Skip to main content
NCBI home page
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2018 Dec 20;2018:6084541. doi: 10.1155/2018/6084541

Alcohol Consumption and Risky Drinking Patterns among College Students from Selected Countries of the Carpathian Euroregion

Maria Zadarko-Domaradzka 1, Zbigniew Barabasz 1, Marek Sobolewski 2, Edyta Nizioł-Babiarz 1, Beata Penar-Zadarko 3, Agnieszka Szybisty 1, Emilian Zadarko 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6317088  PMID: 30671465

Abstract

Reduction of excessive alcohol consumption still remains a significant challenge to the actions in the scope of public health of European citizens. The aim of this study is to present the prevalence of alcohol consumption and to estimate the occurrence of risky drinking among college students from the Polish, Slovak, Romanian, and Ukrainian parts of the Carpathian Euroregion, taking social contexts into account. The consumption of alcohol was estimated on the basis of the respondents' statements regarding the quantity and frequency of their consumption of beer, wine, and vodka. The study included people from the first year of undergraduate studies. The analysis used the Chi-square independence test and odds ratios (ORs). There were significant differences in the frequency of alcohol consumption, as well as the individual types consumed, among the respondents from the analyzed countries. Of the examined college students, 70% admit to occasional drinking. The pattern of dangerous alcohol consumption occurs in the case of approximately every seventh person. Risky drinking occurs with much greater frequency among male students rather than their female counterparts. In Romania, a very small percentage of female students engage in risky drinking. The analysis did not show statistically significant differences in the frequency of risky drinking between countries. The coexistence of other adverse health behaviors, such as smoking and alcohol abuse, was confirmed.

1. Introduction

Alcoholic beverages, in addition to tobacco products, are the most widespread and socially accepted psychoactive substances in all age groups over 15, and their abuse is classified as harmful to health [1, 2]. Tobacco and alcohol are among the main risk factors for premature death and morbidity in Europe [3, 4]. In a 2013 ranking of the top 25 leading health risk factors in the world, tobacco and alcohol were in the 2nd and 6th place, respectively [5]. Alcohol is a substance used by adolescents in early and late puberty, causing a serious public health concern [6–8]. Health problems are not exclusively the domain of people addicted to alcohol, as they are also observed among people who abuse alcohol on a temporary or occasional basis [9]. Limits of alcohol consumption have been adopted by many countries to identify risky drinking; above these limits, people are exposed to a greater risk of experiencing detrimental health effects. The limits usually differ slightly among countries and cultures and, as in the case of Slovakia, there may be no official definition for the pure alcohol content of standard drinks [10].

The extent of alcohol consumption has social, moral, religious, and economic determinants, as described in numerous publications [11–13]. Alcohol consumption varies greatly depending on sex, age, and region [14–17]. Analysis of the literature on the subject indicates that the scale of alcohol consumption and the determinants and consequences of its abuse are areas of interest to many authors [18–23]. The results of published research confirm that dangerous alcohol consumption is observed in young adults [18, 23].

Among the research focused on risky drinking, international comparison of this behavior in students from Central and Eastern Europe has been studied the least. In 2016, a prospective study from Russia, Poland, Lithuania, and the Czech Republic was published; however, the analysis concerned people over 45 years of age [24]. National results of studies on the prevalence of alcohol consumption among students have been published, for example, in Slovakia [11], Poland [19, 25, 26], and Romania [27].

It is difficult to find reports comparing research results of alcohol drinking among students of the Carpathian Euroregion countries. The Carpathian Euroregion has existed since 1993 and covers the border regions of five countries—Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Ukraine, and Hungary. It was created to facilitate and coordinate multisector cross-border cooperation between the regions of the five postcommunist countries [28].

According to the WHO, these countries show high alcohol consumption, above the 2016 estimated European average of 10.3L per capita. Therefore, the analysis presented in this paper may supplement data on college students of the Carpathian Euroregion.

Studying cross-border health behaviors plays a key role in shaping the direction of local policy, intervention, and education of a given region in the sphere of public health and for mitigating existing threats. The aim of this study is to present the prevalence of alcohol consumption and to assess the occurrence of risky drinking among young people studying in the Carpathian Euroregion, taking into account the social context (place of residence, parents' education, and financial situation).

2. Materials and Methods

The analysis described in this report is based on data collected from surveys completed by a total of 1686 randomly selected college students from four significant university cities in the Carpathian Euroregion: Prešov (Slovakia), Lviv (Ukraine), Oradea (Romania), and Rzeszow (Poland). The respondents are students in their first cycle (bachelor's degree). Data from 1369 (81.2%) respondents were identified for inclusion in this cross-sectional study. The included data were taken from surveys that provided comprehensive information on alcohol consumption and other variables included in the analysis. Incomplete questionnaires were not considered in the analysis (a filled-in profile, but lack of answers to the questionnaire questions or the opposite, a missed answer to at least one question or the answer marked in a way not compliant with the instructions). The age range of the studied population is 18–22 years. The gender structure of the respondents in the compared countries is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Structure of the studied group.

Gender Country Total
Poland Slovakia Ukraine Romania
N % N % N % N % N %
Female 223 51.1 215 56.0 90 42.1 199 59.4 727 53.1
Male 213 48.9 169 44.0 124 57.9 136 40.6 642 46.9
Total 436 100.0 384 100.0 214 100.0 335 100.0 1369 100.0
Open in a new tab

The survey used a traditional pencil-and-paper (p&p) questionnaire in the mother tongue of the country being analyzed, and it was completed voluntarily and anonymously. Each questionnaire contained information for the participant about the purpose of the study. Questions related to alcohol consumption were of a closed type; additional variables such as age, sex, parents' education, place of residence, financial situation during studies, and cigarette smoking were also included. The tool had been verified in terms of the comprehensibility of the questions formulated, demonstrating the absence of linguistic and structural failures. The project was approved by the Bioethical Commission of the University of Rzeszow in Rzeszow (Poland) (No. 1/06/2014). The amount of alcohol consumed was estimated on the basis of information obtained from the respondents on the frequency of consumption of alcoholic beverages (vodka, beer, and wine), including one-off consumption, in the last year. The quantity–frequency (QF) method has been used in this study of drinking consumption. The frequency of drinking was measured as follows: I do not drink; I drink several times a year; once a month; once a week; 3–4 times a week; every day. The amount of alcohol consumed was measured according to portions defined as 250 mL of 5% beer, 30 mL of 40% vodka, or 100 mL of 12% wine, each of which being one standard portion of pure alcohol, about 10 g. A graphical depiction of the different portions of ethanol for the three measured alcohol varieties was presented to and discussed with the respondents before they completed the questionnaire. Consumption of excessive amounts of alcohol at once or over a period of time, without entailing negative somatic or mental consequences, is referred to as risky drinking [29, 30]. Risky drinking may also include situations of drinking alcohol under inappropriate circumstances, such as during pregnancy [31] or when taking medications that interact with alcohol [32]. According to the Polish drinking guidelines, which coincide with the limits set by the WHO, the limit for women is 20–40 g of pure alcohol (2–4 standard drinks) per day, and the limit for men is 40–60 g (4–6 standard drinks) [33]. Based on the WHO classification [33] of alcohol consumption patterns, risky drinking was defined as drinking at least 140 g of alcohol per week for women (20 g daily) and 280 g per week for men (40 g per day). The analysis took into account social variables (parents' education, permanent place of residence, residence during studies, and financial situation during studies) and those related to alcohol consumption and smoking (frequency of consumption, types of alcoholic beverages consumed, and smoking status). The comparisons were made based on the gender and country of the students surveyed.

Demographic data and the pattern of alcohol consumption are presented using descriptive statistics. In the analysis reported below, the Chi-square independence test was used for (1) analyzing the significance of differences in the distribution of traits describing the consumption of particular types of alcohol among countries and (2) demonstrating the relationship between risky drinking and independent factors. The comparison of risky drinking frequency between women and men was supplemented with the odds ratio (OR). The chance of the occurrence of a given phenomenon is determined by the result of dividing the probability of its occurrence by the probability of the occurrence of the opposite event. For example, if a given phenomenon occurred in the analyzed cases, the chance of its occurrence is 1. The odds ratio is a comparison of such a defined level of chance between two groups. To assess whether the difference in the frequency of the occurrence of a given phenomenon is statistically significant, the 95% interval for the OR is also given. If this interval does not include the value 1, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in the chances of a given phenomenon occurring between the two compared groups. Statistical significance was assumed for p values < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the STATISTICA v. 12 program.

3. Results

3.1. Detailed Information about Drinking Alcohol in the Studied Population

The information from the study population's self-assessment shows significant differences in the frequency of alcohol consumption as well as in the frequency of individual types consumed among respondents from different countries, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Self-assessment of the frequency of drinking different types of alcohol by country.

  Poland Slovakia Ukraine Romania Total p value
N % N % N % N % N %
Alcohol                     < 0.001
 never 34 7.8 52 13.5 44 20.6 138 41.2 268 19.6
 in the past 13 3.0 26 6.8 21 9.8 10 3.0 70 5.1
 occasionally 359 82.3 287 74.7 135 63.1 179 53.4 960 70.1
 regularly 30 6.9 19 4.9 14 6.5 8 2.4 71 5.2
Standard drinks per week mean (SD) 10.2 (14.1) 9.7 (16.1) 9.7 (14.7) 6.5 (14.6) 9.1 (14.9)
Beer                     < 0.001
 I do not drink 64 14.7 126 32.8 67 31.3 169 50.4 426 31.1
 several times a year 31 7.1 32 8.3 7 3.3 32 9.6 102 7.5
 once a month 81 18.6 39 10.2 19 8.9 20 6.0 159 11.6
 once a week 140 32.1 100 26.0 58 27.1 62 18.5 360 26.3
 3–4 times a week 107 24.5 70 18.2 55 25.7 44 13.1 276 20.2
 every day 13 3.0 17 4.4 8 3.7 8 2.4 46 3.4
Standard drinks per week mean (SD) 6.6 (9.4) 5.0 (8.3) 5.8 (9.0) 3.7 (9.3) 5.3 (9.1)  
Vodka                     < 0.001
 I do not drink 92 21.1 148 38.5 90 42.1 226 67.5 556 40.6
 several times a year 104 23.9 61 15.9 24 11.2 38 11.3 227 16.6
 once a month 130 29.8 67 17.4 46 21.5 21 6.3 264 19.3
 once a week 85 19.5 84 21.9 44 20.6 41 12.2 254 18.6
 3–4 times a week 24 5.5 24 6.3 7 3.3 8 2.4 63 4.6
 every day 1 0.2 0 0.0 3 1.4 1 0.3 5 0.4
Standard drinks per week mean (SD) 2.6 (5.9) 2.8 (6.5) 2.4 (6.4) 0.9 (3.7) 2.2 (5.7)  
Wine                     < 0.001
 I do not drink 157 36.0 129 33.6 74 34.6 162 48.4 522 38.1
 several times a year 117 26.8 71 18.5 42 19.6 50 14.9 280 20.5
 once a month 82 18.8 88 22.9 42 19.6 35 10.4 247 18.0
 once a week 69 15.8 71 18.5 46 21.5 59 17.6 245 17.9
 3–4 times a week 9 2.1 24 6.3 8 3.7 26 7.8 67 4.9
 every day 2 0.5 1 0.3 2 0.9 3 0.9 8 0.6
Standard drinks per week mean (SD) 1.0 (2.3) 1.9 (5.3) 1.4 (3.9) 1.9 (5.3) 1.5 (4.4)  
Open in a new tab

Of the surveyed college students, 70% consumed alcohol occasionally. The largest percentage (41.2%) of the respondents who stated that they did not drink alcohol were Romanian students. Most participants from Poland drank alcohol (82.3%) occasionally, while the statements from the other nations were equally high, with over 50% drinking alcohol occasionally. Every day, beer was said to be consumed by 4.4% of Slovak and 3.7% of Ukrainian participants. Almost one-fourth of the students from Poland and Ukraine drank beer 3–4 times a week, while 5.3% of Slovaks and 5.5% of Poles admitted to drinking vodka several times a week. Among the surveyed students from Ukraine, 1.4% stated that they drank vodka daily. Romanian students most often drank wine—0.9% daily and 7.8% 3–4 times a week. The students from Poland and Slovakia drank the least amount of wine. The distribution of the frequency of alcohol consumption by women and men in individual countries is presented in Table 3. The smallest differences between men and women (in particular, regarding wine consumption) occur in the Ukrainian group of students.

Table 3.

Frequency of alcohol consumption with reference to gender and country.

  Poland (%) Slovakia (%) Ukraine (%) Romania (%) p F/pM1
Frequency of consumption of Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male  
Alcohol                 < 0.001/< 0.001
 never 9.4 6.1 15.8 10.7 24.4 17.7 55.8 19.9
 in the past 1.8 4.2 3.3 11.2 3.3 14.5 2.5 3.7
 occasionally 88.8 75.6 78.6 69.8 68.9 58.9 40.2 72.8
 regularly 0.0 14.1 2.3 8.3 3.3 8.9 1.5 3.7
 pF  vs.  M2 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.01 < 0.001  
Beer                 < 0.001/0.03
 I do not drink 18.4 10.8 42.3 20.7 40.0 25.0 67.8 25.0
 several times a year 11.2 2.8 11.6 4.1 3.3 3.2 11.1 7.4
 once a month 26.9 9.9 10.7 9.5 10.0 8.1 3.5 9.6
 once a week 32.7 31.5 26.0 26.0 28.9 25.8 11.1 29.4
 3–4 times a week 10.8 39.0 8.4 30.8 16.7 32.3 5.0 25.0
 every day 0.0 6.1 09 8.9 1.1 5.6 1.5 3.7
 pF  vs.  M < 0.001 < 0.001 0.04 < 0.001  
Vodka                 < 0.001/< 0.001
 I do not drink 22.9 19.2 45.6 29.6 60.0 29.0 78.4 51.5
 several times a year 34.5 12.7 22.3 7.7 10.0 12.1 10.6 12.5
 once a month 31.4 28.2 18.6 16.0 16.7 25.0 4.5 8.8
 once a week 8.5 31.0 12.1 34.3 11.1 27.4 6.0 21.3
 3–4 times a week 2.7 8.5 1.4 12.4 2.2 4.0 0.5 5.1
 every day 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.7
 pF  vs.  M < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001  
Wine                 < 0.001/< 0.001
 I do not drink 29.1 43.2 27.4 41.4 31.1 37.1 59.3 32.4
 several times a year 32.7 20.7 23.7 11.8 21.1 18.5 18.1 10.3
 once a month 23.3 14.1 30.2 13.6 18.9 20.2 7.0 15.4
 once a week 12.6 19.2 14.0 24.3 25.6 18.5 12.6 25.0
 3–4 times a week 2.2 1.9 4.2 8.9 3.3 4.0 3.0 14.7
 every day 0.0 0.9 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 2.2
 pF  vs.  M < 0.001 < 0.001 0.63 < 0.001  
Open in a new tab

1 p F/pM: assessment of the significance of differences between the frequency of alcohol consumption in individual countries (separately for female and male groups).

2 p F  vs.  M: assessment of the significance of differences between the frequency of alcohol consumption between female and male groups (separately for each country).

3.2. Risky Drinking

The pattern of risky alcohol consumption occurred in the case of 13.6% of people from the studied group.

Taking into account the gender of the respondents, it was found that this phenomenon occurred at a much greater frequency among male college students. That is, men consumed alcohol in a risky manner more often than female college students did (OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.81–3.46) (see Table 4).

Table 4.

Risky drinking among respondents, including gender and country.

  Female (%) Male (%) Odds ratio (95% CI) p value
Total 8.7 19.2 2.50 (1.81–3.46) < 0.001
Poland 10.8 21.1 2.22 (1.30–3.80) < 0.01
Slovakia 9.8 20.1 2.33 (1.29–4.18) < 0.01
Ukraine 12.2 16.1 1.38 (0.63–3.05) 0.42
Romania 3.5 17.6 5.88 (2.45–14.08) < 0.001
Open in a new tab

The frequency of risky drinking among female and male college students was also considered independently for the population from each country (Table 4). Only in Ukraine are there no statistically significant differences in the frequency of risky drinking among female and male students (p = 0.4228). In contrast, in the other countries, a significantly higher percentage of men drank in a risky manner. More than twice as many male respondents from Poland (OR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.30–3.80) and Slovakia (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.29–4.18) and almost six times as many from Romania (OR = 5.88, 95% CI = 2.45–14.08) were more likely to engage in risky drinking, compared to the surveyed female students from these countries. In Romania, a small percentage of female students drank in a risky way. The results of the comparative analysis of the occurrence of risky drinking among students from individual countries indicate a lack of statistically significant differences between the countries in the incidence of risky drinking among male college students. In contrast, for female students, the difference between countries is statistically significant (p = 0,02), although it boils down to differences only for Romania—in this country, the level of risky drinking among female students is lower than in the other countries.

3.3. Factors related to Risky Alcohol Drinking

Table 5 shows the percentage of people who drank in a risky manner at different levels of several independent factors, i.e., place of permanent residence, residence during studies, parents' education, financial situation during studies, and cigarette smoking. The analysis was carried out separately for each country and sex. A key variable associated with risky alcohol consumption by students is smoking cigarettes. This relationship is present for both female (p < 0.01) and male college students (p = 0.02) in Poland and Slovakia (p < 0.001, p < 0.001) and only for male students from Ukraine (p < 0.01) and Romania (p < 0.001).

Table 5.

Factors associated with risky drinking.

  Poland (%) Slovakia (%) Ukraine (%) Romania (%)
Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
Factors                
Place of residence
 Village 22.1 7.1 26.7 7.7 12.2 16.7 11.5 6.4
 City 19.2 15.8 14.9 12.5 18.5 10.2 21.4 1.8
p value 0.60 0.04 0.06 0.24 0.37 0.38 0.14 0.09
Living during studies
 family house 17.4 6.1 17.2 4.8 16.0 12.5 17.4 1.1
 homestay 16.1 13.6 11.1 7.7 13.8 10.7 18.2 4.8
 dormitory 40.0 16.7 24.0 14.0 17.8 13.6 17.6 6.1
p value 0.01 0.11 0.23 0.13 0.90 0.95 1.00 0.26
Father's education
 vocational 23.8 5.6 16.4 8.2 16.7 5.0 14.6 3.1
 secondary 17.6 16.7 22.4 9.1 23.8 29.4 16.4 2.2
 higher 17.6 20.0 22.6 14.3 14.9 10.2 25.8 8.1
p value 0.54 0.02 0.64 0.54 0.64 0.06 0.41 0.25
Mother's education
 vocational 24.5 8.8 15.4 5.5 11.5 10.0 10.3 3.7
 secondary 20.2 9.8 23.6 12.7 27.3 15.4 17.9 1.9
 higher 17.6 17.5 17.5 7.1 16.3 10.9 25.6 7.7
p value 0.68 0.31 0.50 0.27 0.50 0.88 0.21 0.25
Smoking
 never 16.2 6.8 10.9 3.9 7.2 8.0 8.8 3.3
 in the past 28.6 20.7 20.7 5.9 5.6 15.8 46.7 7.1
 occasionally 10.0 19.4 37.5 14.3 58.3 25.0 30.0 0.0
 regularly 46.2 11.1 38.7 35.5 37.5 40.0 55.6 7.7
p value < 0.01 0.04 < 0.01 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.15 < 0.001 0.59
Smoking1
 no 16.2 6.8 10.9 3.9 7.2 8.0 8.8 3.3
 yes 29.7 18.9 31.6 18.6 30.4 21.9 44.1 4.3
p value 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.01 0.07 < 0.001 0.73
Financial situation
 difficult 15.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 25.0 41.7 24.1 6.1
 average 22.2 4.7 21.9 6.3 11.8 7.4 12.5 3.6
 good 22.4 17.6 20.6 11.0 17.5 7.8 19.6 2.7
p value 0.59 0.01 0.45 0.50 0.42 < 0.01 0.37 0.65
Open in a new tab

1Dichotomous division, where “yes” contains smoking in the past and currently.

The other analyzed variables for the group from Slovakia, Ukraine, and Romania do not have a clear relationship with the risky drinking model. In contrast, in Poland, there is a relationship between the place of residence and risky drinking among female students, more so among urban residents (p = 0.04). There is also a dependence between the place of residence during studies and a pattern of risky drinking among male students, definitely more so among students living in dormitories (p = 0.01). The conducted analysis also shows a significant relationship between father's education and risky drinking among female participants. Female college students whose fathers are better educated are more likely to drink in a risky way (p = 0.02).

4. Discussion

Excessive alcohol consumption is a recurring phenomenon among students of many universities in the world [34–36]. In both Canada and Australia, risky drinking is associated with the ages of 18–24 years [13]. Research among the Swedish population showed that the 18–29 age group accounted for almost one-third of people who drink dangerously [18]. Other reports indicate that the rates of risky drinking and heavy episodic drinking in young people, especially women, have increased in many OECD countries [10]. Also, the results of a study published at the beginning of 2017, comparing alcohol consumption for the periods 2001–2002 and 2012–2013, drew attention to the increase in the percentage of people who drink riskily in the American population [23].

College students are a special group of young adults as far as alcohol consumption is concerned. Factors such as increased independence, reduced parental supervision, and more social contacts potentially contribute to the increased consumption of alcohol in this group [37]. Research results have highlighted the vulnerability of these young adults, university students, to risky health behaviors [22, 27, 34, 38–44].

According to the present study, over 80% of the college students in the Carpathian Euroregion consume alcohol, of which 70% admit to its occasional consumption, and 5.2% consume it regularly. Beer is the most preferred drink for all students. Gender is a factor that significantly differentiates both alcohol consumption and the type of alcohol among subjects. The distribution of the alcohol consumed by participants from Poland indicates that this group drinks more beer and vodka than those from the other three countries, but it consumes less wine than the respondents from Slovakia and Ukraine, which agrees with the reports of the WHO [45], according to which, Polish citizens consume most of all beer, followed by vodka (spirits) and wine. The research of Podstawski et al. [26] proved that beer remains the most popular alcoholic beverage among Polish students. Similarly, the data on the type of alcohol preferred by the Romanian students are in line with the WHO data [45], which state that the highest percentage of Romanian people drink beer, followed by wine and vodka. Students from Slovakia and Ukraine consume spirit drinks the least, preferring the other two types of alcohol. Beer and wine predominated, which does not fully coincide with the WHO countrywide data for these countries. At the same time, the gender classification shows that male college students from Slovakia and Ukraine consume the most beer, followed by vodka and wine. On the other hand, female students from Romania, Slovakia, and Ukraine more often choose wine than beer or spirits, which agrees with reports by other authors [14, 27]. When analyzing the results, one should consider the regional differences related to the culture of drinking alcohol [46]. Our data for college students from Poland and Ukraine are not fully in line with the trends characteristic of the drinking culture of the region (the northern European pattern); these countries are regarded as postcommunist, where the preferred type of alcoholic drinks are spirits.

Risky drinking occurs with a much greater frequency among men than women, which is in accordance with previous studies [11, 47–49]. An important reason for this is likely related to cultural and moral considerations. In contrast to women, men are more likely to engage in risky behaviors and dangerous activities. In a cross-sectional study of the university students of the Russian Federation, men were more likely to consume alcohol and drank much more than women [50]. Studies of Romanian youth also showed a higher frequency of alcohol consumption among men compared to women [14]. However, there are reports that attest to college women getting drunk more frequently than men [51]. Our study shows that, in Romania, a very small percentage of women drank in a risky way. As a researcher of alcohol consumption in Romania, Rada [14] pointed out that in Romanian society, in general, women are more criticized than men for smoking or consuming alcoholic beverages in public places. Our research also noted an exception. The analysis of a sample of students from Ukraine did not show statistically significant differences in the frequency of risky drinking among women and men (p = 0.42) from this country. According to national research conducted in Ukraine, an age of 18–25 is the main risk factor for alcohol consumption [52]. There are studies showing that women are more diverse than men in terms of alcohol consumption [53].

Our study did not show statistically significant differences in the frequency of risky drinking between the analyzed countries, with the exception of Romanian students. In the studied group of students, the percentage of men engaging in risky drinking is similar across the four compared countries of the Carpathian Euroregion (21.1% in Poland, 20.1% in Slovakia, 17.6% in Romania, and 16.1% in Ukraine). Similar to international studies [35], students from Poland and Slovakia are characterized by higher alcohol consumption (heavy drinking) relative to the other countries covered by this study. The highest percentages of women who are risky drinkers are in Ukraine (12.2%), Poland (10.8%), and Slovakia (9.8%). The lowest percentage of such women is recorded for Romania (3.5%), which is confirmed by results from other studies [35]. In our study, interestingly, there is a lack of such distinct differences for the percentage of risky drinkers between countries (especially in men) in comparison with the statistically significant differences in the frequency of consumption of particular types of alcohol. In other words, although the preferences for consuming specific types of alcohol are significantly different in the compared countries, the percentage of people who drink alcohol in a risky manner occurs to a similar extent, regardless of the type of the drink consumed.

The result of the present research indicates a relationship between smoking and drinking alcohol in a risky manner, which corresponds to the results of other authors' work [34, 49]. The cooccurrence of behaviors such as smoking and alcohol abuse carries increased risks of cardiovascular complications and cancer, which are serious threats to public health [54].

International studies on intensive drinking among college students have shown that drinking alcohol in large quantities is associated with well-educated parents and family wealth [35]. Some studies report a significant relationship between problematic alcohol consumption and a higher level of fathers' education [55]. In our study, only in relation to Polish female students there was a significant correlation between higher education of the father and a good financial situation during school studies and risky alcohol consumption. In turn, there was a connection between risky drinking and a difficult financial situation (p < 0.01) for female students from Ukraine. Ukraine is not a member of the European Union (EU) and is a country with a low national income per capita; however, alcohol is easily available there at a low price relative to earnings. Studies on the socioeconomic status (SES) of Ukrainian residents and its relation to alcohol consumption have shown that younger people with low status (SES) have higher rates of alcohol consumption and smoking [21]. In the other countries studied here, these variables do not show any relation to the risky drinking model.

Studies have shown that intensive drinking is more common among students who live on campus [50], away from home [35]. A study of Slovak students reported that life with parents during the semester was consistently associated with less frequent episodic drinking, fewer episodes of drunkenness, and fewer problems with drinking [11]. In contrast to the studies quoted above, no significant relationship was found between the place of residence during studies and a risky pattern of alcohol consumption by students from the studied countries. Male college students from Poland are the only exception (p = 0.01). Students living in a dormitory drink in a risky way more often.

5. Limitations

The nature of this study includes some limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. The limitation is the lack of data from the Hungarian part of the Carpathian Euroregion. The sample included students in their first stage of studies (bachelor's degree). Therefore, generalization of the findings to all students should be taken with caution. Further studies accounting for these limitations are necessary.

6. Conclusions

Ethyl alcohol is a very popular psychoactive drug among young people, the abuse of which often coexists with other risky behaviors. In the studied academic environments of the Carpathian Euroregion, it was found that the risky drinking model occurs to a similar degree, regardless of the country of origin. The study of health behaviors in cross-border areas plays a key role in shaping the direction of local policy, intervention, and education of a given region with respect to the sphere of public health and mitigation of existing threats. The results of this research can be used in planning regional preventive programs in the academic environment, covering the countries of the Carpathian Euroregion.

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Project no. N RSA4 01654.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Rehm J., Baliunas D., Borges G. L. G., et al. The relation between different dimensions of alcohol consumption and burden of disease: an overview. Addiction. 2010;105(5):817–843. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02899.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rehm J., Gmel G. E., Gmel G., et al. The relationship between different dimensions of alcohol use and the burden of disease—an update. Addiction. 2017;112(6):968–1001. doi: 10.1111/add.13757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Health Organization. The European health report 2012: charting the way to well-being. WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2013. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/197113/EHR2012-Eng.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. The European health report 2012 Targets and beyond – Reaching new frontiers in evidence. WHO; 2015. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/288645/European-health-report-2015-full-book-en.pdf?ua=1. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Forouzanfar M. H., Alexander L., Anderson H. R., et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries,: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2013;386, 10010:2287–2323. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00128-2.19902013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.van Hoof J. J., Moll M. Adolescent alcohol consumption in Romania: A blueprint for measuring alcohol (mis)use. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala. 2012;37:77–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marshall E. J. Adolescent alcohol use: Risks and consequences. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2014;49(2):160–164. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agt180.agt180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Guo L., Deng J., He Y., et al. Alcohol use and alcohol-related problems among adolescents in China A large-scale cross-sectional study. Medicine (United States) 2016;95(38) doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004533.e4533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miller J. W., Naimi T. S., Brewer R. D., Jones S. E. Binge drinking and associated health risk behaviors among high school students. Pediatrics. 2007;119(1):76–85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.OECD, Tackling Harmful Alcohol Use: Economics and Public Health Policy. OECD Publishing; 2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sebena R., Orosova O., Mikolajczyk R. T., Van Dijk J. P. Selected sociodemographic factors and related differences in patterns of alcohol use among university students in Slovakia. BMC Public Health. 2011;11 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Heydarabadi A. B., Ramezankhani A., Barekati H., et al. Prevalence of substance abuse among dormitory students of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. International Journal of High Risk Behaviors & Addiction. 2015;4(2) doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.22350v2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sanchez-Ramirez D. C., Franklin R., Voaklander D. Hazardous alcohol use in 2 countries: A comparison between Alberta, Canada and Queensland, Australia. Journal of Preventive Medicine & Public Health. 2017;50(5):311–319. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.17.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rada C., Ispas A. T. Alcohol consumption and accentuated personality traits among young adults in Romania: A cross-sectional study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2016;11(1) doi: 10.1186/s13011-016-0080-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ahlström S. K., Österberg E. L. International perspectives on adolescent and young adult drinking. Alcohol Research and Health. 2005;28(4):258–268. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Britton A., Ben-Shlomo Y., Benzeval M., Kuh D., Bell S. Life course trajectories of alcohol consumption in the United Kingdom using longitudinal data from nine cohort studies. BMC Medicine. 2015;13(1) doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0273-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jenkins R., Othieno C., Ongeri L., et al. Alcohol consumption and hazardous drinking in western Kenya-A household survey in a health and demographic surveillance site. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15(1) doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0603-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bendtsen P., Karlsson N., Dalal K., Nilsen P. Hazardous drinking concepts, limits and methods: Low levels of awareness, knowledge and use in the Swedish population. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2011;46(5):638–645. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agr065.agr065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Suchy W., Gaczkowska A., Pawelczyk A., et al. Alcohol use among medicine and law students in Poland. Journal of Medical Science. 2015;3(84):183–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.De Freitas E. A. M., Luis M. A. V. Perception of students about alcohol consumption and illicit drugs. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem. 2015;28(5):408–414. doi: 10.1590/1982-0194201500069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Salnykova A., Vorobyova A., Rouhani S. Tobacco and Alcohol Consumption in Post-Soviet Ukraine: Qualitative Findings from Community Consultations. Tobacco Control and Public Health in Eastern Europe. 2016;6(1):1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Isralowitz R., Reznik A., Gritsenko V., Khalepo O., Kovaleva Y. Alcohol Use and Related Problem Behavior: a Survey Among Russian Federation and Israeli Female University Students. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2017:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Grant B. F., Chou S. P., Saha T. D., et al. Prevalence of 12-month alcohol use, high-risk drinking, and DSM-IV alcohol use disorder in the United States, 2001-2002 to 2012-2013: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(9):911–923. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bobak M., Malyutina S., Horvat P., et al. Alcohol, drinking pattern and all-cause, cardiovascular and alcohol-related mortality in Eastern Europe. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2016;31(1):21–30. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0092-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zadarko-Domaradzka M., Zadarko E., Barabasz Z., Sobolewski M. Alcohol use and health-risk behaviours among academic students in Podkarpackie. Przegląd Lekarski. 2013;70(8):546–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Podstawski R., Wesołowska E., Choszcz D. Trends in alcohol drinking among university students at the Polish University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn. NAD Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 2017;34(5):430–441. doi: 10.1177/1455072517709919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Salanta C. L., Tofana M., Pop C., Pop A., Coldea T., Mudura E. Beverage Alcohol Choice Among University Students: Perception, Consumption and Preferences. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Food Science and Technology. 2017;74(1):p. 23. doi: 10.15835/buasvmcn-fst:12633. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bilčik V., Duleba A., Klyap M., Mitryayeva S., editors. Role of the Carpathian Euroregion in Strengthening and Stabilizing Central and Eastern Europe. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.World Health Organization. Lexicon of alcohol and drug terms. WHO; 1994. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/39461/1/9241544686_eng.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.The State Agency for the Prevention of Alcohol-Related Problems in Poland (PARPA) http://www.parpa.pl/ [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pruett D., Waterman E. H., Caughey A. B. Fetal alcohol exposure: consequences, diagnosis, and treatment. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey . 2013;68(1):62–69. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31827f238f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Noureldin M., Krause J., Jin L., et al. Drug-Alcohol Interactions: A Review of Three Therapeutic Classes. US Pharm. 2010;35(11):29–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Devaux M., Sassi F. Alcohol consumption and harmful drinking: Trends and social disparities across OECD countries, OECD Health Working Papers, No. 79. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mekonen T., Fekadu W., Chane T., Bitew S. Problematic alcohol use among university students. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2017;8:p. 86. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dantzer C., Wardle J., Fuller R., Pampalone S. Z., Steptoe A. International study of heavy drinking: Attitudes and sociodemographic factors in university students. Journal of American College Health. 2006;55(2):83–89. doi: 10.3200/JACH.55.2.83-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Demirbas H. Predictive Psychological Factors of Problematic Alcohol use in University Students. Journal of Addiction Therapy and Research. 2017;1(1):007–015. doi: 10.29328/journal.jatr.1001002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Brandão Y. S. T., Correia D. S., De Farias M. S. J. A., Antunes T. M. T., Da Silva L. A. The prevalence of alcohol consumption among the students newly enrolled at a public university. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2011;3(3):345–349. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.84434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.de Carvalho e Martins M. C., Vilanova C. M. A., de Carvalho I. L. N. F., et al. Alcohol Use by Brazilian College Students. Family Medicine & Medical Science Research. 2016;5(1):p. 194. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stock C., Mikolajczyk R., Bloomfield K., et al. Alcohol consumption and attitudes towards banning alcohol sales on campus among European university students. Public Health. 2009;123(2):122–129. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sebena R., El Ansari W., Stock C., Orosova O., Mikolajczyk R. T. Are perceived stress, depressive symptoms and religiosity associated with alcohol consumption? A survey of freshmen university students across five European countries. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2012;7, article 21 doi: 10.1186/1747-597x-7-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.El Ansari W., Sebena R., Stock C. Socio-demographic correlates of six indicators of alcohol consumption: Survey findings of students across seven universities in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Archives of Public Health. 2013;71(1) doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-71-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Davoren M. P., Demant J., Shiely F., Perry I. J. Alcohol consumption among university students in Ireland and the United Kingdom from 2002 to 2014: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1) doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2843-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Al-Zboon E., Al-Dababneh K. Substance abuse at Jordanian universities: Perspectives of pre-service special education teachers. Journal of Substance Use. 2017;22(5):541–548. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2016.1271031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Folasayo A. T., Oluwasegun A. J., Samsudin S., Saudi S. N. S., Osman M., Hamat R. A. Assessing the knowledge level, attitudes, risky behaviors and preventive practices on sexually transmitted diseases among university students as future healthcare providers in the central zone of Malaysia: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14(2) doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.World Health Organization (WHO) Global status report on alcohol and health. 2014. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112736/1/9789240692763_eng.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Landberg J. Alcohol-Related Problems in Eastern Europe. A Comparative Perspective. Sweden Stockholm: Universitetsservice US-AB; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Özgür Ilhan I., Yildirim F., Demirbaş H., Doğan Y. B. Alcohol use prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of alcohol use in a university student sample in Turkey. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2008;43(7):575–583. doi: 10.1007/s00127-008-0335-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Creighton G., Oliffe J., Matthews J., Saewyc E. “Dulling the Edges”: Young Men’s Use of Alcohol to Deal With Grief Following the Death of a Male Friend. Health Education & Behavior. 2016;43(1):54–60. doi: 10.1177/1090198115596164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Babalola E., Ighoroje M., Awhangansi S., et al. Psychosocial Correlates of Hazardous Alcohol Use among Secondary School Teachers in Southwestern Nigeria. International Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2017;5(1):16–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Reznik A., Isralowitz R., Gritsenko V., Khalepo O., Kovaleva Y. Russian Federation university student alcohol use: Smolensk City—a case example. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse. 2018:1–9. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2017.1417188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Varela-Mato V., Cancela J. M., Ayan C., et al. Lifestyle and health among Spanish university students: differences by gender and academic discipline. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2012;9(8):2728–2741. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9082728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Webb C. P. M., Bromet E. J., Gluzman S., et al. Epidemiology of heavy alcohol use in Ukraine: Findings from the world mental health survey. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2005;40(4):327–335. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bond J. C., Roberts S. C. M., Greenfield T. K., Korcha R., Ye Y., Nayak M. B. Gender differences in public and private drinking contexts: A multi-level GENACIS analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2010;7(5):2136–2160. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7052136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Verplaetse T. L., McKee S. A. An overview of alcohol and tobacco/nicotine interactions in the human laboratory. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2017;43(2):186–196. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2016.1189927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Abayomi O., Onifade P. O., Adelufosi A. O., Akinhanmi A. O. Psychosocial correlates of hazardous alcohol use among undergraduates in southwestern Nigeria. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2013;35(3):320–324. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES