Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate whether rhamnetin induced apoptosis in human breast cancer cells and the underlying molecular mechanism of this anti cancer effect. The treatment of MCF-7 cells with rhamnetin was able to significantly inhibit cell proliferation and induce caspase-3/9 activity in a dose- and time-dependent manner, compared with untreated cells. In addition, treatment with rhamnetin was able to significantly promote the expression of p53 protein and microRNA (miR-)34a compared with untreated cells. The treatment with rhamnetin also suppressed the expression of Notch1 protein in MCF-7 cells compared with untreated cells. Subsequently, miR-24a expression was promoted in rhamnetin-treated MCF-7 cells using a miR-34a plasmid. The overexpression of miR-34a was able to significantly inhibit cell viability and induce caspase-3/9 activity in MCF-7 cells following treatment with rhamnetin. Furthermore, the overexpression of miR-34a was able to significantly promote the expression of p53 protein and miR-34a, and suppress the expression of Notch1 protein in rhamnetin-treated MCF-7 cells. Therefore, the results of the present study demonstrated that rhamnetin induced apoptosis in human breast cancer cells via the miR-34a/Notch-1 signaling pathway.
Keywords: rhamnetin, breast cancer, microRNA 34a, Notch-1
Introduction
Breast cancer is the most common type of malignancy in women, of which the incidence and mortality rates rank first in cancer cases in females worldwide (1). In spite of early treatment, ~30% patients with breast cancer will experience relapse and metastasis (1). For patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, the conventional treatment typically controls the development of the disease effectively at first; however, over time, the majority of patients will deteriorate (2). To decrease mortality rates and develop novel therapeutic strategies, the molecular biological characteristics of breast cancer cells require further investigation.
microRNA (miRNA/miR), a small non-coding RNA molecule between 21 and 23 nucleotides in length, serves important regulatory functions in a number of types of biological processes, including inflammation, apoptosis and autophagy (3). miRNAs may inhibit the expression of proteins or induce mRNA degradation by complementary base pairing with the mRNA of target genes at specific binding sites, so as to participate in gene regulation (4). miRNAs are able to regulate cancer-associated genes, serving possibly as a cancer suppressor gene (5). In various tumor tissues, including breast, colon and liver cancer tissues, decreased expression of miRNA shas been observed (6); therefore, regulating the levels of miRNA in cancer cells, particularly in cancer stem cells, may be used to identify a novel treatment strategy.
The miR-34 family includes miR-34a, −34b and −34c (7,8). Previous studies have demonstrated that the cancer suppressor gene p53 directly induced the expression of miR-34, which promoted apoptosis and induced cell cycle arrest (7,8). miR-34a serves an important function in the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells (9,10). Previous studies have revealed that miR-34a may inhibit proliferation of pancreatic and stomach cancer stem cells (9,10).
The involvement of the Notch1 signaling pathway in tumor chemoresistance has been gaining increasing attention. A previous study demonstrated that the inhibition of Notch1 in prostate cancer may increase the sensitivity of cells to docetaxel. Furthermore, oxaliplatin may induce the Notch1 signaling pathway in colon cancer (11). In addition, a significantly increased expression of Notch1 was observed in the patients with cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumors (12). Silencing Notch1 significantly increased the toxic effect of cisplatin on tumor cells, such as breast cancer, lung cancer or liver cancer (12).
The Notch signaling pathway has been conserved throughout evolution and serves an important function in embryonic development, organ maturation and tumorigenesis (13). Notch1 is a Notch receptor that is associated with the occurrence, metastasis and drug resistance of breast cancer (13). A previous study revealed that Notch1 serves an important function in maintaining self-renewal and regulating the differentiation of breast cancer stem cells (13). Notch1 a target gene of miR-34a; therefore, the miR-34a/Notch1 signaling pathway may serve functions in the cell proliferation of breast cancer cells and stem cells (14,15).
Isorhmnetin and glycosides are present in a variety of plants, including sea buckthorn, Salix matsudana, orientin, Gynostemma yixingense, camel thorn and wolfberry (16). Sea buckthorn is rich in rhamnetin, which is one of the main monomers in sea buckthorn, and is typically used as a standard for the determination of flavonoid content (17). Previous studies have identified that rhamnetin exhibited multiple cardiovascular prevents myocardial ischemia and ischemia, angina, arrhythmia, oxygen free radicals and serum cholesterol (18,19). However, to the best of our knowledge, the tumor inhibitory effect of rhamnetin as a monomer remains unknown. Rhamnetin exhibits strong anti-tumor effects (20). The present study aimed to investigate whether rhamnetin induced apoptosis in human breast cancer cells and the underlying molecular mechanism of this anticancer effect.
Materials and methods
Cells and materials
MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines were obtained from the School of Medicine, Nankai University (Tianjin, China) and Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
MTT proliferation assay
The MCF-7 cells cultured with DMEM were subcultured into 96-well culture microplates (1×104 cells/well) at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After 24 h incubation, the medium was discarded and replaced with 100 µl fresh DMEM containing 0, 5, 10, 15, 25 µM rhamnetin and incubated for 24, 48 and 72 h at 37°C. Subsequently, 20 µl MTT test solution was added to each well. After 4 h incubation at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2, the medium was discarded and 150 µl dimethyl sulfoxide was added to each well. After 20 min incubation in an incubator at 37°C, absorbance was determined at 490 nm on an ELISA reader (Molecular Devices, LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
Caspase-3/9 activity
The cultured MCF-7 cells with DMEM were subcultured into 6-well culture microplates (1×106 cells/well) at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After 24 h incubation, the medium was discarded and replaced with 100 µl fresh DMEM with 0, 5, 10, 15 and 25 µM rhamnetin for 48 h at 37°C. MCF-7 cells were lysed using the radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China) for 30 min at 4°C. Total protein concentration was quantitated using the BCA method (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), and 20 µg total protein was incubated with Ac-DEVD-pNA (Caspase-3; C1116, Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) or Ac-LEHD-pNA (Caspase-9; C1158, Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). After 2 h incubation at 37°C, the absorbance was determined at 405 nm on an ELISA reader (Molecular Devices, LLC).
Western blot analysis
The cultured MCF-7 cells with DMEM were subcultured into 6-well culture microplates (1×106 cells/well) at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After 24 h incubation, the medium was discarded and replaced with 100 µl fresh DMEM with 0, 5, 10, 15 and 25 µM rhamnetin for 48 h at 37°C. MCF-7 cells were lysed using with RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 30 min at 4°C. Total protein concentration was quantified using the BCA method (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Subsequently, 50 µg total protein concentration was separated using SDS-PAGE (8–12% gels) and electro transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membranes blocked with 5% non-fat milk in TBST for 1 h at 37°C and immunoblotted with primary antibodies against p53 (sc-71817, dilution, 1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA), Notch-1 (sc-71719, dilution, 1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and GAPDH (sc-51631, dilution, 1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (sc-2004, dilution, 1:5,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for 1 h at 37°C following washing for 15 min using TBSTween-20. The membranes were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA).
Reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-qPCR)
TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to isolate total RNA from MCF-7 cells. A total of 2 µg RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the Takara RNA PCR set (Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan) at 37°C for 30 min and 85°C for 1 min according to the manufacturer's protocol. qPCR was performed using the StepOne and StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The primer sequences for miR-34a were as follows: Forward, 5′-TGGCAGTGTCTTAGCTGGTTGT-3′; and reverse, 5′-GGCAGTATACTTGCTGATTGCTT-3′. The primer sequences for U6 were as follows: Forward, 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′; and reverse, 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′. PCR was performed for 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec and 60°C for 30 sec. The expression relative was determined using the 2−ΔΔCq method relative to U6 (21).
Plasmid construction and transfection
miR-34a mimics (5′-UGGCAGUGUCUUAGCUGGUUGU-3′) and negative control miRNA mimic (5′-CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC-3′) were purchased from Shanghai GeneChem Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). A total of 100 ng of miR-34a mimics and the negative control miRNA mimic were used to transfect MCF-7 cells using Lipofectamine® 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Following 4 h of transfection, old DMEM was substituted with new DMEM without fetal bovine serum and was added into the cell.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance was used for evaluating the statistical significance between groups followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Rhamnetin suppresses the proliferation of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells
The chemical structure of rhamnetin is presented in Fig. 1. First, the anti-cancer effects of rhamnetin on the cell viability of MCF-7 cells were examined. As presented in Fig. 2, rhamnetin suppressed the cell viability of human breast cancer cells MCF-7 in a time- and dose-dependent manner. When MCF-7 cells were treated with various 10–25 µM rhamnetin for 72 h, or 15–25 µM rhamnetin for 48 h, the proliferation of MCF-7 cells was significantly decreased compared with the untreated cells. Therefore, these findings indicated that treatment with rhamnetin was able to suppress the proliferation of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells.
Rhamnetin induces caspase-3/9 activity in MCF-7 cells
Subsequently, the effect of rhamnetin on caspase-3/9 activity in MCF-7 cells was examined using various concentrations of rhamnetin (0, 15, 20 and 25 µM) ELISA. The results of the present study indicated that 20 and 25 µM rhamnetin were able to significantly increase the caspase-3/9 activity in MCF-7 cells in a dose-dependent manner compared with the untreated cells (Fig. 3).
Rhamnetin induces p53 protein expression in MCF-7 cells
To investigate whether apoptosis is promoted following rhamnetin treatment in MCF-7 cells, p53 protein expression was examined using western blot analysis. As presented in Fig. 4, p53 expression was significantly increased in MCF-7 cells compared with the untreated cells following the treatment of MCF-7 cells with 20 and 25 µM rhamnetin for 48 h.
Rhamnetin suppresses Notch-1 protein expression in MCF-7 cells
The anti-effect mechanism of rhamnetin on Notch-1 expression in MCF-7 cells was evaluated; 20 and 25 µM rhamnetin were able to significantly decrease Notch-1 expression in MCF-7 cells compared with the untreated cells (Fig. 4).
Rhamnetin promotes miR-34a expression in MCF-7 cells
To evaluate the anti-effect mechanism of rhamnetin in MCF-7 cells, miR-34a expression was determined using RT-qPCR. miR-34a expression in MCF-7 cells was significantly increased following treatment with 20 and 25 µM rhamnetin for 48 h compared with the untreated cells (Fig. 5).
Overexpression of miR-34a inhibits the proliferation of MCF-7 cells following treatment with rhamnetin
According to the previous results in the present study, it was hypothesized that miR-34a may mediate the anti-cancer effects of rhamnetin in MCF-7 cells. As presented in Fig. 6A, transfection with miR-34a mimics significantly increased miR-34a expression in MCF-7 cells that were treated with rhamnetin (25 µM) compared with MCF-7 cells that were treated with 25 µM rhamnetin alone. Subsequently, the overexpression of miR-34a significantly inhibited the cell viability of MCF-7 cells compared with the 25-µM rhamnetin treatment group (Fig. 6B).
Overexpression of miR-34a increases caspase-3/9 activity in MCF-7 cells following treatment with rhamnetin
The effect of rhamnetin on the activity of caspase-3/9 in MCF-7 cells that were treated by rhamnetin was subsequently examined. As presented in Fig. 7, the overexpression of miR-34a was able to significantly increase caspase-3/9 activity in MCF-7 cells that were treated with 25 µM rhamnetin, compared with treatment with 25 µM rhamnetin alone.
p53 protein expression increases following overexpression of miR-34a and rhamnetin treatment
To validate the association between miR-34a and p53, MCF-7 cells were treated with rhamnetin and transfected with miR-34a mimic. Subsequently, p53 protein expression was determined using western blot analysis. The induction of p53 protein expression was significantly increased following overexpression of miR-34a in rhamnetin-treated MCF-7 cells compared with cells that were treated with 25-µM rhamnetin alone (Fig. 8).
Overexpression of miR-34a and rhamnetin treatment decreases Notch-1 expression
To investigate the association between miR-34a and Notch-1 following the overexpression of miR-34a in MCF-7 cells, Notch-1 protein expression was determined using western blot analysis in MCF-7 cells. The results from the western blot analysis revealed that Notch-1 expression was significantly suppressed by the overexpression of miR-34a in MCF-7 cells that were treated with rhamnetin compared with MCF-7 cells that were treated with 25-µM rhamnetin alone (Fig. 8).
Discussion
Breast cancer is a life-threatening disease for women worldwide, and the advancements in early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer has markedly reduced mortality rates (22). However, the recurrence, metastasis and resistance to chemotherapy of breast cancer present challenges for treatment (23). Statistics reveal that breast cancer accounts for ~15% of all cancer-associated mortalities worldwide, and the number of patients with breast cancer is increasing by >1.3 million/year (22,24). Therefore, studies that focus on the search for novel and effective diagnostic and treatment methods remain prevalent in breast cancer research. Pieme et al (25) demonstrated that rhamnetin induced mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis and G0/G1 phase arrest in human leukemia HL-60 cells. In the present study, it was revealed that treatment with rhamnetin was able to suppress the cell viability of MCF-7 cells and induce caspase-3/9 activity, suggesting that rhamnetin serves an anti-cancer function.
miR-34a is capable of regulating proliferation, apoptosis, invasion and migration of tumor cells by targeting multiple genes, which indicates that it may be more beneficial in gene therapy compared with short-interfering RNA (8). At present, a number of studies have focused on increasing the understanding of the tumor suppressor effects of miR-34a with the aim of improving prognosis for patients (26). It has been identified that nanoparticles may be used to deliver miRNA or the miRNA mimetic into the body effectively. The delivery of the miR-34a mimetic by nanoparticles using intravenous or intratumoral injection method was able to significantly inhibit tumor growth, without serious toxicities or adverse immune reactions, in various cancer types, including breast, prostate, pancreatic cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (10,26).
Kang et al (27) reported that rhamnetin and cirsiliol induce radiosensitization by miR-34a-mediated of p53 and Notch-1. The present study demonstrated that treatment with rhamnetin was able to significantly induce miR-34a expression in MCF-7 cells. Therefore, the upregulation of miR-34a may represent a novel mechanism for the anti-cancer effect of rhamnetin in human breast cancer.
As a downstream target of p53, miR-34a serves an important function in regulating the p53 network. Upregulating miR-34a induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, and p53 may enhance this affect by a positive feedback loop that involves the p53-miR-34a-sirtuin 1 signaling pathway (28). In addition, miR-34a is subject to regulation by p53-dependent and p53-independent pathways (29,30). The aforementioned findings suggest that rhamnetin is able to induce p53 protein expression in MCF-7 cells. Therefore, it has been suggested that p53-associated apoptotic factors are involved in mediating the apoptotic effect of rhamnetin in MCF-7 cells (29,30).
The Notch pathway is an evolutionarily conservative signaling pathway and is associated with cell proliferation, apoptosis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells (31). The Notch signaling pathway is activated by the combination of a ligand and a receptor between adjacent cells (32). Following receptor and ligand binding, Notch intracellular domain (NICD) is released by enzyme action and NICD enters the nucleus to activate the transcription of downstream target genes (33). The Notch signaling pathway primarily exhibits tumor-promoting effects, but it has been suggested that its function varies in different types of tumor (34).
The Notch1 pathway is a highly conservative signaling pathway, which is widely expressed in vertebrates and invertebrates, and which serves an important function in embryonic development, organ maturation and tumor development process (35). In mammals, the Notch signaling pathway molecules includes four transmembrane receptors (Notch1-4) and five ligands (delta-like 1, 3 and 4, and jagged-1 and 2). A previous study demonstrated that the activated forms of continuous expression of Notch1 or Notch4 induced the formation of spontaneous mammary tumors in mice, which suggested that activation of the Notch signaling pathway is associated with the occurrence of breast cancer (36). Bioinformatics analysis revealed that Notch1 is a target gene of miR-34a, suggesting that Notch1 may serve a function in the regulation of miR-34a in breast cancer (13). The results of the present study identified that the overexpression of miR-34a was able to significantly promote the expression of p53 protein and suppress the expression of Notch1 protein in MCF-7 cells, following treatment with 25 µM rhamnetin compared with the cells that were treated with 25 µM alone. Jia et al (20) demonstrated that rhamnetin induced sensitization via miR-34a and the Notch-1 signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.
To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to demonstrate that treatment with rhamnetin was able to significantly inhibit cell proliferation, induce caspase-3/9 activity, promote the expression of p53 protein and miR-34a, and suppress the Notch1 expression in MCF-7 cells. Therefore, it was revealed that rhamnetin suppresses the growth of human breast cancer cells and may be used for clinical applications.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
The analyzed data sets generated during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
LaL designed the experiments; YW, ZP, BW, ZY, ZJ, LiL, CW and HT performed the experiments; LaL and YW analyzed the data and LaL wrote the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Tryfonidis K, Basaran G, Bogaerts J, Debled M, Dirix L, Thery JC, Tjan-Heijnen VC, Van den Weyngaert D, Cufer T, Piccart M, et al. A European organisation for research and treatment of cancer randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase II trial of anastrozole in combination with gefitinib or placebo in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer ( NCT00066378) Eur J Cancer. 2016;53:144–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dieras V, Wildiers H, Jassem J, Dirix LY, Guastalla JP, Bono P, Hurvitz SA, Gonçalves A, Romieu G, Limentani SA, et al. Trebananib (AMG 386) plus weekly paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab as first-line therapy for HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: A phase 2 randomized study. Breast. 2015;24:182–190. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yu J, Wang JG, Zhang L, Yang HP, Wang L, Ding D, Chen Q, Yang WL, Ren KH, Zhou DM, et al. MicroRNA-320a inhibits breast cancer metastasis by targeting metadherin. Oncotarget. 2016;7:38612–38625. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mathe A, Scott RJ, Avery-Kiejda KA. MiRNAs and other epigenetic changes as biomarkers in triple negative breast cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:28347–28376. doi: 10.3390/ijms161226090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.He BS, Pan YQ, Lin K, Ying HQ, Wang F, Deng QW, Sun HL, Gao TY, Wang SK. Evaluation the susceptibility of five polymorphisms in microRNA-binding sites to female breast cancer risk in Chinese population. Gene. 2015;573:160–165. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.07.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bertoli G, Cava C, Castiglioni I. MicroRNAs: New biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, therapy prediction and therapeutic tools for breast cancer. Theranostics. 2015;5:1122–1143. doi: 10.7150/thno.11543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Adams BD, Parsons C, Slack FJ. The tumor-suppressive and potential therapeutic functions of miR-34a in epithelial carcinomas. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2016;20:737–753. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2016.1114102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Javeri A, Ghaffarpour M, Taha MF, Houshmand M. Downregulation of miR-34a in breast tumors is not associated with either p53 mutations or promoter hypermethylation while it correlates with metastasis. Med Oncol. 2013;30:413. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0413-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kato M, Paranjape T, Muller RU, Nallur S, Gillespie E, Keane K, Esquela-Kerscher A, Weidhaas JB, Slack FJ. The mir-34 microRNA is required for the DNA damage response in vivo in C. Elegans and in vitro in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2009;28:2419–2424. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vogt M, Munding J, Gruner M, Liffers ST, Verdoodt B, Hauk J, Steinstraesser L, Tannapfel A, Hermeking H. Frequent concomitant inactivation of miR-34a and miR-34b/c by CpG methylation in colorectal, pancreatic, mammary, ovarian, urothelial, and renal cell carcinomas and soft tissue sarcomas. Virchows Arch. 2011;458:313–322. doi: 10.1007/s00428-010-1030-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sun H, Li K, Shen S. A study of the role of Notch1 and JAG1 gene methylation in development of breast cancer. Med Oncol. 2016;33:35. doi: 10.1007/s12032-016-0750-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cao YW, Wan GX, Sun JP, Cui XB, Hu JM, Liang WH, Zheng YQ, Li WQ, Li F. Implications of the Notch1-Snail/Slug-epithelial to mesenchymal transition axis for lymph node metastasis in infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015;31:70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li XJ, Ji MH, Zhong SL, Zh QB, Xu JJ, Zhao JH, Tang JH. MicroRNA-34a modulates chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells to adriamycin by targeting Notch1. Arch Med Res. 2012;43:514–521. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2012.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bae Y, Yang T, Zeng HC, Campeau PM, Chen Y, Bertin T, Dawson BC, Munivez E, Tao J, Lee BH. miRNA-34c regulates Notch signaling during bone development. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:2991–3000. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bernardo BC, Gao XM, Winbanks CE, Boey EJ, Tham YK, Kiriazis H, Gregorevic P, Obad S, Kauppinen S, Du XJ, et al. Therapeutic inhibition of the miR-34 family attenuates pathological cardiac remodeling and improves heart function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:17615–17620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206432109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jnawali HN, Lee E, Jeong KW, Shin A, Heo YS, Kim Y. Anti-inflammatory activity of rhamnetin and a model of its binding to c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase 1 and p38 MAPK. J Nat Prod. 2014;77:258–263. doi: 10.1021/np400803n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ji SY, Choi KM, Lee YS, Yu JY, Shin DM, Lee S, Yoo KS, Lee YM, Yun YP, Yoo HS. Rhamnetin-induced suppression of clonal expansion during early stage of adipogenesis. Arch Pharm Res. 2012;35:1083–1089. doi: 10.1007/s12272-012-0616-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee KP, Kim JE, Park WH. Cytoprotective effect of rhamnetin on miconazole-induced H9c2 cell damage. Nutr Res Pract. 2015;9:586–591. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2015.9.6.586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mattarei A, Biasutto L, Rastrelli F, Garbisa S, Marotta E, Zoratti M, Paradisi C. Regioselective O-derivatization of quercetin via ester intermediates. An improved synthesis of rhamnetin and development of a new mitochondriotropic derivative. Molecules. 2010;15:4722–4736. doi: 10.3390/molecules15074722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jia H, Yang Q, Wang T, Cao Y, Jiang QY, Ma HD, Sun HW, Hou MX, Yang YP, Feng F. Rhamnetin induces sensitization of hepatocellular carcinoma cells to a small molecular kinase inhibitor or chemotherapeutic agents. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1860:1417–1430. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rajan SS, Sharma SC, Kumar N, Kumar R, Singh G, Singh R, Tomar P. Clinical and cosmetic results of breast boost radiotherapy in early breast cancer: A randomized study between electron and photon. J Cancer Res Ther. 2014;10:889–895. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.138228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhao S, Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Kuller LH, Manson JE, Gass M, Patterson R, Rohan TE, Lane DS, Beresford SA, et al. Sex hormone associations with breast cancer risk and the mediation of randomized trial postmenopausal hormone therapy effects. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:R30. doi: 10.1186/bcr3632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mayer IA, Abramson VG, Isakoff SJ, Forero A, Balko JM, Kuba MG, Sanders ME, Yap JT, Van den Abbeele AD, Li Y, et al. Stand up to cancer phase Ib study of pan-phosphoinositide-3-kinase inhibitor buparlisib with letrozole in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1202–1209. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.0518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pieme CA, Santosh GK, Tekwu EM, Askun T, Aydeniz H, Ngogang JY, Bhushan S, Saxena AK. Fruits and barks extracts of Zanthozyllum heitzii a spice from Cameroon induce mitochondrial dependent apoptosis and G0/G1 phase arrest in human leukemia HL-60 cells. Biol Res. 2014;47:54. doi: 10.1186/0717-6287-47-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yang S, Li Y, Gao J, Zhan T, Li S, Luo A, Chen H, Ding F, Wang X, Liu Z. MicroRNA-34 suppresses breast cancer invasion and metastasis by directly targeting Fra-1. Oncogene. 2013;32:4294–4303. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kang J, Kim E, Kim W, Seong KM, Youn H, Kim JW, Kim J, Youn B. Rhamnetin and cirsiliol induce radiosensitization and inhibition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by miR-34a-mediated suppression of Notch-1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:27343–27357. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.490482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ng WL, Chen G, Wang M, Wang H, Story M, Shay JW, Zhang X, Wang J, Amin AR, Hu B, et al. OCT4 as a target of miR-34a stimulates p63 but inhibits p53 to promote human cell transformation. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1024. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 29.Huang SM, Tsai CF, Chen DR, Wang MY, Yeh WL. p53 is a key regulator for osthole-triggered cancer pathogenesis. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:175247. doi: 10.1155/2014/175247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hargraves KG, He L, Firestone GL. Phytochemical regulation of the tumor suppressive microRNA, miR-34a, by p53-dependent and independent responses in human breast cancer cells. Mol Carcinog. 2016;55:486–498. doi: 10.1002/mc.22296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Peng D, Tanikawa T, Li W, Zhao L, Vatan L, Szeliga W, Wan S, Wei S, Wang Y, Liu Y, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells endow stem-like qualities to breast cancer cells through IL6/STAT3 and NO/NOTCH Cross-talk Signaling. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3156–3165. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cui J, Li P, Liu X, Hu H, Wei W. Abnormal expression of the Notch and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways in stem-like ALDHCD44 cells correlates highly with Ki-67 expression in breast cancer. Oncol Lett. 2015;9:1600–1606. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.2942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Portanova P, Notaro A, Pellerito O, Sabella S, Giuliano M, Calvaruso G. Notch inhibition restores TRAIL-mediated apoptosis via AP1-dependent upregulation of DR4 and DR5 TRAIL receptors in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2013;43:121–130. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.1945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pamarthy S, Jaiswal MK, Kulshreshtha A, Katara GK, Gilman-Sachs A, Beaman KD. The Vacuolar ATPase a2-subunit regulates Notch signaling in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6:34206–34220. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shao S, Zhao X, Zhang X, Luo M, Zuo X, Huang S, Wang Y, Gu S, Zhao X. Notch1 signaling regulates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasion of breast cancer in a Slug-dependent manner. Mol Cancer. 2015;14:28. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0295-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang H, Li Y, Li T, Xu M, Chen Y, Wu C, Dang X, Liu Y. Multifunctional core/shell nanoparticles cross-linked polyetherimide-folic acid as efficient Notch-1 siRNA carrier for targeted killing of breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7072. doi: 10.1038/srep07072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The analyzed data sets generated during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.