Skip to main content
Addiction & Health logoLink to Addiction & Health
. 2018 Jan;10(1):52–63. doi: 10.22122/ahj.v10i1.537

Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Effect of Gutkha: A Fast-growing Smokeless Tobacco

Bharat Sankhla 1, Khushboo Kachhwaha 2,, Sayed Yawer Hussain 3, Shikha Saxena 1, Sundaragiri Krishna Sireesha 1, Akshay Bhargava 1
PMCID: PMC6312563  PMID: 30627385

Abstract

Oral cancer is a highly lethal disease and one of the most debilitating and disfiguring of all malignancies in the world. According to Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) 2010 report, 60% of tobacco users in India use only smokeless tobacco. Among 206 million smokeless tobacco users, 65.1 million are consuming gutkha. In recent years, gutkha is recognized as a life threatening disorder with the serious health consequences. The aim of this review is to increase the attention to complete ban of tobacco use, awareness, knowledge, and beliefs of public about the harms of not only gutkha but also all other tobacco products and also to promote the intentions to quit the habits.

Keywords: Tobacco, Gutkha, Oral cancer, Carcinogens

Introduction

Tobacco use is a main cause of oral cancer and a preventable cause of premature death in India.1,2 According to Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) 2010 report, the majority of 60% Indian tobacco users use only smokeless tobacco.3 In recent years, a combination of areca nut and tobacco has been introduced in India known as gutkha (chewable tobacco form). Gutkha is consumed in most parts of India as a mouth freshener.4-8

Epidemiology

In India, there are 275 million tobacco users, constituting 35% of adults (as per GATS survey). This figure is made up of 164 million smokeless tobacco users, 69 million smokers, and 42 million people using both smoking and smokeless forms of tobacco.9,10

In India, 53.9 million men and 11.1 million women, 48.6 million of rural population and 16.5 million of urban population consume gutkha.11

The dependency on tobacco and damage of health due to gutkha consumption is recognized as a life threatening disorder with the health consequences.12 The increased use of gutkha has led to the highest incidence of oral cancer in India.13 If the present consumption rate of tobacco continues, it has been estimated that by mid 21th century there could be one billion premature deaths globally.14 Tobacco is directly linked to general health and economy of the entire world. This review is more concerned about tobacco consumption and its direct and indirect effects on society.

What is gutkha?

In 1975, the areca nut industries, using traditional Indian technology, along with the tobacco industry developed a dry preparation.15 This product without tobacco is known as ‘Pan masala’, while the product with tobacco is known as ‘Gutkha’.16

Commercially manufactured gutkha consists of sun-dried, roasted, finely chopped tobacco, areca nut, slaked lime, and catechu. This blend is mixed together with several other ingredients such as flavorings and sweeteners.17,18 It is either held in the mouth, sucked, or chewed. Saliva is generally spat out, but sometimes swallowed. Now, gutkha use has spread gradually to all parts of the world like South Asia, Europe, Canada, United Kingdom, and United States of America largely by South-east Asian expatriates.11,19-22

Why has gutkha consumption increased?

Gutkha has made inroads in traditional society and people with lower socioeconomic status as an alternative source of smoking.23 The myth in favor of gutkha that it is less harmful than smoking products is a major challenge in India.14 Gutkha consumption has increased because of aggressive advertisement, and convenient packed sachets, which is available in various brand names in almost all shops at affordable cost.24 The widespread marketing of gutkha with strategic placement of kiosks near schools has led to a widespread addiction amongst school-going children as well.25 Gutkha use can begin from early age of childhood due to its flavored sweet taste, easy availability, cost effectiveness, and instant stimulus. Gutkha's ease of procurement and storage, and also lack of social stigma may promote the switch from paan or smoking to gutkha.26 Many people use gutkha to obtain the psychoactive effects of nicotine. Some authors reported that all users thought that tobacco use may enhance the sense of wellbeing, reduce anxiety and appetite (in taxi drivers), produce arousal or relaxation, relieve tension, help concentration (in clerks, cashiers), combat bad breath, and also may be considered as a leisure activity.27,28 Some researchers found that habit of gutkha chewing is very difficult to quit.29

What does gutkha contain?

