Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2018 Feb 10;379:189–201. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.02.006

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Evoked responses to optogenetic activation of nNOS-positive cells vary as a function of state. A 10-msec optogenetic stimulus was applied from time 0 to time 10 msec. Gray curves indicate the grand mean±SEM of averaged evoked responses to pulses (n=9 mice); black lines indicate the grand mean±SEM of randomly selected snippets of LFP trace data from the same recordings. Data are from wake (A), active wake (B), quiet wake (C) SWS, (D) and REMS (E). In all states, there was a significant interaction of time and conditon (evoked vs random) in affecting EEG potential (P < 0.001).