Identification of hub genes and pathways in glioblastoma by bioinformatics analysis

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common type of malignant brain tumor, and is associated with poor patient prognosis. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying GBM may help to guide the identification of novel diagnoses and treatment targets. The gene expression profile of the GSE4290 GBM dataset was analyzed in order to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Enriched pathways were identified through Gene Ontology and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analyses. A protein-protein interaction network was constructed in order to identify hub genes and for module analysis. Expression and survival analyses were conducted in order to screen and validate critical genes. A total of 1,801 DEGs were recorded, including 620 upregulated and 1,181 downregulated genes. Upregulated DEGs were enriched in the terms ‘mitotic cell cycle process’, ‘mitotic cell cycle’ and ‘cell cycle process’. Downregulated genes were enriched in ‘transsynaptic signaling’, ‘anterograde transsynaptic signaling’ and ‘synaptic signaling’. A total of 15 hub genes, which displayed a high degree of connectivity, were selected. These genes included vascular endothelial growth factor A, cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), cell-division cycle protein 20 (CDC20), aurora kinase A (AURKA), and budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 (BUB1). The identified DEGs and hub genes may help guide investigations on the mechanisms underlying the development and progression of GBM. CDK1, CDC20, AURKA and BUB1, which are involved in cell cycle pathways, may be potential targets in the diagnosis and therapy of GBM.

Introduction

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most fatal primary malignant tumor of the central nervous system in adults, and accounts for 46.1% of all cases of malignant brain tumors (1). Patients who are newly diagnosed with GBM receive surgery as standard, followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy and maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy (2). Despite this aggressive treatment strategy, relapse is common and the median overall survival (OS) of patients with GBM is ~15 months (3). No other effective agents against GBM have been developed over the past decade since the approval of temozolomide for GBM treatment in 2004. Furthermore, the use of currently available agents has been hindered due to limited information on the molecular mechanisms involved in GBM development or treatment response. Therefore, it may be beneficial to elucidate the mechanisms underlying GBM and consequently develop novel therapeutic strategies.

Numerous studies have investigated the genes involved in GBM. A previous study by Yeom et al (4) indicated that the expression of the guanosine-5′-triphosphate-binding protein Ras related glycolysis inhibitor and calcium channel regulator is correlated with temozolomide resistance, and contributes to the poor survival of patients with GBM. The inhibitor of nuclear factor κ-B kinase subunit ε (IKBKE) is overexpressed in human GBM, and the inhibition of IKBKE markedly suppresses the proliferative and invasive activity of GBM cells (5). High expression levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α promote the activation of glioma cell motility by affecting molecules associated with invasion (6). Recombinant expression of HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) promotes the growth and migration of U251 and U373 cells, whereas the knockdown of HMGCR expression inhibits the growth, migration and metastasis of GBM cells (7). Lymphoid enhancer factor-1 maintains the state of proliferation and migration in GBM cells, and the GBM stem-cell-like self-renewal ability of U251 cells (8). However, the current understanding of the mechanisms underlying GBM remains limited.

In 2006, Sun et al (9) published a study in which 157 primary human glioma and 23 nontumor human brain samples underwent mRNA expression profiling, in order to verify whether overexpression of stem cell factors was associated with the poor prognosis of patients with glioma. In the current study, microarray analysis was conducted to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in GBM samples. Hub genes, in addition to significant modules and pathways, were identified using comprehensive bioinformatics methods. The present study aimed to identify the candidate genes and associated pathways of GBM, in order to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying this malignancy.

Materials and methods

Microarray data

The gene expression profiles of GSE4290 were downloaded from the public functional genomics data repository Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), which is based on the Affymetrix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, US) Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array. These gene expression files were deposited by Sun et al (9). The gene expression profiles of 77 GBM tissue samples and 23 nontumor brain samples from patients with epilepsy were retrieved from the GSE4290 dataset.

DEG screening

GEO2R is an interactive online tool based on the R programming language, which allows for comparisons between two groups of samples in a GEO series to be made (10). Adjusted P-values were utilized to decrease the false-positive rate through the default Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate method. An adjusted P<0.05 and |logFC|≥2 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Functional enrichment analysis

Gene Ontology (GO) analysis may be applied in large-scale functional studies on genomic or transcriptomic data (11). The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) is the major recognized pathway-associated database, which contains information on gene networks in various organisms (12). Previous studies have claimed that the analysis of upregulated and downregulated genes separately may allow for the identification of additional pathways, compared with combined analysis (13–15). In the present study, specific pathways involved in tumor occurrence and development were used; hence, separate analysis was performed. GO functional and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were conducted separately for upregulated and downregulated genes using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery software (DAVID version 6.8; http://david.ncifcrf.gov/) (16). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Integration of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and module analysis

The STRING (https://string-db.org/) database is an online tool for the assessment and integration of PPIs, including direct (physical) and indirect (functional) associations. STRING version 10.5 encompasses 9,643,763 proteins from 2,031 organisms (17). PPI associations amongst DEGs were searched for using the STRING database with a default required confidence of >0.4. The PPI networks of the DEGs were constructed using Cytoscape software version 3.6.0 (http://www.cytoscape.org/). The plug-in Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) was used to screen important modules with established scores of >3 and nodes of >4. GO and KEGG analyses were also conducted using the genes in these modules. In the PPI network, the number of edges involved determined the degrees of the nodes, and nodes with high degrees were determined to be hub genes. Hub genes were also mapped to STRING in order to evaluate their PPI information.

Expression and survival analyses of hub genes

Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) is an online tool used to analyze the RNA sequencing expression data of 9,736 tumors and 8,587 healthy samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases (18). GEPIA was used to perform the tumor/healthy differential expression and survival analyses of hub genes. The method of Kaplan-Meier for survival analysis was conducted in GEPIA between the high and low expression groups, with a cut-off value of 50%. The hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals and the log-rank P-value were calculated, and the results are displayed as a plot. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Identification of DEGs

The comparative GEO2R analysis of the DEGs in the GBM samples and healthy controls revealed 1,801 DEGs, including 620 upregulated and 1,181 downregulated genes.

GO function and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis

The upregulated and downregulated DEGs were imported into DAVID for GO analysis. The GO analysis results revealed that the upregulated DEGs were significantly enriched in the terms ‘mitotic cell cycle process’, ‘mitotic cell cycle’ and ‘cell cycle process’ (Table I). Downregulated genes were enriched in ‘trans-synaptic signaling’, ‘anterograde trans-synaptic signaling’ and ‘synaptic signaling’ (Table I).

Table I.

GO analysis of differentially expressed genes associated with glioblastoma.

A, upregulated genes
Term	Count	%	P-value	FDR
GO:1903047: Mitotic cell cycle process	80	17.699	9.95×10−25	1.90×10−21
GO:0000278: Mitotic cell cycle	83	18.362	2.43×10−24	4.64×10−21
GO:0022402: Cell cycle process	98	21.681	2.27×10−23	4.35×10−20
GO:0007049: Cell cycle	107	23.672	1.40×10−21	2.68×10−18
GO:0051301: Cell division	59	13.053	7.57×10−21	1.45×10−17
GO:0007067: Mitotic nuclear division	48	10.619	2.22×10−18	4.25×10−15
GO:0044770: Cell cycle phase transition	54	11.946	2.47×10−18	4.72×10−15
GO:0044772: Mitotic cell cycle phase transition	52	11.504	4.17×10−18	7.96×10−15
GO:0000819: Sister chromatid segregation	35	7.743	5.93×10−18	1.13×10−14
GO:0000280: Nuclear division	52	11.504	9.96×10−16	1.91×10−12
B, downregulated genes
Term	Count	%	P-value	FDR
GO:0099537: Trans-synaptic signaling	137	16.707	1.13×10−64	2.15×10−61
GO:0098916: Anterograde trans-synaptic signaling	137	16.707	1.13×10−64	2.15×10−61
GO:0099536: Synaptic signaling	137	16.707	1.13×10−64	2.15×10−61
GO:0007268: Chemical synaptic transmission	137	16.707	1.13×10−64	2.15×10−61
GO:0007399: Nervous system development	227	27.682	4.23×10−45	8.05×10−42
GO:0007267: Cell-cell signaling	178	21.707	9.70×10−41	1.85×10−37
GO:0050804: Modulation of synaptic transmission	66	8.048	1.69×10−31	3.21×10−28
GO:0048666: Neuron development	124	15.121	2.61×10−31	4.98×10−28
GO:0031175: Neuron projection development	111	13.536	5.22×10−30	9.94×10−27
GO:0007610: Behavior	90	10.975	9.43×10−30	1.80×10−26

FDR, false discovery rate; GO, gene ontology.

The most significantly enriched KEGG pathways of the upregulated and downregulated DEGs are displayed in Table II. The upregulated DEGs were enriched in ‘cell cycle’, ‘ECM-receptor interaction’, ‘PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, ‘p53 signaling pathway’ and ‘focal adhesion’. Downregulated DEGs were enriched in ‘morphine addiction’, ‘GABAergic synapse’, ‘retrograde endocannabinoid signaling’, ‘calcium signaling pathway’ and ‘glutamatergic synapse’.

Table II.

KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes associated with glioblastoma.

A, upregulated genes
Term	Count	%	P-value
hsa04110: Cell cycle	19	4.203	7.83×10−10
hsa04512: ECM-receptor interaction	16	3.539	1.89×10−09
hsa04151: PI3K-Akt signaling pathway	28	6.194	5.08×10−08
hsa04115: p53 signaling pathway	13	2.876	5.41×10−08
hsa04510: Focal adhesion	19	4.203	2.20×10−06
hsa05205: Proteoglycans in cancer	17	3.761	2.54×10−05
hsa04610: Complement and coagulation cascades	10	2.212	3.88×10−05
hsa05150: Staphylococcus aureus infection	9	1.991	4.15×10−05
hsa05166: HTLV-I infection	18	3.982	1.49×10−04
B, downregulated genes
Term	Count	%	P-value
hsa05032: Morphine addiction	32	3.902	5.34×10−21
hsa04727: GABAergic synapse	30	3.658	9.98×10−20
hsa04723: Retrograde endocannabinoid signaling	31	3.780	1.97×10−18
hsa04020: Calcium signaling pathway	39	4.756	1.40×10−17
hsa04724: Glutamatergic synapse	30	3.658	8.56×10−16
hsa05033: Nicotine addiction	19	2.317	3.78×10−15
hsa04080: Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction	44	5.365	1.82×10−14
hsa04024: cAMP signaling pathway	35	4.268	6.72×10−13
hsa04713: Circadian entrainment	24	2.926	2.85×10−12
hsa05031: Amphetamine addiction	19	2.317	8.49×10−11
hsa05032: Morphine addiction	32	3.902	5.34×10−21

KEGG, The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; ECM, extracellular matrix; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; HTLV, human T-cell leukemia-lymphoma virus; GABA, gamma-aminobutyric acid; cAMP, Cyclic adenosine monophosphate.

PPI network and module analyses

The PPI network constructed for the DEGs had 993 nodes and 7,810 interactions, in which two of the most significant modules were identified by MCODE (Fig. 1). Module 1 had 59 nodes and 1,576 interactions, whereas Module 2 had 32 nodes and 496 interactions. DEGs in these modules were also enriched in ‘cell cycle’ and ‘neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction’ of the KEGG pathways (Fig. 1). The top 15 hub genes were selected by the PPI network, with a degree of >81 (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Top two modules from the Protein-protein interaction network. (A) Module 1. (B) The enriched pathways of module 1. (C) Module 2. (D) The enriched pathways of module 2.

Figure 2.

Protein-protein interaction network for the top 15 hub genes. Circles represent hub genes, and connecting lines between them represent interactions.

Expression level and Kaplan-Meier plot of hub genes

The expression levels of all 15 hub genes in patients with GBM were upregulated relative to those in the healthy controls (P<0.05). High expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) was associated with poor prognosis of patients with GBMs, whereas no significant difference was observed for the remaining 14 genes (Fig. 3). The hub genes cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), cell-division cycle protein 20 (CDC20), aurora kinase A (AURKA), and budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 (BUB1) were also enriched in the top three modules.

Figure 3.

Expression and survival analysis of VEGFA. (A) Expression levels of VEGFA in GBMs compared with healthy controls. *P<0.05. (B) Survival analysis of high and low VEGFA expression levels in patients with GBM. VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A; GBM, glioblastoma; HR, hazard ratio; TPM, transcripts per million.

Discussion

GBM is the most common primary malignant tumor of the brain. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the progression of GBM remains unclear. In the present study, DEGs between GBM and healthy samples were identified, and a series of bioinformatics analytical methods applied in order to determine the key genes and pathways associated with GBM. A total of 1,801 DEGs were identified. These DEGs included 620 upregulated and 1,181 downregulated genes. Subjecting the DEGs to bioinformatics analysis, including GO enrichment, KEGG pathway, PPI network and survival analyses, revealed that GBM-associated genes and pathways may serve an important role in the initiation and progression of cancer.

GO term enrichment analysis indicated that the upregulated DEGs were significantly enriched in the terms ‘mitotic cell cycle process’, ‘mitotic cell cycle’ and ‘cell cycle process’. Deregulation of the cell cycle serves a critical role in the proliferation of malignant glioma cells. Genetic analyses of primary human brain tumors detected common mutations in genes encoding proteins critical for cell cycle regulation. These genes include retinoblastoma protein, INK4A and CDK4 (19–22). The downregulated DEGs were enriched in pathways involved in trans-synaptic signaling and synaptic signaling. Yu et al (23) reported that metabotropic glutamate receptors, which are involved in synaptic signaling, are also involved in the transformation and maintenance of various cancer types, including glioma, melanoma skin cancer, breast cancer and prostate cancer. The WW and C2 domain-containing protein (WWC) family serves important roles in regulating cell proliferation, cell migration and synaptic signaling. The overexpression of WWC3 inhibits glioma cell proliferation, migration and invasion (24).

KEGG pathway analysis indicated that the functions of the upregulated genes were enriched in ‘cell cycle’, ‘ECM-receptor interaction’, ‘PI3K-Akt signaling pathway’, ‘p53 signaling pathway’ and ‘focal adhesion’. Extracellular matrix (ECM) rigidity may mediate the invasion of GBM multiforme cells through actomyosin contractility (25,26). The PI3K-Akt signaling pathway serves an important role in glioma formation, through the suppression of cell death (27,28). p53 is a tumor suppressor factor which initiates DNA repair, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, and responds to numerous types of cancer therapy (29,30). Downregulated DEGs were enriched in ‘morphine addiction’, ‘GABAergic synapse’, ‘retrograde endocannabinoid signaling’, ‘calcium signaling pathway’ and ‘glutamatergic synapse’. Calcium signaling has notable functions in numerous signaling processes involved in the proliferation and motility of GBM cells (31).

Analysis of the top two modules from the PPI network indicated that GBM was associated with the cell cycle and neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction. Pal et al (32) recently demonstrated that patients who have GBM in combination with a defective neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway have a poor prognosis (P<0.0001). Therefore, monitoring these signaling pathways may help predict tumor occurrence and progression. The top 15 hub genes were identified from the network. Although these hub genes were all upregulated in GBM, VEGFA is the only gene which was significantly associated with the poor prognosis of patients with GBMs. GBMs are highly vascularized tumors, and VEGFA is highly expressed in the endothelial cells of blood vessels (33). Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against VEGFA, improves the progression-free survival of patients with GBM, however it does not prolong the OS of patients compared with the historical control (34). Antiangiogenic treatment does not improve the OS of patients with GBM compared with standard cytotoxic treatment, thus, an in-depth understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying all of the hub genes of GBM, including CDK1, CDC20, AURKA, and BUB1, is required. CDK1, which is enriched in the module of Cluster 1, serves vital roles in regulating oncogenesis and cell cycle progression (35,36). The overexpression of CDC20 is associated with temozolomide resistance in glioma cells (37). AURKA regulates the self-renewal and tumorigenicity of glioma-initiating cells through the stabilization of β-catenin (38).

Similar bioinformatics studies also used the expression profile of GSE4290 for their analysis. However, previous studies applied alternative bioinformatics methods to those used in the present study, and thus obtained different results. For example, two separate studies conducted bioinformatics analysis in accordance with pathological grading (e.g. astrocytoma, GBM and oligodendroglioma). One study reported that long-term potentiation and ECM-receptor interaction may have important roles in the occurrence and development of glioma, whereas the other study focused on the involvement of the Wnt and p53 signaling pathways in glioma (39,40). Li et al (41) compared 81 GBM samples with 23 controls from GSE4290 and identified significant MAPK and cell cycle signaling pathways. Furthermore, they reported that a number of genes, including neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog, CDK2, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2, and cyclin D1, were associated with GBM (41). Wei et al (42) used a method similar to that used in the present study, in order to analyze 23 nontumor and 77 GBM (Grade 4) tumor samples of GSE4290. Through GO analysis, it was discovered that DEGs were enriched in ‘synaptic transmission’, ‘regulation of vesicle-mediated transport’ and ‘ion-gated channel activity’. KEGG analysis results indicated that DEGs were enriched in ‘neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction’, ‘calcium signaling pathway’, ‘p53 signaling pathway’ and ‘cell cycle’. The study also identified vital transcription factors, including tumor protein p53, specificity protein 1, JUN proto-oncogene AP-1 transcription factor subunit, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, and transcription factor PU.1 (42). In the present study, only GBM samples were included, and not astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma. Expression and survival analyses were also conducted using the novel GEPIA tool and the TCGA and GTEx databases. Therefore, the results of the present study expand on the current knowledge and understanding of the molecular mechanisms of GBM.

In conclusion, bioinformatics analysis identified hub genes and pathways that may have central roles in the occurrence, development and prognosis of GBM. VEGFA, CDK1, CDC20, AURKA and BUB1, the hub genes of GBM, may serve important roles in the diagnosis and treatment of GBM.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the GEO repository (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).

Author's contributions

WL was in charge of study design. SY and KG were in charge of data analysis and article publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.