Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2018 Dec 10;97(49):e12592. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012592

Primary small cell carcinoma after renal transplant

A case report

Xueli Wang 1, Fenghua Wang 1, Yumei Liang 1, Wen Chen 1,
Editor: NA1
PMCID: PMC6310489  PMID: 30544366

Abstract

Introduction:

Primary small cell carcinoma (SCC) after renal transplantation is very rare. Here, we reported 1 case of primary SCC after renal transplantation and analyzed its clinical and pathological characteristics.

Case presentation:

A 55-year-old female underwent renal transplantation in our hospital 2 years ago and had been using tacrolimus for immunosuppressive therapy. Because of abdominal distention, the patient was admitted to our hospital. Computed tomography (CT) showed a malignant tumor of left kidney. Patient underwent surgical treatment and radical nephrectomy and lymph node dissection were selected. Postoperative pathological diagnosis was primary renal parenchyma and ureteral SCC. The patient has been treated with combination chemotherapy of lowpol (100 mg per day) and etoposide (10 mg per day). His vital signs are stable now, and he is receiving further treatment in our hospital.

Conclusion:

Because of immunosuppressive drugs use, the incidence of malignancies has increased significantly after renal transplantation. This case highlights the difficulty of diagnosis of primary SCC and the necessity of checking for neuroendocrine tumor after organ transplantation.

Keywords: immunosuppressive therapy, renal transplant, small cell carcinoma

1. Introduction

Small cell carcinoma (SCC) occurs mainly in the lungs. Extrapulmonary SCC accounts for 2.5% to 5.0% of all SCC and their main sites are bladder, prostate, gastrointestinal tract and cervix.[1] Primary renal SCC is rare, primary SCC after renal transplantation is more rare.[2,3] Here, we reported 1 case of primary SCC after renal transplantation and analyzed its clinical and pathological characteristics.

2. Case report

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of 309th hospital of PLA and was performed according to the principles of Declaration of Helsinki. The patient has provided informed consent for publication of this case, and the ethics committee approved the consent procedure. A 55-year-old female underwent renal transplantation in our hospital 2 years ago and had been using tacrolimus for immunosuppressive therapy. Because of abdominal distention and abdominal mass, the patient was admitted to our hospital recently, and computed tomography (CT) showed a malignant tumor of left kidney. The CT showed that left kidney had irregular mass with a diameter of about 9.3 cm, showing low density necrotic foci and a few punctate calcifications (Fig. 1). Radiologists considered the possibility of renal pelvis carcinoma or urothelial carcinoma.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Computed tomography (CT) showed a malignant tumor of left kidney. CT = computed tomography.

Patient underwent surgical treatment, and radical nephrectomy and lymph node dissection are selected. After surgery, patient has been treated with combination chemotherapy of lowpol (100 mg per day) and etoposide (10 mg per day). Hemodialysis is used to replace kidney function. This patient has been followed up for 8 months after surgery. His vital signs are stable now, and he is receiving further treatment in our hospital.

Left kidney and part of ureter tissues were examined, and the size of kidney was 14 × 9 × 7 cm. A gray white mass can be detected near the renal pelvis, and its size was 10 × 7 × 6 cm. The cutting surface is gray and medium. Another gray white mass appeared in the ureter cavity, 6 × 3.5 × 2.5 cm in size. Some lymph nodes were found in the hilum, and the diameter was 0.3 to 1.4 cm.

Tumor consisted of short spindle and small blue round cells. The tumor cells were nested and trabecular arranged, with large foci of necrosis and hemorrhage. Nucleus was deeply dyed, and nuclear division was more common. Tumor tissues grew diffusely and were extensively infiltrated the surrounding renal medulla, cortex, renal pelvis and adipose tissue around the renal hilum. Tumor suppository was formed in pulse tube. Metastatic small cell carcinoma nests can be observed in hilar lymph nodes (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

HE staining. (A) Renal SCC (100×); (B) Renal SCC (400×); (C) Ureter SCC (100×); (D) Ureter SCC (400×). SCC = small cell carcinoma.

Immunohistochemical results were as follows. Positive expression: CK (+), CK18 (+), CK5/6 (a few +), CD56 (++), NSE (++), SCLC (++), Syn (a few +), LCA (a few +), CD34 (blood vessel +), P40 (a few +), p63 (a few +); Negative expression: CD138 (−), CD38 (−), CK20 (−), CK7 (−), CgA (−), S-100 (−), Vimentin (−), CD10 (−), Pax-8 (−); Proliferation index: Ki-67 (+ > 75%) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Immunohistochemical staining. CK (+), CK18 (+), CK20 (−), LCA (a few +), NSE (++), SCLC (++), CD56 (++), Syn (a few +), Ki-67 (+ > 75%).

To sum up, the patient's pathological diagnosis was primary renal and ureteral SCC with obvious hemorrhage and necrosis. Tumor thrombus was found in the vessel. Tumor cell infiltrated ureter into the serosa, invaded focal pelvis, renal sinus fat, renal capsule and perirenal fat capsule. Tumor metastasis (3/7) can be observed in renal hilar lymph nodes.

3. Discussion

Because of immunosuppressive drugs use, the incidence of malignancies has increased significantly after renal transplantation.[4] It is generally believed that there are 3 main sources of tumor after renal transplantation: primary tumor after renal transplantation; tumor recurrence before renal transplantation; tumor derived from donor kidney. Urinary tract tumor especially urothelial carcinoma, is the main type of tumor after renal transplantation.[5]

The proportion of neuroendocrine carcinoma in renal epithelial malignancies is less than 1%. Renal small cell carcinoma (SCC) is a special neuroendocrine carcinoma, which is relatively rare. Since the 1st report of renal SCC in 1984, dozens of cases have been reported in papers. However, primary SCC in transplanted kidney is rarely reported.[6,7] The clinical symptoms of renal SCC are mainly abdominal mass, abdominal pain and gross hematuria. The peak age is mostly middle-ages and elderly, and women are more common than men.

Extrapulmonary SCC can occur in many organs, including ovary, cervix and pancreas. In urogenital organs, the most common primary site is bladder, followed by prostate, kidney, and ureter.[8] The common clinical symptoms were painless gross hematuria, followed by waist and abdominal pain.[1]

Renal SCC can occur in renal cortex, medulla and renal pelvis. Because their symptoms are not obvious, the tumor is very large and often metastases to lymph nodes when patients come to the hospital. The tumor is composed of poorly differentiated small blue round cells or short spindle cells. Tumor cells are arranged in small nests or trabeculae, often accompanied by necrosis and hemorrhage. The nuclei of tumor cells are rich in chromatin, nucleolus is not obvious, cytoplasm is sparse, mitotic figures are abundant, and mitotic index is high. There are many tumor thrombus formation in the vessels, and some patients with renal SCC may also have urothelial carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining shows that tumor cells have strong positive expression on neuroendocrine markers, and most of them express epithelial markers. In this case, renal SCC had all above characteristics. Immunohistochemical staining showed that tumor cells expressed multiple epithelial and neuroendocrine markers simultaneously.

The origin of renal SCC is still unclear. Some studies suggested that the SCC of urogenital system may originate from the pluripotent stem cells of urogenital tract. Renal SCC can also be accompanied by urothelial carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, which may support the hypothesis that the tumor originates from ureteral pluripotent stem cells.[9,10] Some researchers believed that tumors originate from the normal neuroendocrine cells in genitourinary tract. This view is supported by the expression of neuroendocrine markers in renal SCC.[11,12] Further studies are needed to elaborate its pathogenesis and origin.

Renal SCC is easily misdiagnosed as other small cell tumors, such as undifferentiated carcinoma, Ewing tumor, embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, lymphoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy are helpful for differential diagnosis. Renal SCC usually has more than 2 neuroendocrine markers (NSE, CD56, Syn, CgA, CD99, etc.) positive expression.[1315] We should pay attention to the possibility of external metastasis if we diagnose primary renal small cell carcinoma. Poorly differentiated urothelial carcinoma mainly expresses epithelial markers and does not express neuroendocrine markers.[16] Primary lymphoma of the ureter is rare, mainly expressing B lymphocyte markers, such as CD20, CD79a and so on. Metastatic renal SCC is also rare, and preoperative imaging examination helps to exclude the diagnosis.

Surgical resection is the 1st choice of renal SCC.[17,18] Their prognosis is very poor, with an average survival time of 10.5 months. In this case, the tumor volume is very large, and radical nephrectomy and lymph node dissection are selected.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Fenghua Wang.

Data curation: Xueli Wang, Wen Chen.

Investigation: Xueli Wang, Fenghua Wang, Yumei Liang.

Methodology: Yumei Liang.

Writing – original draft: Wen Chen.

Writing – review & editing: Wen Chen.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CT = computed tomography, SCC = small cell carcinoma.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • [1].Lee SS, Lee JL, Ryu MH, et al. Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma: single center experience with 61 patients. Acta Oncol 2007;46:846–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Deng S, Zhang B, Huang Y, et al. Case report of primary renal pelvis squamous cell carcinoma coexisting with long-standing calculi in left kidney on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e6341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].La Rosa S, Bernasconi B, Micello D, et al. Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the kidney: morphological, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and cytogenetic study of a case and review of the literature. Endocr Pathol 2009;20:24–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Cognard N, Anglicheau D, Gatault P, et al. Recurrence of renal cell cancer after renal transplantation in a multicenter French cohort. Transplantation 2018;102:860–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Dharnidharka VR, Naik AS, Axelrod D, et al. Clinical and economic consequences of early cancer after kidney transplantation in contemporary practice. Transplantation 2017;101:858–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Halleck F, Budde K. Transplantation: sirolimus for secondary SCC prevention in renal transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol 2012;8:687–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Lane BR, Chery F, Jour G, et al. Renal neuroendocrine tumours: a clinicopathological study. BJU Int 2007;100:1030–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Bandyopadhyay R, Biswas S, Nag D, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis presenting as hydronephrosis. J Cancer Res Ther 2010;6:537–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Kaplan M, Atakan IH, Bilgi S, et al. Case report: subcutaneous metastasis from small cell carcinoma of the prostate. Int Urol Nephrol 2007;39:157–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Borges GT, Vencio EF, Quek SI, et al. Conversion of prostate adenocarcinoma to small cell carcinoma-like by reprogramming. J Cell Physiol 2016;231:2040–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Janetschek G, Daffner P, Peschel R, et al. Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery for small renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1998;159:1152–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Prins FM, Kerkmeijer LGW, Pronk AA, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: alternative nephron-sparing treatment options for small renal masses, a systematic review. J Endourol 2017;31:963–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Addis BJ, Hamid Q, Ibrahim NB, et al. Immunohistochemical markers of small cell carcinoma and related neuroendocrine tumours of the lung. J Pathol 1987;153:137–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].de Souza Braga M, da Silva Paiva KB, Foguer K, et al. Involvement of the NF-small ka, CyrillicB/p50/Bcl-3 complex in response to antiangiogenic therapy in a mouse model of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Biomed Pharmacother 2014;68:873–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].McGahan JP, Sidhar K, Fananapazir G, et al. Renal cell carcinoma attenuation values on unenhanced CT: importance of multiple, small region-of-interest measurements. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017;42:2325–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Sun M, Shariat SF, Cheng C, et al. Prognostic factors and predictive models in renal cell carcinoma: a contemporary review. Eur Urol 2011;60:644–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Wang XZ, Yu ZX, Guo RJ, et al. Application of laparospic ultrasonography in surgery of small renal cell carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:9113–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Sugimoto K, Shimizu N, Nose K, et al. Clinical outcome of small renal cell carcinoma after delayed surgery versus immediate surgery. J Cancer 2013;4:514–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES