCT in the assessment of OPG and the correlation of the findings to clinical progression can have a significant impact on OPG patient management.
Keywords: optic pathway glioma, children, optical coherence tomography, OCT, neurofibromatosis 1, non-NF1
Introduction
Optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) are histologically low-grade pilocytic astrocytomas which tend to appear in the first year of life. Many show prolonged indolent phases; spontaneous tumor regression has been documented as well (1–3). In rare cases, malignant astrocytomas may involve the anterior visual system (4). Although OPGs are usually associated with a high survival rate (5), they pose a high risk of significant morbidity and visual loss over time.
At diagnosis of OPG, visual function ranges from good to poor (6, 7). The clinical presentation usually correlates with the anatomic location (8) and size of the tumor (8, 9). Because monocular visual loss is not often diagnosed immediately, especially in children, the findings leading to diagnosis are usually proptosis or lack of stereopsis as well as failure on routine vision screening (9). Strabismus may also be a presenting sign (10). In patients with reduced vision, fundus examination may identify optic pallor (11).
The presence of neurofibromatosis-1 (NF-1) is a risk factor for the development of OPG (12, 13). Children with NF-1 are predisposed to the development of OPGs (14) at reported rates of 8–31% (5, 15, 16), and they are usually screened clinically (not radiologically) for OPGs on an annual basis. This is important because unlike children without NF-1, children with NF-1 are usually asymptomatic. The course of sporadic OPGs is more severe than NF-1-associated OPGs (14, 17), with more significant deterioration of vision (15).
Previous studies of treatment outcomes of OPG have focused mainly on changes in tumor size or patient survival, with treatment limited to patients exhibiting tumor growth on imaging or severe clinical symptoms, as estimated by clinical examination or visual evoked potentials (17). However, treatment to reduce tumor size does not necessarily affect visual function, and only recently has preservation of vision become a primary treatment objective (18–21). This has created a need to reliably follow changes in visual function in the pediatric population.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a noninvasive interferometry-based ocular imaging technique. By measuring the backscatter of infrared light, the device generates high-resolution (within 4microns) cross-sectional images of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) (22). It is a useful tool for following thinning of the RNFL around the disc. Data on the value of OCT measurements in children with OPG, with or without NF-1, are limited. Several studies have investigated OCT-based parameters such as RNFL thickness and ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer thickness in children with OPG in terms of the correlation of longitudinal changes over time and visual acuity (23–31). Others compared RNFL changes with OPG tumor size (32). However, none of the previous studies compared sporadic and NF1-associated OPGs, combined with the radiological findings and the clinical and OCT-based findings.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate RNFL thickness in children with and without NF-1 who were diagnosed with OPG and to analyze the association of anatomical structural changes in tumor size and RNFL thickness with clinical changes in optic nerve function.
Methods
A retrospective comparative cohort study design was used. The clinical database of the neurology and ophthalmology clinics of a tertiary university-affiliated pediatric medical center was reviewed for all children (age up to 18 years) with or without NF-1 who were diagnosed with OPG from 2001 through 2015 and underwent at least one spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) scan of the optic nerve. The diagnosis of OPG in our departments is based on clinical as well as neuroimaging findings.
Data on demographic parameters, age at initial presentation, presenting symptoms, and signs, and visual function were derived from the medical files. Parameters of visual function were visual acuity, color vision (with Ishihara color plates), relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD), and optic disc appearance. Visual acuity was measured for each eye separately and converted to logMAR units and categorized as normal (logMAR ≤ 0.3, equivalent to 20/40), moderate (logMAR > 0.3 and < 1.0), poor (logMAR ≥ 1.0, equivalent to 20/200), or no light perception (NLP). In the youngest patients, visual acuity was categorized as presence or absence of fix- and-follow. Optic disc appearance was categorized as normal, optic disc pallor (unhealthy pale appearance of the optic disc), or disc atrophy (clinically noticeable tissue loss at the optic disc). Findings for visual field test (confrontation for children under age 5 years, computerized for older children) were categorized as left/right monocular, temporal, or homonymous loss. In addition, the neuroimaging scans of all eligible patients were reviewed to identify the presence, location, and size of the tumor at diagnosis and follow-up, and the data were recorded. OCT was introduced in our center in 2007 for use in children who were able to cooperate. Some of the initial scans were performed with time domain (TD) technology (Stratus OCT, version 4.0.1, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) which was the standard in clinical practice at the time. Later scans were performed with a spectral domain (SD) OCT (Cirrus 4000, Carl Zeiss Meditec) which provides higher quality scans and has become the standard in recent years. In the present study, only the SD-OCT scans were included in the final analysis; all were performed with the same SD-OCT machine and by the same operator. The findings were analyzed for the whole cohort, for patients with and without NF-1, and over time.
Statistical Analysis
Differences between groups in visual fields abnormalities, OCT results, and optic disc appearance were analyzed by Fisher's Exact Test, due to the small sample size. Spearman correlation was used to analyze the relationship between RNFL thickness and visual acuity, color vision, visual fields, or optic disc appearance. Non-parametric Wilcoxon was used to evaluate the effect of OPG location on RNFL thickness. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.
Results
Of the 59 patients with OPGs who attended the neurology and ophthalmology clinics of our medical center during the study period, 23 met the study criteria:10 with NF-1 (6 boys, 4 girls) and 13 without NF-1 (8 boys, 5 girls). Their characteristics are shown in Table 1. Mean age at diagnosis of OPG was 5.8 years in the NF-1 group (range 3–10 years) and 5.9 years (range 0.8–18) in the non-NF-1 group. In the NF-1 group, OPG was detected mostly by routine imaging conducted during routine follow up. One patient presented with proptosis and another with optic nerve pallor noted on routine screening. In the non-NF-1 group, the diagnosis was suspected on the basis of symptoms and signs in most patients. These included visual disturbances, headaches, hypothalamic obesity, proptosis, nystagmus, and strabismus. In the NF-1 group, the tumor involved the hypothalamus in 4 patients (40%), optic chiasma in 7 (70%), optic tract in 4 (40%), and optic nerve in 8 (80%). In the non-NF-1 group, the tumor involved the hypothalamus in 8 patients (61%), optic chiasma in 8 (61%), optic tract in 3 (23%), and optic nerve in 3 (23%). More than one anatomic location was involved in 7 patients with NF-1 and 8 patients without NF-1. The mean duration of follow-up was 81.6 months in the NF-1 group and 66.5 months in the non-NF-1 group.
Table 1.
Characteristics | NF-1 | Non-NF-1 |
---|---|---|
PATIENTS | ||
Total | 10 | 13 |
Boys | 6 | 8 |
Girls | 4 | 5 |
Age at diagnosis (year), range | 3–10 | 0.8–18 |
Follow-up months, range (mean) | 36–120 (81.6) | 12–96 (66.5) |
PRESENTING SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS | ||
Headache | 0 | 4 |
Vomiting | 0 | 4 |
Visual symptoms | 0 | 7 |
Endocrine abnormalities | 0 | 1 |
Proptosis | 1 | 2 |
Nystagmus | 0 | 2 |
Strabismus | 0 | 3 |
Café au lait spots | 8 | 0 |
Optic nerve pallor | 1 | 0 |
INITIAL VISUAL FIELD (LAST VISUAL FIELD) | ||
Normal | 7 (5) | 2 (0) |
Monocular | 1 (2) | 1 (0) |
Bitemporal | 1 (2) | 2 (2) |
Nasal | 0 (0) | 1 (1) |
Homonymous | 0 (0) | 4 (6) |
INITIAL VISUAL ACUITY (LAST VISUAL ACUITY)† | ||
F+F | 1 (0) | 1 (0) |
Normal | 7 (8) | 4 (4) |
Moderate | 0 (0) | 2 (1) |
Poor | 1 (1) | 4 (4) |
NLP | 1 (1) | 3 (4) |
LOCATION OF GLIOMA | ||
Chiasma-hypothalamus | 7 | 12 |
Optic nerve | 8 | 3 |
Optic tract | 4 | 3 |
Combined | 7 | 8 |
Visual acuity was measured for each eye separately and converted to logMAR units and categorized as normal (logMAR ≤ 0.3, equivalent to 20/40), moderate (logMAR > 0.3 and < 1.0), poor (logMAR ≥ 1.0, equivalent to 20/200), or no light perception (NLP). In the youngest patients, visual acuity was categorized as presence or absence of fix and follow (F+F).
Treatment in all cases was based on the clinical course. Twelve children without NF-1 underwent chemotherapy, often combined with surgical intervention. The one exception was a patient diagnosed at age 18 years who had a stable clinical course following placement of an intraventricular shunt. Only 3 patients in the NF-1 group received chemotherapy during follow-up; none required surgical intervention.
Visual Function
On initial visual field examination of the NF-1 group, 7 patients had normal visual fields, 1 had monocular defects and 1 had a bitemporal defect. One child had NLP at presentation, and therefore no visual field result. In the non-NF-1 group, of the 10 patients for whom data were available, 2 had normal visual fields, 1 monocular defects, 2 temporal defects, 1 nasal defects, and 4 homonymous defects. Three non-NF-1 children had NLP at presentation. At the end of the follow-up, visual fields were normal in 5 eyes in the NF-1 group; the remainder had monocular or temporal defects (2 patients each). One patient had NLP. In the non-NF-1 group, bitemporal defects were found in 2 patients, nasal defects in 1 patient, and homonymous defects in 6 patients. Four patients had NLP.
Findings on initial visual acuity testing were as follows: NF-1 group—good (normal) in 8 patients, poor in 1, and NLP in 1; non-NF-1 group—good in 5 patients, moderate in 2, poor in 4, and NLP in 3. At the end of follow-up, in the NF-1 group, vision was good in 8, moderate in 1 and NLP in 1; findings in the non-NF-1 group were good in 4, and moderate in 1, poor in 4, and NLP in 4. A deterioration in visual acuity was noted in 1/10 patients with NF-1, from 20/320 to hand motion (HM), and 5/13 patients without NF-1. Initial average score on 10-plate Ishihara color vision test was 8.4 in the NF-1 group and 5.9 in the non-NF-1 group. At the end of follow-up, the respective averages were 9.3 and 5.6.
Neuroimaging
On repeated neuroimaging, at the end of the follow-up period, the tumor remained stable in 8 patients in each group, progressed in 2 patients with NF-1 and 3 without NF-1, and regressed in 2 patients, both without NF-1, respectively. One patient without NF-1 and tumor progression had an intralesional hemorrhage.
OCT Scanning
Mean age at the first OCT examination in the NF-1 and non-NF-1 groups was 14.9 years and 12.9 years, respectively. Mean RFNL thickness at the first examination was 85.4 μm in the NF-1 group (data available for 19 eyes) and 65 μm in the non-NF-1 group (data available for 23 eyes), p = 0.0025. At the last follow-up, RNFL measured 72.6 μm in the NF-1 group (data available for 8 eyes) and 60.1 μm in the non-NF-1 group (data available for 21 eyes), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.06).
OCT was repeated in 15 patients, 4 with NF-1 and 11 without NF-1, at a median of 2 years from the first OCT evaluation. Thinning of the RNFL was noted in 3 patients with NF-1 (5 eyes) and 8 patients without (11 eyes). Further analysis of the patients with RNFL thinning revealed clinical deterioration in 2 of the patients with NF-1 and 6 of the patients without non-NF-1. Clinical deterioration occurred at various intervals during the course of follow-up. Tables 2, 3 show the first and last OCT results for each patient alongside the changes in visual function. One representative patient from each group for whom complete data on all evaluations were available are described below.
Table 2.
Pt. no. | RNFL thickness (μm) 1st OCT | RNFL thickness (μm) last OCT | OPG Location | Initial optic nerve function (Last) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ave | SQ | IQ | NQ | TQ | Ave | SQ | IQ | NQ | TQ | VA (LogMar) | Color vision* | RAPD | Disc | VF | |||
1 | RE | 45 | 34 | 52 | 55 | 42 | 38 | 38 | 47 | 35 | 51 | OT, CG | 0.4 (0.6) | 0.0 (0.0) | + (+) | Pale (Pale) | HOMHEM (HOMHEM) |
LE | 55 | 67 | 73 | 43 | 38 | 52 | 64 | 75 | 45 | 29 | 0.2 (0.1) | 1.0 (0.9) | – (–) | Pale (Pale) | HOMHEM (HOMHEM) | ||
2 | RE | 58 | 89 | 47 | 49 | 47 | 70 | 104 | 76 | 48 | 51 | CG | 0.0 (0.0) | YO (10) | – (–) | Normal (Pale) | Normal (Bitemporal) |
LE | – | – | – | – | – | 51 | 53 | 56 | 46 | 48 | 0.0 (1.0) | YO (0) | – (+) | Normal (Pale) | Normal (Bitemporal) | ||
3 | RE | 57 | 73 | 45 | 59 | 54 | – | – | – | – | – | OT, HT | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.6 (0.5) | – (–) | Normal (Pale) | HOMHEM (HOMHEM) |
LE | 68 | 101 | 90 | 39 | 45 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.1 (0.0) | 0.6 (0.5) | – (+) | Atrophy (Atrophy) | HOMHEM (HOMHEM) | ||
4 | RE | 70 | – | – | – | – | 69 | – | – | – | – | ON, CG, HT | NLP (NLP) | YO (0.0) | + (+) | Pale (Atrophy) | YO (None) |
LE | 72 | 99 | 102 | 51 | 35 | 67 | 88 | 93 | 46 | 43 | 0.0 (0.0) | YO (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Pale) | YO (Temporal) | ||
5 | RE | 42 | 37 | 53 | 32 | 46 | 52 | 56 | 53 | 43 | 56 | ON, CG | CF (CF) | 0.0 (0.0) | + (+) | Atrophy (Atrophy) | HOMHEM (HOMHEM) |
LE | 64 | 69 | 105 | 31 | 54 | 64 | 76 | 86 | 41 | 54 | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Pale (Pale) | HOMHEM (HOMHEM) | ||
6 | RE | 48 | 49 | 48 | 56 | 37 | 48 | 44 | 51 | 51 | 47 | CG, HT | 0.1 (0.2) | 1.0 (0.9) | – (+) | Pale (Atrophy) | Bitemporal (Bitemporal) |
LE | 47 | 48 | 53 | 58 | 30 | 46 | 45 | 50 | 47 | 40 | 0.1 (0.0) | 1.0 (0.9) | – (–) | Pale (Pale) | Bitemporal (Bitemporal) | ||
7 | RE | 64 | 84 | 80 | 42 | 50 | 51 | 51 | 46 | 66 | 39 | CG, HT | 1.1 (1.2) | 0.0 (0.0) | + (+) | Pale (Atrophy) | Temporal (HOMHEM) |
LE | 59 | 83 | 68 | 43 | 44 | 60 | 76 | 70 | 49 | 43 | 0.1 (0.1) | 0.2 (1.0) | – (–) | Pale (Atrophy) | Normal (HOMHEM) | ||
8 | RE | 52 | 48 | 78 | 45 | 37 | 46 | 43 | 67 | 44 | 32 | HT | 0.4 (1.0) | 0.3 (0.0) | – (–) | Atrophy (Atrophy) | Nasal (Nasal) |
LE | 58 | 95 | 60 | 44 | 31 | 47 | 80 | 50 | 32 | 30 | 1.3 (1.4) | 0.0 (0.0) | + (+) | Atrophy (Atrophy) | Nasal (Nasal) | ||
9 | RE | 83 | 73 | 119 | 94 | 47 | 65 | 63 | 92 | 64 | 42 | HT | 0.0 (0.1) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Pale) | Normal (HOMHEM) |
LE | 75 | 68 | 125 | 56 | 52 | 59 | 59 | 80 | 56 | 39 | 0.0 (0.1) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Pale) | Normal (HOMHEM) | ||
10** | RE | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | CG | LP (NLP) | 0.0 (0.0) | + (+) | Atrophy (Atrophy) | None (None) |
LE | 55 | 75 | 56 | 42 | 47 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.1 (0.1) | 0.8 (0.8) | – (–) | Pale (Pale) | Normal (Normal) | ||
11** | RE | 117 | 139 | 144 | 99 | 89 | 101 | 122 | 131 | 88 | 69 | ON | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Normal) |
LE | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | NLP (NLP) | 0.0 (0.0) | + (+) | Pale (Pale) | None (None) | ||
12 | RE | 96 | 103 | 100 | 133 | 48 | 85 | 99 | 72 | 50 | 42 | OT, HT | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Pale (Pale) | HOMHEM (HOMHEM) |
LE | 70 | 93 | 118 | 36 | 36 | 75 | 112 | 102 | 48 | 38 | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | + (+) | Pale (Pale) | HOMHEM (HOMHEM) | ||
13 | RE | 83 | 109 | 112 | 52 | 60 | 67 | 76 | 94 | 48 | 49 | CG, HT | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Pale) | Bitemporal (Temporal) |
LE | 57 | 79 | 60 | 49 | 40 | 50 | 57 | 50 | 47 | 48 | 0.7 (NLP) | 0.5 (0.0) | + (+) | Pale (Atrophy) | Bitemporal (None) |
OCT, optical coherence tomography; Ave, average; SQ, superior quadrant; IQ, inferior quadrant; NQ, nasal quadrant; TQ, temporal quadrant; VA, visual acuity; YO, too young to perform; RAPD, relative afferent pupillary defects; VF, visual fields; HOMHEM, homonymous hemianopia; ON, Optic nerve glioma; OT, Optic tract glioma; CG, Chiasmatic glioma; HT, Hyopthalamic glioma.
Ishihara color plates detected.
In some NLP eyes, OCT scanning was of poor quality and not included.
Table 3.
Pt. no. | RNFL thickness (μm) 1st OCT | RNFL thickness (μm) last OCT | OPG Location | Initial optic nerve function (Last) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ave | SQ | IQ | NQ | TQ | Ave | SQ | IQ | NQ | TQ | VA (LogMar) | Color vision* | RAPD | Disc | VF | |||
1 | RE | 45 | 61 | 56 | 35 | 31 | 41 | 49 | 53 | 34 | 27 | ON, CG | NLP (NLP) | 0.0 (0.0) | + (+) | Atrophy | None |
LE | – | – | – | – | – | 43 | 62 | 49 | 35 | 23 | 0.3 (0.3) | 0.5 (0.3) | – (–) | Atrophy | Temporal (Temporal) | ||
2 | RE | 97 | 107 | 130 | 85 | 68 | 78 | 71 | 119 | 62 | 63 | CG, HT | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.8 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Normal) |
LE | 96 | 104 | 130 | 95 | 53 | 82 | 78 | 123 | 50 | 79 | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Normal) | ||
3 | RE | 110 | 130 | 125 | 96 | 88 | – | – | – | – | – | ON | 0.0 (0.1) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Normal) |
LE | 102 | 122 | 105 | 96 | 84 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.0 (0.1) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Normal) | ||
4 | RE | 86 | 98 | 120 | 67 | 61 | 90 | 113 | 118 | 66 | 63 | ON, CG | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Normal) |
LE | 71 | 81 | 95 | 67 | 41 | 69 | 74 | 99 | 61 | 40 | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Nasal) | ||
5 | RE | 76 | 108 | 91 | 56 | 52 | – | – | – | – | – | ON | 0.0 (0.1) | YO (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Pale) | Normal (Normal) |
LE | 73 | 81 | 104 | 56 | 54 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.0 (0.0) | YO (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Pale) | Normal (Normal) | ||
6 | RE | 60 | 73 | 73 | 52 | 42 | 49 | 51 | 59 | 52 | 34 | ON, OT, CG, HT | 0.2 (0.2) | 1.0 (0.5) | – (–) | Pale (Atrophy) | Bitemporal (Temporal) |
LE | 57 | 70 | 53 | 56 | 49 | 48 | 51 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 1.2 (HM) | 0.3 (0.0) | – (+) | Atrophy (Atrophy) | Bitemporal (None) | ||
7 | RE | 86 | 116 | 100 | 71 | 58 | 78 | 107 | 86 | 48 | 72 | OT | 0.2 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Bitemporal) |
LE | 89 | 111 | 96 | 78 | 72 | 87 | 110 | 97 | 70 | 72 | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Bitemporal) | ||
8 | RE | 101 | 109 | 141 | 85 | 68 | – | – | – | – | – | ON, OT, CG, HT | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Normal) |
LE | 99 | 130 | 132 | 69 | 64 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Normal) | ||
9 | RE | 113 | 173 | 111 | 67 | 102 | – | – | – | – | – | ON, CG | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Normal) |
LE | 47 | 51 | 59 | 42 | 35 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | + (+) | Atrophy (Atrophy) | Nasal (Nasal) | ||
10 | RE | 106 | 110 | 137 | 88 | 64 | – | – | – | – | – | ON, OT, CG, HT | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.8 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Normal) |
LE | 108 | 133 | 137 | 95 | 67 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.8 (1.0) | – (–) | Normal (Normal) | Normal (Normal) |
OCT, optical coherence tomography; Ave, average; SQ, superior quadrant; IQ, inferior quadrant; NQ, nasal quadrant; TQ, temporal quadrant; VA, visual acuity; YO, too young to perform; RAPD, relative afferent pupillary defects; VF, visual fields; HOMHEM, homonymous hemianopia; ON, Optic nerve glioma; OT, Optic tract glioma; CG, Chiasmatic glioma; HT, Hyopthalamic glioma.
Ishihara color plates detected.
Representative Cases
A 6-year-old girl with café au lait lesions was found to have left optic disc pallor on routine screening. She was referred for neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation for suspected NF-1. Visual acuity was 20/32 in the right eye and 20/320 in the left, and Ishihara color vision score was normal on the right and low (3/10 plates) on the left, without RAPD. Lisch nodules were observed on the right iris. Fundus examination revealed right mild optic disc pallor and left optic disc atrophy with advanced cupping (Figures 1A,B). Visual field examination revealed bitemporal hemianopia (Figures 2A,B), and OCT revealed bilateral RNFL thinning (Figure 3A). MRI showed a chiasmatic glioma with bilateral optic nerve involvement (Figures 4A–C). The patient was treated with chemotherapy sessions. On follow-up, both optic discs were further atrophied, and left RAPD developed with a decrease in left visual acuity to HM. Ishihara color vision score decreased, as well as the visual fields (Figure 2C). No progression was noted on MRI (Figures 4D–F) relative to the OCT findings of progression of RNFL thinning (Figure 3B).
A 7-year-old boy was referred for evaluation because of abnormal findings on a school visual acuity screening test. Visual acuity was 20/20 in the right eye and 20/100 in the left. Ishihara color test score was normal on the right and low (5 of 10) on the left, and visual field examination revealed bitemporal hemianopia with a deeper scotoma on the left upper temporal quadrant (Figures 5A,B). Left RAPD and left optic pallor were noted. OCT revealed reduced RNFL thickness on the left compared to the right (Figure 6A). Initial MRI revealed a hypothalamic mass (Figures 7A,B). The diagnosis was non-NF-1 optic glioma. Eight months after treatment was started, there was intra-tumoral bleeding (Figures 7C,D). Emergency surgery was performed, and a shunt was inserted. Vision in the left eye decreased to HM. Follow-up visual field (Figures 5B,C) and OCT (Figure 6B) examinations showed disease progression in the right eye with maintenance of central visual acuity. The patient is currently undergoing rehabilitation after a long hospitalization. He has nasal vision (best corrected visual acuity 20/20) in the right eye and NLP in the left. Tumor regrowth was noted on repeated MRIs since the hemorrhage.
Association of OCT and Visual Function Results
On statistical analysis, thinning of the RNFL on OCT in both the initial and last scan was found to be significantly associated with worse visual acuity (higher logMAR score). This was true both overall (P < 0.001) and by quadrant (P ≤ 0.05) in both groups (Tables 2, 3). A deterioration in OCT findings was also significantly associated with a decrease in color vision (Ishihara test) and worsening visual field findings (P < 0.05 for both). The presence of optic disc atrophy was significantly associated with findings on optic disc measurements by OCT (P < 0.05).
Discussion
OPG compression in the optic nerve, chiasm, or optic tract poses a risk of Wallerian degeneration and subsequent thinning of the RNFL. Owing to the difficulty in assessing visual function in young children, OCT has been suggested as a surrogate tool for optic nerve evaluation (33–35). In the present study, OCT was applied to measure RNFL thickness in children with OPG, with and without NF-1, and the results were compared to visual function tests and neuroimaging. We found that the OCT measurements of the RNFL thickness corresponded with clinical parameters of visual function, especially visual field defects and optic atrophy. The clinical results did not correlate with neuroimaging findings, which showed a mainly stable state of the glioma throughout follow-up. Our neuroimaging findings agree with reports in the literature that OPGs rarely regress regardless of treatment (2, 4, 17).
This study also highlights differences in the course of OPG between children with and without NF-1. Clinical deterioration occurred in some children, mainly in the non-NF-1 group. These findings agree with earlier reports showing that in children with NF-1, OPGs are generally asymptomatic and clinical deterioration is relatively rare (14). The WHO recommends that visual assessment be performed in children with NF-1 every year to age 17 years and MRI in patients presenting with signs of OPG (13). Previous studies have shown monocular nystagmus to be a common presenting sign in infants (36). In our study, the patients without NF-1 were tested for OPG when symptoms or signs started, most commonly visual disturbances. It is generally accepted that after the onset of OPG symptoms, patients without NF-1 need to be reevaluated by MRI every 3 months in the first year and at least once annually thereafter (13, 14). Treatment in this group was often based on tumor-induced symptoms and signs, and findings on follow-up imaging were stable in most cases. Nevertheless, clinical deterioration in the optic nerve function was evident in 10 patients (76.9%), despite 8 patients (61.5%) having stable MRI findings. In 6, there was matching progressive thinning on OCT; in 3 patients, either initial or follow-up OCT data were unavailable for the eye with progression; and in 1 patient, RNFL thinning was already noted on the baseline OCT scan. Follow-up imaging, especially MRI, is important in children with OPG to measure tumor size, but as shown in this study, changes in tumor size (either reduction or enlargement) are not always correlated with the clinical signs. Therefore, clinical examination with OCT measurements can be valuable in determining the treatment strategy.
Because OPGs often affect young patients, clinical follow-up can be complicated by their young age and poor verbal communication. We found stationary OCT to be applicable even in young children, though it was more accessible for children older than 5 years. Hand- held OCT, as described in the literature, if available, might be used even in younger age groups (26, 29). In our cohort, OCT usually demonstrated a normal optic nerve with average RNFL thickness in association with normal visual function. There was also a good association in cases of abnormal RNFL thickness with impaired visual functions, mainly bitemporal or homonymous field defects, reduced visual acuity, or reduced color vision. OCT also made the follow-up evaluation easier and more accurate than computerized analysis of the visual fields which demands good cooperation from the child and is often unfeasible before age 6 years. In an earlier large study of the use of OCT in young children with gliomas, the authors found that measurements of RNFL thickness acquired under sedation could differentiate those with and without vision loss (26). In later studies, the same authors measured RNFL in the macula and found that reduced thickness was significantly associated with lower visual acuity/ higher logMAR scores (P < 0.001) (28, 31, 37). However, we cannot directly compare these findings with our study in which RNFL was measured in optic disc fibers. Furthermore, sedation carries risks and increases the risk to young children who also need sedation for the MRI. Hand-held OCT performed during MRI sedation can resolve this issue.
We found that RNFL thickness was reduced mostly in the temporal quadrant, followed in order by the nasal, superior, and inferior quadrant, as indicative of RNFL loss in pathological nerves. This is in agreement with Chan and Miller (38), who found the temporal sector to be thinnest in severe optic neuropathies. When the glioma was in a more posterior location, such as the optic chiasm, atrophy was greatest in several nerves in the nasal area. This pattern of damage may result from a particular vulnerability of macular axons to compression in this site as a consequence of the location of the fibers within the optic nerve.
There are prior reports on the differences between sporadic (non-NF-1) gliomas and NF-1 associated gliomas, but only a few evaluated the OCT measurements in these two groups. Avery et al. reported longitudinal changes in OCT and correlation to visual loss in children with OPGs, demonstrating a correlation between RNFL thinning and visual loss (30). Similar to our study, they found that sporadic gliomas were more likely to cause vision loss than NF-1 associated gliomas, but they did not directly compare the NF-1 and non-NF-1 patients on OCT.
This study is limited by the retrospective design and the small number of patients for whom OCT measurements were available, specifically on follow-up of the NF-1 group. In addition, the macular ganglion cell layer analysis was not routinely acquired and therefore could not be evaluated.
This study was performed in a tertiary medical center staffed by experienced pediatric neuro-ophthalmologists and equipped with modern devices. OCT may be particularly useful for assessing optic nerve function in more peripheral medical centers that lack these means.
Further studies are still needed to determine the relationship between the OCT results and the anatomic location of OPGs and the influence of glioma involvement on the optic nerve thickness. We believe larger, longitudinal studies with more modern and accurate RNFL and macular ganglion cell layer analysis would be useful to determine the value of OCT as a surrogate marker of the clinical progression of OPG. This could reduce the frequency of MRI studies. Furthermore, OCT studies may overcome the poor relationship between changes in tumor size on MRI and visual outcomes (30).
Ethics Statement
This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Institutional Review Board Ethics Committee at Rabin Medical Center, Israel. Written informed consent was waived by the ethics committee as this is a retrospective study with de-identified patient information. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board Ethics Committee at Rabin Medical Center, Israel.
Author Contributions
NG-C, RC, and JL were responsible for conception and design. AZ, SS, RC, HT, and SM were responsible for acquisition of data. AZ, SS, RC, and HT, SM, and NG-C were responsible for analysis and interpretation of data. AZ, SS, HT, JL, and NG-C drafted the article. RC and SM revised the article for intellectual content. All authors approved the final version.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Funding. This study was partially supported by the Zanvyl and Isabelle Krieger Fund, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. The funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
References
- 1.Takenchi H, Kabuto M, Sato K, Kubota T. Chiasmal gliomas with spontaneous regression: proliferation and apoptosis. Childs Nerv Syst. (1997) 13:229–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Parsa CF, Hoyt CS, Lesser RL, Weinstein JM, Strother CM, Muci-Mendoza R, et al. Spontaneous regression of optic gliomas: thirteen cases documented by serial neuroimaging. Arch. Ophthalmol. (2001) 119:516–29. 10.1001/archopht.119.4.516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu GT, Lessell S. Spontaneous visual improvement in chiasmal gliomas. Am J Ophthalmol. (1992) 114:193–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Traber GL, Pangalu A, Neumann M, Costa J, Weller M, Huna-Baron R, et al. Malignant optic glioma - the spectrum of disease in a case series. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2015) 253:1187–94. 10.1007/s00417-015-3045-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Czyzyk E, Józwiak S, Roszkowski M, Schwartz RA. Optic pathway gliomas in children with and without neurofibromatosis 1. J Child Neurol. (2003) 18:471–8. 10.1177/08830738030180070401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dutton JJ. Gliomas of the anterior visual pathway. Surv Ophthalmol. (1994) 38:427–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dalla Via P, Opocher E, Pinello ML, Calderone M, Viscardi E, Clementi M, et al. Visual outcome of a cohort of children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and optic pathway glioma followed by a pediatric neuro-oncology program. Neuro Oncol. (2007) 9:430–7. 10.1215/15228517-2007-031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Binning MJ, Liu JK, Kestle JRW, Brockmeyer DL, Walker ML. Optic pathway gliomas: a review. Neurosurg Focus (2007) 23:E2. 10.3171/FOC-07/11/E2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gajjar A, Bowers DC, Karajannis MA, Leary S, Witt H, Gottardo NG. Pediatric brain tumors: innovative genomic information is transforming the diagnostic and clinical landscape. J Clin Oncol. (2015) 33:2986–98. 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.9217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Handor H, Laghmari M, Hafidi Z, Daoudi R. [Optic nerve glioma revealed a divergent strabismus]. Pan Afr. Med. J. (2014) 17:256. 10.11604/pamj.2014.17.256.3364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wilhelm H. Primary optic nerve tumours. Curr Opin Neurol. (2009) 22:11–8. 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32831fd9f5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Abdolrahimzadeh B, Piraino DC, Albanese G, Cruciani F, Rahimi S. Neurofibromatosis: an update of ophthalmic characteristics and applications of optical coherence tomography. Clin Ophthalmol. (2016) 10:851–60. 10.2147/OPTH.S102830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Listernick R, Louis DN, Packer RJ, Gutmann DH. Optic pathway gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis 1: consensus statement from the NF1 Optic Pathway Glioma Task Force. Ann Neurol. (1997) 41:143–9. 10.1002/ana.410410204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Listernick R, Ferner RE, Liu GT, Gutmann DH. Optic pathway gliomas in neurofibromatosis-1: controversies and recommendations. Ann Neurol. (2007) 61:189–98. 10.1002/ana.21107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nair AG, Pathak RS, Iyer VR, Gandhi RA. Optic nerve glioma: an update. Int Ophthalmol. (2014) 34:999–1005. 10.1007/s10792-014-9942-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cummings T.J., Provenzale JM, Hunter SB, Friedman AH, Klintworth GK, Bigner SH, et al. Gliomas of the optic nerve: histological, immunohistochemical (MIB-1 and p53), and MRI analysis. Acta Neuropathol. (2000) 99:563–70. 10.1007/s004010051161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gottschalk S, Tavakolian R, Buske A, Tinschert S, Lehmann R. Spontaneous remission of chiasmatic/hypothalamic masses in neurofibromatosis type 1: report of two cases. Neuroradiology (1999) 41:199–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Avery RA, Ferner RE, Listernick R, Fisher MJ, Gutmann DH, Liu GT. Visual acuity in children with low grade gliomas of the visual pathway: implications for patient care and clinical research. J Neurooncol. (2012) 110:1–7. 10.1007/s11060-012-0944-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kelly JP, Leary S, Khanna P, Weiss AH. Longitudinal measures of visual function, tumor volume, and prediction of visual outcomes after treatment of optic pathway gliomas. Ophthalmology (2012) 119:1231–7. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nicolin G, Parkin P, Mabbott D, Hargrave D, Bartels U, Tabori U, et al. Natural history and outcome of optic pathway gliomas in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer (2009) 53:1231–7. 10.1002/pbc.22198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dodgshun AJ, Elder JE, Hansford JR, Sullivan MJ. Long-term visual outcome after chemotherapy for optic pathway glioma in children: site and age are strongly predictive. Cancer (2015) 121:4190–6. 10.1002/cncr.29649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fujimoto JG. Optical coherence tomography for ultrahigh resolution in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol. (2003) 21:1361–7. 10.1038/nbt892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Topcu-Yilmaz P, Kasim B, Kiratli H. Investigation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in patients with neurofibromatosis-1. Jpn J Ophthalmol. (2014) 58:172–6. 10.1007/s10384-014-0308-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hepokur M, Sarici AM. Investigation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer thickness in patients with optic pathway gliomas. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2018) 10.1007/s00417-018-4007-8. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fard MA, Fakhree S, Eshraghi B. Correlation of optical coherence tomography parameters with clinical and radiological progression in patients with symptomatic optic pathway gliomas. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. (2013) 251:2429–36. 10.1007/s00417-013-2394-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Avery RA, Hwang EI, Ishikawa H, Acosta MT, Hutcheson KA, Santos D, et al. Handheld optical coherence tomography during sedation in young children with optic pathway gliomas. JAMA Ophthalmol. (2014) 132:265. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.7649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chang L, El-Dairi MA, Frempong TA, Burner EL, Bhatti MT, Young TL, et al. Optical coherence tomography in the evaluation of neurofibromatosis type-1 subjects with optic pathway gliomas. J AAPOS (2010) 14:511–7. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gu S, Glaug N, Cnaan A, Packer RJ, Avery RA. Ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer thickness and vision loss in young children with optic pathway gliomas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. (2014) 55:1402–8. 10.1167/iovs.13-13119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Avery RA, Cnaan A, Schuman JS, Chen CL, Glaug NC, Packer RJ, et al. Intra- and inter-visit reproducibility of ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer measurements using handheld optical coherence tomography in children with optic pathway gliomas. Am J Ophthalmol. (2014) 158:916–23.e1. 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.07.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Avery RA, Cnaan A, Schuman JS, Trimboli-Heidler C, Chen CL, Packer RJ, et al. Longitudinal change of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children with optic pathway gliomas. Am J Ophthalmol. (2015) 160:944–52.e1. 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Avery RA, Liu GT, Fisher MJ, Quinn GE, Belasco JB, Phillips PC, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children with optic pathway gliomas. Am J Ophthalmol. (2011) 151:542–9.e2. 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.08.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Avery RA, Mansoor A, Idrees R, Trimboli-Heidler C, Ishikawa H, Packer RJ, et al. Optic pathway glioma volume predicts retinal axon degeneration in neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurology (2016) 87:2403–7. 10.1212/wnl.0000000000003402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee H, Proudlock FA, Gottlob I. Pediatric optical coherence tomography in clinical practice—recent progress. Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci. (2016) 57:69–79. 10.1167/iovs.15-18825 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Parrozzani R, Clementi M, Kotsafti O, Miglionico G, Trevisson E, Orlando G, et al. Optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of optic pathway gliomas. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. (2013) 54:8112–8. 10.1167/iovs.13-13093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Banc A, Stan C, Florian IS. Optical coherence tomography as a marker of vision in children with optic pathway gliomas. Child's Nerv. Syst. (2018) 34:51–60. 10.1007/s00381-017-3578-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Toledano H, Muhsinoglu O, Luckman J, Goldenberg-Cohen N, Michowiz S. Acquired nystagmus as the initial presenting sign of chiasmal glioma in young children. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. (2015) 19:694–700. 10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fisher MJ, Loguidice M, Gutmann DH, Listernick R, Ferner RE, Ullrich NJ, et al. Visual outcomes in children with neurofibromatosis type 1-associated optic pathway glioma following chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Neuro Oncol. (2012) 14:790–7. 10.1093/neuonc/nos076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chan CK, Miller NR. Peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in patients with no light perception from long-standing nonglaucomatous optic neuropathies. J Neuroophthalmol. (2007) 27:176–9. 10.1097/WNO.0b013e31814b1ac4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]