ABSTRACT
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator 2 (ARNT2) is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix/PER-ARNT-SIM (bHLH/PAS) transcription factor family. ARNT2 heterodimerizes with several members of the family, including single-minded homolog-1 (SIM1) and neuronal PAS domain protein 4 (NPAS4), primarily in neurons of the central nervous system. We screened 64,424 third-generation germline mutant mice derived from N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-mutagenized great-grandsires for weight abnormalities. Among 17 elevated body weight phenotypes identified and mapped, one strongly correlated with an induced missense mutation in Arnt2 using a semidominant model of inheritance. Causation was confirmed by CRISPR/Cas9 gene targeting to recapitulate the original ENU allele, specifying Arg74Cys (R74C). The CRISPR/Cas9-targeted (Arnt2R74C/R74C) mice demonstrated hyperphagia and increased adiposity as well as hepatic steatosis and abnormalities in glucose homeostasis. The mutant ARNT2 protein showed decreased transcriptional activity when coexpressed with SIM1. These findings establish a requirement for ARNT2-dependent genes in the maintenance of the homeostatic feeding response, necessary for prevention of obesity and obesity-related diseases.
KEY WORDS: N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea, ENU, Obesity, Hyperphagia
Summary: A forward genetic approach identified genes involved in maintaining normal body weight. A mutation in Arnt2 caused obesity by regulating food intake.
INTRODUCTION
Obesity is growing in prevalence, with more than a third of the world population currently overweight or obese. Comorbid conditions, such as type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, stroke and liver disease, cause a large economic health burden in the United States. Human genetic studies have largely demonstrated a polygenic etiology for these diseases with little insight into individual gene function. Rare familial monogenic obesity syndromes have been informative in elucidating underpinnings of obesity, demonstrating roles for genes such as SIM1 and TUB in obesity (Barsh et al., 2000; van der Klaauw and Farooqi, 2015). These monogenic disorders account for a minute fraction of human obesity, which emphasizes the importance of finding new contributory loci (Hendricks et al., 2017; Kleinert et al., 2018).
The essential molecular components required for maintenance of body weight can be revealed by random germline mutagenesis, particularly when combined with automated mapping (Wang et al., 2015). Accordingly, we carried out a forward genetic screen of mice with N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-induced mutations, assessing for deviation from normal body weight. Here, we describe mice bearing a mutation in Arnt2 (R74C), which developed hyperphagic obesity as well as fatty liver and glucose intolerance. A member of the basic helix-loop-helix/PER-ARNT-SIM (bHLH/PAS) transcription factor family, Arnt2 encodes the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator 2 (ARNT2), which is expressed in the CNS and is necessary for production of secretory hormones in the hypothalamus (Hankinson, 2008; Hosoya et al., 2001; Keith et al., 2001). In marked contrast to mice with null mutations of Arnt2, homozygous Arnt2R74C mice are born at expected Mendelian frequencies and survive to adulthood. Our findings reveal an important role for ARNT2 and ARNT2-dependent genes in regulating feeding behavior and body fat mass, advancing our understanding of the mechanisms controlling these traits.
RESULTS
Weight-based screening of ENU-induced mutant mice
To identify genes required for the maintenance of normal body weight, we screened C57BL/6J third-generation (G3) mice bred to carry homozygous and heterozygous mutations induced by ENU in their great-grandsires (G0 mice). G3 mice were genotyped (prior to phenotypic screening) for all mutations present in their pedigree, passed down from a single G1 grandsire that was subjected to exome sequencing. G3 mice were individually weighed after weaning, and their ages noted (Fig. S1). Because G3 mice from a given pedigree are born over a period of 2-3 months and phenotypically screened as a group, raw body weight data could not be used directly for linkage analysis. Instead, we determined the body weight change of an individual mouse relative to the average body weight of age- and sex-matched mice among a group of 10,807 C57BL/6J G3 mice; these mice were housed under the same conditions and carried ENU-induced mutations. Body weight change was used as a continuous variable for linkage analysis. A total of 64,424 G3 mice from 2356 pedigrees were screened for phenovariance in the body weight screen (Fig. 1A,B). These pedigrees were a repository of 98,684 mutations in 17,702 genes that were transmitted to homozygosity three or more times and examined for phenotypic effects. Among the 98,684 mutations, 5906 mutations in 3856 genes were putative null alleles (premature stop codons or critical splice junction errors), while 29,693 mutations in 7789 genes were predicted to be ‘probably damaging’ by PolyPhen-2 (Polymorphism Phenotyping v2) with a score of 0.95 or greater (Adzhubei et al., 2010) (Table 1). In the body weight screen to date, we estimate that 26.5% of the genome has been modified with truly damaging mutations that have been tested in the homozygous state at least three times (Wang et al., 2018).
Table 1.
During the course of the body weight screen, linkage mapping identified putative causative mutations in 17 pedigrees (Table 2). For each mutation, there were at least two homozygous variant mice and their average weight was at least 3 g more than that of wild-type or heterozygous controls, resulting in P-values for linkage of less than 5×10−4 with Bonferroni correction. Several mutations in genes known to cause increased body weight in mice were identified, including mutations in Alms1, Clock, Ksr2, Socs2, Tub, Lep, Lepr and Mc4r, validating the utility of the screen. Mutations in human KSR2, MC4R, LEP and LEPR have been described as monogenic causes of obesity (Barsh et al., 2000; Turcot et al., 2018), confirming that this screen has relevance to human monogenic obesity disorders.
Table 2.
A semidominant mutation in Arnt2 is associated with increased body weight
One Arnt2 missense allele was detected in five pedigrees sharing a common G0 ancestor and was found in homozygous state in three of these pedigrees. The data from all five pedigrees were pooled into a position-specific superpedigree (Wang et al., 2015) (Fig. 1C), revealing a highly significant semidominant effect on body weight (P=1.828×10−11). Homozygosity for the allele, named Arnold2, was associated with an average increase of 7.9 g in age-/sex-adjusted body weight over wild-type littermates across the five pedigrees (Fig. 1D). The Arnold2 mutation results in an arginine to cysteine substitution at amino acid 74 (R74C) in the ARNT2 protein; this change was predicted ‘probably damaging’ by PolyPhen-2 (score 1.0). Arg74 is located in the basic helix-loop-helix domain of ARNT2 (Fig. 1E). These data implicate the R74C mutation in Arnt2 as causative for the obesity phenotype in the Arnold2 mice.
In order to verify causation, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting was used to generate a single-nucleotide replacement allele (C→T at chr7_84,347,530), causing the same amino acid change as that caused by the ENU-induced mutation (R74C) (Fig. S2). Like homozygous Arnold2 mice, Arnt2R74C/R74C mice were born at normal Mendelian frequencies and survived to adulthood (99 Arnt2R74C/R74C of 399 total offspring from heterozygous parents; 24.8%). The Arnt2R74C/R74C mice showed increased body weights compared to wild-type controls (Fig. 2A). Growth curves of Arnt2R74C/R74C male and female mice showed increased body weights for all time points examined from 6 weeks to 16 weeks of age as compared to Arnt2R74C/+ and Arnt2+/+ mice (Fig. 2B). By 4 months of age, Arnt2R74C/R74C male and female mice weighed on average 14.1 and 13.1 g, respectively, more than age-/sex-matched Arnt2+/+ littermates (Fig. 2B). The average linear growth of male and female animals was increased 8.1 mm and 6.8 mm over control littermates, respectively (Fig. 2C).
In order to examine the overall body composition of the Arnt2R74C/R74C mice, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was employed. At 4 months of age, the Arnt2R74C/R74C mice showed increased absolute adiposity amounts compared to wild-type and heterozygous littermates; the phenotype was especially prominent in female mice (Fig. 2D). Taken together, the findings from the Arnt2R74C/R74C mice confirmed that the Arnold2 mutation caused increased body weight, and is a monogenic cause of obesity in mice.
Diabetes and hepatic steatosis in Arnt2R74C/R74C mice
The major health consequences of obesity include the development of diabetes and a predisposition towards non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. In order to examine glucose homeostasis in Arnt2 mutant mice, we measured fasting blood glucose and fasting insulin, and assessed glucose tolerance. Fasted male Arnt2R74C/R74C mice displayed elevated circulating insulin and glucose levels compared to fasted wild-type littermate mice (Fig. 3A,C). Thirty minutes after intraperitoneal injection of glucose, male Arnt2R74C/R74C mice displayed elevated blood glucose levels, indicating aberrant glucose tolerance (Fig. 3B); a modest heterozygote effect was observed as well. These metabolic effects were also seen in female mice (Fig. S3A-C). These data demonstrate that the Arnt2R74C mutation leads to aberrant glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance.
Necropsied Arnt2R74C/R74C mice had hepatomegaly (Fig. 3D). Histologically, the Arnt2R74C/R74C liver showed evidence of steatosis without obvious inflammation (Fig. 3E). These data demonstrate that the Arnt2R74C/R74C mice develop hepatomegaly and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, presumably as a consequence of obesity and insulin resistance.
Arnt2 mutant mice display hyperphagia
To better understand the physiological consequences of the Arnt2 mutation, we examined the metabolic phenotype of the Arnt2R74C/R74C mice. After metabolic cage housing for 10 days, male Arnt2R74C/R74C mice had energy expenditure and respiratory efficiencies equivalent to those of wild-type mice (Fig. 4A,B). This indicates that Arnt2R74C/R74C mice have normal energy expenditures. The Arnt2R74C/R74C mice were noted to have a mild decrease in peripheral cage activity, but normal amounts of central cage activity (Fig. 4C). Additionally, the Arnt2R74C/R74C mice consumed about 10% more food and 35% more water than wild-type mice (Fig. 4D,E). Taken together, this suggests that the Arnt2R74C/R74C obesity phenotype is due to excess caloric intake rather than an overall defect in metabolism.
Arnt2 mutant mice display normal hypothalamic cellularity
Compared to wild-type mice, Arnt2−/− mice suffer from perinatal lethality and developmental defects of secretory neurons of the hypothalamus (Hosoya et al., 2001). ARNT2 is most highly expressed in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) as well as the supraoptic nucleus (SON) of the hypothalamus. This expression pattern appears specific and regulated, as no expression is seen in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) (Michaud et al., 2000). Brains from Arnt2 mutant mice were grossly identical to those of wild-type mice and histologic analysis did not show any absolute difference in the size of the hypothalamic nuclei nor total neuron density of the PVN, SON and SCN of Arnt2R74C/R74C compared to wild-type mice (Fig. S4A,B). These data indicate that hypothalamic development is grossly intact in Arnt2R74C/R74C mice and suggest that the defects observed in Arnt2 mutants likely result from a functional defect in transcription factor activity.
The Arnt2R74C mutation decreases the transcriptional activity of the ARNT2-SIM1 complex
bHLH-PAS proteins function as heterodimers, and ARNT2 has been shown to heterodimerize with several members of the family, including NPAS4, SIM1 and SIM2, to form active transcription factors (Bersten et al., 2014, 2013; Jain et al., 1998). SIM1 regulates feeding behavior in both humans and mice (Holder et al., 2000; McMinn et al., 2000; Tolson et al., 2014), and was reported to be the in vivo dimerization partner of ARNT2 necessary for development of the hypothalamus (Michaud et al., 2000). The hyperphagic obesity phenotype of Arnt2R74C/R74C mice is similar to that observed in SIM1-deficient (Sim1+/−) mice (Kublaoui et al., 2008). Therefore, we sought to assess the transcriptional consequence of the Arnt2R74C mutation in the context of the ARNT2-SIM1 complex. The ability of the complex to activate transcription was assessed using a luciferase reporter gene under the control of six repeats of a bHLH-PAS core binding element [6×CME (CNS midline elements)]. Co-transfection of wild-type ARNT2 with SIM1 in HEK293T cells led to induction of the CME reporter as compared to cells without ARNT2-SIM1 or those with a mutated reporter (Fig. 5A). Cells expressing SIM1 and ARNT2R74C showed a 50% reduction in luciferase activity compared to those expressing SIM1 and wild-type ARNT2 (Fig. 5A). This reduction was not due to protein stability of the mutant since similar levels of protein expression were found upon transfection of FLAG-tagged wild-type ARNT2 and ARNT2R74C in HEK293T cells (Fig. 5B). ARNT2 and ARNT2R74C displayed equivalent heterodimerization to SIM1 in coimmunoprecipitation assays in the cytosol (Fig. 5C). Upon assessing the nuclear fraction of transfected cells, ARNT2R74C itself as well as the ARNT2R74C-SIM1 co-precipitating complex were found to be decreased compared to those detected in cells expressing the wild-type ARNT2 protein. This reduced nuclear localization is consistent with another N-terminal mutant of ARNT2, similarly displaying decreased nuclear localization and decreased transcriptional activity (Bersten et al., 2014). These data suggest that Arnt2R74C encodes a stable, but hypofunctional, protein due to a failure to translocate to the nucleus.
DISCUSSION
In the present study, we established a weight-based screen using ENU-mutagenized mice to identify monogenic causes of obesity. Using an isogenic C57BL6/J background, we were able to eliminate variability due to genetic background. Using this unbiased approach, we found a previously undescribed role for the transcription factor ARNT2 in limiting body weight. Our findings indicate that ARNT2 functions to restrict feeding behavior, but has little effect on energy metabolism as measured by respiratory exchange ratio (RER), energy expenditure (EE) and cage activity. As a consequence of hyperphagic obesity, Arnt2 mutant mice develop diabetes, insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis.
Arnt2R74C homozygous mice show similarly increased food consumption to Sim1+/− mice (10% and 15%, respectively) (Tolson et al., 2010, 2014), which display deficits in neuroendocrine hormones that regulate feeding, such as oxytocin (Kublaoui et al., 2008). Together with evidence that the ARNT2-SIM1 heterodimer is critical for embryonic development of the hypothalamic paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei (Michaud et al., 2000), which control feeding behavior, our findings suggest that ARNT2 cooperates with SIM1 to regulate the function of hypothalamic circuits regulating feeding in adult animals. RNAseq analysis of SIM1-expressing neurons from ARNT2 mutant mice may be informative in identifying ARNT2-SIM1-dependent hormones that regulate feeding. ARNT2 has additional binding partners within the nervous system, including NPAS4 (Bersten et al., 2014); therefore, Arnt2R74C/R74C mice may also show CNS transcriptional perturbations distinct from those of SIM1-deficient mice.
Whereas Arnt2-knockout homozygotes die perinatally (Hosoya et al., 2001), Arnt2R74C/R74C mice are fully viable, suggesting a hypomorphic effect of this missense mutation. Based on a reporter assay for ARNT2-SIM1-dependent transcription in vitro, we speculate that ARNT2R74C supports approximately 50% of wild-type levels of transcription, notwithstanding any additional target-specific regulation. This hypomorphic effect appears to probably be due to decreased nuclear translocation, resulting in decreased ARNT2-SIM1 heterodimers in the nucleus. Whatever the level, it is apparently sufficient during embryonic development to permit survival past the perinatal stage, but insufficient in controlling feeding behavior in adults. We note that differences in strain background between the null allele (Hosoya et al., 2001) and the missense allele described here may also contribute to differences in viability of the respective homozygotes.
Forward genetic analysis of ENU-mutagenized mice can, in principle, reveal all non-redundant genes necessary for maintenance of normal body weight. Based on the identification of putatively causative obesity mutations in 15 distinct genes from a survey of 26.5% of mouse genes damaged and tested in the homozygous state three times or more, we estimate that weight-promoting mutations in approximately 56 genes will be identified once 100% saturation is achieved. To date, only Mc4r corresponds to a locus found in body mass index genome-wide association studies, a fact which may reflect the relative rarity of viable damaging mutations of the mapped loci in the human population (Locke et al., 2015). Notably, hyperphagia leading to excess caloric intake is a major mechanism of the mapped mutations in this study, such as mutations in Lep, Lepr, Alms1, Mc4r, Ksr2 and Arnt2. This is compared to relatively few genes (e.g. Tub) with known metabolic or activity phenotypes (Coyle et al., 2008; Stubdal et al., 2000). In the future, applying diet-based interventions such as high-fat or high-carbohydrate diets in forward genetic screening may expose additional obesity genes, and change the underlying etiology of the observed obesity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice
All experiments used mice (Mus musculus) of the C57BL/6J strain. Eight- to 10-week-old C57BL/6J mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratories. ENU mutagenesis of C57BL/6J mice was performed as previously described (Georgel et al., 2008). Mutagenized G0 males were bred to C57BL/6J females, and the resulting G1 males were crossed to C57BL/6J females to produce G2 mice. G2 females were backcrossed to their G1 sires to yield G3 mice, which were screened for phenotypes (Fig. S1). All mice were housed in the University of Texas Southwestern vivarium at an ambient temperature of 21.1-23.1°C. Mice received a standard chow diet containing 16.4% protein and 5% fat (Envigo Teklad 2016). All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and were performed in accordance with institutionally approved protocols.
Generation of the Arnt2R74C/R74C mouse strain using the CRISPR/Cas9 system
To generate the Arnt2R74C/R74C mouse strain, female C57BL/6J mice were superovulated by injection of 6.5 U pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG; Millipore), followed by injection of 6.5 U human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; Sigma-Aldrich) 48 h later. The superovulated mice were subsequently mated overnight with C57BL/6J male mice. The following day, fertilized eggs were collected from the oviducts and in vitro-transcribed Cas9 mRNA (50 ng/μl) and Arnt2 small base-pairing guide RNA (50 ng/μl; 5′-ACAGTGAGATTGAGCGGCGC-3′) and single-stranded DNA template (5′-tccttctctttttccctccccctgacctcttgctttctgggaagagagaaccacagtgagattgagcggTGCaggcggaacaagatgactcaatatattacggaactctccgacatggttcccacctgcagtgcactggctag-3′; the mutation site within the template DNA is indicated in upper-case letters) were injected into the cytoplasm or pronucleus of the embryos. The injected embryos were cultured in M16 medium (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C in 5% CO2. For the production of mutant mice, two-cell-stage embryos were transferred into the ampulla of the oviduct (10-20 embryos per oviduct) of pseudo-pregnant Hsd:ICR (CD-1) female mice (Harlan Laboratories).
Phenotypic screening, sequencing and determination of candidate genes
Whole-exome sequencing and mapping were performed as described (Wang et al., 2015). Briefly, exome-enriched DNA from all G1 mice was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform; the G1 mouse of a pedigree carries all possible mutations passed down to its G3 descendants. Prior to phenotypic screening, all G3 mice were genotyped across coding mutations according to their pedigree using Ion Torrent AmpliSeq custom primer panels. Phenotypic screening was performed with the experimenter blinded to genotype and involved weighing individual G3 mice post-weaning; each mouse was weighed one time. To permit comparisons between mice of different ages and genders, body weight change was used instead of raw body weight data. Body weight change was calculated for each mouse relative to the average body weight for a given age and gender, determined from measurements of 10,807 G3 mice on a C57BL/6J background, carrying ENU-induced mutations, and housed under the same conditions (same vivarium, light cycle, feed and water). Body weight change was used as a continuous variable for linkage analysis. Briefly, automated computation of single locus linkage was performed for every mutation in the pedigree using recessive, semi-dominant (additive) and dominant models of transmission using the program Linkage Analyzer (Wang et al., 2015). The magnitude of the quantitative phenotype (here body weight change) was correlated with genotype (REF, homozygous for C57BL/6J reference allele; HET, heterozygous for reference allele and variant allele; or VAR, homozygous for variant allele) at each mutation site in all mice in the pedigree. Continuous variables were analyzed using a linear regression model to assess linkage between specific mutations and quantitative traits. The output of automated mapping was a Manhattan plot of the P-value of genotype-phenotype association using recessive, semi-dominant and dominant models of transmission for every mutation in the pedigree.
Glucose homeostasis testing
Glucose tolerance tests were initiated by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of glucose at a dose of 1.5 g/kg body weight after a 16-h fast. Blood was collected from the tail vein for measurement of glucose with the AlphaTRAK glucometer and test strips.
Histology and microscopy
Freshly isolated livers and brains were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was conducted using a standard protocol by the University of Texas Southwestern Histology core. Nissl stain of brains was conducted using a standard protocol by the University of Texas Southwestern Neurohistology core. All brain sections were examined and neuron counting was performed by a neuropathologist, who was blinded to genotypes.
Metabolic profiling and body composition
Food intake, meal patterns, energy expenditure and locomotor activity were monitored using a combined indirect calorimetry system (Labmaster, TSE Systems GmbH, Germany). Experimental animals were individually housed in a light (12 h on/12 h off, 07:00-19:00)- and temperature (22.5-23.5°C)-controlled environment, and acclimated in the home cage for 5 days before data collection. Mice were then analyzed in the metabolic chambers for 4 days and were provided with food and water ad libitum. O2 consumption and CO2 production were measured by indirect calorimetry to determine energy expenditure. Locomotor activity was measured using a multidimensional infrared light-beam detection system. Continuous food and water intake was recorded using lid-mounted sensors. The diet used in the metabolic cages was 2016 Teklad global 16% protein rodent diets (Envigo, cat. number 2016S). Body composition was assessed by Bruker Minispec mq10.
Cells and transfection
HEK293T cells (ATCC) were cultured in high-glucose DMEM (Gibco Life Technologies) containing 10% (vol/vol) FBS (HyClone), 10,000 units/ml penicillin and 10,000 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C. Cells were tested periodically for mycoplasma contamination by Cell Culture Contamination Detection Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Murine Arnt2 (mArnt2) cDNA, HA-Sim1 cDNA, and 6×CME and mutant 6×CME luciferase were a kind gift from J. Pelletier (Moffett and Pelletier, 2000). mArnt2 was cloned into a FLAG-tagged expression vector (Clontech). FLAG was immunoprecipitated using magnetic anti-FLAG M2 beads (Sigma). Nuclear and cytosolic lysates were generated using a Cell Fractionation kit (Cell Signaling Technology) as per the manufacturer’s guidelines. The Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System was performed per assay instructions (Promega). Antibodies for western blot were commercially obtained: anti-FLAG M2 (Sigma, F1804; 1:2000); anti-ARNT2 (Abcam, ab70122; 1:1000); anti-GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology, 5174S; 1:1000) and anti-histone H3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9715S; 1:1000).
Statistical analysis
Age- and sex-matched mice were randomly allocated to experimental groups based on their genotypes. No pre-specified effect size was assumed, and 3-12 mice per genotype were used in experiments; this sample size was sufficient to demonstrate statistically significant differences in comparisons between two or more unpaired experimental groups by unpaired t-test or ANOVA, respectively. All mice were included during data analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism. Data represent mean±s.d. in all graphs depicting error bars. The statistical significance of differences between experimental groups was determined by Student's t-test for comparisons of a single parameter between two groups, or one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's test for comparison of one parameter between multiple groups. All differences with P<0.05 were considered significant. P-values are denoted by *P≤0.05; **P≤0.005; ***P≤0.0005; ns, not significant with P>0.05. Because mice utilized in this study were inbred and age- and sex-matched, variance was assumed to be similar between treatment groups. Phenotypic data were assumed to follow a normal distribution, as has been observed in large datasets from numerous phenotypic screens conducted by our group.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Anne Murray and Eva M. Y. Moresco for reading the manuscript and for helpful comments.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing or financial interests.
Author contributions
Conceptualization: E.E.T., B.B.; Methodology: E.E.T., B.B.; Validation: E.E.T.; Formal analysis: E.E.T.; Investigation: E.E.T., M.S.M., K.W., W.M., F.O., X.L., M.T., Z.Z., J.W., B.H., B.E., X.Z., J.R.; Resources: J.R., B.B.; Data curation: E.E.T.; Writing - original draft: E.E.T.; Writing - review & editing: E.E.T., B.B.; Supervision: B.B.; Project administration: B.B.; Funding acquisition: B.B.
Funding
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) K08 grant DK107886 (E.E.T.), Immunology T32 training grant AI005184 (W.M.) and NIH grant R37 GM066759 (B.B.).
Supplementary information
Supplementary information available online at http://dmm.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dmm.035451.supplemental
References
- Adzhubei I. A., Schmidt S., Peshkin L., Ramensky V. E., Gerasimova A., Bork P., Kondrashov A. S. and Sunyaev S. R. (2010). A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 7, 248-249. 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barsh G. S., Farooqi I. S. and O'Rahilly S. (2000). Genetics of body-weight regulation. Nature 404, 644-651. 10.1038/35007519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bersten D. C., Sullivan A. E., Peet D. J. and Whitelaw M. L. (2013). bHLH-PAS proteins in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 827-841. 10.1038/nrc3621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bersten D. C., Bruning J. B., Peet D. J. and Whitelaw M. L. (2014). Human variants in the neuronal basic helix-loop-helix/Per-Arnt-Sim (bHLH/PAS) transcription factor complex NPAS4/ARNT2 disrupt function. PLoS ONE 9, e85768 10.1371/journal.pone.0085768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coyle C. A., Strand S. C. and Good D. J. (2008). Reduced activity without hyperphagia contributes to obesity in Tubby mutant mice. Physiol. Behav. 95, 168-175. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.05.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Georgel P., Du X., Hoebe K. and Beutler B. (2008). ENU mutagenesis in mice. Methods Mol. Biol. 415, 1-16. 10.1007/978-1-59745-570-1_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hankinson O. (2008). Why does ARNT2 behave differently from ARNT? Toxicol. Sci. 103, 1-3. 10.1093/toxsci/kfn032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hendricks A. E., Bochukova E. G., Marenne G., Keogh J. M., Atanassova N., Bounds R., Wheeler E., Mistry V., Henning E., Korner A. et al. (2017). Rare variant analysis of human and rodent obesity genes in individuals with severe childhood obesity. Sci. Rep. 7, 4394 10.1038/s41598-017-03054-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holder J. L. Jr, Butte N. F. and Zinn A. R. (2000). Profound obesity associated with a balanced translocation that disrupts the SIM1 gene. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 101-108. 10.1093/hmg/9.1.101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hosoya T., Oda Y., Takahashi S., Morita M., Kawauchi S., Ema M., Yamamoto M. and Fujii-Kuriyama Y. (2001). Defective development of secretory neurones in the hypothalamus of Arnt2-knockout mice. Genes Cells 6, 361-374. 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2001.00421.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jain S., Maltepe E., Lu M. M., Simon C. and Bradfield C. A. (1998). Expression of ARNT, ARNT2, HIF1 alpha, HIF2 alpha and Ah receptor mRNAs in the developing mouse. Mech. Dev. 73, 117-123. 10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00038-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keith B., Adelman D. M. and Simon M. C. (2001). Targeted mutation of the murine arylhydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator 2 (Arnt2) gene reveals partial redundancy with Arnt. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6692-6697. 10.1073/pnas.121494298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleinert M., Clemmensen C., Hofmann S. M., Moore M. C., Renner S., Woods S. C., Huypens P., Beckers J., de Angelis M. H., Schurmann A. et al. (2018). Animal models of obesity and diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14, 140-162. 10.1038/nrendo.2017.161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kublaoui B. M., Gemelli T., Tolson K. P., Wang Y. and Zinn A. R. (2008). Oxytocin deficiency mediates hyperphagic obesity of Sim1 haploinsufficient mice. Mol. Endocrinol. 22, 1723-1734. 10.1210/me.2008-0067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Locke A. E., Kahali B., Berndt S. I., Justice A. E., Pers T. H., Day F. R., Powell C., Vedantam S., Buchkovich M. L., Yang J. et al. (2015). Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature 518, 197-206. 10.1038/nature14177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMinn J. E., Baskin D. G. and Schwartz M. W. (2000). Neuroendocrine mechanisms regulating food intake and body weight. Obes. Rev. 1, 37-46. 10.1046/j.1467-789x.2000.00007.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michaud J. L., DeRossi C., May N. R., Holdener B. C. and Fan C.-M. (2000). ARNT2 acts as the dimerization partner of SIM1 for the development of the hypothalamus. Mech. Dev. 90, 253-261. 10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00328-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moffett P. and Pelletier J. (2000). Different transcriptional properties of mSim-1 and mSim-2. FEBS Lett. 466, 80-86. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01750-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stubdal H., Lynch C. A., Moriarty A., Fang Q., Chickering T., Deeds J. D., Fairchild-Huntress V., Charlat O., Dunmore J. H., Kleyn P. et al. (2000). Targeted deletion of the tub mouse obesity gene reveals that tubby is a loss-of-function mutation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 878-882. 10.1128/MCB.20.3.878-882.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tolson K. P., Gemelli T., Gautron L., Elmquist J. K., Zinn A. R. and Kublaoui B. M. (2010). Postnatal Sim1 deficiency causes hyperphagic obesity and reduced Mc4r and oxytocin expression. J. Neurosci. 30, 3803-3812. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5444-09.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tolson K. P., Gemelli T., Meyer D., Yazdani U., Kozlitina J. and Zinn A. R. (2014). Inducible neuronal inactivation of Sim1 in adult mice causes hyperphagic obesity. Endocrinology 155, 2436-2444. 10.1210/en.2013-2125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turcot V., Lu Y., Highland H. M., Schurmann C., Justice A. E., Fine R. S., Bradfield J. P., Esko T., Giri A., Graff M. et al. (2018). Protein-altering variants associated with body mass index implicate pathways that control energy intake and expenditure in obesity. Nat. Genet. 50, 26-41. 10.1038/s41588-017-0011-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Klaauw A. A. and Farooqi I. S. (2015). The hunger genes: pathways to obesity. Cell 161, 119-132. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang T., Zhan X., Bu C.-H., Lyon S., Pratt D., Hildebrand S., Choi J. H., Zhang Z., Zeng M., Wang K.-W. et al. (2015). Real-time resolution of point mutations that cause phenovariance in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E440-E449. 10.1073/pnas.1423216112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang T., Bu C. H., Hildebrand S., Jia G., Siggs O. M., Lyon S., Pratt D., Scott L., Russell J., Ludwig S. et al. (2018). Probability of phenotypically detectable protein damage by ENU-induced mutations in the Mutagenetix database. Nat. Commun. 9, 441 10.1038/s41467-017-02806-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.