Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jun;46(6):e58–e59. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.02.013

Authors’ Response

Kelvin Choi 1, Jean L Forster 2
PMCID: PMC6317066  NIHMSID: NIHMS1001726  PMID: 24842747

Our population−based prospective cohort study of U.S. Midwest young adults who had never tried e-cigarettes at baseline revealed that 22% of current smokers, 12% of former smokers, and 3% of nonsmokers reported ever using e-cigarettes 1 year later.1 We also observed that, in this real-world setting, favorable beliefs about e-cigarettes at baseline predicted subsequent e-cigarette experimentation. Given that young adults are still developing their tobacco-use behaviors, we concluded that informing them about the lack of evidence to support e-cigarettes as quit aids and the unknown health risk of e-cigarettes may deter young adults from trying these products, which were introducing/reintroducing some young adults to nicotine addiction.

Knight-West et al. question this conclusion on the grounds that e-cigarette experimentation by nonsmokers is not important, given very few use e-cigarettes daily. They also speculate that e-cigarette experimentation may represent cessation of or reduction in smoking. Fortunately, we have the data necessary to address these hypothetical problems directly.

At the 1-year follow up, 10% of young adult non-smokers who had tried e-cigarettes at baseline became current cigarette smokers at follow-up versus 5% of non-smokers who had never tried e-cigarettes (OR=2.11, 95% CI=0.48, 9.26, p=0.32; n=1,476). Although the CI is wide owing to small numbers of nonsmokers trying e-cigarettes, these data are consistent with the possibility that e-cigarette experimentation is acting as a pathway to cigarette smoking.

Our longitudinal data show no benefits of e-cigarette use on relapse, quitting, and cutting down on conventional cigarettes. E-cigarette experimentation does not prevent relapse among young adult former smokers: 20% of young adult former smokers who tried e-cigarettes at baseline relapsed into smoking at follow-up versus 18% among young adult former smokers who had not tried e-cigarettes (OR=1.14, 95% CI=0.35, 3.71, p=0.82; n=243). Furthermore, more frequent use of e-cigarettes does not promote cessation or reduce cigarette consumption. Eleven percent of smokers who used e-cigarettes ≥1 day in the past 30 days at baseline quit smoking at follow-up, whereas 17% of smokers who never used e-cigarettes quit smoking (OR=0.93, 95% CI=0.19, 4.63, p=0.93; n=346). Changes in average number of cigarettes per day between baseline and follow-up were almost identical between smokers who smoked e-cigarettes ≥1 day in the past 30 days at baseline and those who never used e-cigarettes (smokers who used e-cigarettes ≥1 day in the past 30 days at baseline=0.0, smokers who never tried e-cigarettes= −0.2, difference= 0.0 − (−0.2) = 0.2, 95% CI= −3.72, 4.18, p=0.91). These analyses were adjusted for demographics and baseline cigarette consumption.

Finally, our results are consistent with previous population-based studies showing no association2,3 or a negative association4 between e-cigarette use and intention to quit smoking or successful quit attempts among U.S. smokers. These population-based studies provide a better estimate of the effects of e-cigarettes as they are actually used than the RCT by Bullen et al.5 Our data suggest that e-cigarettes are not effective as a technique for quitting smoking and may act as a gateway to smoking conventional cigarettes in young adults.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest:

No conflict of interest was reported by the authors of this letter. Dr. Choi is supported by the Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. Dr. Forster is supported by the National Cancer Institute through research grants. The sponsors did not have any role in the study. The data for the analysis were collected while Dr. Choi was at the University of Minnesota.

Contributor Information

Kelvin Choi, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Division of Intramural Research, Bethesda, Maryland.

Jean L. Forster, University of Minnesota Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

References

  • 1.Choi K, Forster JL. Beliefs and experimentation with electronic cigarettes: a prospective analysis among young adults. Am J Prev Med 2014;46(2):175–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adkison SE, O’Connor RJ, Bansal-Travers M, et al. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: international tobacco control four-country survey. Am J Prev Med 2013;44(3):207–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vickerman KA, Carpenter KM, Altman T, Nash CM, Zbikowski SM. Use of electronic cigarettes among state tobacco cessation quitline callers. Nicotine Tob Res 2013;15(10):1787–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Popova L, Ling PM. Alternative tobacco product use and smoking cessation: a national study. Am J Public Health 2013;103(5):923–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bullen C, Howe C, Laugesen M, et al. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013;382(9905):1629–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES