Abstract
Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is unique among enteroviruses because of the ability to cause severe respiratory disease as well as neurological disease. We developed separate models of respiratory and neurological disease following EVD68 infection in AG129 mice that respond to antiviral treatment with guanidine. In four-week-old mice infected intransally, EV-D68 replicates to high titers in lung tissue increasing the proinflammatory cytokines MCP-1 and IL-6. The respiratory infection also produces an acute viremia. In 10-day-old mice infected intraperitoneally, EV-D68 causes a neurological disease with weight-loss, paralysis, and mortality. In our respiratory model, treatment with guanidine provides a two-log reduction in lung virus titers, reduces MCP-1 and IL-6, and prevents histological lesions in the lungs. Importantly, viremia is prevented by early treatment with guanidine. In our neurological model, guanidine treatment protects mice from weight-loss, paralysis, and mortality. These results demonstrate the utility of these models for evaluation of antiviral therapies for EV-D68 infection.
Keywords: Enterovirus D68, Animal Model, Respiratory Disease, Neurological Disease, Acute Flaccid Myelitis, Antiviral, Guanidine
Introduction
Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is a non-enveloped, single-stranded, positive sense RNA virus of the family Picornaviridae. Despite identification in 1962, disease outbreaks were not widely reported until the early 2000s. Beginning with an outbreak of severe acute respiratory disease in the Philippines in 2008–2009, an increase in confirmed cases of EV-D68 infection in children led to the classification of EV-D68 as a re-emerging pathogen (1). In the late summer and early fall of 2014 an outbreak of EV-D68 occurred in the United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), laboratories confirmed a total of 1,153 cases of EV-D68 respiratory infection in 49 states and the District of Columbia (2). Despite being the largest outbreak of EV-D68 ever recorded, it is likely that millions were infected but never tested (3). Retrospective studies concluded that EV-D68 infections significantly burdened hospitals in the United States due to the magnitude of the outbreak (4).
In addition to causing severe respiratory disease, the 2014 outbreak was also temporally associated with an increase in cases of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) both in the United States and Canada (5–7). Cases of acute flaccid paralysis are routinely monitored and reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) for the detection of wild poliovirus in circulation (8). Where AFP is defined by the WHO as the “sudden onset of paralysis/weakness in any part of the body of a child less than 15 years old” (9), acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a syndrome of AFP and is further defined by the CDC as occurring in patients younger than 21 years old, with one or more limbs demonstrating weakness or paralysis, and spinal cord lesions observed during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (10). Both AFP and AFM have been used to describe the neurological illness associated with EV-D68 infection (6, 11–18). For the purposes of this paper, AFM will be used to describe the paralysis induced by EV-D68 infection.
AFM was identified by the CDC in a total of 120 children infected with EV-D68 from 34 states between August and December of 2014 (11, 14). Since that time, cases of AFM have been associated with EV-D68 infection in France, Norway and the United Kingdom (16, 18–21). In addition, several children diagnosed with AFM had neurologic deficits 12 months after the original infection (7).
Here we describe two separate models of EV-D68 infection in mice that model human respiratory and neurological disease and respond to treatment with antiviral therapy. Both models utilize AG129 mice that are deficient in interferon (IFN)- α/β and –γ receptors (22, 23), making the mice more permissive to EV-D68 infection. While mice with intact IFN signaling have shown EV-D68-associated disease, this was only shown in mice less than two days old (24). In addition, two-day-old mice developed neurological disease, but not respiratory disease. The NIH funding for development of these models specified the use of AG129 mice, although we also evaluated infection of BALB/c, C57BL/6J, FVB/NJ, SJL/J, and Swiss-Webster mice. Only AG129 mice showed respiratory and neurological disease signs following infection with mouse-adapted EV-D68. In addition, AG129 mice have been used for development of other virus infection models, including Tacaribe arenavirus (25), Dengue virus (26), Zika virus (27), and have even been used in vaccine evaluations in Dengue virus models (28). It has been observed that the IFN response in human infections is attenuated by EV-D68 infection (29–31). Therefore, the use of interferon deficient mice was considered acceptable, although not ideal for model development.
The respiratory model developed in four-week-old mice includes an intranasal challenge with mouse-adapted EV-D68 (US/MO/14–18949). The subsequent infection is characterized by viremia, altered lung function (PenH) as demonstrated by plethysmography, high viral titers and pro-inflammatory cytokines in lung tissue, and histological changes including interstitial pneumonia (32). The neurological model in ten-day-old mice includes an intraperitoneal challenge with mouse-adapted EV-D68. The subsequent infection leads to a systemic viremia with viral titers observed in leg muscle, spinal cord, and brain followed by paralysis and mortality. These studies evaluated the anitiviral effects of guanidine, an inhibitor of the 2C protein function, in both respiratory and neurological disease models of EV-D68 infection.
Materials and Methods
Virus and Cells.
Enterovirus D68 (US/MO/14–18949) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). This virus was serially-passaged 30 times in the lungs of AG129 mice to increase its virulence (32). After passaging, the virus was plaque-purified three times and amplified in RD cells to obtain a working stock. Human rhabdomyosarcoma (CCL-136) cells (RD) from ATCC were cultured in 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and minimum essential media (MEM) (GE Healthcare Hyclone, Logan, UT USA). Media used for EV-D68 cell culture infection was 2% FBS and 25 mM MgCl2 in MEM + 50 μg/ml of gentamicin. Tissues harvested from mice were homogenized in MEM. MEM served as the vehicle for animal infections.
Animals
Male and female AG129 mice were obtained from a specific-pathogen-free breeding colony at Utah State University. For the respiratory model, four-week-old, male and female mice were used for all studies. For the neurological model, 10-day-old male and female AG129 mice were infected without being removed from the dam.
Antiviral Compounds.
Guanidine HCl was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Virus Titer.
Tissue virus titers were determined on RD cells in 96-well microplates. Plates were seeded with cells 24 hours prior to infection and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. Tissue samples were harvested and homogenized in 1 mL MEM and frozen until titration. Serial 10-fold dilutions of tissue samples were prepared and added to four replicate wells containing RD cells. Microplates were incubated for 6 days at 33°C with 5% CO2 (33). Plates were examined visually six days’ post-infection for viral cytopathic effects. The 50% cell culture infectious doses (CCID50) were calculated using an endpoint dilution method (34) and virus titers reported per mL.
Histopathology.
For each mouse, the entire left lung was removed and fixed in freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 days. Paraformaldehyde-fixed tissue sections were processed and embedded in paraffin according to routine histologic techniques. Sections, 5 μm thick, were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and examined by light microscopy by a board certified veterinary pathologist. Lesions were graded on the following scale of 0–4: 0 = no lesions, 1= minimal lesions, 2 = mild lesions, 3 = moderate lesions, and 4 = severe lesions.
Lung cytokine/chemokine determinations.
A sample (20 μl) from each lung homogenate was tested for cytokines and chemokines using an ELISA-based assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Quansys Biosciences Q-Plex™ Array, Logan, UT). The Quansys multiplex ELISA is a quantitative test in which 16 distinct capture antibodies have been applied to each well of a 96-well plate in a defined array. Each sample supernatant was tested at 2 dilutions for the following: IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17, MCP-1, IFN-γ, TNFα, MIP-1α, GM-CSF, and RANTES. Cytokine and chemokine titers of mice infected with EV-D68 are reported in pg/ml of homogenized lung tissue. Definition of abbreviations are: IL -interleukin; MCP - monocyte chemoattractant protein; IFN - interferon; TNF -tumor necrosis factor, MIP – macrophage inflammatory Protein; GM-CSF -granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor; and RANTES – regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted.
Evaluation of guanidine in vivo using EV-D68-infected four-week-old mice.
Three groups of four-week-old mice (n=12 per group) were infected intranasally with MEM containing EV-D68 (1.0 × 104.5 CCID50/mouse) in a 90 μl volume. Guanidine treatments started four hours post-infection and continued b.i.d. for 5 days via the intraperitoneal route. Doses of 100 or 200 mg/kg/day of guanidine were used while placebo-treated mice were treated on the same schedule. Physiological sterile saline was used to solubilize guanidine and to treat the placebo group. Four mice per group were euthanized on days one, three, and five post-infection for collection of lung tissue and whole blood. The left lung was used for histopathology and the right lung was used for virus titers and quantification of cytokines. Blood samples were evaluated for viremia.
Evaluation of Lung Function by Plethysmography.
The plethysmograph and mouse sized acquisition chambers (emka Technologies, Falls Church, VA) were used to evaluate lung function. The following parameters were measured and analyzed: enhanced pause (Penh), tidal volume (TV), minute (MV) and expiratory (EV) volumes, times of inspiration (Ti), expiration (Te), and relaxation (RT), peak inspiratory (PIF) and expiratory (PEF) flow, frequency of breath (Freq), 50% expiratory flow (EF50) and end inspiratory (EIP) and expiratory (EEP) pauses. To reduce variability, mean readings from infected mice were normalized to mean readings from mock-infected (cell culture medium) controls on each day. To obtain measurements, mice were placed in the chambers and allowed to acclimate for three minutes. Plethysmography readings were then recorded for the next five minutes in response to room air. To simulate a hypercapnia challenge, the chambers were flooded with a gas mixture containing 7% CO2, 50% O2 and balanced with N2. The plethysmography readings were recorded for an additional five minutes as CO2-challenged.
Evaluation of Lung function (Penh) in EV-D68-infected four-week-old mice following treatment with guanidine.
Four groups of eight mice were used to evaluate the impact of guanidine on Penh after EV-D68 infection. A mock-infected control group was used as a baseline for evaluation of plethysmography measurements. Infected mice were challenged by intranasal instillation using a 90 μl volume of MEM containing EVD68 (1.0 × 104.5 CCID50). Guanidine treatments started four hours post-infection and occurred b.i.d. × five days. A dose of 200 mg/kg/day of guanidine was evaluated in this study. Guanidine was solubilized in saline and administered via the intraperitoneal route in a 0.1 ml volume. Placebo-treated mice received saline on the same schedule. Plethysmography readings were obtained on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 post-infection.
Characterization of EV-D68 in 10-day-old mice.
Four groups of six mice each were infected intraperitoneally with EV-D68 using a 50 μl volume of MEM containing one of four dilutions of EV-D68 equating to challenge doses of 1.0 × 106.7, 1.0 × 106.2, 1.0 × 105.7, or 1.0 × 105.2CCID50 of EV-D68. A fifth group was mock-infected using cell culture medium and served as normal controls. Mice were monitored daily for weight-loss, neurological score and mortality.
Neurological scoring system for EV-D68 infection in mice.
To quantify paralysis induced by EV-D68 infection, we adapted a neurological scoring system used in a mouse model for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (35). However, mice were evaluated only for hind limb function and mobility. An impact on righting reflex was not observed in mice with paralysis.
In vivo evaluation of guanidine treatment in 10-day-old mice.
Groups of five mice were infected intraperitoneally with a 50 μl volume of MEM containing EV-D68 (1.0 × 106.7CCID50). Four hours post-infection, mice were treated i.p. with guanidine at doses of 12.5, 25, 50 or 100 mg/kg/day. Treatments occurred b.i.d. for five days. Saline was used to solubilize guanidine and as placebo treatment. Mice were monitored daily for weight-loss, neurological score and mortality. An additional five mice were included in the placebo-treated and the 100 mg/kg/day guanidine treated groups for euthanasia on day three post-infection for tissue virus titers and quantification of cytokines. Lungs, liver, kidney, spleen, leg muscle, spinal cord, and brain tissue were collected and evaluated for tissue virus titers.
Ethical Treatment of Animals.
This study was done under the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Utah State University. The work was completed in the AAALAC-accredited Laboratory Animal Research Center of Utah State University in accordance to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (36).
Statistical Analysis.
Statistical Analysis was completed using Prism 7.0d, GraphPad Software (La Jolla, CA). For comparison of virus titers and cytokine concentrations, a two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was completed with treatment and day-post-infection as factors. A Dunnett post-test was used to compare guanidine-treated groups to placebo controls. Cytokine differences were evaluated by ANOVA assuming equal variance and normal distribution. For Penh measurements obtained from plethysmography, a two-way ANOVA was completed with treatment and day-post-infection as factors. Both treated and placebo groups were compared to the mock-infected group as a baseline.
Results
Respiratory disease model in four-week-old mice.
Guanidine treatment at 200 mg/kg/day significantly reduced lung virus titers in mice infected intranasally with mouse-adapted EV-D68 (Figure 1A). Significant reductions from placebo-treated mice were observed in mean lung virus titers on day 1 and day 3 post-infection. Guanidine treatment provided a 200-fold reduction (7.3 ± 0.2 vs 5.0 ± 0.9 log10) on day 1 post-infection and a 1600-fold reduction (7.7 ± 0.4 vs 4.5 ± 1.0 log10) on day 3 post-infection compared to placebo-treated mice. Following treatment with 100 mg/kg/day of guanidine, a 20-fold reduction was observed on day 1 (7.3 ± 0.2 vs 6.0 ± 0.3 log10) and day 3 (7.7 ± 0.4 vs 6.4 ± 2.5 log10), however the differences were not statistically significant. The respiratory infection caused by EV-D68 is acute with rapid elevation of virus titers in the lung peaking on day 1 to 3. Following that peak in virus titer, the virus begins to be cleared from the lung with as much as a two log decrease in titer observed by day 5 post-infection, even in untreated mice. The rapid clearance of virus by day 5 is the reason significant differences between treated and non-treated mice are not observed on that date. Guanidine treatment appears to inhibit virus replication, but does not completely prevent replication. However, prevention of the high virus titers in the lung also prevents virus spread to the blood, limiting or preventing clinical signs of disease.
Blood virus tiers.
While virus titers were detected in the blood of placebo-treated mice on days 1 and 3 post-infection, both doses of guanidine decreased blood virus titers significantly (Figure 1B). This decrease was calculated as a 160-fold reduction (2.9 ± 1.5 vs <0.7 ± 0.0 log10) on day 1 and a 2000-fold reduction (4.0 ± 0.0 vs <0.7 ± 0.0 log10) on day 3 post-infection.
Cytokines from lung tissue.
Of the 16 cytokines and chemokines evaluated, guanidine treatment significantly reduced concentrations of IL-6 (Figure 1C) and MCP-1 (Figure 1D) consistently. Guanidine treatment at both doses significantly reduced concentrations of IL-6 on day 3 post-infection compared to placebo-treated mice. In addition, concentrations of MCP-1 were reduced on day 3 post-infection in both treatment groups and day 5 post-infection in mice treated with 200 mg/kg/day of guanidine. As part of characterizing this model for use in the evaluation of experiment therapeutics, we completed a number of repeat studies to identify variability in our results. A number of other proinflammatory cytokines were elevated in different studies, e.g. RANTES. However, variability observed in other cytokine values prevented us from using them as consistent clinical signs in our disease model. The spikes in IL-6 and MCP-1 were consistently observed in all placebo-treated animals in all studies.
Histopathology.
A moderate interstitial pneumonia characterized by perivascular and alveolar wall infiltration of neutrophils was observed in placebo-treated mice. Three of four placebo-treated mice were observed with mild lesions and the fourth mouse was observed with minimal lung lesions. No lesions were observed in the lungs of mice treated with either 100 or 200 mg/kg/day of guanidine. Treatment with both 100 and 200 mg/kg/day of guanidine reduced inflammation of the lung tissue in EV-D68-infected mice (Figure 2). Despite modest reductions in lung virus titers, guanidine treatment prevented damage to the lung tissue as quantified by the presence of histological lesions. Since lesions were not observed in the lungs of any guanidine-treated mice, we did not attempted to quantify the lung lesions beyond the scale indicated. However, if partial protection of lungs from histological lesions are observed in future evaluations of experimental drugs, we will develop a lesion scoring system in an attempt to make the lesion scores quantitative.
Enhanced pause (Penh).
Guanidine treatment reduced the effect of EV-D68 infection on Penh in mice (Figure 3). Uninfected mice served as a normal baseline for measurements of Penh throughout the study and both guanidine-treated and placebo-treated mice were compared to control mice. A significant increase in Penh (34%), indicative of morbidity, was observed in placebo-treated mice on day 5 post-infection. However, Guanidine-treated mice were not statistically different compared to the normal control mice.
Neurological disease model in 10-day-old mice.
Mice infected intraperitoneally with EV-D68 succumbed to infection based upon the virus dose used for inoculation (Figure 4A). The mouse-adapted virus caused mortality in 100% of the mice (6/6) using a dose of 1.0 × 106.7 CCID/mouse. A dose of 1.0 × 106.2 EV-D68 CCID50/mouse caused mortality in 66% of the mice (4/6) that were infected. Lower doses of 1.0 × 105.7 and 1.0 × 105.2 CCID50/mouse of EV-D68 led to mortality in 17% (1/6) of mice for both infectious doses of virus.
Infection with EV-D68 led to observable paralysis in mice that was quantified using an adapted neurological scoring system. The time of onset and severity of paralysis depended upon the infectious dose of virus used for challenge (Figure 4B). A significant increase in neurological scores was observed on days 3 and 4 post-infection in the group infected with 1.0 × 106.7 CCID50/mouse of EV-D68. Paralysis was observed in 100% of mice (6/6) infected with the highest challenge dose. The severity of paralysis increased until the mice succumbed to infection. Paralysis was also observed in 83% of mice (5/6) infected with 1.0 × 106.2 CCID50/mouse of EV-D68. While 4 of the 5 mice in which paralysis was observed succumbed to the infection, one mouse recovered from the paralysis and survived the infection. The neurological score was significantly higher than control mice on days 4 and 5 post-infection. In addition, paralysis was observed in 50% of mice (3/6) challenged with both of the lower doses of EV-D68. One mouse in each group succumbed to infection but the remaining mice recovered from paralysis and survived to the end of the study.
In vivo evaluation of guanidine treatment in 10-day-old AG 129 mice.
Treatment with guanidine protected 10-day-old AG129 mice from mortality (Figure 5A) and paralysis as indicated by neurological score (Figure 5B). Guanidine protected 100% of the mice (5/5) from mortality at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg/day. Doses of either 12.5 or 25 mg/kg/day did not offer protection against mortality. Both higher treatment doses (50 and 100 mg/kg/day) of guanidine protected mice from virus-induced paralysis throughout the study. No paralysis was observed in either treatment group and neurological scores were significantly different from placebo-treated mice on day 3, day 4, and day 5 post-infection. Lower doses of guanidine (12.5 and 25 mg/kg/day) did not provide protection from paralysis and neurological scores were similar to placebo-treated mice.
Guanidine treatment significantly reduced virus titers in every tissue evaluated (Figure 6). Guanidine treatment significantly reduced virus titers in the lungs (5.2 ± 0.5 vs 2.8 ± 1.5 log10) and virus titers were only detected in 2 of 5 samples from the spinal cord and were not detected in any of the brain tissue samples.
Discussion
The outbreak of EV-D68 in 2014 as well as the link to AFM have led to the classification of EV-D68 as a re-emerging disease (1). Up to this point, clinical intervention has relied mainly on supportive care and relieving patient symptoms. Therapeutic interventions are needed to reduce virus burden and improve disease outcome. A recent publication by Hixon, Clarke and Tyler evaluated the efficacy of human intravenous immunoglobulin (hIVIG), fluoxetine, and dexamethasone in a mouse model of paralytic myelitis (37). While hIVIG reduced paralysis and spinal cord viral load, fluoxetine had no effect on either parameter and dexamethasone worsened paralysis and viral burden of the spinal cord. While the work of Hixon, Clarke and Tyler is valuable for the data presented on the evaluation of clinically relevant antiviral compounds, they were unable to evaluate the effects of these compounds on respiratory disease (37). In addition, our model of neurological disease can be evaluated by observation of hind limb paralysis as it develops in the mice after infection. We also observed prevention of that paralysis following antiviral drug treatment. While both two-day-old mice and 10-day-old AG129 mice are immunologically deficient, the increased size of the 10-day-old mice makes administration of antiviral therapies more practical, and these studies in 4-week-old mice represent the first model for the evaluation of antiviral therapies against respiratory disease following EV-D68 infection.
Development of a virus infection model also requires the identification of an antiviral compound that can serve as a positive control. Without the use of a positive control, an experimental drug could fail to protect mice following infection due to over challenge with virus or some other anomaly in the study. However, if the positive control drug performs as expected, it is safer to conclude that the experimental drug did not provide efficacy at the dose and route tested. To identify a positive control for use in our EV-D68 disease models, we evaluated Enviroxime, Pirodivir, Pleconaril, Ribavirin, Rupintravir and guanidine. Each of these compounds showed high antiviral activity in vitro, but only guanidine protected mice from infection in the mouse models. Guanidine decreased lung and blood virus titers in EV-D68-infected mice in the respiratory model. After infection, virus titers peak at approximately 108 virus/ml in the lung on day 1 to 3, then decrease until virus is no longer detectable by day 9. Virus in the blood peaks at approximately 106 virus/ml on day 1 to 3, then decreases by day 5. The virus titer in the lung following guanidine treatment, never increased above 106 virus/ml and was not observed in the blood, indicating that guanidine treatment inhibited virus replication. Since guanidine acts on the 2C protein of EV-D68, it is likely that guanidine prevents replication of EV-D68 (38). We hypothesize that the virus initially replicates in the lung and then spreads to blood where the viremia leads to infection of other tissues, including the central nervous system. Guanidine treatment reduced virus replication in the lung, thereby limiting virus spread to the blood. These studies demonstrate that guanidine is an effective positive control drug for use in our EV-D68 infection models in AG129 mice.
Decreased concentrations of IL-6 and MCP-1 in the same lung tissue samples indicated a decrease in tissue inflammation following guanidine treatment. Decreases in IL-6 and MCP-1 and severity of the interstitial pneumonia support the conclusion that inflammation of the lung tissue is lessened by treatment with guanidine.
The CDC summaries report from the EV-D68 outbreaks between 2008 and 2010, and the 2014 U.S. outbreak indicated that EV-D68 may cause severe upper and lower respiratory tract disease (39, 40). However, the majority of patients had only mild disease with the predominant symptoms of cough and dyspnea (39, 40). We are not aware of any reports in the literature describing histological lesions following EV-D68 respiratory disease in humans. However, the lesions associated with interstitial pneumonia caused by EV-D68 in mice are similar to lesions observed in human respiratory infections caused by rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and rare cases of influenza vaccine-induced lung injury (41–44).
In this study, guanidine reduced the changes in Penh that were observed in placebo-treated mice. This result agrees with decreases in lung inflammation reflected in the cytokine concentrations and severity of the interstitial pneumonia. However, due to the controversy surrounding Penh, specifically the inappropriate use of Penh as an indicator of airway resistance (45–48) we simply consider Penh to be an indicator of morbidity in mice. As Penh was not the primary focus of this paper, we have not attempted to address the controversy surrounding its meaning in animal models. No mortality was observed in the respiratory model following infection, so we were unable to correlate Penh with mortality. However, we suspect that it does identify an effect of virus infection on lung function, although we are unable to make definitive conclusions around the true meaning of Penh. Ongoing studies are attempting to address that meaning in our model of EV-D68 infection.
Guanidine reduced signs of respiratory disease when treatment started 4 hrs post-infection. While it may seem impractical from a clinical standpoint, the +4 hr treatment window provides a reasonable expectation of efficacy in an animal model and is stringent enough to eliminate compounds that do not effectively reduce signs of disease after infection. In addition, investigators in the Institute for Antiviral Research at Utah State University have participated in the Collaborative Antiviral Testing Group of the NIH for more than 25 years. During that time, thousands of experimental therapeutics from Sponsors around the world have been evaluated by in vitro testing methods and in animal models. This treatment approach in animal models has been successful in the preclinical development of compounds that were later licensed for clinical use, including ribavirin (Virazole™), stavudine (Zerit™), oseltamivir (Tamiflu™), Peramivir (Rapivab), and T-705 (Favipiravir) (49–53). The data provided in the Supplemental Information shows results following evaluation of a number of antiviral compounds that had previously shown promise in vitro against EV-D68, although none of them were effective in our animal model, even when treatment was initiated at +4 hrs post-infection. Only guanidine was able to significantly reduce signs of disease in the EV-D68 mouse model. Due to its potential toxicity the development of guanidine as a therapeutic was not further evaluated, although it provides a reliable and robust positive control in both respiratory and neurological disease models for EV-D68 infection. Since guanidine is only used as a positive control, we did not evaluate the therapeutic window for guanidine treatment. In addition, we recognize that beginning treatment at 4 hours post-infection does not reflect the clinical situation, and thus may provide an over-optimistic estimate of guanidine’s antiviral effect in vivo. To determine the therapeutic window in our disease models, we recently completed an evaluation of human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) as treatment for an EV-D68 infection in mice (54). In the respiratory disease model, a single intraperitoneal treatment with IVIg at 24 and 48 hours post-infection had little impact on lung virus titers and histopathology in the lungs, but did reduce virus titers in the blood. However, in the neurological disease model, delayed treatment with IVIg until 24 or 48 hours p.i. protected 100% and 80% of the mice from mortality, respectively, and prevented paralysis from EV-D68 infection as indicated by decreased neurological scores (54).
Our model of EV-D68 neurological disease in 10-day-old AG129 mice demonstrates a rapid onset of paralysis and mortality following i.p. infection of EV-D68. We previously demonstrated that EV-D68 infection produced an acute flaccid paralysis, including myelitis, myositis, and muscle atrophy at the onset of paralysis in mice. Those data suggest that motor deficits are caused by loss of motor neurons in the spinal cord, but early muscle infection and disease may also contribute to the deficits (55). Guanidine improved survival and decreased paralysis as indicated by neurological scores in treated mice. In addition, treatment with 50 and 100 mg/kg/day of guanidine protected mice from mortality and paralysis. One limitation of our studies is the use of AG129 mice lacking interferon receptors. Since these animals were necessary to observe signs of disease, it is unknown whether compounds identified in our model would be active in mice with an intact interferon response. However, since the antiviral compound does not have the benefit of an interferon response to aid in virus clearance, we believe this creates a stringent model where the antiviral compound must be highly effective in order to limit viral replication and prevent signs of disease.
Guanidine is a well-known compound that has been used for the treatment of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, an autoimmune disorder affecting neuromuscular junctions (56). However, the drug has not been widely used due to toxicity concerns (57).
Guanidine is an inhibitor of the 2C protein of picornaviruses (58). While the exact function of the 2C protein is unclear, it is necessary for viral replication and interaction with guanidine inhibits RNA synthesis. Guanidine has previously been used in conjunction with 2-(α-hydroxybenzyl)-benzimidazole to treat paralysis in mice infected with Coxsackievirus A9 (59). However, these studies represent the first treatment of both respiratory and neurological disease with an antiviral compound in EV-D68-infected mice. While guanidine may treat enterovirus infections in mice, we expect concerns regarding toxicity to prevent clinical applications. Guanidine may serve as a scaffold for the synthesis of future compounds and establishes the 2C protein as a target for antiviral therapy of EVD68 infections. In addition, guanidine can be used as the positive control for models of EV-D68 infection.
We developed two models for EV-D68 infection in AG129 mice that respond to treatment with guanidine. For an EV-D68 respiratory infection, four-week-old AG129 mice were infected intranasally with a mouse-adapted strain of EV-D68. Guanidine decreased: lung virus titers, lung cytokine concentrations, and inflammation in the lung. In addition, whole body plethysmography was used to show that guanidine prevented increases in Penh observed in EV-D68-infected mice. This work represents the first respiratory model of EV-D68 infection that responds to antiviral therapy. In the neurological model, guanidine treatment prevented EV-D68-induced paralysis and mortality establishing guanidine as a functional control for EV-D68 infection in mice. While toxicity may prevent clinical use, guanidine may represent a starting point for drug development. The 2C protein of EV-D68 appears to be a reasonable target for antiviral therapies.
In addition, we evaluated Enviroxime, Pirodivir, Pleconaril, Ribavirin, and Rupintravir in the respiratory and neurological disease models as potential antivral therapies. However, none of these antiviral compounds showed therapeutic efficacy in our in vivo models (Table S1, Supplementary Information). However, we feel that this information is important as many of these compounds have been suggested as potential therapies for EV-D68 infections.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was done at the Institute for Antiviral Research at Utah State University. Funding was provided by the National Institute of Health contract number HHSN2722010000391, Task Order A79, from the Virology Branch, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, USA.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Imamura T, Oshitani H. 2015. Global reemergence of enterovirus D68 as an important pathogen for acute respiratory infections. Rev Med Virol 25:102–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Control CfD. July 19, 2016 2017. Enterovirus D68. https://www.cdc.gov/non-polio-enterovirus/about/ev-d68.html. Accessed 5/22/2017.
- 3.Messacar K, Abzug MJ, Dominguez SR. 2016. 2014 outbreak of enterovirus D68 in North America. J Med Virol 88:739–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Messacar K, Hawkins SM, Baker J, Pearce K, Tong S, Dominguez SR, Parker S. 2016. Resource Burden During the 2014 Enterovirus D68 Respiratory Disease Outbreak at Children’s Hospital Colorado: An Unexpected Strain. JAMA Pediatr 170:294–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maloney JA, Mirsky DM, Messacar K, Dominguez SR, Schreiner T, Stence NV. 2015. MRI findings in children with acute flaccid paralysis and cranial nerve dysfunction occurring during the 2014 enterovirus D68 outbreak. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:245–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Messacar K, Schreiner TL, Maloney JA, Wallace A, Ludke J, Oberste MS, Nix WA, Robinson CC, Glode MP, Abzug MJ, Dominguez SR. 2015. A cluster of acute flaccid paralysis and cranial nerve dysfunction temporally associated with an outbreak of enterovirus D68 in children in Colorado, USA. Lancet 385:1662–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yea C, Bitnun A, Robinson J, Mineyko A, Barton M, Mah JK, Vajsar J, Richardson S, Licht C, Brophy J, Crone M, Desai S, Hukin J, Jones K, Muir K, Pernica JM, Pless R, Pohl D, Rafay MF, Selby K, Venkateswaran S, Bernard G, Yeh EA. 2017. Longitudinal Outcomes in the 2014 Acute Flaccid Paralysis Cluster in Canada. J Child Neurol 32:301–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tangermann RH, Lamoureux C, Tallis G, Goel A. 2017. The critical role of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Int Health 9:156–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.World Health Organization. Department of Vaccines and Other Biologicals. 2003. WHO-recommended standards for surveillance of selected vaccine-preventable diseases. Dept. of Vaccines and Biologicals, Health Technology and Pharmaceuticals, World Health Organization, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nelson GR, Bonkowsky JL, Doll E, Green M, Hedlund GL, Moore KR, Bale JF Jr. 2016. Recognition and Management of Acute Flaccid Myelitis in Children. Pediatr Neurol 55:17–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aliabadi N, Messacar K, Pastula DM, Robinson CC, Leshem E, Sejvar JJ, Nix WA, Oberste MS, Feikin DR, Dominguez SR. 2016. Enterovirus D68 Infection in Children with Acute Flaccid Myelitis, Colorado, USA, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis 22:1387–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Esposito S, Bosis S, Niesters H, Principi N. 2015. Enterovirus D68 Infection. Viruses 7:6043–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Esposito S, Chidini G, Cinnante C, Napolitano L, Giannini A, Terranova L, Niesters H, Principi N, Calderini E. 2017. Acute flaccid myelitis associated with enterovirus-D68 infection in an otherwise healthy child. Virol J 14:4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Greninger AL, Naccache SN, Messacar K, Clayton A, Yu G, Somasekar S, Federman S, Stryke D, Anderson C, Yagi S, Messenger S, Wadford D, Xia D, Watt JP, Van Haren K, Dominguez SR, Glaser C, Aldrovandi G, Chiu CY. 2015. A novel outbreak enterovirus D68 strain associated with acute flaccid myelitis cases in the USA (2012–14): a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 15:671–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hovden IA, Pfeiffer HC. 2015. Electrodiagnostic findings in acute flaccid myelitis related to enterovirus D68. Muscle Nerve 52:909–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lang M, Mirand A, Savy N, Henquell C, Maridet S, Perignon R, Labbe A, Peigue-Lafeuille H. 2014. Acute flaccid paralysis following enterovirus D68 associated pneumonia, France, 2014. Euro Surveill 19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mirand A, Peigue-Lafeuille H. 2015. Acute flaccid myelitis and enteroviruses: an ongoing story. Lancet 385:1601–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pfeiffer HC, Bragstad K, Skram MK, Dahl H, Knudsen PK, Chawla MS, Holberg-Petersen M, Vainio K, Dudman SG, Kran AM, Rojahn AE. 2015. Two cases of acute severe flaccid myelitis associated with enterovirus D68 infection in children, Norway, autumn 2014. Euro Surveill 20:21062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Crone M, Tellier R, Wei XC, Kuhn S, Vanderkooi OG, Kim J, Mah JK, Mineyko A. 2016. Polio-Like Illness Associated With Outbreak of Upper Respiratory Tract Infection in Children. J Child Neurol 31:409–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Varghese R, Iyer A, Hunter K, Cargill JS, Cooke RP. 2015. Sampling the upper respiratory tract for enteroviral infection is important in the investigation of an acute neurological illness in children. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 19:494–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Williams CJ, Thomas RH, Pickersgill TP, Lyons M, Lowe G, Stiff RE, Moore C, Jones R, Howe R, Brunt H, Ashman A, Mason BW. 2016. Cluster of atypical adult Guillain-Barre syndrome temporally associated with neurological illness due to EV-D68 in children, South Wales, United Kingdom, October 2015 to January 2016. Euro Surveill 21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Muller U, Steinhoff U, Reis LF, Hemmi S, Pavlovic J, Zinkernagel RM, Aguet M. 1994. Functional role of type I and type II interferons in antiviral defense. Science 264:1918–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.van den Broek MF, Muller U, Huang S, Aguet M, Zinkernagel RM. 1995. Antiviral defense in mice lacking both alpha/beta and gamma interferon receptors. J Virol 69:4792–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hixon AM, Yu G, Leser JS, Yagi S, Clarke P, Chiu CY, Tyler KL. 2017. A mouse model of paralytic myelitis caused by enterovirus D68. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gowen BB, Wong MH, Larson D, Ye W, Jung KH, Sefing EJ, Skirpstunas R, Smee DF, Morrey JD, Schneller SW. 2–10. Development of a new tacaribe arenavirus infection model and its use to explore antiviral activity of a novel aristeromycin analog.. PLoS One. 5(9). pii: e12760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Julander JG, Perry ST, Shresta S. 2011. Important advances in the field of anti-dengue virus research. Antivir Chem Chemother. 21(3):105–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Julander JG, Siddharthan VJ. 2017. Small-Animal Models of Zika Virus. Infect Dis. 216(suppl_10):S919–S927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sarathy VV, Milligan GN, Bourne N, Barrett AD. 2015. Mouse models of dengue virus infection for vaccine testing. Vaccine. 33(50):7051–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xiang Z, Li L, Lei X, Zhou H, Zhou Z, He B, Wang J. 2014. Enterovirus 68 3C protease cleaves TRIF to attenuate antiviral responses mediated by Toll-like receptor 3. J Virol 88:6650–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xiang Z, Liu L, Lei X, Zhou Z, He B, Wang J. 2015. 3C Protease of Enterovirus D68 Inhibits Cellular Defense Mediated by Interferon Regulatory Factor 7. J Virol 90:1613–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rui Y, Su J, Wang H, Chang J, Wang S, Zheng W, Cai Y, Wei W, Gordy JT, Markham R, Kong W, Zhang W, Yu XF. 2017. Disruption of MDA5-Mediated Innate Immune Responses by the 3C Proteins of Coxsackievirus A16, Coxsackievirus A6, and Enterovirus D68. J Virol 91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Evans WJ, Hurst BL, Peterson CJ, Van Wettere A, Day CW, Smee DF, and Tarbet EB Development of a Respiratory Disease Model for Enterovirus D68 in 4-Week-Old Mice for Evaluation of Antiviral Therapies. (manuscript submitted). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Smee DF, Evans WJ, Nicolaou KC, Tarbet EB, Day CW. 2016. Susceptibilities of enterovirus D68, enterovirus 71, and rhinovirus 87 strains to various antiviral compounds. Antiviral Res 131:61–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Reed LM H 1938. A Simple Method of Estimating Fifty Percent Endpoints. The American Journal of Hygiene 27:493–497. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hatzipetros T, Kidd JD, Moreno AJ, Thompson K, Gill A, Vieira FG. 2015. A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS. J Vis Exp doi: 10.3791/53257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.National Research Council (U.S.) Committe for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals IfLARUS, National Academies Press (U.S.) 2011. Guide for the care and use of Laboratory Animals National Academies Press, [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hixon AM, Clarke P, Tyler KL. 2017. Evaluating Treatment Efficacy in a Mouse Model of Enterovirus D68-Associated Paralytic Myelitis. J Infect Dis 216:1245–1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Caliguiri LA, Tamm I. 1968. Action of guanidine on the replication of poliovirus RNA. Virology 35:408–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2011. Clusters of acute respiratory illness associated with human enterovirus 68—Asia, Europe, and United States, 2008–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep;60:1301–1304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Midgley CM, Jackson MA, Selvarangan R, Turabelidze G, Obringer E, Johnson D, Giles BL, Patel A, Echols F, Oberste MS, Nix WA, Watson JT, Gerber SI. 2014. Severe respiratory illness associated with enterovirus D68— Missouri and Illinois, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 63:798–799. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jacobs SE, Soave R, Shore TB, Satlin MJ, Schuetz AN, Magro C, Jenkins SG, Walsh TJ. 2013. Human rhinovirus infections of the lower respiratory tract in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 15:474–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Imakita M, Shiraki K, Yutani C, Ishibashi-Ueda H. 2000. Pneumonia caused by rhinovirus. Clin Infect Dis 30:611–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Banna GL, Aversa SM, Cattelan AM, Crivellari G, Monfardini S. 2004. Respiratory syncytial virus-related pneumonia after stem cell transplantation successfully treated with palivizumab and steroid therapy. Scand J Infect Dis 36:155–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hibino M, Kondo T. 2017. Interstitial Pneumonia Associated with the Influenza Vaccine: A Report of Two Cases. Intern Med 56:197–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lomask M 2006. Further exploration of the Penh parameter. Exp Toxicol Pathol 57 Suppl 2:13–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Menachery VD, Gralinski LE, Baric RS, Ferris MT. 2015. New Metrics for Evaluating Viral Respiratory Pathogenesis. PLoS One 10:e0131451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lundblad LK, Irvin CG, Hantos Z, Sly P, Mitzner W, Bates JH. 2007. Penh is not a measure of airway resistance! Eur Respir J 30:805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bates J, Irvin C, Brusasco V, Drazen J, Fredberg J, Loring S, Eidelman D, Ludwig M, Macklem P, Martin J, Milic-Emili J, Hantos Z, Hyatt R, Lai-Fook S, Leff A, Solway J, Lutchen K, Suki B, Mitzner W, Pare P, Pride N, Sly P. 2004. The use and misuse of Penh in animal models of lung disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 31:373–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sidwell RW, Huffman JH, Khare GP, Allen LB, Witkowski JT, Robins RK. 1972. Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of Virazole: 1-beta-D-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide. Science 177:705–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sidwell RW, Hitchcock M, Okleberry KM, Burger RA, Warren RP, Morrey JD. 1992. Suppression of murine retroviral disease by 2’,3’-didehydro-2’,3’-dideoxythymidine (D4T). Antiviral Res 19:313–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sidwell RW, Huffman JH, Barnard DL, Bailey KW, Wong MH, Morrison A, Syndergaard T, Kim CU. 1998. Inhibition of influenza virus infections in mice by GS4104, an orally effective influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitor. Antiviral Res 37:107–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Smee DF, Huffman JH, Morrison AC, Barnard DL, Sidwell RW. 2001. Cyclopentane neuraminidase inhibitors with potent in vitro anti-influenza virus activities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:743–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sidwell RW, Barnard DL, Day CW, Smee DF, Bailey KW, Wong MH, Morrey JD, Furuta Y. 2007. Efficacy of orally administered T-705 on lethal avian influenza A (H5N1) virus infections in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:845–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Peterson CJ, Hurst BL, Evans WJ, Smee DF, and Tarbet EB Evaluation of human intravenous immunoglobulin in disease models of EV-D68 and EV-71 infections in mice. (manuscript submitted).
- 55.Morrey JD, Wang H, Hurst BL, Zukor K, Siddharthan V, Van Wettere AJ, Sinex DG, Tarbet EB. 2018. Causation of Acute Flaccid Paralysis by Myelitis and Myositis in Enterovirus-D68 Infected Mice Deficient in Interferon alphabeta/gamma Receptors. Viruses 10(1). pii: E33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lambert EH. 1966. Defects of neuromuscular transmission in syndromes other than myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 135:367–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lindquist S, Stangel M. 2011. Update on treatment options for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: focus on use of amifampridine. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 7:341–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sadeghipour S, Bek EJ, McMinn PC. 2012. Selection and characterisation of guanidine-resistant mutants of human enterovirus 71. Virus Res 169:72–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Eggers HJ. 1976. Successful treatment of enterovirus-infected mice by 2-(alpha-hydroxybenzyl)-benzimidazole and guanidine. J Exp Med 143:1367–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.