Nearly 4200 chemical constituents have been identified in gutkha.30 The main carcinogens in gutkha are derived from its ingredients including tobacco, areca nut,31 lime, and catechu. Gutkha (pan masala with tobacco) has been proved to be a carcinogenic agent32 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Ingredients of gutkha

Ingredients Constituents Origin/preparation Carcinogens/products
Areca nut Polyphenols: Flavonoids, Tannins Unripe/ripe, whole/sliced raw/roasted/sundried boiled/soaked in water fermented (under mud) Arecoline, MNPN
Alkaloids: Arecoline, Arecaidine, Guvacine, Guvacoline
Carbohydrate, Fat, Proteins, Crude fibers, Minerals
Tobacco Aliphatic/aromatic hydrocarbons, Alkaloids- Nicotine, Nornicotine, Cotinine, Anatabine, Anabasine Sundried, fermented boiled with molasses perfumed concentrated extract (Kiwam) NNN, NNK, NAT, NAB,* Benzo (a) Pyrene (BaP), toxic metals
Catechu Catechu- Tannic acid, Acacatechin, Quercetin, and Catechu red Extracted form heartwood of Acacia Catechu or Suma leaves of Uncaria Gambler, bark of Lithocarpus Polystachya (nang ko) ROS when used with lime
Slaked lime Calcium carbonate From coral, shell fish, quarried lime stone ROS when used with lime
Spices Clove, cardamom, aniseed Plants -
Sweeteners Sugar, saccharine Sugar cane -
Essences Menthol, mint, saffron, sandalwood, and musk ketones. Plants, trees -
*

Tobacco specific N-Nitrosamines

MNPN: 3-(methylnitrosamino) propionitrile; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; NNN: N'-nitrosonornicotine; NAB: N'-nitrosoanabasine; NAT: N'-nitrosoanatabine; NNK: 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone

1. Tobacco

Tobacco specific nitrosamines (TSNAs): Carcinogenic TSNAs in various tobacco products are responsible for numerous cancers. Gutkha products have four TSNAs, namely (i) N'-nitrosonornicotine (NNN), (ii) N'-nitrosoanatabine (NAT), (iii) N'-nitrosoanabasine, and (iv) 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK).33

The presence of nicotine is the main reason of addiction and resultant maintenance of chronic gutkha consumption habit.34

Metabolically activated TSNAs induce mutations in susceptible genes by forming DNA adducts, leading to tumor initiation. Tumor growth is promoted by binding of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and TSNAs leading to deregulated cell proliferation which increases the survival and metastasis.35

2. Areca nut

Areca nut-specific nitrosamines (ASNAs): Areca nut is the most abundant ingredient of gutkha, composed of tannins, alkaloids, free fatty acids, polysaccharides, fibers, and minerals like copper. Among the chemical constituents of areca nut, alkaloids are the most important biological carcinogens. The nut contains alkaloids like arecoline, arecaidine, guvacine, and guvacoline.36

(A) Alkaloids: Alkaloids are chemically reduced pyridines. Areca nut contains primarily two biologically relevant alkaloids: arecoline and arecaidine. The most common alkaloid of areca nut is arecoline (1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-1-methyl-pyridinecarboxylic acid; molecular weight 155.19 Da) followed by arecaidine (1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-1-methyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid; molecular weight 141.17 Da). Some other alkaloids are also present in minor amounts in areca nut such as guvacine, guvacoline, and arecolinidine.11 Arecaidine stimulates collagen synthesis and proliferation in a dose-dependent manner and higher concentrations being cytotoxic.37 Arecoline and arecaidine synthesize greater concentration of collagen to promote submucous fibrosis.38

(B) Polyphenols: Two major polyphenols of areca nut include catechin and flavonoids. During chewing of gutkha, oxidation of polyphenols stains the oral soft tissue and hard tissue in typical red color. They stabilize collagen fibers and retard their degradation process.37,39

(C) Tannins: Tannins are polyphenols that are capable of precipitating collagen proteins. The outer portion of the areca nut predominantly contains gallotannic acid that cause cross linking of collagen fibers and making them resistant to collagenase enzyme.37,39

3. Slaked lime

The lime powder is used to enhance the stimulant effect of the betel nut. This occurs as it hydrolyses the arecoline from the nut to produce the central nervous stimulant.40 The calcium hydroxide content of lime leads to alkaline conditions in the oral cavity with the presence of areca nut which is a major factor responsible for the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS causes oxidative damage in the DNA of cells.41 Lime is also known to cause irritation and hyperplasia of the oral mucosa.37

4. Catechu

Catechu is a reddish-brown substance used in gutkha as an astringent.11 Tannin and polyphenols are the main constituents of catechu. Catechu combined with lime at an alkaline pH is the most potent producer of ROS.37,42 Catechu has mutagenic and clastogenic activity.11

5. Flavoring agents

Musk ambrette and musk xylene are well known synthetic flavouring agents used in gutkha preparations. Their presence has been detected in the saliva of chewers of betel quid with tobacco. Of the two agents, musk ambrette was found to be mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium TA100, in comparison to musk xylene which lacked mutagenicity in Salmonella/microsome test.42,43

6. Others

A wide range of toxic metals including mercury, lead, cadmium, chromium, zinc, arsenic, nickel, and high percentage of copper and other trace elements have been found in Indian tobacco product, gutkha.2,44 The copper content in raw and processed areca nut is higher than other nuts.11

Mechanism of gutkha carcinogenicity (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Mechanism of carcinogenicity in gutkha and pan masala (pan masala + tobacco)

Physical trauma

Gutkha contains a large amount of areca nut which has abrasive nature causing repeated mechanical trauma to the oral mucosa.45,46 Because of the fine particle size of gutkha, there is a high probability of particle adhesion to physically abraded mucosa.37

Inflammation

Inflammation is now regarded as an important hallmark of cancer.47 Chronic use of gutkha causes oral mucous membrane damage leading to inflammation and increased ROS and cytokine levels.48

Genotoxicity and carcinogenesis

TSNAs in the saliva of chewers are derived from tobacco. Areca nut and catechu are capable of generating superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide at pH > 9.5.37 During this procedure, ROS concentration increases as soon as the areca nut and catechu polyphenols mix together in presence of slaked lime in the saliva of gutkha chewers. The formation of high level of ROS close to the traumatized oral mucosa can cause direct damage to the tissue.19,37

ROS and oxidative stress induce cell proliferation and apoptosis. Chronic use of gutkha induce oral potentially malignant disorders and subsequent malignancy.37

The genotoxic effects are most likely caused by the combination of tobacco and ASNAs in gutkha.42 TSNAs are procarcinogens that ultimately convert into carcinogens. DNA bases have some nucleophilic sites that react with metabolites. Some studies stated that microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) system activates49 tobacco mutagens like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), N-nitrosamines, aromatic amines, and benzene. Metabolism of carcinogens converts them into harmful reactive species which leads to DNA damage.50,51

DNA repair mechanism maintains the DNA integrity and prevents cancer development. These smokeless products are affecting the DNA repair pathway leading to genotoxicity and eventually cell death.52

The quantity of ROS can cause cellular damage as well as DNA damage.52,53 The TSNAs can cause DNA mutation and by altering the protein function may cause oral carcinogenesis.37,52,54

Why should gutkha be banned?

Gutkha mainly is used by men under the age of 50 years.6,45,55-57 It also is used by women including pregnant ones.58-61 Nowadays, use of gutkha has increased very rapidly in minors as well.8,25,62 It is highly addictive comparing to other tobacco products.63 It contains high carcinogenic products like areca nut and tobacco.11,19,64 Roughly, 5 million children under the age of 15 have been estimated to be gutkha addicts.65,66 Some persons spit in public places like hospitals, schools, bus stands, railway stations, etc., and make them dirty. These unhygienic areas provide the favorable environment for bacterial and viral growth.

How gutkha affects the health?

The use of smokeless tobacco has oral health consequences and it may also affect other parts of the body. The most serious consequences are enumerated in table 2.67-69

Table 2.

Effect of gutkha on health

Clinical Changes Functional Changes
Extra Oral Intra Oral Poor oral hygiene,37,72 varying degree of trismus or inability to open the mouth,72,73 speech,72,73 swallowing,72,73 reduced salivary outflow,72,73 dysphagia,72,73 hearing72,73
Sunken cheek72 Whitening of the oral mucosa72
Stiff cheek72 Reduced and stiff oral aperture72,73
Pseudo-proptosis72 Bald tongue72,74
Multiple perioral skin folds72 Discoloration of the commissures72
Pseudo malar prominence72 Retracted erythematous soft palate and uvula75
Forward pointing uvula72
Loss of tonsillar bulge72
Oral melanosis72
Chronic non healing ulcers72,74
Oral submucous fibrosis81,82
Oral cancer11,37,83
Calculus72
Discoloration of tooth78
Dental caries72,77
Attrition76
Erosion72
Extreme sensitivity in teeth37,72,76
Gingivitis79-81
Periodontitis13,80
Loss of gingivobuccal sulcus72

Long term use of gutkha affects general health leading to loss of concentration, loss of appetite, unusual sleep patterns, anemia, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), stroke, head and neck cancers, and other cancers.22,44,51,70-72

Why is the use of gutkha spreading?

Gutkha abuse is spreading due to its bright-color packaging, appealing fragrance, easy availability, and low price. It is popular among adolescents and low socioeconomic group. Now, symptoms of oral cancer are often appearing in very early age.51,57

In India, it has been observed that the tobacco industry has now shifted focus to advertising at point to sale outlets by exploiting loopholes in relevant portions of the cigarettes and other tobacco products act (COTPA).84,85

What has been done? (Table 3)

Table 3.

Description of acts against use of tobacco

Act Description about act
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (1954) Required warnings on all chewing forms of tobacco
Drugs and Cosmetics Act (1940), and amendment rules, 1992 By this amendment, the central government banned the manufacturing and sale of toothpastes and toothpowders containing tobacco. The Supreme Court supported the ban, invoking Article 19 (6) of the Constitution in the public interest.
CCFS under Director-General of Health Services 29 This committee recommended the appointment of a special expert committee at the central government level to ban chewing tobacco on health grounds
Act, 2003 no. 34 of 2003, (The Gazette of India) Dated:18 may 2003 The cigarette and other tobacco products (Prohibition of advertisement and regulation of trade and commerce production, supply and distribution)90
India's health warnings policy was drafted in 2006. It was came to force on 11 February 2007 Two pictorial warnings were rotated on cigarette packages and a separate warning was rotated on all smokeless tobacco products. (40% of principal area)91
Order- S.O. 2815(E), dated: 28 November. 2008 Specified health warnings to be displayed on all tobacco products packs (WEF. 31 may 2009)34
Act, 2003 no. 34 of 2003, (The Gazette of India) Dated:18 may 2003 New four pictorial warnings were rotated on cigarette packages and a separate warning was rotated on all smokeless tobacco products. Government amended it on 27 may 2011 and came into force in 1 December 2011.92
Act, 2003 no. 34 of 2003, (The Gazette of India) Dated: 18 may 2003 On September 27, 2012, India proposed a new round of picture warnings that were to be required as of April 1, 2013, although implementation of these warnings varied. A set of 3 new pictorial warnings were developed for smoked tobacco products, and a separate set of 3 new warnings were developed for smokeless tobacco products. Health warnings were required to cover 40% of the front of all cigarette packages.
Act, 2003 no. 34 of 2003, (The Gazette of India) Dated: 18 may 2003 On October 15, 2014, the government proposed larger warnings that cover 85% of the front and back of the pack.
Act, 2003 no. 34 of 2003, (The Gazette of India) Dated: 18 may 2003 The larger warnings were initially scheduled to come into effect from April 1, 2015, but the deadline was extended until April 1, 2016.

WEF: With effect from; CCFS: Central Committee for Food Standards

In India, gutkha was temporarily banned in March 2011 as its plastic packaging was found to be harmful to the environment.86 After this, gutkha was banned under the Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition) Act (FSSA), 2006, section 30 (2) (a), Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Additives) Regulations, 2011 (Regulation 3.1.7), and Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition and Restrictions on Sales) Regulations, 2011 (Regulation 2.3.4) which ban any food product known to contain injurious adulterants like nicotine. The Indian government and Supreme Court argument for the ban was based on the association of these substances with cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders.11,37

Under Indian laws, gutkha is considered as a food item.85,87,88 Some states like Kerala, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Haryana, Delhi, Goa, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Punjab, and Mizoram have stopped its sale, production, and supply.82 The remaining states also are in the process like Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Chandigarh, Tamil Nadu, and Orissa. Until May 2013, 26 states banned gutkha.

Campaign against gutkha ban

After some Indian states imposed the ban on the production and supply of gutkha, the tobacco industry launched an aggressive advertising drive against the ban. In the print media, a series of advertisements were released in cooperation with the Central Areca-nut and Cocoa Marketing and Processing Co-operation (CAMPCO), Smokeless Tobacco Association, and all India Kattha Factories Association.

Discussion

Gutkha is a generic name of an Indian variant of smokeless tobacco with high level of carcinogens.31,45 It is a common practice in south-east Asia for betel nut and tobacco chewing. Approximately 40% of the tobacco consumed in India is in smokeless form.88 Consumption of chewing gutkha/pan masala are very common in India in almost all age groups, due to which many health related problems are arising rapidly.

The high concentration of nicotine in gutkha appears to be responsible for addiction.25 TSNAs are potent carcinogens and their metabolism correlates with carcinogenesis.35,48,50 The chemicals present in gutkha form ROS and affect the DNA repair pathways.89-91

Tobacco is one of the most important preventable risks to human health and an important cause of premature death worldwide.34 Oral cancer has a vast potential for prevention,92 accounting for up to 30%-40% of malignancies in India.93

For many years the gutkha companies have long evaded the government policies and sustained their business. They use the loopholes of law and policies, and are still manufacturing and marketing in some states as separate packing of tobacco and pan masala. The ban has been imposed under the provision of centrally enacted FSSA 2006, section 30 (2) (a) and Food Safety and Standards regulations.82 Now, the tobacco companies state that gutkha is not a food product.

Health experts and advertising industry members feel that the anti-tobacco movement and pictorial warnings on tobacco packs may not have desired impact on India, as the tobacco lobby is powerful in the country. The ban has only set in motion an increase in number of processes by altering the pattern of packaging, stocking, selling, and use of tobacco products.94

What is required in the future?

With the anti-tobacco movement getting stronger on the one side and the tobacco lobby and the revenue on the other side, we should wait to see what steps are taken by the government.95

Effective comprehensive tobacco control laws that can impact on reduced consumption are needed. Rules and regulations with sufficient influential policies are required to clarify the role of tobacco use.96

The aim of this review was to increase the attention of government to complete ban of tobacco use, awareness, knowledge, and beliefs of public about the harms of not only gutkha but also all other tobacco products, and to promote the intentions to quit the habits.

Conclusion

Gutkha consumption is quite alarming in present scenario. The widespread use of gutkha has attracted all age groups and genders, making it easier to chew tobacco without attached social sanction. This review is an effort to highlight the effects of Indian products of flavored tobacco clinically and functionally on human body.

Acknowledgments

None.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

The Authors have no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Warnakulasuriya S, Sutherland G, Scully C. Tobacco, oral cancer, and treatment of dependence. Oral Oncol. 2005;41(3):244–60. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reddy KS, Gupta RC. Report on tobacco control in India. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Raute LJ, Sansone G, Pednekar MS, Fong GT, Gupta PC, Quah AC, et al. Knowledge of health effects and intentions to quit among smokeless tobacco users in India: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) India Pilot Survey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(5):1233–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bathi RJ, Parveen S, Burde K. The role of gutka chewing in oral submucous fibrosis: A case-control study. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(6):e19–e25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khanna S. The interaction between tobacco use and oral health among tribes in central India. Tob Induc Dis. 2012;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-10-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gupta PC. Mouth cancer in India: A new epidemic? J Indian Med Assoc. 1999;97(9):370–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Boffetta P, Hecht S, Gray N, Gupta P, Straif K. Smokeless tobacco and cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(7):667–75. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70173-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chaturvedi P. Gutka consumption. Br Dent J. 2009;206(8):397. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.World Health Organization . Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) India, 2009-2010. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sarkar BK, Reddy KS. Priorities for tobacco control research in India. Addiction. 2012;107(12):2066–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03942.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Betel-quid and areca-nut chewing and some areca-nut derived nitrosamines. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2004;85:1–334. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Warad S, Chaudhari HL, Ashok N, Jenifer HD. Clinical evaluation of gutkha chewing and pattern of bone loss in periodontitis. World J Dent. 2014;5(4):199–203. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kyaing NN, Islam MA, Sinha DN, Rinchen S. Social, economic and legal dimensions of tobacco and its control in South-East Asia region. Indian J Public Health. 2011;55(3):161–8. doi: 10.4103/0019-557X.89944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mishra GA, Kulkarni SV, Gupta SD, Shastri SS. Smokeless tobacco use in Urban Indian women: Prevalence and predictors. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2015;36(3):176–82. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.166739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bhonsle RB, Murti RB, Gupta PC. Tobacco habit in India. In: Gupta PC, Hamner JE, Murti PR, editors. Control of tobacco-related cancers and other diseases: Proceedings of an international symposium, January 15-19, 1990, TIFR, Bombay. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1992. pp. 25–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Madani AH, Dikshit M, Bhaduri D. Risk for oral cancer associated to smoking, smokeless and oral dip products. Indian J Public Health. 2012;56(1):57–60. doi: 10.4103/0019-557X.96977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Joshi PS, Prashant MC, Nagpal N, Patil AA, Ahuja R, Mathur V. Gutkha addiction: Nicotine dependence or a conditioned reflex? J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(Suppl 2):45–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.RamIal G, Reddy V, Venkateshwarulu N, Shalini K, Patil R. Significance of oral brush cytology of oral mucosal lesions in gutkha chewers: A prospective study. J IndAcad Oral Med Radiol. 2011;23(4):539–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Smokeless Tobacco and Some Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Asma S, Backinger C. Smokeless Tobacco fact sheets.. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Smokeless Tobacco; 2002 Sep. 22-25; Stockholm, Sweden. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gangwal K. What is gutka? [Online]. 2001. Available from: URL: http://www.antigutkha.com/whatisgutkha.html.
  • 22.Gupta PC. Gutka: A major new tobacco hazard in India. Tob Control. 1999;8(2):134. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.2.132b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gupta PC, Ray CS, Sinha DN, Singh PK. Smokeless tobacco: A major public health problem in the SEA region: A review. Indian J Public Health. 2011;55(3):199–209. doi: 10.4103/0019-557X.89948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kharat P, Shailendra S, Bhushan P. Gutka-a malignant entity seeks benign exit in India. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(3):245–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mukherjee K, Hadaye RS. Gutkha consumption and its determinants among secondary school male students. Indian J Community Med. 2006;31(3):177. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Changrani J, Gany FM, Cruz G, Kerr R, Katz R. Paan and Gutka use in the united states: A pilot study in Bangladeshi and Indian-Gujarati immigrants in New York City. J Immigr Refug Stud. 2006;4(1):99–110. doi: 10.300/J500v04n01_07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Benowitz NL. Nicotine and SmokelessTobacco. Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 1988;38(4):244–7. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.38.4.244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Anwar S, Williams SA, Scott-Smith J, Sage H, Baweja S, Singal M, et al. A comparison of attitudes and practices of gutka users and non-users in Chitrakoot, India. A pilot. Prim Dent Care. 2005;12(1):5–10. doi: 10.1308/1355761052894176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nichter M, Nichter M, Van Sickle D. Popular perceptions of tobacco products and patterns of use among male college students in India. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(2):415–31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bhisey RA. Chemistry and toxicology of smokeless tobacco. Indian J Cancer. 2012;49(4):364–72. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.107735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hoffmann D, Brunnemann KD, Prokopczyk B, Djordjevic MV. Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines and Areca-derived N-nitrosamines: Chemistry, biochemistry, carcinogenicity, and relevance to humans. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1994;41(1):1–52. doi: 10.1080/15287399409531825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chaudhry K. Is pan masala-containing tobacco carcinogenic? Natl Med J India. 1999;12(1):21–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stepanov I, Hecht SS, Ramakrishnan S, Gupta PC. Tobacco-specific nitrosamines in smokeless tobacco products marketed in India. Int J Cancer. 2005;116(1):16–9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US) National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health (US) How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xue J, Yang S, Seng S. Mechanisms of cancer induction by tobacco-specific NNK and NNN. Cancers (Basel) 2014;6(2):1138–56. doi: 10.3390/cancers6021138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bhisey RA. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of pan masala: A review. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad B. 2000;66(1):1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nair U, Bartsch H, Nair J. Alert for an epidemic of oral cancer due to use of the betel quid substitutes gutkha and pan masala: A review of agents and causative mechanisms. Mutagenesis. 2004;19(4):251–62. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geh036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jeng JH, Lan WH, Hahn LJ, Hsieh CC, Kuo MY. Inhibition of the migration, attachment, spreading, growth and collagen synthesis of human gingival fibroblasts by arecoline, a major areca alkaloid, in vitro. J Oral Pathol Med. 1996;25(7):371–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1996.tb00281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jeng JH, Chang MC, Hahn LJ. Role of areca nut in betel quid-associated chemical carcinogenesis: Current awareness and future perspectives. Oral Oncol. 2001;37(6):477–92. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(01)00003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Norton SA. Betel: Consumption and consequences. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38(1):81–8. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70543-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nair UJ, Friesen M, Richard I, MacLennan R, Thomas S, Bartsch H. Effect of lime composition on the formation of reactive oxygen species from areca nut extract in vitro. Carcinogenesis. 1990;11(12):2145–8. doi: 10.1093/carcin/11.12.2145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chadha P, Yadav JS. Studies on the genotoxicity of gutkha. Int J Hum Genet. 2011;11(4):277–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nair J, Ohshima H, Malaveille C, Friesen M, O'Neill IK, Hautefeuille A, et al. Identification, occurrence and mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium of two synthetic nitroarenes, musk ambrette and musk xylene, in Indian chewing tobacco and betel quid. Food Chem Toxicol. 1986;24(1):27–31. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(86)90260-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Willis DN, Popovech MA, Gany F, Hoffman C, Blum JL, Zelikoff JT. Toxicity of gutkha, a smokeless tobacco product gone global: Is there more to the toxicity than nicotine? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(1):919–33. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110100919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gupta PC, Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of areca nut usage. Addict Biol. 2002;7(1):77–83. doi: 10.1080/13556210020091437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ali FM, Aher V, Prasant MC, Bhushan P, Mudhol A, Suryavanshi H. Oral submucous fibrosis: Comparing clinical grading with duration and frequency of habit among areca nut and its products chewers. J Cancer Res Ther. 2013;9(3):471–6. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.119353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dwivedi S, Goel A, Mandhani A, Khattri S, Pant KK. Tobacco exposure may enhance inflammation in prostate carcinoma patients: An explorative study in north Indian population. Toxicol Int. 2012;19(3):310–8. doi: 10.4103/0971-6580.103681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dwivedi S, Goel A, Khattri S, Mandhani A, Sharma P, Pant KK. Tobacco exposure by various modes may alter proinflammatory (IL-12) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) levels and affects the survival of prostate carcinoma patients: An explorative study in North Indian population. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:158530. doi: 10.1155/2014/158530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guengerich FP. Common and uncommon cytochrome P450 reactions related to metabolism and chemical toxicity. Chem Res Toxicol. 2001;14(6):611–50. doi: 10.1021/tx0002583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hang B. Formation and repair of tobacco carcinogen-derived bulky DNA adducts. J Nucleic Acids. 2010;2010:709521. doi: 10.4061/2010/709521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jyoti Sen D, Dadida C, Dhliwayo P. Gutkha as a charm in in-vitro & harm in in-vivo: A devil in disguise. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;3(11):1400–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bagchi M, Balmoori J, Bagchi D, Stohs SJ, Chakrabarti J, Das DK. Role of reactive oxygen species in the development of cytotoxicity with various forms of chewing tobacco and pan masala. Toxicology. 2002;179(3):247–55. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(02)00357-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Coppe JP, Boysen M, Sun CH, Wong BJ, Kang MK, Park NH, et al. A role for fibroblasts in mediating the effects of tobacco-induced epithelial cell growth and invasion. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6(7):1085–98. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jyoti S, Khan S, Naz F, Rahul Farhad A, Ali F, Siddique YH. Assessment of DNA damage by panmasala, gutkha chewing and smoking in buccal epithelial cells using alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE). Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2013;14(4):391–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gupta PC, Ray CS, Murti PR, Sinha DN. Rising incidence of oral cancer in Ahmedabad city. Indian J Cancer. 2014;51(Suppl 1):S67–S72. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.147476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mahapatra S, Kamath R, Shetty BK, Binu VS. Risk of oral cancer associated with gutka and other tobacco products: a hospital-based case-control study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2015;11(1):199–203. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.143332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chadda RK, Sengupta SN. Tobacco use by Indian adolescents. Tob Induc Dis. 2002;1(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-1-2-111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gupta PC, Subramoney S. Smokeless tobacco use and risk of stillbirth: A cohort study in Mumbai, India. Epidemiology. 2006;17(1):47–51. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000190545.19168.c4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.World Health Organization. Review of areca (Betel) nut and tobacco use in the pacific: A technical report. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nayak SS. Risk factors associated with gutkha addiction: An empirical study in Cuttack city of Odisha. J Sociology Soc Anth. 2011;2(2):89–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nair S, Schensul JJ, Begum S, Pednekar MS, Oncken C, Bilgi SM, et al. Use of smokeless tobacco by Indian women aged 18-40 years during pregnancy and reproductive years. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Javed F, Chotai M, Mehmood A, Almas K. Oral mucosal disorders associated with habitual gutka usage: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(6):857–64. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.BBC News Health, chewing tobacco cancer warning [Online]. 1999. Available from: URL: http:/news.bb.co.uk/1/hi/health/398630.stm.
  • 64.Varughese A. Gutka- A Silent Killer [Online]. 2003. Available from: URL: file:///C:/Users/Hamid%20Computer%20Group/Desktop/ref%2064.pdf.
  • 65.Vinod Kumar Tikoo S, Dhawan A, Pattanayak RD, Chopra A. Assessment of pattern and profile of substance use among children in India. New Delhi, India: National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mishra GA, Pimple SA, Shastri SS. An overview of the tobacco problem in India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2012;33(3):139–45. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.103139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Winn DM. Smokeless Tobacco and Cancer: The epidemiologic evidence. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 1988;38(4):236–43. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.38.4.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Weintraub JA, Burt BA. Periodontal effects and dental caries associated with smokeless tobacco use. Public Health Rep. 1987;102(1):30–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Siegel D, Benowitz N, Ernster VL, Grady DG, Hauck WW. Smokeless tobacco, cardiovascular risk factors, and nicotine and cotinine levels in professional baseball players. Am J Public Health. 1992;82(3):417–21. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.3.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Monson AL, Beaulieu JA. Smokeless tobacco use and knowledge among university students. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. 2011;9(1):1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Nilsson R. Possible carcinogenicity of smokeless tobacco. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(6):1582–3. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chaturvedi P. Gutka or areca nut chewer's syndrome. Indian J Cancer. 2009;46(2):170–2. doi: 10.4103/0019-509x.49158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Nigam NK, Aravinda K, Dhillon M, Gupta S, Reddy S, Srinivas RM. Prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis among habitual gutkha and areca nut chewers in Moradabad district. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2014;4(1):8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2013.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ambika L, Keluskar V, Hugar S, Patil S. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions and variations in Indian public school children. Braz J Oral Sci. 2011;10(4):288. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Duggirala TL, Marthala M, Gannepalli A, Podduturi SR. Oral submucous fibrosis in children: Report of three cases and review. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2015;27(1):105–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kumar S, Parmar G, Saiyed HN. Nut and tobacco chewing. Br Dent J. 2004;197(6):292. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chaturvedi P. Gutka consumption. Br Dent J. 2009;206(8):397. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Mallikarjuna R, Gangwal RR, Shanthraj SL, Dave B. Report of gutkha (smokeless tobacco) use in children aged 10-12 years. BMJ Case Reports. 2013;2012:008319. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-008319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kumar A, Mythri S, Hegde S, Rajesh KS. Effect of chewing gutkha on oral hygiene, gingival and periodontal status. J Oral Health Res. 2012;3(3):26–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Malagi S, Hegde S, Kashyup R, Maiya AK, Mohan S. Effects of smokeless tobacco on gingival and periodontal status in adults: A case control study. Univ Res J Dent. 2013;3(2):47–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ahmad MS, Ali SA, Ali AS, Chaubey KK. Epidemiological and etiological study of oral submucous fibrosis among gutkha chewers of Patna, Bihar, India. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006;24(2):84–9. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.26022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Nayak AG, Chhaparwal Y, Pai KM. The hazards of gutka chewing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110(5):548–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.05.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gupta PC, Ray CS. Epidemiology of betel quid usage. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33(4 Suppl):31–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Patel S, Rendell H, Maudgal S, Oswal K. Tobacco industry tactics with advertisements at the point of sale in Mumbai. Indian J Cancer. 2013;50(3):245–9. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.118743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jakszyn P, Gonzalez CA. Nitrosamine and related food intake and gastric and oesophageal cancer risk: A systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(27):4296–303. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i27.4296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. News analysis. Tobacco Control. 2011;20(2):89–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Dhumal GG, Gupta PC. Assessment of gutka ban in Maharashtra: Findings from a focus group discussion. Int J Head Neck Surg. 2013;4(3):115–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Shetty P. Pan masala plus tobacco is equal to Gutka square-new formulation of tobacco in India after the Gutka ban. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(24):10991–2. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.24.10991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hatsukami DK, Zeller M, Gupta PC, editors. Smokeless Tobacco and Public Health: A Global Perspective. Bethesda, MD: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Institutes of Health; 2014. Health Consequences of Smokeless Tobacco Use. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Babu S, Sesikeran B, Bhat RV. Oral fibrosis among teenagers chewing tobacco, areca nut, and Pan masala. Lancet. 1996;348(9028):692. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)65123-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Pershagen G. Smokeless tobacco. Br Med Bull. 1996;52(1):50–7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Hecht SS, Carmella SG, Murphy SE, Riley WT, Le C, Luo X, et al. Similar exposure to a tobacco-specific carcinogen in smokeless tobacco users and cigarette smokers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(8):1567–72. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Chang MC, Chiang CP, Lin CL, Lee JJ, Hahn LJ, Jeng JH. Cell-mediated immunity and head and neck cancer: With special emphasis on betel quid chewing habit. Oral Oncol. 2005;41(8):757–75. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Nair S, Schensul JJ, Bilgi S, Kadam V, D'Mello S, Donta B. Local responses to the Maharashtra gutka and pan masala ban: A report from Mumbai. Indian J Cancer. 2012;49(4):443–7. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.107754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Naik NS. Tobacco: National and international perspective. Karnataka, India: Centre for Multi-Disciplinary Development Research; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Pimple S, Gunjal S, Mishra GA, Pednekar MS, Majmudar P, Shastri SS. Compliance to Gutka ban and other provisons of COTPA in Mumbai. Indian J Cancer. 2014;51(Suppl 1):S60–S66. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.147475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Addiction & Health are provided here courtesy of Kerman University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES