Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Vasc Res. 2018 May 18;55(3):125–135. doi: 10.1159/000489102

A Novel Ex Vivo Mouse Mesometrium Culture Model for Investigating Angiogenesis in Microvascular Networks

Ariana D Suarez-Martinez a,b, Susanne Bierschenk c, Katie Huang d, Dana Kaplan b, Carolyn L Bayer b, Stryder M Meadows d, Markus Sperandio c, Walter L Murfee a,b
PMCID: PMC6314041  NIHMSID: NIHMS959330  PMID: 29779031

Abstract

Background:

Development of models that incorporate intact microvascular networks enables the investigation of multicellular dynamics during angiogenesis. Our laboratory introduced the rat mesentery culture model as such tool, which would be enhanced with mouse tissue. Since mouse mesentery is avascular, an alternative is mouse mesometrium, connective tissue of uterine horns. The study’s objective was to demonstrate that mouse mesometrium contains microvascular networks that can be cultured to investigate multicellular dynamics during angiogenesis.

Methods:

Harvested mesometrium tissues from C57Bl/6 female mice were cultured in media with serum for up to 7 days. PECAM, NG2, αSMA, and LYVE-1 labeling identified endothelial cells, pericytes, smooth muscle cells, and lymphatic endothelial cells, respectively.

Results:

These cells comprised microvascular networks with arterioles, venules and capillaries. Compared to day 0, capillary sprouts per vascular length was increased by 3 and 5 days in culture (Day 0: 0.08±0.01, Day 3: 3.19±0.78, Day 5: 2.49±0.05 sprouts/mm; p<0.05). Time-lapse imaging of cultured tissues from FlkEGFP mice showcases use of the model for lineage studies. The impact is supported by the identification of endothelial cell jumping from one sprout to another.

Conclusion:

These results introduce a novel culture model for investigating multicellular dynamics during angiogenesis in real-ex vivo microvascular networks.

Keywords: Microcirculation, Angiogenesis, Microvascular Network, Capillary Sprouting, Endothelial Cell, Pericyte

INTRODUCTION

As microvascular remodeling is a common denominator for multiple pathologies such as tumor growth, myocardial ischemia, and diabetes [1], a need exists to understand the multicellular dynamics involved in angiogenesis, defined as the growth of new blood vessels from preexisting ones. This drive to understand angiogenesis has inspired the emergence and use of tissue engineered, biomimetic ex vivo models, which enables views not possible in vivo for basic science discovery. However, the challenge to recapitulate the complexity of angiogenesis in intact microvascular networks in a dish highlights a gap between in vitro and in vivo scenarios. In a real-tissue, capillary sprouting off existing vessels incorporates the dynamics of endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, pericytes, and interstitial cells [2]. This complexity is further increased with interactions between the blood microvascular system and lymphatic or neural system. Therefore, a critical question that addresses the biomimetic model challenge is: how can we incorporate the multicellular/system complexity of angiogenesis in microvascular networks?

Common models such as two-dimensional [3], three-dimensional [4], and microfluidic [5] approaches have built up complexity and proven extremely useful. However, each model is limited by the fact that they do not look and function like real networks. As an alternative to the bottom-up approaches, our laboratory recently introduced the rat mesentery culture model, in which the microvascular complexity of real tissues is maintained in culture. Advantages of the rat mesentery culture model are: 1) multiple cell types (i.e. endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, pericytes, and macrophages) remain viable along the hierarchy of microvascular networks [68], 2) angiogenesis occurs preferentially along venules and capillaries versus arterioles similar to in vivo [6], 3) smooth muscle cells and pericytes remain functional [6,9], and 4) the ability to simultaneously capture time-lapse images of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis [7,10]. Despite these characteristics, the applicability of this model would be enhanced with the use of transgenic mouse tissue, yet unfortunately, the same connective tissue in mouse is avascular [11].

A potential analog to the rat mesentery is the mouse mesometrium, which is the thin connective tissue of the uterine horns, yet it is unknown whether it contains microvasculature. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the mouse mesometrium indeed contains intact microvascular networks and that angiogenesis can be induced in culture. Our results 1) confirmed that mouse mesometrium has intact microvascular networks with multiple cell types, 2) demonstrated the ability to induce angiogenesis in culture, and 3) allowed for time-lapse lineage studies by using FlkEGFP mice. Our findings introduce the mouse mesometrium culture model as a novel tool for the real-time ex vivo investigation of angiogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mouse Mesometrium Tissue Harvesting and Culture Model

All animal experiments were approved by Tulane University’s Institutional Animal and Care Use Committee. Adult, female C57BL/6 mice were euthanized by asphyxiation in a CO2 chamber followed by cervical dislocation. The abdominal fur was shaved before sterilizing the abdomen with 70% isopropyl alcohol followed by 3 wipes with iodine. The abdominal skin and muscles were cut off with sterile scissors to expose the organs. Two forceps were utilized to move away all organs until the uterine horns were exposed. Each uterine horn was stretched to more clearly expose the mesometrium, the connective tissue attaching the uterine horns to the back wall, and then pinned down to facilitate harvesting. Sterile saline warmed to 37°C was dripped on tissue to prevent dehydration as needed. Using aseptic techniques, the mesometrium tissues were harvested with forceps and microscissors by pinching a side of the mesometrium and cutting around the uterine horn (Fig. 1A). Once removed, the tissues were immediately rinsed in sterile Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS), and then transferred to sterile minimum essential media containing Earle’s Salts (MEM; Gibco) and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin (PenStrep; Gibco) warmed to 37°C. The mesometrium tissues were transferred to a biosafety cabinet after harvesting. Using a 6-well culture plate, 4 mL of culture media was transferred into each well where a single tissue was placed. Cultured media was comprised of sterile MEM and 1% PenStrep. Tissues were then immediately placed inside an incubator set at standard cell culture conditions (5% CO2, 37°C) for up to 7 days, where media was changed every 24 hours.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Mouse mesometrium culture model. (A) Image showing a mouse with the mesometrium tissue exposed (dashed oval) and (B) a schematic demonstrating the harvested tissue for time-lapse imaging during culture.

Immunohistochemistry

Tissues were first spread on a microscope slide and then fixed in methanol at −20°C for 30 min before labeling. The following antibodies were used to label the tissues: 1:200 mouse platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM; CD31) with 1:500 streptavidin secondary (Strep-CY2), 1:200 CY3-conjugated α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA), 1:100 rabbit neuron-glial antigen 2 (NG2) with 1:100 goat anti-rabbit secondary (GAR-CY3), and 1:100 rabbit lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE-1) with 1:100 GAR-CY3. Staining protocols were replicated as previously stated by Stapor et al., 2013. Briefly, all antibodies were diluted in antibody buffer solution which contained phosphate buffered saline (PBS) + 0.1% saponin + 2% bovine serum albumin. All primary and secondary antibodies were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. After every antibody incubation, tissues were rinsed three times with cold PBS + 0.1% saponin for 10 min.

Stimulation of Angiogenesis

To induce angiogenesis, tissues were cultured in sterile MEM supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco) or 400 ng/mL of recombinant mouse vascular endothelial growth factor-164 (VEGF164; R&D Systems). Tissues were placed in the following groups: 1) Day 0 (n = 8 tissues from 4 mice), 2) Day 3 with 20% FBS (n = 8 tissues from 4 mice), 3) Day 3 without 20% FBS (n = 8 tissues from 4 mice), 4) Day 5 with 20% FBS (n = 8 tissues from 4 mice), 5) Day 5 without 20% FBS (n = 8 tissues from 4 mice), and 6) Day 5 with VEGF (n = 6 tissues from 3 mice). Tissues from day 0 group were fixed and labeled immediately after being excised.

Quantification of Angiogenesis

Using the Java-based NIH ImageJ v.1.0 image processing software, capillary sprouts were quantified for the entire tissue. Capillary sprouts were defined as blind-ended PECAM-positive endothelial cell segments protruding from existing microvessels. The data was normalized per total vessel length. To differentiate between arterioles and venules, the diameter of the blood vessel and the morphology of endothelial cells were examined since arterioles are known to have smaller diameters and more elongated endothelial cells due to their higher shear stress compared to paired venules [12,13]. All arterioles and venules that measured larger than 7 µm in diameter were analyzed.

Microscopy

Images were taken with a 4x (dry, NA = 0.1), 10x (dry, NA = 0.3), and 20x (oil, NA = 0.8; or air, NA = 0.75) objectives from an inverted microscope (Olympus IX71) paired with a Photometrics CoolSNAP EZ camera. Whole tissue images with PECAM labeling were acquired with a 4x or 10x objective to extrapolate vascular data. Time-lapse images were captured using the 10x (dry, NA = 0.3) objective.

Time-Lapse Imaging of Endothelial Cell Dynamics

Additional mesometrium tissues from adult, female FlkEGFP mice with a CD1 background were harvested using the same aseptic techniques. These transgenic mice were graciously provided by Dr. Meadows’ lab from the Department of Cell and Molecular Biology at Tulane University. In the biosafety cabinet, tissues were spread on a 1 µm polycarbonate filter fitted to a cell-crown insert (Sigma-Aldrich) and then inverted into a well from a 6-well culture plate with 4 mL of media supplemented with 20% FBS (Fig. 1B). The culture plate was immediately placed in the incubator, and media was changed every 24 hours. Images of the same venule were acquired with the 10x objective at least once every 24 hours for 7 days. For day 0 and 1, an image was captured every 24 hours; for day 2 and 3, images were captured every 4 hours; and for days 4–7, images were captured every 6 hours.

Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Angiogenesis data with serum was compared across experimental groups with two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests to notify differences between media and serum and between time periods. Angiogenesis data with VEGF was compared using an unpaired two-tailed Student t-test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was executed using GraphPad Prism version 7 software.

RESULTS

Mouse Mesometrium Tissue Contains Intact Microvascular Networks

PECAM-positive labeling of endothelial cells along the hierarchy of branched microvascular networks were present in the thin, connective mesometrium tissue of the uterine horns in female mice (Fig. 2). In contrast, tissues harvested from the mouse mesentery were avascular as expected and displayed no evidence of PECAM-positive labelled networks. Intact networks in the mesometrium were commonly characterized by branching arterioles, venules and capillaries (Fig. 2B and 3A). Vessel types were identified based on endothelial cell morphology and relative vessel diameters [12,13]. Importantly, αSMA-positive smooth muscle cells and NG2-positive pericytes were present in their expected locations and displayed typical wrapping morphologies (Fig. 3B–C). Mesometrium tissues also demonstrated the presence of LYVE-1-positive lymphatics (Fig. 3D). Lymphatics were distinguished by the endothelial cell morphology, intensity of PECAM, and LYVE-1-positive labeling.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Comparison of the microvasculature between mesentery and mesometrium tissue from C57Bl/6 female mice. PECAM labeling identified endothelial cells along intact microvascular networks. (A) Image showing the avascular region of the mouse mesentery tissue. (B) Image showing the vascular region of the mouse mesometrium tissue. The lines denote the border between the connective tissue and the adipose tissue (*). A = arteriole, V = venule, and C = capillary. Scale bars = 100 µm.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Microvascular characterization of the mesometrium tissue. Mouse mesometrium contains PECAM-positive endothelial cells comprising intact microvascular networks with distinguishable arterioles, venules, and capillaries (A), along with supporting cells including αSMA-positive smooth muscle cells (B), and NG2-positive pericytes (C). In addition to blood vessels, the mesometrium also contains LYVE-1-positive lymphatic vessels(D). A = arteriole, V = venule, L = lymphatic, and C = capillary. Arrows show wrapping pericytes. Arrowheads show interstitial LYVE-1-positive cells aligning themselves to capillaries. The * identify adipocytes. Scale bars = 100 µm.

Angiogenesis Can be Stimulated in Cultured Mouse Mesometrium Tissue

Angiogenesis, defined as capillary sprouts, was observed in the mouse mesometrium tissues cultured in MEM supplemented with 20% FBS for 3 and 5 days (Fig. 4A–C). The number of PECAM-positive endothelial cell sprouts per total vascular length significantly increased for the groups supplemented with FBS for 3 (FBS: 3.19 ± 0.78 sprouts/mm, MEM: 0.60 ± 0.18 sprouts/mm, p < 0.0001) and 5 (FBS: 2.49 ± 0.05 sprouts/mm, MEM: 0.80 ± 0.13 sprouts/mm, p = 0.0033) days in culture when compared to the MEM control group (Fig. 4D–F). During culture, tissue viability was confirmed via Live/Dead assay (Supplemental Fig. 1). MEM supplementation with VEGF was also sufficient to induce an increase in the number of PECAM-positive endothelial cell sprouts per total vascular length after 5 days in culture, seen in Fig. 5 (MEM: 0.80 ± 0.13 sprouts/mm, MEM + VEGF: 2.35 ± 0.57 sprouts/mm, p = 0.0031). Capillary sprouts preferentially originated off venules compared to arterioles in all the angiogenic groups which is consistent with in vivo observations [14]. While capillary sprout density was comparable at day 3 and 5, the length of capillary sprouts qualitatively appeared to be longer in day 5 tissues (data not shown).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Angiogenesis is stimulated during culture in intact microvascular networks from mouse mesometrium tissues. Tissues were cultured with MEM supplemented with 20% FBS for 3 (B), and 5 (C) days and compared to day 0 tissues (A), * identify adipocytes. Angiogenic response was quantified by counting the number of capillary sprouts (arrows), defined as blind-ended, PECAM-positive sprouts coming off microvessels, and normalizing it by the total length of the vessels. The total number of sprouts per total vascular length (D), number of sprouts from arterioles per arteriole length (E), and number of sprouts from venules per venule length (F) are shown. The arrowheads indicate vascular islands. A = arteriole and V = venule. Black bars represent MEM alone, and white bars represent MEM supplemented with 20% FBS. Data is shown as the mean + SEM and * represents p < 0.05. Scale bars = 100 µm.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

VEGF media supplementation stimulates angiogenesis. The mouse mesometrium tissues were cultured with MEM (A) or with MEM supplemented with VEGF (B) for 5 days. This resulted in capillary sprouts (arrows), and the presence of vascular islands (arrowheads) which are defined as disconnected endothelial segments. The angiogenic response was quantified by counting the total number of sprouts per total vascular length (C). Data is shown as the mean + SEM and ** represents p < 0.005.

An important aspect for establishing the mouse mesometrium culture model is to investigate pericyte-endothelial cell interactions, which was supported by the angiogenic capillary sprouts covered by NG2-positive pericytes. Moreover, the identified NG2 and αSMA labeling was able to maintain phenotypic dynamics comparable to in vivo. In previous work, NG2 was characterized as an arteriole versus venule smooth muscle cell marker in quiescent tissues and was observed to be upregulated along venules during angiogenesis [15]. Similar NG2 labeling patterns were observed in non-cultured mouse mesometrium tissues. During angiogenesis in culture, NG2-positive cells were present along venules (Fig. 6D–I). Along capillary sprouts, pericytes were typically NG2-positive (Fig. 6D–I) and αSMA-negative (Fig. 6A–C).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Representative images of αSMA and NG2 perivascular cell labeling during angiogenesis stimulated with 20% FBS for 3 days. Mesometrium tissues labeled with PECAM and αSMA antibodies (A–C) show only PECAM-positive leading sprouts (arrowheads). In contrast, mesometrium tissues labeled with PECAM and NG2 antibodies (D–I) show NG2-positive cells leading sprouts (arrows). Images G-I are higher magnifications of the tissue regions indicated by the dashed boxes. Scale bars = 100 µm.

Time-Lapse Imaging Reveals Novel Endothelial Cell Dynamics During Capillary Sprouting

Time-lapse imaging of cultured mesometrium tissues harvested from FlkEGFP mice enabled the tracking of endothelial cell dynamics during capillary sprouting (Fig. 7). Images recorded at least every 24 hours, revealed ‘endothelial cell jumping,’ defined by an endothelial cell disconnecting from a capillary sprout and subsequently connecting to a neighboring capillary sprout (Fig. 8 and Supplemental Movie).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Time-lapse images of a venule in the mesometrium tissue from a FlkEGFP mouse during culture. Images of a venule at the same location were acquired for day 0 (A), 3 (B), 5 (C), and 7 (D). Scale bars = 100 µm.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Time-lapse images of a venule from a FlkEGFP mouse showing ‘endothelial cell jumping’ during 3 and 4 days in culture. Jumping is defined as the disconnection of an endothelial cell sprout and subsequently attaching itself to a neighboring sprout. Arrows highlight the endothelial cell that jumped from one sprout to another, and * indicates the original host sprout for the jumping endothelial cell. Scale bars = 100 µm.

DISCUSSION

The main contributions of this study are the identification of microvascular networks in female mouse mesometrium connective tissue and the establishment of the mouse mesometrium culture model as an ex vivo tool for investigating cellular dynamics involved in angiogenesis. Recently, our laboratory introduced the rat mesentery culture model for real-time investigation of endothelial-pericyte cell interactions during angiogenesis in intact networks [69]. The maintenance of physiological complexity associated with a real network highlights the advantages of the top-down tissue culture approach versus more common bottom-up tissue engineering approaches, such as two- and three-dimensional cell culture [3,4] and microfluidic models [5]. However, the application of our mesentery culture approach for cell lineage or mechanistic studies is limited by the use of rat tissue, the unavailability of varied transgenic rat strains, and the lack of microvasculature in mouse mesentery. Other analogous connective tissues include the omentum and the mouse mesometrium. Since observations suggest the omentum connective tissue is also void of microvascular networks (data not shown), the current study focused on the mesometrium. To our knowledge, these results are the first to show that mesometrium tissue harvested from adult female mice indeed contains intact multicellular microvascular networks with arterioles, venules, and capillaries. Furthermore, the ability to increase capillary sprouting in culture via serum or growth factor media supplementation supports its use as a novel ex vivo model for discovering cell dynamics involved in angiogenesis.

The use of transgenic mouse strains and the application of the mouse mesometrium culture model as a new dynamic view of angiogenesis within intact networks is highlighted by tracking FlkEGFP-positive endothelial cell sprouting off a venule. Our time-lapse observations suggest a phenomenon, which we term ‘endothelial cell jumping.’ Endothelial cells can disconnect from one sprout segment and then reconnect to a neighboring sprout segment. While the functional contribution of ‘endothelial cell jumping’ remains unknown, this finding is consistent with observations of capillary sprouting in mosaic embryoid body cell culture [16]. This suggests an alternative endothelial cell dynamic in an adult tissue that challenges common sprout paradigms. Interestingly, we also observed examples of dramatic increases in the number of vascular islands during angiogenesis in cultured mesometrium tissues (data not shown). We have previously discovered that vascular islands, defined as disconnected endothelial segments, have the ability to reconnect with growing microvascular networks [6,17,18]. The new discovery of ‘endothelial cell jumping’ suggests that disconnected endothelial segments might originate via migration from existing vessels.

Similar to rat mesentery connective tissue, mouse mesometrium is thin and can be easily harvested. The tissue can be whole-mounted and provides an essential two-dimensional view down to the single cell level of an intact three-dimensional microvascular network. Since the mesometrium tissue is self-contained, it does not require embedding into three-dimensional matrix for culturing. Compared to more common models, an advantage of the mesometrium culture model is that capillary sprouting can be quantified at specific locations within a network. While the model currently lacks perfusion, the preferential sprouting off venules and capillaries versus arterioles is physiologically relevant and supports in vivo studies [14]. The physiological relevance is also supported by the presence of smooth muscle cells and pericytes. These two cell types display similar phenotypes as in vivo supported by 1) the presence of NG2-positive and αSMA-negative cells leading PECAM-positive capillary sprouts in serum stimulated tissues, 2) the lack of NG2 labeling along venules in unstimulated tissues and 3) the presence of NG2-positive perivascular cells along venules during angiogenesis [15,1922].

An obvious limitation of the mouse mesometrium tissue is that it limits studies to female mice and does not allow for evaluation of sex differences. Another limitation is the unknown tissue-specific aspects compared to the omentum or the mesentery. Interestingly in the mouse, the mesentery and omentum are avascular and future studies are needed to identify why vessels are normally present in the mesometrium. Additional studies are also warranted to determine how microvascular remodeling dynamics in the mesometrium are the same or different compared to other vascularized tissues like, the rat mesentery. While our results do demonstrate that the mesometrium has similar cell types that comprise an intact microvascular network comparable to the rat mesentery and that angiogenesis can be stimulated in culture, the specific mechanisms for growth in the mesometrium remain undiscovered.

In the current study, angiogenesis was stimulated with media supplemented with 20% serum for up to 7 days. Since an objective of this study was to stimulate angiogenesis in the mouse mesometrium, serum was selected because it has been shown to cause a robust increase in capillary sprouting in the rat mesentery culture model [6,7]. Our results also suggest that VEGF can cause sprouting, yet future experiments will be needed to confirm whether pericyte and endothelial cell phenotypic dynamics are similar to media supplemented tissues. Both 3 Day and 5 Day serum stimulated tissues displayed an increase in capillary sprouting. Further, qualitative observations suggest that Day 5 sprouts were longer than Day 3 sprouts suggesting that the angiogenic effect progresses over time. Longer time point experiments will also be needed to determine the duration that tissues can be kept in culture and the subsequent stages of vessel growth. Previous work in our laboratory has established that rat mesentery tissues remain viable for at least 7 days [6]. We have also observed viable cells and networks with high endothelial segment density in rat mesentery tissues cultured out to 14 days (data not shown). Based on our previous experiences with culturing rat mesentery tissue and the observation of remodeling in the cultured FlkEGFP mesometrium tissues at 7 days, we speculate that mouse mesometrium connective tissues can be cultured out past 7 days.

In addition to containing blood microvascular networks, a subset of mouse mesometrium tissues also contained examples of LYVE-1-positive lymphatic networks. Lymphatic vessels, identified by LYVE-1-positive expression and morphology, displayed similar characteristics to lymphatic vessels in rat mesentery tissues [8,2325]. Interestingly, LYVE-1-positive cells were also observed in the interstitial space with a subpopulation aligning themselves with the microvessels and some even hugging vessels (Fig. 3D). These LYVE-1-positive interstitial cells appear morphologically similar to mural lymphatic endothelial cells which were recently discovered by Bower et al. in larvae zebrafish [26]. The LYVE-1 labeling in the mesometrium coupled with the ability to use specific transgenic mice motivate the future use of the mouse mesometrium culture model for novel cell tracking experiments. These studies will be aimed at identifying the origin and fate of the novel lymphatic interstitial cells and the coordination between angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis.

In summary, our results introduce the mouse mesometrium as an alternative connective tissue to the rat mesentery for studying angiogenesis. As the rat mesentery has proven valuable for discovering cell phenotypic dynamics during microvascular network growth [15,25,2729], we envision the mouse mesometrium will offer a similar impactful view for researchers. Since the mouse mesentery is void of microvascular networks, the mouse mesometrium offers a connective tissue alternative for ex vivo culture and enables new types of real-time cell fate studies.

Supplementary Material

Suppl.movie
Download video file (23.4MB, avi)
2

AKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Dr. Murfee would like to thank the Microcirculatory Society for supporting his visit to Dr. Markus Sperandio’s laboratory in the Walter Brendel Centre of Experimental Medicine (WBex) at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Dr. Murfee especially thanks Dr. Ulrich Pohl, chairman of WBex, for making the visit possible and Dr. Sperandio and the members of his laboratory for sharing their research environment.

Funding Sources:

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Aging under Award Number R01AG049821 (WLM) and Tulane University start-up funds (SMM).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Carmeliet P: Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature 2005;438:932–936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adams RH, Alitalo K: Molecular regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007;8:464–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Goodwin AM: In vitro assays of angiogenesis for assessment of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic agents. Microvasc Res 2007;74:172–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.DelNero P, Lane M, Verbridge SS, Kwee B, Kermani P, Hempstead B, et al. : 3D culture broadly regulates tumor cell hypoxia response and angiogenesis via pro-inflammatory pathways. Biomaterials 2015;55:110–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Song JW, Munn LL: Fluid forces control endothelial sprouting. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2011;108:15342–15347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stapor PC, Azimi MS, Ahsan T, Murfee WL: An angiogenesis model for investigating multicellular interactions across intact microvascular networks. AJP Heart Circ Physiol 2013;304:H235–H245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Azimi MS, Myers L, Lacey M, Stewart SA, Shi Q, Katakam PV, et al. : An Ex Vivo Model for Anti-Angiogenic Drug Testing on Intact Microvascular Networks. PLOS ONE 2015;10:e0119227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sweat RS, Sloas DC, Murfee WL: VEGF-C Induces Lymphangiogenesis and Angiogenesis in the Rat Mesentery Culture Model. Microcirculation 2014;21:532–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Motherwell JM, Azimi MS, Spicer K, Alves NG, Hodges NA, Breslin JW, et al. : Evaluation of Arteriolar Smooth Muscle Cell Function in an Ex Vivo Microvascular Network Model. Sci Rep 2017;7 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02272-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sweat RS, Sloas DC, Stewart SA, Czarny-Ratajczak M, Baddoo M, Eastwood JR, et al. : Aging is associated with impaired angiogenesis, but normal microvascular network structure, in the rat mesentery. Am J Physiol - Heart Circ Physiol 2017;312:H275–H284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Norrby K: In vivo models of angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med 2006;10:588–612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Murfee W, Skalak T, Peirce S: Differential Arterial/Venous Expression of NG2 Proteoglycan in Perivascular Cells Along Microvessels: Identifying a Venule-Specific Phenotype. Microcirculation 2005;12:151–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang M, Aragon M, Murfee WL: Angiogenesis in Mesenteric Microvascular Networks from Spontaneously Hypertensive Versus Normotensive Rats: Angiogenesis in Hypertensive Rat Mesentery. Microcirculation 2011;18:574–582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rhodin J, Fujita H: Capillary growth in the mesentery of normal young rats-Intravital video and electron microscope analyses. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 1989;21:1–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Murfee WL, Rehorn MR, Peirce SM, Skalak TC: Perivascular Cells Along Venules Upregulate NG2 Expression During Microvascular Remodeling. Microcirculation 2006;13:261–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jakobsson L, Franco CA, Bentley K, Collins RT, Ponsioen B, Aspalter IM, et al. : Endothelial cells dynamically compete for the tip cell position during angiogenic sprouting. Nat Cell Biol 2010;12:943–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kelly-Goss MR, Winterer ER, Stapor PC, Yang M, Sweat RS, Stallcup WB, et al. : Cell proliferation along vascular islands during microvascular network growth. BMC Physiol 2012;12:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kelly-Goss MR, Sweat RS, Azimi MS, Murfee WL: Vascular islands during microvascular regression and regrowth in adult networks. Front Physiol 2013;4 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kelly-Goss MR, Sweat RS, Stapor PC, Peirce SM, Murfee WL: Targeting Pericytes for Angiogenic Therapies. Microcirculation 2014;21:345–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nehls V, Drenckhahn D: Heterogeneity of microvascular pericytes for smooth muscle type alpha-actin. J Cell Biol 1991;113:147–154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ponce AM, Price RJ: Angiogenic stimulus determines the positioning of pericytes within capillary sprouts in vivo. Microvasc Res 2003;65:45–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stapor PC, Sweat RS, Dashti DC, Betancourt AM, Murfee WL: Pericyte Dynamics during Angiogenesis: New Insights from New Identities. J Vasc Res 2014;51:163–174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Benest AV, Harper SJ, Herttuala SY, Alitalo K, Bates DO: VEGF-C induced angiogenesis preferentially occurs at a distance from lymphangiogenesis. Cardiovasc Res 2008;78:315–323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Robichaux JL, Tanno E, Rappleye JW, Ceballos M, Stallcup WB, Schmid-Schönbein GW, et al. : Lymphatic/Blood Endothelial Cell Connections at the Capillary Level in Adult Rat Mesentery. Anat Rec Adv Integr Anat Evol Biol 2010;293:1629–1638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sweat RS, Stapor PC, Murfee WL: Relationships Between Lymphangiogenesis and Angiogenesis During Inflammation in Rat Mesentery Microvascular Networks. Lymphat Res Biol 2012;10:198–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bower NI, Koltowska K, Pichol-Thievend C, Virshup I, Paterson S, Lagendijk AK, et al. : Mural lymphatic endothelial cells regulate meningeal angiogenesis in the zebrafish. Nat Neurosci 2017;20:774–783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Anderson CR, Hastings NE, Blackman BR, Price RJ: Capillary Sprout Endothelial Cells Exhibit a CD36low Phenotype. Am J Pathol 2008;173:1220–1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stapor PC, Murfee WL: Identification of class III β-tubulin as a marker of angiogenic perivascular cells. Microvasc Res 2012;83:257–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Benest AV, Bates DO: Measurement of Angiogenic Phenotype by Use of Two-Dimensional Mesenteric Angiogenesis Assay. Angiogenesis Protoc 2009;467:251–270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Suppl.movie
Download video file (23.4MB, avi)
2

RESOURCES