Abstract
Objective(s):
Regarding the global burden of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) infections, prevention and treatment of such infections play a significant role in healthcare management. The inordinate use of fluoroquinolones led to a worldwide spread of quinolone-resistant strains. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate mutations in codons 83 and 106 of gyrA gene in UPEC isolates in the north of Iran.
Materials and Methods:
This cross-sectional study performed on a total of 223 UPEC isolates which were recovered within 6 months in 2017. Isolates were identified and confirmed by standard microbiologic tests, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out by disk diffusion and E-test methods. PCR reaction was performed to amplify gyrA gene, and PCR-RFLP was performed using BsiEI and BstUI restriction enzymes to investigate mutations in gyrA gene.
Results:
The nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and norfloxacin resistance rates were 61.9%, 50.2%, 48.25, and 45.3%, respectively. Overall, 55.2% of E. coli isolates had a mutation in gyrA gene in codon 83, and 20.2% in codon 106. Also, 15.2% of isolates had simultaneously mutation. Moreover, a significant association was found between mutations in gyrA gene and quinolone and fluoroquinolones resistance pattern of UPEC isolates.
Conclusion:
Our results revealed a high level of quinolone resistance associated with the mutations in gyrA among the clinical isolates of UPEC in our region. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first investigation on the role of gyrA alteration in quinolone resistance among UPEC isolates from the north of Iran.
Key Words: Uropathogenic Escherichia coli, Quinolone, Antibiotic resistance, gyrA, PCR-RFLP
Introduction
Quinolones are one of the synthetic antibiotics which extensively used worldwide (1, 2). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) were treated by first-generation (acidic) quinolones, including nalidixic acid (1). However, the range of effectiveness has improved by alteration of the following generations. One of these changes was the addition of a fluorine atom at position C-6 of antibiotic molecules which leads to extensive powerful activity against different Gram-negative bacteria (3, 4). Fluoroquinolones bind to and impede the activity of topoisomerase II (DNA gyrase) and topoisomerase IV (parC and parE) (4). DNA gyrase comprised of two subunits A and two subunits B, which are encoded by the gyrA and gyrB genes, respectively (5).
Extensive and inordinate consumption of antibiotics over the recent years has been leading to increasing trends of antibiotic resistant bacteria (6, 7). Nowdays, with the advancement of antibiotic resistance mechanisms, the issue of antibiotic resistance become an important concern in the health systems (6, 8, 9).
In Escherichia coli, resistance to quinolones frequently occurs through mutation in gyrA and less often by gyrB genes, which catalyzes ATP-dependent DNA supercoiling (5). Some other mechanisms of E. coli resistance to quinolones and fluoroquinolones are through efflux pumps and reduced drug accumulation in the bacteria due to changes in the purine protein (4, 10). Many studies have revealed that mutations in a small parts of gyrA N-terminal (Amino acids 67 (Ala-67) to 106 (Gln-106)) leads to quinolones and fluoroquinolones resistance which is named quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) (11). Meanwhile, the most of the mutations arose in nucleotide 248 and 620, causes amino acids aspartic acid 83 and serine 87 alterations (12).
Among the point mutations, the most relevant altration is that on nucleotide 247 (Ser-83) of the gyrA gene (10, 13). In clinical isolates, the second most commonly observed mutation is at codon 87 of gyrA gene (14). Some studies have reported that resistant bacteria to quinolones had no mutation in the codon 83 gyrA gene. Also in some cases despite mutation in codon 83 gyrA gene, the bacteria were susceptible to quinolones. It has been supposed that such resistant strains may have a point mutation in other sites or along with codon 83 in the gyrA gene which may lead to high-level resistance to quinolones (5, 14). A few studies have surveyed the effect of the mutation on codon 106 in conferring resistance to quinolones (15). To our best knowledge, there is no report about the investigation on mutation in the codon 106 among clinical E. coli in Iran.
Mutations in gyrA gene can be identified with several methods such as sequencing, single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) and mismatch amplification mutation assay PCR (MAMA-PCR), but these techniques are quite expensive and time-consuming (16). PCR-RFLP is one of the best methods for identifying the point mutation in a sequence of DNA. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate mutations in codons 83 and 106 of gyrA gene in susceptible and resistant isolates of uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) in the north of Iran.
Materials and Methods
Study design and bacterial isolation
This cross-sectional study was performed to assess the importance of gyrA gene mutations in quinolone and fluoroquinolone resistance in 1250 urine samples (mid-stream, clean catch) which were collected in a period of 6 months from February 2017 to June 2017. Samples obtained from the patients with UTIs who referred to a tertiary hospital (Razi hospital) in the Rasht, the north of Iran. This study was in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and approved by the regional Ethics Committee. The specimens plated on Blood agar (Quelab, Canada) and Eosin Methylene Blue agar (Pronadisa, Italy) plates. The plates were incubated overnight at 37ºC. Then, colonies with green metallic sheen were supposed as E. coli and identified by standard microbiological tests including Gram stain, oxidase, and differential biochemical tests including Triple Sugar Iron agar, Simmons' citrate agar, Christensen’s urea agar, Indole test, Methyl red and Voges-Proskauer tests. The confirmed isolates were stored in Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) with 15% glycerol at -70ºC for long preservation.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility testing
All of the E. coli isolates were tested for susceptibility to quinolone and fluoroquinolone including nalidixic acid (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), and norfloxacin (10 µg) (MAST, UK) by standard disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar medium (Merck, Germany) as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (17). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by E-test (Lioflichem, Italy) as described by the CLSI recommendation. E. coli ATCC 25922 strain was used as quality control purposes.
DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Genomic DNA of all isolates was extracted using High pure DNA template preparation kit (Roche, Germany) as stated by manufacturer instruction. PCR reaction was performed to amplify gyrA gene in Quinolone resistant determining region (QRDR) using specific primers, gyrA-F: 5’-GCT GCC AGA TGT CCG AGA T-3’, gyrA-R: 5’-TCC GTG CCG TCA TAG TTA TCA-3’. Reaction condition was initiated by pre-denaturation at 95 ºC for 5 min followed by 45 cycles (94ºC for 1 min 60ºC for 30 sec 72ºC for 30 sec) and final extension cycle (72ºC for 5 min). A 360 bp band on agarose gel containing DNA safe stain (Cinnagen, Iran) was visualized under UV Tran illuminator.
PCR-Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)
In order to detection of mutation in 83 and 106 codons of gyrA gene, PCR-RFLP was performed using BsiEI and BstUI restriction enzymes (Thermo fisher scientific Inc., USA). The source of BstUI restriction enzyme is Bacillus stearothermophilus U458 and, BsiEI was getting from an E. coli strain that carries the cloned BsiEI gene from Bacillus sp. The cutting site for BstUI is (5 CG CG 3 or 3 GC GC 5) and for BsiEI is (5…CGRY CG…3 or 3…GC YRGC…5). The 360 bp PCR products were digested using both enzymes simultaneously according to manufacturer guideline. The digested fragments were subjected to electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel stained with DNA safe stain and was visualized under UV Tran illuminator.
Statistical analysis
Resistance rates among the isolates and comparisons of fluoroquinolones resistance and mutation in the gyrA gene were analyzed with Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. A difference was considered statistically significant if the P-value was less than 0.05.
Results
Among 223 isolated UPEC isolates, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and norfloxacin resistance rates were approximately similar (50.2%, 48.25, and 45.3%, respectively), whereas a higher level of resistance to nalidixic acid was seen (61.9%) (Table1). Moreover, the full results of antibiotic susceptibility testing including MIC50 and MIC90 (MIC at which 50% and 90% of isolates were inhibited) of the tested isolates are shown in Table 2.
Table 1.
Antibiotic |
Resistant
|
Intermediate- resistant
|
Susceptible
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |
Nalidixic acid | 138 | 61.9 | 7 | 3.1 | 78 | 35 |
Ciprofloxacin | 112 | 50.2 | 7 | 3.1 | 104 | 46.6 |
Ofloxacin | 109 | 48.9 | 2 | 0.9 | 112 | 50.2 |
Norfloxacin | 101 | 45.3 | 1 | 0.4 | 121 | 54.3 |
Table 2.
Antibiotics | MIC value of strip | MIC50 (µg/mL) | MIC90 (µg/mL) | MIC range (µg/mL) | Susceptible rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nalidixic acid | 0.016-256 | 32 | >256 | 2-256 | 35 |
Ciprofloxacin | 0.002-32 | 16 | >32 | 0.094-32 | 46.6 |
Ofloxacin | 0.002-32 | 4 | >32 | 0.094-32 | 50.2 |
Norfloxacin | 0.016-256 | 8 | 128 | 0.38-256 | 54.3 |
In the present study, 55.2% of E. coli isolates had a mutation in gyrA gene in codon 83. Mutation in codon 106 occurred in 20.2% of cases. Also, simultaneously mutation (codons 83 and 106) was observed in 15.2% of isolates.
Among wild-type strains there is one restriction site for BstUI at nucleotide 42 which yields 42 and 318 bp fragments after digestion, while in mutants, gyrA gene attains another restriction site at nucleotide 149 (Serine → Alanine). So, three fragments (42, 107 and 211 bp) are observed after digestion and electrophoresis. Also, BsiEI has two restriction sites at nucleotide 168 and 330 in wild-type strains which produces three fragments (390, 168 and 132 bp). If a mutation occurs in gyrA gene, a new restriction site developed at nucleotide 217, which produces 4 fragments (30, 168, 138 and 49).
The association between a mutation in codon 83, 106 or both and ciprofloxacin resistance pattern among E. coli isolates showed that mutation in codon 106 had the most effect on resistance to ciprofloxacin (Table 3). Our results revealed that simultaneously mutation in codon 83 and 106 conferred more resistance rate to norfloxacin among E. coli isolates (Table 4). In the present study, a mutation in codon 106 gyrA gene had the most effect on resistance to ofloxacin in E. coli isolates as such as ciprofloxacin (Table 5). Finally, E. coli isolates which had a mutation in both codons 83 and 106 gyrA gene were more resistant to nalidixic acid which was similar to norfloxacin (Table 6).
Table 3.
Resistance pattern | Resistant | Intermediate- resistant | Susceptible | P -value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mutation | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | ||
gyrA 83 | Yes | 73 | 59.3 | 1 | 0.8 | 49 | 39.8 | 0.002 |
No | 39 | 39 | 6 | 6 | 55 | 55 | 0.002 | |
gyrA 106 | Yes | 41 | 91.1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8.9 | <0.001 |
No | 71 | 39.9 | 7 | 3.9 | 100 | 56.2 | <0.001 | |
gyrA 83 &106 | Yes | 30 | 88.2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11.8 | <0.001 |
No | 82 | 43.4 | 7 | 3.7 | 100 | 52.9 | <0.001 |
Table 4.
Resistance pattern | Resistant | Intermediate- resistant | Susceptible | P -value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mutation | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | ||
gyrA 83 | Yes | 68 | 55.3 | 1 | 0.8 | 53 | 43.9 | 0.002 |
No | 33 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 67 | 0.002 | |
gyrA 106 | Yes | 38 | 84.4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 15.6 | <0.001 |
No | 63 | 35.4 | 1 | 0.6 | 114 | 64 | <0.001 | |
gyrA 83 &106 | Yes | 30 | 88.2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11.8 | <0.001 |
No | 71 | 37.6 | 1 | 0.5 | 117 | 61.9 | <0.001 |
Table 5.
Resistance pattern | Resistant | Intermediate- resistant | Susceptible | P -value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mutation | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | ||
gyrA 83 | Yes | 72 | 58.5 | 1 | 0.8 | 50 | 40.7 | 0.006 |
No | 37 | 37 | 1 | 1 | 62 | 62 | 0.006 | |
gyrA 106 | Yes | 42 | 93.3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6.7 | <0.001 |
No | 67 | 37.6 | 2 | 1.1 | 109 | 61.2 | <0.001 | |
gyrA 83 &106 | Yes | 31 | 91.2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8.8 | <0.001 |
No | 78 | 41.3 | 2 | 1.1 | 109 | 57.7 | <0.001 |
Table 6.
Resistance pattern | Resistant | Intermediate- resistant | Susceptible | P -value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mutation | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | ||
gyrA 83 | Yes | 93 | 75.6 | 3 | 2.4 | 27 | 22 | <0.001 |
No | 45 | 45 | 4 | 4 | 51 | 51 | <0.001 | |
gyrA 106 | Yes | 39 | 86.7 | 1 | 2.2 | 5 | 11.1 | 0.001 |
No | 99 | 56.6 | 6 | 3.4 | 73 | 41 | 0.001 | |
gyrA 83 &106 | Yes | 31 | 91.2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8.8 | <0.001 |
No | 107 | 56.6 | 7 | 3.7 | 75 | 39.7 | <0.001 |
Discussion
Regarding the global burden of UPEC infections, prevention and treatment of such infections play a significant role in healthcare management (18). Fluoroquinolones are an important class of antibiotics for the treatment of UPEC; however, the inordinate use of these agents led to a worldwide spread of quinolone-resistant strains, particularly in developing countries (19). In the present study, a remarkable rate of quinolones resistance (ranging from 45.3% to 61.9%) in 223 tested UPEC isolates were found. Despite the great discrepancy, the prevalence of quinolone-resistant UPEC isolates in our findings was consistent with the median values (range 14% to 71%) reported in different regions of the country (20-26). Based on the literature, the level of resistance to quinolones is increasing in other parts of the world, as well. Several reposts from Asian, European, African, and south-American countries indicate to the high prevalence of fluoroquinolones resistance even more than 50% and raised serious concerns (27-33). Meanwhile, our findings regarding the MICs of fluoroquinolones showed that the MIC ranges in resistant-strains is significantly high, and it seems that in clinical setting overcoming to this level of resistance even by using the higher dosages of MIC50/MIC90 values can be difficult. One explanation for such an observation in our findings may be due to the indiscriminate use of antibiotics in clinical settings, for example empirical therapy of uncomplicated UTIs by fluoroquinolones.
In this study, we investigated the prevalence of mutations in the gyrA genes as one of the principal mechanism of fluoroquinolones resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. Our results showed the highest prevalence of mutations regarded to the gyrA gene in codon 83 with 55.2% followed by mutation in codon 106 with 20.2%. Previously, several studies from Iran and other countries showed alteration in the GyrA protein is mostly associated with quinolones resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (4, 33-39).
Moreover, a double concomitant mutation in gyrA (codons 83 and 106) was observed in 15.2% of isolates. Previously, it has been documented that low-level fluoroquinolone resistance in E. coli is associated with a single mutation, while high-level resistance required double mutations (36). In accordance with this finding, we found the majority of double mutation (more than 80%) is associated with quinolone-resistant isolates.
Finally, despite the significant role of mutations in the QRDRs of gyrA, we found quinolone-resistant isolates without any mutations in this region. Therefore it is possible that other resistance mechanisms such as mutations in parC or the presence of horizontally acquired genes (qnr genes) may cause of quinolone resistance in our isolates (25, 36-38, 40).
As the main limitations of the present work, the lack of sequencing for confirming the RFLP results to reveals the exact status of base replacements among the mutant strains must be mentioned.
In summary, our results revealed a high level of quinolone resistance is associated with the mutations in gyrA among the clinical isolates of UPEC in our region. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first investigation on the role of gyrA alteration in quinolone resistance among UPEC isolates from north of Iran.
Acknowledgment
We thank all personals at Microbiology laboratory for their technical assistance. This study was supported by Guilan University of Medical Sciences.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References
- 1.Aldred KJ, Kerns RJ, Osheroff N. Mechanism of quinolone action and resistance. Biochemistry. 2014;53:1565–1574. doi: 10.1021/bi5000564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anvarinejad M, Farshad S, Alborzi A, Ranjbar R, Giammanco GM, Japoni A. Integron and genotype patterns of quinolones-resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2011;5:3736–3770. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ito CA, Gales AC, Tognim MC, Munerato P, Dalla Costa LM. Quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli. Braz J Infect Dis. 2008;12:5–9. doi: 10.1590/s1413-86702008000100003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Komp Lindgren P, Karlsson A, Hughes D. Mutation rate and evolution of fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from patients with urinary tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:3222–3232. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.10.3222-3232.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pourahmad Jaktaji R, Mohiti E. Study of Mutations in the DNA gyrase gyrA Gene of Escherichia coli. Iran J Pharm Res. 2010;9:43–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fair RJ, Tor Y. Antibiotics and bacterial resistance in the 21st century. Perspect Medicin Chem. 2014;6:25–64. doi: 10.4137/PMC.S14459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ghaffarian F, Hedayati M, Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie H, Atrkar Roushan Z, Mojtahedi A. Molecular epidemiology of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in intensive care units of a tertiary care hospital, North of Iran. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 2018;64:75–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Soltani B, Heidari H, Ebrahim-Saraie HS, Hadi N, Mardaneh J, Motamedifar M. Molecular characteristics of multiple and extensive drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates obtained from hospitalized patients in Southwestern Iran. Infez Med. 2018;26:67–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haghighatpanah M, Mozaffari Nejad AS, Mojtahedi A, Amirmozafari N, Zeighami H. Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and plasmid-borne blaCTX-M and blaTEM genes among clinical strains of Escherichia coli isolated from patients in the north of Iran. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2016;7:110–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2016.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vila J, Ruiz J, Marco F, Barcelo A, Goni P, Giralt E, et al. Association between double mutation in gyrA gene of ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and MICs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2477–2479. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.10.2477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Friedman SM, Lu T, Drlica K. Mutation in the DNA gyrase A Gene of Escherichia coli that expands the quinolone resistance-determining region. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:2378–2380. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.8.2378-2380.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Drlica K, Zhao X. DNA gyrase, topoisomerase IV, and the 4-quinolones. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61:377–392. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.61.3.377-392.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ruiz J, Gomez J, Navia MM, Ribera A, Sierra JM, Marco F, et al. High prevalence of nalidixic acid resistant, ciprofloxacin susceptible phenotype among clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and other Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002;42:257–261. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(01)00357-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Johnning A, Kristiansson E, Fick J, Weijdegard B, Larsson DG. Resistance Mutations in gyrA and parC are Common in Escherichia Communities of both Fluoroquinolone-Polluted and Uncontaminated Aquatic Environments. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1355. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ruiz J. Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones: target alterations, decreased accumulation and DNA gyrase protection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51:1109–1117. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cockerill FR 3rd. Genetic methods for assessing antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:199–212. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.2.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wayne PA. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI supplement M100) 27th ed 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bien J, Sokolova O, Bozko P. Role of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Virulence Factors in Development of Urinary Tract Infection and Kidney Damage. Int J Nephrol. 2012;2012:681473. doi: 10.1155/2012/681473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dalhoff A. Global fluoroquinolone resistance epidemiology and implictions for clinical use. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2012;2012:976273. doi: 10.1155/2012/976273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rezaee MA, Abdinia B. Etiology and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Pathogenic Bacteria in Children Subjected to UTI: A Referral Hospital-Based Study in Northwest of Iran. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1606. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sedighi I, Arabestani MR, Rahimbakhsh A, Karimitabar Z, Alikhani MY. Dissemination of Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamases and Quinolone Resistance Genes Among Clinical Isolates of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Children. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8:e19184. doi: 10.5812/jjm.19184v2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Momtaz H, Karimian A, Madani M, Safarpoor Dehkordi F, Ranjbar R, Sarshar M, et al. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Iran: serogroup distributions, virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance properties. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2013;12:8. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-12-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Neamati F, Firoozeh F, Saffari M, Zibaei M. Virulence Genes and Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolated From Hospitalized Patients in Kashan, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8:e17514. doi: 10.5812/jjm.17514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dehbanipour R, Rastaghi S, Sedighi M, Maleki N, Faghri J. High prevalence of multidrug-resistance uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, Isfahan, Iran. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2016;7:22–26. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.175020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ranjbar R, Farahani O. The Prevalence of Plasmid-mediated Quinolone Resistance Genes in Escherichia coli Isolated from Hospital Wastewater Sources in Tehran, Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2017;46:1285–1291. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ebrahim-Saraie HS, Nezhad NZ, Heidari H, Motamedifar A, Motamedifar M. Detection of Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Integrons Among Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Producing Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolates in Southwestern Iran. Oman Med J. 2018;33:218–223. doi: 10.5001/omj.2018.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shariff VAA, Shenoy MS, Yadav T, M R. The antibiotic susceptibility patterns of uropathogenic Escherichia coli, with special reference to the fluoroquinolones. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:1027–1030. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/4917.3038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Basu S, Mukherjee SK, Hazra A, Mukherjee M. Molecular Characterization of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli: Nalidixic Acid and Ciprofloxacin Resistance, Virulent Factors and Phylogenetic Background. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:2727–2731. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6613.3744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moreira da Silva RCR, de Oliveira Martins Junior P, Goncalves LF, de Paulo Martins V, de Melo ABF, Pitondo-Silva A, et al. Ciprofloxacin resistance in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates causing community-acquired urinary infections in Brasilia, Brazil. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017;9:61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Olorunmola FO, Kolawole DO, Lamikanra A. Antibiotic resistance and virulence properties in Escherichia coli strains from cases of urinary tract infections. Afr J Infect Dis. 2013;7:1–7. doi: 10.4314/ajid.v7i1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Piatti G, Mannini A, Balistreri M, Schito AM. Virulence factors in urinary Escherichia coli strains: phylogenetic background and quinolone and fluoroquinolone resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:480–487. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01488-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang Y, Zhao S, Han L, Guo X, Chen M, Ni Y, et al. Drug resistance and virulence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli from Shanghai, China. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2014;67:799–805. doi: 10.1038/ja.2014.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lavigne JP, Bruyere F, Bernard L, Combescure C, Ronco E, Lanotte P, et al. Resistance and virulence potential of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients hospitalized in urology departments: a French prospective multicentre study. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65:530–537. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ardebili A, Lari AR, Beheshti M, Lari ER. Association between mutations in gyrA and parC genes of Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates and ciprofloxacin resistance. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2015;18:623–626. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu BT, Liao XP, Yang SS, Wang XM, Li LL, Sun J, et al. Detection of mutations in the gyrA and parC genes in Escherichia coli isolates carrying plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes from diseased food-producing animals. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61:1591–1599. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.043307-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Minarini LA, Darini AL. Mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrA and parC in Enterobacteriaceae isolates from Brazil. Braz J Microbiol. 2012;43:1309–1314. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838220120004000010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Namboodiri SS, Opintan JA, Lijek RS, Newman MJ, Okeke IN. Quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli from Accra, Ghana. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nouri R, Ahangarzadeh Rezaee M, Hasani A, Aghazadeh M, Asgharzadeh M. The role of gyrA and parC mutations in fluoroquinolones-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Iran. Braz J Microbiol. 2016;47:925–930. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang Y-T, Lee M-F, Peng C-F. Mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions associated with ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Southern Taiwan. Biomarkers Genom Med. 2014;6:79–83. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Abbasi H, Ranjbar R. The prevalence of quinolone resistance genes of A, B, S in Escherichia coli strains isolated from three major hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Cent European J Urol. 2018;71:129–133. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2018.1539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]