Strehlow et al. describe the largest cohort to date of individuals with GRIN2A-related disorders. The results reveal two phenotypic subgroups associated with different classes of variants affecting distinct domains of the GluN2A protein with different functional consequences. The findings will help predict outcomes in newly diagnosed individuals.
Keywords: channelopathy, molecular genetics, learning disability, childhood epilepsy, spike-wave EEG
Abstract
Alterations of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) subunit GluN2A, encoded by GRIN2A, have been associated with a spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders with prominent speech-related features, and epilepsy. We performed a comprehensive assessment of phenotypes with a standardized questionnaire in 92 previously unreported individuals with GRIN2A-related disorders. Applying the criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics to all published variants yielded 156 additional cases with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in GRIN2A, resulting in a total of 248 individuals. The phenotypic spectrum ranged from normal or near-normal development with mild epilepsy and speech delay/apraxia to severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, often within the epilepsy-aphasia spectrum. We found that pathogenic missense variants in transmembrane and linker domains (misTMD+Linker) were associated with severe developmental phenotypes, whereas missense variants within amino terminal or ligand-binding domains (misATD+LBD) and null variants led to less severe developmental phenotypes, which we confirmed in a discovery (P = 10−6) as well as validation cohort (P = 0.0003). Other phenotypes such as MRI abnormalities and epilepsy types were also significantly different between the two groups. Notably, this was paralleled by electrophysiology data, where misTMD+Linker predominantly led to NMDAR gain-of-function, while misATD+LBD exclusively caused NMDAR loss-of-function. With respect to null variants, we show that Grin2a+/− cortical rat neurons also had reduced NMDAR function and there was no evidence of previously postulated compensatory overexpression of GluN2B. We demonstrate that null variants and misATD+LBD of GRIN2A do not only share the same clinical spectrum (i.e. milder phenotypes), but also result in similar electrophysiological consequences (loss-of-function) opposing those of misTMD+Linker (severe phenotypes; predominantly gain-of-function). This new pathomechanistic model may ultimately help in predicting phenotype severity as well as eligibility for potential precision medicine approaches in GRIN2A-related disorders.
Introduction
N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) are expressed throughout the brain, mediating excitatory neurotransmission important for development, learning, memory, and other higher cognitive functions. NMDAR are di- or tri-heterotetrameric ligand-gated ion channels composed of two glycine-binding GluN1 (encoded by GRIN1) and two glutamate-binding GluN2 subunits (GRIN2A–D) (Traynelis et al., 2010). All GluN subunits are composed of an extracellular, a transmembrane and an intracellular component. The extracellular component consists of the amino-terminal domain (ATD) with binding sites for antagonists such as Zn2+ and the ligand-binding domains (LBD) S1 and S2 specific for agonist binding including glycine and glutamate. The channel pore is formed by the three transmembrane domains (TMD), M1, M3, M4, and a re-entrant pore-loop M2. The C-terminal domain (CTD) is involved in mediating signals within the intracellular compartment. Compared with the ubiquitously expressed GluN1 subunit, the GluN2 subunits show specific spatiotemporal expression profiles throughout the CNS (Paoletti et al., 2013). Whereas GluN2B and GluN2D subunits are predominantly expressed prenatally, expression of GluN2A and GluN2C is low prenatally but significantly increases shortly after birth (Bar-Shira et al., 2015).
Four genes encoding NMDAR subunits (GRIN1, GRIN2A, GRIN2B, and GRIN2D) have so far been linked to human disease; GRIN2A appears to be associated with the broadest and best characterized phenotypic spectrum, including a variety of disorders of the epilepsy aphasia spectrum and developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, such as Landau-Kleffner syndrome and epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spike-and-wave during slow-wave sleep (CSWS) (Lemke et al., 2013,Lesca et al., 2013; Carvill et al., 2013).
GRIN2A is a gene with a significantly reduced number of missense variants in controls compared to the expected number of variants in a similarly sized gene (missense z-score 3.8) (Lek et al., 2016). The ratio of 31.2 expected versus 3 observed null variants in ExAC and the probability of loss-of-function intolerance of 1.00 (pLI score) suggests that GRIN2A null and missense variants strongly reduce evolutionary fitness (Lek et al., 2016).
Investigation of functional consequences of disease-associated GRIN2A missense variants revealed various gain- or loss-of-function effects (Endele et al., 2010; Lesca et al., 2013; Pierson et al., 2014; Swanger et al., 2016; Addis et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2017; Sibarov et al., 2017). Identification of null variants likely leading to GluN2A haploinsufficiency further complicated understanding of underlying pathomechanisms. GluN2A haploinsufficiency is expected to cause reduced expression of GluN2A, which was thought to potentially be compensated for by consecutive upregulation of expression of other GluN subunits, especially GluN2B, leading to an altered NMDAR assembly (Balu and Coyle, 2011). NMDAR containing GluN2B have slower deactivation times than those containing GluN2A (Paoletti et al., 2013; Wyllie et al., 2013). Replacement of GluN2A by GluN2B has thus been hypothesized to increase the duration of activation of the NMDAR suggesting a net gain-of-function effect mediated by GRIN2A null variants.
To delineate the phenotypic spectrum of GRIN2A-related disorders, we reviewed previously reported and newly identified individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in GRIN2A. We provide a comprehensive phenotypic dataset of 248 individuals with variants in GRIN2A and integrate these data with protein domain and electrophysiological data. Specifically, we aimed at elucidating genetic and functional correlates to the wide phenotypic range of GRIN2A-related disorders, for which we reviewed published electrophysiological data and investigated consequences of Grin2a knock-out in cortical rat neurons.
Materials and methods
Cohort recruitment
Data on 92 previously unreported individuals with (likely) pathogenic GRIN2A variants (ENST00000396573) were collected from several diagnostic and research cohorts. Clinical and genetic information were obtained with a specific questionnaire tailored to phenotypes previously reported in individuals with GRIN2A variants (Supplementary Table 1). We also ascertained additional, more detailed phenotypic information on individuals that had previously been published. All information about the listed variants has been added to an open-access online database (www.grin-database.de).
Review of the literature and variant classification
We searched the literature (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) (up to 23 March 2018) for reports of cases with GRIN2A variants and reviewed the associated clinical and genetic information. This study has been approved by the ethics committee of the University of Leipzig (224/16-ek, 402/16-ek).
Based on the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) (Richards et al., 2015; Nykamp et al., 2017), we classified missense variants fulfilling at least one of the following conditions (in addition to constraint and prediction scores) as likely pathogenic:
de novo + absent from controls*
OR confirmative functional studies + absent from controls*
OR de novo + confirmative functional studies
OR present in three or more affected and no healthy individuals of one family + absent from controls*
OR novel missense variant at a location that had been classified as pathogenic according to the above conditions + absent from controls*.
Furthermore, null variants located in exon 3–14 (until amino acid position 838) were classified as (likely) pathogenic.
*Controls were over 120 000 people without severe paediatric disease compiled in the gnomAD browser [genome Aggregation Database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/)]. Only variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic were considered for further genotype-phenotype correlations in this study, regardless of the associated phenotype.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were done with the R programming language (www.r-project.org). Fisher’s exact test for Count Data, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Cochran Armitage test were performed as referenced in the ‘Results’ section. P-values were corrected for multiple testing with the Bonferroni method. For Fisher’s exact test, we reported odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). To investigate variant clustering in different phenotypes, we calculated the distance (linear amino acid sequence) of all possible variant pairs of individuals with the same intellectual disability/developmental delay (ID/DD) phenotypes to all combinations of different ID/DD phenotypes (mild versus severe). We compared the variant distances of same versus different phenotypes with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. The R code used to perform the statistical analyses and figures is available upon request.
Ranking severity of intellectual disability/developmental delay
We identified 178 individuals with detailed information about the presence or absence of ID/DD and apportioned categories reflecting the severity of the phenotype according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5): no ID/DD (0 points), mild ID/DD (1 point), moderate ID/DD (2 points), severe ID/DD (3 points), and profound ID/DD (4 points) (Supplementary Table 4). The terms ID and DD are used interchangeably here.
Neuronal culture, generation of the Grin2a−/− rat and RNA quantification
Cortical rat neurons were cultured as described (Baxter et al., 2011) at a density of between 9–13 × 104 neurons per cm2 from embryonic Day 20.5 rats with NeurobasalTM growth medium supplemented with B27 (Invitrogen). Experiments were performed at days in vitro (DIV) 7–16, as indicated.
To generate the Grin2a−/− rat, single cell Long Evans Hooded rat embryos underwent pronuclear microinjection of mRNA encoding the enzyme Cas9 and small guide RNAs (sgRNA) binding to the 5′ and 3′ end of exon 8 of Grin2a, before being implanted into pseudopregnant mothers. The resulting live births were screened by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for genomic deletions due to repair by non-homologous end joining of double-stranded breaks targeted to either side of exon 8. A 1065 bp deletion spanning exon 8 (which encodes key pore forming domains of GluN2A) was identified, and confirmed by sequencing (data not shown). Genotyping was carried out using primer pairs P1 (AGGGAAGAAGGGAACAGGAG) with P2 (TCTCTGGGATTCAGTGCAGA) and P3 (AAGGCAGAGAGAGAGACAAAG) with P4 (ATGGCAGTTCCCAGTAGCAT). P1 and P3 bind to the 5′ end of the deletion, P2 binds to the 3′ end of the deletion, and P4 binds within the deletion. The sgRNA design and generation of the founder animals was performed by Horizon Discovery Group plc. All the experiments were performed using wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous littermate matched animals. Animals were treated and all experiments performed in accordance with UK Animal Scientific Procedures Act (1986) following local ethical review.
RNA was isolated from cultured neurons using the Roche High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (including DNase treatment), according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Roche). Three wells from a 24-well plate were pooled for each animal. cDNA was synthesized from 13 µg RNA using a Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, then stored at −20°C. For real time PCR (RT-PCR), cDNA was diluted to the equivalent of 6 ng of initial RNA per 15 µl qPCR reaction, per gene of interest. RT-PCR was performed in a Stratagene Mx3000P QPCR System (Agilent Technologies), using the FS universal SYBR Green MasterRox mix (Roche), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The required amount of template was mixed with water, SYBR Green MasterRox mix and forward and reverse primers (200 nM each final concentration) to the required reaction volume. Primers used were: Grin2a: AGCCAGAGACCCCGCTAC and TGGGGTGCACCTGGTAAC; Gadph: AGAAGGCTGGGGCTCACC and AGTTGGTGGTGCAGGATGC. Technical replicates as well as no template and no reverse transcription negative controls were included. The quantitative reverse transcriptase (qRT)-PCR cycling programme was 10 min at 95°C, then 40 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 40 s at 60°C, with detection of fluorescence and 1 min at 72°C, followed by one cycle (for dissociation curve) of 1 min at 95°C, and 30 s at 55°C, with a ramp up to 30 s at 95°C, (ramp rate: 0.2°C/s) with continuous detection of fluorescence on the 55–95°C ramp. Data were normalized to Gadph expression.
Cell culture electrophysiological recording and analysis
Coverslips containing cortical neurons were transferred to a recording chamber perfused (at a flow rate of 3–5 ml/min) with an external recording solution composed of (in mM): 150 NaCl, 2.8 KCl, 10 HEPES, 2 CaCl2, 10 glucose and 0.1 glycine, pH 7.3 (320–330 mOsm). Tetrodotoxin (300 nM) was included to block action-potential driven excitatory events. Patch pipettes were made from thick-walled borosilicate glass (Harvard Apparatus) and filled with a K-gluconate-based internal solution containing (in mM): potassium gluconate 141, NaCl 2.5, HEPES 10, EGTA 11; pH 7.3 with KOH. Electrode tips were fire-polished for a final resistance ranging between 3–5 MΩ. All NMDAR currents were evoked by 150 µM NMDA and 100 µM glycine, both applied using a perfusion system. Currents were recorded at room temperature (21 ± 2°C) using an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices). Neurons were voltage-clamped at −65 mV and recordings were rejected if the holding current was >−100 pA or if the series resistance drifted by >20% of its initial value (<20 MΩ). Whole-cell currents were analysed using WinEDR v3.2 software (John Dempster, University of Strathclyde, UK). To determine the ifenprodil sensitivity of neurons, whole-cell NMDAR currents were recorded followed by the inclusion of 3 µM ifenprodil in the recording solution for a blocking period of 90 s. The whole-cell NMDAR current was reassessed with 3 µM ifenprodil included, and the % block was calculated. To determine spermine potentiation, neurons were voltage-clamped at −30 mV and switched to a low sodium recording solution composed of (in mM): 70 NaCl, 60 choline chloride, 2.8 KCl, 20 HEPES, 10 glucose, 0.1 glycine, 0.1 diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, pH 6.5 with NaOH. NMDA currents were evoked by 150 µM NMDA then reassessed in the presence of 100 µM spermine. Only cells with NMDA-evoked currents >40 pA were included.
Western blotting
Neurons were lysed in 1.5× lithium dodecyl sulphate sample buffer (NuPage, Life Technologies) and boiled at 100°C for 10 min. Approximately 10 µg of protein was loaded onto a precast gradient gel (4–12%) and subjected to electrophoresis. Briefly, western blotting onto a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane was then carried out using the Xcell SureLock™ system (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Following the protein transfer, the PVDF membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 5% (w/v) non-fat dried milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20. The membranes were incubated at 4°C overnight with the primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution: anti-GluN2A (N-terminus, 1:1000, Invitrogen), and anti-beta actin (1:200 000, Abcam) or anti-GluN2B C-terminus (1:8000, BD Biosciences) and anti-beta actin. For visualization of western blots, horseradish peroxidase-based secondary antibodies were used followed by chemiluminescent detection on Kodak® X-Omat film.
Data availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its Supplementary material.
Results
We reviewed data on 92 unpublished individuals with (likely) pathogenic GRIN2A variants with systemically assessed phenotypes. After re-evaluation of all published GRIN2A variants based on ACMG recommendations (Richards et al., 2015; Nykamp et al., 2017), we additionally included 156 previously reported individuals with (likely) pathogenic variants. Thus, we were able to collectively review genotypes and phenotypes of 248 individuals with GRIN2A-related disorders.
The cohort
In our cohort, 45.1% of individuals whose gender was known were female (n = 87) and 54.9% were male (n = 106). Gender was unknown in 55 cases. The youngest individual was 11 months at evaluation, the oldest 71 years (median 8 years). Of the 248 individuals, 121 (121/248; 48.8%) were single cases, including 65 individuals (65/121; 53.7%) where a de novo confirmation of the variant was performed. The remaining 127 individuals (127/248; 51.2%) were found in 36 different families.
Among 3038 individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders with epilepsy screened by epilepsy panel sequencing (covering GRIN2A) in the same diagnostic lab, seven displayed (likely) pathogenic variants revealing a prevalence of 0.23% in this disease spectrum.
Variant type and distribution
One hundred and forty-five individuals (145/248; 58.5%) had likely protein-truncating variants referred to as null variants including 35 individuals (35/145; 24.1%) with nonsense variants, 23 individuals (23/145; 15.9%) with small frameshift deletions or duplications, 42 individuals (42/145; 29.0%) with canonical splice-site variants, three individuals (3/145; 2.1%) with a loss-of-start codon, 37 individuals (37/145; 25.5%) with gross deletions or duplications spanning up to the whole gene but not affecting adjacent genes and five individuals (5/145; 3.4%) with complex chromosomal rearrangements disrupting GRIN2A (Fig. 1A). A total of 53 different null variants were considered (likely) pathogenic, of which 22 were recurrent.
The remaining 103 individuals (103/248; 41.5%) had missense variants, including 13 individuals (13/103; 12.6%) with variants in the extracellular amino-terminal domain and 56 individuals (56/103; 54.4%) with variants in the extracellular ligand-binding domain S1 or S2, all of which are referred to as misATD+LBD (for protein domains, see Supplementary Table 5). In addition, six individuals (6/103; 5.8%) had variants in linker regions and 28 individuals (28/103; 27.2%) had variants in the three transmembrane domains, M2–M4, referred to as misTMD+Linker. No variants affecting the C-terminus met ACMG criteria of being (likely) pathogenic (Fig. 1B). A total of 44 different missense variants were considered (likely) pathogenic, of which 23 were recurrent.
Intellectual disability/developmental delay
In our GRIN2A cohort, cognitive assessment was available on 177 individuals, of which 111 (111/177; 62.7%) had ID/DD. In 35 cases (35/177; 19.8%), the severity of ID/DD could not be specified in more detail. Among the 177 individuals, the level of ID/DD was mild in 35 cases (35/177; 19.8%), moderate in 17 (17/177; 9.6%), severe in eight (8/177; 4.5%) and profound in 16 (16/177; 9.0%). Sixty-six individuals (66/177; 37.3%) had normal intelligence (Fig. 2A).
Seizures and electroencephalography
Information on the epilepsy phenotype was available in 219 cases. The majority of patients (192/219; 87.7%) had seizures, including 121 individuals (121/219; 55.3%) with focal seizures (with or without evolution to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures). Twenty-one individuals (21/219; 9.6%) had tonic-clonic seizures of unknown onset, four (4/219; 1.8%) epileptic spasms and 46 cases (46/219; 21.0%) had unspecified seizures. Several individuals displayed a spectrum of different seizure types. Twenty-seven individuals (27/219; 12.3%) did not have seizures (Fig. 2B).
EEG information was available in 152 individuals, including 143 individuals (143/152; 94.1%) displaying epileptiform discharges. In 86 cases (86/152; 56.6%), focal discharges were recorded, of whom 34 cases (34/152; 22.4%) had centrotemporal spikes and 28 cases (28/152; 18.4%) had multifocal discharges. Fifty-one individuals (51/152; 33.6%) had CSWS and six individuals (6/152; 3.9%) had generalized discharges. Only nine individuals (9/152; 5.9%) had a normal EEG (Fig. 2C).
Recognizable epilepsy syndromes comprised the known spectrum of GRIN2A-associated epilepsy syndromes, such as benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes, atypical childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes and Landau-Kleffner syndrome.
Language and speech disorders
Information about speech phenotypes was available in 140 cases. The vast majority of individuals presented with speech disorders (129/140; 92.1%). In 115 patients where the type of speech disorder was defined, 55 individuals (55/140; 39.3%) had moderate speech/language impairment including dysarthria, speech dyspraxia, dysphasia, speech regression with residual impairments, sometimes supplemented by minor impairments such as impaired pitch, hypernasality or imprecise articulation. Twenty-six individuals (26/140; 18.6%) had aphasia (including speech regression with loss of speech) and 26 (26/140; 18.6%) had isolated delay of speech development. Eight individuals (8/140; 5.7%) presented with temporary speech regression. The type of speech disorder was not further specified in 14 individuals (14/140; 10.0%). Only 11 individuals (11/140; 7.9%) had normal speech development. Speech disorders were not necessarily linked to EEG abnormalities as 10/11 individuals with normal speech development had abnormal EEG and eight of nine individuals with normal EEG still had abnormal speech development (only one individual had normal speech, normal EEG, no epilepsy, no ID/DD) (Fig. 2D).
Other neurological and psychiatric phenotypes
Information about tone was available in 139 cases. Forty (40/139; 28.8%) individuals had hypotonia, including 18 individuals (18/139; 13.0%) with no further specification. Among the remaining 22 individuals, 16 (16/139; 11.5%) had mild, two had moderate (2/139; 1.4%) and four individuals (4/139; 2.9%) had severe hypotonia (including one individual with arthrogryposis). Ninety-nine individuals (99/139; 71.2%) had no hypotonia (Supplementary Fig. 2A). We identified 19 (19/72; 26.4%) individuals with movement disorders including ataxia (n = 10), dystonic/spastic/choreatic movement disorders (n = 8), including two individuals with complex movement disorders (n = 2; Individual 039: no ambulation, spasticity, sometimes dystonic, choreatic, athethotic movements; Individual 058: involuntary movements, paroxysmal dyskinesia, movement abnormality of the tongue, abnormality of eye movement, impaired smooth pursuit), and an unspecified movement disorder (n = 1) (Supplementary Fig. 2B). Information about neuropsychiatric comorbidities was available in 70 cases. Seventeen individuals (17/70; 24.3%) displayed behavioural or psychiatric disorders, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (n = 6), autism spectrum disorder (n = 6), schizophrenia (n = 2) and anxiety disorder (n = 1). Two individuals had unspecified behavioural abnormalities.
MRI
Brain MRI data were available for 85 individuals. Approximately 14% (12/85; 14.1%) had brain abnormalities, comprising a variety of findings including focal cortical dysplasia, dysplastic corpus callosum with delayed myelinisation, hypoplasia of corpus callosum with midline lipoma, hippocampal hyperintensity, hippocampal sclerosis, heterotopia, subcortical lesion, hypoplastic olfactory bulb, cerebellar glioma, enlarged Virchow-Robin spaces, delayed myelinization (n = 1 for each). An additional 11% of individuals (9/85; 10.6%) had generalized volume loss compatible with brain atrophy. Abnormal gyral pattern similar to some cases with GRIN1- and GRIN2B-related disorders was not observed (Platzer et al., 2017; Fry et al., 2018) and was also not expected in GRIN2A-related disorders as knockdown of only GluN1 and GluN2B (but not GluN2A) have been shown to slow down neuronal migration (Jiang et al., 2015). Sixty-four individuals (64/85; 75.3%) had no MRI abnormalities (Supplementary Fig. 2C).
Genotype–phenotype correlations reveal two distinct phenotype groups
For 177 of all 248 individuals with (likely) pathogenic variants in GRIN2A, we obtained detailed information about presence or absence of ID/DD and ranked severity of intellectual disability into five categories (refer to the ‘Materials and methods’ section).
Comparing 70 individuals with missense and 107 with null variants, we found more severe ID/DD in carriers of missense variants (Cochran Armitage Test, P-value = 0.00011). However, individuals with missense variants displayed a bimodal distribution of ID/DD severity (Fig. 3A). We compared spatial variant clustering in individuals with same severity of ID/DD compared to variant clustering in individuals with mixed severity of ID/DD (Wilcoxon Rank test, comparing severe to mixed ID/DD cases P-value = 2 × 10−6, comparing mild to mixed ID/DD cases: P-value = 0.5) suggesting missense variants in different parts of the protein lead to distinct ID/DD phenotypes. We observed that 19 individuals with misTMD+Linker had more severe phenotypes than 33 individuals with misATD+LBD (Fig. 3B). To test this observation statistically, we randomly separated missense carriers into a discovery cohort (n = 35) and a validation cohort (n = 17). In the discovery cohort (Cochran Armitage Test, P = 10−6) as well as the validation cohort (Cochran Armitage Test, P = 0.0003), carriers of misTMD+Linker had significantly more severe ranked ID/DD (mediandiscovery 4, medianvalidation 4) than carriers of misATD+LBD (mediandiscovery 0, medianvalidation 0). Accordingly, 32 of 32 misTMD+Linker were de novo, while 18 of 47 misATD+LBD were de novo (Fisher’s exact test, OR Inf, 95% CI 11 to Inf, P-value = 2 × 10−9). Other variants were inherited; unknown variants were excluded from the test.
Notably, carriers of the 107 null variants had a similar degree of ID (median 1, mild ID) compared to carriers of misATD+LBD (median 0 corresponding to no ID, Cochran Armitage Test, P-value = 0.3). Furthermore, all 66 individuals with normal intellect were carriers of misATD+LBD or null variants.
We found significant differences for other phenotypes only between individuals with misTMD+Linker and those with misATD+LBD or null variants but not between those with misATD+LBD and null variants (Fig. 4, all phenotype comparisons in Fig. 4 were done with Fisher’s exact test). Although we observed no difference for presence of epilepsy in individuals with misTMD+Linker and individuals with misATD+LBD or null variants (Fisher’s exact test, P-value = 0.54), we found significant differences with respect to seizure type as epileptic spasms were only observed in individuals with misTMD+Linker, but not in individuals with misATD+LBD or null variants (Fisher’s exact test, P-value = 2.6 × 10−6). There were also significantly more cases with focal seizures in the cohort with misATD+LBD/null variants than in the misTMD+Linker cohort (Fisher’s exact test, P-value = 4.1 × 10−4, OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.9 to 15.7). There were no significant differences for generalized seizures (Fisher’s exact test, P-value = 1.0) or for particular EEG patterns. All individuals with generalized volume loss on MRI were carriers of misTMD+Linker (Fisher’s exact test, P-value = 0.002, OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.7 to 21.3), while this feature was not observed in any carrier of misATD+LBD/null variants.
Variance of ID/DD phenotype in individuals with the same genetic variant
We investigated whether individuals with the same genetic variant had similar ID/DD phenotypes (see ‘Materials and methods’ section for classification). We investigated 98 individuals carrying 24 unique variants where ID/DD phenotypes were available in at least two individuals per variant (Fig. 5). The mean variance of ID/DD phenotypes per variant was 0.65 (±0.64 standard deviation, SD). Permuting family labels 10 000 times, we found that the real value was lower than the mean variance in 15 of 10 000 permutations (Supplementary Fig. 2, empirical P-value = 0.0016). This suggests that while considerable phenotype expressivity exists, the same variant leads to similar ID/DD phenotypes. However, more and better ID/DD data (e.g. measured as IQ) is needed to optimally study phenotype expressivity.
Both phenotype groups correspond to opposing electrophysiological consequences
Of the 44 (likely) pathogenic missense variants included in this study (ATD: n = 4, LBD: n = 20, TMD: n = 16, Linker: n = 4), 23 (equalling 52%) had been functionally investigated previously (ATD: n = 3, LBD: n = 14, TMD2–4: n = 1 each, Linker: n = 3). We compared the published functional data of all 23 missense variants (Supplementary Table 3) (Endele et al., 2010; Lesca et al., 2013; Pierson et al., 2014; Serraz et al., 2016; Swanger et al., 2016; Addis et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2017; Ogden et al., 2017; Sibarov et al., 2017; XiangWei et al., 2018). The 23 variants comprised six misTMD+Linker variants displaying predominantly gain-of-function effects (5× gain-of-function versus 1× loss-of-function), while all 17 extracellular misATD+LBD variants show exclusively loss-of-function activity (Fisher’s exact test, P-value = 2 × 10−4, OR Inf, 95% CI 5.3 to Inf). We conclude that these opposing electrophysiological consequences are the most likely explanation for the significantly different degree of severity of ID/DD as well as other phenotypic differences associated with misATD+LBD and misTMD+Linker. The currently single exception to this pattern, the loss-of-function misTMD+Linker variant c.1642G>A, p.(Ala548Thr), was found in an individual with moderate ID. In total, 32 of 34 individuals with misTMD+Linker had de novo variants, while two were of unknown origin. On the other hand, the majority of the variants in other regions were inherited.
Rat model and electrophysiological analysis
Our phenotypic data suggest that the clinical consequences of GRIN2A null variants are similar to the clinical consequences of misATD+LBD loss-of-function variants. However, it has previously been hypothesized that GRIN2A null variants could ultimately result in NMDAR with gain-of-function (or altered function) through compensatory increased expression of other NMDAR subunits, particularly GRIN2B. We therefore sought to determine whether homozygous or heterozygous loss of Grin2a results in compensatory upregulation of Grin2b expression. We used a newly created Grin2a knockout rat, and compared NMDAR currents in cortical neurons cultured from these rats with those from their wild-type and heterozygous littermates (litters generated by Het-Het crosses) (Fig. 6A). In this model, there is no detectable compensatory increase in the expression level of GluN2B protein (Fig. 6B). We analysed NMDAR currents at two developmental stages: after 7–8 DIV when currents are almost exclusively GluN2B-dominated, and at 15–16 DIV when there is a significant proportion of GluN2A-containing NMDARs (Supplementary Fig. 3) (Edman et al., 2012). Analysis of NMDAR current density at 7–8 DIV revealed no genotype-dependent difference, consistent with the near-exclusive presence of GluN2B-containing diheteromeric NMDARs (Fig. 6C). Analysis of currents at 15–16 DIV showed an age-dependent increase of currents, as expected, but also a deficit in currents in Grin2a+/− and Grin2a−/− neurons, relative to wild-type. This suggests that any compensation of GluN2A deficiency through an increase in other NMDAR subunits is insufficient to rescue currents to wild-type levels.
We next investigated whether there was any evidence of compensation through GluN2B upregulation that could be detected via electrophysiological assessment. If there was compensation, then the magnitude of whole cell currents dependent on GluN2B would be expected to be higher in Grin2a+/− and Grin2a−/− neurons, relative to wild-type, at 15–16 DIV. We measured the portion of the whole cell currents sensitive to the GluN2B-selective antagonist ifenprodil (Fig. 6D), but found no difference in the magnitude of ifenprodil-sensitive current at 15–16 DIV (or 7–8 DIV). Nevertheless, the percentage of total NMDAR currents sensitive to ifenprodil block was increased in Grin2a−/− neurons as would be expected for neurons where GluN2A expression is absent (Fig. 6E). Thus, within this experimental system, there appears to be no evidence for increases in GluN2B expression to compensate for loss of GluN2A expression due to Grin2a allelic deletion.
Discussion
We present a comprehensive investigation of GRIN2A-related phenotypes, comprising 248 affected individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in GRIN2A.
Variant distribution
We observed a clustering of disease-causing missense variants in the highly conserved ligand-binding domains S1 and S2 as well as transmembrane and linker domains, which is similar to our previous observations in GRIN1 and GRIN2B (Lemke et al., 2016; Platzer et al., 2017) and may assist in predicting pathogenicity of variants of uncertain significance by its location (Fig. 1). No missense variants in the intracellular C-terminal domain of GluN2A (beyond amino acid position 838) have been found to fulfil ACMG criteria for being pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Previous reports of alleged disease-associated C-terminal variants may therefore be revised, as this region is also the only region in GRIN2A that shows no evidence of regional depletion as the number of observed variants in ExAC was not higher than expected by a mutational model (Lek et al., 2016; Samocha, 2017), similar to GluN1 and GluN2B (Lemke et al., 2016; Platzer et al., 2017). As the C-terminus of GluN2A is tolerant to genetic variation in the general population, we conclude that most missense variants in the C-terminus likely have no effects.
Phenotypic range
Our comprehensive analysis shows that the GRIN2A-related phenotypic spectrum does not only comprise well established epilepsy-aphasia disorders, but is much broader and ranges from normal or near-normal development to non-specific developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Notably, only three individuals had an apparently normal phenotype with no ID, no epilepsy and no speech disorder (two of them also had EEG investigation, both with normal result), and all were relatives of more severely affected individuals. Moreover, five individuals with (likely) pathogenic variants are listed in gnomAD and can therefore also be considered normal, even though very minor phenotypic abnormalities cannot be excluded. Thus, reduced penetrance appears to be possible but not a common phenomenon among carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic GRIN2A variants. Epilepsy and speech disorders seen in >80% of individuals occur independent of intellectual disability, which is present in 62.7% of individuals and was mild in nearly half of those cases. This is in stark contrast to phenotypes related to GRIN1, GRIN2B and GRIN2D that are associated with marked ID in nearly 100% of cases (Lemke et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016; Platzer et al., 2017). Among all currently known GRIN-associated phenotypes, GRIN2A-related disorders display the most recognizable epilepsy spectrum, comprising focal or multifocal epilepsy with or without centrotemporal spikes as well as CSWS (Fig. 2). As normal and near-normal development are part of the phenotypic range, it can be assumed that individuals with milder phenotypes are more likely to pass on their pathogenic variants, which may explain why 60.2% of variants of known origin are inherited and do not exclusively occur de novo, as is the rule for disorders related to GRIN1, GRIN2B and GRIN2D (Lemke et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016; Platzer et al., 2017).
Genotype–phenotype correlation
In contrast to previous studies (Myers and Scheffer, 1993), our systematic analyses of phenotype and molecular data of a large cohort of individuals with GRIN2A variants identified two distinct phenotype groups corresponding to the location of variants in different protein domains (Fig. 4). MisTMD+Linker are associated with severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy phenotypes, whereas misATD+LBD are associated with speech abnormalities and/or seizures with mild to no ID only. Strikingly, both phenotypic groups are significantly correlated with opposing electrophysiological consequences of the NMDAR, even though the complex functional alterations caused by a GRIN2A variant cannot always easily be reduced to a binary description such as loss- or gain-of-function. It appears plausible that misLBD may impede agonist binding and thus reduce channel activity, whereas a misTMD+Linker may affect formation of the ion channel pore mediating a gain-of-function effect by e.g. disrupted channel inhibition by Mg2+ (Pierson et al., 2014; Swanger et al., 2016; Addis et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2017). However, more electrophysiology data of mutated NMDAR are needed to clarify exact pathomechanisms of variants in the different protein domains.
Pathomechanistic model
We observed that individuals with extracellular misATD+LBD (displaying exclusively loss-of-function effects) have a comparable phenotypic range to individuals with null variants, which is substantially less severe than the phenotypes of individuals with membrane-associated misTMD+Linker (displaying predominantly gain-of-function effects). We therefore hypothesize that loss-of-function misATD+LBD and null variants mediate similar pathomechanistic effects.
In agreement with our phenotype data but in contrast to previous hypotheses, we observed that Grin2a−/+ and Grin2a−/− cultured rat neurons show lower current density, indicating that any compensatory increase in expression of other GluN subunits is not sufficient to match the current normally mediated by GluN2A-containing NMDAR in rats. Furthermore, application of the GluN2B-specific blocker ifenprodil to these neurons did not give any evidence of compensatory increase of GluN2B in NMDAR assembly in GluN2A-deficient cells. Our data thus contradict the hypothesis of a compensatory gain-of-function effect due to GluN2A haploinsufficiency and in fact suggest loss-of-function, in agreement with our phenotype-based observations. Namely, GRIN2A null variants are associated with comparable clinical consequences as misATD+LBD (resulting in loss-of-function) and with markedly less severe clinical consequences than misTMD+Linker (resulting predominantly in gain-of-function). With our pathomechanistic model, we predict that individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy due to misTMD+Linker are prone to having an underlying gain of NMDAR function and represent promising candidates for treatment with NMDAR blockers, such as memantine (Pierson et al., 2014). However, currently there are still little data available on clinical treatment of GRIN2A-related disorders with memantine (Pierson et al., 2014). Conversely, individuals with variants leading to complete or partial loss of channel function (misATD+LBD or null variants) may potentially respond to positive allosteric modulators of the NMDAR (Zhu and Paoletti, 2015; Addis et al., 2017).
Our study illustrates how systematically investigating clinical phenotypes in a large cohort of individuals with a monogenic disease cannot only reveal novel genotype-phenotype correlations, but also contribute to a better understanding of the underlying functional mechanisms being a prerequisite for the development of precision medicine approaches.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank J. McQueen for providing the data illustrated in Fig. 6B. We thank G. Derksen-Lubsen, T. Dijkhuizen, N. Doornebal, F.E. Jansen, E.K. Vanhoutte for their support and helpful discussion.
Glossary
Abbreviations
- ACMG
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
- ATD
amino-terminal domain
- DD
developmental delay
- ID
intellectual disability
- LBD
ligand-binding domain
- NMDAR
N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors
- TMD
transmembrane domain
Appendix 1
GRIN2A study group
Full affiliation details are available in the Supplementary material.
Alexis Arzimanoglou, Paul B. Augustijn, Patrick Van Bogaert, Helene Bourry, Peter Burfeind, Yoyo Chu, Brian Chung, Diane Doummar, Patrick Edery, Aviva Fattal-Valevski, Mélanie Fradin, Marion Gerard, Christa de Geus, Boudewijn Gunning, Danielle Hasaerts, Ingo Helbig, Katherine L. Helbig, Rami Jamra, Mélanie Jennesson Lyver, Jolien S. Klein Wassink-Ruiter, David A. Koolen, Damien Lederer, Roelineke J. Lunsing, Mikaël Mathot, Hélène Maurey, Shay Menascu, Anne Michel, Ghayda Mirzaa, Diana Mitter, Hiltrud Muhle, Rikke S. Møller, Caroline Nava, Margaret O’Brien, Evelyn van Pinxteren-Nagler, Anne van Riesen, Christelle Rougeot, Damien Sanlaville, Jolanda H. Schieving, Steffen Syrbe, Hermine E. Veenstra-Knol, Nienke Verbeek, Dorothée Ville, Yvonne J. Vos, Pascal Vrielynck, Sabrina Wagner, Sarah Weckhuysen, Marjolein H. Willemsen.
Contributor Information
GRIN2A study group:
Alexis Arzimanoglou, Paul B Augustijn, Patrick Van Bogaert, Helene Bourry, Peter Burfeind, Yoyo Chu, Brian Chung, Diane Doummar, Patrick Edery, Aviva Fattal-Valevski, Mélanie Fradin, Marion Gerard, Christa de Geus, Boudewijn Gunning, Danielle Hasaerts, Ingo Helbig, Katherine L Helbig, Rami Jamra, Mélanie Jennesson Lyver, Jolien S Klein Wassink-Ruiter, David A Koolen, Damien Lederer, Roelineke J Lunsing, Mikaël Mathot, Hélène Maurey, Shay Menascu, Anne Michel, Ghayda Mirzaa, Diana Mitter, Hiltrud Muhle, Rikke S Møller, Caroline Nava, Margaret O’Brien, Evelyn van Pinxteren-Nagler, Anne van Riesen, Christelle Rougeot, Damien Sanlaville, Jolanda H Schieving, Steffen Syrbe, Hermine E Veenstra-Knol, Nienke Verbeek, Dorothée Ville, Yvonne J Vos, Pascal Vrielynck, Sabrina Wagner, Sarah Weckhuysen, and Marjolein H Willemsen
Funding
H.O.H. was supported by stipends of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), (FKZ: 01EO1501) and the German Research Foundation, (DFG HE7987/1-1/1-2). KFMM was supported by a Wellcome Trust Clinical PhD Fellowship (102838). G.M. was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, (NINDS K08NS092898) and Jordan’s Guardian Angels. IH was supported by intramural funds of the University of Kiel, the German Research Foundation (DFG HE5415/3-1) within the EuroEPINOMICS framework of the European Science Foundation (DFG HE5415/5-1/6-1). Generation of the Grin2a−/− rat was supported by funds from the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India.
Competing interests
The authors report no competing interests.
References
- Addis L, Virdee JK, Vidler LR, Collier DA, Pal DK, Ursu D. Epilepsy-associated GRIN2A mutations reduce NMDA receptor trafficking and agonist potency–molecular profiling and functional rescue. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balu DT, Coyle JT. Glutamate receptor composition of the post-synaptic density is altered in genetic mouse models of NMDA receptor hypo–and hyperfunction. Brain Res 2011; 1392: 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bar-Shira O, Maor R, Chechik G. Gene expression switching of receptor subunits in human brain development. PLoS Comput Biol 2015; 11: e1004559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baxter PS, Martel MA, McMahon A, Kind PC, Hardingham GE. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide induces long-lasting neuroprotection through the induction of activity-dependent signaling via the cyclic AMP response element-binding protein-regulated transcription co-activator 1. J Neurochem 2011; 118: 365–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carvill GL, Regan BM, Yendle SC, O’Roak BJ, Lozovaya N, Bruneau N et al. . GRIN2A mutations cause epilepsy-aphasia spectrum disorders. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 1073–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen W, Tankovic A, Burger PB, Kusumoto H, Traynelis SF, Yuan H. Functional evaluation of a de novo GRIN2A mutation identified in a patient with profound global developmental delay and refractory epilepsy. Mol Pharmacol 2017; 91: 317–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edman S, McKay S, Macdonald LJ, Samadi M, Livesey MR, Hardingham GE et al. . TCN 201 selectively blocks GluN2A-containing NMDARs in a GluN1 co-agonist dependent but non-competitive manner. Neuropharmacology 2012; 63: 441–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Endele S, Rosenberger G, Geider K, Popp B, Tamer C, Stefanova I et al. . Mutations in GRIN2A and GRIN2B encoding regulatory subunits of NMDA receptors cause variable neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Nat Genet 2010; 42: 1021–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fry AE, Fawcett KA, Zelnik N, Yuan H, Thompson BAN, Shemer-Meiri L et al. . De novo mutations in GRIN1 cause extensive bilateral polymicrogyria. Brain 2018; 141: 698–712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang H, Jiang W, Zou J, Wang B, Yu M, Pan Y et al. . The GluN2B subunit of N-methy-D-asparate receptor regulates the radial migration of cortical neurons in vivo. Brain Res 2015; 1610: 20–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, Samocha KE, Banks E, Fennell T et al. . Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60 706 humans. Nature 2016; 536: 285–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lemke JR, Geider K, Helbig KL, Heyne HO, Schutz H, Hentschel J et al. . Delineating the GRIN1 phenotypic spectrum: a distinct genetic NMDA receptor encephalopathy. Neurology 2016; 86: 2171–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lemke JR, Lal D, Reinthaler EM, Steiner I, Nothnagel M, Alber M et al. . Mutations in GRIN2A cause idiopathic focal epilepsy with rolandic spikes. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 1067–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lesca G, Rudolf G, Bruneau N, Lozovaya N, Labalme A, Boutry-Kryza N et al. . GRIN2A mutations in acquired epileptic aphasia and related childhood focal epilepsies and encephalopathies with speech and language dysfunction. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 1061–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li D, Yuan H, Ortiz-Gonzalez XR, Marsh ED, Tian L, McCormick EM et al. . GRIN2D Recurrent de novo dominant mutation causes a severe epileptic encephalopathy treatable with NMDA receptor channel blockers. Am J Hum Genet 2016; 99: 802–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myers KA, Scheffer IE. GRIN2A-related speech disorders and epilepsy. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K et al. editors. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle, WA: University of Washington; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Nykamp K, Anderson M, Powers M, Garcia J, Herrera B, Ho YY et al. . Sherloc: a comprehensive refinement of the ACMG-AMP variant classification criteria. Genet Med 2017; 19: 1105–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogden KK, Chen W, Swanger SA, McDaniel MJ, Fan LZ, Hu C et al. . Molecular mechanism of disease-associated mutations in the Pre-M1 helix of NMDA receptors and potential rescue pharmacology. PLoS Genet 2017; 13: e1006536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paoletti P, Bellone C, Zhou Q. NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013; 14: 383–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pierson TM, Yuan H, Marsh ED, Fuentes-Fajardo K, Adams DR, Markello T et al. . GRIN2A mutation and early-onset epileptic encephalopathy: personalized therapy with memantine. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2014; 1: 190–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Platzer K, Yuan H, Schutz H, Winschel A, Chen W, Hu C et al. . GRIN2B encephalopathy: novel findings on phenotype, variant clustering, functional consequences and treatment aspects. J Med Genet 2017; 54: 460–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J et al. . Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology. Genet Med 2015; 17: 405–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samocha KE. Regional missense constraint improves variant deleteriousness prediction. bioRxiv 2017; doi: 10.1101/148353. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/06/12/148353. [Google Scholar]
- Serraz B, Grand T, Paoletti P. Altered zinc sensitivity of NMDA receptors harboring clinically-relevant mutations. Neuropharmacology 2016; 109: 196–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sibarov DA, Bruneau N, Antonov SM, Szepetowski P, Burnashev N, Giniatullin R. Functional properties of human NMDA receptors associated with epilepsy-related mutations of GluN2A subunit. Front Cell Neurosci 2017; 11: 155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swanger SA, Chen W, Wells G, Burger PB, Tankovic A, Bhattacharya S et al. . Mechanistic insight into NMDA receptor dysregulation by rare variants in the GluN2A and GluN2B agonist binding domains. Am J Hum Genet 2016; 99: 1261–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Traynelis SF, Wollmuth LP, McBain CJ, Menniti FS, Vance KM, Ogden KK et al. . Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev 2010; 62: 405–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wyllie DJ, Livesey MR, Hardingham GE. Influence of GluN2 subunit identity on NMDA receptor function. Neuropharmacology 2013; 74: 4–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- XiangWei W, Jiang Y, Yuan H. De novo mutations and rare variants occurring in NMDA receptors. Curr Opin Physiol 2018; 2: 27–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu S, Paoletti P. Allosteric modulators of NMDA receptors: multiple sites and mechanisms. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2015; 20: 14–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its Supplementary material.