Skip to main content
MethodsX logoLink to MethodsX
. 2018 Jan 31;5:90–95. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2018.01.010

A simple in vitro method to evaluate the toxicity of functional additives used in shrimp aquaculture

Cristóbal Domínguez-Borbor 1, Bolívar Chalén-Alvarado 1, Jenny A Rodríguez 1,
PMCID: PMC6314867  PMID: 30619722

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Keywords: Viable hemocyte, Tetrazolium salts, Metabolism

Abstract

To mitigate the economic losses provoked by disease outbreaks, shrimp producers employ therapeutic additives. However, important issues such as the toxicity of these products on shrimp are not always considered. In vivo toxicity assays require a lot of time and large economic and physical resources. Here, we describe an in vitro procedure to evaluate the toxicity of functional additives, used in the production of shrimp Penaeus vannamei. This method adapted the cell viability assay based on the reduction of tetrazolium salts (MTT) to primary cell cultures of shrimp hemocytes.

  • A simple and reliable tool that requires few physical and economic resources to evaluate in short time (6 h) the cytotoxic effect of therapeutic products and additives to be included in shrimp culture

  • This inexpensive method requires only a modified Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) containing Ca2+ and Mg2+ to keep hemocytes metabolically active to successfully carry out the cytotoxicity assay

  • This toxicity in vitro assay does not require exposure of the shrimp to compounds at toxic concentrations.

Method details

Background

The expansive growth of the shrimp aquaculture industry is accompanied by the disease outbreaks. To mitigate the economic losses, shrimp producers employ therapeutic additives, such as antibiotics, immune modulators, organic acids, essential oil and antioxidants. However, important issues such as the toxicity of these products on shrimp are not always considered. While in vivo toxicity assays require considerable time and economic resources [1], the development of easy and robust in vitro protocols is highly relevant. The cell viability assay developed by Mosman [2], based on the reduction of tetrazolium salts (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl) −2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) (MTT), is widely used to measure in vitro cytotoxic in eukaryotic cells [[2], [3]]. To develop an in vitro toxicity test suited for the assessment of the toxicity of feed additives for shrimps, we adapted this Mosman protocol to primary cell cultures of shrimp hemocytes. This fast and inexpensive assay can be used by the shrimp industry to determine non-toxic therapeutic doses of functional additives as a pre-application process in in vivo trials, and shrimp farms.

Materials

Reagents

Acid chloride (1 N)

Ethanol (70% [v/v] in distilled water)

Calcium chloride solution (Ca Cl2) (1 M; filtrated on a 0.22 μm filter)

Citric acid solution 1 N

Formaldehyde (4% [w/v] in distilled water)

Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS 10x) (Gibco 14185-052)

Hepes solution (kept at 4 °C) (1 M; filtrated on a 0.22 μm filter)

Hydrochloric acid solution 1 N

Isopropanol (kept at 4 °C)

Magnesium chloride solution (Cl2Mg) (1 M; filtrated on a 0.22 μm filter)

Milliq water (filtrated on a 0.22 μm filter)

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)

Sodium chloride solution 2 M (kept at 4 °C)

Sodium citrate (5% and 10% [w/v] in distilled water. Adjusted pH 7) (kept at 4 °C)

Equipment

Combitips

Cotton swab

Membrane filters, white polycarbonate, type HTTP, 0.2-μm pore size, 47-mm diameter

Hematocytometer, Neubauer chamber

Micropipettors, 10 −, 100-, and 1000-μL, with corresponding tips

Microplate reader

Light microscope, phase contrast

Microplates (96-well) (Corning 3361)

Repeater pipettes

Insulin syringe 26 G 1/2S (1 mL)

Microtube centrifuges (1.5 mL)

Assay procedures

Shrimp and hemolymph collection

  • 1

    Load the 1 mL syringes with 100 μL of anticoagulant 10% sodium citrate (w/v). Work at room temperature (25 °C).

  • 2

    Withdraw hemolymph from the ventral sinus of shrimp, which is located at the basis of the first abdominal segment. To avoid contamination, clean the area with a cotton swab soaked in ethanol 70% (v/v).

  • 3

    Mix hemolymph samples and adjust the dilution in anticoagulant to a final ratio of 50/50. Hemolymph samples are kept at room temperature until use, under aseptic conditions.

Hemograma

  • 1

    Fix an aliquot of the hemolymph using formaldehyde 3.7%, in a V/V ratio.

  • 2

    Count the hemocytes using 10 μL of the fixed hemolymph with a hematocytometer (Neubauer chamber). Adjust hemocytes concentration to 1 × 107 cells ml−1, using sodium citrate at 5% in sodium chloride solution 2%.

Primary cell culture of shrimp hemocytes

  • 1

    Deposit the mixture of hemolymph- anticoagulant in 50 μL final volume in microplate wells. Activate the hemocytes with 50 μL/well of modified Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS), containing HBSS 1x, 2.6 g l−1 HEPES, 85 mM NaCl, 12 mM Ca2+ and 26 mM Mg2+, pH 7.2 (MHBSS-3), filtrated on a 0.22 μm filter. Incubate for 60 min at room temperature for adherence of the hemocytes. Prepare fresh MHBSS, 30 min before use.

  • 2

    Eliminate the supernatants and immediately deposit 50 μL/well of MHBSS-2 containing HBSS 1X, 6 mM Ca2+ and 12 mM Mg2+ (pH 7.2).

Exposure of hemocytes to assessed product

  • 1

    The product to be evaluated is dissolved in MHBSS-2 at different concentrations. Distribute 50 μL per well (minimum three replicates by dilution factor) onto hemocyte primary cultures. As a positive control (untreated cells) deposit by triplicate only 50 μL of MHBSS-2. Incubate for 90 min at 25 °C.

  • 2

    After incubation, add 10 μL of MTT (5 mg/ml MTT in milliq water) to all wells and incubate for 120 min at 25 °C. Keep in the dark.

  • 3

    After 120 min of incubation, shrimp hemocytes become stained with formazan and the wells turn purple (Fig. 1B). Remove the supernatant, and add 150 μL of isopropanol containing 0.04 N HCl. Homogenize vigorously to dissolve the formazan crystals (Fig. 1A), placing the microplate onto an ice bed.

  • 4

    Read at 620 nm in a microplate reader. The percentage of cell viability is obtained using the formula.

Cell viability OD = (OD exposed cells/OD control cells) × 100%

OD: Optical density our 620 nm.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

MTT reduction assay performed in shrimp haemocytes. (A), wells containing formazan crystals dissolved in isopropanol. (B), shrimp hemocytes stained with formazan (arrows). Scale bar, 100 μm.

Additional information

The toxicity assay developed by Mossman [2] has been applied in several studies with eukaryotic cells and it is widely used to measure cytotoxic, and antiproliferative activity of compounds [3]. This test has also been used by Jose et al. [4] to estimate the viability of hemocytes of Penaeus monodon shrimp to study the White Spot Syndrome Virus in vitro. In our study we used the procedure described by Muñoz et al. [5] to perform primary cell cultures of P. vannamei haemocytes. This method requires only a solution of MHBSS containing Ca2+ and Mg2+ to keep hemocytes metabolically active (Fig. 1B) to successfully carry out the cytotoxicity assay.

We used this assay to evaluate the toxic doses of different aquaculture additives, such as essential oils and antibiotics amongst others. In the (Fig. 2), we illustrated the effect of essential oil of Origanum vulgare (18% oil of O. vulgare), over shrimp hemocyte viability. O. vulgare essential oil is rich in thymol and carvacrol, phenolic compounds with several bioactivities [6], antioxidant [[7], [8], [9]], microbicidal [[10], [11], [12]] and immune modulator [13]. The results obtained with our in vitro test indicated that O. vulgare essential oil is not toxic for hemocyte at concentration 0.1, 1 and 10 ppm as no significant differences in cell viability were found between control and treatments. At these concentrations less than 10% of the hemocytes were affected (Fig. 2). Based on these results we performed an in vivo study. Post-larvae from P. vannamei shrimp in PL-1, were exposed to O. vulgare essential oil, using several doses between 0.1 and 10 ppm. The post-larvae survival was slightly affected 10% only at 10 ppm. These results were consistent with in vitro results, indicating the effectiveness of in vitro assay to determine no toxic therapeutic doses of functional additives as a pre-application process in in vivo trials. Also, we evaluated the toxicity in vitro of oxitetracicline (OTC) and florfenicol, antibiotics commonly used in aquaculture. Recording toxicity for oxytetracycline and florfenicol in shrimp hemocytes at concentrations of 4000 and 2000 μg/ml respectively. At these concentrations 15% of the cell viability was affected. Combining this information together with data of bacterial resistance, researchers and producers could effective doses of these drugs at commercial scale.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Toxicity assay performed with essential oil of O. vulgare over shrimp hemocytes (after 4 h). Viability of hemocytes in the control treatment was established at 100% and the other treatments were normalized accordingly. *,significantly different from control (P > 0.05, Duncan’s new multiple range test).

In conclusion, this test is a simple and reliable tool that requires few physical and economic resources to evaluate in short time (6 h) the cytotoxic effect of therapeutic products and additive to be included in shrimp culture.

Acknowledgements

This work was funde by the Secretaría de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología e Innovación of Ecuador (SENESCYT) in the framework of the PIC-14-CENAIM-001 Project “Caracterización de la Biodiversidad Microbiológica y de Invertebrados de la Reserva Marina El Pelado a escala taxonómica, metabolómica y metagenómica para su uso en Salud Humana y Animal”. We thank Amanda Esliva, Sofie Van Den Hende and Mario Marchionni for her assistance with preparation of this article in English.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2018.01.010.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is Supplementary data to this article:

Download video file (63.6MB, mp4)

References

  • 1.Yang Q., Scheie A.A., Benneche T., Defoirdt T. Specific quorum sensing-disrupting activity (A QSI) of thiophenones and their therapeutic potential. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(December):18033. doi: 10.1038/srep18033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods. 1983;2:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rodrigues D., Alves C., Horta A., Pinteus S., Silva J., Culioli G., Thomas O.P., Pedrosa R. Antitumor and antimicrobial potential of bromoditerpenes isolated from the Red Alga, Sphaerococcus coronopifolius. Mar. Drugs. 2015;13(2):713–726. doi: 10.3390/md13020713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jose S., Mohandas A., Philip R., Bright Singh I.S. Primary hemocyte culture of Penaeus monodon as an in vitro model for white spot syndrome virus titration, viral and immune related gene expression and cytotoxicity assays. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2010;105(3):312–321. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2010.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Muñoz M., Cedeño R., Rodríguez J., Van Der Knaap W.P.W., Mialhe E., Bachère E. Measurement of reactive oxygen intermediate production in haemocytes of the penaeid shrimp, Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2000;3:89–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pezzani R., Vitalini S., Iriti M. Bioactivities of Origanum vulgare L.: an update. Phytochem. Rev. 2017;16(6):1253–1268. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sarikurkcu C., Zengin G., Oskay M., Uysal S., Ceylan R., Aktumsek A. Composition, antioxidant, antimicrobial and enzyme inhibition activities of two Origanum vulgare subspecies (subsp. vulgare and subsp. hirtum) essential oils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015;70:178–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Diler O., Gormez O., Diler I., Metin S. Effect of oregano (Origanum onites L.) essential oil on growth, lysozyme and antioxidant activity and resistance against Lactococcus garvieae in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) Aquac. Nutr. 2017;23(4):844–851. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ozdemir N., Ozgen Y., Kiralan M., Bayrak A., Arslan N., Ramadan M.F. Effect of different drying methods on the essential oil yield, composition and antioxidant activity of Origanum vulgare L. and Origanum onites L. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2017:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bassolé I.H.N., Juliani H.R. Essential oils in combination and their antimicrobial properties. Molecules. 2012;17(4):3989–4006. doi: 10.3390/molecules17043989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Alvarez M.V., Ortega-Ramirez L.A., Gutierrez-Pacheco M.M., Bernal-Mercado A.T., Rodriguez-Garcia I., Gonzalez-Aguilar G.A., Ponce A., del Moreira M.R., Roura S.I., Ayala-Zavala J.F. Oregano essential oil-pectin edible films as anti-quorum sensing and food antimicrobial agents. Front. Microbiol. 2014;5(December):1–7. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ezzat Abd El-Hack M., Alagawany M., Ragab Farag M., Tiwari R., Karthik K., Dhama K., Zorriehzahra J., Adel M. Beneficial impacts of thymol essential oil on health and production of animals, fish and poultry: a review. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2016;28(5):365–382. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.He W., Rahimnejad S., Wang L., Song K., Lu K., Zhang C. Effects of organic acids and essential oils blend on growth, gut microbiota, immune response and disease resistance of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) against Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017;70:164–173. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Download video file (63.6MB, mp4)

Articles from MethodsX are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES